
ERV wrote:Dr. Caleb Lack is also blogging at SIN:
http://skepticink.com/backgroundprobability/
SIN: GET ALL THE PEOPLE FROM OKLAHOMA TO BLAG!






rayshul wrote:Australian? I had thought that most Australians were naturally impervious to radfem crazy...

aweraw wrote:Jesus... forgive my sloppy diction/spelling... friday afternoon beers (and accompanying slacking off) at my work place.

rayshul wrote:Australian? I had thought that most Australians were naturally impervious to radfem crazy...


aweraw wrote: snip
..and I began to wonder if this was the very treatment other people where objecting to, and I found myself here...
aweraw wrote:
only to discover it is not the hive of scum and villany I had been lead to believe it was.
aweraw wrote:
... I don't agree with you all unreservedly ...

TheMan wrote:aweraw wrote:Jesus... forgive my sloppy diction/spelling... friday afternoon beers (and accompanying slacking off) at my work place.
Bored at work too...Sydney... though a nice southerly is coming in.

DownThunder wrote:rayshul wrote:Australian? I had thought that most Australians were naturally impervious to radfem crazy...
Only the sick cunts and mad cunts are impervious. Unfortunately, there are still academics with strong feminist leanings which do their fair sure of telling male DV survivors and abused boys to shut it. Even some of the radfem hub members were australian....

Michael K Gray wrote:DownThunder wrote:rayshul wrote:Australian? I had thought that most Australians were naturally impervious to radfem crazy...
Only the sick cunts and mad cunts are impervious. Unfortunately, there are still academics with strong feminist leanings which do their fair sure of telling male DV survivors and abused boys to shut it. Even some of the radfem hub members were australian....
Germaine Greer, anyone?

DownThunder wrote:I think its time for a slymepit splinter group. Mad cunt+

Saint N. wrote:The part he is missing (either because he refuses to or can't figure it out) is that there is no reason to believe that the mod fixed the problem for any other reason than that he was talking to Matt Dillahunty. If he was just some anonymous, first time commenter voicing a legit concern, the conversation could have gone very differently.

aweraw wrote:I think you guys are on the right track... I don't agree with you all unreservedly, but I'll be damned if this isn't a much healthier group dynamic than what exists at FTB/A+.
aweraw wrote:Sock puppeting is when you create accounts to reply to and support your own arguments. He didn't do that, so it's not sock puppetry, IMO

Michael K Gray wrote:Germaine Greer, anyone?

— Bertrand Russell.The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure, and the intelligent are full of doubt.

rayshul wrote:Boy I sure fucking love the language police arguments. Yep, they're so fucking useful. Glad we're rehashing all that lovely wank.

Tony Parsehole wrote:
Twat is a weird one . A lot of people where I live , my parents included, think it means a pregnant fish. 100% true


Michael K Gray wrote:— Bertrand Russell.The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure, and the intelligent are full of doubt.
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity. Yeats

Trophy wrote:Exactly. This is the mormom moment, when that guy Harris lost the original translation of the plates and Joseph Smith had to make up another translation that somehow mormons believe proves Joseph Smith was right. Just like that, anyone who continues to believe the A+ propaganda is a True Believer. They would like to believe that the situation with Matt proves that A+ admins are fair and that if there are any problems, the admins would fix it. They would like to believe that they are good people who do not turn away 'allies' and they would like to believe that the admins are reasonable people who listen to arguments. And we all know it is bullshit and it proves the exact opposite. We all know they tried to fix the problem because someone important (and one of their own) got caught in their web of bullshit. They do not care for ordinary people.

Tigzy wrote:Though on reflection, a 'git' isn't any body part I'm aware of.
There's 'bellend', 'knob' and 'knobber', but I think they're kind of obscure outside the UK.


Tigzy wrote:Shit! 'Bollocks!' How could any British person forget the 'bollocks'??
Bollocks - testicles. Synonymous with bravery ("You've got bollocks", "Show some fuckin bollocks") but also for when someone is talking a load of old toot ("PZ/The Prune/Black Zvan etc. etc. is talking bollocks again."), and used as an exclamation for when you wish to refrain from doing something you dislike ("Fly economy class?? Bollocks to that!" - as said in an alternative universe where Rebecca Watson is British). Can also be deployed as a dismissive insult ("Bollocks to yer!") or as a general exclamation to aid catharsis ("Aw BOLLOCKS!")


sacha wrote:the dog's.

sacha wrote:Tony Parsehole wrote:
Twat is a weird one . A lot of people where I live , my parents included, think it means a pregnant fish. 100% true
hahaha! I LOVE when someone tries to explain that to me. Some of the most intelligent and articulate people have told me that as if they were an expert on the word. It is such a tempting invitation to have a go.

aweraw wrote:One more point on the Dillhunty thing - they're accusing him of sock puppetry. They don't know what it mean obviously.
Sock puppeting is when you create accounts to reply to and support your own arguments. He didn't do that, so it's not sock puppetry, IMO

Butters wrote:http://skepticink.com/justinvacula/2012/10/04/i-resign-my-leadership-position-with-secular-coalition-for-america/
I resign my leadership position with Secular Coalition for America
Well, the A+ers have a winning strategy. I expect them to continue along this course for ANY detractors they have in the future.


Tony Parsehole wrote:sacha wrote:Tony Parsehole wrote:
Twat is a weird one . A lot of people where I live , my parents included, think it means a pregnant fish. 100% true
hahaha! I LOVE when someone tries to explain that to me. Some of the most intelligent and articulate people have told me that as if they were an expert on the word. It is such a tempting invitation to have a go.
So you've heard that too? Thought it was just the weirdo's where I live.

Steersman wrote:rayshul wrote:Boy I sure fucking love the language police arguments. Yep, they're so fucking useful. Glad we're rehashing all that lovely wank.
It is maybe unfortunate to have to go through it again, particularly as there seems to have been fairly extensive discussions in the archive. But since, as far as I know, those discussions aren’t all that organized – say in Pharwrongula – it is maybe a little much to expect oolon to have to put the pieces of the puzzle together from that fragmented discussion.
Steersman wrote:rayshul wrote:But I’ll agree that it is unfortunate about Justin's resignation. Would really have been nice if the SCA had actually demanded some proof, some evidence, for the claims made in Zvan’s petition which I think were decidedly specious if not actually defamatory ....

Steersman wrote:But I’ll agree that it is unfortunate about Justin's resignation. Would really have been nice if the SCA had actually demanded some proof, some evidence, for the claims made in Zvan’s petition which I think were decidedly specious if not actually defamatory ...

Michael K Gray wrote:Tony Parsehole wrote:sacha wrote:Tony Parsehole wrote:
Twat is a weird one . A lot of people where I live , my parents included, think it means a pregnant fish. 100% true
hahaha! I LOVE when someone tries to explain that to me. Some of the most intelligent and articulate people have told me that as if they were an expert on the word. It is such a tempting invitation to have a go.
So you've heard that too? Thought it was just the weirdo's where I live.
Are you not confusing twat with Twit?

Saint N. wrote:
Good comparison. I brought up a similar point to a pair of missionaries who came to my door one time, let's just say they weren't amused![]()
When it comes to Matt's venture into A+, he is still not getting what the major problems for us are, and I really don't see him getting it anytime soon (like you said, he seems to be a True Believer). The main concern wasn't that a commenter didn't have a way to appeal the mod's decision to delete their comment, its that the comments are getting deleted in the first place without a fair discussion taking place about their content [b]prior to the deletion. [/b]So what problem did they fix? That Matt's comments won't be deleted again at a whim. What about the rest of us who don't have the name recognition to muster a loud enough pushback against them? Worst yet, how does Matt even know the problem has actually been fixed, he just takes the A+ mod's word for it and acts like its some great victory we should all appreciate. The most annoying part is that he keeps saying in his video how we're all exaggerating the problem with the A+ forum, even though the exact thing we said would happen to him did in fact happen. So where's the exaggeration? And if 'Curious' stayed anonymous, none of them would have given a shit about the so-called 'problem' (no one jumped in to fix it until after they knew 'Curious' was Matt). They appeased him for the sake of avoiding bad PR. The majority of people who comment with legit criticisms, and get their comments deleted, just don't bother showing up again because they know its not worth the effort (that is, after all, how the slime pit got started in the first place). Which means we probably won't even know if Matt's problem was actually 'fixed'. Unless the dissenters start coming over here to vent but I imagine most would just move on and say 'fuck it' to the whole thing.
Which means we probably won't even know if Matt's problem was actually 'fixed'. Unless the dissenters start coming over here to vent but I imagine most would just move on and say 'fuck it' to the whole thing.





Tony Parsehole wrote:If Pharyngula is Mordor then what's The Pit? Gondor just doesn't seem right.


Jonathan wrote:Tony Parsehole wrote:If Pharyngula is Mordor then what's The Pit? Gondor just doesn't seem right.
Rohan, perhaps.

Tony Parsehole wrote:Michael K Gray wrote:Tony Parsehole wrote:sacha wrote:Tony Parsehole wrote:
Twat is a weird one . A lot of people where I live , my parents included, think it means a pregnant fish. 100% true
hahaha! I LOVE when someone tries to explain that to me. Some of the most intelligent and articulate people have told me that as if they were an expert on the word. It is such a tempting invitation to have a go.
So you've heard that too? Thought it was just the weirdo's where I live.
Are you not confusing twat with Twit?
Nope. There are a number of people where I live, parents (but not me) included, who think a pregnant fish is called a twat.
BTW are pregnant fish called twits?


Tristan wrote:Wow, there really are a lot of Aussies on this forum, huh? Wonder why that is?


Philip of Tealand wrote:Oolon, why is it so difficult for you to see just how dreadful and petty the likes of Myers and Watson can be, but you find it so terribly easy to find fault in anything that Justin does or anything we say (like cunt) or do on this site?

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Jonathan wrote:Tony Parsehole wrote:If Pharyngula is Mordor then what's The Pit? Gondor just doesn't seem right.
Rohan, perhaps.
The Shire, 'cause we're all nice and small and cudly. Fuck! We're the Ewoks of the A/S community!


Dick Strawkins wrote:Philip of Tealand wrote:Oolon, why is it so difficult for you to see just how dreadful and petty the likes of Myers and Watson can be, but you find it so terribly easy to find fault in anything that Justin does or anything we say (like cunt) or do on this site?
Oolon has admitted on various FTB sites that what he does here is simply trolling. He is not engaging with us. He is trying to wind us up, taking the piss and attempting to stir up fights.
I wouldn't mind if he was simply pointing out hypocrisy or double standards on our part. That's what we do with the FTB crowd and so we should be prepared to take it as well as give it.
Oolon, however, doesn't do that. On the FTB boards he lies through his teeth about what we do and say here and when he comes here, posing 'innocent' questions, he either ignores out of hand any reasonable responses, or deliberately posts nasty shit, like his homophobic reference to Josh, just to muddy the waters and make it seem like such behavior is the norm here - when the sole person partaking in this action is himself.
He is a nasty, homophobic liar.
But, of course, his lies help the FTB cause so they won't ban him.
The description of him as FTBs Sal Cordova are spot on.

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Then maybe we can send a mail with all these exemples to Matt. Probably won't change his mind, but it'd be full of lulz.
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:One thing I really like when I come to the Pit in the morning is seeing most of the latest posts come from Down Under.

Jonathan wrote:Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Jonathan wrote:Tony Parsehole wrote:If Pharyngula is Mordor then what's The Pit? Gondor just doesn't seem right.
Rohan, perhaps.
The Shire, 'cause we're all nice and small and cudly. Fuck! We're the Ewoks of the A/S community!
Speak for yourself. I am not at all cuddly. And regular application of a razor keeps my feet hair-free.
To extend my Rohan analogy, he is the Slyme Pit's very own Grima Wormtongue.

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Jonathan wrote:Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Jonathan wrote:Tony Parsehole wrote:If Pharyngula is Mordor then what's The Pit? Gondor just doesn't seem right.
Rohan, perhaps.
The Shire, 'cause we're all nice and small and cudly. Fuck! We're the Ewoks of the A/S community!
Speak for yourself. I am not at all cuddly. And regular application of a razor keeps my feet hair-free.
I did say Ewoks, not Hobbits. Leaves about 95% of your body full of hair.To extend my Rohan analogy, he is the Slyme Pit's very own Grima Wormtongue.
Then who's Saruman? The plot thickens...




Jonathan wrote:
To extend my Rohan analogy, he is the Slyme Pit's very own Grima Wormtongue.
Then who's Saruman? The plot thickens...
I must admit that has been troubling me. I suspect Phillip of Tealand, that guy is just TOO nice. It's like he's trying to hide something.....

masakari2012 wrote:I'm an American. I've been to Perth/Fremantle, Australia. I had a lot of fun there. The people were really friendly.

Skep tickle wrote:Hi, all. Only recently started reading here, when I was looking for evidence one way or another about theclaimswitch hunt against JV. I like the feel of the place!
Thanks for the link to the Dillahunty video - it was an unexpected treat for me, as I learned partway through that it was my banning at Atheism+ that he says set off his recent adventure there. (~17 posts, questioning claims and presenting counter evidence esp about the JV witch hunt, ending with my refusing to drink their Koolaid and telling them so). Until watching Dillahunty's video just now, I had no idea that there were more posts about me after I left, than I left in my very short career there. Looks like a grand total of 2 people have suggested my ban be reconsidered (not that that would last long, were I to open my mouth again there), and also that for a while the mods thought Dillahunty's sock was actually me returning as a sock (paranoia will do that to you, I guess).
The extra funny aspect is that despite all their supposedly advanced social awareness and gender sensibilities, they're making the unwarranted assumption that Skep tickle is male.![]()


Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Jonathan wrote:
To extend my Rohan analogy, he is the Slyme Pit's very own Grima Wormtongue.Then who's Saruman? The plot thickens...I must admit that has been troubling me. I suspect Phillip of Tealand, that guy is just TOO nice. It's like he's trying to hide something.....
Nah, not Phillip. Let's think: beard, lives in a high "ivory" tower, has lots of minions and Huruk hai ready to jump in the fray at his order...
Nope, no idea.

Skep tickle wrote:The extra funny aspect is that despite all their supposedly advanced social awareness and gender sensibilities, they're making the unwarranted assumption that Skep tickle is male.![]()


Jonathan wrote:Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Jonathan wrote:
To extend my Rohan analogy, he is the Slyme Pit's very own Grima Wormtongue.Then who's Saruman? The plot thickens...I must admit that has been troubling me. I suspect Phillip of Tealand, that guy is just TOO nice. It's like he's trying to hide something.....
Nah, not Phillip. Let's think: beard, lives in a high "ivory" tower, has lots of minions and Huruk hai ready to jump in the fray at his order...
Nope, no idea.
*sighs* I guess it will forever be a mystery then.


Tkmlac wrote:SPACKlick wrote:Just managed to get banned over at A+ for suggesting to a mod that him determining I should feel my rape was worse than if I had been murdered was offensive.
Hypocrites left right and centre.
What the actual fuck is wrong with these people?

Jonathan wrote: I must admit that has been troubling me. I suspect Phillip of Tealand, that guy is just TOO nice. It's like he's trying to hide something.....


Excellent - I'd love one!masakari2012 wrote:Welcome Skep tickle. In case you're unable to see what was posted after being banned, here's a backup copy from the day I saw that dispute. This is the only page that's actually relevant to you, since after doing a ctrl+f for your name on the other pages, no results came up....
http://pastehtml.com/view/cdn3rqkd4.html
Since we don't serve any Kool-Aid here.... would you like a beer?

A compelling point.Heintje wrote:Skep tickle wrote:The extra funny aspect is that despite all their supposedly advanced social awareness and gender sensibilities, they're making the unwarranted assumption that Skep tickle is male.![]()
[victim-blaming] It is your fault for using a pseudonym that is suggestive of a certain dangling male organ.[/victim-blaming]
I presume you got that impression from the pronouns ("he", "his", etc.) they use to refer to you? Even if I were a girl IRL, I'd gladly accept them over such neologistic bullshits as "xe", "xir", "ze" etc. Fuck, I'd rather pick "it", "its", or even "that horse-fucker" over those nonsense.
Can I take that as a promise?Heintje wrote:Anyway, welcome to the Slyme Pit. Just be aware that posting here comes with the "privilege" of getting perma-banned in FfTB.

Here i am, Gawd save the queenie, don'tcha Know pip pip & all that. Would i be TOTALLY out of order suggesting the occasionalPhilip of Tealand wrote: where are all the Limey cunts?.
DDOS on Mordor? I know it's "Upping the ante" a bit but just occasionally & for short periods we could be a REAL pain to them? 

Philip of Tealand wrote:Jonathan wrote: I must admit that has been troubling me. I suspect Phillip of Tealand, that guy is just TOO nice. It's like he's trying to hide something.....
I have it on good authority that Jonathan is an exceptionally good writer, I have no doubt he can weave a tale of such convincing authority that people would believe I'm up to something when in fact I'm just off to The Kettle - whilst I'm up, what does everyone else want?

Skep tickle wrote:
*snip*
They have just banned Dillahunty (for using a sock puppet). Conditions of reinstatement include a sincere apology (from him to them, not the other way around).

bismarket wrote:Here i am, Gawd save the queenie, don'tcha Know pip pip & all that. Would i be TOTALLY out of order suggesting the occasionalPhilip of Tealand wrote: where are all the Limey cunts?.DDOS on Mordor? I know it's "Upping the ante" a bit but just occasionally & for short periods we could be a REAL pain to them?

Return to Periodic Table of Swearing - The Undead Thread
Users browsing this forum: bovarchist, Clarence, ConcentratedH2O, OM, deLurch, HumphreyKing, Karmakin, katamari Damassi, Skep tickle, Voryn and 19 guests