Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:01 pm
Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/
Oh dear, much too romantic/mushy/dependent and just plain talking too much for this old woman. Heheh, next...franc wrote:GranitaGranita. Flower of my adolescence, torment of my nights. Will I ever see you again? Granita. Granita. Gran-i-ta. Three syllables, the second and third forming a diminutive, as if contradicting the first. Granita, may I remember you until your image has become a shadow and your abode the grave.
Sob! Sometimes I think that no one takes this horrible thought crime seriously.sacha wrote:hahaha!Scented Nectar wrote:stop sexualificobjectializationing me
Becky calls Dawkins "Richardâ€. Does he use her first name?Dick Strawkins wrote:It's interesting to test assertions against the available evidence.
From RW's Slate article:
[youtube]cOVN-rjQ3sg[/youtube]
I think Zvan's plunged to new depths (sewer level depths, you might say) of stupidity with that article. Despite bearing in mind that she's previously tried to equate change with damage, and refers to a certain threat of violence as an 'ambiguous colloquialism', I still remain surprised at the utter idiocy of this article.ReneeHendricks wrote:Holy shit snacks, Scoobie! My comment went through: http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... ent-135639
And here I thought she had me banned :D I stand corrected!
Outwest wrote:
*snip*
But there are other irrational things you might believe in, like sexism
Hatred - disproportionate and obsessive or otherwise - of Islam can be a marker of racism.Ophelia Benson says:
October 25, 2012 at 12:30 pm
@ 93 – no, you’re wrong. Disproportionate obsessive hatred of a woman can be misogyny, or be a marker of misogyny.
I’ve put you in moderation; your comments don’t appear unless I approve them. Yes there’s a particular reason.
Best one there.Michael K Gray wrote:Dictionary - An evil rape manual written by the Elders of the Patriarchy. All of its entries are wrong, except where we agree with them, but we won't tell you what they are because they change like a whore's knickers, depending on what lie we are trying push at any time.
First of all, may we agree that being an atheist does not necessarily mean that a person is rational in any or all aspects of their life. Hopefully, those that come to the realization that there are no gods, well, they've become skeptics first, then over time, they will come to understand that many of the things they once thought were true, are not.sacha wrote:Outwest wrote:
*snip*
But there are other irrational things you might believe in, like sexism
believing in sexism is irrational. love this
As this cretinous, thoughtless, telling, astonishingly fucking ignorant, enraging Septic Tank-centric bullshit get on my tits as well, I refer you to two entries in the Angels' Glossary:Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:...And this is what is really starting to get on my fucking nerves. Stupid ass UScentric ignorant fuck!Outwest wrote: Is it fair to say that, on the whole, atheists aren’t that crazy about feminism?[/b]
... they live in the United States...
Post removed: Study looks at voting and hormones
A post previously published in this space regarding a study about how hormones may influence voting choices has been removed.
After further review it was determined that some elements of the story did not meet the editorial standards of CNN.
We thank you for your comments and feedback.
Underline mine. I'd be very curious to know how one would come to such a conclusion. (note: you said "can", not "is", so I might just be nitpicking.)Tigzy wrote:Fuckin stupid fuckin Benson is being stupid again: http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ent-320111
Hatred - disproportionate and obsessive or otherwise - of Islam can be a marker of racism.Ophelia Benson says:
October 25, 2012 at 12:30 pm
@ 93 – no, you’re wrong. Disproportionate obsessive hatred of a woman can be misogyny, or be a marker of misogyny.
I’ve put you in moderation; your comments don’t appear unless I approve them. Yes there’s a particular reason.
You've been criticising Islam a lot recently, haven't you Prune.
As far as I know OB is the authority on the subject so you should ask her.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Underline mine. I'd be very curious to know how one would come to such a conclusion. (note: you said "can", not "is", so I might just be nitpicking.)Tigzy wrote:Fuckin stupid fuckin Benson is being stupid again: http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ent-320111
Hatred - disproportionate and obsessive or otherwise - of Islam can be a marker of racism.Ophelia Benson says:
October 25, 2012 at 12:30 pm
@ 93 – no, you’re wrong. Disproportionate obsessive hatred of a woman can be misogyny, or be a marker of misogyny.
I’ve put you in moderation; your comments don’t appear unless I approve them. Yes there’s a particular reason.
You've been criticising Islam a lot recently, haven't you Prune.
Looking to piss off the Canucks, eh?Michael K Gray wrote: World, the
- Continental North America, (obviously excluding Hawaii, Puerto Rico, etc. But including Israel and the State of Ceepolk's Mum's basement)
Exactly correct.Outwest wrote:First of all, may we agree that being an atheist does not necessarily mean that a person is rational in any or all aspects of their life.
Arrggg!!! Exactly INCORRECT!Outwest wrote:Hopefully<sic>, those that come to the realization that there are no gods, well, they've become skeptics first, then over time, they will come to understand that many of the things they once thought were true, are not.
This part:As a man with a small penis. How dare you use my physical appearance as the butt of your insult.
Just like the NSW government who used having a small penis in a derogatory way as an acceptable insult for people who are speeding.
You are no better than the misogynist man you have ever encountered.
To use your own eloquent words... F___ you
CommenterSP
LocationDate and timeOctober 26, 2012, 10:36AM
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-a ... z2AMJk65pq
is a reference to this:Just like the NSW government who used having a small penis in a derogatory way as an acceptable insult for people who are speeding.
Oops!Lsuoma wrote:Looking to piss off the Canucks, eh?Michael K Gray wrote: World, the
- Continental North America, (obviously excluding Hawaii, Puerto Rico, etc. But including Israel and the State of Ceepolk's Mum's basement)
That article was awesome all by itself. Just sayin' :D As a woman who isn't a size 4 (and never will be unless I get cancer or develop some eating disorder), that bit made me laugh my ass off! Yes, I fluctuate from a size 10 to a size 12. I'm 5'6", medium build, have hips that were just fucking built to have children and a rather large chest thanks to years of swimming and a broad back. I *love* women who aren't toothpicks and who love the way they are. The caveat is if you get to an *unhealthy* weight then I'm not so on board. Anyway, thanks for sharing!!!!Couch wrote:I was speaking to a mainstream print journo friend yesterday (works for rupert) and she told me it hadn't escaped their attention that any opinion pieces touching on sexual poilitics will get heaps of traffic. She knew about 'yesterday's piece' in Slate, but was unaware of the backstory and hadn't heard of the author.
Anyway, as if on cue, there is this piece today in the main broadsheet daily in this part of the world:
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-a ... 28837.html
Outwest wrote:The bolding in the middle of the answer is mine. So, if all you are is an atheist, your priorities are out of order? Note also how we're all apparently white, midlle-class or above. Is this woman that dimwitted?Is it fair to say that, on the whole, atheists aren’t that crazy about feminism?
I think, for some people, atheism is the one minority identity they have. They’re not gay, they’re not black, they live in the United States, and a lot of them are middle-class or higher. Being an “atheist†is the one thing that they take on as their cause, and they think it’s the most important because it’s the only one that affects them. It puts their priorities out of order a little bit. Once you’ve figured out God doesn’t exist, that’s great! But there are other irrational things you might believe in, like sexism.
Maybe you're thinking of Stephunny Svan being moved from her house?Jan Steen wrote:I'm skeptical about this claim. Is Amy Roth really that stupid? Did she actually move because her home address, which anyone could have found easily with Google, was posted on a forum
W00t. And of course they look for things to whine about. It's more attention for them, and they'd rather blow a dead hobo than be ignored.WoolyBumblebee wrote:*Runs in, throws video on thread, runs out*
[youtube]ws5Bb9mRQJ4[/youtube]
Ophi and Stefunny should see it quicker if I post it here ;P LOL!
ENJOY! :dance:
Again with the shit thing. That's all Ophelia calls anyone. I'm a vicious piece of shit, Justicar is some other kind of shit.Tigzy wrote::lol: :lol: :lol: Priceless work here from Mr Plum:
http://i.imgur.com/5mjRY.png
http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ent-319113
Looking at her train of thought to me it seems she was talking about forced continuation of pregnancy from rape, even though that's not exactly what she wrote.Stephanie Zvan wrote: An unwanted pregnancy is not rape, but it is like a rape in many ways. When a pregnancy follows a rape, it is an extension of the betrayal and the trauma of the rape itself. Any individual victim may decide for their own reasons that they want to carry that pregnancy to term, but none of them should ever be pressured to do so, much less forced. (emphases mine)
Fecophelia Benson?welch wrote:Again with the shit thing. That's all Ophelia calls anyone. I'm a vicious piece of shit, Justicar is some other kind of shit.
Umbridge has a serious feces obsession going.
Fixed it betterpapillon wrote:Just tinkered with that for ya.Mykeru wrote:ReneeHendricks wrote:Hmm. Mykeru is compared to Bill O'Reilly and Howard Stern. Bit of an odd stretch there:
"Rage style". Hey, I'm not the one pissed off by a joke,sugarvinegarfried egg-tits.
Vacuous shitbag troll here reporting for duty!welch wrote:Again with the shit thing. That's all Ophelia calls anyone. I'm a vicious piece of shit, Justicar is some other kind of shit.Tigzy wrote::lol: :lol: :lol: Priceless work here from Mr Plum:
http://i.imgur.com/5mjRY.png
http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ent-319113
Umbridge has a serious feces obsession going.
Really? So what I've said is totally inappropriate ? What you are statingMichael K Gray wrote:Exactly correct.Outwest wrote:First of all, may we agree that being an atheist does not necessarily mean that a person is rational in any or all aspects of their life.Arrggg!!! Exactly INCORRECT!Outwest wrote:Hopefully<sic>, those that come to the realization that there are no gods, well, they've become skeptics first, then over time, they will come to understand that many of the things they once thought were true, are not.
More damn parochial assumptions! (You wouldn't be a US resident, I take it?)
Most folk on the planet, are lifelong atheists, by definition.
They never have to "come to the realization that there are no gods" because they were never infected by that criminal meme in the first place.
And for the "they've become skeptics first", well: NO.
Just NO. Look at the Chinese, as an example.
More nominal life-long atheists than in 2000x USAs. Yet they are rarely skeptical, given the profound and endemic socialised superstition that pervades every aspect of life.
You lot need constant reminders that there are billions of atheists in China and India who do not conform to your parochial generalisations one iota.
(Now you know Phil's & my Kryptonite: Blather as though the USA==The Whole World)
NP. Glad to be able to help ;-)Michael K Gray wrote:Oops!Lsuoma wrote:Looking to piss off the Canucks, eh?Michael K Gray wrote: World, the
- Continental North America, (obviously excluding Hawaii, Puerto Rico, etc. But including Israel and the State of Ceepolk's Mum's basement)
Ta. Now changed to "Continental USA..."
Fecophilia? Fecophagia?DownThunder wrote:Fecophelia Benson?welch wrote:Again with the shit thing. That's all Ophelia calls anyone. I'm a vicious piece of shit, Justicar is some other kind of shit.
Umbridge has a serious feces obsession going.
It isn't. Especially since before that she states:Guest wrote:For the sake of objectivity I'll be the devil's advocate here. I think hers is a case of bad 'mind-keyboard interfacing':Looking at her train of thought to me it seems she was talking about forced continuation of pregnancy from rape, even though that's not exactly what she wrote.Stephanie Zvan wrote: An unwanted pregnancy is not rape, but it is like a rape in many ways. When a pregnancy follows a rape, it is an extension of the betrayal and the trauma of the rape itself. Any individual victim may decide for their own reasons that they want to carry that pregnancy to term, but none of them should ever be pressured to do so, much less forced. (emphases mine)
Which isn't the same train of thought.Stephanie Zvan wrote:Yes, an unwanted pregnancy has many commonalities with rape.
Wouldn't work anyway, assuming that my assumption that you sport a todger is correct. Bzzzzt! No allowed!justinvacula wrote:Maybe I should take the 'gameplan' from Watson and company and start claiming that they are misandists and Watson is an "anti-man leader." I can then write an article for Slate about misandry in the skeptical community and hijack my speeches and panel appearances talking about how women have engaged in a campaign of hate against me and others as they have 'declared war.' Nah...I won't stoop to their level.
No, I agree, it's trivializing rape. Unwanted pregnancies are a lot of things, but "like rape" is not on that list, ( unless of course, it is caused BY rape. In that kind of case, and only that kind of case, I could agree)ReneeHendricks wrote:Ok, I can't stand it. I was just going to leave this alone because I have the feeling that not many will agree with me. But Asshat-Szvan's latest bit has a line in it (actually, twice but stated differently) that is bothering the shit out of me:
No. No, it's not. It is not a violent sexual assault upon your body and mental well-being. It's simply unwanted. To me, it's like night and day. Or perhaps I'm just letting my extreme distaste of Szvan color my perception. Either way, that line just bothers the shit out of me.An unwanted pregnancy is not rape, but it is like a rape in many ways.
It is a lovely thought though, isn't it?justinvacula wrote:Maybe I should take the 'gameplan' from Watson and company and start claiming that they are misandists and Watson is an "anti-man leader." I can then write an article for Slate about misandry in the skeptical community and hijack my speeches and panel appearances talking about how women have engaged in a campaign of hate against me and others as they have 'declared war.' Nah...I won't stoop to their level.
Not just Slate now, but Jezebel too.justinvacula wrote:Maybe I should take the 'gameplan' from Watson and company and start claiming that they are misandists and Watson is an "anti-man leader." I can then write an article for Slate about misandry in the skeptical community and hijack my speeches and panel appearances talking about how women have engaged in a campaign of hate against me and others as they have 'declared war.' Nah...I won't stoop to their level.
If only that could ever work. :lol: But feminism is what sells. What you would have to instead would be try to argue that they are actually anti-Women in disguise (in truthfulness at least it seems they don't really care about women's rights unless it fits their personal agenda).justinvacula wrote:Maybe I should take the 'gameplan' from Watson and company and start claiming that they are misandists and Watson is an "anti-man leader." I can then write an article for Slate about misandry in the skeptical community and hijack my speeches and panel appearances talking about how women have engaged in a campaign of hate against me and others as they have 'declared war.' Nah...I won't stoop to their level.
Conceded. That phrase is hard to defend.ReneeHendricks wrote: It isn't. Especially since before that she states:Which isn't the same train of thought.Stephanie Zvan wrote:Yes, an unwanted pregnancy has many commonalities with rape.
Thems fighting words!!!! :popcorn:Outwest wrote: Before you comment, please make sure you do your research.
Ugghhhh ... Old Brigadier Pudding!Lsuoma wrote:Fecophilia? Fecophagia?DownThunder wrote:Fecophelia Benson?welch wrote:Again with the shit thing. That's all Ophelia calls anyone. I'm a vicious piece of shit, Justicar is some other kind of shit.
Umbridge has a serious feces obsession going.
My bold. It's nothing like what she wrote. And certainly not what she meant. Examine her history and you will see clearly: she believes that an unwanted pregnancy arising from not-non-consensual sex, is very much like rape. No matter that the woman was a willing participant in the shenanigans that led to the awful, unbearable horror of growing a tiny person in her tummy; all sex is rape when you're crazy as a cunt, like Stephany.Guest wrote:For the sake of objectivity I'll be the devil's advocate here. I think hers is a case of bad 'mind-keyboard interfacing':Looking at her train of thought to me it seems she was talking about forced continuation of pregnancy from rape, even though that's not exactly what she wrote.Stephanie Zvan wrote: An unwanted pregnancy is not rape, but it is like a rape in many ways. When a pregnancy follows a rape, it is an extension of the betrayal and the trauma of the rape itself. Any individual victim may decide for their own reasons that they want to carry that pregnancy to term, but none of them should ever be pressured to do so, much less forced. (emphases mine)
Argh! I was thrown off by different article names. Really...after a certain time at night, I just need to step away from the linking.Notung wrote:Hehe! They were both written by some strange person named 'Skeptic Ink'.
I think it's probably a lesser-known version, Convenient Prosopagnosia. Or possibly Prosopagnosia by Proxy.BarnOwl wrote:WRT the "face blindness" excuse for not recognizing Elevator Guy - I think it's important to reiterate that Watson claimed to have transient prosopagnosia. Several types of prosopagnosia (developmental, associative, etc.) have been described, but "transient" is not one of them. I suppose it's formally possible that alcohol intoxication could selectively affect the fusiform gyrus, yet leave the ability to remember the elevator conversation completely intact.
But I doubt it.
If I understand this correctly .... trying to parse out this postulated sex (or turkey baster) leading to preggers-is-a-form-of-rape and thus presumeably when she willingly participitated in the sex (or turkey basting), leading to this form of rape she was indulging in some sort of self-abuse and/or raping herself?ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:My bold. It's nothing like what she wrote. And certainly not what she meant. Examine her history and you will see clearly: she believes that an unwanted pregnancy arising from not-non-consensual sex, is very much like rape. No matter that the woman was a willing participant in the shenanigans that led to the awful, unbearable horror of growing a tiny person in her tummy; all sex is rape when you're crazy as a cunt, like Stephany.Guest wrote:For the sake of objectivity I'll be the devil's advocate here. I think hers is a case of bad 'mind-keyboard interfacing':Looking at her train of thought to me it seems she was talking about forced continuation of pregnancy from rape, even though that's not exactly what she wrote.Stephanie Zvan wrote: An unwanted pregnancy is not rape, but it is like a rape in many ways. When a pregnancy follows a rape, it is an extension of the betrayal and the trauma of the rape itself. Any individual victim may decide for their own reasons that they want to carry that pregnancy to term, but none of them should ever be pressured to do so, much less forced. (emphases mine)
Which pushes me to ask "so why did you do a marketing degree instead of a hard science one?".I’ve long been interested in science and critical thinking.
Which pushes me to ask "so why can you never provide evidence for the accusations you spew?".I’ve spent years as a skeptic and a believer in science
Sweet! Lots of paying gigs for the regulars here to prove what a lying, duplicitous, incompetent, self-centered, vacuous cunt she is.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Anyway, it's not funny, but it does show that she is preparing to inveigle her way into some nice paying jobs in the media. A page search for "scie*" gives 8 hits. Be warned, she is overstating her credentials to credulous media people, and she is doing it very well. Expect to see her continue to rise, and to see a lot more of her, including on your tellyvis screens. You heard it here...first?
Did I miss the screeching over Amanda Todd? I don't recall that. I may have been busy lately, but I think I wouldn't have missed that. Why do I feel that a search would just be a waste of time....but they wouldn't be baboons if they knew how to use a search engine properly, wouldn't they?Jan Steen wrote:
This one believes in fairy tales too:
http://i.imgur.com/GVYYU.jpg
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-478544
Free thinking: you're doing it wrong.
I think she does her thinking with her lower half. With her between that and her cunt-kick fetish, you have to wonder.welch wrote:Again with the shit thing. That's all Ophelia calls anyone. I'm a vicious piece of shit, Justicar is some other kind of shit.Tigzy wrote::lol: :lol: :lol: Priceless work here from Mr Plum:
http://i.imgur.com/5mjRY.png
http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ent-319113
Umbridge has a serious feces obsession going.