Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:15 am
About time.
Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/
:-) As I've periodically argued, fascism gets a far worse press than it deserves ... ;-)
Ridley wrote:The practical results of this vluntary policy - which was criticicized in 1993 by the New York Times as eugenic - are already impressive. Cystic fibrosis has been virtually eliminated from the Jewish population in the United States. [pg 191]
Aragorn was a Númenorean, through the Dúnedain. I don't think it was breeding so much as lineage(not quite the same thing.) Especially seeing as he bangs an elf, and begets a half-and-half. Tarzan was more about the virtues of living wild and the destructive influence of civilization. Burroughs was actually quite progressive for his time, and African natives are actually treated as people in his work. More of a Noble Savage thing. There's clearly some breeding nods, but I believe that misses the main thrust of his thinking.John D wrote: ↑ On a completely different subject... haha. I have been re-reading Frank Herbert's Dune. I had forgotten how much of it was about selective breeding. The Bene Gesserit are manipulating people's reproduction and using their control to create people who are genetically superior... including mystical and even supernatural powers. It is basically a story of genetic purity creating a super-human (Paul the Kwisatz Haderach).
Of course... and having read Lord of the Rings four times... it is basically the same theme. Aragorn, the king returned, is of noble birth and thus he is genetically superior to others. He is not simply king by birthright, he is king because he is a truly superior human.
And also.... my mind wanders to Tarzan. If you have never read the original, I highly recommend it. Tarzan is the son of British royalty, and thus he is a superior human. The royalty in England has become lazy, but the test of the jungle brings out the superiority of British Royalty. This part of the story is not subtle or understated. It is explained over and over. Tarzan is about to be "King of the Jungle" because he is a superior human due to his royal birth.
and... let's not forget that Jesus was a direct descendent of King David. The Buddha, Odysseys... etc.... all a result of superior breeding to some extent.
So, really, these extremely popular fantasy fictions (including the Bible) are based on a kind of social Darwinism. The superior breed of human will triumph and thus be the rightful and generous leader of his feeble minions.
I am like... oh shit... I never really thought of this before.
Really? Haven't seen anything yet on that. But I have broached that suggestion, and have had some sympathy for it ... ;-)Guest_9f0c1607 wrote: ↑ Just poked me' head in to say, steerzo. Now's yer chance. She say's she's willing to change so this is the time to agitiate for your koran pissing policy.
<snip>
When was the last time you read the original Tarzan? Just saying that I was pretty surprised by the way Tarzan's "lineage" was the explanation for why he was superior to the native people.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ Tarzan was more about the virtues of living wild and the destructive influence of civilization. Burroughs was actually quite progressive for his time, and African natives are actually treated as people in his work. More of a Noble Savage thing. There's clearly some breeding nods, but I believe that misses the main thrust of his thinking.
Tangled web indeed, and one apparently coming apart at the seams; couldn't happen to a nicer bunch. And that sure was a jaw-dropping series of statements from Wernick - "desperation is palpable" methinks:screwtape wrote: ↑Yes, quite a tangled web is unweaving. Why did Butts resign if he had done nothing wrong? Why was the deferred prosecution/remediation legislation snuck into an omnibus finance bill? Was it included simply to give SNC-Lavalin an out? Was the wording in it about not being allowed to consider economic consequences put there to provide plausible deniability when it was suggested it be used to resolve the SNC-Lavalin case? Will someone be shot in Canada if the press keeps asking questions?
Wernick may consider it 'robust advocacy' and not 'inappropriate pressure' to keep telling the Attorney General that the economic consequences of prosecution would be disastrous (and remember, these are not to be considered in choosing remediation instead of prosecution), but the decision remained hers alone. You still want to prosecute? Let me advocate again: economic disaster, no pressure, your decision. Still want to procescute? Oh, dear, let's advocate again etc etc ad nauseam (which is the only "vomitorium" (link above) I find in all this. It's badgering someone until they give the answer you desire, but technically remaining just within the wording of the Shawcross doctrine, whilst gang-raping its spirit.
<snip>
Just gave it a glance over, and indeed there is more than I recalled about breeding leading to behavior. My apologies. I had recently (ten years ago, christ I'm getting old) read Burroughs' Barsoom novels to my kids. I recalled that the dominant Red Martians were am admixture of the other, older races and that Burroughs contemplated something similar happening on Earth. In the later Tarzan novels, I distinctly recall Tarzan being friends with black Africans, and of finding a mixed-race vestige of Rome...or perhaps it's all becoming a pulp blur. I still think that there was a bit of noble savage and distrust of civilization being a strong theme. Of one thing I'm sure, is that all the old pulp writers have joined Lovecraft on the bonfire of modern sensibilities.John D wrote: ↑When was the last time you read the original Tarzan? Just saying that I was pretty surprised by the way Tarzan's "lineage" was the explanation for why he was superior to the native people.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ Tarzan was more about the virtues of living wild and the destructive influence of civilization. Burroughs was actually quite progressive for his time, and African natives are actually treated as people in his work. More of a Noble Savage thing. There's clearly some breeding nods, but I believe that misses the main thrust of his thinking.
I suppose the idea that lineage is different from genetics is valid.... hmmmm.... but the lineage thing is really just a justification for why royalty should rule the rest of us schmuks. They are considered to be superior humans... either through genetic inheritance or "godly" inheritance.
I think Arwen was only three quarter Elvish given her Pa was Elrond Half Elf ...CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Aragorn was a Númenorean, through the Dúnedain. I don't think it was breeding so much as lineage(not quite the same thing.) Especially seeing as he bangs an elf, and begets a half-and-half ..... snipJohn D wrote: ↑ On a completely different subject... haha. I have been re-reading Frank Herbert's Dune. I had forgotten how much of it was about selective breeding. The Bene Gesserit are manipulating people's reproduction and using their control to create people who are genetically superior... including mystical and even supernatural powers. It is basically a story of genetic purity creating a super-human (Paul the Kwisatz Haderach).
Of course... and having read Lord of the Rings four times... it is basically the same theme. Aragorn, the king returned, is of noble birth and thus he is genetically superior to others. He is not simply king by birthright, he is king because he is a truly superior human.
And also.... my mind wanders to Tarzan. If you have never read the original, I highly recommend it. Tarzan is the son of British royalty, and thus he is a superior human. The royalty in England has become lazy, but the test of the jungle brings out the superiority of British Royalty. This part of the story is not subtle or understated. It is explained over and over. Tarzan is about to be "King of the Jungle" because he is a superior human due to his royal birth.
and... let's not forget that Jesus was a direct descendent of King David. The Buddha, Odysseys... etc.... all a result of superior breeding to some extent.
So, really, these extremely popular fantasy fictions (including the Bible) are based on a kind of social Darwinism. The superior breed of human will triumph and thus be the rightful and generous leader of his feeble minions.
I am like... oh shit... I never really thought of this before.
Yes. I agree with you. The explanation for why the British nobility in the UK were "weak" is because they were not properly tested by their environment. Tarzan was a sort of "superman" because of his noble lineage and the test of overcoming the wild.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ I still think that there was a bit of noble savage and distrust of civilization being a strong theme. Of one thing I'm sure, is that all the old pulp writers have joined Lovecraft on the bonfire of modern sensibilities.
John D wrote: ↑Yes. I agree with you. The explanation for why the British nobility in the UK were "weak" is because they were not properly tested by their environment. Tarzan was a sort of "superman" because of his noble lineage and the test of overcoming the wild.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ I still think that there was a bit of noble savage and distrust of civilization being a strong theme. Of one thing I'm sure, is that all the old pulp writers have joined Lovecraft on the bonfire of modern sensibilities.
No she's not hot as fuck - she's emaciated with botox lips and a characterless face.
Mind you, the John Buchan novels suggested the right sort of British chaps were constantly testing themselves - against salmon, stags, Huns, mountains, Jews and, of course, each other. But only as gifted amateurs, as being too good or trying too hard wasn't quite done. Should read them all again one of these days! And if you've never read Geoffrey Household's 1939 Rogue Male, you have missed out on a very good thriller (if one with some interesting twists - poor Asmodeus!)John D wrote: ↑Yes. I agree with you. The explanation for why the British nobility in the UK were "weak" is because they were not properly tested by their environment. Tarzan was a sort of "superman" because of his noble lineage and the test of overcoming the wild.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ I still think that there was a bit of noble savage and distrust of civilization being a strong theme. Of one thing I'm sure, is that all the old pulp writers have joined Lovecraft on the bonfire of modern sensibilities.
Service Dog wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 9:27 am*After* Jussie Smollett's arrest, a complete maniac on CNN sez *all* MAGA rally attendees are the same as noose & bleach lynchers...
I wanna find video of the MSNBC interviewee from yesterday, Zack Stafford, whose theory is that the whole thing is a frame-up by racist Chicago police. The interview is the editor-in-chief of The Advocate, gay newspaper.
Zack Stafford's previous job was "CONTENT DIRECTOR" for... GRINDR!
I listened to an audio play of 'The 39 Steps' recently - at one point the main character (Richard Hannay) has to give an off the cuff speech to members of the Liberal party on the topic of Australia. The gist of it being "There are no Torys in Australia".screwtape wrote: ↑ Mind you, the John Buchan novels suggested the right sort of British chaps were constantly testing themselves - against salmon, stags, Huns, mountains, Jews and, of course, each other. But only as gifted amateurs, as being too good or trying too hard wasn't quite done. Should read them all again one of these days! And if you've never read Geoffrey Household's 1939 Rogue Male, you have missed out on a very good thriller (if one with some interesting twists - poor Asmodeus!)
Perhaps what's funny is the idea of a movement of dedicated fans who think that Trump is a fighter, metaphorically or otherwise, when he's so much of a bumbling asshole that even Tucker Carlson and Ann Coulter, two of the thought-leaders of the populist/nationalist side of the GOP, are having regrets.
I once read an article by a bemused journalist that had Trump showing her the lumps on his feet that were the infamous "bone spurs" that cost him a successful - yoooge - military career, and lost the Vietnam War for America as a consequence. The only bone spurs that occur in draft-age feet are the calcifications ("heel spurs") in the attachment of the plantar fascia on the calcaneum seen in X-rays of people with plantar fasciitis. They are not really spurs or spikes, and they don't dig in like ingrown toenails. They represent healed inflammation in a ligament. They cannot be seen externally. It seems they can be purchased by providing rent-free accommodation in NYC, however.
Poor Little Paul is just trying to stay relevant, hip and maintain his ever-diminshing horde. If he really wanted to impress us, he'd dig up Caine and use her bones for artwork.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑ Meyers is such a hard-bodied brute, he is on the verge of turning me.
*swoon*
https://i.imgur.com/pD5aQLE.png
Seriously, what is the sad old fucker thinking when he posts this shit? That Becky is going to read it and come sprinting over to Hootville, Minnesota to suck on his wizened little bellend?
https://i.imgur.com/WaGa7ZR.png
Artwork: Gumby
I really think that Meyers does not, can not, will not, see how ridiculous this is. How it is the attitude of a million seventeen-year-olds with middle-class parents and flabbily comfortable Western lives. And how hypocritical it is when he has fucking Amazon affiliate links all over his blog.
Foolish, bitter little man.
https://i.imgur.com/WBLKn1q.png
Artwork: Ape+lust
One word: Bunions.screwtape wrote: ↑I once read an article by a bemused journalist that had Trump showing her the lumps on his feet that were the infamous "bone spurs" that cost him a successful - yoooge - military career, and lost the Vietnam War for America as a consequence. The only bone spurs that occur in draft-age feet are the calcifications ("heel spurs") in the attachment of the plantar fascia on the calcaneum seen in X-rays of people with plantar fasciitis. They are not really spurs or spikes, and they don't dig in like ingrown toenails. They represent healed inflammation in a ligament. They cannot be seen externally. It seems they can be purchased by providing rent-free accommodation in NYC, however.
:shock: :lol: :clap:ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑ Meyers is such a hard-bodied brute, he is on the verge of turning me.
<snip>
https://i.imgur.com/WBLKn1q.png
Artwork: Ape+lust
:lol:CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Poor Little Paul is just trying to stay relevant, hip and maintain his ever-diminshing horde. If he really wanted to impress us, he'd dig up Caine and use her bones for artwork.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑ Meyers is such a hard-bodied brute, he is on the verge of turning me.
<snip>
What, too soon?
:lol: "Oh ye, of little faith!" A never-Trumper, born & bred ... ;-)screwtape wrote: ↑I once read an article by a bemused journalist that had Trump showing her the lumps on his feet that were the infamous "bone spurs" that cost him a successful - yoooge - military career, and lost the Vietnam War for America as a consequence. .... They cannot be seen externally. It seems they can be purchased by providing rent-free accommodation in NYC, however.
shoutinghorse wrote: ↑ It appears that Maduro has ordered attacks on humanitarian aid trucks attempting to enter Venezuela. Obviously he's another one not doing socialism right. :naughty:
Soldiers abandon posts.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-47343918
Maduro's supporters are all insisting the humanitarian aid (which they always put in scare quotes) is actually US guns, ammo, etc. They supply no evidence, naturally, but they know this anti-US rhetoric plays well with idiots and far left extremists.shoutinghorse wrote: ↑ It appears that Maduro has ordered attacks on humanitarian aid trucks attempting to enter Venezuela. Obviously he's another one not doing socialism right. :naughty:
To be fair, any left-leaning Government of a South/Central American country would be wise to be suspicious of supplies arriving from a right-leaning US Government: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ContrasCommanderTuvok wrote: ↑shoutinghorse wrote: ↑ It appears that Maduro has ordered attacks on humanitarian aid trucks attempting to enter Venezuela. Obviously he's another one not doing socialism right. :naughty:
witter.com/WCKitchen/stat9383797731201024
Soldiers abandon posts.
bc.netin-america-47343918Maduro's supporters are all insisting the humanitarian aid (which they always put in scare quotes) is actually US guns, ammo, etc. They supply no evidence, naturally, but they know this anti-US rhetoric plays well with idiots and far left extremists.shoutinghorse wrote: ↑ It appears that Maduro has ordered attacks on humanitarian aid trucks attempting to enter Venezuela. Obviously he's another one not doing socialism right. :naughty:
Sometime around the end of high school, I found a paperback copy of Emile Zola's 1885 novel 'Germinal', which was dreary, dry reading-- even worse, it's 13th in a 20 volume series. I didnt' make it to the end. But, apparently, Zola's goal was to portray heritable traits-- so the angry drunk in the first part of the books would have an angry drunk son later & angry drunk grandson, or whatever. Tedious.
A bunion from a hallux valgus tends not to develop until later in life when the big toe deviates laterally.MarcusAu wrote: ↑One word: Bunions.screwtape wrote: ↑I once read an article by a bemused journalist that had Trump showing her the lumps on his feet that were the infamous "bone spurs" that cost him a successful - yoooge - military career, and lost the Vietnam War for America as a consequence. The only bone spurs that occur in draft-age feet are the calcifications ("heel spurs") in the attachment of the plantar fascia on the calcaneum seen in X-rays of people with plantar fasciitis. They are not really spurs or spikes, and they don't dig in like ingrown toenails. They represent healed inflammation in a ligament. They cannot be seen externally. It seems they can be purchased by providing rent-free accommodation in NYC, however.
That's my long range diagnosis.
So this guy goes to a podiatrist for a bunion. Doc takes a look and says "You've got to stop masturbating!" The guy says; "What, why doc?" Says she; "Because I'm trying to do the exam!"screwtape wrote: ↑A bunion from a hallux valgus tends not to develop until later in life when the big toe deviates laterally.MarcusAu wrote: ↑One word: Bunions.screwtape wrote: ↑I once read an article by a bemused journalist that had Trump showing her the lumps on his feet that were the infamous "bone spurs" that cost him a successful - yoooge - military career, and lost the Vietnam War for America as a consequence. The only bone spurs that occur in draft-age feet are the calcifications ("heel spurs") in the attachment of the plantar fascia on the calcaneum seen in X-rays of people with plantar fasciitis. They are not really spurs or spikes, and they don't dig in like ingrown toenails. They represent healed inflammation in a ligament. They cannot be seen externally. It seems they can be purchased by providing rent-free accommodation in NYC, however.
That's my long range diagnosis.
Fucking monument sellers are like flies on a turd. Made one web inquiry and the cunt rang me with hard sell inside a minute. Cunts.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: ↑Sat Feb 16, 2019 6:19 amFranc:
Kind of sorry to hear that, and kind of not. After the shit you went through, it must be a relief. The financial burden is a real bitch. Hope you can sort things out.