Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

Old subthreads
franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16381

Post by franc »

Dworkins Unplugged. wrote:
franc wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Sadly, it seems to be, from the multiple pictures of him I've seen. It's not even funny anymore.


http://freethoughtblogs.com/godlessness ... /07/01.jpg

Well, ok, still a bit funny.
What has happened to our species over the last few decades? At least our liberalised western species. It's like as a whole branch of ethnicity, we have chosen biological suicide. Even the weediest, most effeminate book wormy guys in school when I was growing up would look at this twit and have to seriously suppress the urge to pound his face into the concrete. Even John Waters in the '70s never dreamt up clown caricatures like this.
Feminism happened, a narrative was constructed in which women promoted the idea of wanting men to be more like "women" (meaning whining middle class feminists with egos larger than their abilities). This narrative permeated throughout media enclaves (the only places feminists seem to be able to work in without making an exhibition of themselves) and more importantly marketing and advertisers saw a niche market to develop. After almost 50 years it's hardly a surprise that many young men think being both "hip" and attractive to women means reducing all masculine signals and behaviours, to whine endlessly on phones about how unfair life is.

It probably explains why so many blokes in their late 20's to mid 40's have said fuck that and instead get stoned and spend their days on their games consoles, or go get "swole".
All of that is self-evident. But the social engineering seems to have permeated through on a genetic level. It's like a gene pool that wants to kill itself.

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16382

Post by franc »

SoylentAtheist wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
subbie1957 wrote:
Is that his real appearance?

In all honesty, I thought it was a fake picture, to hide his real identity, or as a bit of an in-joke.
Sadly, it seems to be, from the multiple pictures of him I've seen. It's not even funny anymore.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/godlessness ... /07/01.jpg
Well, ok, still a bit funny.
Please tell me he cuts his own hair. I would hat to see a barber get hit with a multi-million dollar malpractice suit.
Think of a penis that only grows pubic hair on its glans.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16383

Post by Badger3k »

aratina wrote::popcorn:
franc wrote:
aratina wrote:P.S. Does he know because he goes to church there?
You fucking stupid cunt cunt. I even said I had often been there for easter masses. You stupid cunt. The monastery even housed the orthodox southern hemisphere patriarch for some time. The place is as well known of as the Vatican to slavs down here. You stupid cunt. This is how much "research" you do with your sewer crawling.
I hope you all read that. :lol:
Maybe you can explain why it matters? You asked if he goes there, he says he said he did, and explains how anyone can know there is a church there anyway. What's the big deal? I don't go to church of any kind, and I know where quite a few are from just living in my town for 25 years. If Franc was religious it still wouldn't change anything. Was there a point other than to get Franc to call you a cunt?

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16384

Post by Brive1987 »

What the hell is up with PZ's parody FtB complaint email post?

Do we SPAM? Me thinks not.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16385

Post by Southern »

aratina wrote::popcorn:
franc wrote:
You fucking stupid cunt cunt. I even said I had often been there for easter masses. You stupid cunt. The monastery even housed the orthodox southern hemisphere patriarch for some time. The place is as well known of as the Vatican to slavs down here. You stupid cunt. This is how much "research" you do with your sewer crawling.
I hope you all read that. :lol:
I read it. What's the problem with that?

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16386

Post by Scented Nectar »

Lsuoma wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
When PZ had a list of who was banned, he got yelled at for it.
:D :D :drool: :D :D
If you mean his "Dungeon", that was laughing , not yelling.
People were PROUD of being there, in many cases.
That's why he changed the listing to say Slymepitters instead of individual names. He did that right after we were laughing about his 'Dungeon' here on the Pit. I had just been toying with the idea of trying on purpose to get my name in there (wouldn't have to try - just be myself!). I remember the coincidental timing of it seeming like maybe it wasn't a coincidence. Then eventually, he just took down the 'Dungeon' completely. I guess it all backfired on him.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16387

Post by Brive1987 »


TedDahlberg
.
.
Posts: 1111
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:08 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16388

Post by TedDahlberg »

TheMudbrooker wrote:
dogen wrote:
Twiglets
Bacon flavor fries
Scampi flavor fries
Custard cremes
Ginger nuts
Pickled eggs
Jellied eels
Mushy peas
Real chocolate (without butyric acid, a major ingredient in vomit and Hershey's)
Pickled eggs unavailable outside the UK?
Clearly you've never been out drinking in Wisconsin (or northern Minnesota or the UP for that matter) nearly every neighborhood tavern has pickled eggs, pickled pork hocks and Blind Robins to munch on. The best ones have pickled heart too.
Pickled toes?

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16389

Post by Brive1987 »

So Randi has stepped down from JREF? Meh.


franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16391

Post by franc »

Southern wrote:
aratina wrote::popcorn:
franc wrote:
You fucking stupid cunt cunt. I even said I had often been there for easter masses. You stupid cunt. The monastery even housed the orthodox southern hemisphere patriarch for some time. The place is as well known of as the Vatican to slavs down here. You stupid cunt. This is how much "research" you do with your sewer crawling.
I hope you all read that. :lol:
I read it. What's the problem with that?
Mistake everyone keeps making is assuming adult comprehension levels from stupid cunts and expecting more than grade school level word games coupled with retarded use of smilies in return.

That's why we are where we are.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16392

Post by Brive1987 »

What happened with the Education Revolution that precipitated Randi unceremoniously kicking DJs butt?

And is JREF still being run out of a sponsors spare office in DC?

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16393

Post by Southern »

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote:So what you are suggesting is that Aratina is aware that Myers is a nasty piece of work and you shouldn't poke him with sticks? It isn't easy to tell through the excess verbiage.
Why not? Because Peezus is scaaaary, wooh, so angry and valliant and...?

Yeah, right. Peezus deserves all the sticks, all sticked up his fat ass. He's the only one on that FTB cesspit I would go out of my way to piss off, just because he's such a little shit. I mean, I like to call Ofie old and ancient and the daughter of the first Pharaoh as much as the next guy, but... at the end of the day, she's just a prudish old lady with not much time left to get angry about them young people having degenerate sex. Peezus is where the money is, all way up his golden, tenured throne, a failure as a scientist, as an atheist, as basically everything.

Well, maybe Trophy Wife likes him thrusting in bed, who knows. There are people with weird fetishes.

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16394

Post by Scented Nectar »

Southern wrote:
SoylentAtheist wrote:I was wondering what was embarrassing about that photo. Little did I consider I should be looking for inadvertent cock-a-likes.

http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/27/george-os ... r-5038051/
Scented Nectar does not approve George Osborne.
Well now, don't get me wrong. Small ones are best for some things. And bigger ones are best for other things. Medium ones, well I guess they are just Jacks of all trades and experts in none! Photogenic-wise in porn, the bigger ones win that category.

tldr; Above and below the waist are totally different stories!
(pun intended)

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16395

Post by Southern »

Brive1987 wrote:What happened with the Education Revolution that precipitated Randi unceremoniously kicking DJs butt?

And is JREF still being run out of a sponsors spare office in DC?
Well, I'm sure they're getting all the support they need from CFI. Right?

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16396

Post by franc »

Brive1987 wrote:So Randi has stepped down from JREF? Meh.
Finally, Becky Watson can step up to the role she so richly deserves.

http://i.imgur.com/RXJGjNL.jpg

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16397

Post by Southern »

franc wrote:
Mistake everyone keeps making is assuming adult comprehension levels from stupid cunts and expecting more than grade school level word games coupled with retarded use of smilies in return.

That's why we are where we are.
I'll do a Michael Nugent and make read Aratina's "point" charitably: maybe these guys aren't anything like the Orthodox Vatican and your analogy is dumb.

Either that, or he thinks that he's outing you as a secret fundie because you interact with religious people without wanting to pull a Peezus on them (stabby stabby stabby!), but that would be stupid, right? Because if that's the case, today before going to work a Jeovah Witness gave me a folder and instead of stabbing her in the guts like a good "happy atheist" would do, I just thanked her and moved with my day. That would make me a fundie!

paddybrown
.
.
Posts: 1728
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16398

Post by paddybrown »

franc wrote:
Southern wrote:
aratina wrote::popcorn:

I hope you all read that. :lol:
I read it. What's the problem with that?
Mistake everyone keeps making is assuming adult comprehension levels from stupid cunts and expecting more than grade school level word games coupled with retarded use of smilies in return.

That's why we are where we are.
We also assume they get the difference between vulgar abuse (which is fair comment, and both gangs engage in) and defamation (which isn't). They don't seem to.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16399

Post by deLurch »

Good call on his part. At 86 years, I don't think he can handle all that he could in his younger days. Best to hand it off now while he is still competent.

Jesper
.
.
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 7:25 pm
Location: Skanderborg, Denmark
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16400

Post by Jesper »

franc wrote:
Brive1987 wrote:So Randi has stepped down from JREF? Meh.
Finally, Becky Watson can step up to the role she so richly deserves.

http://i.imgur.com/RXJGjNL.jpg
Yeah, Dawkins is just as big an ass as PZ.

Connect the dots, idiots.

NEO

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16401

Post by Scented Nectar »

subbie1957 wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I'm going to go out of character here for a second and make some observations about Gabriel's appearance:

Alex Gabriel has one of the most punchable faces in the world. It's a face I would punch. It's a face a mother would punch. It doesn't help him one inch that he's such an ass.

Ok, not his fault he's got such a schnoz. Could happen to anyone. Neither is it his fault that his eyebrows look like two huge dead caterpillars (although things can be done about that). But to wear those fucking hipster glasses on top of all that? Glasses that, combined with the rest, summon an uneasy feeling of him trying the old Groucho Marx joke-look? Plus his clown outfits? It's borderline criminal, and all his own fault.

Oh, and about being an ass, it's a face I'm quiet certain a grandmother would punch (yes, I still remember that one).

That was my angry rant for the morning. Thanks for your attendance. Try the waitress, tip the veal.
Is that his real appearance?

In all honesty, I thought it was a fake picture, to hide his real identity, or as a bit of an in-joke.
He's got a youtube channel with 3 videos at https://www.youtube.com/user/MisterAlexGabriel/videos His channel icon looks almost normal if you ignore the crazed look. He should really avoid the fashions that make him look like the love child of Ronald McDonald and Groucho Marx like on his blog picture.

Guest

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16402

Post by Guest »

James Caruthers wrote:I need some pointy tits and also some tips on playing this Magic game I hear the cool virgins play these days. I will play Black of course because I am a rough man. Demons because why not, Chaos is your master now.

So teach me about these card games, turbonerds. What is a "land" and how many do I need before I can own Park Place and Broadway and summon Satan? Maybe Raep can help with that last part.
Chaos is a red trait, shitsnack.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16403

Post by Southern »

James Caruthers wrote:I need some pointy tits and also some tips on playing this Magic game I hear the cool virgins play these days. I will play Black of course because I am a rough man. Demons because why not, Chaos is your master now.

So teach me about these card games, turbonerds. What is a "land" and how many do I need before I can own Park Place and Broadway and summon Satan? Maybe Raep can help with that last part.
A "land", on a Magic: the Gathering context, is a piece of paper with a scenic picture drawn over it. They can be either cheap, or cost hundreds of dollars each. I really wish I had money back in 1995, so I could be rich today.

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16404

Post by Scented Nectar »

Southern wrote:
franc wrote:
Mistake everyone keeps making is assuming adult comprehension levels from stupid cunts and expecting more than grade school level word games coupled with retarded use of smilies in return.

That's why we are where we are.
I'll do a Michael Nugent and make read Aratina's "point" charitably: maybe these guys aren't anything like the Orthodox Vatican and your analogy is dumb.

Either that, or he thinks that he's outing you as a secret fundie because you interact with religious people without wanting to pull a Peezus on them (stabby stabby stabby!), but that would be stupid, right? Because if that's the case, today before going to work a Jeovah Witness gave me a folder and instead of stabbing her in the guts like a good "happy atheist" would do, I just thanked her and moved with my day. That would make me a fundie!
I'm not going to converse with Ratty. He will almost always respond as though you've said something completely different than what you actually said, and he avoids any points you hope him to address. It's like talking to an overly stupid brick wall. Pointless. Very much like what Dawkins recently said about people on Tumblr misunderstanding things all the time. I think most ftb commentors and bloggers are like that. Their comprehension levels are non-existent.

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16405

Post by franc »

Scented Nectar wrote:I'm not going to converse with Ratty. He will almost always respond as though you've said something completely different than what you actually said, and he avoids any points you hope him to address. It's like talking to an overly stupid brick wall. Pointless. Very much like what Dawkins recently said about people on Tumblr misunderstanding things all the time. I think most ftb commentors and bloggers are like that. Their comprehension levels are non-existent.
I just like calling him a stupid cunt. Because that's what it says on the label.

The conversation level is really that of arguing with an ADHD ridden 12 year old. Always reminds me of a kid like that who is tormenting his sister by slapping her, getting yelled at by mom to stop it - so he then starts poking her instead. "But I did what you said mom!!!" - that is what trying to talk to any of the baboons is like.

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4740
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16406

Post by another lurker »

They don't want to comprehend. They want to shame. They want to troll. And its ok if they behave like petulant children, because everything that is good and right and pure is on their side.

Lying for Jesus, indeed.

Tribble
.
.
Posts: 5102
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16407

Post by Tribble »

HunnyBunny wrote:
subbie1957 wrote:
Alex Gabriel thought the producer of a programme was trolling about his own programme? That Lambert didn't know what his own programme contained?

Alex really had to work hard to reach those levels of stupidity.
To clarify, Guy Lambert is a BBC producer and supporter of Russel T Davies. Davies is the ex- Dr Who producer / writer, and now Producer of Cucumber.

Lambert at least tried to engage Alex Gabriel, and seemed genuinely interested in discussing his views. Alex, of course, wasn't. He was right, Lambert was wrong. Not that Guy was holding a different subjective opinion of possible equal validity, just wrong, end of discussion. In a nutshell what I find so dislikable about the SJW cult, along with all religions, no room for acceptance of subjective viewpoints.
You're seeing, with Gabriel (and the vast majority of the SJWs) the end result of Black-White thinking. Black-White thinking is, basically, a product of bad parenting that leads to arrested emotional development in a child and is a key component of personality disorders such as narcissistic, borderline and avoidant (or whatever they call them in DSM-5). Many, if not most, do grow out of it and eventually mature, which is why loud, obnoxious social-movements like the current SJW 'thing' are mostly populated by young people who are constantly falling into that world-view only to 'grow out of it' later and (frankly) tend to end up being embarrassed about the whole situation.

But with the hard-core, life-long SJW types, they remain stuck. Often in some sort of emotionally-stunted, buy philosophically opposed world-view of the ones that damaged them. Myers is a classic case. He's been more than clear to the contempt he has for his critical and abusive father and grandfather and their conservative world-views. So he became critical and abusive but with extremist liberal world-views.

What I think is more interesting in all this (at least to me) is that Myers may have enough symptoms to be classified with a low-grade avoidant personality disorder. It would explain a lot about the things he has shared about his life and many of his behaviors (internet, flaming warrior but meek and socially awkward man-child in public). Personally, I think he should see a psychologist and try to get straightened out and stop spending his life trying to be as big an asshole as his father and grandfather.

BTW, for the multiple people who are currently trolling/lurking, these are qualifiers:

may have enough
could very well be

It's how adults tell other adults they're trying to discuss complex issues and are speculating on how the facts may paint a certain picture while trying to reach conclusions based on the facts and not some 2-year-old emotional state. And get some therapy. You clowns certainly need it.

And, no , I'm not nice about it as I've had my fill of being polite and compassionate and dancing around the collective mental and emotional problems they take out on others. Here is a clue: If you've been married and divorced 7 times your ex-spouses aren't the problem, you're the problem. And this carries to the Internet, that is if you have this many problems with this many people -- YOU ARE MOST LIKELY THE COMMON DENOMINATOR AND SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM.

Tribble
.
.
Posts: 5102
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16408

Post by Tribble »

Southern wrote:
franc wrote:
Mistake everyone keeps making is assuming adult comprehension levels from stupid cunts and expecting more than grade school level word games coupled with retarded use of smilies in return.

That's why we are where we are.
I'll do a Michael Nugent and make read Aratina's "point" charitably: maybe these guys aren't anything like the Orthodox Vatican and your analogy is dumb.

Either that, or he thinks that he's outing you as a secret fundie because you interact with religious people without wanting to pull a Peezus on them (stabby stabby stabby!), but that would be stupid, right? Because if that's the case, today before going to work a Jeovah Witness gave me a folder and instead of stabbing her in the guts like a good "happy atheist" would do, I just thanked her and moved with my day. That would make me a fundie!
Even as an atheist I went to church well into my late 40s. I happened to like the socialization aspects of it. And the singing. And, of course, it was very entertaining watching these people, especially when I'd go to the charismatic churches and they'd pretend to speak in tongues or 'translate' the meaningless psudo-Russian*.

* I swear, every time I heard someone 'speak in tongues' it sounded like badly done movie-Russian. Worse, speaking in tongues was supposed to be in real languages so that real people who didn't speak Hebrew could understand what the apostles were saying and could, therefore, spread the word of Jesus to non-Jews. Making modern speaking in tongues double phony.

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16409

Post by franc »


Dave
.
.
Posts: 1975
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:03 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16410

Post by Dave »

aratina wrote:
franc wrote:
aratina wrote:Apparently, the newest myth is that franc assumed the identity of this other guy and then went around for years telling everyone he was this other guy (which there is proof of), and now this other guy is dying of cancer and all the people franc fucked with are bashing not franc but this other guy because franc assumed the identity of the this other guy. I'll be interested in hearing the new twists this legend takes as franc tries to find a way to blame everyone else again. :popcorn:
You stupid cunt. I explained what you idiots did in basic english and even showed where you did it - you, or one of your monkey-see-monkey-do idiots that ape your idiocy - prank called someone in a large retirement village associated with an orthodox monastery. Yes you idiots did. It is a place I know quite well as does anyone else with roots tracing back to various slavic refugee streams.
:lol: :lol: :popcorn:

P.S. Does he know because he goes to church there?
You know, in general, I think franc is ass with delusions of grandeur, IOW, I am fairly sympathetic to anyone arguing with him.

Despite that, I have no idea what point you think you are making here.

Dave
.
.
Posts: 1975
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:03 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16411

Post by Dave »

aratina wrote:
franc wrote:
aratina wrote:Apparently, the newest myth is that franc assumed the identity of this other guy and then went around for years telling everyone he was this other guy (which there is proof of), and now this other guy is dying of cancer and all the people franc fucked with are bashing not franc but this other guy because franc assumed the identity of the this other guy. I'll be interested in hearing the new twists this legend takes as franc tries to find a way to blame everyone else again. :popcorn:
You stupid cunt. I explained what you idiots did in basic english and even showed where you did it - you, or one of your monkey-see-monkey-do idiots that ape your idiocy - prank called someone in a large retirement village associated with an orthodox monastery. Yes you idiots did. It is a place I know quite well as does anyone else with roots tracing back to various slavic refugee streams.
:lol: :lol: :popcorn:

P.S. Does he know because he goes to church there?
You know, in general, I think franc is ass with delusions of grandeur, IOW, I am fairly sympathetic to anyone arguing with him.

Despite that, I have no idea what point you think you are making here.

Dave
.
.
Posts: 1975
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:03 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16412

Post by Dave »

aratina wrote:
franc wrote:
aratina wrote:Apparently, the newest myth is that franc assumed the identity of this other guy and then went around for years telling everyone he was this other guy (which there is proof of), and now this other guy is dying of cancer and all the people franc fucked with are bashing not franc but this other guy because franc assumed the identity of the this other guy. I'll be interested in hearing the new twists this legend takes as franc tries to find a way to blame everyone else again. :popcorn:
You stupid cunt. I explained what you idiots did in basic english and even showed where you did it - you, or one of your monkey-see-monkey-do idiots that ape your idiocy - prank called someone in a large retirement village associated with an orthodox monastery. Yes you idiots did. It is a place I know quite well as does anyone else with roots tracing back to various slavic refugee streams.
:lol: :lol: :popcorn:

P.S. Does he know because he goes to church there?
You know, in general, I think franc is ass with delusions of grandeur, IOW, I am fairly sympathetic to anyone arguing with him.

Despite that, I have no idea what point you think you are making here.

Dave
.
.
Posts: 1975
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:03 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16413

Post by Dave »

aratina wrote:
franc wrote:
aratina wrote:Apparently, the newest myth is that franc assumed the identity of this other guy and then went around for years telling everyone he was this other guy (which there is proof of), and now this other guy is dying of cancer and all the people franc fucked with are bashing not franc but this other guy because franc assumed the identity of the this other guy. I'll be interested in hearing the new twists this legend takes as franc tries to find a way to blame everyone else again. :popcorn:
You stupid cunt. I explained what you idiots did in basic english and even showed where you did it - you, or one of your monkey-see-monkey-do idiots that ape your idiocy - prank called someone in a large retirement village associated with an orthodox monastery. Yes you idiots did. It is a place I know quite well as does anyone else with roots tracing back to various slavic refugee streams.
:lol: :lol: :popcorn:

P.S. Does he know because he goes to church there?
You know, in general, I think franc is ass with delusions of grandeur, IOW, I am fairly sympathetic to anyone arguing with him.

Despite that, I have no idea what point you think you are making here.

Dave
.
.
Posts: 1975
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:03 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16414

Post by Dave »

DaFuq?

I swear I only press submit once.

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4740
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16415

Post by another lurker »

Dave wrote:DaFuq?

I swear I only press submit once.
Delusions of grandeur.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16416

Post by Skep tickle »

Phrasing at end of Randi's letter suggests this could be the last TAM. (Alternatively, could just mean the last one for him.)

Shatterface as Guest

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16417

Post by Shatterface as Guest »

subbie1957 wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
subbie1957 wrote: Alex really had to work hard to reach those levels of stupidity.
I'm not so sure about that. I think he's a natural.
No, there has been serious re-programming of his brain.

Apparently , it is rape even if there is no intercourse.

Gabriel , in his own blog post, has to say that he presumed intercourse had happened.

You can't accuse people of something that only happened in your imagination.
Seems this scene has split people into two different camps of stupid:

(a) It's rape. The young guy is pissed as a fart, the black guy has sex with him, therefore rape.

(b) We don't actually see the black guy's dick up his arse. They're both naked, we've seen the black guy with his hands down the young guy's pants, we hear them humping but we don't actually see dick up arse action therefore no rape.

The third alternative, (c) that they have sex but it isn't rape because drunk people fuck all the time isn't on the table.

How many people arguing about this actually watched the fucking programme? Or are actually familiar with Russell T Davies work as a whole?

Shatterface

Jesper
.
.
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 7:25 pm
Location: Skanderborg, Denmark
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16418

Post by Jesper »

Once again.

You lot are fucked without my help.

Fact.

Next target at FTB: Ophelia Benson.

NEO

Billie from Ockham
.
.
Posts: 5470
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:40 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16419

Post by Billie from Ockham »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:The number of lands in your deck is limited, but I don't know what the rules about that are these days.
The only rule on "how many lands" is the general rule that says no more than four of a given card that isn't a basic land. 99% of people run 22-24 lands in 60-card Standard. But if he is going to run mono-black, the number of lands is irrelevant, because he's going to get his ass kicked every time. The only mono with any chance right now is red.

Billie from Ockham
.
.
Posts: 5470
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:40 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16420

Post by Billie from Ockham »

James Caruthers wrote:assburglars is one of the great misunderstood conditions of our time
Especially when they break and enter before stealing, sending Lsuoma to the emergency room.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16421

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Jesper wrote:Once again.

You lot are fucked without my help.

Fact.

Next target at FTB: Ophelia Benson.

NEO
Dude! You read my mind! Don't bother with the turnips posting here. They'll never understand you like I do. For a while I thought you were posting nonsense but then it all came to me like an epiphany. I have finally worked out what you're getting at and it's going to be GLORIOUS. Sorry for doubting you. Check your PM's.
The fire rises.

Shatterface as Guest

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16422

Post by Shatterface as Guest »

Anyone who is familiar with Russell T Davies' work will know he has frequently courted controversy. There's a scene in the first episode of Queer as Folk where Nathan (Charlie Hunnam), who is supposed to be 15, gets fucked by Stewart (Aidan Gillen) who is supposed to be 30. That's technically statutory rape. It's not a subtle sequence either because Nathan comes prematurely and Stewart flicks his jizz back at him.

In a later episode Stewart says he lost his virginity in the showers at school when his gym teacher fucked him. Again, that's rape, and in real life the teacher would be jailed if he was caught.

Characters throughout the series have drunken sex, they take drugs and have sex, one has an overdose and the guy he's with just fucks off and doesn't call an ambulance. They have sex with prostitutes, they watch porn, they call each other 'cunt', they do all kinds of stuff SJ Warriors would disapprove of if they weren't gay.

But Davies is gay and his liberal fans have to pretend that he's politically correct. They have to believe that Davies agrees with them that drunken sex is rape so they have to pretend sex didn't happen. The idea that the middle aged black guy and the young white guy just sat around the bedroom naked, despite last being seen kissing and groping each other, while the other guy wandered the streets for god knows how long is ridiculous.

Shatterface

Jesper
.
.
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 7:25 pm
Location: Skanderborg, Denmark
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16423

Post by Jesper »

Tony Parsehole wrote:
Jesper wrote:Once again.

You lot are fucked without my help.

Fact.

Next target at FTB: Ophelia Benson.

NEO
Dude! You read my mind! Don't bother with the turnips posting here. They'll never understand you like I do. For a while I thought you were posting nonsense but then it all came to me like an epiphany. I have finally worked out what you're getting at and it's going to be GLORIOUS. Sorry for doubting you. Check your PM's.
The fire rises.
Fucking awesome, Tony.

You're in. 8-)

But I have to wait to read PM's.

Too many moles, atm.

Stay fucking cool, Brother.

NEO

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16424

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Jesper wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
Jesper wrote:Once again.

You lot are fucked without my help.

Fact.

Next target at FTB: Ophelia Benson.

NEO
Dude! You read my mind! Don't bother with the turnips posting here. They'll never understand you like I do. For a while I thought you were posting nonsense but then it all came to me like an epiphany. I have finally worked out what you're getting at and it's going to be GLORIOUS. Sorry for doubting you. Check your PM's.
The fire rises.
Fucking awesome, Tony.

You're in. 8-)

But I have to wait to read PM's.

Too many moles, atm.

Stay fucking cool, Brother.

NEO
I am in, Brother. I am primed and I am holding the blue touchpaper awaiting your call.
We have lit a fire. The fire rises.

Guest

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16425

Post by Guest »

Jesper, I want to try something real quick...

please post as a guest without identifying yourself

I want to see if the sheeple are getting pissy about your words, or just your name.

Jesper
.
.
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 7:25 pm
Location: Skanderborg, Denmark
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16426

Post by Jesper »

No deal.

I smell traps from afar.

There is nothing to celebrate.

There is only Death.

NEO

Shatterface as Guest

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16427

Post by Shatterface as Guest »

Davies can be seen talking about the threesome scene in Cucumber here:

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/Cucu ... cenes-ep-1

It's based on a real event involving a friend of Davies.

Shatterface

Jesper
.
.
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 7:25 pm
Location: Skanderborg, Denmark
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16428

Post by Jesper »

Back to work, guys'n gals.

Ophelia.

What is her weakness?

Take a guess and I'll return with the answer shortly.

NEO

windy
.
.
Posts: 2140
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:41 am
Location: Tom of Finland-land

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16429

Post by windy »

franc wrote:
Dworkins Unplugged. wrote: Feminism happened, a narrative was constructed in which women promoted the idea of wanting men to be more like "women" (meaning whining middle class feminists with egos larger than their abilities). This narrative permeated throughout media enclaves (the only places feminists seem to be able to work in without making an exhibition of themselves) and more importantly marketing and advertisers saw a niche market to develop. After almost 50 years it's hardly a surprise that many young men think being both "hip" and attractive to women means reducing all masculine signals and behaviours, to whine endlessly on phones about how unfair life is.
It probably explains why so many blokes in their late 20's to mid 40's have said fuck that and instead get stoned and spend their days on their games consoles, or go get "swole".
All of that is self-evident. But the social engineering seems to have permeated through on a genetic level. It's like a gene pool that wants to kill itself.
Maybe the genes know something you don't?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2561 ... t=Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
Equality between partners is considering a feature of the functional partnerships in westernized societies. However, the evolutionary consequences of how in-pair hierarchy influences reproduction are less known. Attraction of some high-ranking women towards low-ranking men represents a puzzle.
METHODS:
Young urban adults (120 men, 171 women) filled out a questionnaire focused on their sexual preference for higher or lower ranking partners, their future in-pair hierarchy, and hierarchy between their parents.
RESULTS:
Human pairs with a hierarchic disparity between partners conceive more offspring than pairs of equally-ranking individuals, who, in turn, conceive more offspring than pairs of two dominating partners. Importantly, the higher reproductive success of hierarchically disparate pairs holds, regardless of which sex, male or female, is the dominant one. In addition, the subjects preferring hierarchy disparity in partnerships were with greater probability sexually aroused by such disparity, suggesting that both the partnership preference and the triggers of sexual arousal may reflect a mating strategy.
...though I have to say that result looks a bit fishy. I'd like to see how they got "reproductive success" out of a questionnaire to "young urban adults" (who are probably still at the start of their reproductive careers).

Old_ones
.
.
Posts: 2168
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:46 pm
Location: An hour's drive from Hell.

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16430

Post by Old_ones »

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote:
I especially loved the way Oolon oozed his way onto the BBC to explain how the block list is a jolly jape and how much fun was had by all. No question of trying to smear anyone on it, was there? Getting Twitter accounts suspended, what a larff! Some people just don't appreciate a bit of humour. You rape-supporting misogynist harasser, you.

You [aratina] are either trolling, or you really are the most clueless, one-eyed rationalising prick on the planet.
I don't think he is trolling. His comments remind me of some of the metal forums on myspace I used to hang out in about 12 years ago. Specifically, we'd occasionally draw these moronic youth minister types who came to preach to us without having any idea who we were or what we thought about religion. The important thing to these people was to save us from our atheism/satanism/metalfandom or whatever, and not to legitimize it by trying to understand it.

Aratina isn't here for a dialogue, he's here to give us "things to consider" in the hopes that one day some of the the seeds he plants will grow, and a few of us will rediscover the light of Peezus. He doesn't think people with the aims that he and Peezus have w.r.t. social justice can ever be faulted for the way they advance those aims, so any criticisms we might level at them are just irrelevant heresy. Never mind the fact that he has to resort to comparing Peezus to a vicious animal in order to defend his smears and doxing. The important thing is that we eventually 'wake up' and give Peezus a pass on it, and learn to take our lashes in stride if and when they come to us.

So anyway, I think he has an actual purpose here, and he looks clueless because having a clue is unimportant to his purpose.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16431

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:So, that's how an ignored poster looks like? Fancy!
I know, it's just like putting on mosquito repellent, isn't it? I only wonder why I waited so long.

Jesper
.
.
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 7:25 pm
Location: Skanderborg, Denmark
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16432

Post by Jesper »

Too slow.

Here it is.

PZ Myers is a Satanist and she fears him.

She was given a direct order to become the white female Charlie Hebdo defender on FTB.

Look at Ed, and connect the dots.

NEO

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4740
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16433

Post by another lurker »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:So, that's how an ignored poster looks like? Fancy!
I know, it's just like putting on mosquito repellent, isn't it? I only wonder why I waited so long.

He is not on my ignore as of yet. If he really is suffering from delusions I feel very sad for him.

It can't be pleasant, and he is making an ass of himself across the web.

Billie from Ockham
.
.
Posts: 5470
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:40 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16434

Post by Billie from Ockham »

windy wrote:...though I have to say that result looks a bit fishy. I'd like to see how they got "reproductive success" out of a questionnaire to "young urban adults" (who are probably still at the start of their reproductive careers).
Maybe a snippet from the transcript of an interview with one of the "young urban adults" will help explain it:

"No, bitch, I ain't wearing no condom!"

Jesper
.
.
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 7:25 pm
Location: Skanderborg, Denmark
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16435

Post by Jesper »

PZ Myers. Humanist of the year 2009.

Revel in him or perish.

Ophelia, no matter what you do or say, it's too late.

I gave you an olive branch.

Now sit on it and burn, you sleazy little bitch.

NEO

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16436

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

another lurker wrote:

He is not on my ignore as of yet. If he really is suffering from delusions I feel very sad for him.

It can't be pleasant, and he is making an ass of himself across the web.
I was extremely hesitant about putting him on my ignore list. It's a feature I have never used before, because I think everyone should have their say. But Jasper is not having his say, he's trolling as hard as he can, and not in a funny way. His "ahahaha, I am so great, you're all dead, PZ is gone, Benson comes next" bullshit is really borderline Mabuse/Markuze.

I tried to have a calm discussion with M/M once. It didn't end well.

Anyway, I like the little band that states he's posted something. I can even click on it to see his comments, but at least I don't have to withstand his bullshit if I don't want to. Way better than scrolling.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16437

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Dave wrote:DaFuq?

I swear I only press submit once.
Way to hog the page, Dave.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16438

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Southern wrote:Ed Brayton maybe could use the extra revenue, but Peez? He's very comfortable with his tenured life, I don't think he really craves for the money. What he wants is power, to have his voice relevant once again, since he screwed the chance he had.
Peez craves adulation. He failed to get it as a scientist, failed as the author of an orthodoxy-shattering treatise on evolution, failed as a leader of movement atheism. He is getting it (from his Horde at least) as a panderer of SJW agitprop and exhorter of cultish hatred. And he's addicted to it.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16439

Post by Southern »

Confirmed: Jesper is another Parsehole's sock.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: How 'bout them Hawks!?

#16440

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Southern wrote:Ed Brayton maybe could use the extra revenue, but Peez? He's very comfortable with his tenured life, I don't think he really craves for the money. What he wants is power, to have his voice relevant once again, since he screwed the chance he had.
Peez craves adulation. He failed to get it as a scientist, failed as the author of an orthodoxy-shattering treatise on evolution, failed as a leader of movement atheism. He is getting it (from his Horde at least) as a panderer of SJW agitprop and exhorter of cultish hatred. And he's addicted to it.
While I think you are both pretty spot-on in most respects, I wouldn't entirely discount the money. Didn't he mention once he made around $50k? That's not a lot of money.

Locked