Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
-
- .
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:54 am
- Location: you kay?
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
setar says:
And what's more, eating is one of the few things I regularly enjoy. I simply cannot deal with telling someone that I literally cannot eat shit (that's what reject foods are to me, shit, universally) and have them throw that back in my face as 'something that can be overcome' or shit like that. No, it can't. Not when the mere smell of foods on the reject list will always make me gag and retch. Nuh uh. Not. Fucking. Happening. If you think it can be overcome then you try sticking your face in the toilet after you take a dump, see if you can 'overcome' that.
Nope you're absolutely right setar no'one has ever 'overcome' the smell of shit, not me as a herdsman, my missus and i both changing thousands of nappies, not the guy in the sewage plant, nor the stoma nurse nor the care assistants that will one day wipe your white privileged arse as you whinge about how oppressed you were by your mother suggesting you 'try something different.'
Setar's desperate effort to fit the A+ mould is truly depressing to watch.
And what's more, eating is one of the few things I regularly enjoy. I simply cannot deal with telling someone that I literally cannot eat shit (that's what reject foods are to me, shit, universally) and have them throw that back in my face as 'something that can be overcome' or shit like that. No, it can't. Not when the mere smell of foods on the reject list will always make me gag and retch. Nuh uh. Not. Fucking. Happening. If you think it can be overcome then you try sticking your face in the toilet after you take a dump, see if you can 'overcome' that.
Nope you're absolutely right setar no'one has ever 'overcome' the smell of shit, not me as a herdsman, my missus and i both changing thousands of nappies, not the guy in the sewage plant, nor the stoma nurse nor the care assistants that will one day wipe your white privileged arse as you whinge about how oppressed you were by your mother suggesting you 'try something different.'
Setar's desperate effort to fit the A+ mould is truly depressing to watch.
-
- .
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:49 am
- Location: The Penumbra of Doubt
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
That link is coming up as "Sorry, that page doesn't exist" from Twitter. Problem?welch wrote:Well duh, of course it's okay if the threat is from the "proper" people.Guest wrote:Apparently not all threats are equal.
Surprise, surprise, no rebuke from Ophelia.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Phil, we don't need you or Louis to explain the use of snark against creationists. Many of us here have a history of posting on similar sites and don't have a problem with it in principle (but the person has to be able to back up their arguments and not simply use smugness as a smokescreen: the jury is still out on Louis's stint here). The problem is, when that snark and mockery -that many of us learned from the same source as Louis!- is directed at the FtB/Skepchick crowd, then it's suddenly considered OMG CYBERSTALKING AND VIBRATING HATRED OF WOMEN!! That's what sticks in the craw of many people about this, I'd warrant.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: So you guys can think all you want about Louis' character in light of his excursion here, but I will stand by what I previously said about him. I don't know, maybe you should have known him for as long as I have (since 2008 AE's AtBC) to get where he's coming from. What some of you might consider pompousness and smug patronizing, I've seen from being on his side of the argument, and it never bothered me at the time. It was efficient against IDists and creationists, and most of all it was entertaining and funny. I still read him like that, even on those issues where we strongly disagree. And I guess maybe that's what's going on with him WRT Myers.
-
- .
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:54 am
- Location: you kay?
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
rocko this food thread could be worth a dramatic read;) I'm lulzing hard.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Now Setar, there are children in India who'd love those vegetables. Why don't you just give them a try, eh?
Urrggghhh... Well why don't you fucking give them it then, mum. I literally cannot eat your shit reject food.
Urrggghhh... Well why don't you fucking give them it then, mum. I literally cannot eat your shit reject food.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Anyone that isn't CSI. They sure as fuck aren't spending their money on that shitHoneyWagon wrote:OMG, this is rich.
Apparently, WISCON is either run by misogynists or the patriarchy is preventing baby-sitting at this con.
Of all conferences, I would have thought THIS one would have childcare.
I guess they don't give a fuck about moms or something.
http://i.imgur.com/nDLJo0k.png
Who is Melody expecting a grant from?????
-
- .
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:57 am
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
What the raging cuntfuck are you on about?AndrewV69 wrote: Looking at the answer provided by Lewis and the post by Oneiros666 above yours reminds me of the topic of academic mobbing written about by Kenneth Westhues, and his opinions on conflicting modes of discourse, which he labels as modern and postmodern.
*SNIP*
Which to my mind is typical baboon behaviour. Note that I am not saying that Lewis is a typical baboon (not yet anyway).
You try to equate A+theism and the Slymepit's campaign against them with radical students at universities "mobbing" their professors in the sixties? The hell? And then proceeds to call me a baboon. That's your prerogative, and it's my prerogative to say go suck a donkey's cock.
I have no, I repeat, no intention of taking A+theism plus seriously anymore. I tried to debate them rationally and was treated much the same way as everyone else who has tried: By fucking insanity and cult-behaviour. A+theism and FftB are ruining the good name of atheism that we were finally on the way of creating (i.e. making atheism mainstream). Those fuckers are encouraging the myth that atheism=>communism/radical feminism/etc that the fundies have been scaring the american populace with for over 60 years.
So I say again: Fuck those fuckers to the ground. Hard.
-
- .
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:54 am
- Location: you kay?
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
http://www.twitter.com/Nikephorius
that should work Cowherd.
that should work Cowherd.
-
- .
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:24 am
- Location: Sitting with feet up
- Contact:
Re: utterly non negotiable
Oh but you got to have some sympathy? Isn't this a problem most forums face? Doesn't the slymepit attract vegans coming here preaching?Apples wrote:Y U R WIPING KASSIANE'S ASS RONG AGAIN?
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3720
And the lulz continue from there.Kassiane wrote: If you're here to preach veganism read this first.
This has happened a few times. And everytime it does, it ends up being a whole steaming pile of angry because generally, the preaching is a bunch of ableist, classist BS (whether you're aware that you're speaking from privilege is irrellevant. I'm getting there).
So. Before you go there, a challenge for you: Make a vegan diet plan that meets my needs in terms of nutrition, caloric density, affordability, and ease of putting shit on a plate to eat it. This is a concrete exercise to get you actively thinking about how to concretely implement what you are saying "everyone should do" rather than just assuming everyone can do it if they try hard enough. Convince me.
Needs are utterly non negotiable, with fuckups being from very unpleasant to fatally catastrophic:
-2500-3000 calories a day
-I don't actually have that large a stomach, so this is a challenge if I'm mainlining lard.
-20g or less carbs a day (and that is pushing it), which means all but 80cal are from fat & protein
-no soy
-I'm a champion at setting things on fire. As in, have exploded safety glass.
-must be able to transport to school & work. on the bus.
-no elaborate prep, as I get confused & then pass out before I eat the food. I already work, do school, spend 4h a day on the bus, and have sequencing difficulties. Can't do it.
-if it's slimy (or stringy. or a particular kind of mushy. banana texture is right out) I can't eat it. I throw up (in my case, potentially fatally catastrophic)
-I live on SSI & student loans.
No? I wonder what it is about that place that attracts raving nutters?
Seeing Mr Kneecapping on twitter and his Scottish Nationalism reminded me of what a friend of mine in the police once told me, where ever there are protests which have the possibility to turn violent, especially when confronting the police, be it anti-capitalist, anti-nazi, anti-hunting... there are always are a hardcore that are the same old faces. But what is really interesting is that some of them just don't give a toss about the cause. Once year they can be marching with the BNP, the next with the anti-nazi league, and after that, smashing up a cafe in Spain with a load of West Ham supporters.
Some people just love agro.
Re: Atheism (less) Child Care
Nah. That's the excuse of someone who knows they had exactly zero intentions of providing day care saying "we are not going to provide any material support whatsoever. If someone wants to provide the full cost, including set fees, we won't stop them"Michael K Gray wrote:This revelation that the Women in Skepticism conference is NOT going to have child-care facilities has blown my lid!
I mean, WTF?
Is it an oversight?
Was it planned this way?
Are the organisers selfish lamebrains?
Did they spend money on airfares and speaker's fees in lieu of even basic child-care?
I am truly staggered and stunned that self-professed feminists neglect this vital detail!
They have the audacity to slander Richard Dawkins, (neglecting the fact that he was the first to offer and fund child-care at secular meetings, before that poisonous parasite Beccy-boo-boos (spit) "came up" with the notion and claimed that he did it because of her, the lying cunt).
"We haven't got a grant yet" is the excuse of a clueless sociopath.
Again: WTF?
They don't want kids there, kids get in the way of their drinking.
I'd have been more impressed had they said "no. This conference isn't particularly kid-friendly, and so the decision was made to not provide on-site day care."
Just be straightforward. You will always piss people off, but at least you're honest.
-
- .
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:24 am
- Location: Sitting with feet up
- Contact:
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
I retweeted it and that is gone. I guess they caught on.AnonymousCowherd wrote:That link is coming up as "Sorry, that page doesn't exist" from Twitter. Problem?welch wrote:Well duh, of course it's okay if the threat is from the "proper" people.Guest wrote:Apparently not all threats are equal.
Surprise, surprise, no rebuke from Ophelia.
-
- .
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:56 am
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Just woke up, so time for a catchup post:
@rocko2466: even better than the last! I wonder how long it will be until FTB/A+ takes notice?
Yeah, that's another problem with insults - the same set of squiggles can mean something totally different based on where in the world you are. See also: "fag" in the UK. I also wonder what they would think of "niggardly". Maybe someone should ask them :lol:Michael J wrote: (post 1227)What is hard for me is that in Australia cunt can be a term of affection as in "How 'r' ya goin' you old cunt"
Intent is not magic! Intent is not magic! INTENT IS NOT MAGIC!!!!! (what a cheap cop-out)pandora wrote:(post 1232) No-one thinks of it in gendered terms.
Putting aside the fact that it seems like recursive prophet really did accidentally misread "Sun Countess" as "Sun Princess", how is "princess" infantalizing? If anything, it's the opposite - a princess is royalty. I guess boxcutter bob finally ran out of shit to be offended by, so now he has to make something up.Shitar wrote:(quoted in 1235)not to mention, 'princess' is infantilizing as fuck, it's generally used to dismiss women's concerns. and that's getting a massive side-eye from me =/
You may or may not have seen my post about Ophelia earlier in this thread, wherein I accused her of e-begging for pity. It was really...well, harsh. But if she changed her tune, and starting posting about stuff that actually matters, without intentionally creating drama, I'd do a complete 180. But I'm not holding my breath either.surreptitious57 wrote:(post 1268)I see that Ophelia has stated that she is very tired of all the misogyny and how it affects her, because blogging is her livelihood and it just is not possible therefore to turn away from it now. This is a common theme, what with Rebecca and Jennifer and Natalie all referencing the same frustrations. No one should have to put up with this nonsense. Attacking ideas is fine but attacking individuals is not and it obviously is affecting then psychologically. Rebecca once suggested she had doubts about going on because it was affecting the quality of her life. Well fair enough but I would urge anyone who is challenging misogyny - or any prejudice - and who is in the public arena to carry on now, because this has got to stop and the only way to do that is by routinely and actively condemning it now. So do I and unequivocally too
But it might also help if there was more dialogue between those who were only interested in debate and not abuse. Because maybe it would filter out to everyone else. If wishes were horses, I know, but there are some of us who think it is possible to engage without all the drama too. In the meantime, I will give my full support to Ophelia in hoping she can carry on. Now I do not agree with everything she says, but that does not mean that I cannot engage with her as a human being nonetheless. I hope she hangs in there now, and does not allow intimidation to affect her. I know I once said something to her that was serious but I no longer engage like that now. But this continuous onslaught makes me wonder where herself and the others get all their energy from. I wish them all the best now and look forward to the day when everyone in the atheist online community can come together as human beings and not as cyber enemies, like at present but as I always say when I mention this - I will not be holding my breath on that unfortunately
@rocko2466: even better than the last! I wonder how long it will be until FTB/A+ takes notice?
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
http://talkrational.org/mysmiliesvb/mysmilie_148.gifTigzy wrote:http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 600#p65222
I'm pointing to the hidden smiley. The hidden smiley which is animated to show it presenting a bunch of flowers. What got me was the apparent reason as to why it was 'spoilered':
For a fuckin smiley??Motion/Flowers allergy trigger alert.
I've reproduced it here without a trigger warning in the hopes that the combined motion and virtual pollen emanating from the screen will trigger a violent asthma/epilepsy attack and kill the baboon lurkers.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
jjbinx007 wrote:Surprised more people haven't commentated on this:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... -you-keep/
But let's put that to one side and talk about modesty:Watch this. I think Atheism Plus is heavily mishandled and it’s pure utilisation of safe zones makes debate and discourse impossible. In addition it takes a very very protectionist attitude to both culture and a purely western attitude towards feminism which is simply not universal or applicable in every situation. However due to the lack of any actual method of discourse there is no way to create active change through it. It is unfortunately a pure academic form of feminism and is unsuitable for punching out gender discrepancies in third world nations. It’s participants have little actual experience in field work and from experience are unwilling to defer to anyone who is outside the sphere of their security nor were they willing to grasp that principles are great if you can afford to have them. I have even spoken out explicitly against their cultural/race aspect of their movement because a lot of it tries to paint culture with a big fuck off brush rather than realising individual nuance.
:dance:You want to know something funny? At no point has anyone ever thrown themselves at me because of my degrees. It’s always been because of my winning personality and sense of humour.
I kind of did comment on it. Right there.
-
- .
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:49 am
- Location: The Penumbra of Doubt
Re: utterly non negotiable
Excellent. No carbs, because you wouldn't want to get fat(ter) on your 3000 cal/day, which you so need to lead the exhausting life of a student. At least you don't seem to have any need for boring stuff like vitamins, minerals yada yada.Apples wrote:Y U R WIPING KASSIANE'S ASS RONG AGAIN?
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3720
And the lulz continue from there.Kassiane wrote: If you're here to preach veganism read this first.
This has happened a few times. And everytime it does, it ends up being a whole steaming pile of angry because generally, the preaching is a bunch of ableist, classist BS (whether you're aware that you're speaking from privilege is irrellevant. I'm getting there).
So. Before you go there, a challenge for you: Make a vegan diet plan that meets my needs in terms of nutrition, caloric density, affordability, and ease of putting shit on a plate to eat it. This is a concrete exercise to get you actively thinking about how to concretely implement what you are saying "everyone should do" rather than just assuming everyone can do it if they try hard enough. Convince me.
Needs are utterly non negotiable, with fuckups being from very unpleasant to fatally catastrophic:
-2500-3000 calories a day
-I don't actually have that large a stomach, so this is a challenge if I'm mainlining lard.
-20g or less carbs a day (and that is pushing it), which means all but 80cal are from fat & protein
-no soy
-I'm a champion at setting things on fire. As in, have exploded safety glass.
-must be able to transport to school & work. on the bus.
-no elaborate prep, as I get confused & then pass out before I eat the food. I already work, do school, spend 4h a day on the bus, and have sequencing difficulties. Can't do it.
-if it's slimy (or stringy. or a particular kind of mushy. banana texture is right out) I can't eat it. I throw up (in my case, potentially fatally catastrophic)
-I live on SSI & student loans.
Mainlining lard alternative? - chug a nice half litre bot of olive oil instead (4000 cal) or, better still, rape seed oil (why give in to hipster pretension now?). It's still fat, but you may be able to "negotiate" about five minutes more life from your clogged arteries. Do arteries negotiate?
Clearly, someone's Mumsy didn't make her litte Pooh-pooh eat his broccoli.
Re: utterly non negotiable
OMG that is a thread that keeps on giving - I haven't laughed so hard all week :lol:Apples wrote:
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3720
And the lulz continue from there.Kassiane wrote: -I'm a champion at setting things on fire. As in, have exploded safety glass.
-no elaborate prep, as I get confused & then pass out before I eat the food. I already work, do school, spend 4h a day on the bus, and have sequencing difficulties. Can't do it.
-if it's slimy (or stringy. or a particular kind of mushy. banana texture is right out) I can't eat it. I throw up (in my case, potentially fatally catastrophic)
-I live on SSI & student loans.
some A-plussers are a little more plus than others
What is socialism and how would it work?
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... &start=100
In which the A-plussers discuss how they are going to overthrow capitalism, turn all corporations into worker-owned co-ops, and abolish manager/employee hierarchies. If you have any doubts about the feasibility of this scheme, Setar and Ceepolk will re-educate -- I mean enlighten -- you.
Which dovetails nicely with Setar's explanation, in the catastrophic Mods thread, of the super seekrit forums (A+Stasi meets the Viper Room's VIP area).
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... start=1625
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... &start=100
In which the A-plussers discuss how they are going to overthrow capitalism, turn all corporations into worker-owned co-ops, and abolish manager/employee hierarchies. If you have any doubts about the feasibility of this scheme, Setar and Ceepolk will re-educate -- I mean enlighten -- you.
Which dovetails nicely with Setar's explanation, in the catastrophic Mods thread, of the super seekrit forums (A+Stasi meets the Viper Room's VIP area).
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... start=1625
Setar wrote:... and to continue with that analogy, having a 'secret forum' is like having a few friends, some who happen to be police, over at your house for drinks every Friday night and talking about stuff. some of that stuff might have to do with potential crimes or suspicions. ...
... honestly this seems to me like a similar line as to when society gets all up in arms over, say, Miley Cyrus or Micheal Phelps taking bong hits because they're "role models". yeah, and they also have private lives. you don't get to police their private lives just because they're famous and people look up to them for their achievements in one small part of their life that has been brought out of 'private' because of what they achieved =/
Re: utterly non negotiable
AnonymousCowherd wrote:Excellent. No carbs, because you wouldn't want to get fat(ter) on your 3000 cal/day, which you so need to lead the exhausting life of a student. At least you don't seem to have any need for boring stuff like vitamins, minerals yada yada.Apples wrote:Y U R WIPING KASSIANE'S ASS RONG AGAIN?
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3720
And the lulz continue from there.Kassiane wrote: If you're here to preach veganism read this first.
This has happened a few times. And everytime it does, it ends up being a whole steaming pile of angry because generally, the preaching is a bunch of ableist, classist BS (whether you're aware that you're speaking from privilege is irrellevant. I'm getting there).
So. Before you go there, a challenge for you: Make a vegan diet plan that meets my needs in terms of nutrition, caloric density, affordability, and ease of putting shit on a plate to eat it. This is a concrete exercise to get you actively thinking about how to concretely implement what you are saying "everyone should do" rather than just assuming everyone can do it if they try hard enough. Convince me.
Needs are utterly non negotiable, with fuckups being from very unpleasant to fatally catastrophic:
-2500-3000 calories a day
-I don't actually have that large a stomach, so this is a challenge if I'm mainlining lard.
-20g or less carbs a day (and that is pushing it), which means all but 80cal are from fat & protein
-no soy
-I'm a champion at setting things on fire. As in, have exploded safety glass.
-must be able to transport to school & work. on the bus.
-no elaborate prep, as I get confused & then pass out before I eat the food. I already work, do school, spend 4h a day on the bus, and have sequencing difficulties. Can't do it.
-if it's slimy (or stringy. or a particular kind of mushy. banana texture is right out) I can't eat it. I throw up (in my case, potentially fatally catastrophic)
-I live on SSI & student loans.
Mainlining lard alternative? - chug a nice half litre bot of olive oil instead (4000 cal) or, better still, rape seed oil (why give in to hipster pretension now?). It's still fat, but you may be able to "negotiate" about five minutes more life from your clogged arteries. Do arteries negotiate?
Clearly, someone's Mumsy didn't make her litte Pooh-pooh eat his broccoli.
I'd ask if kassiepane could whine more, but I already know the answer. I actually am allergic to about four foods. Not a peanut kind of allergy, where I'm instantly reactive to minuscule amount, but eating them is a very bad idea. So when I see them on my plate, I just nudge them off to one side and go on with my eating. I see no need to yell at whomever put them there. If I had a sever peanut allergy, and I was going to someone's house for dinner, I'd let them know ahead of time. If my allergies were going to potentially fuck up the entire program, I'd ask if we could do this another night, or at my place.
In other words, I don't think the entire world needs to cater to my needs more than the amount needed to not actively try to kill me. As it turns out, that's pretty easy.
But then, my parents didn't raise me to think I was the center of the fucking universe. Fucking self-esteem movement.
Re: utterly non negotiable
Plan B:AnonymousCowherd wrote:[spoiler][/spoiler]Apples wrote:Y U R WIPING KASSIANE'S ASS RONG AGAIN?
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3720
And the lulz continue from there.Kassiane wrote: If you're here to preach veganism read this first.
This has happened a few times. And everytime it does, it ends up being a whole steaming pile of angry because generally, the preaching is a bunch of ableist, classist BS (whether you're aware that you're speaking from privilege is irrellevant. I'm getting there).
So. Before you go there, a challenge for you: Make a vegan diet plan that meets my needs in terms of nutrition, caloric density, affordability, and ease of putting shit on a plate to eat it. This is a concrete exercise to get you actively thinking about how to concretely implement what you are saying "everyone should do" rather than just assuming everyone can do it if they try hard enough. Convince me.
Needs are utterly non negotiable, with fuckups being from very unpleasant to fatally catastrophic:
-2500-3000 calories a day
-I don't actually have that large a stomach, so this is a challenge if I'm mainlining lard.
-20g or less carbs a day (and that is pushing it), which means all but 80cal are from fat & protein
-no soy
-I'm a champion at setting things on fire. As in, have exploded safety glass.
-must be able to transport to school & work. on the bus.
-no elaborate prep, as I get confused & then pass out before I eat the food. I already work, do school, spend 4h a day on the bus, and have sequencing difficulties. Can't do it.
-if it's slimy (or stringy. or a particular kind of mushy. banana texture is right out) I can't eat it. I throw up (in my case, potentially fatally catastrophic)
-I live on SSI & student loans.
Excellent. No carbs, because you wouldn't want to get fat(ter) on your 3000 cal/day, which you so need to lead the exhausting life of a student. At least you don't seem to have any need for boring stuff like vitamins, minerals yada yada.
Mainlining lard alternative? - chug a nice half litre bot of olive oil instead (4000 cal) or, better still, rape seed oil (why give in to hipster pretension now?). It's still fat, but you may be able to "negotiate" about five minutes more life from your clogged arteries. Do arteries negotiate?
Clearly, someone's Mumsy didn't make her litte Pooh-pooh eat his broccoli.
[spoiler]http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploa ... e-else.jpg[/spoiler]
Re: utterly non negotiable
I love your last line. It's so true. It's what I talk about when I talk about toxic people. They're actively looking for the conflict, and if they can't find it, they'll make it.VickyCaramel wrote:Oh but you got to have some sympathy? Isn't this a problem most forums face? Doesn't the slymepit attract vegans coming here preaching?Apples wrote:Y U R WIPING KASSIANE'S ASS RONG AGAIN?
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3720
And the lulz continue from there.Kassiane wrote: If you're here to preach veganism read this first.
This has happened a few times. And everytime it does, it ends up being a whole steaming pile of angry because generally, the preaching is a bunch of ableist, classist BS (whether you're aware that you're speaking from privilege is irrellevant. I'm getting there).
So. Before you go there, a challenge for you: Make a vegan diet plan that meets my needs in terms of nutrition, caloric density, affordability, and ease of putting shit on a plate to eat it. This is a concrete exercise to get you actively thinking about how to concretely implement what you are saying "everyone should do" rather than just assuming everyone can do it if they try hard enough. Convince me.
Needs are utterly non negotiable, with fuckups being from very unpleasant to fatally catastrophic:
-2500-3000 calories a day
-I don't actually have that large a stomach, so this is a challenge if I'm mainlining lard.
-20g or less carbs a day (and that is pushing it), which means all but 80cal are from fat & protein
-no soy
-I'm a champion at setting things on fire. As in, have exploded safety glass.
-must be able to transport to school & work. on the bus.
-no elaborate prep, as I get confused & then pass out before I eat the food. I already work, do school, spend 4h a day on the bus, and have sequencing difficulties. Can't do it.
-if it's slimy (or stringy. or a particular kind of mushy. banana texture is right out) I can't eat it. I throw up (in my case, potentially fatally catastrophic)
-I live on SSI & student loans.
No? I wonder what it is about that place that attracts raving nutters?
Seeing Mr Kneecapping on twitter and his Scottish Nationalism reminded me of what a friend of mine in the police once told me, where ever there are protests which have the possibility to turn violent, especially when confronting the police, be it anti-capitalist, anti-nazi, anti-hunting... there are always are a hardcore that are the same old faces. But what is really interesting is that some of them just don't give a toss about the cause. Once year they can be marching with the BNP, the next with the anti-nazi league, and after that, smashing up a cafe in Spain with a load of West Ham supporters.
Some people just love agro.
There's a bunch of things in the world that piss me off. Gender/Neofeminism, Econ 101 (and supply-side economics in general), Religious Privilege, etc. But Political Veganism/Vegitarianism?
That shit is PERSONAL. Without going too deeply into it, I think it's highly dangerous/destructive. Truth is, for some people that type of diet has very significant health risks, but the Political V/V people downplay that entirely, which is a massive problem because they're the ones that should be doing the proper education. The ideology is more important that people's health and well-being.
That's twisted.
Truth be told, I almost lost my wife because of it. The reality is that she's lost a decade of her life to chronic illness because of it. (She also lost her mother to it). So yeah.
And BTW, I don't understand why people are so shocked about the lack of child care at WISC. I would have expected that, given that it's a conference built around massive amounts of entitlement seeking by middle/upper class individuals who have the resources to make such a trip, and as such probably don't need any sort of support for child-care. They're not really trying to attract local women, I don't think, to come down and join them.
-
- .
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:49 am
- Location: The Penumbra of Doubt
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Cheers,jim.jimthepleb wrote:http://www.twitter.com/Nikephorius
that should work Cowherd.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
It's the level of hypocrisy that still has the power to shock.And BTW, I don't understand why people are so shocked about the lack of child care at WISC. I would have expected that, given that it's a conference built around massive amounts of entitlement seeking by middle/upper class individuals who have the resources to make such a trip, and as such probably don't need any sort of support for child-care. They're not really trying to attract local women, I don't think, to come down and join them.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Food lulz at A+ forums, hilarious!!!
Kassiane needs 2500 - 3000 calories per day? Really? And throwing up is "potentially fatally catastrophic?"
Sequencing difficulties, my arse. Cowgirl up and try acting like something other than a spoiled toddler.
Kassiane needs 2500 - 3000 calories per day? Really? And throwing up is "potentially fatally catastrophic?"
Sequencing difficulties, my arse. Cowgirl up and try acting like something other than a spoiled toddler.
-
- .
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:49 am
- Location: The Penumbra of Doubt
Re: utterly non negotiable
There's some truth in that. But it also includes those coppers who pushed to the front at every demo, whipped off their numbers and slapped people to get a response so they could charge in (on horseback until the heavy left started slashing the horses legs - disgraceful, but the poor bloody horses should never have been there). I knew a couple of police who would swap shifts or even work free overtime if it meant the chance of some aggro at a demo. It all changed here when a new (more moderate) government dropped the policy of blocking demos, and instead gave them maximum priority. So they finished sooner and less people saw them. I think there is still some nostalgia for the good old days in certain circles.VickyCaramel wrote:
Oh but you got to have some sympathy? Isn't this a problem most forums face? Doesn't the slymepit attract vegans coming here preaching?
No? I wonder what it is about that place that attracts raving nutters?
Seeing Mr Kneecapping on twitter and his Scottish Nationalism reminded me of what a friend of mine in the police once told me, where ever there are protests which have the possibility to turn violent, especially when confronting the police, be it anti-capitalist, anti-nazi, anti-hunting... there are always are a hardcore that are the same old faces. But what is really interesting is that some of them just don't give a toss about the cause. Once year they can be marching with the BNP, the next with the anti-nazi league, and after that, smashing up a cafe in Spain with a load of West Ham supporters.
Some people just love agro.
-
- .
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:57 am
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
I am currently a 244 lbg man. My daily kcal intake should not exceed 2450kcal if I am to lose 0,5kg every week. In other words, to stay fat, but not gain fat, I need about 2800-2900 kcal every day. So when a girl nags about absolutely needing 2500-3000kcal every day, and if not she is in dire danger of dying; I laugh my arse off. She's just another lazy slacktivist moaning about how hard white middle-class American life is in order to feel good about not eating less and working out.BarnOwl wrote:Food lulz at A+ forums, hilarious!!!
Kassiane needs 2500 - 3000 calories per day? Really? And throwing up is "potentially fatally catastrophic?"
Sequencing difficulties, my arse. Cowgirl up and try acting like something other than a spoiled toddler.
-
- .
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:56 am
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Kassiane is an extremely large hummingbird. You're being speciesist, check your privilege!Oneiros666 wrote:I am currently a 244 lbg man. My daily kcal intake should not exceed 2450kcal if I am to lose 0,5kg every week. In other words, to stay fat, but not gain fat, I need about 2800-2900 kcal every day. So when a girl nags about absolutely needing 2500-3000kcal every day, and if not she is in dire danger of dying; I laugh my arse off. She's just another lazy slacktivist moaning about how hard white middle-class American life is in order to feel good about not eating less and working out.BarnOwl wrote:Food lulz at A+ forums, hilarious!!!
Kassiane needs 2500 - 3000 calories per day? Really? And throwing up is "potentially fatally catastrophic?"
Sequencing difficulties, my arse. Cowgirl up and try acting like something other than a spoiled toddler.
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
I'm not trying to explain anything to anyone, except for my own position WRT Louis. I am more than aware that a lot of the Pitters (most, even?) have a long experience of dealing with creationists and religionists of all stripes.windy wrote:Phil, we don't need you or Louis to explain the use of snark against creationists. Many of us here have a history of posting on similar sites and don't have a problem with it in principle (but the person has to be able to back up their arguments and not simply use smugness as a smokescreen: the jury is still out on Louis's stint here). The problem is, when that snark and mockery -that many of us learned from the same source as Louis!- is directed at the FtB/Skepchick crowd, then it's suddenly considered OMG CYBERSTALKING AND VIBRATING HATRED OF WOMEN!! That's what sticks in the craw of many people about this, I'd warrant.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: So you guys can think all you want about Louis' character in light of his excursion here, but I will stand by what I previously said about him. I don't know, maybe you should have known him for as long as I have (since 2008 AE's AtBC) to get where he's coming from. What some of you might consider pompousness and smug patronizing, I've seen from being on his side of the argument, and it never bothered me at the time. It was efficient against IDists and creationists, and most of all it was entertaining and funny. I still read him like that, even on those issues where we strongly disagree. And I guess maybe that's what's going on with him WRT Myers.
I am, more often than not, the one in need of explanations, and when it's the case I don't hesitate to ask.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
For what it's worth, I agree with you when it comes to Louis. Personally, I think it's probably just a matter of time and the breaking of some social bonds for him to move away from the SJW movement. He does seem like a well-meaning good guy who just is in a bad movement for again, mainly social/emotional reasons.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I'm not trying to explain anything to anyone, except for my own position WRT Louis. I am more than aware that a lot of the Pitters (most, even?) have a long experience of dealing with creationists and religionists of all stripes.windy wrote:Phil, we don't need you or Louis to explain the use of snark against creationists. Many of us here have a history of posting on similar sites and don't have a problem with it in principle (but the person has to be able to back up their arguments and not simply use smugness as a smokescreen: the jury is still out on Louis's stint here). The problem is, when that snark and mockery -that many of us learned from the same source as Louis!- is directed at the FtB/Skepchick crowd, then it's suddenly considered OMG CYBERSTALKING AND VIBRATING HATRED OF WOMEN!! That's what sticks in the craw of many people about this, I'd warrant.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: So you guys can think all you want about Louis' character in light of his excursion here, but I will stand by what I previously said about him. I don't know, maybe you should have known him for as long as I have (since 2008 AE's AtBC) to get where he's coming from. What some of you might consider pompousness and smug patronizing, I've seen from being on his side of the argument, and it never bothered me at the time. It was efficient against IDists and creationists, and most of all it was entertaining and funny. I still read him like that, even on those issues where we strongly disagree. And I guess maybe that's what's going on with him WRT Myers.
I am, more often than not, the one in need of explanations, and when it's the case I don't hesitate to ask.
Mob mentality is a hell of a thing.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
That's why its always good to screencap this stuff. The same idiot will no doubt be on FTB somewhere decrying the haters who threaten violence. Ophelia and PZ told him about them and they never lie, Brownian and Josh said they were subhuman and they're really good people. That's good enough. He's now very worried that somebody will turn violent. He might still need to smash some kneecaps to stop that from happening.VickyCaramel wrote:I retweeted it and that is gone. I guess they caught on.AnonymousCowherd wrote:That link is coming up as "Sorry, that page doesn't exist" from Twitter. Problem?welch wrote:Well duh, of course it's okay if the threat is from the "proper" people.Guest wrote:Apparently not all threats are equal.
Surprise, surprise, no rebuke from Ophelia.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
His writing style makes me almost certain that Louis is English too.Gefan wrote:Possibly thanks to Oolon, I always hear Louis' posts in an English accent.John Greg wrote:LOL. Spot on.If Oolon were a moderately better writer, he'd be louis.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Or he's a twat with a keyboard who feels tough typing that stuff out.He's now very worried that somebody will turn violent. He might still need to smash some kneecaps to stop that from happening.
Louis is British.
you will drink Kassiane's piss, and you will like it.
A window into Kassianus's approach, from her blog. She is basically the reason posting video links without a transcript or at least a detailed summary at A+ is a big no-no. And I think she's the one who needs to be protected from smilies. Hugs, on the other hand, must never be diverted ...welch wrote:I'd ask if kassiepane could whine more, but I already know the answer. I actually am allergic to about four foods. Not a peanut kind of allergy, where I'm instantly reactive to minuscule amount, but eating them is a very bad idea. So when I see them on my plate, I just nudge them off to one side and go on with my eating. I see no need to yell at whomever put them there.
http://timetolisten.blogspot.com/2010/1 ... pissy.html
:suimouth:Kassiane wrote:I reserve the right to be pissy.
Always.
I don't have to be 'nice' in explaining my needs. It's my right to have a number of them met. It doesn't matter if I coat in in candy or dip it in acid-it's still a need. I don't HAVE to be nice to you when your vest or your helmet or your phone charm is strobing in my face. Telling me you didn't know or you didn't think you'd come across someone for whom it's a problem isn't going to impress me; you could end the sentence at "I didn't think".
No matter how I present them, my rights are my rights. My right to not have a preventable seizure or to not be run off the sidewalk (cyclists, I'm looking at you. Well, I'm not, actually, because you're neurological hazards on wheels, and if you run into me because you thought the sidewalk was yours so help me I will end you AND your bike) or to be presented important information in a manner I can process and use or to block sounds that overwhelm me in a manner of my choosing.
My rights are my rights.
I have a right to be nice. I have a right to be snarky. My only responsibility is the one I have to myself, that of getting my needs met. I don't really care if you're offended if I'm abrupt or pissy. Your feelings are not my concern. You really have no place lecturing me on how I present my needs, especially in a situation where the only option is to do something about it now. Being nice doesn't work. Letting my snark flag fly does. Talking to you as though you're choosing to be an asshat works a lot better than assuming you are unaware. Talking to you as though you're choosing to be an asshat gets your attention. Being nice doesn't. It just makes you feel fuzzy.
It is my right to assume you're an asshat. It is my right to be pissy when you are making my brain hurt. If you decide that it's your place to Argument From Tone me about my needs, my assumption that you are an asshat is correct.
They are my rights. Nowhere among anyone's rights are included the right to not be made uncomfortable or the right to not be offended.
Those aren't your rights.
Being pissy about mine is mine, though.
Re: utterly non negotiable
The SJWs don't actually have a good defense against the radical vegans, because they agree with them that every single act should be politicised and being preached at should be used as an opportunity to "check their privilege". That's why they must try to turn the tables so that the radical vegan is actually oppressing them by asking them to eat slimy food! The rest of us omnivores can admit that the vegans have a point about the ethical issues with meat-eating, explain why we don't agree with their solution, and move on.VickyCaramel wrote: Oh but you got to have some sympathy? Isn't this a problem most forums face? Doesn't the slymepit attract vegans coming here preaching?
No? I wonder what it is about that place that attracts raving nutters?
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Why is childcare so readily assumed to be primarily a women's issue? I'm personally much more likely to need childcare than the young women at these conferences, many if not most of whom are child-free.Za-zen wrote:I find the omission of child care arrangements for WISC astounding, especially considering the amount of rhetoric about making conferences more welcoming for women that comes from the blowhards such as Hensley.
If the answer has anything to do with divorce and the judicial bias towards maternal custody, then surely that is just the sort of men's rights issue that SJW must relegate to invisible pixels, because patriarchy.
-
- .
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:56 am
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
People with autism are fucking retarded. Got a problem with that? Read this: http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... 710#p42710Setar wrote:dude, no. don't fucking use that word, full stop. there are real people here who have or can have that awful term applied to them and they will be the first to tell you that it is not. fucking. ok. do NOT slur autism or other developmental disabilities with the fucking r-word.
Stop whining, Shitar. Just stop.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Your point is well made, and i agree, i also consider that when i wrote that post. Nonetheless i was/am operating from their own playbook of "why conferences aren't open/welcoming to ze wymynz"d4m10n wrote:Why is childcare so readily assumed to be primarily a women's issue? I'm personally much more likely to need childcare than the young women at these conferences, many if not most of whom are child-free.Za-zen wrote:I find the omission of child care arrangements for WISC astounding, especially considering the amount of rhetoric about making conferences more welcoming for women that comes from the blowhards such as Hensley.
If the answer has anything to do with divorce and the judicial bias towards maternal custody, then surely that is just the sort of men's rights issue that SJW must relegate to invisible pixels, because patriarchy.
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Josh the Spokesgay is a dirty minded cunt isn't he?
From the Pharyngula comments section, comment 113:
Or fap.
It's hard to tell.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -each-one/
From the Pharyngula comments section, comment 113:
I like Justin and the work he does but if he defecates all over ANY woman at the Women is Secularism conference then I may go off him.Now we’ll get to watch it with Justin Vacula shitting all over women at Women in Secularism 2.
Or fap.
It's hard to tell.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -each-one/
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
No, I think it was more of a remark in relation with the fact that "childcare at conferences" was one of the early battlehorses at Skepchick's, and was indeed argued by here as being a women's issue.d4m10n wrote:Why is childcare so readily assumed to be primarily a women's issue? I'm personally much more likely to need childcare than the young women at these conferences, many if not most of whom are child-free.Za-zen wrote:I find the omission of child care arrangements for WISC astounding, especially considering the amount of rhetoric about making conferences more welcoming for women that comes from the blowhards such as Hensley.
If the answer has anything to do with divorce and the judicial bias towards maternal custody, then surely that is just the sort of men's rights issue that SJW must relegate to invisible pixels, because patriarchy.
Don't quote me on that though, I am known to sometimes have a faulty memory, but that's what I recall from the "Darwin's coup de grâce in Vegas" thread at Abbie's.
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
"Argued by her"* Damn typos!!!
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
From my interactions with internet radfems, they mostly seem to hate "breeders"....they use words like "child-free" instead of childless. (haha) Anyway, yeah, why is childcare a woman's thing?
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Atheism (less) Child Care
Absolutely mind boggling. Shows how much they really care about women eh?Michael K Gray wrote:[spoiler]This revelation that the Women in Skepticism conference is NOT going to have child-care facilities has blown my lid!
I mean, WTF?
Is it an oversight?
Was it planned this way?
Are the organisers selfish lamebrains?
Did they spend money on airfares and speaker's fees in lieu of even basic child-care?
I am truly staggered and stunned that self-professed feminists neglect this vital detail!
They have the audacity to slander Richard Dawkins, (neglecting the fact that he was the first to offer and fund child-care at secular meetings, before that poisonous parasite Beccy-boo-boos (spit) "came up" with the notion and claimed that he did it because of her, the lying cunt).
"We haven't got a grant yet" is the excuse of a clueless sociopath.
Again: WTF?[/spoiler]
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
It was/is as far as i'm aware a banner issue in enabling women to attend conference, and identified by the fftb/skepbabes as a reason for poor wymyn attendance. that banner waved by no less a flag waver than Miss beccybooze.
-
- .
- Posts: 1111
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:08 am
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Apologies to Paul Simon… and basically everyone else.
The Pit of Slime
Hello Slymepit, you old cunt
I've come to talk with you again
Because a PZ softly creeping
Left its seeds while I was sleeping
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains
Within the pit of slime
In restless dreams I walked alone
Narrow tubes of trolling stone
'Neath the halo of a street lamp
I turned my collar to the cold and damp
When my eyes were stabbed by the flash of a Skepchick blog
That split the fog
And touched the pit of slime
And in the naked light I saw
Ten thousand people maybe more
People talking without speaking
People hearing without listening
People writing songs that voices never shared
No one dared
Disturb the pit of slime
"Fools," said I, "you do not know
Slime like a cancer grows
Hear my words that I might teach you
Take my arms that I might reach you"
But my words like silent slimedrops fell
And echoed in the pits of slime
And the people bowed and prayed
To the blogger god they made
And the blog flashed out its warning
In the words that it was forming
And the blog said "The words of the prophets are written on the twitter walls
And the freethought blogs
And whispered in the pit of slime
The Pit of Slime
Hello Slymepit, you old cunt
I've come to talk with you again
Because a PZ softly creeping
Left its seeds while I was sleeping
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains
Within the pit of slime
In restless dreams I walked alone
Narrow tubes of trolling stone
'Neath the halo of a street lamp
I turned my collar to the cold and damp
When my eyes were stabbed by the flash of a Skepchick blog
That split the fog
And touched the pit of slime
And in the naked light I saw
Ten thousand people maybe more
People talking without speaking
People hearing without listening
People writing songs that voices never shared
No one dared
Disturb the pit of slime
"Fools," said I, "you do not know
Slime like a cancer grows
Hear my words that I might teach you
Take my arms that I might reach you"
But my words like silent slimedrops fell
And echoed in the pits of slime
And the people bowed and prayed
To the blogger god they made
And the blog flashed out its warning
In the words that it was forming
And the blog said "The words of the prophets are written on the twitter walls
And the freethought blogs
And whispered in the pit of slime
2B the queer shoop, or not.
rocko2466 wrote:This is my last for a week. Spent more time on this than the last one.
Took a little more poetic licence. Might not be as true to the source material.
Really nice work. As far as I'm concerned, you can quit your dayjob.
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Just wait until one of the skepchicks has kids and want to attend a conference without childcare facilities.
Then we'll hear all about it.
Then we'll hear all about it.
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Ah, that's easily explained in a manner which makes that pharyngulite appear truthful. You see, there can't possibly be any members of the SlimePit who are female. We are all just Franc's socks and are therefore, really male. That's why the SlimePit men can talk directly with us SlimePit women, and it still be true that SlimePitters are only men and "do everything they can to avoid talking directly to" women. Or not. :?Lsuoma wrote:Hey SN, Abbie, sacha, Renee, fascination, Vicky, etc., etc. (apologies for not listing everyone, and deliberately ignoring Tammy Strop Teenager): how do you like THEM "invisible pixels", eh?erikthebasshole wrote:Women turn in to “invisible pixels†when a slymepitter is around. They will attack them, slur them, but they do everything they can to avoid talking directly to them.
Invisible pixels! How come it's always the feminists who declare women to be all sorts of oppressed, vile, or degraded things?
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Further i should state that i fully support the idea of creche at conference, we can send all the sulky babes there when they throw tantrums.
The chief sexist Dr. Dawkins was the first to fund childcare at a major conference as far as i'm aware.
The chief sexist Dr. Dawkins was the first to fund childcare at a major conference as far as i'm aware.
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
This. This. This. Follow the money and compare salaries+unnecessary-overhead to actual charitable actions.Za-zen wrote:I find the omission of child care arrangements for WISC astounding, especially considering the amount of rhetoric about making conferences more welcoming for women that comes from the blowhards such as Hensley.
I'd love to take a look at the accounts! Watch where the money goes in any outfit and that will tell you about where their priorities lie. I got a hold of the accounts for a church once, and the cash sread was very revealing. Pastor salaries were phenomenal, whereas the investment in any real tangible "good work" was minimal.
So where has all the money gone? That they are now, and i stress, now, going to be grant beging to cover their asses.
Call me cynical, but I think most self-declared "charity" organizations are corrupt as fuck when looked at with the above comparison.
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
I always imagined you exactly like your avatar, typing away messages on FTB dressed as Batman.Pitchguest wrote:Old picture of me:ERV wrote:... Really?deanesmay wrote:OK, so, short summary is, anyone who is skeptical or critical of their position is an ORC, ala Lord of the Ring orcs--not, you know, human or anything.
No one has mentioned the new guys BEAUTIFUL ANGELIC HAIR OH MY GOD SO PRETTY YOU LOOK LIKE DAVID GILMOUR WHY DO SO MANY GUYS HERE HAVE LONG PRETTY HAIR?
http://s14.beta.photobucket.com/user/Pi ... sort=3&o=0
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
The radical lesbian feminist separatists back in the 1980s used 'breeder' as a derogatory word meaning a hetero woman. They probably still do. But the hetero radfems must not have liked that.debaser71 wrote:From my interactions with internet radfems, they mostly seem to hate "breeders"....they use words like "child-free" instead of childless. (haha) Anyway, yeah, why is childcare a woman's thing?
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
I'm actually David Cameron. Don't tell Labour.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
You are operating from an assumed premise that the sulkybabes would have kidz. I suggest this is flawed. Kids require such a high degree of sacrifice and maturity that i can't see the narcicists undertaking parenthood voluntarily. Much better to be a perpertual prepubescent and whine about how hard life is, living as you, with nobody understanding just what it is you have to go through everyday.Tony Parsehole wrote:Just wait until one of the skepchicks has kids and want to attend a conference without childcare facilities.
Then we'll hear all about it.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Blaghag after the Dawkins announcement:Za-zen wrote:It was/is as far as i'm aware a banner issue in enabling women to attend conference, and identified by the fftb/skepbabes as a reason for poor wymyn attendance. that banner waved by no less a flag waver than Miss beccybooze.
This was received to much applause, including my own. Having available child care at conferences has been one of the practical solutions I and other atheists have suggested repeatedly as a way to get more women to attend conferences. Yes, it certainly benefits both parents - but even amongst skeptics, mothers often end up (for whatever reason) in more traditional roles and are likely to be the ones stuck at home watching the kids.
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
I currently weigh 17 stone, not really fat and eat about 3000-4000 calories a day. If I have any less I find it really hard to stay awake and get motivated. I doubt I'd die if I had less though. I'd just yawn more often.Metalogic42 wrote:Kassiane is an extremely large hummingbird. You're being speciesist, check your privilege!Oneiros666 wrote:I am currently a 244 lbg man. My daily kcal intake should not exceed 2450kcal if I am to lose 0,5kg every week. In other words, to stay fat, but not gain fat, I need about 2800-2900 kcal every day. So when a girl nags about absolutely needing 2500-3000kcal every day, and if not she is in dire danger of dying; I laugh my arse off. She's just another lazy slacktivist moaning about how hard white middle-class American life is in order to feel good about not eating less and working out.BarnOwl wrote:Food lulz at A+ forums, hilarious!!!
Kassiane needs 2500 - 3000 calories per day? Really? And throwing up is "potentially fatally catastrophic?"
Sequencing difficulties, my arse. Cowgirl up and try acting like something other than a spoiled toddler.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Yes you are a cuntcunt wrote:I'm actually David Cameron. Don't tell Labour.
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
I always imagine you looking exactly as Cameron too.cunt wrote:I'm actually David Cameron. Don't tell Labour.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Shut it pleb.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
You find it really hard to stay awake because your body is working overtime digesting shit. Fuck me man, eat less move more enter into a regular sleep pattern, your energy levels will increaseTony Parsehole wrote:I currently weigh 17 stone, not really fat and eat about 3000-4000 calories a day. If I have any less I find it really hard to stay awake and get motivated. I doubt I'd die if I had less though. I'd just yawn more often.Metalogic42 wrote:Kassiane is an extremely large hummingbird. You're being speciesist, check your privilege!Oneiros666 wrote:I am currently a 244 lbg man. My daily kcal intake should not exceed 2450kcal if I am to lose 0,5kg every week. In other words, to stay fat, but not gain fat, I need about 2800-2900 kcal every day. So when a girl nags about absolutely needing 2500-3000kcal every day, and if not she is in dire danger of dying; I laugh my arse off. She's just another lazy slacktivist moaning about how hard white middle-class American life is in order to feel good about not eating less and working out.BarnOwl wrote:Food lulz at A+ forums, hilarious!!!
Kassiane needs 2500 - 3000 calories per day? Really? And throwing up is "potentially fatally catastrophic?"
Sequencing difficulties, my arse. Cowgirl up and try acting like something other than a spoiled toddler.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
I was leaving that bit off but yeah. As someone who was a single parent sans local family for too many years, it is really galling to ask about childcare and be talked to like either I am joking or eventually asked for the mother's info. Sorry folks, just me. I am the one doing this particular job. And no, I am not babysitting.d4m10n wrote:Why is childcare so readily assumed to be primarily a women's issue? I'm personally much more likely to need childcare than the young women at these conferences, many if not most of whom are child-free.Za-zen wrote:I find the omission of child care arrangements for WISC astounding, especially considering the amount of rhetoric about making conferences more welcoming for women that comes from the blowhards such as Hensley.
If the answer has anything to do with divorce and the judicial bias towards maternal custody, then surely that is just the sort of men's rights issue that SJW must relegate to invisible pixels, because patriarchy.
Re: Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs
Yes-- Its also on Christinas Official List of Diva Demands-- which I made fun of because she obviously had no clue what childcare costs/entails.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:No, I think it was more of a remark in relation with the fact that "childcare at conferences" was one of the early battlehorses at Skepchick's, and was indeed argued by here as being a women's issue.d4m10n wrote:Why is childcare so readily assumed to be primarily a women's issue? I'm personally much more likely to need childcare than the young women at these conferences, many if not most of whom are child-free.Za-zen wrote:I find the omission of child care arrangements for WISC astounding, especially considering the amount of rhetoric about making conferences more welcoming for women that comes from the blowhards such as Hensley.
If the answer has anything to do with divorce and the judicial bias towards maternal custody, then surely that is just the sort of men's rights issue that SJW must relegate to invisible pixels, because patriarchy.
Don't quote me on that though, I am known to sometimes have a faulty memory, but that's what I recall from the "Darwin's coup de grâce in Vegas" thread at Abbie's.
Though I do love that the Women in Secularism conference is exorbitantly expensive, being held in one of the most expensive parts of the country (>$200 a night for hotel), doesnt provide childcare (a feature the supporters demand of other conferences), all to see speakers who have their talks readily available online, right now, for free.
Its not feminism. Its stupidity.