bovarchist wrote:If that's a Transformer, we're all doomed.Mykeru wrote:
Hate to say it,
[img]CH20's%20butt-crack%20cleaner[/img]
But both you guys are a bunch of massive pussies.
Anyway, there was a security camera out there. And the pictures, while poor and grainy, give some credence to the eyewitness testimony and complaint.Django Unchained' Actress -- We Got the Pictures ... And It Looks Like Sex
An eyewitness who saw Daniele and Brian as he worked in a nearby office tells TMZ ... Brian was sitting in the passenger seat with his feet on the curb and Daniele was straddling him with her shirt pulled up -- breasts exposed. The eyewitness says she was grinding on top of him, rocking back and forth.
Someone from the office went down and asked Daniele and Brian to stop because everyone in the office could see them but they continued.
The eyewitnesses say Brian then began "horizontally bongoing her boobs back and forth." He says she eventually reached into the center console, grabbed a tissue, wiped him down and then herself and tossed it on the grass.
...
That's Bagger 288, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagger_288bovarchist wrote:If that's a Transformer, we're all doomed.Mykeru wrote:
Hate to say it,
http://cdn2.listsoplenty.com/listsoplen ... hine-1.jpg
But both you guys are a bunch of massive pussies.
jugheadnaut wrote:It is a good article. JacquesCuze actually posted it yesterday as part of his fake Steersman tweet as a way of saying it was better than his own CHS post.Tribble wrote:Great rebuttle of Herr Meirs attack on Games & Sommers. Not directly at Meyers, but it just shits on his, and those of his ilk, BS:
I had assumed it was the bad guy in the new Saw movie.bovarchist wrote:If that's a Transformer, we're all doomed.Mykeru wrote:
Hate to say it,
http://cdn2.listsoplenty.com/listsoplen ... hine-1.jpg
But both you guys are a bunch of massive pussies.
Funny, EU countries were falling over themselves to support South Sudanese independence (and still are, even though they promptly started killing each other), but now that it hits closer to home they suddenly remember there are downsides to separatism. Maybe they should set up a "state-building strategy" for Scotland?Lsuoma wrote:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... rophe.htmlLsuoma wrote:The approval from existing members needs to be unanimous, and Spain has already hinted that they would veto, in order to prevent secessionist regions from getting uppity. Spain is still very much a land of provinces, and many people consider themselves, e.g., Basque, Catalan, Aragonian, Leonian more than Spanish.katamari Damassi wrote:If the Scots vote yes, then how long before they join the EU, or will they?
windy wrote:
Funny, EU countries were falling over themselves to support South Sudanese independence (and still are, even though they promptly started killing each other), but now that it hits closer to home they suddenly remember there are downsides to separatism. Maybe they should set up a "state-building strategy" for Scotland?
Wow. I don't know the background of the author, but I can tell you that the middle section on the relationship between video games and violence is exactly correct. Most of all, the author mentions the critical study that turned everything on its head: the study showing that neither games-causes-violence or violence-leads-to-gaming is the key; that the correlation is driven almost entirely by the third variable of (lousy) family dynamics.Tribble wrote:Great rebuttle of Herr Meirs attack on Games & Sommers. Not directly at Meyers, but it just shits on his, and those of his ilk, BS:
Ha! It's dry humping at the very least. But wait... I thought this kind of thing never happened in Studio City. ;)Tribble wrote:And now for something something funnier. Remember the fuss the black actress put up regarding the 'unfair complaints of her being a prostitute' and 'having sex in the street,' and it's 'racism that you think I'm a prostitute' story of her suffering 'unreasonable police abuse.'
'Anyway, there was a security camera out there. And the pictures, while poor and grainy, give some credence to the eyewitness testimony and complaint.Django Unchained' Actress -- We Got the Pictures ... And It Looks Like Sex
An eyewitness who saw Daniele and Brian as he worked in a nearby office tells TMZ ... Brian was sitting in the passenger seat with his feet on the curb and Daniele was straddling him with her shirt pulled up -- breasts exposed. The eyewitness says she was grinding on top of him, rocking back and forth.
Someone from the office went down and asked Daniele and Brian to stop because everyone in the office could see them but they continued.
The eyewitnesses say Brian then began "horizontally bongoing her boobs back and forth." He says she eventually reached into the center console, grabbed a tissue, wiped him down and then herself and tossed it on the grass.
...
http://www.tmz.com/2014/09/17/django-un ... es-photos/
If there is a just god, first, I'm sorry, dude, but you really needed to give me more to go on, and, second, please don't let the above be deleted.
"I was being raped, you bastards!" in 5 ... 4 ... 3 ... 2 ...jugheadnaut wrote:If I were her, I'd stay under the radar for a while. Between the pictures and the multiple eye witnesses, this has gone way beyond reasonable suspicion or even probable cause. If they charge her, it's likely to stick.
:lol: You're very good at seeing alternatives that I miss. ;)BlueShiftRhino wrote:"I was being raped, you bastards!" in 5 ... 4 ... 3 ... 2 ...jugheadnaut wrote:If I were her, I'd stay under the radar for a while. Between the pictures and the multiple eye witnesses, this has gone way beyond reasonable suspicion or even probable cause. If they charge her, it's likely to stick.
http://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/1750868_700b.jpgMykeru wrote:bovarchist wrote:If that's a Transformer, we're all doomed.Mykeru wrote:
Hate to say it,
CH20's%20butt-crack%20cleaner
But both you guys are a bunch of massive pussies.
Tried to find that cartoon drawing of the bicycle ass brush, but couldn't find it.
Well, I sit corrected. I'd stand but um, can't stand right now.jugheadnaut wrote:Ha! It's dry humping at the very least. But wait... I thought this kind of thing never happened in Studio City. ;)Tribble wrote:And now for something something funnier. Remember the fuss the black actress put up regarding the 'unfair complaints of her being a prostitute' and 'having sex in the street,' and it's 'racism that you think I'm a prostitute' story of her suffering 'unreasonable police abuse.'
'Anyway, there was a security camera out there. And the pictures, while poor and grainy, give some credence to the eyewitness testimony and complaint.Django Unchained' Actress -- We Got the Pictures ... And It Looks Like Sex
An eyewitness who saw Daniele and Brian as he worked in a nearby office tells TMZ ... Brian was sitting in the passenger seat with his feet on the curb and Daniele was straddling him with her shirt pulled up -- breasts exposed. The eyewitness says she was grinding on top of him, rocking back and forth.
Someone from the office went down and asked Daniele and Brian to stop because everyone in the office could see them but they continued.
The eyewitnesses say Brian then began "horizontally bongoing her boobs back and forth." He says she eventually reached into the center console, grabbed a tissue, wiped him down and then herself and tossed it on the grass.
...
http://www.tmz.com/2014/09/17/django-un ... es-photos/
If I were her, I'd stay under the radar for a while. Between the pictures and the multiple eye witnesses, this has gone way beyond reasonable suspicion or even probable cause. If they charge her, it's likely to stick.
I've got a suggested panel.
Compared to other MRA leaders I had followed, Warren Farrell, Glenn Sacks, etc., AVFM always seemsjet_lagg wrote:I've been watching a lot of Karen Straughan this week. Particularly interesting are her statements concerning A Voice For Men, as they don't seem to match at all with the sentiments I see around here. If it were someone I didn't respect, I'd be able to dismiss their opinion based solely off the the pit's testimony, such is my esteem for you fuckers ;)
But I do respect her, so I'd be interested in hearing everyone's opinion on the group, and how they arrived at it.
I have very limited personal experience reading/watching A Voice For Men media. But my understanding is that the main complaint against them from these quarters is that while much of their stuff is fine, too often their anger causes them to cross the line into actual misogyny. Perhaps there are others that can provide examples.jet_lagg wrote:I've been watching a lot of Karen Straughan this week. Particularly interesting are her statements concerning A Voice For Men, as they don't seem to match at all with the sentiments I see around here. If it were someone I didn't respect, I'd be able to dismiss their opinion based solely off the the pit's testimony, such is my esteem for you fuckers ;)
But I do respect her, so I'd be interested in hearing everyone's opinion on the group, and how they arrived at it.
Or a debate between Avicenna and Melody Hensley: My PTSD from Twitter is worse than yours from hearing distant explosions in Kuwait when you were a toddler.jugheadnaut wrote:
I've got a suggested panel.
Stephanie Zvan, Adria Richards and Alex McDonald on How To Conduct A Job Search When You Have An Extensive Online Social Justice Activism Profile. Moderated by Shanley Kane.
Melody Hensley and a US grunt with two very lively tours of Afghanistan behind him.jugheadnaut wrote:I've got a suggested panel.
Stephanie Zvan, Adria Richards and Alex McDonald on How To Conduct A Job Search When You Have An Extensive Online Social Justice Activism Profile. Moderated by Shanley Kane.
Indeed, but the Bolsheviks were just another symptom of the same condition that also drove the Nazi's, drives ISIL. Absolute certainty and a hatred of dissent. This is why free speech is mocked and degenerate art is so important to them, why defamation is valuable, as are witch hunts, inquisitions, purges. I think the actual condition could be described as "Useful Idiots."Lsuoma wrote:I see it as very similar to the Bolshevik mentality, driven by hate and envy, and mired in unreality. If you want to know what would happen if they gained power, look at Soviet history.Richard Dworkins wrote:I think arrogance is very generous James. To me, such thinking is dangerous no matter which paradise they proffer. The mindset seems to be primarily dysfunctional; it is an inability to accept that they are hostile and broken, not the world. They must fix the world because they cannot fix themselves. As far as I can tell this means that the entire gamut of human belief, experience and attitude must be cut to suit their ideologically pure cloth and that those who disagree must be less than human. Once established who the pure and the diabolical are it is only a matter of time until the knives come out, metaphorically or physically.James Caruthers wrote: I think the arrogance of utopians is a key point to emphasize.
To me Victim-Feminism is only a single example of this destructive mentality that a lot of humans still belabour under the impression that they are the good guys, even when beheading children or shovelling minorities into furnaces.
Here's the deal, a lot of those guys have gone through a living hell and are angry and pretty damn bitter. Kind of like Herr Miers and the rest of the SJW league, only most of them have been pampered little fucks and haven't lost everything -- children, houses, careers, businesses, etc. -- to a prejudiced and bigoted legal system that panders to women and crushes men.jet_lagg wrote:I've been watching a lot of Karen Straughan this week. Particularly interesting are her statements concerning A Voice For Men, as they don't seem to match at all with the sentiments I see around here. If it were someone I didn't respect, I'd be able to dismiss their opinion based solely off the the pit's testimony, such is my esteem for you fuckers ;)
But I do respect her, so I'd be interested in hearing everyone's opinion on the group, and how they arrived at it.
Yep, totally the wrong reason.JackSkeptic wrote:Nugent is doing it for the wrong reason. A friend is being attacked. As soon as that stops so will he. He has had numerous opportunities to do similar before and for far more egregious issues but he has ignored them. I am also not convinced it will do much at all. But that remains to be seen. If he continues on this path then I will change my mind.Glen_Davidson wrote:Surely you wouldn't rather that Nugent not finally take on the yammering ignoramuses, would you? Seems better late than never, even if it hardly shows much dedication to principle and/or courage.JackSkeptic wrote:
**stuff**
More importantly, though, shouldn't we ask if atheism really works in larger society? Are SJW parasites an aberration, or something highly likely to arise and ruin it for the rest when atheism becomes a broader position in society? I can't say that atheism has a very good track record as a social movement.
But that's devil's-advocate for a question that I think should be considered. Perhaps leaders more dedicated to principles of skepticism would marginalize a Pizzle before he became dangerous. Are such leaders likely, or not--and, could they be made more likely somehow? Or is it too tempting to go easy on "our guys" (and everyone does it--ripping apart an ally over something seen as trivial isn't good form) that there will always be leeches sucking out the good and leaving behind only shit?
I do think these are questions that deserve at least good attempts at answering.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p
<SNIP>.
One of Karen's better videos in fact acknowledges the anger and explains itTribble wrote:Here's the deal, a lot of those guys have gone through a living hell and are angry and pretty damn bitter. Kind of like Herr Miers and the rest of the SJW league, only most of them have been pampered little fucks and haven't lost everything -- children, houses, careers, businesses, etc. -- to a prejudiced and bigoted legal system that panders to women and crushes men.jet_lagg wrote:I've been watching a lot of Karen Straughan this week. Particularly interesting are her statements concerning A Voice For Men, as they don't seem to match at all with the sentiments I see around here. If it were someone I didn't respect, I'd be able to dismiss their opinion based solely off the the pit's testimony, such is my esteem for you fuckers ;)
But I do respect her, so I'd be interested in hearing everyone's opinion on the group, and how they arrived at it.
In their anger and bitterness, they act out, just like the SJWs most of us despise.
And speaking solely for myself, I don't screaming and yelling and acting ike fools to be very useful in advocacy. As it is, men are already behind the 8-ball in pressing thier complaints and explaining their issues. Acting like SJWs and writing/saying stupid stuff and then calling 'sarcasm' or 'irony' doesn't stop people from believing the literal interpretation and forming a negative impression.
I was going to watch it tonight, but didn't have time. I'll give it a look tomorrow. I quite like that Professor Xavier.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I just watched X-men: Days of Future Past. Wow, just wow!
Sadly I thought it was thoroughly average to meh - EXCEPT the Quicksilver stuff, which was just beyond brilliantbhoytony wrote:I was going to watch it tonight, but didn't have time. I'll give it a look tomorrow. I quite like that Professor Xavier.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I just watched X-men: Days of Future Past. Wow, just wow!
There are still a few genuine communists from the 70s here in Sweden. Most notable is probably Jan Myrdal, the son of Alva and Gunar Myrdal (both Nobel laureates!), who was a unofficial leader of the Swedish Maoists during the 70s. In the 90s he caused quite a few controversies because he still insisted on defending Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot, denying their crimes and for example claiming that the Chinese governments actions during the 1989 protests at Tienanmen Square were necessary and legitimate.Jan Steen wrote:Indeed. I see our SJWs as being the kind of idiots who used to idolize Mao and his Little Red Book, and did so stubbornly until they could no longer deny that they were worshipping one of the most evil mass murderers in human history. Is there anyone left who still reads the LRB to marvel at the wisdom of Chairman Mao? There have been and always will be idiots who believe that they are the righteous ones for having embraced a bunch of dogmas. Only the nature of the idiocy may change a bit.
Where are the seagulls when you need them?another lurker wrote:http://i.imgur.com/ko78E6e.jpg
So are those suspects for the recent murders in Thailand?KiwiInOz wrote:Where are the seagulls when you need them?another lurker wrote:http://i.imgur.com/ko78E6e.jpg
There's an exit poll showing 54-46 'No'. If that holds up, it's probably just enough of a margin that it won't be interpreted as close.austin wrote:We'll soon be finding out if the people of Winterfell, Castle Black and north of the Wall will be leaving Westeros.
Here's a nice video summary I found on the topic.
CH2O getting some sun.KiwiInOz wrote:Where are the seagulls when you need them?another lurker wrote:http://i.imgur.com/ko78E6e.jpg
http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2011 ... m-8201.jpgKiwiInOz wrote:Where are the seagulls when you need them?another lurker wrote:http://i.imgur.com/ko78E6e.jpg
SEVERE SUNBURN ALERT.BarnOwl wrote:http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2011 ... m-8201.jpgKiwiInOz wrote:Where are the seagulls when you need them?another lurker wrote:http://i.imgur.com/ko78E6e.jpg
Mine?
OK, I'll break out of my Shermer apathy stupor for a little while. Alison Smith's explanation seems plausible. She was being extra friendly trying to entice Shermer unknowingly into an uncomfortable situation. She claims it was to educate him, but payback was the more likely motive. But I think this explanation is still more consistent with sex that she regrets, and blames Shermer for, rather than really believing she was raped.Brive1987 wrote:Well fuck you and your Shermer apathy privilege.
:)
jet_lagg wrote:I've been watching a lot of Karen Straughan this week. Particularly interesting are her statements concerning A Voice For Men, as they don't seem to match at all with the sentiments I see around here. If it were someone I didn't respect, I'd be able to dismiss their opinion based solely off the the pit's testimony, such is my esteem for you fuckers ;)
But I do respect her, so I'd be interested in hearing everyone's opinion on the group, and how they arrived at it.
Figures Das Tit had it at hand. It could have extra gearing in the cassette to reverse the wheel. A small price to pay for a lemon-fresh gusset.BlueShiftRhino wrote:http://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/1750868_700b.jpg
Call me a hyperskeptic, but unless the guy is pedaling backwards, the bits and pieces flying out of his ass are going the wrong direction.
There's nothing wrong with A Voice for Men that couldn't be solved by sending Paul Elam on an extended vacation on the Island of Elba.jet_lagg wrote:I've been watching a lot of Karen Straughan this week. Particularly interesting are her statements concerning A Voice For Men, as they don't seem to match at all with the sentiments I see around here. If it were someone I didn't respect, I'd be able to dismiss their opinion based solely off the the pit's testimony, such is my esteem for you fuckers ;)
But I do respect her, so I'd be interested in hearing everyone's opinion on the group, and how they arrived at it.
:lol:Gumby wrote:http://i.imgur.com/E5GX5Mt.jpg
I had this Uncle by marriage with my loopy Aunt that was totally into EST back in the day. Werner Earhard, being paid money to be screamed at, the whole deal. He was the very definition of "too liberal to take his own side in an argument". I remember one dinner table conversation where he claimed that dressing too nicely put the blame on him for being mugged.DeepInsideYourMind wrote: Even in his post he is trying to remain friends with Oaphie, even as she virtually spits on him via Twitter. She is showing complete disdain for him, and despite this he keeps praising her and telling her that it's just this one little thing that he is a bit upset about.
He cannot see that this is not an isolated incident, it isn't the views of one isolated cretin, it is an ideology, one the people he is praising are fully signed up to.
He won't "take a side", as doing that requires that you upset and distance some people - he won't alienate any of his 'friends' because his nature is to try and act as a mediator and moderator - he believes that there is a middle ground that people can be brought into.
Castro's got one ugly-assed turkey neck.
This should be done with bin Laden, and the belly button can represent a bullet hole in his forehead. If a man then has sex with her, he is screwing bin Laden.
And yet, a part of me likes it a lot.Mykeru wrote:I had this Uncle by marriage with my loopy Aunt that was totally into EST back in the day. Werner Earhard, being paid money to be screamed at, the whole deal. He was the very definition of "too liberal to take his own side in an argument". I remember one dinner table conversation where he claimed that dressing too nicely put the blame on him for being mugged.DeepInsideYourMind wrote: Even in his post he is trying to remain friends with Oaphie, even as she virtually spits on him via Twitter. She is showing complete disdain for him, and despite this he keeps praising her and telling her that it's just this one little thing that he is a bit upset about.
He cannot see that this is not an isolated incident, it isn't the views of one isolated cretin, it is an ideology, one the people he is praising are fully signed up to.
He won't "take a side", as doing that requires that you upset and distance some people - he won't alienate any of his 'friends' because his nature is to try and act as a mediator and moderator - he believes that there is a middle ground that people can be brought into.
He thought he was enlightened, whereas he was a posturing piece of shit. He wore this crap thinking it made him a sage the same way Stephen Segal thinks wearing a Nehru jacket and beads makes him a Buddhist.
The problem that plagues the Atheist community in particular is just this kind of posturing. Where people aren't trying to drill down to something like reality, but prove how damned open minded they are, and entirely dispense with substance to maintain a smug style that lets them fence sit endlessly, because nothing says how sensible you are like having a pointed wood slat jammed up your ass.
You know the XKCD cartoon about the agnostic throwing up his hands and leaving the issue unresolved provided it makes him think he's superior? Yeah, they are like that.
Castro's got one ugly-assed turkey neck.
http://static01.nyt.com/images/2014/09/ ... eLarge.jpgcomhcinc wrote:http://www.arethescotsindependentyet.com/
I generally like Karen Straughan, based on some of the videos I've seen on her critique of feminism seem spot on, which is all I care about or have paid attention to. As far as AVFM, I have little to no knowledge of, nor do I care. Critique of feminism doesn't entail embracing of radical masculinism.Mykeru wrote:There's nothing wrong with A Voice for Men that couldn't be solved by sending Paul Elam on an extended vacation on the Island of Elba.jet_lagg wrote:I've been watching a lot of Karen Straughan this week. Particularly interesting are her statements concerning A Voice For Men, as they don't seem to match at all with the sentiments I see around here. If it were someone I didn't respect, I'd be able to dismiss their opinion based solely off the the pit's testimony, such is my esteem for you fuckers ;)
But I do respect her, so I'd be interested in hearing everyone's opinion on the group, and how they arrived at it.
Actually, the face caricature came from this shop I found:jugheadnaut wrote::lol:Gumby wrote:[.img]http://i.imgur.com/E5GX5Mt.jpg[/img]
I'm fascinated with simple caricatures, probably because I can't do them but would like to. In this case, we really just have a few lines, a circle and some scribbles with absolutely no shading and yet it's unmistakably Melody Hensley, as much as if it were a photograph. I'm familiar with pareidolia, and no doubt that's playing a big role here. But I wonder what percentage of people have the sort of features that makes them so easy to caricature clearly. Does the fact that she has such a distinctive hairstyle and glasses make this possible?
I predicted a NO vote earlier. I'm not surprised. I think they got cold feet especially because of the economic uncertainty Independence would entail. However, it wouldn't surprise me if another vote would come up in the future with a different result. It also would surprise me if succession movements in the US gain traction in the future.jugheadnaut wrote:There's an exit poll showing 54-46 'No'. If that holds up, it's probably just enough of a margin that it won't be interpreted as close.austin wrote:We'll soon be finding out if the people of Winterfell, Castle Black and north of the Wall will be leaving Westeros.
Here's a nice video summary I found on the topic.
