Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

Old subthreads
CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16261

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:19 pm

aratina wrote:
franc wrote:
aratina wrote:Apparently, the newest myth is that franc assumed the identity of this other guy and then went around for years telling everyone he was this other guy (which there is proof of), and now this other guy is dying of cancer and all the people franc fucked with are bashing not franc but this other guy because franc assumed the identity of the this other guy. I'll be interested in hearing the new twists this legend takes as franc tries to find a way to blame everyone else again. :popcorn:
You stupid cunt. I explained what you idiots did in basic english and even showed where you did it - you, or one of your monkey-see-monkey-do idiots that ape your idiocy - prank called someone in a large retirement village associated with an orthodox monastery. Yes you idiots did. It is a place I know quite well as does anyone else with roots tracing back to various slavic refugee streams.
:lol: :lol: :popcorn:

P.S. Does he know because he goes to church there?
franc wrote:You are vicious idiots that have no concern whatsoever about who it is you actually do end up harassing in the name of SocJus. And you are boneheaded enough to criticise WEIT/Joyne...

I thought I had met some pretty fucked up, morally destitute people in my life... liars, thieves, junkies and even murderers. But even they have occasional moments of lucidity and understand that their behaviour is abhorrent. You slugs have no such impediments. You make them seem positively saintly. It really is unfortunate there is no hell.
:clap: :lol: :lol:

In other words, he's got nothing.
He's got nothing? Vicious little cunts calling and harassing senior citizens in end-of-life care, because they think Franc might be there? And you make a decidedly stupid quip about going to church, and claim he's got nothing. No apologies, no "yeah, that was wrong, that was really fucked up."

You are profoundly disappointing.

Jiminy Cricket
.
.
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 10:17 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16262

Post by Jiminy Cricket » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:20 pm

aratina wrote:
Skep tickle wrote:Myers doesn’t (AFAIK) change the content of posts so that they show something quite different than the poster intended, as Crommunist used to do at FTB (and even as Michael Nugent apparently does, more benignly, by removing content without leaving any indication that he has done so).
Yes. Good point that even Michael Nugent does that irritating censuring thing. In fact, if he hadn't with respect to the name of the person that was being accused of rape, he probably would have gotten his response from PZ, IMO.
You mean this response?

http://www.michaelnugent.com/wp-content ... -Smear.png

Nowhere in that defamatory smear does Myers say anything about an alleged rapist. He says, quite clearly, that Michael Nugent provides a haven for harassers, misogynists, and rapists and references unnamed commenters here as support for that libelous assertion.

I've asked you before without getting an answer: Is there any behavior of Myers that you won't condone? Are you really as ethically challenged as he has proven himself to be?

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 10350
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16263

Post by free thoughtpolice » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:22 pm

When PZ had a list of who was banned, he got yelled at for it.
:D :D :drool: :D :D
If you mean his "Dungeon", that was laughing , not yelling.

Tribble
.
.
Posts: 5102
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16264

Post by Tribble » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:24 pm

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: He's got nothing? Vicious little cunts calling and harassing senior citizens in end-of-life care, because they think Franc might be there? And you make a decidedly stupid quip about going to church, and claim he's got nothing. No apologies, no "yeah, that was wrong, that was really fucked up."

You are profoundly disappointing.
Yeppers. That's why I really don't give two fucks what the little weasel says. I knew he was stupid from Twitter and the few places I'd run into him on the Internet in general. He's just doubled-down on the inability to be human and it's time for the gom jabbar.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10642
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16265

Post by Lsuoma » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:25 pm

free thoughtpolice wrote:
When PZ had a list of who was banned, he got yelled at for it.
:D :D :drool: :D :D
If you mean his "Dungeon", that was laughing , not yelling.
People were PROUD of being there, in many cases.

Tribble
.
.
Posts: 5102
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16266

Post by Tribble » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:26 pm

Lsuoma wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
When PZ had a list of who was banned, he got yelled at for it.
:D :D :drool: :D :D
If you mean his "Dungeon", that was laughing , not yelling.
People were PROUD of being there, in many cases.
Some were. Some were. Thing is, so many were there because Myers couldn't deal with them ripping his shoddy logic apart. So they became 'tedious trolls' and were banned. Not because they were trolls, but because Myers defined dissent as trolling.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16267

Post by Southern » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:27 pm

Shatterface as Guest wrote:
Southern wrote:They also conflate threats with criticism and name calling. I do now wish to kill, maim, or rape Anita Sarkeesian, but she's such a cancer to modern gaming and such a scammer, I reserve myself the right to call her a disingenuous, thieving cunt with a toxic agenda and a vacuous approach to a problem only she and her network of stupidity.
I think you might have need of the edit button.

Shatterface
Do I? Or maybe that was what I actually meant?

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rfh4Mhp-a6U/hqdefault.jpg

...

No, yeah, I need my edit button, inb4 "death and raep threats!".

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6335
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16268

Post by Really? » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:29 pm

Tigzy wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:Sarkeesian is so thrilled at her fundraising success after the Utah threat thing she has decided to post some more and PZ has a mini post up about it.
https://archive.today/L4UaW
The irony is that half of the abusive tweets she is getting are mild in comparison to the kind of invective you see at Pharyngula, and the worst of these threats are pretty much in line with the "die in a fire" and "get raped with a dead porcupine".
Some are almost as bad as pz's remarks about shanking xtians though.
How do you get a gig paying in the 6 figures for just putting up with empty threats on the internet? :think: I could use that kind of cash.
There are definitely a few open rape threats there, though. Not nice at all. This one -

http://media.tumblr.com/59afc493b4a6938 ... qikfve.jpg

- has such a high level of WTFery about it, it's difficult to say if it's just an exceptionally dense troll or someone unhinged enough to be genuinely concerned about.

It'd be curious to see if Thunderf00t gets a similar amount of tweets of this 'quality' during a week. I wouldn't be surprised if he has.
In all of the excitement of the past few months, wasn't it proven that Sarkeesian never actually contacted the FBI?

If someone threatens you for real, you don't use it for e-begging, you go to the cops.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16269

Post by Southern » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:31 pm

aratina wrote: P.S. Does he know because he goes to church there?
You do know that some atheists go to church, either to still be part of the community or or because some personal reason, right? Not every atheist is angry against all churches and all religions like the "Happy Tentacle Rape Hentai Apologist Atheist".

I'm not one of them, I don't care about churches in any way, shape or form (not even for their historical or artistic value). But there are some who do.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16270

Post by cunt » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:33 pm

Really? wrote:In all of the excitement of the past few months, wasn't it proven that Sarkeesian never actually contacted the FBI?

If someone threatens you for real, you don't use it for e-begging, you go to the cops.
So... you proved a negative? Do you have access to the FBI database or something?

Guestus Aurelius
.
.
Posts: 2118
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 5:14 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16271

Post by Guestus Aurelius » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:34 pm

@Aratina:

Sorry if you already addressed this and I missed it, but I wanted to ask: did you do what franc says you did? Did you prank call end-of-life care patients?

Tribble
.
.
Posts: 5102
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16272

Post by Tribble » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:37 pm

Guestus Aurelius wrote:@Aratina:

Sorry if you already addressed this and I missed it, but I wanted to ask: did you do what franc says you did? Did you prank call end-of-life care patients?
Would he admit it if he did? Is franc lying? We don't have any real to know.

However, having watched both parties involved, I'd tend to take franc's word over ariatna's simply because of the general conduct of the parties, especially regards to truthful and accurate reporting, in other environments.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16273

Post by Southern » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:45 pm

Tribble wrote:
Guestus Aurelius wrote:@Aratina:

Sorry if you already addressed this and I missed it, but I wanted to ask: did you do what franc says you did? Did you prank call end-of-life care patients?
Would he admit it if he did? Is franc lying? We don't have any real to know.

However, having watched both parties involved, I'd tend to take franc's word over ariatna's simply because of the general conduct of the parties, especially regards to truthful and accurate reporting, in other environments.
However²: if Aratina says that he personally didn't do it, I'll take his word for it (since franc probably can't pinpoint exactly who did it, anyway - he can only infer that someone with access to the fake dox was doing it).

Then again, I made an involuntary death threat to Anita Sarkeesian, so I'm not feeling particularly bright today; you can disregard my comments on the matter. And people think you have to be frothing with rage and hate to make one of those!

SoylentAtheist

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16274

Post by SoylentAtheist » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:48 pm

Tigzy wrote:British chancellor George Osborne, giving Greg Laden a lesson in inadvertantly embarrasing photo ops:

http://i.imgur.com/K2h08Uh.jpg
I was wondering what was embarrassing about that photo. Little did I consider I should be looking for inadvertent cock-a-likes.

http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/27/george-os ... r-5038051/

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16275

Post by Southern » Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:55 pm

SoylentAtheist wrote:
Tigzy wrote:British chancellor George Osborne, giving Greg Laden a lesson in inadvertantly embarrasing photo ops:

http://i.imgur.com/K2h08Uh.jpg
I was wondering what was embarrassing about that photo. Little did I consider I should be looking for inadvertent cock-a-likes.

http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/27/george-os ... r-5038051/
Scented Nectar does not approve George Osborne.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6452
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16276

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Tue Jan 27, 2015 6:08 pm

Tigzy wrote:British chancellor George Osborne, giving Greg Laden a lesson in inadvertantly embarrasing photo ops:

http://i.imgur.com/K2h08Uh.jpg

For those who do not click:

http://i.imgur.com/xJEllY9.jpg

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 7965
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16277

Post by AndrewV69 » Tue Jan 27, 2015 6:10 pm

aratina wrote:Yep. I think it used to be more of a high barrier to get one's info leaked, but at least he is upfront about it, which is another thing I knew about while commenting there and knew it was a risk of commenting there were I to wish to remain anonymous under any handle. Gee, it's almost like you don't think he is such a bad person after all! Not sure I expected that from anyone here.
Huh?

I suspect that most people here have enough smarts to recognize that humans have a mix of "bad" and/or "good" traits. Not many people are wholly one or the other.

Nothing wrong with acknowledging the good traits while denigrating the bad nor does the former imply you endorse the latter or vice versa.

In other words, most here are adults.

YMMV

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16278

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 6:14 pm

Tribble wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: He's got nothing? Vicious little cunts calling and harassing senior citizens in end-of-life care, because they think Franc might be there? And you make a decidedly stupid quip about going to church, and claim he's got nothing. No apologies, no "yeah, that was wrong, that was really fucked up."

You are profoundly disappointing.
Yeppers. That's why I really don't give two fucks what the little weasel says. I knew he was stupid from Twitter and the few places I'd run into him on the Internet in general. He's just doubled-down on the inability to be human and it's time for the gom jabbar.
I thought I would give him a chance. I'm stupid that way (and in so many others).

Steers, this is why I give not a single fuck about cheap shots. We are dealing with people who have limited or no morality. My hunch is part of the reason they don the SJW armor is to give themselves guidance in lieu of a real moral compass.

Aratina displays this in spades; false accusations of rape, innocents doxxed instead of their real target, libellous insults don't bother him. He has no real compassion or empathy, just a vacuous morally bankrupt philosophy of "intersectional" feminism. This gives him the comfort of fooling himself into believing he is a moral agent, despite repeated actions proving otherwise.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10642
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16279

Post by Lsuoma » Tue Jan 27, 2015 6:17 pm

SoylentAtheist wrote:
Tigzy wrote:British chancellor George Osborne, giving Greg Laden a lesson in inadvertantly embarrasing photo ops:

http://i.imgur.com/K2h08Uh.jpg
I was wondering what was embarrassing about that photo. Little did I consider I should be looking for inadvertent cock-a-likes.

http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/27/george-os ... r-5038051/
[youtube]AK3LduV4-tg[/youtube]

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 7965
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16280

Post by AndrewV69 » Tue Jan 27, 2015 6:24 pm

Lsuoma wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
When PZ had a list of who was banned, he got yelled at for it.
:D :D :drool: :D :D
If you mean his "Dungeon", that was laughing , not yelling.
People were PROUD of being there, in many cases.
/wave

I know my entry in the Dungeon was one I used to be able to point to in real life. It really helped me in one instance to make my case.

screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2347
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16281

Post by screwtape » Tue Jan 27, 2015 6:46 pm

Aratina, you might want to reflect upon the fact that if Pizzle's dungeon were still being updated you would now be in it, having signed up here. Incidentally, doing so also made you a harasser, misogynist and rapist, and if you feel that might be unfair or inaccurate, welcome to the club. But while we are excluding people from normal discourse, I guess your membership here means you have to add your own name to, what?, level one of the Blockbot? Funny how it all works, isn't it?

franc
.
.
Posts: 2437
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16282

Post by franc » Tue Jan 27, 2015 6:51 pm

TheMudbrooker wrote:Pickled eggs unavailable outside the UK?
Clearly you've never been out drinking in Wisconsin (or northern Minnesota or the UP for that matter) nearly every neighborhood tavern has pickled eggs, pickled pork hocks and Blind Robins to munch on. The best ones have pickled heart too.
Or Moe's Tavern in Springfield.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16283

Post by Skep tickle » Tue Jan 27, 2015 6:52 pm

Lsuoma wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
aratina wrote: When PZ had a list of who was banned, he got yelled at for it.
:D :D :drool: :D :D
If you mean his "Dungeon", that was laughing , not yelling.
People were PROUD of being there, in many cases.
AndrewV69 wrote:/wave

I know my entry in the Dungeon was one I used to be able to point to in real life. It really helped me in one instance to make my case.
Yeah, it seemed such a shame that by the time he banned me, he just had a general entry in the Dungeon for the growing # of those identified as slymepitters, though the pioneers like Phil & several others here had earned individual entries.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10642
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16284

Post by Lsuoma » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:08 pm

Gah! Suffering from rectorrhagia. Time to go to urgent care, I guess :-(

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16285

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:13 pm

screwtape wrote:Aratina, you might want to reflect upon the fact that if Pizzle's dungeon were still being updated you would now be in it, having signed up here. Incidentally, doing so also made you a harasser, misogynist and rapist, and if you feel that might be unfair or inaccurate, welcome to the club. But while we are excluding people from normal discourse, I guess your membership here means you have to add your own name to, what?, level one of the Blockbot? Funny how it all works, isn't it?
I suspect we are being too generous to Aratina. He is here to score points. I doubt his reflective powers allow him the understanding of his hypocrisy. His repeated chant to doxxing somebody seems to be "I don't see the harm, don't want to, ergo no harm!" As I said earlier, most SJWs seem to have a stunted or even absent sense of empathy or morality, and substitute scoring their "Points."

This is why they can't survive in unmoderated spaces. Their arguments consist in finding tiny perceived flaws in some aspect of their opponents wording, and try to score points based on that. They rarely address the actual point, and seem bewildered when asked to address that point. If they can't find problematic wording, they insult the person, ignore the point, and slink home declaring victory.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16286

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:15 pm

Lsuoma wrote:Gah! Suffering from rectorrhagia. Time to go to urgent care, I guess :-(
Ouch, good luck.

Shatterface as Guest

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16287

Post by Shatterface as Guest » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:24 pm

Damion's turtle head has poked out on Nugent's.

I know everyone here already knows he's a bell-end but worth putting it out there were others might read it that he offered us Aratina's phone number and we told him to fuck off.

The more people that know that the better.

Shatterface

Guestus Aurelius
.
.
Posts: 2118
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 5:14 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16288

Post by Guestus Aurelius » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:29 pm

Lsuoma wrote:Gah! Suffering from rectorrhagia. Time to go to urgent care, I guess :-(
Sorry to hear that, FT. Get well soon.

Eskarina
.
.
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 12:55 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16289

Post by Eskarina » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:37 pm

Shatterface as Guest wrote:Damion's turtle head has poked out on Nugent's.

I know everyone here already knows he's a bell-end but worth putting it out there were others might read it that he offered us Aratina's phone number and we told him to fuck off.

The more people that know that the better.
Plus, he was more than willing to assist the 'pit in doxxing Ogvorbis, instead of contacting the proper authorities or at least soiling his own blog.

Another time he was told to fuck off here.

Take care, Lsuoma!

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16290

Post by cunt » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:43 pm

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Aratina displays this in spades; false accusations of rape, innocents doxxed instead of their real target, libellous insults don't bother him. He has no real compassion or empathy, just a vacuous morally bankrupt philosophy of "intersectional" feminism. This gives him the comfort of fooling himself into believing he is a moral agent, despite repeated actions proving otherwise.
Blah blah blah. Strut around on your high-horse some more. You're as bad as they are.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 10350
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16291

Post by free thoughtpolice » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:46 pm

Good Luck Supreme Leader!

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10642
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16292

Post by Lsuoma » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:47 pm

Ho, ho! I was researching rectal bleeding and found this truncated definition:

http://slymepit.com/staticimgs/rectbleed.jpg

franc
.
.
Posts: 2437
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16293

Post by franc » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:54 pm

aratina wrote:P.S. Does he know because he goes to church there?
You fucking stupid cunt cunt. I even said I had often been there for easter masses. You stupid cunt. The monastery even housed the orthodox southern hemisphere patriarch for some time. The place is as well known of as the Vatican to slavs down here. You stupid cunt. This is how much "research" you do with your sewer crawling.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16294

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:57 pm

cunt wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Aratina displays this in spades; false accusations of rape, innocents doxxed instead of their real target, libellous insults don't bother him. He has no real compassion or empathy, just a vacuous morally bankrupt philosophy of "intersectional" feminism. This gives him the comfort of fooling himself into believing he is a moral agent, despite repeated actions proving otherwise.
Blah blah blah. Strut around on your high-horse some more. You're as bad as they are.
Hiya, cunt! Scrapped enough dried shit off your fingers to reply, and to me of all people! I always knew I was your favorite. Oh, others will be jealous, but I will simply bask in your bleary gaze.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16295

Post by Skep tickle » Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:57 pm

Lsuoma wrote:Ho, ho! I was researching rectal bleeding and found this truncated definition:

[.img]http://slymepit.com/staticimgs/rectbleed.jpg[/img]
Did they do any biopsies during your colonoscopy today?*

*Disclaimer: You should only reveal as much of your personal medical history online as you are comfortable having others know, and in revealing even limited personal medical information you should recognize that it's possible others might speculate about what's going on, and/or make jokes about the situation.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16296

Post by cunt » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:00 pm

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
cunt wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Aratina displays this in spades; false accusations of rape, innocents doxxed instead of their real target, libellous insults don't bother him. He has no real compassion or empathy, just a vacuous morally bankrupt philosophy of "intersectional" feminism. This gives him the comfort of fooling himself into believing he is a moral agent, despite repeated actions proving otherwise.
Blah blah blah. Strut around on your high-horse some more. You're as bad as they are.
Hiya, cunt! Scrapped enough dried shit off your fingers to reply, and to me of all people! I always knew I was your favorite. Oh, others will be jealous, but I will simply bask in your bleary gaze.
Yeah, because you've got no answer to my point that you're acting exactly like the type of sanctimonious prick arsehole you've spent all this time claiming to despise.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10642
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16297

Post by Lsuoma » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:06 pm

Skep tickle wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:Ho, ho! I was researching rectal bleeding and found this truncated definition:

[.img]http://slymepit.com/staticimgs/rectbleed.jpg[/img]
Did they do any biopsies during your colonoscopy today?*

*Disclaimer: You should only reveal as much of your personal medical history online as you are comfortable having others know, and in revealing even limited personal medical information you should recognize that it's possible others might speculate about what's going on, and/or make jokes about the situation.
Love the disclaimer. Yes, I had a 2cm polyp, likely an adenoma, removed about three centimeters up the rectum from the anus. The doc said there might be some rectal bleeding, but I've passed around 15ml of fresh blood so far, which seems a bit excessive.

franc
.
.
Posts: 2437
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16298

Post by franc » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:07 pm

Southern wrote:
aratina wrote: P.S. Does he know because he goes to church there?
You do know that some atheists go to church, either to still be part of the community or or because some personal reason, right? Not every atheist is angry against all churches and all religions like the "Happy Tentacle Rape Hentai Apologist Atheist".

I'm not one of them, I don't care about churches in any way, shape or form (not even for their historical or artistic value). But there are some who do.
I view the orthodox church much the same way that many atheist Jews view Judaism. It's there and it's got a pretty rich cultural heritage. I even recommend godless folks experience the orthodox easter midnight mass first hand if they ever get the chance - especially at one of the older churches. It is a fascinating piece of anthropological theatre and you really get to see first hand exactly how blurred the lines are between early xtianity and paganism. It is good value if you have an interest in the outside world, how it formed and have a desire to educate yourself about it. So natch, this is all alien to Ratty and the baboon troop. It risks changing preconceptions and immutable beliefs.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16299

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:08 pm

cunt wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
cunt wrote: snip (set to banjo music)

Blah blah blah. Strut around on your high-horse some more. You're as bad as they are.
Hiya, cunt! Scrapped enough dried shit off your fingers to reply, and to me of all people! I always knew I was your favorite. Oh, others will be jealous, but I will simply bask in your bleary gaze.
Yeah, because you've got no answer to my point that you're acting exactly like the type of sanctimonious prick arsehole you've spent all this time claiming to despise.
I claim to despise? All this time? Golly, mister, you sure seem to know a lot about me! I know you're a fan and all, but still...kinda creepy. You're not a creeper are you Mr. cunt?

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16300

Post by cunt » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:11 pm

Oh look the idiots responded again, and he still won't address the matter of him being a sanctimonious little shit. What a fucking surprise.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6335
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16301

Post by Really? » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:13 pm

screwtape wrote:Aratina, you might want to reflect upon the fact that if Pizzle's dungeon were still being updated you would now be in it, having signed up here. Incidentally, doing so also made you a harasser, misogynist and rapist, and if you feel that might be unfair or inaccurate, welcome to the club. But while we are excluding people from normal discourse, I guess your membership here means you have to add your own name to, what?, level one of the Blockbot? Funny how it all works, isn't it?
Oh, that's a good point. What's the proper BlockBot protocol?

Someone should tweet out:

@BlockBot @aratina ++Level1 ++Confirmed Slymer

What's the right way to send a tip to the current Block Bot admins about their new apostate?

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16302

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:18 pm

cunt wrote:Oh look the idiots responded again, and he still won't address the matter of him being a sanctimonious little shit. What a fucking surprise.
I'm hardly a sanctimonious little shit; first, I'm really large, second, I'm not a shit, and third (and this is the good bit), I happen to be right! Yay for me!

You go back to drinking your shoe polish and making random observations about your lack of sanctimonious-ness.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10642
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16303

Post by Lsuoma » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:21 pm

Really? wrote:
screwtape wrote:Aratina, you might want to reflect upon the fact that if Pizzle's dungeon were still being updated you would now be in it, having signed up here. Incidentally, doing so also made you a harasser, misogynist and rapist, and if you feel that might be unfair or inaccurate, welcome to the club. But while we are excluding people from normal discourse, I guess your membership here means you have to add your own name to, what?, level one of the Blockbot? Funny how it all works, isn't it?
Oh, that's a good point. What's the proper BlockBot protocol?

Someone should tweet out:

@BlockBot @aratina ++Level1 ++Confirmed Slymer

What's the right way to send a tip to the current Block Bot admins about their new apostate?
I believe we have a fifth columnist here who might be able to do that for you...

franc
.
.
Posts: 2437
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16304

Post by franc » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:21 pm

Shatterface as Guest wrote:Damion's turtle head has poked out on Nugent's.

I know everyone here already knows he's a bell-end but worth putting it out there were others might read it that he offered us Aratina's phone number and we told him to fuck off.

The more people that know that the better.
Here's one of his contributions there -
damion_nugent_pit.png
(14.49 KiB) Downloaded 162 times
Yes, he is slimier than oolon.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16305

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:22 pm

Really? wrote:
screwtape wrote:Aratina, you might want to reflect upon the fact that if Pizzle's dungeon were still being updated you would now be in it, having signed up here. Incidentally, doing so also made you a harasser, misogynist and rapist, and if you feel that might be unfair or inaccurate, welcome to the club. But while we are excluding people from normal discourse, I guess your membership here means you have to add your own name to, what?, level one of the Blockbot? Funny how it all works, isn't it?
Oh, that's a good point. What's the proper BlockBot protocol?

Someone should tweet out:

@BlockBot @aratina ++Level1 ++Confirmed Slymer

What's the right way to send a tip to the current Block Bot admins about their new apostate?
Ah, but they will enact the "It's Okay When We Do It" protocol to override.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16306

Post by cunt » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:22 pm

I take it back, CaptainFluffyBunny can't be called a little shit, because he's actually obese. I'll call him a fat fuck from now on.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16307

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:24 pm

cunt wrote:I take it back, CaptainFluffyBunny can't be called a little shit, because he's actually obese. I'll call him a fat fuck from now on.
No, not obese. Just tall. I won't call myself beautiful. Too many do that already, and I'm afraid it might reduce my modesty.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16308

Post by cunt » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:26 pm

Nice try fat fuck but you said you were large not tall.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16309

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:29 pm

cunt wrote:Nice try fat fuck but you said you were large not tall.
Oh, yeah, sing it to me, cunt! Righteous!

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16310

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:30 pm

Jet_lagg should be here. He gets "cunt".

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16311

Post by cunt » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:33 pm

[youtube]_aQF_iJKg0I[/youtube]

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16312

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:36 pm

Poor cunt. Full of fail and whatever cleaning fluid he swiped off the janitor's cart.

dogen
.
.
Posts: 2579
Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16313

Post by dogen » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:44 pm

Lsuoma wrote:Gah! Suffering from rectorrhagia. Time to go to urgent care, I guess :-(
Man, hope you get that sorted out quick!

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16314

Post by cunt » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:44 pm

Oh dear.. Don't call captainfatassbunny fat or he'll accuse you of drinking cleaning products and still being smarter than he is.

Top kek

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16315

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:48 pm

cunt wrote:Oh dear.. Don't call captainfatassbunny fat or he'll accuse you of drinking cleaning products and still being smarter than he is.

Top kek
Yeah, look at me, poking drunks for lulz. I'm a bad bunny. But in my defense, cunt is usually more incoherently lulzy. Not tonight, sadly.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16316

Post by cunt » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:49 pm

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
cunt wrote:Oh dear.. Don't call captainfatassbunny fat or he'll accuse you of drinking cleaning products and still being smarter than he is.

Top kek
Yeah, look at me, poking drunks for lulz. I'm a bad bunny. But in my defense, cunt is usually more incoherently lulzy. Not tonight, sadly.
Shut up fat fuck.

Parody Accountant
.
.
Posts: 4520
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:16 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16317

Post by Parody Accountant » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:58 pm

Welcome back cunt.

Parody Accountant
.
.
Posts: 4520
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:16 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16318

Post by Parody Accountant » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:00 pm

And since I know you're not staying long... farewell.
http://i.imgur.com/ZvTkcg3.jpg

Service Dog
.
.
Posts: 4579
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16319

Post by Service Dog » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:02 pm

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... Senate.jpg
Rebecca Ann Latimer Felton (June 10, 1835 – January 24, 1930) was an American writer, lecturer, reformer, and politician who became the first woman to serve in the United States Senate.[1] She was the most prominent woman in Georgia in the Progressive Era, and was honored by appointment to the Senate. She was sworn in November 21, 1922, and served just 24 hours. At 87 years, nine months, and 22 days old, she was the oldest freshman senator to enter the Senate. To date, she is also the only woman to have served as a Senator from Georgia. Her husband William Harrell Felton was a member of the United States House of Representatives and Georgia House of Representatives and she ran his campaigns. She was a prominent society woman; an advocate of prison reform, women's suffrage and educational modernization; and one of the few prominent women who spoke in favor of lynching. Bartley reports that by 1915 she "was championing a lengthy feminist program that ranged from prohibition to equal pay for equal work."[2]
Felton owned slaves before the Civil War,[6] and was the last member of either house of Congress to have been a slave owner.[7]
Felton was a white supremacist. She claimed, for instance, that the more money that Georgia spent on black education, the more crimes blacks committed.[8] For the 1893 World's Columbian Exhibition, she "proposed a southern exhibit 'illustrating the slave period,' with a cabin and 'real colored folks making mats, shuck collars, and baskets—a woman to spin and card cotton—and another to play banjo and show the actual life of [the] slave—not the Uncle Tom sort.'" She wanted to display "the ignorant contented darky—as distinguished from [Harriet Beecher] Stowe's monstrosities."[8]
Felton considered "young blacks" who sought equal treatment "half-civilized gorillas," and ascribed to them a "brutal lust" for white women.[9] While seeking suffrage for women, she decried voting rights for blacks, arguing that it led directly to the rape of white women.[10]
In 1899, a massive crowd of white Georgians tortured, mutilated, and burned a black man, Sam Hose, who purportedly had killed a white man in self-defense but had not committed the rape of the white woman whites accused him of. The crowd divided and sold his physical remains as souvenirs, Felton said that any "true-hearted husband or father" would have killed "the beast" and that Hose was due less sympathy than a rabid dog.[11]
Felton also advocated more lynchings of black men, saying that such was "elysian" compared to the rape of white women.[12] On at least one occasion, she stated that white Southerners should "lynch a thousand [black men] a week if it becomes necessary" to "protect woman's dearest possession."[13]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_Latimer_Felton

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16320

Post by cunt » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:09 pm

Parody Accountant wrote:And since I know you're not staying long... farewell.
http://i.imgur.com/ZvTkcg3.jpg
I'm a humble dad supporting his daughters in the ways that I can.

http://i.imgur.com/V5wNW8l.jpg

Locked