PeeZusdammit your avatar made me drop a handful of cashews!!Gumby wrote:PZ being demonizing and hyperbolic with someone he disagrees with? Shocking indeed!Dick Strawkins wrote: Finally Peezus.
What.The.Fuck.
Honestly, when talking about Ron Lindsay's speech he sounded all the world line Rush Limbaugh complaining about communists, except he switched it for misogynists or MRAs.
He actually described Lindsays talk as "an MRA booster speech"!
:shock:
Glad I could help!BarnOwl wrote:PeeZusdammit your avatar made me drop a handful of cashews!!Gumby wrote:PZ being demonizing and hyperbolic with someone he disagrees with? Shocking indeed!Dick Strawkins wrote: Finally Peezus.
What.The.Fuck.
Honestly, when talking about Ron Lindsay's speech he sounded all the world line Rush Limbaugh complaining about communists, except he switched it for misogynists or MRAs.
He actually described Lindsays talk as "an MRA booster speech"!
:shock:
:lol:
justinvacula wrote:The hair connecting the goatee to the moustache doesn't grow :\Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Justin, new look advice:
http://i391.photobucket.com/albums/oo35 ... 49573c.jpg[/URL]
On MIchael Nugent's attempted compromise Nick "High Contrast Junk Mouth" Gotts ays commenters are the "usual MRA crowd doing their usual lies". Because, you know, all criticisms are by "anti-feminists". And Coleman Tutte looks like the only person to actually die on a Google Hangout.justinvacula wrote:New 1 hour 20 minute Google Hangout with ratings, comments, and stats disabled
...with PZ Myers, Coleman Tuttle (?) [whose microphone is shit and keeps interrupting], Jade Hawk, and some others
[youtube]3As4-wow2wc[/youtube]
I haven't finished watching yet...finishing listening to Chill Girls with Reap and Mykeru...
Only a master of baiting, Garth.Git wrote:At last, The circle is now complete. When I left you, I was but the learner; now *I* am the master.Tony Parsehole wrote:A deceased porcupine or a bottle that is broken is most effective...Git wrote:How shall I fuck myself sanctimoniously, oh Lord?Tony Parsehole wrote:Go fuck yourself you sanctimonious cunt.Git wrote:Enough with the slagging off of Greta for this please.
Slag the fuck out of her for her behaviour, she deserves it for that, but not for her appearance.
It is known.
Its all Seaman Staines' fault, m'lud.bovarchist wrote:Only a master of baiting, Garth.Git wrote:At last, The circle is now complete. When I left you, I was but the learner; now *I* am the master.Tony Parsehole wrote:A deceased porcupine or a bottle that is broken is most effective...Git wrote:How shall I fuck myself sanctimoniously, oh Lord?Tony Parsehole wrote: Go fuck yourself you sanctimonious cunt.
It is known.
Just forcing myself to watch - that Nick Gotts guy looks like a fricking zombie!Mykeru wrote:On MIchael Nugent's attempted compromise Nick "High Contrast Junk Mouth" Gotts ays commenters are the "usual MRA crowd doing their usual lies". Because, you know, all criticisms are by "anti-feminists". And Coleman Tutte looks like the only person to actually die on a Google Hangout.justinvacula wrote:New 1 hour 20 minute Google Hangout with ratings, comments, and stats disabled
...with PZ Myers, Coleman Tuttle (?) [whose microphone is shit and keeps interrupting], Jade Hawk, and some others
[fooltube]3As4-wow2wc[/fooltube]
I haven't finished watching yet...finishing listening to Chill Girls with Reap and Mykeru...
Video gold, already downloaded with YT Video Downloader Pro.
Myers is easy. He is a intellectual coward. He is also a physical coward, so as in the case of Felix Baumgartner and veterans in general he takes things that actually require courage and disparages it.ERV wrote:
Also, whats up with Myers not wanting to see the human side of the storm? A scientist calling a rare opportunity to observe something 'boring' is... odd.
Skeeve wrote:Would it be too much to ask to get rid of the goatse, please?
I prefer to define him as an intellectual fraud, and a psychological coward.Myers is easy. He is a intellectual coward.
And here was I thinking it was a public service announcement to get our prostate's checked.Skeeve wrote:Would it be too much to ask to get rid of the goatse, please?
I said "what goatse?". Then I had to skip back a page and a half to spot it.Skeeve wrote:Would it be too much to ask to get rid of the goatse, please?
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:justinvacula wrote:The hair connecting the goatee to the moustache doesn't grow :\Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Justin, new look advice:
http://i391.photobucket.com/albums/oo35 ... 49573c.jpg[/URL]
Mine neither. I just lest the mustache grow a bit (with careful trimming) and use the extra hair-lenght to do the trick. It works, really.
Yes, you will have better results if you quit being a cheap, whiny little fucker, kill your piggy bank and fork over the cash for the Blu Cig starter kit.TheMudbrooker wrote:I decided to give ecigs a try, so I bought a cheap disposable one today just to see if they might be worthwhile. It seems to deliver a good level of nicotine but on exhalation it gives a taste not unlike that of low-grade bathtub meth and antifreeze. Do the higher priced models taste better or is the flavor an unavoidable result of vaporizing propylene glycol?
Skeeve wrote:Would it be too much to ask to get rid of the goatse, please?
I think preventing people from posting things like this in the opennippletwister wrote:Skeeve wrote:Would it be too much to ask to get rid of the goatse, please?
The "spoiler" thing did have it's uses....
Sez the cartoon ejaculating glans penis?ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Gumby's new avatar: amazing!!
Posting gore pics like goatse and the testicle thing: childish and tiresome. You're going to make some people feel a bit violated, while everyone else is left with "meh, it's not the ync.com".
To avoid censorship, can we have the spoiler tab back?
TheMudbrooker wrote:I decided to give ecigs a try, so I bought a cheap disposable one today just to see if they might be worthwhile. It seems to deliver a good level of nicotine but on exhalation it gives a taste not unlike that of low-grade bathtub meth and antifreeze. Do the higher priced models taste better or is the flavor an unavoidable result of vaporizing propylene glycol?
I'd recommend either an eGo battery - or, if you're a rich bastard, a variable voltage model, such as the Provari. For the tank, options include the Vivi Nova or Kangor Protank. There's really a fuckton of options, though. Here's some info: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/ ... ation.htmlMykeru wrote:Yes, you will have better results if you quit being a cheap, whiny little fucker, kill your piggy bank and fork over the cash for the Blu Cig starter kit.
BarnOwl wrote:Watching now.Whig wrote:Baboons are having a hangout.
::coughcough hoarder house cough::
Thanks :) Once in a while I can do a semi-decent face transplant. Of course, it helps that the pic is shrunk down to avatar size.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Gumby's new avatar: amazing!!
I figure that that is probably a dig at, some mockery – misplaced and wide of the mark as they apparently don't understand analogies – of Justin’s somewhat inadvertent analogy between FfTB/Skepchick/Atheism+ feminist/sjw dogma and Islam. Which is, I think, actually quite a good one – somewhat along the same line as Paula Kirby’s photoshop last August.Tony Parsehole wrote:Russell Glasser, Ophelia Benson and PZ myers are planning world conquest....If I laughed harder I would leak shit from my nostrils.
I do not have that problem. This guy looks like my younger (and not as good looking) version of myself with a slightly longer but not as thick beard.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:justinvacula wrote:The hair connecting the goatee to the moustache doesn't grow :\Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Justin, new look advice:
http://i391.photobucket.com/albums/oo35 ... 49573c.jpg[/URL]
Mine neither. I just lest the mustache grow a bit (with careful trimming) and use the extra hair-lenght to do the trick. It works, really.
That shop was inspired.Steersman wrote:[...]Which is, I think, actually quite a good one – somewhat along the same line as Paula Kirby’s photoshop last August.
Well seeing as you're here now, you may as well carry on posting. But if you ever need a drink, just make sure you use the correct water fountain.AndrewV69 wrote:I do not have that problem. This guy looks like my younger (and not as good looking) version of myself with a slightly longer but not as thick beard.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:justinvacula wrote:The hair connecting the goatee to the moustache doesn't grow :\Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Justin, new look advice:
http://i391.photobucket.com/albums/oo35 ... 49573c.jpg[/URL]
Mine neither. I just lest the mustache grow a bit (with careful trimming) and use the extra hair-lenght to do the trick. It works, really.
Yes I do indeed look like Hassan Nasrallah so I guess I am doxing myself. It should also come as no surprise that in the past Egyptians and Iranians have just come up to me and start talking in Arabic or Persian. When I was clean shaven I have also had Kashmiri Indians approach (they assume I am a Dardic).
Was the question ever answered as to why Becky Whatnot was so poorly done, while the rest of the image was pretty competently 'shopped?Gumby wrote:That shop was inspired.Steersman wrote:[...]Which is, I think, actually quite a good one – somewhat along the same line as Paula Kirby’s photoshop last August.
I don't know. but I do know that putting together a muiltple-layer shop like that takes time and patience. Maybe Becky was done near the end of the project and Paula simply did more of a rush job with her. And faces can be an absolute bitch to work with. It's hard to stick a face or head in and make it come out looking perfectly seamless.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Was the question ever answered as to why Becky Whatnot was so poorly done, while the rest of the image was pretty competently 'shopped?Gumby wrote:That shop was inspired.Steersman wrote:[...]Which is, I think, actually quite a good one – somewhat along the same line as Paula Kirby’s photoshop last August.
Was it an artistic point or sloppiness?
Considering Kirby worked in the "restored" Ecce Homo, I think the crudeness of it was part of the humor against people who artlessly injected themselves into the sainted community. If I think of it being done with the faces properly scaled and feathered, it's not nearly as funny as the "plastered on" look.Gumby wrote:I don't know. but I do know that putting together a muiltple-layer shop like that takes time and patience. Maybe Becky was done near the end of the project and Paula simply did more of a rush job with her. And faces can be an absolute bitch to work with. It's hard to stick a face or head in and make it come out looking perfectly seamless.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Was the question ever answered as to why Becky Whatnot was so poorly done, while the rest of the image was pretty competently 'shopped?Gumby wrote:That shop was inspired.Steersman wrote:[...]Which is, I think, actually quite a good one – somewhat along the same line as Paula Kirby’s photoshop last August.
Was it an artistic point or sloppiness?
Regardless, it's a great example of a good concept executed well. The only people who didn't understand it were the baboons :lol:
With a racist hat even. None of those images bother me in the slightest. But then I used to eat my lunch while sitting at the dissecting table.Mykeru wrote:Sez the cartoon ejaculating glans penis?ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Gumby's new avatar: amazing!!
Posting gore pics like goatse and the testicle thing: childish and tiresome. You're going to make some people feel a bit violated, while everyone else is left with "meh, it's not the ync.com".
To avoid censorship, can we have the spoiler tab back?
Oh, and PeeZus has really cunty eyes.Lsuoma wrote:Grollikins! That hangout was boring. Unbelievably tedious...
Have a shot each time Opheliar tries to get herself onto the main image by grunting, muttering and saying "yes, I know, I saw that, yes" when one of the men makes a useful point about atheism or feminism. The whole thing will speed by.Lsuoma wrote:Grollikins! That hangout was boring. Unbelievably tedious...
Wait, what?ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Have a shot each time Opheliar tries to get herself onto the main image by grunting, muttering and saying "yes, I know, I saw that, yes" when one of the men makes a useful point about atheism or feminism. The whole thing will speed by.Lsuoma wrote:Grollikins! That hangout was boring. Unbelievably tedious...
I'm unsure as to why people say I made an analogy in my post. I didn't (or didn't intend to). The jist of the post is this: How can one be consistent in supporting "Draw Mohammad Day" yet rebuke satire of feminists? We know that Draw Mohammad Day/cartoons of Mohammad may lead to violence and, at the very least, will lead to someone claiming offense. Satire of feminists...well, what is the complaint? If it is 'hurt feelings' then you can't support drawing Mohammad knowing that hurt feelings (and even violence) will be the result of Mohammad cartoons.Steersman wrote:I figure that that is probably a dig at, some mockery – misplaced and wide of the mark as they apparently don't understand analogies – of Justin’s somewhat inadvertent analogy between FfTB/Skepchick/Atheism+ feminist/sjw dogma and Islam. Which is, I think, actually quite a good one – somewhat along the same line as Paula Kirby’s photoshop last August.Tony Parsehole wrote:Russell Glasser, Ophelia Benson and PZ myers are planning world conquest....If I laughed harder I would leak shit from my nostrils.
Well great, you've worked in a dissecting lab. You've seen nasty shit and don't feel anything other than curiosity in images of an extra-scrotal testicle or a goatse. Many people will feel violated and have lasting damage from scrolling down a page and seeing these. I hope this isn't the kind of place where posting gore images and videos is seen as amusing or effective.AndrewV69 wrote:With a racist hat even. None of those images bother me in the slightest. But then I used to eat my lunch while sitting at the dissecting table.Mykeru wrote:Sez the cartoon ejaculating glans penis?ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Gumby's new avatar: amazing!!
Posting gore pics like goatse and the testicle thing: childish and tiresome. You're going to make some people feel a bit violated, while everyone else is left with "meh, it's not the ync.com".
To avoid censorship, can we have the spoiler tab back?
One other thing ... is anyone here seriously disturbed at seeing Greta naked? It is not as if it is a private image, and though she is not to my taste, what possible objection could there be?
she didn't win because it was a poll to get through to each round and she got it pharyngulated it every time. blagging overseas votes for a USA competition? "how to cheat your way to a radio show competition final" isn't how i would say it but im not saying it am i?Outwest wrote:Reap wrote:That's cause it sucked. I listened to the entire thing. It sounded like an 11 year old wrote the script and she is just annoying to listen to no matter what she is saying. If she came to my door and announced I'd won the publishers clearing house sweepstakes I'd still tell her to shut the fuck up cause she is annoying me. ...Outwest wrote:I was just reading RW's Wkipedia page, for no specific reason and I found this. The last sentence is priceless:
The Public Radio Talent Quest
In May 2007, Watson entered The Public Radio Talent Quest, a contest aimed to find new public radio hosts.[10] The contest claims to have received more than 1,400 entries.[11] Watson's entries won the popular vote in every round,[12] and she was declared one of three winners who each would receive $10,000 to produce a public radio pilot.[13]
Watson's pilot, Curiosity, Aroused,[14] was an hour-long program focused on science and skepticism.[13] It featured interviews with Richard Saunders of Australian Skeptics and Mystery Investigators, and Richard Wiseman, author of Quirkology and Professor of the Public Understanding of Psychology at the University of Hertfordshire. She also investigated claims of poisonous amounts of lead in lipstick, went on a ghost tour in Boston and visited a Psychic Fair.
Her show was the only one among the three winners not to receive funding by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting for being turned into a one-year show.
Well, since most prople write there own Wikipedia pages (or so I'm told), I'm surprised the sentence didnt end, "...for being turned into a one-year show.BECAUSE OF THE PATRIARCHY!"
As I indicated in some detail in a comment on your blog post, I think that the implicit analogy is:justinvacula wrote:I'm unsure as to why people say I made an analogy in my post. I didn't (or didn't intend to). The jist of the post is this: How can one be consistent in supporting "Draw Mohammad Day" yet rebuke satire of feminists? We know that Draw Mohammad Day/cartoons of Mohammad may lead to violence and, at the very least, will lead to someone claiming offense. Satire of feminists...well, what is the complaint? If it is 'hurt feelings' then you can't support drawing Mohammad knowing that hurt feelings (and even violence) will be the result of Mohammad cartoons.Steersman wrote:I figure that that is probably a dig at, some mockery – misplaced and wide of the mark as they apparently don't understand analogies – of Justin’s somewhat inadvertent analogy between FfTB/Skepchick/Atheism+ feminist/sjw dogma and Islam. Which is, I think, actually quite a good one – somewhat along the same line as Paula Kirby’s photoshop last August.Tony Parsehole wrote:Russell Glasser, Ophelia Benson and PZ myers are planning world conquest....If I laughed harder I would leak shit from my nostrils.
Which is, I think, what undergirds your quite credible argument that they are being hypocritical in supporting the former while having an attack of the vapours over the suggestion that their dogmas are fair-game for being similarly targeted with satire. That is, that that particular sauce is fine for the Islamic gander, but they’ll be damned if anyone tries to use it to garnish the feminist goose.Islamic dogma is to Draw-Mohammad-Day as Feminist dogma is to “draw its modern-day ‘prophets’ in ridiculous posesâ€.
Look, sugar-tits. It happens. It's not a trend. It's not a harbinger of things to come. It doesn't mean you have to be buried outside the city walls when you die of acute butt-hurt.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Well great, you've worked in a dissecting lab. You've seen nasty shit and don't feel anything other than curiosity in images of an extra-scrotal testicle or a goatse. Many people will feel violated and have lasting damage from scrolling down a page and seeing these. I hope this isn't the kind of place where posting gore images and videos is seen as amusing or effective.AndrewV69 wrote:With a racist hat even. None of those images bother me in the slightest. But then I used to eat my lunch while sitting at the dissecting table.Mykeru wrote:Sez the cartoon ejaculating glans penis?ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Gumby's new avatar: amazing!!
Posting gore pics like goatse and the testicle thing: childish and tiresome. You're going to make some people feel a bit violated, while everyone else is left with "meh, it's not the ync.com".
To avoid censorship, can we have the spoiler tab back?
One other thing ... is anyone here seriously disturbed at seeing Greta naked? It is not as if it is a private image, and though she is not to my taste, what possible objection could there be?
If you want to show yor disdain for social conventions, and demonstrate your belief that just because you have seen broken bodies, so everyone else should be fine with them, go and post your stuff on nickelodeon.com. Why not, right? Because you have eaten your lunch at a dissection table, so fuck those kiddies and their sensibilities.
WTF! time/link please?free thoughtpolice wrote:I managed to listen to the entire FTB hangout.
...
Near the end of the hangout Myers tells a rape joke.
I expect his commenters will call him out on it any time now.
Thanks for the links on these! I have a blu-100 and have been wanting to branch out but keep using the blu battery/charger box. It would be nice to find other flavors that use the same cartridges, even better if I can refill them. E-cigs are alright for me, I think I might be craving one of the other however-many chemicals within cigs though. Hopefully different cartridges will have better effects than the blu cartridges.Metalogic42 wrote:TheMudbrooker wrote:I decided to give ecigs a try, so I bought a cheap disposable one today just to see if they might be worthwhile. It seems to deliver a good level of nicotine but on exhalation it gives a taste not unlike that of low-grade bathtub meth and antifreeze. Do the higher priced models taste better or is the flavor an unavoidable result of vaporizing propylene glycol?I'd recommend either an eGo battery - or, if you're a rich bastard, a variable voltage model, such as the Provari. For the tank, options include the Vivi Nova or Kangor Protank. There's really a fuckton of options, though. Here's some info: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/ ... ation.htmlMykeru wrote:Yes, you will have better results if you quit being a cheap, whiny little fucker, kill your piggy bank and fork over the cash for the Blu Cig starter kit.
Be careful though, because I've noticed that getting into e-cigs has turned me into a bit of a hobbyist, which is costing me a little money (my vivi nova tank has been...slightly modified). Also, if you don't like the propylene glycol, they also have kinds that use vegetable glycerin, which is what I use (you can also mix them, which many people do).
X situation is *like* Y situation...justinvacula wrote:I'm unsure as to why people say I made an analogy in my post. I didn't (or didn't intend to). The jist of the post is this: How can one be consistent in supporting "Draw Mohammad Day" yet rebuke satire of feminists? We know that Draw Mohammad Day/cartoons of Mohammad may lead to violence and, at the very least, will lead to someone claiming offense. Satire of feminists...well, what is the complaint? If it is 'hurt feelings' then you can't support drawing Mohammad knowing that hurt feelings (and even violence) will be the result of Mohammad cartoons.Steersman wrote:I figure that that is probably a dig at, some mockery – misplaced and wide of the mark as they apparently don't understand analogies – of Justin’s somewhat inadvertent analogy between FfTB/Skepchick/Atheism+ feminist/sjw dogma and Islam. Which is, I think, actually quite a good one – somewhat along the same line as Paula Kirby’s photoshop last August.Tony Parsehole wrote:Russell Glasser, Ophelia Benson and PZ myers are planning world conquest....If I laughed harder I would leak shit from my nostrils.
Yeah, taking the time to write a novella which uses some nice humor and imagery to stand in place of an argument is your thing, that's fine (though in this case I don't think you took enough time planning character development and plot cohesiveness. Please take that onboard as constructive criticism.).Mykeru wrote:Look, sugar-tits. It happens. It's not a trend. It's not a harbinger of things to come. It doesn't mean you have to be buried outside the city walls when you die of acute butt-hurt.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Well great, you've worked in a dissecting lab. You've seen nasty shit and don't feel anything other than curiosity in images of an extra-scrotal testicle or a goatse. Many people will feel violated and have lasting damage from scrolling down a page and seeing these. I hope this isn't the kind of place where posting gore images and videos is seen as amusing or effective.AndrewV69 wrote:With a racist hat even. None of those images bother me in the slightest. But then I used to eat my lunch while sitting at the dissecting table.Mykeru wrote:Sez the cartoon ejaculating glans penis?ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Gumby's new avatar: amazing!!
Posting gore pics like goatse and the testicle thing: childish and tiresome. You're going to make some people feel a bit violated, while everyone else is left with "meh, it's not the ync.com".
To avoid censorship, can we have the spoiler tab back?
One other thing ... is anyone here seriously disturbed at seeing Greta naked? It is not as if it is a private image, and though she is not to my taste, what possible objection could there be?
If you want to show yor disdain for social conventions, and demonstrate your belief that just because you have seen broken bodies, so everyone else should be fine with them, go and post your stuff on nickelodeon.com. Why not, right? Because you have eaten your lunch at a dissection table, so fuck those kiddies and their sensibilities.
Sometimes people, to make a point or, in my case, to one-up someone just for the mean-spirited juvenile hell of it, will post stuff that pushes the envelope just a little bit. You won't like it. It will make you feel all icky inside. It may make you beat off to it and then, as a sort of obvious reaction-formation, get on here and complain about it a lot.
But let me assure you. You will go to sleep tonight and tomorrow, when you wake up the sun will be shining, the birds singing and it will all be like a bad dream. Then the people you work with on the farm will come into the room and you'll tell them they were in your dream spreading their ass cheeks and it's good to be home.
Then you will log back in and keep scrolling until you find the stuff that pissed you off in the first place and a signal will go out through the either and, without you even knowing it, the Vatican will fast track you for canonization because you are such a fucking martyr.
Oh my goodness. The DRAMA!
Spoiler tags (if the security issues have been fixed) could benefit those in need of them methinks.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: Anyway, I think the summary would be this: offensiveness - sexual, anatomical, linguistic - is a spectrum. I've declared my position on the first two here (as for the third, I have no limits), and that is all I can or want to do. It's up to the other Pitizens to decide where they stand and whether it's important enough to them to make comment on it either way.
so you looked like this when you were young?AndrewV69 wrote:
I do not have that problem. This guy looks like my younger (and not as good looking) version of myself with a slightly longer but not as thick beard.
Yes I do indeed look like Hassan Nasrallah ...
1st bold: How is this an 'adult website'?sacha wrote:since this is an adult website, nickelodeon.com, and a sex education class for 11 year olds is hyperbole, dahling.
as far as I'm concerned, the images are meh - the image of a person vomiting makes me a bit nauseous, but I don't ask anyone to refrain from posting it, I just scroll by. The naked image of ReGreta's superimposed onto Mykeru's face made me cringe a lot more than the goatse and the testicle.
the point is, different things bother different people.
DownThunder wrote:
Interesting, what is/was your take on Typhonblue? Keep in mind I'm not really "in" that scene so if something happened with TB or WBB, I wouldn't know.
I've had a full beard for most of the last 35 + years. Never had the problem with the bare spots. Can't stand longer longer lengths around my mouth - chew on 'em too much. Now I just have the more salt than pepper- and fighting the Saschas of the world off - problems. (Damn shame there are not more of them. Sigh...)Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:justinvacula wrote:The hair connecting the goatee to the moustache doesn't grow :\Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Justin, new look advice:
http://i391.photobucket.com/albums/oo35 ... 49573c.jpg[/URL]
Mine neither. I just lest the mustache grow a bit (with careful trimming) and use the extra hair-lenght to do the trick. It works, really.
Around 1:09 they have a chuckle about cleaning up after rape, it might be a stretch to call it a joke, nevertheless seems it would be considered offensive if uttered by non feminists.Parody Accountant wrote:WTF! time/link please?free thoughtpolice wrote:I managed to listen to the entire FTB hangout.
...
Near the end of the hangout Myers tells a rape joke.
I expect his commenters will call him out on it any time now.
Bill the Cat wrote:I've had a full beard for most of the last 35 + years. Never had the problem with the bare spots. Can't stand longer longer lengths around my mouth - chew on 'em too much. Now I just have the more salt than pepper- and fighting the Saschas of the world off - problems. (Damn shame there are not more of them. Sigh...)Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:justinvacula wrote:The hair connecting the goatee to the moustache doesn't grow :\Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Justin, new look advice:
http://i391.photobucket.com/albums/oo35 ... 49573c.jpg[/URL]
Mine neither. I just lest the mustache grow a bit (with careful trimming) and use the extra hair-lenght to do the trick. It works, really.
