Not really. For one thing, if you'd actually read my argument instead of peddling and attempting to thrash a strawman you would notice my more or less hypothetical defense of the term "nigger" was in support of the analogy that it is no better, and no worse, than "cunt" and other similar epithets.Oglebart wrote:Here you go Steers. This is from the FAQ of the Creativity Movement site, This could be for you.
Well, fancy that.25. Why do you use the term "niggers" in your book instead of showing some respect for the blacks and calling them "negroes" instead?
A. This is a deliberate choice of words. As we state on page 49 in NATURE'S ETERNAL RELIGION, if we are for White Racial supremacy then we must stop giving them credit and respect which they did not earn, do not deserve, and never did. Again, it is very strange, that the same people who are so affronted by the niggers not getting their "proper respect" are totally unconcerned about the vicious, unwarranted attacks by the niggers and other mud races upon the White Race and will not lift a finger in the defense of their own kind. They seem to deem it quite proper that the niggers should be loyal to their race, the Jews should be loyal to their race, but when the White Man is asked to show a loyalty to his own race, he is immediately denounced, even by members of his own race, as being a racist, a bigot, a Nazi, and many other derogatory smear words that the Jews have concocted. .....
And, for another, the Creativity position seems pretty much the obverse or antithesis of my position as they rather clearly insist on applying the term to all black people, whereas I have said repeatedly that such use is, ipso facto, racist.
You might want to consider taking your thumb off the scales if not your whole arm.