Sunder wrote:The thing about Glenn that has people in a tizzy at the moment is that once upon a time she pissed off SJWs (despite formerly being PZ Myers Youtube darling for a short while) and now they're wetting their pants over an opportunity to paint the other side as being just as bad as dudes like Werleman and Avicenna.
Even though the response from non-SJWs has mostly been "she absolutely deserves this."
Even though Werleman and Avicenna were serial plagiarists who got away with their shit for years whereas Glenn seems to have been caught immediately on her first attempt.
Three points and an addendum:
1. Yes, she was a chip in the SJW wars. Myers deployed her. She wasn't controllable. He then hated her. Dawkins, at one point, was endorsing her (at least via twitter).
2. They've been gunning for her for a long time. But she's been pretty smart and not played into their hands.
3. She got a bit lazy and did, in a minor form, what Avicenna and Werlemann were doing on a daily/weekly basis. That means she's 'worse than them' because she's an enemy-of-goodness while they 'made regrettable mistakes' but were 'fighting for the cause.'
Also, FWIW, there's a shit-ton of plagiarism on YouTube. From ideas and layouts all the way to ripping-off entire videos. SJW HERO Sarkeesian is among the worst of them, constantly ripping off other videos, directly reading from Wikipedia (seriously, directly, word-for-word) and other sources, and stealing every single thought in her videos from other sources. ALl of which makes her completely unoriginal and a plagiarist thief. Yet it's ok when she does it.
Point is, YouTube is YouTube and for anyone who is a vlogger on YouTube to grouse about plagiarism needs to make sure their hands are clean. This would include people like Watson, who has spent a lot of time ripping off others to produce her stunningly unoriginal material. And the fact this is the only one, unlike Sarkeesian, Watson, etc., is really small potatoes in my book. Not worth the tempest in a Tea Pot.