You is all a bunch of poofs!

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.

BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: You is all a bunch of poofs!

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9220

by Brive1987 » Mon Jan 27, 2020 1:16 pm

https://www.t-nation.com/diet-fat-loss/ ... ood-claims

1 – Low Fat
2 – High Fiber
3 – Cholesterol
4 – Sodium
5 – Gluten

A nice 101 with references.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9219

by KiwiInOz » Mon Jan 27, 2020 11:35 am

franc wrote:
franc wrote: Oh jesus, this is gold. Bumped into an old friend from atheism circa 2008. They showed me this. This is how Chrys Stevenson rationalised her part in trying to destroy me and harming a dozen innocents with the shrapnel. She emailed this shit to anyone who may have known me. It's nauseating reading. For the record, Porky did try it on with me in a manner that if the genders were reversed would constitute rape. If you want to read, get a barf bag.
The more long winded they are, the more you know they're spinning shit. A simple falsehood deserves a flip-off and nothing more.
tldr, #franc

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9218

by Brive1987 » Mon Jan 27, 2020 3:32 am

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9217

by Brive1987 » Mon Jan 27, 2020 3:30 am

KiwiInOz wrote:
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: Snip
Sorry if my meaning wasn't clear: I wasn't questioning your assessment of Australia's history, but FTP's inference that Muslims and Chinese were recent additions to the magnificent diversity of Australian life, when in fact they have been a part of "Australia" since white Christians, pretty much (i.e. late C19 by your analysis).
There is some evidence that the Chinese were here and trading with the Aboriginal population of south NSW quite a few years before whitey discovered the continent. Can't put my hands on it just yet. But will try and locate it.
Don’t forget the Dutch. It’s a Groote Eylandt.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9216

by franc » Mon Jan 27, 2020 1:14 am

franc wrote: Oh jesus, this is gold. Bumped into an old friend from atheism circa 2008. They showed me this. This is how Chrys Stevenson rationalised her part in trying to destroy me and harming a dozen innocents with the shrapnel. She emailed this shit to anyone who may have known me. It's nauseating reading. For the record, Porky did try it on with me in a manner that if the genders were reversed would constitute rape. If you want to read, get a barf bag.
The more long winded they are, the more you know they're spinning shit. A simple falsehood deserves a flip-off and nothing more.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9215

by franc » Mon Jan 27, 2020 12:49 am

Oh jesus, this is gold. Bumped into an old friend from atheism circa 2008. They showed me this. This is how Chrys Stevenson rationalised her part in trying to destroy me and harming a dozen innocents with the shrapnel. She emailed this shit to anyone who may have known me. It's nauseating reading. For the record, Porky did try it on with me in a manner that if the genders were reversed would constitute rape. If you want to read, get a barf bag.

===

From: Chrys Stevenson <#########@yahoo.com.au>
Date: 18 December 2011 9:57:55 PM AEST
To: #########
Subject: Re: Regarding your recent post on ######## and the constant in fighting among atheists.
Reply-To: Chrys Stevenson <#########@yahoo.com.au>

########, it seems there's been some misunderstanding. My cousin Doug has just told me he was the 'someone' who said you should write to me for my side of the story. In that case, I'm happy to give you some more information.

At some point ######## moved from being a somewhat loveable grumpy character who fought serious issues with reason and evidence, to being an online bully and troll.

He moved beyond disagreeing with someone and became obsessive. He hurled foul, sexist and intimidating abuse, obsessively, over a period of months, at a woman called Ophelia Benson because she disagreed with him. He did the same to Professor PZ Myers and some others. ######## also threatened to 'stalk' Professor Myers and his followers at the forthcoming Global Atheist Convention and to put something into Myers' pocket without him knowing about it. That is just plain creepy.

Whether or not ######## meant what he said, this is the kind of threat commonly made by psychopaths who DO intend to stalk and harm their victims. ######## has even admitted publicly that he knew he was on dangerous ground, but decided to go there anyway. The fact that ######## said the object he would put into Professor Myers' pocket would be harmless does not make it any better. Would YOU take the word of someone who had abused you for months, and then said they were going to stalk you and touch you without your permission? How do you think Mrs Myers feels about her husband being threatened this way? How does she know that this strange internet person doesn't intend to put something harmful in her husband's pocket? ######## doesn't even consider the effect this might have on his victims' families.

When I found out about what ######## was doing I was horrified. Because I had been the subject of internet bullying myself (NOT from ########) I wrote a blog post in support of Ms Benson and Professor Myers.

######## does not seem to understand that this was my one and only motivation. You mentioned to Doug that I've been kind to you in the past. That was what I was doing to them. They were being bullied and I felt I had to stand up and say, "This is wrong."

########'s behaviour was unacceptable. These people were no threat to him. I'm not saying he shouldn't have disagreed with them. But he didn't just disagree, he became obsessive and vicioous and made personal, crude remarks about them. That was not necessary and it was not reasonable or rational. Reason and rationality were the things ######## used to believe in. I read some of his posts and realised that this was no longer about those things - it was a personal vendetta being waged for no good reasn.

I believe that when this kind of thing happens, you have to speak out in defence of what is right - regardless of the personal cost.

And there has been a personal cost. ######## has tried to suggest that I had romantic feelings towards him. Nothing could be further from the truth! I've never had a romantic thought about ######## in my life! To start with, he's much younger than me. Secondly, I've pretty much had it with romance and think it's a bit overrated. I never, ever had any romantic feelings about him.

######## even suggested that I did a deal with Professor Myers to support him in return for putting my blog on his Freethought Blogs website. Not only hasn't any offer been made, but I wouldn't be interested if it was! It's just a silly suggestion. Something ######## made up. The old ######## wouldn't have made up stuff like that. But now he does. Something is very wrong.

You will see in my blog comments that every false claim ######## has made against me, I've able to refute calmly and reasonably.

Last night ######## made his cruellest move. He said on Facebook that I had frequently asked people to go easy on my cousin, Doug, because 'he was the slow one in the family'. Doug read this. ########, you know what it's like not to be supported by your family. Doug is in much the same position. How would you feel if you had one relative who really loved and supported you and then you read that they had been saying cruel things about you behind your back on the internet? You'd be devastated, right? What if it turned out that the person who told you this had just made it up? What kind of person does that? What kind of person would hurt you to score a point against someone you love?

Luckily, Doug and I have a very close relationship and he knows me well enough to know this had to be a lie. What ######## did was take something I had said and misrepresented it to look ugly. What I have said to people, not frequently, but on a few occasions, is that they should not criticize Doug's spelling and grammar because he is severely dyslexic and such comments could hurt him. What I was doing was protecting my cousin from hurtful remarks. That is a long way from ########'s lie that I was telling people Doug was 'slow'.

########, you and I have both been friends with ######## in the past. But consider, this is someone who will intentionally lie and hurt someone else - an innocent bystander - in order to get at me. That is truly despicable and shows just how low he will stoop.

I have much better things to do than to fight with ########. But I will always stand up against bullies who call people names, try to intimidate them into keeping silent,and threaten to stalk and assault them (and yes, unwanted touching IS assault).

I hate these in-fights too and I am only responding when ######## makes false accusations about me.

########, I know ######## has been very kind and supportive of you and I can understand that you might wonder why I seem to have turned on him. Generally, I will defend my friends to the hilt. But ########, I simply can't defend what ######## has done in recent months. He has been cruel, vindictive, obsessive and just plain creepy. He treats Professor Myers and Ophelia Benson like they're scum, but they are real people with feelings and family - just like you and me.

I did ask a friend who is a professional psychologist to give me a professional opinion on whether ######## was a potential threat. If he had said, "No, I think he's just a big wind-bag" perhaps I wouldn't have spoken out so harshly. But my psychologist friend said he was very, very worried about ######## and that there were definite markers of mental health issues in his writing. Of course, you can't make a diagnosis from the internet and he didn't do that. But a psychologist can compare what ######## writes with what OTHER people who HAVE turned out to be dangerous write. ######## sounds like he may be dangerous to a very respected psychiatrist. He also sounds very much like another stalker that Professor Myers had who turned out to be mentally disturbed with substance abuse problems. I'm NOT saying ######## is mentally ill or addicted to alcohol or drugs. What I am saying is that the obsession, the abuse, the threats make him sound like someone like that, and that's why he's scaring people.

I don't know what is wrong with ########. He seems to be very jealous of my very small level of writing success. The ridiculous thing is, he could have been as successful or more successful than me if he had just stuck to writing good arguments instead of going off on a months' long series of abusive rants. Besides which, I'm not particularly successful and I was always happy to use whatever success I had to help ######## establish himself as a writer. I did everything I could to help and encourage him. But, HE ruined his own chances by going on this ridiculous crusade against Ophelia Benson and PZ Myers. No-one will ever publish his work now, and that's all his own doing - not mine.

So, ########, the short answer to your question is that I didn't write about ######## for revenge. I didn't write about him because I had any romantic ideas about him. I didn't write about him so that PZ Myers would put my blog on his network. I didn't write about ######## for any reason other than he had been cruel, unkind, sexist and threatening and my personal moral code says that you can't let that kind of behaviour pass without comment - even when that behaviour comes from someone you once considered a friend.


I hope this email explains my position clear. If you have any more questions I'd be happy to answer them and I am sorry I misunderstood your message. I just didn't know who this 'someone' might have been.

Chrys

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9214

by KiwiInOz » Mon Jan 27, 2020 12:34 am

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: Snip
Sorry if my meaning wasn't clear: I wasn't questioning your assessment of Australia's history, but FTP's inference that Muslims and Chinese were recent additions to the magnificent diversity of Australian life, when in fact they have been a part of "Australia" since white Christians, pretty much (i.e. late C19 by your analysis).
There is some evidence that the Chinese were here and trading with the Aboriginal population of south NSW quite a few years before whitey discovered the continent. Can't put my hands on it just yet. But will try and locate it.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9213

by John D » Sun Jan 26, 2020 7:31 pm

Who the fuck is Nipsey Hustle?

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9212

by free thoughtpolice » Sun Jan 26, 2020 7:30 pm

Brive1987 wrote:

:lol:
That isn't an issue here, the property in question isn't owned by them, they are just there temporarily apparently. I haven't any local news about the
(local) abos going off on them. People here don't have a problem with them moving in as long as they pay their way and don't have to be subsidized for their security and other expenses.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9211

by Brive1987 » Sun Jan 26, 2020 7:23 pm

Has Steersman jumped the shark?

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9210

by John D » Sun Jan 26, 2020 7:14 pm

Demi Lovato - She feels stupid when she sings .... and no one is listening... um... you sell millions of records. Grow up bitch. Kill yourself? Don't care. Grow up... read a book.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9209

by Brive1987 » Sun Jan 26, 2020 7:07 pm



:lol:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9208

by John D » Sun Jan 26, 2020 7:04 pm

I am in love with Molly Tuttle right now.... don't tell my wife.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9207

by John D » Sun Jan 26, 2020 6:48 pm

It's official. Stephen Tyler has gotten so old... I am now a better singer than he is... haha... and the Run DMC guitar riff is being played by some bloke off stage... and I am supposed to enjoy this fucking shit?... some negro with big sun glasses shouting crap into a mic. Anything for money I guess.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9206

by free thoughtpolice » Sun Jan 26, 2020 6:34 pm

John D wrote: I fucking hate people...really. So, I'm watching the mother fucking Grammy Awards... and laughing at all the lip sync BS performances. And some cunt comes on and says shit like "I am so honored to be on stage with the woman that broke down so many doors in country music... Shania Twain!"... haha... and I am like ... "Oh fuck, and all this time I thought it was Maybel Carter who broke down doors 70 fucking years ago"... but no... it must be the slutty cunt Shania Twain that dressed like a stripper and sang pop country. A real artistic pioneer that Shania Twain! And even if you don't want to go back 70 years you can always credit Dolly Parton, or Linda Ronstandt... well fuck. It sucks getting old and having these pretentious lying pretty people try to tell me about music history. Fucking fuck.


I knew this would happen. I was a skeptical person when I was in my teens... and I kind of assumed I would hate people more and more as I got older. I was right. People are really fucking shit-ass self aggrandizing liars. Fucking Jonas Brothers lip-sync bullshit.... and some yellow-hair nigger faggot jumping around (lip-syncing) pretending to do performance art. Jesus Christ.... people like this shit? Really.

Where is the talent? They were obviously not invited.... but it is clear... all Grammy performers must be good lip-singers.

Ok... Tanya Tucker is really good... except for the botox.... best performance of the show so far.

Dave Chapelle did just win best comedy album! Well deserved.

Maybe I will post again at the end of the show. Maybe not... because of hating people and shit.
A salute to all the C&W stars that were disses:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9205

by John D » Sun Jan 26, 2020 6:16 pm

I fucking hate people...really. So, I'm watching the mother fucking Grammy Awards... and laughing at all the lip sync BS performances. And some cunt comes on and says shit like "I am so honored to be on stage with the woman that broke down so many doors in country music... Shania Twain!"... haha... and I am like ... "Oh fuck, and all this time I thought it was Maybel Carter who broke down doors 70 fucking years ago"... but no... it must be the slutty cunt Shania Twain that dressed like a stripper and sang pop country. A real artistic pioneer that Shania Twain! And even if you don't want to go back 70 years you can always credit Dolly Parton, or Linda Ronstandt... well fuck. It sucks getting old and having these pretentious lying pretty people try to tell me about music history. Fucking fuck.

I knew this would happen. I was a skeptical person when I was in my teens... and I kind of assumed I would hate people more and more as I got older. I was right. People are really fucking shit-ass self aggrandizing liars. Fucking Jonas Brothers lip-sync bullshit.... and some yellow-hair nigger faggot jumping around (lip-syncing) pretending to do performance art. Jesus Christ.... people like this shit? Really.

Where is the talent? They were obviously not invited.... but it is clear... all Grammy performers must be good lip-singers.

Ok... Tanya Tucker is really good... except for the botox.... best performance of the show so far.

Dave Chapelle did just win best comedy album! Well deserved.

Maybe I will post again at the end of the show. Maybe not... because of hating people and shit.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9204

by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Sun Jan 26, 2020 5:34 pm

Brive1987 wrote:
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
Brive1987 wrote:
Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:36 pm
QED

h....ttps://twitter.com/brive1987/status/1220942865670344704?s=21
It is indeed racist! Where are the flags for the more recent immigrants like the Shahada flag for the muslims and the PRC flag for the chinese.
More recent than whom?

It is of course no primary text, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Australia and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Australians indicate that Chinese and Muslims have a history in AUS which fits with Brive's "concept of Australia" forming in the late 19th Century.
There is no real ambiguity that a dominant and unique national identity found expression in Australia during the late 19C. One derived as a subset of Anglo traits reworked in the new social and physical landscape. Chinese and Moslems formed minor sub notes in this process. They hardly defined it.

The national identity evolved (rather than changed) until the melting pot of mass migration and cultural equivalencies kicked in.

Demographics is king.

Then, as Turnbull stated, our unique national identity is actually defined by universal values rather than culture. Orwellian double think.

[img]

There was always a place for minorities (which implies the presence of majorities). But they didn’t define the cultural landscape.
Sorry if my meaning wasn't clear: I wasn't questioning your assessment of Australia's history, but FTP's inference that Muslims and Chinese were recent additions to the magnificent diversity of Australian life, when in fact they have been a part of "Australia" since white Christians, pretty much (i.e. late C19 by your analysis).

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9203

by Brive1987 » Sun Jan 26, 2020 4:33 pm

Pitchguest wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Kobe Bryant dead in helicopter crash:

https://www.sportingnews.com/au/other-s ... j229b9r8h4
I think my brain shut down for a millisecond when I saw news he had died. It just wasn't the kind of news I expected to see. Any basketball fans here? I imagine that's a huge blow to the scene.
Apparently he was flying With his daughter to her sports practice on a Sikorsky S-76B. Very sad and peak Hollywood.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9202

by Service Dog » Sun Jan 26, 2020 3:56 pm

https://i.imgur.com/ehUq8fn.jpg?1

YouTube has disappeared Sargon of Akkad's original YouTube channel.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9201

by Brive1987 » Sun Jan 26, 2020 2:32 pm

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
Brive1987 wrote:
Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:36 pm
QED

h....ttps://twitter.com/brive1987/status/1220942865670344704?s=21
It is indeed racist! Where are the flags for the more recent immigrants like the Shahada flag for the muslims and the PRC flag for the chinese.
More recent than whom?

It is of course no primary text, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Australia and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Australians indicate that Chinese and Muslims have a history in AUS which fits with Brive's "concept of Australia" forming in the late 19th Century.
There is no real ambiguity that a dominant and unique national identity found expression in Australia during the late 19C. One derived as a subset of Anglo traits reworked in the new social and physical landscape. Chinese and Moslems formed minor sub notes in this process. They hardly defined it.

The national identity evolved (rather than changed) until the melting pot of mass migration and cultural equivalencies kicked in.

Demographics is king.

Then, as Turnbull stated, our unique national identity is actually defined by universal values rather than culture. Orwellian double think.

https://i.imgur.com/YpxcxQf.jpg

There was always a place for minorities (which implies the presence of majorities). But they didn’t define the cultural landscape.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9200

by Pitchguest » Sun Jan 26, 2020 2:10 pm

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Kobe Bryant dead in helicopter crash:

https://www.sportingnews.com/au/other-s ... j229b9r8h4
I think my brain shut down for a millisecond when I saw news he had died. It just wasn't the kind of news I expected to see. Any basketball fans here? I imagine that's a huge blow to the scene.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9199

by Matt Cavanaugh » Sun Jan 26, 2020 1:14 pm

Kobe Bryant dead in helicopter crash:

https://www.sportingnews.com/au/other-s ... j229b9r8h4

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9198

by free thoughtpolice » Sun Jan 26, 2020 12:39 pm

Conc. H2O wrote:
More recent than whom?

It is of course no primary text, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Australia and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Australians indicate that Chinese and Muslims have a history in AUS which fits with Brive's "concept of Australia" forming in the late 19th Century.
I thought chinese and muslims immigrating to Aus were diluting the Australianess! Now it turns out they are just renewing Australian values by repeating the history that created the "concept of Australia". :popcorn:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9197

by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Sun Jan 26, 2020 12:22 pm

free thoughtpolice wrote:
Brive1987 wrote:
Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:36 pm
QED

It is indeed racist! Where are the flags for the more recent immigrants like the Shahada flag for the muslims and the PRC flag for the chinese.
More recent than whom?

It is of course no primary text, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Australia and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Australians indicate that Chinese and Muslims have a history in AUS which fits with Brive's "concept of Australia" forming in the late 19th Century.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9196

by free thoughtpolice » Sun Jan 26, 2020 11:36 am

Brive1987 wrote:
Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:36 pm
QED

It is indeed racist! Where are the flags for the more recent immigrants like the Shahada flag for the muslims and the PRC flag for the chinese.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9195

by Brive1987 » Sun Jan 26, 2020 6:04 am

The ‘earlier’ treatment I alluded to were the now styled ‘frontier wars’, massacres, murder of whites and flour poisonings of the colonial period. Pre Federation and all that, but traditionally trotted out as a cross upon which to nail Australia Day.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9194

by Brive1987 » Sun Jan 26, 2020 5:59 am

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Sun Jan 26, 2020 4:02 am
Brive1987 wrote: You could argue the concept of Australia only formed in the late 19thC with geo-nature based self expression morphing into Federation. But apparently we get to own the earlier treatment of the natives, so nah.
"Earlier"?

Wasn't the federal government removing native children from their parents into the 1960s? Wasn't this an attempt to delete the native people by diluting or halting the propagation of their genes?
The usual formulation is that there was a belief full blood aborigine culture was in fatal structural decline but that half caste children could be saved ... via cultural and (eventual) racial assimilation into western society.

This was a poorly considered exercise of the white man’s burden which also offset the unpleasant fate ‘white’ children often faced within the tribe - coupled to sexual exploitation of esp. females from all fronts.

It was also broadly consistent with the govt policy that saw a quarter of a million fully white children removed from their parents between 1930 and 1980.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9193

by Driftless » Sun Jan 26, 2020 5:55 am

Brive1987 wrote:
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: Brive, yours is a very young country, where Europeans arrived a couple of hundred years ago and built themselves a country over the top of existing people. So far, so standard. But the thing with Aus is its very recent history of brutalizing those people and of very explicitly trying to eradicate them. My opinion: I reckon that allows (demands) the insertion of the *current PC term* people into your national day celebrations.

And I am sorry for misgendering your Godsquad friend "Quiet Australian No Longer" (which is a handle I fucking love as I bet she's a proper loudmouthed, red faced, truly awful person to be around at a sausage sizzle).
Interesting. I’m happy to be persuaded otherwise but I’d argue modern nation building for USA, Aust, NZ and Southern Africa all occurred between (say) 1770 and 1900. Whether it be revolutionary wars, westward expansion, Great Treks, exploration and settlement, accommodations with the Maori etc. You could argue the concept of Australia only formed in the late 19thC with geo-nature based self expression morphing into Federation. But apparently we get to own the earlier treatment of the natives, so nah. You could also argue the major American displacement of the Indians occurred west of the Mississippi dating from 1811-1920s. Ie concurrent with Australian expansion.

In any case. No one is denying Aborigines the inclusion of smoking ceremonies with redcoat re-enactments. Or even their post-hoc invented flag representing a non-existent wakanda. But spare me the white hating, nation tearing, black-armband-history political theatre embodied in the 250 flags of mourning.
I don't think Australia and the USA are that different in terms of treatment of natives. Both in time frame and actions. The USA is large and treatment varied from almost tolerance to extermination.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9192

by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Sun Jan 26, 2020 4:02 am

Brive1987 wrote: You could argue the concept of Australia only formed in the late 19thC with geo-nature based self expression morphing into Federation. But apparently we get to own the earlier treatment of the natives, so nah.
"Earlier"?

Wasn't the federal government removing native children from their parents into the 1960s? Wasn't this an attempt to delete the native people by diluting or halting the propagation of their genes?

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9191

by Brive1987 » Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:49 pm

That said. We enjoyed the day down at Ground Zero Ie the Rocks / Circular Quay. Left Barangaroo to the perpetually self-offended to share with depressed Inner-West Council rate-payers.

Here is a still life of metabolic syndrome. Look at how far we have come, now the flour (and vegetable oils/simple carbs) is poisoning us! :mrgreen:

https://i.imgur.com/BEbKD6Y.jpg

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9190

by Brive1987 » Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:14 pm

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: Brive, yours is a very young country, where Europeans arrived a couple of hundred years ago and built themselves a country over the top of existing people. So far, so standard. But the thing with Aus is its very recent history of brutalizing those people and of very explicitly trying to eradicate them. My opinion: I reckon that allows (demands) the insertion of the *current PC term* people into your national day celebrations.

And I am sorry for misgendering your Godsquad friend "Quiet Australian No Longer" (which is a handle I fucking love as I bet she's a proper loudmouthed, red faced, truly awful person to be around at a sausage sizzle).
Interesting. I’m happy to be persuaded otherwise but I’d argue modern nation building for USA, Aust, NZ and Southern Africa all occurred between (say) 1770 and 1900. Whether it be revolutionary wars, westward expansion, Great Treks, exploration and settlement, accommodations with the Maori etc. You could argue the concept of Australia only formed in the late 19thC with geo-nature based self expression morphing into Federation. But apparently we get to own the earlier treatment of the natives, so nah. You could also argue the major American displacement of the Indians occurred west of the Mississippi dating from 1811-1920s. Ie concurrent with Australian expansion.

In any case. No one is denying Aborigines the inclusion of smoking ceremonies with redcoat re-enactments. Or even their post-hoc invented flag representing a non-existent wakanda. But spare me the white hating, nation tearing, black-armband-history political theatre embodied in the 250 flags of mourning.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9189

by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Sat Jan 25, 2020 7:30 pm

Brive, yours is a very young country, where Europeans arrived a couple of hundred years ago and built themselves a country over the top of existing people. So far, so standard. But the thing with Aus is its very recent history of brutalizing those people and of very explicitly trying to eradicate them. My opinion: I reckon that allows (demands) the insertion of the *current PC term* people into your national day celebrations.

And I am sorry for misgendering your Godsquad friend "Quiet Australian No Longer" (which is a handle I fucking love as I bet she's a proper loudmouthed, red faced, truly awful person to be around at a sausage sizzle).

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9188

by free thoughtpolice » Sat Jan 25, 2020 4:20 pm

There hasn't been much wrasslin' content lately so...

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9187

by Brive1987 » Sat Jan 25, 2020 2:43 pm

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9186

by Brive1987 » Sat Jan 25, 2020 1:50 pm

The media are on script.
https://www.news.com.au/national/why-so ... ce4111f60c

“ Happy Australia Day? Until these injustices are righted, it’s hard to see it as little more than the celebration of invasion, genocide and the theft of children, land and basic human dignity.”

Meanwhile Ms Chang is keen to re-educate us on the malleability of Australia Day.
Apparently it was once known nationally as “Foundation Day” so that means we can nix current nazi celebrations as meaningless . :?

https://i.imgur.com/B0ErvZo.png

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9185

by Brive1987 » Sat Jan 25, 2020 1:22 pm

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9184

by Brive1987 » Sat Jan 25, 2020 1:18 pm

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:34 am
Brive1987 wrote: QED

..https...://twitter.com/brive1987/status/1220942865670344704?s=21
For the first tweet: it's been15 hours, and I see no sign yet of these "joyless luvvies" he was hoping to tempt into splenic rage. Almost as though his own anger is entirely manufactured, and the problem is all in his and your heads.

For the second tweet: What's your problem, is there a silent "White" in "Australia Day"?
1. You misgendered ‘Quiet Australian’ which therefore means you lose. :snooty: :dance:

2. There are plenty triggered people stuttering today. Starting with the entire “Inner West Council”

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-ac ... 1cc2df0f63

3. If you note my follow up tweet, the point was that Barangaroo was unironically perpetuating the race-based identitarian divisive agenda normally ascribed to the Anglo celebrations. Focused political theatre.

Buy any-who. I hope you have a spectacular sausage sizzle. Cheers.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9183

by Lsuoma » Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:11 am

Shagging Matilda, fucking nearly killed 'er.
Who'll come a-shagging Matilda with me?
And I whipped it in, whipped it out,
Wiped it on her petticoat.
Who'll come a-shagging Matilda with me?

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9182

by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:59 am

SNL not SNKL.

Fuck this, off for a walk.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9181

by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:59 am

MY BAD: that SNKL video is from 2017, so I guess around the same period as the election stuff?

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9180

by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:56 am

Funniest thing SNL have done for years (since the Baldwin/McCarthy election stuff).

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9179

by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:34 am

Brive1987 wrote: QED

For the first tweet: it's been15 hours, and I see no sign yet of these "joyless luvvies" he was hoping to tempt into splenic rage. Almost as though his own anger is entirely manufactured, and the problem is all in his and your heads.

For the second tweet: What's your problem, is there a silent "White" in "Australia Day"?

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9178

by Brive1987 » Sat Jan 25, 2020 4:59 am

Oops I thought I’d moved on to....

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9177

by Brive1987 » Sat Jan 25, 2020 4:58 am

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9176

by Brive1987 » Sat Jan 25, 2020 4:34 am

Thanks for the thought. If you prefer, feel free to insert either of these alternatives.





Ah. John Williamson ... an authentic voice.

So is this lass ...



If you are brave you can get a duet :o

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9175

by Phil_Giordana_FCD » Sat Jan 25, 2020 3:35 am

I guess it's traditional by now...

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9174

by Brive1987 » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:36 pm

QED

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9173

by Brive1987 » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:16 pm

It’s January 25 - day before Australia Day.

Took the wife and the dog for a walk on the Barangaroo headland around the corner from Circular Quay where the Aboriginal counter production will apparently take place. Rehearsal was in full swing. Massive production with banks of cameras capturing every angle etc. But what really struck me were the overwhelming quantity of aboriginal flags, sans Australian entries, that made the place resemble Nuremberg. Actually quite taken aback by the huge production investment and relentless mono cultural propaganda drive that put the tiki torches in Charlottesville to shame. I’ll post some pics when I roll off my bed.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9172

by Service Dog » Fri Jan 24, 2020 7:32 pm

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: If you think voters are racist, you have the right to negate elections you lose:

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/t ... cna1110356
That essay was so silly, it might cause one to go-back and question the credibility of the author's scholarship on-- the topic of 'queerness' and 4th-wave-woke-intersectional feminism in 1940's 'Wonder Woman' comic books. Book review here: https://www.comicsgrid.com/articles/10.5334/cg.be/

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9171

by Lsuoma » Fri Jan 24, 2020 6:50 pm

BTW, I found out a guaranteed way to discover if dick-havers in a dress are really brave women or skeevy pervs. Transport them to the early pages of Philip Wylie's The Disappeance and see what happens next.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9170

by Lsuoma » Fri Jan 24, 2020 6:45 pm

Black Pride and Colour Prejudice:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9169

by free thoughtpolice » Fri Jan 24, 2020 5:32 pm

MarcusAu wrote: Oh Well, perhaps we can all look forward to the new David Copperfield movie...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4GfEi_GyyU

...or perhaps not.
Not an original observation, but the only really interesting magic trick he performed was how he got into Claudia Schiffer's panties

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9168

by Driftless » Fri Jan 24, 2020 4:46 pm

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9167

by MarcusAu » Fri Jan 24, 2020 12:59 pm

Oh Well, perhaps we can all look forward to the new David Copperfield movie...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4GfEi_GyyU

...or perhaps not.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9166

by Brive1987 » Fri Jan 24, 2020 11:43 am

MarcusAu wrote:
jugheadnaut wrote: Unless the program explicitly shoehorns in African ancestry for Margaret of Anjou, I don't see how this is significantly different than casting short, dark haired, skinny Jonathan Rhys Meyers as King Henry VIII.
I thought it was traditional for tell stories full of propaganda for one cause or another. At least, that seems to be the view of such people as 'The Richard the Third Society' who feel that a re-assessment of the authorised version would not go amiss.

Perhaps the BBC, like Shakespeare have a particular audience in mind that they are looking to pander to.

As in most of these cases, I'll vote with my <insert currency denomination here>, or attention, with the (perhaps) vain hope that the market will provide.

And I'll not be telling people lacking in the appropriate amount of Anglo-Saxon ancestry (or Norman) that they should be staying in their country lane.
I’ll agree with your tentative observation that the BBC is engaged in woke propaganda. I’ll also point out there was no criticism made of the actress for picking up work.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9165

by Pitchguest » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:36 am

Driftless wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:
Service Dog wrote:
Pitchguest wrote: they are absolutely convinced that if they were to have a gun rally of equal size with only black people....the government would enforce even stricter gun control than they have now.
Half of 'em are just parroting Dave Chappelle... he joked that the only way the govt would stand-up to the NRA... is if millions of blacks joined.

They're taking a joke as gospel. Nevermind Chappelle's most recent special, with a long description of precisely-how he'd defend his home with a shotgun.

Black activist complainers pretend police always Occupied their communities. 50 years ago, their complaint was that police Ignored their communities.

The complain about urban Gentrification today. They forgot their complaint about 'White Flight' away from cities, 40 years ago.
Yeesh. Make up yer mind.
The irony is that the Black Panthers' view on gun control back then was similar to the views now held by the NRA: that a citizen's right to bear arms is protected by the Second Amendment and should not be infringed. Only I thought the NRA were supposed to be the bad guys.

Surely if the Black Panther Party disrupted a legislative hearing to protest a gun control Bill at a time when the NRA was actually in support of gun control, then that should make them the bad guys, too, no? The fact that the NRA later changed their mind should be of no consequence, shouldn't it? :think: Truly, we live in a society.
I thought mail order guns were obtainable before the black panthers but not after. I may be misinformed.
Mail order guns were banned shortly after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, four years prior. The new law they were protesting was only in California and it had already been proposed and was just about to be signed into law. It had nothing to do with them at all.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9164

by jugheadnaut » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:28 am

MarcusAu wrote:
jugheadnaut wrote: Unless the program explicitly shoehorns in African ancestry for Margaret of Anjou, I don't see how this is significantly different than casting short, dark haired, skinny Jonathan Rhys Meyers as King Henry VIII.
I thought it was traditional for tell stories full of propaganda for one cause or another. At least, that seems to be the view of such people as 'The Richard the Third Society' who feel that a re-assessment of the authorised version would not go amiss.

Perhaps the BBC, like Shakespeare have a particular audience in mind that they are looking to pander to.

As in most of these cases, I'll vote with my <insert currency denomination here>, or attention, with the (perhaps) vain hope that the market will provide.

And I'll not be telling people lacking in the appropriate amount of Anglo-Saxon ancestry (or Norman) that they should be staying in their country lane.
Exactly. The complicating factor, as I mentioned a few days ago, is critics as a group have become beholden to diversity/inclusion propaganda and are frequently reviewing fidelity to the dogma rather than the actual artistic merits of a piece.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9163

by jugheadnaut » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:09 am

Brive1987 wrote:
jugheadnaut wrote:
Thu Jan 23, 2020 3:22 pm

Unless the program explicitly shoehorns in African ancestry for Margaret of Anjou, I don't see how this is significantly different than casting short, dark haired, skinny Jonathan Rhys Meyers as King Henry VIII.
Two wongs don’t make it white.
:rimshot:

While it's obviously a nice bonus if an actor has a strong physical resemblance to a historical character they are portraying, it's not necessarily wrong, or historical revisionism, to cast an actor who doesn't resemble the character but brings other things to the table. In the case of Rhys Meyers, he brought a sexual energy and overwhelming sense of menace that was fantastic for the role, and most would regard his casting as being an inspired choice, not a mistake (although the last 2 seasons of The Tudors would have been better if Rhys Meyers was willing to use prosthetics to let the character age somewhat historically accurately).

Make no mistake, if the producers of the BBC program, which I'm completely unfamiliar with, earmarked the role for a POC, then I condemn that entirely. But if they hired who they deemed the best actress for the role even though she is black, then I have zero issue with it.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9162

by MarcusAu » Fri Jan 24, 2020 8:45 am

jugheadnaut wrote: Unless the program explicitly shoehorns in African ancestry for Margaret of Anjou, I don't see how this is significantly different than casting short, dark haired, skinny Jonathan Rhys Meyers as King Henry VIII.
I thought it was traditional for tell stories full of propaganda for one cause or another. At least, that seems to be the view of such people as 'The Richard the Third Society' who feel that a re-assessment of the authorised version would not go amiss.

Perhaps the BBC, like Shakespeare have a particular audience in mind that they are looking to pander to.

As in most of these cases, I'll vote with my <insert currency denomination here>, or attention, with the (perhaps) vain hope that the market will provide.

And I'll not be telling people lacking in the appropriate amount of Anglo-Saxon ancestry (or Norman) that they should be staying in their country lane.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#9161

by John D » Fri Jan 24, 2020 5:16 am

A show that is incredibly bad and yet very entertaining. "9-1-1 Lone Star"

My wife loves this kind of stuff and she puts up with me laughing the whole time she watches. I try to keep it to a minimum... but I can't help myself.

It is a disaster porn show with firefighters who are.... vain metro male (Rob Lowe), Mary Sue woman (Liv Tyler), FTM Trans black, female Muslim (complete with head covering), rowdy gay druggie, White male with PTSD.....

I call the show "9-1-1 Woke"... and my wife asks me what that means. Haha.

Top