You are really grasping now. The NYT article didn't contradict anything I said. I don't worship the NYT, they are a reasonably relable source but they aren't infallible. They have long had journalists from the left and the right. The big screwup you are talking about about 14 years ago was one of their conservative reporters, Judith Miller, that now works for Fox News (which you worship :P ) and she took that information from Dick Cheney, not from the CIA. You just can't get your facts straight can you?Clarence wrote: ↑To use your favorite source against you. When even the NYT (which you seem to worship despite their Shenanigans in the 2nd Gulf War -strangely enough, being too deferential and not suspicious enough of the Intelligence Community hhhmmm I'm starting to see a pattern- where they basically had a reporter that took politicized CIA content as fact) admits that The Democrats lawfirm - acting on behalf of Clinton and the DNC -hired a 'dig up dirt for money' company and used that to create a Dossier at least part of which was used for a FISA surveillance request on a US Citizen well, I needn't spell things out for you.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ Clarence wrote:So why did you link to them in post 575. :lol: :lol: :lol:Like I said, using the NYT as a source on ANYTHING Trump is a bad idea.
But it turns out that you agree with me that the Steele Dossier is a political construct, so I really had no need.
As for info in the dossier being used by the FBI, as long as it was accurate what is the problem.
A political construct? I'm not sure what you mean by that. It was political research, but that doesn't necessarily mean it was true, false, or anything in between. If you think that I agree with you on the Steele dossier was biased, you would be wrong, as usual.