Re: The Trump Dump!
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 5:43 pm
Only one has trolling as one of many KPIs
Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/
I love the conservative obsession with AOC. Despised by actual Democratic leaders and clear outliers in the party, for the distraction-from-Trump's-stupidity crowd, she's a wonder horse. This is a disingenuous whataboutism wherein suddenly she is the face of the Democrats. Pretty amazeballs if you ask me.
:lol:Trump announced the move in a rambling, free-associative appearance in the White House Rose Garden that was more MAGA rally than presidential announcement. Even by the standards of this president, his remarks were confusing, untruthful, and often off topic, with strange ad-hominem attacks on other politicians and sharp exchanges with reporters. Despite claiming that the nation faces an acute crisis that requires immediate attention, the president meandered through a long preamble about trade deals and North Korea. When he finally got to the point, he struggled to stay focused.
“We’re going to be signing today and registering national emergency,” he said. “And it’s a great thing to do, because we have an invasion of drugs, invasion of gangs, invasion of people, and it’s unacceptable. And by signing the national emergency, something signed many times by other presidents, many, many times, President Obama, in fact, we may be using one of the national emergencies that he signed having to do with cartels, criminal cartels. It’s a very good emergency that he signed … And what we really want to do is simple. It’s not like it is complicated. It’s very simple. We want to stop drugs from coming into our country. We want to stop criminals and gangs from coming into our country. Nobody has done the job that we have ever done.”
Between Jihadies and Commies the Dems have erected all three rings.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑I love the conservative obsession with AOC. Despised by actual Democratic leaders and clear outliers in the party, for the distraction-from-Trump's-stupidity crowd, she's a wonder horse. This is a disingenuous whataboutism wherein suddenly she is the face of the Democrats. Pretty amazeballs if you ask me.
So let's indulge thos whataboutism by looking at Republican Representatives stupidity. But because that's such a broad, deep topic, could you nail down what aspect you'd most like? We have science denialism, Christian family values actually screwing male prostitutes, insane economic theories, blatant lying, nepotism, bribery, political vengeance, philandering, and incest. I'm sure I've left out a few as well, choose your vice, and there's a Republican scandal to match! So then we'll pretend that they're the face of Republicans and laugh at the insanity of the whole party, as they're clearly represented by the nutty outliers.
Or, you know, just not. It's dishonest and simply an attempt to score "points" in a stupid game. Both parties have insane outliers, as that's the nature of the beast.
There seems to be an inverse correlation between the use of teleprompters /beatific beaming at the cameras - and decision making.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ Or let's look at Trump's own words from his speech last Friday.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... on/582904/:lol:Trump announced the move in a rambling, free-associative appearance in the White House Rose Garden that was more MAGA rally than presidential announcement. Even by the standards of this president, his remarks were confusing, untruthful, and often off topic, with strange ad-hominem attacks on other politicians and sharp exchanges with reporters. Despite claiming that the nation faces an acute crisis that requires immediate attention, the president meandered through a long preamble about trade deals and North Korea. When he finally got to the point, he struggled to stay focused.
“We’re going to be signing today and registering national emergency,” he said. “And it’s a great thing to do, because we have an invasion of drugs, invasion of gangs, invasion of people, and it’s unacceptable. And by signing the national emergency, something signed many times by other presidents, many, many times, President Obama, in fact, we may be using one of the national emergencies that he signed having to do with cartels, criminal cartels. It’s a very good emergency that he signed … And what we really want to do is simple. It’s not like it is complicated. It’s very simple. We want to stop drugs from coming into our country. We want to stop criminals and gangs from coming into our country. Nobody has done the job that we have ever done.”
Sigh. You never tire of your game, do you?Brive1987 wrote: ↑Between Jihadies and Commies the Dems have erected all three rings.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑I love the conservative obsession with AOC. Despised by actual Democratic leaders and clear outliers in the party, for the distraction-from-Trump's-stupidity crowd, she's a wonder horse. This is a disingenuous whataboutism wherein suddenly she is the face of the Democrats. Pretty amazeballs if you ask me.
So let's indulge thos whataboutism by looking at Republican Representatives stupidity. But because that's such a broad, deep topic, could you nail down what aspect you'd most like? We have science denialism, Christian family values actually screwing male prostitutes, insane economic theories, blatant lying, nepotism, bribery, political vengeance, philandering, and incest. I'm sure I've left out a few as well, choose your vice, and there's a Republican scandal to match! So then we'll pretend that they're the face of Republicans and laugh at the insanity of the whole party, as they're clearly represented by the nutty outliers.
Or, you know, just not. It's dishonest and simply an attempt to score "points" in a stupid game. Both parties have insane outliers, as that's the nature of the beast.
Then we have the Presidential nominees and their bum-fight to be the most weird. :burn:
The sooner Biden declares and turns his hose on the crazies the better. Though I guess he gets to inherit one clown as running mate. Which makes his 76 years (and counting) cause for sober consideration.
Jesus he won his first office the year man stepped on the moon and Nixon was elected. Old white male indeed. Heads will explode.
Lets do Louis Gohmert (R-Tx) (as presented in a Houston Chronicle article):CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑I love the conservative obsession with AOC. Despised by actual Democratic leaders and clear outliers in the party, for the distraction-from-Trump's-stupidity crowd, she's a wonder horse. This is a disingenuous whataboutism wherein suddenly she is the face of the Democrats. Pretty amazeballs if you ask me.
So let's indulge thos whataboutism by looking at Republican Representatives stupidity. But because that's such a broad, deep topic, could you nail down what aspect you'd most like? We have science denialism, Christian family values actually screwing male prostitutes, insane economic theories, blatant lying, nepotism, bribery, political vengeance, philandering, and incest. I'm sure I've left out a few as well, choose your vice, and there's a Republican scandal to match! So then we'll pretend that they're the face of Republicans and laugh at the insanity of the whole party, as they're clearly represented by the nutty outliers.
Or, you know, just not. It's dishonest and simply an attempt to score "points" in a stupid game. Both parties have insane outliers, as that's the nature of the beast.
It’s cliched that you didn’t go with how dare you think all democratic socialists are communists
Your confusion doesn’t confuse me. I’d expect nothing less.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ I'm surprised Brive hasn't fallen in with Qanon yet.
Surprise =/= Confusion.Brive1987 wrote: ↑Your confusion doesn’t confuse me. I’d expect nothing less.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ I'm surprised Brive hasn't fallen in with Qanon yet.
:naughty:
I would have taken you as a number 2 “please sir, can I use the word to be defined in the definition” kind of guy. :)CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Surprise =/= Confusion.Brive1987 wrote: ↑Your confusion doesn’t confuse me. I’d expect nothing less.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ I'm surprised Brive hasn't fallen in with Qanon yet.
:naughty:
surprise noun
sur·prise | \ sər-ˈprīz , sə-\
variants: or less commonly surprize
Definition of surprise (Entry 1 of 3)
1a : an attack made without warning
b : a taking unawares
2 : something that surprises
3 : the feeling caused by something unexpected or unusual
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/surprise
I'll take number three, thanks.
Worst scripted speech ever. It almost reads like a natural conversation. His audience must have been appalled.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ https...://mobile.twitter.com/ddale8/status/1097199478627598336
Brilliant, isn't it? At least he sorta, kinda likes dogs.
It sounds a lot like my father-in-law, and he has dementia. It does not sound...presidential.Brive1987 wrote: ↑Worst scripted speech ever. It almost reads like a natural conversation. His audience must have been appalled.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ https...://mobile.twitter.com/ddale8/status/1097199478627598336
Brilliant, isn't it? At least he sorta, kinda likes dogs.
Reads like the transcript of a BBQ conversation. Occurring between two friends. So yeah. Not Presidential.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑It sounds a lot like my father-in-law, and he has dementia. It does not sound...presidential.Brive1987 wrote: ↑Worst scripted speech ever. It almost reads like a natural conversation. His audience must have been appalled.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ https...://mobile.twitter.com/ddale8/status/1097199478627598336
Brilliant, isn't it? At least he sorta, kinda likes dogs.
Remember when Stuckey (sp?) did that AOC “interview”. And the libs lost their minds because it didn’t have “satire” plastered all over it?
Me neither. I guess we libs were so badly triggered we got stress amnesia. :drool:No, I can't seem to recall this.
Looks like it.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑Me neither. I guess we libs were so badly triggered we got stress amnesia. :drool:No, I can't seem to recall this.
The only one of those lib sources I read is the Wapo, and I couldn't evaluate the article you posted b/c paywall.Brive1987 wrote: ↑Looks like it.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑Me neither. I guess we libs were so badly triggered we got stress amnesia. :drool:No, I can't seem to recall this.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/24/1760 ... atire-news
https://theintercept.com/2018/07/24/con ... ez-satire/
https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/ ... opponents/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... 46dc0dcdc9
I may be mistaken but didn't Rebecca Watson kind of not support and kind of made it known Stollz and her weren't friends? I could be wrong and it doesn't matter.
You don’t need to explain falling outside the informed liberal loop. It’s ok.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑The only one of those lib sources I read is the Wapo, and I couldn't evaluate the article you posted b/c paywall.Brive1987 wrote: ↑Looks like it.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑Me neither. I guess we libs were so badly triggered we got stress amnesia. :drool:No, I can't seem to recall this.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/24/1760 ... atire-news
https://theintercept.com/2018/07/24/con ... ez-satire/
https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/ ... opponents/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... 46dc0dcdc9
In fact I've only heard of and looked at is The Intercept rather than the other 2, and I find Glenn Greenwald to be a demented anti liberal that worships socialist and other dictators, or at least will never criticize them.
This is getting nearly as bad as trying to tell an intersectional feminist that not all men are bad.
I’m anti anti-vax.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ Also, I'd really like to know where you stand on Trump's anti-vax and climate demialism.
Nothing horrifies the intelligentsia more than President Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change. But, based on new information on China’s emissions, it increasingly looks like the president made the right call.
https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-envi ... -agreementChina is key. It is by far the world’s biggest source of carbon emissions, producing more than one quarter of the global total and 81 percent more than the United States. The U.S. is the second-largest; India a distant third.
Unlike China, emissions from the United States have trended lower in recent years. The peak occurred in 2005; overall net emissions in 2016 were 12.1-percent lower than in 2005, and the International Energy Agency reports another drop in 2017.
Ive got no idea where this negativity from McCabe or distrust from Trump might be coming from.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑
I wonder what would cause that? Disregarding the most extensive intelligence service in the world for a for of the U.S.? Weird, huh?
The former acting director of the FBI has become the first public official to publicly confirm US government officials held meetings to discuss the option of removing Donald Trump from the presidency in the days after James Comey was fired.
Andrew McCabe, fired as deputy FBI director last March, told US 60 Minutes that following the removal of Mr Comey as FBI director in May 2017, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) met to discuss whether the vice president and Cabinet members could be gathered to remove Mr Trump under the US Constitution's 25th Amendment.
Double posts are usually a mistake.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ So, every liberal, huh? You have to know this is a disengenous game, and that nutpicking and guilt by association isn't going to end well.
Explain how everyone on the liberal side is inextricably in lockstep, but there's an exceedingly fine distinction on the right, wherein one can clearly delineate between Lauren Southern and the MAGAbomber. Moderate Democrats and moderate Republicans have more in common with each other than either does with AOC or Steve King. Yet you choose to ignore this in favor of demonizing one side, whilst playing No-True-Scotsman for your team. Just so you know, this smacks of tribal thinking.
You sound very dour today. RUOK?Brive said: See? Every single one of them. Not a lib that didn’t go ‘tard.
But in all seriousness, there was a sufficient breadth of dogpile as to form an acceptable liberal media consensus.
It was McCabe's duty to discuss this, as he didn't swear an oath to uphold the POTUS, but rather the constitution. This was entirely lawful, indeed necessary. There's a good deal of evidence that Trump is compromised by the Russians. That's kinda the FBI's wheelhouse.Brive1987 wrote: ↑Ive got no idea where this negativity from McCabe or distrust from Trump might be coming from.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑
I wonder what would cause that? Disregarding the most extensive intelligence service in the world for a for of the U.S.? Weird, huh?
The former acting director of the FBI has become the first public official to publicly confirm US government officials held meetings to discuss the option of removing Donald Trump from the presidency in the days after James Comey was fired.
Andrew McCabe, fired as deputy FBI director last March, told US 60 Minutes that following the removal of Mr Comey as FBI director in May 2017, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) met to discuss whether the vice president and Cabinet members could be gathered to remove Mr Trump under the US Constitution's 25th Amendment.
Oh, dear gods. "The Hill" isn't left-leaning, and that opinion piece you posted was from a Fox News contributor and full-on conservative. "The Hill" only seems left-leaning to somebody that thinks anything critical/factual about Trump automatically makes it a leftist rag.Brive1987 wrote: ↑I’m anti anti-vax.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ Also, I'd really like to know where you stand on Trump's anti-vax and climate demialism.
And I’m horrified that the vaccines kids need to go to daycare and school are federally mandated. When did that happen?
Im also horrified that all the amazing work done over 8 years and rammed through both houses by Obama will be wiped.
Actually it’s a pity Obama waited so long (2014) to even start on the CPP. And that it’s continued relevance required a Hillary in the White House.
Obama may not have been a denier (though Trump has since walked back the concept of ‘hoax’) - but he definitely didn’t make it a priority. Which produced a similar outcome.
But ignore me. As usual. So here is the high trust, left leaning take from “The Hill”.
Nothing horrifies the intelligentsia more than President Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change. But, based on new information on China’s emissions, it increasingly looks like the president made the right call.https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-envi ... -agreementChina is key. It is by far the world’s biggest source of carbon emissions, producing more than one quarter of the global total and 81 percent more than the United States. The U.S. is the second-largest; India a distant third.
Unlike China, emissions from the United States have trended lower in recent years. The peak occurred in 2005; overall net emissions in 2016 were 12.1-percent lower than in 2005, and the International Energy Agency reports another drop in 2017.
While we are discussing foibles. I don’t like Trump’s approach to his marriage vows.
And his hair is weird. And apparently his penis looks like a mushroom. Plus he eats two scoops of ice cream, and can’t apply tan very well. Finally what’s with his long ties?
Impeach.
I did my pre-checks.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Oh, dear gods. "The Hill" isn't left-leaning, and that opinion piece you posted was from a Fox News contributor and full-on conservative. "The Hill" only seems left-leaning to somebody that thinks anything critical/factual about Trump automatically makes it a leftist rag.Brive1987 wrote: ↑I’m anti anti-vax.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ Also, I'd really like to know where you stand on Trump's anti-vax and climate demialism.
And I’m horrified that the vaccines kids need to go to daycare and school are federally mandated. When did that happen?
Im also horrified that all the amazing work done over 8 years and rammed through both houses by Obama will be wiped.
Actually it’s a pity Obama waited so long (2014) to even start on the CPP. And that it’s continued relevance required a Hillary in the White House.
Obama may not have been a denier (though Trump has since walked back the concept of ‘hoax’) - but he definitely didn’t make it a priority. Which produced a similar outcome.
But ignore me. As usual. So here is the high trust, left leaning take from “The Hill”.
Nothing horrifies the intelligentsia more than President Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change. But, based on new information on China’s emissions, it increasingly looks like the president made the right call.https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-envi ... -agreementChina is key. It is by far the world’s biggest source of carbon emissions, producing more than one quarter of the global total and 81 percent more than the United States. The U.S. is the second-largest; India a distant third.
Unlike China, emissions from the United States have trended lower in recent years. The peak occurred in 2005; overall net emissions in 2016 were 12.1-percent lower than in 2005, and the International Energy Agency reports another drop in 2017.
While we are discussing foibles. I don’t like Trump’s approach to his marriage vows.
And his hair is weird. And apparently his penis looks like a mushroom. Plus he eats two scoops of ice cream, and can’t apply tan very well. Finally what’s with his long ties?
Impeach.
Trump is a conman. He thinks his gut is better than actual informed thinking. He, for some inexplicable reason, trusts Putin over his own intelligence agencies. It isn't a foible to be an anti-science president, it's an outright detriment, a disqualifier.
We haven't even ventured into emoluments violations yet. And election law violations. Nor has nepotism been brought up lately. Curious loans from foriegn banks.
Oh, and I'm fine, thanks for asking.
Are you seriously suggesting Stone is a kook? I guess maybe Trump was right to fire his ass back in 2015.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ https...://mobile.twitter.com/jonswaine/status/1097574608692264961
I understand the whole 25th thing is a bomb waiting to explode.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ ....
I guess we are going with serious TDS and partisan-bias as just cause eh?It also fails to define what constitutes inability, or how questions concerning inability are to be resolved
Partisan bias? The people discussing removing Trump were Republican. McCabe, Rosenstein, Sessions...all Republican. And no, medical reasons aren't the only fitness-for-office test, not by a longshot. It isn't treason to discuss the 25th and invoking it, or it would be a useless amendment. This shouldn't be hard.Brive1987 wrote: ↑I understand the whole 25th thing is a bomb waiting to explode.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ ....
I guess we are going with serious TDS and partisan-bias as just cause eh?It also fails to define what constitutes inability, or how questions concerning inability are to be resolved
In the real world, anything short of a certified medical incident constitutes probable treason. Perceived incompetence doesn’t cut it.
And to call him late at night...and suggest that his arrest was a "lynching."
The deep state tried and failed to kill Roger with polonium and blame it on Russia so now they are going to lynch him instead.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑And to call him late at night...and suggest that his arrest was a "lynching."
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nat ... 1128-story.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/29/trump-p ... -case.html
I’m more interested in whether Chinese emissions are decreasing in line with America’s. If that’s not the case I’ll thank her for the information and maybe never engage with her again. If it is the case I’ll craft a strongly worded teeet to The Hill about fake news.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liz_Peek
Here's a Peek (pun intended) at who penned that opinion piece you posted from "left" The Hill. Surprise! She's an energy consultant for the petroleum industry! Who would've guessed! And she's impressed that Trump pulled us out of the climate accord. Who would've thought that a petroleum shill would have liked that?
There's an old saying "As goes California, so goes the U.S. As goes the U.S., so goes the world." I think it was a mistake to pull out, as it gives China an out on their own emission control.Brive1987 wrote: ↑I’m more interested in whether Chinese emissions are decreasing in line with America’s. If that’s not the case I’ll thank her for the information and maybe never engage with her again. If it is the case I’ll craft a strongly worded teeet to The Hill about fake news.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liz_Peek
Here's a Peek (pun intended) at who penned that opinion piece you posted from "left" The Hill. Surprise! She's an energy consultant for the petroleum industry! Who would've guessed! And she's impressed that Trump pulled us out of the climate accord. Who would've thought that a petroleum shill would have liked that?
And never engage with her again.