Theoretically not impossible, but in order to convince people to support this reform, you need to appeal to a vast number of voters, far beyond those who can stomach the identity politics of the alt-right.
Institute functional language and culture tests - if you can’t communicate you can’t be part of society
Establish English as the official national language
If properly implemented, this doesn't sound too bad. It also doesn't require the "cultural replacement" rhetoric.
Teach a non black-armband history and celebrate national holidays
Again, the trick is how you set this up, but nothing too awful, at least on those terms. History is complex and hardly ever morally black or white, but some public recognition of important moments of the past is not a bad idea. As long as it's not used to promote alienation of a part of the population, and instead inspired by messages of unity along the lines of the institutions of the country, I see nothing wrong with this.
I actually think that the simplistic SocJus rhetoric turns some academic arguments over history into banal platitudes ("oppressed/oppressors") that do not actually help anyone.
Reward those people who do not hold dual citizenship
How so? The devil seems to be in the details with this one.
Limit or ban most foreign ownership of property - especially infrastructure and residential
This will severely limit trade, and have very bad effects on your economy. It's also quite illiberal, at least on those terms.
Drop state sponsored SJW aligned programs and initiatives
It depends on how this is implemented. Done badly it could severely impact academic freedom. It's better to put rules to limit ideological dogpiling by limiting the power of people to fire or "deplatform" people for their political views, and let academia sort itself out.
Reject on principle parallel cultural special rights for Islam and other ethnic minorities
Nothing to object here.
Retain the current flag and democratic system
Perfectly doable without any negative consequence.
Try to develop strategies that encourages amateur sport
I'd add in strategies to encourage civic engagement over shared projects. Sport is definitely an avenue for community building, but not the only one.
Don’t reward elite institutions who spaz out when cultural emblematic Christianity is occasionally invoked ...
I don't think Christianity needs to have a special institutional place in order for your plan to function.
Offer “return to homeland” assistance for those unwilling to play along.
This is very unlikely to happen, at least voluntarily.
These seem to be a pretty reasonable set of club house rules.
Some are more reasonable than others. However even some of the most reasonable ones probably require you to win elections to be implemented. And in order to do that, the overly "ethnic" focus of your favorite Youtube pundits very likely needs to go. Looking at
Australian elections, there doesn't seem to be much room for an identitarian, ethnic-based far-right movement anyway.
Bitching online on a small forum won't help you to get anything done. And promoting grifters like Goldy or Southern is even less likely to get you where you want.
[quote=Brive1987 post_id=487785 time= user_id=876]Limit immigration to 70k pa[/quote]
Theoretically not impossible, but in order to convince people to support this reform, you need to appeal to a vast number of voters, far beyond those who can stomach the identity politics of the alt-right.
[quote]Institute functional language and culture tests - if you can’t communicate you can’t be part of society
Establish English as the official national language[/quote]
If properly implemented, this doesn't sound too bad. It also doesn't require the "cultural replacement" rhetoric.
[quote]Teach a non black-armband history and celebrate national holidays[/quote]
Again, the trick is how you set this up, but nothing too awful, at least on those terms. History is complex and hardly ever morally black or white, but some public recognition of important moments of the past is not a bad idea. As long as it's not used to promote alienation of a part of the population, and instead inspired by messages of unity along the lines of the institutions of the country, I see nothing wrong with this.
I actually think that the simplistic SocJus rhetoric turns some academic arguments over history into banal platitudes ("oppressed/oppressors") that do not actually help anyone.
[quote]Reward those people who do not hold dual citizenship[/quote]
How so? The devil seems to be in the details with this one.
[quote]Limit or ban most foreign ownership of property - especially infrastructure and residential[/quote]
This will severely limit trade, and have very bad effects on your economy. It's also quite illiberal, at least on those terms.
[quote]Drop state sponsored SJW aligned programs and initiatives[/quote]
It depends on how this is implemented. Done badly it could severely impact academic freedom. It's better to put rules to limit ideological dogpiling by limiting the power of people to fire or "deplatform" people for their political views, and let academia sort itself out.
[quote]Reject on principle parallel cultural special rights for Islam and other ethnic minorities[/quote]
Nothing to object here.
[quote]Retain the current flag and democratic system[/quote]
Perfectly doable without any negative consequence.
[quote]Try to develop strategies that encourages amateur sport[/quote]
I'd add in strategies to encourage civic engagement over shared projects. Sport is definitely an avenue for community building, but not the only one.
[quote]Don’t reward elite institutions who spaz out when cultural emblematic Christianity is occasionally invoked ...[/quote]
I don't think Christianity needs to have a special institutional place in order for your plan to function.
[quote]Offer “return to homeland” assistance for those unwilling to play along.[/quote]
This is very unlikely to happen, at least voluntarily.
[quote]These seem to be a pretty reasonable set of club house rules.[/quote]
Some are more reasonable than others. However even some of the most reasonable ones probably require you to win elections to be implemented. And in order to do that, the overly "ethnic" focus of your favorite Youtube pundits very likely needs to go. Looking at [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Australian_federal_election]Australian elections[/url], there doesn't seem to be much room for an identitarian, ethnic-based far-right movement anyway.
Bitching online on a small forum won't help you to get anything done. And promoting grifters like Goldy or Southern is even less likely to get you where you want.