Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

Old subthreads
TedDahlberg
.
.
Posts: 1111
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:08 am

Re: It's a shame!!11!!!

#17881

Post by TedDahlberg »

BarnOwl wrote:For shame! Shamefully shaming Greta's shame-porn shame!
Sigh.
Okay. Let me spell this out, as patiently as I possibly can.
I am entirely happy to consensually eroticize shame in my sexual fantasies and my sex life. It is a central part of my sexuality, it makes me happy, and I am at peace with it.
But I don’t appreciate being non-consensually shamed about my sexuality.
Consensual SM — including the consensual eroticization of shame — is just as psychologically healthy as any other consensual sexuality. There’s a significant body of evidence backing this up, and a large community of happy, healthy kinksters who will testify to it. Again: I don’t consider it “unlucky” to be kinky, or to have the particular kinks that I have. A lot of people eroticize shame: I’m not the only one. And I find it troubling that people would not only consider themselves “lucky” to not find shame sexually appealing… but would say this to kinky people, to their faces, in a space dedicated to talking about their kink.
These are people who would almost certainly not tell gay people that they consider themselves “lucky” not to be gay, or that they are “concerned” about their gayness. But kinky people, apparently, can’t expect get the same kind of respect.
This sort of “concern” for the people who practice it, however well-meaning, is part of what stigmatizes us and marginalizes us. It makes it harder to live our lives. Please stop it. Thank you.
It would be a shame if you didn't stop shaming the shame of oppressed shame-porn-lovers so shamefully! Shame on your shame-blame and shame-hate! Shamist!
http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2 ... Seamus.jpg

Seamus?

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17882

Post by JackSkeptic »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I will note the Pit is slowing down a bit these days, in terms of comments. As with creationist-bashing forums, I will take it as a good sign. Maybe there's a bit less crazy flying around right now?
Yep. But I'm sure many are still reading, I am at least. Knowing the 'other side' they are bound to do or say something amazingly dumb sooner or later. They are the gift that never stops giving.

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: It's a shame!!11!!!

#17883

Post by Dick Strawkins »

BarnOwl wrote:For shame! Shamefully shaming Greta's shame-porn shame!
Sigh.
Okay. Let me spell this out, as patiently as I possibly can.
I am entirely happy to consensually eroticize shame in my sexual fantasies and my sex life. It is a central part of my sexuality, it makes me happy, and I am at peace with it.
But I don’t appreciate being non-consensually shamed about my sexuality.
Consensual SM — including the consensual eroticization of shame — is just as psychologically healthy as any other consensual sexuality. There’s a significant body of evidence backing this up, and a large community of happy, healthy kinksters who will testify to it. Again: I don’t consider it “unlucky” to be kinky, or to have the particular kinks that I have. A lot of people eroticize shame: I’m not the only one. And I find it troubling that people would not only consider themselves “lucky” to not find shame sexually appealing… but would say this to kinky people, to their faces, in a space dedicated to talking about their kink.
These are people who would almost certainly not tell gay people that they consider themselves “lucky” not to be gay, or that they are “concerned” about their gayness. But kinky people, apparently, can’t expect get the same kind of respect.
This sort of “concern” for the people who practice it, however well-meaning, is part of what stigmatizes us and marginalizes us. It makes it harder to live our lives. Please stop it. Thank you.
It would be a shame if you didn't stop shaming the shame of oppressed shame-porn-lovers so shamefully! Shame on your shame-blame and shame-hate! Shamist!

I think I've mentioned before that there is a huge schism in waiting in the middle of the united front of FTB feminists.
Greta Christina has far more in common with the likes of sex positive individuals (both male and female) than she does with the Shakesville loonies. She, as a porn producer, is a textbook example of a rape enabler - so long as you are reading a radfem approved textbook.

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17884

Post by JackSkeptic »

Nim_Chimpsky wrote:
AndrewV69 wrote:
I will just leave this here:

[youtube]nvYyGTmcP80[/youtube]

YMMV

It seems to me that such feminists hold that no possible observation could ever falsify or bring into question the existence of the patriarchy. This video seems to be a prime example, any suggestion that might undermine the all encompassing nature of the patriarchy is in-fact evidence for its existence. It's a bit like Freudian or Marxist theories which can always avoid falsification by adding ad-hoc hypotheses or assertions that keep their theory valid regardless of any observation to the contrary. In order for the notion of 'The Patriarchy' to make any sense there must be some possible observation(s) which would falsify it or at least undermine the concept.
Yes it's a tactic commonly employed by many ideologues as well as statements such as 'Feminism is the radical notion that women are people'. It is a form of poisoning the well often called a Kafka trap http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2122 and as you say is unfalsifiable which blows it out of the water as far as certainty. That does not necessarily make the concepts invalid but it does mean they must be treated with due care. If they require a Kafka trap style of arguing along with appeals to emotion, overt aggression, cult tactics of 'shunning' and ad hominems to support what they say then as far as I am concerned their 'theories' are useless and no more than interesting ideas.

The whole of Atheism Plus is based on this approach (such as mansplaining, intersectionality and patriarchy of course) so I find their claims to be skeptics hilarious. I don't think they know what that actually means.

What I find incredible is people who show good critical thinking skills when it comes to most things fail to use them when they fall for the SJW narrative. Like religion it is an emotionally based philosophy which is why I treat them the same as I would religious extremists. It is incredible how many similarities there are. They are the Utra-Orthodox or Puritans of Atheism. I sometimes wonder if it is a coincidence that this sort of extreme social belief mainly happens in a country where we also see extreme forms of religious beliefs, historically and now.

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17885

Post by JackSkeptic »

Dilurk wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I will note the Pit is slowing down a bit these days, in terms of comments. As with creationist-bashing forums, I will take it as a good sign. Maybe there's a bit less crazy flying around right now?
There is a lot of ongoing discussion between everyone and it's not just at the nugent blog.

Yes there are going to remain some hard core ideologues (crazies) who will not want to talk but the saner
ones are.

There are a ton of other boards here so perhaps some of the activity will move off of here as things progress.
This is not a bad thing IMO.
I have also noticed a general awareness across other communities. SJW's are like an infection which spreads and the atheist community is not the first or the last.

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: It's a shame!!11!!!

#17886

Post by JackSkeptic »

Dick Strawkins wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:For shame! Shamefully shaming Greta's shame-porn shame!
Sigh.
Okay. Let me spell this out, as patiently as I possibly can.
I am entirely happy to consensually eroticize shame in my sexual fantasies and my sex life. It is a central part of my sexuality, it makes me happy, and I am at peace with it.
But I don’t appreciate being non-consensually shamed about my sexuality.
Consensual SM — including the consensual eroticization of shame — is just as psychologically healthy as any other consensual sexuality. There’s a significant body of evidence backing this up, and a large community of happy, healthy kinksters who will testify to it. Again: I don’t consider it “unlucky” to be kinky, or to have the particular kinks that I have. A lot of people eroticize shame: I’m not the only one. And I find it troubling that people would not only consider themselves “lucky” to not find shame sexually appealing… but would say this to kinky people, to their faces, in a space dedicated to talking about their kink.
These are people who would almost certainly not tell gay people that they consider themselves “lucky” not to be gay, or that they are “concerned” about their gayness. But kinky people, apparently, can’t expect get the same kind of respect.
This sort of “concern” for the people who practice it, however well-meaning, is part of what stigmatizes us and marginalizes us. It makes it harder to live our lives. Please stop it. Thank you.
It would be a shame if you didn't stop shaming the shame of oppressed shame-porn-lovers so shamefully! Shame on your shame-blame and shame-hate! Shamist!

I think I've mentioned before that there is a huge schism in waiting in the middle of the united front of FTB feminists.
Greta Christina has far more in common with the likes of sex positive individuals (both male and female) than she does with the Shakesville loonies. She, as a porn producer, is a textbook example of a rape enabler - so long as you are reading a radfem approved textbook.
Greta was on the Thinking Athesit podcast recently and I keep meaning to listen to it:

http://www.thethinkingatheist.com/podcast/index

I think it is easy to forget that when not talking about their social and political beliefs and sticking to atheism or similar they are valuable members of the atheist community. I think Carrier can be good when he sticks to what he knows. I just wish they would all stick to what they know and keep their personal political biases to themselves or a community that is inherently political, which we are not. If I want social philosophy I'll get that elsewhere thanks.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17887

Post by Southern »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I will note the Pit is slowing down a bit these days, in terms of comments. As with creationist-bashing forums, I will take it as a good sign. Maybe there's a bit less crazy flying around right now?
You remember what happened last time, right? Lsuoma wanted to close the pit because it had lost its edge, it has no point anymore, yadda-yadda, and then... BAM! Craziness insued.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: It's a shame!!11!!!

#17888

Post by Southern »

Dick Strawkins wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:For shame! Shamefully shaming Greta's shame-porn shame!
Sigh.
Okay. Let me spell this out, as patiently as I possibly can.
I am entirely happy to consensually eroticize shame in my sexual fantasies and my sex life. It is a central part of my sexuality, it makes me happy, and I am at peace with it.
But I don’t appreciate being non-consensually shamed about my sexuality.
Consensual SM — including the consensual eroticization of shame — is just as psychologically healthy as any other consensual sexuality. There’s a significant body of evidence backing this up, and a large community of happy, healthy kinksters who will testify to it. Again: I don’t consider it “unlucky” to be kinky, or to have the particular kinks that I have. A lot of people eroticize shame: I’m not the only one. And I find it troubling that people would not only consider themselves “lucky” to not find shame sexually appealing… but would say this to kinky people, to their faces, in a space dedicated to talking about their kink.
These are people who would almost certainly not tell gay people that they consider themselves “lucky” not to be gay, or that they are “concerned” about their gayness. But kinky people, apparently, can’t expect get the same kind of respect.
This sort of “concern” for the people who practice it, however well-meaning, is part of what stigmatizes us and marginalizes us. It makes it harder to live our lives. Please stop it. Thank you.
It would be a shame if you didn't stop shaming the shame of oppressed shame-porn-lovers so shamefully! Shame on your shame-blame and shame-hate! Shamist!

I think I've mentioned before that there is a huge schism in waiting in the middle of the united front of FTB feminists.
Greta Christina has far more in common with the likes of sex positive individuals (both male and female) than she does with the Shakesville loonies. She, as a porn producer, is a textbook example of a rape enabler - so long as you are reading a radfem approved textbook.
This next schism will be hilarious. Greta Christina, porn writer extraordinaire and rape eneabler, versus Ophelia Benson, guardian of purity and high moral standards of women. Place your bets and grab the popcorn.

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: It's a shame!!11!!!

#17889

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Southern wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:For shame! Shamefully shaming Greta's shame-porn shame!
Sigh.
Okay. Let me spell this out, as patiently as I possibly can.
I am entirely happy to consensually eroticize shame in my sexual fantasies and my sex life. It is a central part of my sexuality, it makes me happy, and I am at peace with it.
But I don’t appreciate being non-consensually shamed about my sexuality.
Consensual SM — including the consensual eroticization of shame — is just as psychologically healthy as any other consensual sexuality. There’s a significant body of evidence backing this up, and a large community of happy, healthy kinksters who will testify to it. Again: I don’t consider it “unlucky” to be kinky, or to have the particular kinks that I have. A lot of people eroticize shame: I’m not the only one. And I find it troubling that people would not only consider themselves “lucky” to not find shame sexually appealing… but would say this to kinky people, to their faces, in a space dedicated to talking about their kink.
These are people who would almost certainly not tell gay people that they consider themselves “lucky” not to be gay, or that they are “concerned” about their gayness. But kinky people, apparently, can’t expect get the same kind of respect.
This sort of “concern” for the people who practice it, however well-meaning, is part of what stigmatizes us and marginalizes us. It makes it harder to live our lives. Please stop it. Thank you.
It would be a shame if you didn't stop shaming the shame of oppressed shame-porn-lovers so shamefully! Shame on your shame-blame and shame-hate! Shamist!

I think I've mentioned before that there is a huge schism in waiting in the middle of the united front of FTB feminists.
Greta Christina has far more in common with the likes of sex positive individuals (both male and female) than she does with the Shakesville loonies. She, as a porn producer, is a textbook example of a rape enabler - so long as you are reading a radfem approved textbook.
This next schism will be hilarious. Greta Christina, porn writer extraordinaire and rape eneabler, versus Ophelia Benson, guardian of purity and high moral standards of women. Place your bets and grab the popcorn.
I don't think Ophelia will be the one who sparks schism+
She has had many opportunities to do so in the past (for example Peezus' misogynistic behavior onstage at Skepticon3) but has never done so. I guess she values the appearance of a united front more highly than she does of sticking to her principles.
In my opinion the schism will occur when an external party decides to take them on - most likely someone like McEwan at Shakesville.
So far McEwan has only picked on piddlingly small stuff but at some stage she's going to find out about the "lets do the sex thing later" Skepticon performance and PZs love of hentai rape pictures and whenever that happens, I'm right there with you, popcorn in hand.

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: It's a shame!!11!!!

#17890

Post by JackSkeptic »

Southern wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:For shame! Shamefully shaming Greta's shame-porn shame!
Sigh.
Okay. Let me spell this out, as patiently as I possibly can.
I am entirely happy to consensually eroticize shame in my sexual fantasies and my sex life. It is a central part of my sexuality, it makes me happy, and I am at peace with it.
But I don’t appreciate being non-consensually shamed about my sexuality.
Consensual SM — including the consensual eroticization of shame — is just as psychologically healthy as any other consensual sexuality. There’s a significant body of evidence backing this up, and a large community of happy, healthy kinksters who will testify to it. Again: I don’t consider it “unlucky” to be kinky, or to have the particular kinks that I have. A lot of people eroticize shame: I’m not the only one. And I find it troubling that people would not only consider themselves “lucky” to not find shame sexually appealing… but would say this to kinky people, to their faces, in a space dedicated to talking about their kink.
These are people who would almost certainly not tell gay people that they consider themselves “lucky” not to be gay, or that they are “concerned” about their gayness. But kinky people, apparently, can’t expect get the same kind of respect.
This sort of “concern” for the people who practice it, however well-meaning, is part of what stigmatizes us and marginalizes us. It makes it harder to live our lives. Please stop it. Thank you.
It would be a shame if you didn't stop shaming the shame of oppressed shame-porn-lovers so shamefully! Shame on your shame-blame and shame-hate! Shamist!

I think I've mentioned before that there is a huge schism in waiting in the middle of the united front of FTB feminists.
Greta Christina has far more in common with the likes of sex positive individuals (both male and female) than she does with the Shakesville loonies. She, as a porn producer, is a textbook example of a rape enabler - so long as you are reading a radfem approved textbook.
This next schism will be hilarious. Greta Christina, porn writer extraordinaire and rape eneabler, versus Ophelia Benson, guardian of purity and high moral standards of women. Place your bets and grab the popcorn.
Yes and their vitriol will be their own undoing, look at how quickly and viciously they dispatched one of their closest allies and vocal supports, EllenBeth Wachs. They really do mix up being assertive when expressing beliefs and ideas with being intolerant, myopic and nasty pieces of work.

JAB
.
.
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:04 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17891

Post by JAB »

Yeah, you folks aren't entertaining the lurker in me nearly enough lately. I mean, I can actually keep up and have a life.

I'm going to hang in there though and keep reading because I also see 2 looming opportunities for fun.... the conference in Dublin, and Justin's walk in the lion's den.

Remick
.
.
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:47 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17892

Post by Remick »

[quote="Git"

Ah, typical fucking Plastic Yank. Now at least, with the Boston bombs, you bastards finally realise what you were funding in my country for decades.

[/quote]

Honestly, go fuck yourself Git. The people who funded the IRA from America were Irish immigrants. Maybe if you actually let them have their independence the right way, they wouldn't have existed. But no, blame all Americans for what some Irish Americans chose to fund.

You seem to just be a bitter, pitiful man. /ignore

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17893

Post by Dick Strawkins »

What's happening with Taslima these days :shock:

http://i.imgur.com/f1VEVHp.jpg

:popcorn:

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17894

Post by Southern »

Dick Strawkins wrote:What's happening with Taslima these days :shock:

http://i.imgur.com/f1VEVHp.jpg

:popcorn:
That settles it, then.

http://i.imgur.com/mS1407C.jpg

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17895

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Wait!
There's more!

http://i.imgur.com/TTayGcV.jpg

So penis size correlates with propensity to rape? :think:

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17896

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Dick Strawkins wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/TTayGcV.jpg
I think I should just point out to the slymepit ladies, you are in absolutely no danger of getting raped by me.
And I don't have a Ferrari ;)

Submariner
.
.
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:05 pm
Location: Florida, US of A
Contact:

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17897

Post by Submariner »

So tell me is this commenter Steersman or just his clone:


Well sir, maybe I give folks that make such remarks too much credit. But the people that I hear making that kind of claim are typically straight, so they're not speaking from experience. And given the individual factors that go into "winning a mate" (or a one-night stand) include things like confidence, physical attractiveness, "status," and the like--the "playing field" is already for from being "even," and therefore a less than apt laboratory for testing such a hypothesis. So, not "really."

TedDahlberg
.
.
Posts: 1111
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:08 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17898

Post by TedDahlberg »

Dick Strawkins wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/TTayGcV.jpg
I think I should just point out to the slymepit ladies, you are in absolutely no danger of getting raped by me.
And I don't have a Ferrari ;)
Ah, you're poor and impotent ;)

Submariner
.
.
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:05 pm
Location: Florida, US of A
Contact:

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17899

Post by Submariner »

Dick Strawkins wrote:Wait!
There's more!

http://i.imgur.com/TTayGcV.jpg
Social Justice Warrior Syndrome: The condition that causes people to correlate absolutely everything to rape.

Outwest
.
.
Posts: 448
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:01 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17900

Post by Outwest »

JAB wrote:Yeah, you folks aren't entertaining the lurker in me nearly enough lately. I mean, I can actually keep up and have a life.

I'm going to hang in there though and keep reading because I also see 2 looming opportunities for fun.... the conference in Dublin, and Justin's walk in the lion's den.
I was just thinking that. Those two conferences should provide some good fodder for the 'Pit.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17901

Post by Southern »

Dick Strawkins wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/TTayGcV.jpg
Men by feminists, a Java approach:

Code: Select all

public class Man implements Patriarchy, RapeCulture, Misogyny {

     private String name;
     private int age;
     private float penisSize;

     /* Rapes the nearest woman available */
     public void doRape(Woman woman);

     public static void main (String args[]) {
         Man man = new Man();
         Woman woman = new Woman();
		 /* Implemented by TN */
         if (man.penisSize == Penis.SMALL) {
             man.doRape(woman);
         }
         else if (man.penisSize != Penis.SMALL) {
             man.doRape(woman)
         }
		 /* Implemented by RW */
         if (woman.getNumberDrinks() > 0) {
		     man.doRape(woman);
		 }
         /* Implemented by EBW */
         if (man.getName() == 'Justin Vacula') {
             man.doRapeYourDaughter(woman);
         }
     }
}

Remick
.
.
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:47 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17902

Post by Remick »

Dick Strawkins wrote:Wait!
There's more!

http://i.imgur.com/TTayGcV.jpg

So penis size correlates with propensity to rape? :think:

Even more telling, she sees penis size as manhood. As in men with small penises are less manly not really men. Wonder how she would react if people referred to breast size as womanhood....

FrankGrimes
.
.
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:55 am
Location: Below a Bowling Alley

Re: Jim the Catholic Made Me Do It

#17903

Post by FrankGrimes »

Michael K Gray wrote:Worth revisiting, for an effulgent moral uplift against conceited genocidal true misogynist turds:
Bishop fuckin' Someoneorother, the shamefully appalling Anne Widdecome
versus the exceedingly moral atheists:
Christopher Hitchens, and Steven Fry.
[youtube]LrIHw0fZNOA[/youtube]
Show it to every Cat-lick with whom you may have had the misfortune to be acquainted.

Repeatedly.
Damn you for reminding me!It's late here!

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Taslima Nasreen Made Me Do It

#17904

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Small Brain Syndrome: The condition that compels Taslima Nasreen to overcompensate for her lack of intelligence by attempting to explain a complex issue in 140 characters.

Remick
.
.
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:47 pm

Re: Taslima Nasreen Made Me Do It

#17905

Post by Remick »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Small Brain Syndrome: The condition that compels Taslima Nasreen to overcompensate for her lack of intelligence by attempting to explain a complex issue in 140 characters.
Interesting, if a person with a small penis isn't a man(because it takes a big penis to be a man), then aren't they a victim rather than perp?

TheMudbrooker
.
.
Posts: 786
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:15 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17906

Post by TheMudbrooker »

Michael K Gray wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Oh, ok, seems we're on to another flamewar.

Just for reminder: the US Post Office worker who refused to give me my mail because I was wearing a Deicide band T-shirt.
She was a CUBAN ILLEGAL
It's impossible to be an illegal Cuban immigrant in the United States. Cubans are either "dryfoot" meaning they've physically set foot on American soil and are automatically granted political asylum or they are "wetfoot" which means they were caught by the Border Patrol before they made landfall and are automatically deported.
There is no third option.

Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17907

Post by Altair »

PZ has a post in which he tries to distance himself from the TransWoman Hating Radfems by .... aligning himself with Twisty Faster, from I Blame the Patriarchy.

http://www.freezepage.com/1366730300PGGABLZUZK
The most “radical feminist” feminist I read religiously has got to be Twisty Faster, at I Blame the Patriarchy. She’s a ferociously passionate writer, and simply brilliant in her insights. So when we had the recent hatin’ and shriekin’ from #radfem2013, I had to wonder (maybe that’s the wrong word; I had high expectations) what Twisty would be saying on the issue. And have no fear, she’s all over it.
So he reads her religiously and thinks she's brilliant. She's so brilliant and radical that she's actually disliked by a bunch of other feminists (check the bottom for Steersman style references ;) ), including someone named Ik who commented at Crom's place a while ago (is he/she a regular?)
31
ik

July 18, 2012 at 6:51 am (UTC 0)

Unfortunately the straw feminists DO exist. THey are rare and are scorned by most feminists. I’d say that Twisty Faster fits the bill.
I think PZ's obsession with proving he's the most feminist guy evar is going to keep misfiring. First it was the McEwan thing, and now the people who think Twisty is "fucking insane" will probably "target" him as well.

[1] http://pervocracy.blogspot.com/2009/02/ ... nsane.html
[2] http://bellesbookshelf.blogspot.com/201 ... s-not.html
[3] http://globalcomment.com/acting-like-a- ... ment-make/

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17908

Post by Pitchguest »

Nice find, Altair. But what really makes me snicker is in the comments they're talking about less intelligent people and how badly they're treated, which of course took me back to PZ's previous blog post where he called a commenter a "fucking idiot." :lol:

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17909

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Submariner wrote:
Social Justice Warrior Syndrome: The condition that causes people to correlate absolutely everything to rape.
That's a meme dying to be born.....

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17910

Post by Tony Parsehole »


Submariner
.
.
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:05 pm
Location: Florida, US of A
Contact:

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17911

Post by Submariner »


Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17912

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Hehe.
Actually, now that I think about it, there are two ways to interpret that image and caption.
Freudian slip?

Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17913

Post by Altair »

Pitchguest wrote:Nice find, Altair. But what really makes me snicker is in the comments they're talking about less intelligent people and how badly they're treated, which of course took me back to PZ's previous blog post where he called a commenter a "fucking idiot." :lol:
The comments are pretty crazy ehmm nuts, mentally imbalanced in a non-ableist way over there. What they seem to be saying is that applying tests to find qualified people for a job is discrimination against those less qualified :think:

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17914

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Altair wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:Nice find, Altair. But what really makes me snicker is in the comments they're talking about less intelligent people and how badly they're treated, which of course took me back to PZ's previous blog post where he called a commenter a "fucking idiot." :lol:
The comments are pretty crazy ehmm nuts, mentally imbalanced in a non-ableist way over there. What they seem to be saying is that applying tests to find qualified people for a job is discrimination against those less qualified :think:
It IS discrimination against the less qualified but that's the WHOLE FUCKING POINT of applying tests. :lol:

Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17915

Post by Altair »

Tony Parsehole wrote:
Altair wrote: The comments are pretty crazy ehmm nuts, mentally imbalanced in a non-ableist way over there. What they seem to be saying is that applying tests to find qualified people for a job is discrimination against those less qualified :think:
It IS discrimination against the less qualified but that's the WHOLE FUCKING POINT of applying tests. :lol:
You, you ... qualifyist! :crying-blue:

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17916

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Job interviews are proof of patriarchy.
I always wanted to be a brain surgeon but those idiots wanted me to be "qualified". Fuck 'em. Their loss.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17917

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Altair wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
Altair wrote: The comments are pretty crazy ehmm nuts, mentally imbalanced in a non-ableist way over there. What they seem to be saying is that applying tests to find qualified people for a job is discrimination against those less qualified :think:
It IS discrimination against the less qualified but that's the WHOLE FUCKING POINT of applying tests. :lol:
You, you ... qualifyist! :crying-blue:
Shit like that is the logical conclusion of having a strong SJW mindset. They've twisted the meanings of discrimination and inequality to such a point that the see all discrimination and inequality as automatically "bad".

Ericb
.
.
Posts: 881
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:20 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17918

Post by Ericb »

Looks like the Catholic Church is now trying to drive people away from Jesus:

http://animalnewyork.com/2013/new-ad-by ... l-hipster/

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17919

Post by Pitchguest »

The other thing to mention is that PZ said he didn't deny radical feminists existed (even though he stated in another blog post that, to him, "radical feminist" is a bit like "militant atheist"), and now he brings up Twisty Faster from I Blame the Patriarchy? I don't buy it. Unless there's evidence to prove otherwise, I'd wager a guess that the suggestion of Twisty Faster was made to him very recently - like a couple of days recently.

I mean, if he reads her "religiously", and probably for a while, then surely even he couldn't have missed the suggestions (or demands) that women should never, ever enter into a relationship with a man, or that women shouldn't have a legal right to consent because then technically all intercourse is rape and so on? And worse, calling these insights "brilliant"? Or maybe the problem *is* that he's reading her religiously and thus feels the need to make excuses? It could happen. He still puts quotation marks around "radical feminist" implying that he still thinks they're not as corporeal as they actually are (but pretty fucking stupid seeing as Esteleth describes herself as a radical feminist, and so does Twisty Faster for that matter).

:confusion-confused:

Submariner
.
.
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:05 pm
Location: Florida, US of A
Contact:

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17920

Post by Submariner »

Did anyone else see this? I was unable to verify that this person is the actual ex-wife of the man referenced in the video. Maybe someone with better Google-fu....


[youtube]JARBHr253NI[/youtube]

JAB
.
.
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:04 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17921

Post by JAB »

Up here in Canada we usually grow our canola (aka oil seed rape) on flatter ground than that.

Percentage
.
.
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:52 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17922

Post by Percentage »

Actually, I'm not surprised Peezus reads Twisty Faster "religiously" (lol). Thinking about it, he and Twisty subscribe to a similar brand of feminism. She's a (relatively, which I suppose isn't saying much given her company) sophisticated radical feminist who breaks with them on some of their more batshit positions. She's also trans-positive. (And sex-negative, but hush hush let's just move on.)

She's a pretty good writer, but not as good as she thinks she is. She can have some good insights once in a while, but more often than not just comes across as obnoxious and arrogant.

Honestly, that seems to describe Peez in a nutshell, too.

Percentage
.
.
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:52 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17923

Post by Percentage »

Pitchguest, Peezus has linked to I Blame the Patriarchy on his sidebar since FtB began. He actually is a legit Twisty fan.

Metalogic42
.
.
Posts: 1252
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:56 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17924

Post by Metalogic42 »

Dick Strawkins wrote:
Dilurk wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I will note the Pit is slowing down a bit these days, in terms of comments. As with creationist-bashing forums, I will take it as a good sign. Maybe there's a bit less crazy flying around right now?
There is a lot of ongoing discussion between everyone and it's not just at the nugent blog.

Yes there are going to remain some hard core ideologues (crazies) who will not want to talk but the saner
ones are.

There are a ton of other boards here so perhaps some of the activity will move off of here as things progress.
This is not a bad thing IMO.
I agree to a certain extent.
We've developed a community here over the past 8 or 9 months that seems to have different values and abilities compared to certain other atheist boards. We've trained ourselves on exposing Myers and his bunch as a growing problem in online atheism. We, along with the unwitting help of Richard Carrier and their moderators, managed to kill off atheism-plus in a matter of months. That 'movement', supposedly the vehicle that would carry through Myers vision of atheism, is now little more than an embarrasing sideshow - a Frankensteins monster dressed in a clown-costume.
FTB is a failing brand. They don't seem to realize it but the life support has been switched off and we're all just waiting for the inevitable end.
So what do WE do next?
I think that the strengths of the slymepit are primarily in its exposure of hypocrisy and the ridicule of demagogues.
Who is next on the list?
I'm not sure how accurate this is, but I've heard some people say that SJWs are quite common on sites like reddit and tumblr lately.

Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17925

Post by Altair »

Metalogic42 wrote: I'm not sure how accurate this is, but I've heard some people say that SJWs are quite common on sites like reddit and tumblr lately.
I don't know how reddit works, but from what I've seen, Tumblr's format doesn't lend itself to conversation and debate, so maybe SJW's are retreating to grounds where they won't be constantly asked for evidence and citations.

Percentage
.
.
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:52 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17926

Post by Percentage »

Tumblr is chock full of SJWs. Reddit, not so much. They exist, but they're generally limited to a few specific subreddits and everyone else hates them.

So yeah, basically, I'd agree that SJWs tend to aggregate in places where they don't have to deal with criticism.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17927

Post by Tigzy »

Remick wrote:
Git wrote:
Ah, typical fucking Plastic Yank. Now at least, with the Boston bombs, you bastards finally realise what you were funding in my country for decades.

Honestly, go fuck yourself Git. The people who funded the IRA from America were Irish immigrants. Maybe if you actually let them have their independence the right way, they wouldn't have existed. But no, blame all Americans for what some Irish Americans chose to fund.

You seem to just be a bitter, pitiful man. /ignore
The people who funded the IRA from America were largely Americans of Irish ancestry, not immigrants. Amongst this you can count a few dimwits who thought they were Irish because they mistook their Scottish surname for an Irish one, as well as no doubt a few 'Redcoats Out!' chickenhawk dildoes, along with some well-meaning individuals who took Clan na Gael and NORAID's 'widows and childrens' spiel at face value.

However, before this comes across as sounding like a rant against Irish Americans - it should be noted that the provisional IRA's biggest supplier in terms of money, arms and training was Libya. In fact, the IRA was hardly dependent on US support at at all - funding tended to peak whenever news hit of the British doing something dastardly, but it was sporadic. In fact, the non-sectarian Irish charties such as the Irish American Fund - which itself had only a marginal interest in the troubles - amassed vast amounts more in the way of donations than Irish republican fundraisers did. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline ... erica.html

It must also be bourne in mind that the US administrations over the years has generally been pretty sniffy about the Irish republican movement, despite what one may think of Gerry Adams getting his chance to strut around the White House (and who is in something of an otherwise unrelated pickle at the moment, as allegations have now come forth that he might have turned a 'convenient' blind-eye to his brother's paedophile activities). The Original IRA was outright Marxist; and at the height of the cold war, such origins as pertaining to the Provisional IRA - along with its links to Libya - would have been noted by the US intelligence agencies. Bear in mind also that the US Dept of Justice won a court case in 1981 forcing NORAID to register the Provos as its 'foreign principle': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NORAID

Certainly, from the looks of things, it was only a small minority of Irish Americans (or at least a minority of Americans claiming some interest in Ireland) who contributed to these relatively small funds. Personally speaking, from nigh-on two decades of talking to USanians on the net, I've yet to have chat with an Irish American who isn't by and large indifferent to Irish/UK relations. And some, of course, have been quite outspoken in condemning the IRA (two prominent examples being PJ O'Rourke and the writer/broadcaster Joe Queenan).

Despite the oft repeated claim, then, that Americans funded the IRA, it's probably more the case is that only a very, very small minority of Americans contributed funds to the provos - funds which weren't even all the necessary to the IRA, either. It should also be noted that other Irish-concerned groups in Australia and yes, mainland Britain (where around 25% of the populace have Irish ancestry), are likely to have made some contributions too. So it's certainly unfair to single out Americans - and in particular Irish Americans - as having so much blood and their hands, when it clearly isn't the case.

Notwithstanding the fact that we also ought to wonder where the Loyalist terror groups got their funding from, and how deep the oft-purported collusion between such groups and the British military/intelligence services actually went...

Remick
.
.
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:47 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17928

Post by Remick »

Tigzy wrote:
Remick wrote:
Git wrote:
Ah, typical fucking Plastic Yank. Now at least, with the Boston bombs, you bastards finally realise what you were funding in my country for decades.

Honestly, go fuck yourself Git. The people who funded the IRA from America were Irish immigrants. Maybe if you actually let them have their independence the right way, they wouldn't have existed. But no, blame all Americans for what some Irish Americans chose to fund.

You seem to just be a bitter, pitiful man. /ignore
The people who funded the IRA from America were largely Americans of Irish ancestry, not immigrants. Amongst this you can count a few dimwits who thought they were Irish because they mistook their Scottish surname for an Irish one, as well as no doubt a few 'Redcoats Out!' chickenhawk dildoes, along with some well-meaning individuals who took Clan na Gael and NORAID's 'widows and childrens' spiel at face value.

However, before this comes across as sounding like a rant against Irish Americans - it should be noted that the provisional IRA's biggest supplier in terms of money, arms and training was Libya. In fact, the IRA was hardly dependent on US support at at all - funding tended to peak whenever news hit of the British doing something dastardly, but it was sporadic. In fact, the non-sectarian Irish charties such as the Irish American Fund - which itself had only a marginal interest in the troubles - amassed vast amounts more in the way of donations than Irish republican fundraisers did. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline ... erica.html

It must also be bourne in mind that the US administrations over the years has generally been pretty sniffy about the Irish republican movement, despite what one may think of Gerry Adams getting his chance to strut around the White House (and who is in something of an otherwise unrelated pickle at the moment, as allegations have now come forth that he might have turned a 'convenient' blind-eye to his brother's paedophile activities). The Original IRA was outright Marxist; and at the height of the cold war, such origins as pertaining to the Provisional IRA - along with its links to Libya - would have been noted by the US intelligence agencies. Bear in mind also that the US Dept of Justice won a court case in 1981 forcing NORAID to register the Provos as its 'foreign principle': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NORAID

Certainly, from the looks of things, it was only a small minority of Irish Americans (or at least a minority of Americans claiming some interest in Ireland) who contributed to these relatively small funds. Personally speaking, from nigh-on two decades of talking to USanians on the net, I've yet to have chat with an Irish American who isn't by and large indifferent to Irish/UK relations. And some, of course, have been quite outspoken in condemning the IRA (two prominent examples being PJ O'Rourke and the writer/broadcaster Joe Queenan).

Despite the oft repeated claim, then, that Americans funded the IRA, it's probably more the case is that only a very, very small minority of Americans contributed funds to the provos - funds which weren't even all the necessary to the IRA, either. It should also be noted that other Irish-concerned groups in Australia and yes, mainland Britain (where around 25% of the populace have Irish ancestry), are likely to have made some contributions too. So it's certainly unfair to single out Americans - and in particular Irish Americans - as having so much blood and their hands, when it clearly isn't the case.

Notwithstanding the fact that we also ought to wonder where the Loyalist terror groups got their funding from, and how deep the oft-purported collusion between such groups and the British military/intelligence services actually went...
I probably forgot to include that I wasn't blaming Irish Americans for anything, merely pointing out that it would be a tiny minority of Americans that gave any money to the IRA, I should have clarified a minority of a minority. Git seemed to imply that that means they(who the fuck are they anyway?) deserved what happened at the marathon. Git is just a fucking moron, but he wound me up with that shit.

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17929

Post by Pitchguest »

Percentage wrote:Pitchguest, Peezus has linked to I Blame the Patriarchy on his sidebar since FtB began. He actually is a legit Twisty fan.
Then I stand corrected. He's insane.
Altair wrote:I don't know how reddit works, but from what I've seen, Tumblr's format doesn't lend itself to conversation and debate, so maybe SJW's are retreating to grounds where they won't be constantly asked for evidence and citations.
I'd say this is pretty much spot on.

Reddit's got its fair share of douchebags (as does virtually every network, though Reddit seems to get more than most), but it does occasionally shave away the bullshit. For example, when the girl who said she was going to shave her head in solidarity for a cancer charity she was raising money for happened on Reddit, and asked fellow Redditors to chip in, they were at least consistent in their criticism. Tumblr would have let that shit slip.

(For a bit of backstory, she was spamming various subreddits with the same request and the same info, and then started deleting threads when people noticed she had spammed the same thing on other subreddits, for which they got suspicious and accused her of being a fraud - and to be fair, why wouldn't they? I would too. As it turned out, though, she was legit, but come on. Adrien Chen later commited an "experiment" where he was going to prove Reddit was sexist, by pretending to be a cancer survivor and raising money, although not spamming other subreddits and deleting threads thus making the "experiment" totally pointless. Predictably people who had donated to his faux drive got very upset. Who knew? :confusion-shrug:)

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17930

Post by Pitchguest »


Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17931

Post by Tigzy »

@Remick

I agree - suggesting that bombing innocent civilians as serving a kind of justice-by-proxy is pretty horrible, and no more 'rams the point home' than it does for a Northern Irish protestant being revenge-killed by a Republican gunman, or an NI republican/Catholic being killed for the same reason by a member of the UDA.

Ericb
.
.
Posts: 881
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:20 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17932

Post by Ericb »

Tigzy wrote:@Remick

I agree - suggesting that bombing innocent civilians as serving a kind of justice-by-proxy is pretty horrible, and no more 'rams the point home' than it does for a Northern Irish protestant being revenge-killed by a Republican gunman, or an NI republican/Catholic being killed for the same reason by a member of the UDA.

The whole idea of collective culpability for individual acts is pretty reprehensible (it's also the bread and butter of SJWs).

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17933

Post by cunt »

America! Fuck Yeah! Ultimate defender of free speech rights in the broadcast medi-a!*

*Your free speech must be generally be in line with the views of General Electric, Viacom, News Corporation, Disney, Time Warner or CBS.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17934

Post by Steersman »

Michael K Gray wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I will note the Pit is slowing down a bit these days, in terms of comments. As with creationist-bashing forums, I will take it as a good sign. Maybe there's a bit less crazy flying around right now?
Indeed.
Our fledgling crusade against hypocrisy seems to be spreading its memes.
It is having a global effect.
It is enabling folk such as Russel Blackford, et alia, to have cause to regret their former silence against popular tribal cultism, and come to the point where they now loudly voice it.
Just to clarify: are you saying Blackford is now supporting "tribal cultism" or voicing some criticisms of it? I would think the latter, but your phrasing suggests the former.

But I tend to agree with you about "our fledgling crusade" - "may our tribe increase". I think Elam's recent retraction and even PZ's acknowledgement of some problematic dimensions of feminism are cases in point. Although I think there's still work for the "bretheren" (and sistereth-en) to do to spread the word - I'll say our work is almost done - one chapter of it, anyway - when Ophelia Benson concedes that connecting "virulent" with "feminism" doesn't always qualify as misogyny ....

Remick
.
.
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:47 pm

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17935

Post by Remick »

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... uce-crime/

PZ has a terrible post up, using images of the police in boston this last week about how we make our solution "men with guns waiting for criminals to do wrong so we can blow them away". Its mind boggling.

Should the police not use armor when pursuing suspects of a bombing??? Also, I don't know how often the police anywhere in the US commonly "blow people away". What a joke, I guess he is onto this "toxic masculinity" thing applying to police work.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17936

Post by Steersman »

Submariner wrote:So tell me is this commenter Steersman or just his clone:


Well sir, maybe I give folks that make such remarks too much credit. But the people that I hear making that kind of claim are typically straight, so they're not speaking from experience. And given the individual factors that go into "winning a mate" (or a one-night stand) include things like confidence, physical attractiveness, "status," and the like--the "playing field" is already for from being "even," and therefore a less than apt laboratory for testing such a hypothesis. So, not "really."
Yesterday: Nugent's blogs; today: The Pit; tomorrow: The World! ;-)

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17937

Post by cunt »

Remick wrote:http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... uce-crime/

PZ has a terrible post up, using images of the police in boston this last week about how we make our solution "men with guns waiting for criminals to do wrong so we can blow them away". Its mind boggling.

Should the police not use armor when pursuing suspects of a bombing??? Also, I don't know how often the police anywhere in the US commonly "blow people away". What a joke, I guess he is onto this "toxic masculinity" thing applying to police work.
I don't even know what to say to that article. Mind boggling is right.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17938

Post by Southern »

Oh, boo-hoo, the fat bearded sissy who likes to denounce gelatto shop owners but has yet to pick up a battle against Lil'Wayne and other rappers over sexism thinks the police work against a guy who planted bombs in a city is too harsh, too "manly".

Please, PZ, do tell me: at the top of your authority as a tentacle-rape manga specialist, what do you think the police should have done? Maybe thrown a squid over his head, your pansy sack of hypocrisy and cowardice?

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17939

Post by Tigzy »

Ophie has a post up giving Dawkins some shit because he phrased something poorly on Twitter.
But never mind that. There’s a bigger thing here. “Unfortunately, I phrased it poorly.” Does that remind you of anything?

It reminds me of something. “Dear Muslima.” “Zero bad.” Unfortunately, he phrased those badly too.

Why can he admit bad phrasing in the one case and not in the other?
#stupidbitch

http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... #more-7784

Submariner
.
.
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:05 pm
Location: Florida, US of A
Contact:

Re: Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It

#17940

Post by Submariner »

Tigzy wrote:Ophie has a post up giving Dawkins some shit because he phrased something poorly on Twitter.
But never mind that. There’s a bigger thing here. “Unfortunately, I phrased it poorly.” Does that remind you of anything?

It reminds me of something. “Dear Muslima.” “Zero bad.” Unfortunately, he phrased those badly too.

Why can he admit bad phrasing in the one case and not in the other?
#stupidbitch

http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... #more-7784
I thought Dawkins' phrasing was superb in "Dear Muslima" :whistle:

Locked