Skeptic schism chess board pieces

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:fpig: :hankey: :burn: :cdc: :twatson: :bjarte: :rimshot: :popcorn: :D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek: :clap: :dance: :doh: :drool: :hand: :liar: :naughty: :pray: :shhh: :shifty: :snooty: :think: :violin: :whistle: :nin:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Skeptic schism chess board pieces

Re: Skeptic schism chess board pieces

#9

by Opyt » Tue Jun 03, 2014 3:54 am

FTB should be black, but they'll reverse the knights for that exact reason. It'll keep chess interesting.

Re: Skeptic schism chess board pieces

#8

by Kirbmarc » Tue Jun 03, 2014 3:30 am

FTB is black and the Pit iswhite,of course. Unless FTB is white so the Knight are.....White Knights.

Re: Skeptic schism chess board pieces

#7

by Kirbmarc » Tue Jun 03, 2014 3:30 am

FTB is black and the Pit iswhite,of course. Unless FTB is white so the Knight are.....White Knights.

Re: Skeptic schism chess board pieces

#6

by Opyt » Thu May 29, 2014 5:27 pm

SkepticalCat wrote:FTB/Skepchick would have to be all pawns - can't have any privileged pieces, you know.
You've got it ALL wrong. They've clearly got a power structure over there.
Being blind to privilege is a privilege only men can have, .'. only the MALES can be pawns.
Unless they identify as "Other" on their US Census forms.

Re: Skeptic schism chess board pieces

#5

by SkepticalCat » Thu May 29, 2014 12:10 pm

FTB/Skepchick would have to be all pawns - can't have any privileged pieces, you know.

Re: Skeptic schism chess board pieces

#4

by Stretchycheese » Tue May 13, 2014 1:49 pm

Hmmm, in keeping with chess piece appearances, perhaps the Rooks should be structures instead:

FTB/Skepchick/A+: Elevator car

Slymepit/Skeptics: ??? Not sure on this one. Any ideas?

Mykeru and Nerd of Redhead should still be among the pieces: either bishops or knights.

Re: Skeptic schism chess board pieces

#3

by Stretchycheese » Tue May 13, 2014 1:35 pm

I changed my mind about Rook1. It should be Mykeru instead! A cow-skull headed chess piece would be pretty cool too.

Re: Skeptic schism chess board pieces

#2

by John Greg » Tue May 13, 2014 9:46 am

LOL. I like it. Seriously, it sounds wonderful.

Skeptic schism chess board pieces

#1

by Stretchycheese » Tue May 13, 2014 7:54 am

Has anyone seen politically based chess board pieces like this? --

http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/interactive ... ges/01.jpg

I think it would be cool to have a skeptic schism based chess board too. Here are some ideas:

FTB/Skepchick/A+:
Pawns: Mainly FTB commentariat stereotypes, judging from photos: overweight, neckbeards, horn rimmed glasses, etc...
King: PZ Myers
Queen: Rebecca Watson
Knight1: Greg Laden
Knight2: Lousy Canuck
Bishop1: Stef Svan
Bishop2: Ophelia Benson
Rook1: Nerd of Redhead (you got to have a robot like piece, just for fun)
Rook2: Karen Stollznow

Slymepit/Skeptics:
Pawns: A bunch of guys in fedoras and women in bikinis
King: Richard Dawkins
Queen: Abbie Smith
Knight1: Justin Vacula
Knight2: Thunderf00t
Bishop1: Ellen Beth Wachs
Bishop2: Paula Kirby
Rook1: Michael Shermer
Rook2: Ben Radford

Top