The Refuge of the Toads

Old subthreads
Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2281

Post by Steersman »

Oglebart wrote:Here you go Steers. This is from the FAQ of the Creativity Movement site, This could be for you.
25. Why do you use the term "niggers" in your book instead of showing some respect for the blacks and calling them "negroes" instead?

A. This is a deliberate choice of words. As we state on page 49 in NATURE'S ETERNAL RELIGION, if we are for White Racial supremacy then we must stop giving them credit and respect which they did not earn, do not deserve, and never did. Again, it is very strange, that the same people who are so affronted by the niggers not getting their "proper respect" are totally unconcerned about the vicious, unwarranted attacks by the niggers and other mud races upon the White Race and will not lift a finger in the defense of their own kind. They seem to deem it quite proper that the niggers should be loyal to their race, the Jews should be loyal to their race, but when the White Man is asked to show a loyalty to his own race, he is immediately denounced, even by members of his own race, as being a racist, a bigot, a Nazi, and many other derogatory smear words that the Jews have concocted. .....
Well, fancy that.
Not really. For one thing, if you'd actually read my argument instead of peddling and attempting to thrash a strawman you would notice my more or less hypothetical defense of the term "nigger" was in support of the analogy that it is no better, and no worse, than "cunt" and other similar epithets.

And, for another, the Creativity position seems pretty much the obverse or antithesis of my position as they rather clearly insist on applying the term to all black people, whereas I have said repeatedly that such use is, ipso facto, racist.

You might want to consider taking your thumb off the scales if not your whole arm.

Eskarina
.
.
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 12:55 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2282

Post by Eskarina »

Creativity73 wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:Am I going mad or is one of our new arrivals advocating for Sharia?
You are going mad. The argument was about crime statistics and whether they were going to keep going up in the future in the west. *Sigh* this reminds me of how the SJWs just jump to the conclusion people like Richard Dawkins or Sargon or Thunderf00t are advocating violence against women. I simply postulated that regretably the future for the west looks like the Muslims will take over. So now you all have decided that I am a Muslim. Also because I suggested that cutting off people's hands for theft probably meant they have a lower crime level. People may be trolling me but look as if they interpret that that I actually WANT that to happen. Are you guys for real?

Go on tell me how I love Sharia again. :clap:
You fail to recognise the similarity between the absolutism of Sharia and your "Weltanschauung", for want of a better word. No matter the content, it's the absolutism that counts. Do you really think the average pitter is too daft to see through your "reasoning"?

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2283

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Hey, you guys scared off the white supremacist chicky-boo. Shame on you. All she wanted to do was recruit us for her batshit cult. C'mon, it might have been fun, pumping out them babies. Maybe a softball league, picnics, fathering 'lil white race warriors with hot neo-nazi chicks. But now she's gone, scared away from spreading her lovably insane dogma. When will we learn to accept dogmatic, authoritarian views without question? Why must we drive away those that simply want to impose unscientific ideologies on society?

I weep for us. Also, my beer is out of reach. Tears, many tears.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2284

Post by deLurch »

Creativity73 wrote:I simply postulated that regretably the future for the west looks like the Muslims will take over.
A melting pot solution is strong possible outcome.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2285

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Eskarina wrote:. Do you really think the average pitter is too daft to see through your "reasoning"?
I might be, as any fool can plainly see.

Eskarina
.
.
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 12:55 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2286

Post by Eskarina »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Eskarina wrote:. Do you really think the average pitter is too daft to see through your "reasoning"?
I might be, as any fool can plainly see.
There's still hope left that she didn't leave. She claims to be from Engerland where it's still early, and she has to look after all those babbys first.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2287

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Eskarina wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Eskarina wrote:. Do you really think the average pitter is too daft to see through your "reasoning"?
I might be, as any fool can plainly see.
There's still hope left that she didn't leave. She claims to be from Engerland where it's still early, and she has to look after all those babbys first.
Only her fit babies should survive. In a pit, into which raw meat* is thrown. The strongest will persevere. Fit warriors for a savage society.

*No dark meat, obviously.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2288

Post by deLurch »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:Only her fit babies should survive. In a pit, into which raw meat* is thrown. The strongest will persevere. Fit warriors for a savage society.

*No dark meat, obviously.
The refugees just made it to England. Give it a year before she pounds out a mixed race baby.

gurugeorge
.
.
Posts: 820
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 4:39 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2289

Post by gurugeorge »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
2) AFAICT, gurugeorge has determined that alien races do exist, so we should follow creativity_lebensborn33's lead and start outbreeding the aliens before they get here.
They're never going to get here, nobody's ever going to get here. There's no Singularity, there's only the Great Filter. There's probably about 2 species in the whole galaxy who have ever gone beyond our level, all the others fell to a tidal wave of shit mind-virus epidemics analogous to ChristianSocJusIslamism, like we're going to if we don't pull our fucking logical socks up.

DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND??!!??!!!

*runs for the hills*

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2290

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

deLurch wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:Only her fit babies should survive. In a pit, into which raw meat* is thrown. The strongest will persevere. Fit warriors for a savage society.

*No dark meat, obviously.
The refugees just made it to England. Give it a year before she pounds out a mixed race baby.
I doubt her pure, lily white body would accept impure seed. Only the finest scrappings of Hitler's panties for her.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2291

Post by deLurch »

Bundles of joy
[youtube]XvVnMSQ7rVg[/youtube]

Eskarina
.
.
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 12:55 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2292

Post by Eskarina »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Eskarina wrote:There's still hope left that she didn't leave. She claims to be from Engerland where it's still early, and she has to look after all those babbys first.
Only her fit babies should survive. In a pit, into which raw meat* is thrown. The strongest will persevere. Fit warriors for a savage society.

*No dark meat, obviously.
Raw pork. That will eliminate any Jewish and Muslim tendencies in the little tykes.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2293

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

gurugeorge wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
2) AFAICT, gurugeorge has determined that alien races do exist, so we should follow creativity_lebensborn33's lead and start outbreeding the aliens before they get here.
They're never going to get here, nobody's ever going to get here. There's no Singularity, there's only the Great Filter. There's probably about 2 species in the whole galaxy who have ever gone beyond our level, all the others fell to a tidal wave of shit mind-virus epidemics analogous to ChristianSocJusIslamism, like we're going to if we don't pull our fucking logical socks up.

DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND??!!??!!!

*runs for the hills*
Son, you a 'merican? You go get yerself a gun. A big 'un, with a magazine capacity large enough to exterminate a clan of ninjas. Sit yerself on yer porch, with yer guns, a bottle of corn squeezins' and you can just double-dog dare 'em to try it. Make yer day.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2294

Post by Steersman »

deLurch wrote:
Steersman wrote:I think it's kind of hard to argue against the claim that, as others have more or less agreed, chopping off hands for theft is likely to reduce the incidence of that crime. Not that that justifies that particular punishment, just that that is a reasonable inference as to its effect: the "is-ought" issue.
It is not proven that the punishment reduces that crime. However, I would expect it to be extremely effective in reducing the recidivism rate of those punished in that way.
Exactly. Though I don't find it entirely implausible that such punishments - particularly if "seen to be done" - would have a dampening effect on others. As I think the apocryphal (?) story, that someone told here recently, about the wallet full of money left in the middle of the street in Saudi Arabia - given that they too may support the "possession is nine tenths of the law", I certainly would be apprehensive about being found even holding something I wasn't entitled to.
deLurch wrote:That said, you bring up a good point about the cure being worse than the disease. That is what I think about the war on pot in the US. Someone gets a conviction, and suddenly they have more trouble finding gainful employment. And it disproportionately affects the black population of the US. It just isn't worth it or a little bit of pot.
Indeed. Maybe a moot point on where or on what issues to draw the line for prohibition - prohibiting child abuse: good; prohibiting pot: bad; prohibiting contract killers: good; prohibiting alcohol or prostitution or gambling: bad - but the evidence, particularly on pot and alcohol and drugs in general, is that, as you suggest, the cure is very frequently worse than the disease. That is maybe somewhat academic if one happens to be the victim or the relative of a victim run over by a drunk driver but, in looking at the sum total of the grief caused by many such prohibitions, it's hard not to reflect on the wisdom of that analogy. And on the conjecture that America, in particular though not exclusively, is driven by a rather problematic and odious Old Testament morality.

But you might be interested in this book (PDF, maybe not respecting the copyright) on Prohibitions that I ran across on "Maggie McNeill's" site (The Honest Courtesan) who has been rather vocal and impassioned about the odious effects of that morality in the context of prostitution.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2295

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Eskarina wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Eskarina wrote:There's still hope left that she didn't leave. She claims to be from Engerland where it's still early, and she has to look after all those babbys first.
Only her fit babies should survive. In a pit, into which raw meat* is thrown. The strongest will persevere. Fit warriors for a savage society.

*No dark meat, obviously.
Raw pork. That will eliminate any Jewish and Muslim tendencies in the little tykes.
Plus, they will develop an immunity to trichinosis. But they will have to be wormed.

Eskarina
.
.
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 12:55 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2296

Post by Eskarina »

deLurch wrote:Bundles of joy
[youtube]XvVnMSQ7rVg[/youtube]
http://i.imgur.com/8SxNMbm.jpg

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2297

Post by Skep tickle »

BTW, could someone who has a tumblr account - or wouldn't mind getting one - sign up to follow "womeninsecularism" for updates on CFI's 4th go at a WiS conference, then announce any updates here?

According to http://womeninsecularism.org/ the conference is being planned for Sept 23 to 25, 2016; see upper right corner for the "Follow" button.

It seems moderately likely that Robyn Blumner, the new CEO of CFI since its merger with RDFRS, will be there. It'll be interesting to see who (who else) is speaking.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2298

Post by comhcinc »

Quiet every one. I am trying to sleep.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2299

Post by Ape+lust »

Brive1987 wrote:For Ape shooping may never be the same ....

http://i.imgur.com/t6fFsye.jpg
HAHA! Years ago he labelled images "Created with GIMP", but hid the phrase in alt text where it was less likely to be seen. Now he's brave enough to be able-ist out loud? In front of the Horde? Good luck with that, Peez.

I dunno if I believe him, anyway. He already knows Photoshop. Photoshop proficiency is hard. GIMP proficiency is harder. He's going to take the hard way as a matter of principle?

Sure.

http://imgur.com/0j1lxr0.jpg

I'm in a celebratory mood (was discharged from the hospital this afternoon)...


CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2300

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

comhcinc wrote:Quiet every one. I am trying to sleep.
Shh, little one. Let this image comfort you.
0ef1e5f5c6835d667d2366e16958eaf8.jpg
(52.57 KiB) Downloaded 286 times
She's pure, Aryan goodness.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2301

Post by comhcinc »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
comhcinc wrote:Quiet every one. I am trying to sleep.
Shh, little one. Let this image comfort you.
0ef1e5f5c6835d667d2366e16958eaf8.jpg
She's pure, Aryan goodness.
No cock?

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2302

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Ape+lust wrote: good stuff snipped
I'm in a celebratory mood (was discharged from the hospital this afternoon)...
Yikes! Nothing serious, I hope.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2303

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

comhcinc wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
comhcinc wrote:Quiet every one. I am trying to sleep.
Shh, little one. Let this image comfort you.
0ef1e5f5c6835d667d2366e16958eaf8.jpg
She's pure, Aryan goodness.
No cock?
BYOC .

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2304

Post by comhcinc »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
comhcinc wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Shh, little one. Let this image comfort you.
0ef1e5f5c6835d667d2366e16958eaf8.jpg
She's pure, Aryan goodness.
No cock?
BYOC .
I have swore off relationships. Tried it. Didn't work.

Guest_0048cc29

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2305

Post by Guest_0048cc29 »

...melting pot...
I'm pretty sure the Hollywood Jewish Conspiracy, aided by Nicki Minaj, the Kardashians, booze and pot, the Porn Industry and feminists of all stripes handing out condoms and telling freshman their duty as feminists is to have lots of sex will be pretty persuasive on the majority of the children of Muslim immigrants and parents.

Madonna was known to be funded by the Mossad and the CIA on request of Ronald Reagan in the 80s.

[youtube]LDZX4ooRsWs[/youtube]

My anaconda don't, my anaconda don't
My anaconda don't want none unless you got buns, hun

I predict a lot of disappointed, dejected, disappointed Muslim Extremist parents 15 - 20 years after coming to the US to breed for Mohammed.

So yeah, melting pot.

... and that's not to mention bacon cheeseburgers.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2306

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Speaking of (mental) hospitals, I really think ol' Malody looks better without the glasses.
00d267557ae2b249a433b2e584cea8b8.jpg
(263.56 KiB) Downloaded 318 times

Guest_0048cc29

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2307

Post by Guest_0048cc29 »

> Madonna was known to be funded by the Mossad and the CIA on request of Ronald Reagan in the 80s ... as a first strike weapon deployed against the Soviet Union

Sigh. Hate stomping on my jokes, they start off piss poor and get worse with the bad typing.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2308

Post by Ape+lust »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Ape+lust wrote: good stuff snipped
I'm in a celebratory mood (was discharged from the hospital this afternoon)...
Yikes! Nothing serious, I hope.
I'm in little danger of imminent death or disability. I'm just working through some sobering developments in my health. I can't complain, except when I do :D

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2309

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

comhcinc wrote:snippy-do
I have swore off relationships. Tried it. Didn't work.
Ah, it's trite but true. It will get better. It seems like a fool's words, and that may be true, but it really will get better.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2310

Post by Ape+lust »

Ape+lust wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Ape+lust wrote: good stuff snipped
I'm in a celebratory mood (was discharged from the hospital this afternoon)...
Yikes! Nothing serious, I hope.
I'm in little danger of imminent death or disability. I'm just working through some sobering developments in my health. I can't complain, except when I do :D
I,I,I,I. Aiyiyiyi!

Also working through some ego issues, apparently.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2311

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Ape+lust wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Ape+lust wrote: good stuff snipped
I'm in a celebratory mood (was discharged from the hospital this afternoon)...
Yikes! Nothing serious, I hope.
I'm in little danger of imminent death or disability. I'm just working through some sobering developments in my health. I can't complain, except when I do :D
I am sorry to hear it. Happy to lend an ear or shoulder. Done the health routine pretty well meself these last few years, so misery and company and all that.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2312

Post by Brive1987 »

Ape+lust wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Ape+lust wrote: good stuff snipped
I'm in a celebratory mood (was discharged from the hospital this afternoon)...
Yikes! Nothing serious, I hope.
I'm in little danger of imminent death or disability. I'm just working through some sobering developments in my health. I can't complain, except when I do :D
Best of luck, break a leg and chin up. :D

Clarence
.
.
Posts: 2095
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 5:40 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2313

Post by Clarence »

Steersman wrote:
deLurch wrote:
Steersman wrote:I think it's kind of hard to argue against the claim that, as others have more or less agreed, chopping off hands for theft is likely to reduce the incidence of that crime. Not that that justifies that particular punishment, just that that is a reasonable inference as to its effect: the "is-ought" issue.
It is not proven that the punishment reduces that crime. However, I would expect it to be extremely effective in reducing the recidivism rate of those punished in that way.
Exactly. Though I don't find it entirely implausible that such punishments - particularly if "seen to be done" - would have a dampening effect on others. As I think the apocryphal (?) story, that someone told here recently, about the wallet full of money left in the middle of the street in Saudi Arabia - given that they too may support the "possession is nine tenths of the law", I certainly would be apprehensive about being found even holding something I wasn't entitled to.
deLurch wrote:That said, you bring up a good point about the cure being worse than the disease. That is what I think about the war on pot in the US. Someone gets a conviction, and suddenly they have more trouble finding gainful employment. And it disproportionately affects the black population of the US. It just isn't worth it or a little bit of pot.
Indeed. Maybe a moot point on where or on what issues to draw the line for prohibition - prohibiting child abuse: good; prohibiting pot: bad; prohibiting contract killers: good; prohibiting alcohol or prostitution or gambling: bad - but the evidence, particularly on pot and alcohol and drugs in general, is that, as you suggest, the cure is very frequently worse than the disease. That is maybe somewhat academic if one happens to be the victim or the relative of a victim run over by a drunk driver but, in looking at the sum total of the grief caused by many such prohibitions, it's hard not to reflect on the wisdom of that analogy. And on the conjecture that America, in particular though not exclusively, is driven by a rather problematic and odious Old Testament morality.

But you might be interested in this book (PDF, maybe not respecting the copyright) on Prohibitions that I ran across on "Maggie McNeill's" site (The Honest Courtesan) who has been rather vocal and impassioned about the odious effects of that morality in the context of prostitution.
Anyone who goes to The Honest Courtesan can't be all bad :)

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2314

Post by Ape+lust »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:I am sorry to hear it. Happy to lend an ear or shoulder. Done the health routine pretty well meself these last few years, so misery and company and all that.
Thanks, Cap'n! :dance:

If I get miserable, I'll just laugh at Peez and his ginormous prostate and heart stents. Whatever's going on with me, I'm not dumb enough to aggravate it with 24/7 rage-stomping.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2315

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Clarence wrote: Anyone who goes to The Honest Courtesan can't be all bad :)
And yet he is. A truly wankered shitstain masquerading as a human being. The fact he is okay with paying for sex and rationalizing it doesn't redeem his other failings, of which there are many.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2316

Post by Steersman »

Clarence wrote:Anyone who goes to The Honest Courtesan can't be all bad :)
:-) A saving grace? Though some seem not particularly impressed - mind made up and insisting they don't want to be confused by the facts by the look of it. Like denying agency to those "ladies of the evening", more than a few of whom not only don't see their choice as being the proverbial "fate worse than death" but frequently see significant social value in their contributions. With which I will happily and readily concur.

In any case, I see that a portion of my last comment was rather obscure at best; a second kick at the kitty:
Steersman wrote:
deLurch wrote:
Steersman wrote:I think it's kind of hard to argue against the claim that, as others have more or less agreed, chopping off hands for theft is likely to reduce the incidence of that crime. Not that that justifies that particular punishment, just that that is a reasonable inference as to its effect: the "is-ought" issue.
It is not proven that the punishment reduces that crime. However, I would expect it to be extremely effective in reducing the recidivism rate of those punished in that way.
Exactly. Though I don't find it entirely implausible that such punishments - particularly if "seen to be done" - would have a dampening effect on others. Given the apocryphal (?) story that someone told here recently about the wallet full of money left in the middle of the street in Saudi Arabia, and given that they too may support the principle of "possession is nine tenths of the law", I certainly would be apprehensive about being found even holding something I wasn't entitled to. ....

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2317

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Brive1987 wrote:Cross post.

Hi all.

I have updated the timeline per link in my original post ... oh OK ....
http://brive1987.wix.com/clowncar#!schism-history/py7ih

Things I can see missing include:

Franc and his "cunt kick"
Original date of blockbot (Ive got the BBC doco)
Jadehawks anti pit manifesto
Nugents attacks on slymepit (I was sure it was there but can't see it now. It's pre "dialog" of cause).
RW doxing that dude in Hong Kong and his girlfriend
PZ getting trolled by his own words
Alex shutting PZ down on his blog
Lousy offering to quit during terf-gate
The orbit.
Goldsmith meeting

What else? :)

http://i.imgur.com/f86kr9W.jpg
Nugent attacks the slymepit:
http://www.michaelnugent.com/2013/03/03 ... ent-195375

Of note are two comments on that thread, comment 215, in which Nugents listing tactics are turned against him, and comment 360 where Nugent does what we have NEVER seen from an FTBully or Skepchick - an admission of error.

Nugent followed up the this post:
http://www.michaelnugent.com/2013/03/05 ... ng-policy/

Comment 3 repeated the listing tactic (sealioning?) forcing Nugent to again apologize and update the post.

Nugent tried one last time to nail the pit after a troll posted some photoshopped porn pics of Benson, I think (I never saw the pictures because they were soon removed).

http://www.michaelnugent.com/2013/03/07 ... ked-image/

If I recall correctly Nugent linked to the trolls pictures - thus publicising them and thus causing Ophelia to almost have an epileptic fit.

After this Nugent gave up on attacking the slymepit and instead tried to set up the ill fated 'Dialogue' - which ended up with Steph Svan taking the FTB side and use the tactic of disagreeing with absolutely everything her opponents said - no matter how innocuous that was.

The Dialogue process collapsed when Benson doxxed Skep Tickle, using, I suspect, personal information from Tickle's email address (gained by Svan from the behind the scenes communications between the Dialogue teams and Nugent).

Franc's cuntkick comment (did not come from the slymepit - it was made on Abbie's ERV site).
http://greylining.com/2011/11/10/morpho ... t-comment/

Aneris
.
.
Posts: 3198
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:36 am
Location: /°\

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2318

Post by Aneris »

Old_ones wrote:[...] My whole reason for rejecting FTB and the SJWs is the fact that their points mirror those of Neo-Nazis. Both of these groups seem to think the world is a battleground between White Men and everyone else, and I don't see it that way. I think race and sex have very little importance, and the faster humanity can get away from balkanizing itself into these little tribes the better we'll all be for it.
Exactly.

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2319

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Aneris wrote:
Old_ones wrote:[...] My whole reason for rejecting FTB and the SJWs is the fact that their points mirror those of Neo-Nazis. Both of these groups seem to think the world is a battleground between White Men and everyone else, and I don't see it that way. I think race and sex have very little importance, and the faster humanity can get away from balkanizing itself into these little tribes the better we'll all be for it.
Exactly.
The thing that both groups have in common is an adherence to identity politics - a factor that also shared by AFVM.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2320

Post by Brive1987 »

Thanks Strawkins, great context. It was fun seeing Nugent try his logic approach "now you have drawn the line please define it fully and apply it uniformly" - only to be shot down.

Not that I want to engage much on this topic, but I was under the impression that Skep had much earlier linked first name and nym in an email/user combo and this together with profession and office holding at an A/S org gave them what they wanted. Benson in particular was bobbing up and down on hot coals in one post wanting to blurb - dropping hints left and right like a geriatric eating jelly.

The actual doxing was done by "theblackcat" at Myers using a hyperlink, followed by Skep trying to damage control at another blog - which gave oolon what he considerd to be a blank cheque to finally use the name at SZvans. And FtB permission to say forever more that she had 'doxed herself'.

Couch
.
.
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:59 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2321

Post by Couch »

HunnyBunny wrote:
Creativity73 wrote: Maths - a declining population that continues to dwindle ends up extinct. A population with a higher birth rate replaces them. I am a mother of seven who is trying to hold that back. It doesn't help when people just bury their heads in the sand and ignore basic maths. I notice you never explain your reasoning for your criticisms - just misunderstand and insult. I am glad you don't like me though.
I don't like you either. I think you're a horrible person for having seven children simply to preserve whitey rules. I think you are certifiably insane if you believe any of that shit on that website. I hope that your seven children grow up to realise what a shitstain of an ideology you follow, but forgive you because they realise you are either dumb or certifiably insane. I hope someone gets you the help you need.

Now fuck off.
My parents had seven kids for ideological reasons, and they were nice (Catholics)....

Creativity73
.
.
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:29 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2322

Post by Creativity73 »

I probably will leave. i was looking for ANTI Social Justice Warriors here but instead it's full of ANTIFA. Basically your view against "racism" are on the exact same level as the feminists who have hysterics over "patriarchy". The Free Thought Blogs I have heard of have men just like you on there. Your differences are arbitrary. But I have learned all I need to here.

Creativity73
.
.
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:29 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2323

Post by Creativity73 »

Btw listen to the recent episode on Sargon's channel:
This is how you lot should be thinking.

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2324

Post by feathers »

Spike13 wrote:
John D wrote:Meanwhile... some pictures of my favorite tank from WWII... the Sherman.

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/milita ... tures.html
Let's not start that again....
Yeah, that discussion will tank.

Eskarina
.
.
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 12:55 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2325

Post by Eskarina »

Creativity73 wrote:Btw listen to the recent episode on Sargon's channel:
This is how you lot should be thinking.
AFAIC, you're welcome to stay here and really learn something.

Lesson 1: Don't tell me how and what I should think.

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2326

Post by feathers »

Pitchguest wrote:Am I going mad or is one of our new arrivals advocating for Sharia?
To be honest, I'm not quite sure what they're arguing for. But they do try to compare crime statistics for culturally and politically completely dissimilar countries, so this must end in tears.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2327

Post by KiwiInOz »

Creativity73 wrote:Btw listen to the recent episode on Sargon's channel:
This is how you lot should be thinking.
Have you run the same lens over your Creativity ideology? Have you considered the fact that the parallels make it a natural bed mate with Islamism? Does this concern you? If not, why not?

What is a/the white race? Does the field of genetics inform or contradict your ideology?

Feel free to stay and engage. Best not to try preaching though. It doesn't go down well with atheists.

x_?_x
.
.
Posts: 207
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 12:54 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2328

Post by x_?_x »

This week in 'Pit history:

Steersman finally makes a friend.

http://40.media.tumblr.com/8b7d128343dd ... 2_1280.jpg

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2329

Post by feathers »

comhcinc wrote:
Skep tickle wrote:The website that you've linked in your profile here suggests the racial aspect is your main concern.
http://i.imgur.com/wQQZhv0.jpg

http://creativitymovement.net/
Holy crap, hadn't noticed that. Steeheers! Found a wife for you!

jimthepleb
.
.
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:54 am
Location: you kay?

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2330

Post by jimthepleb »

deLurch wrote:Bundles of joy
[youtube]XvVnMSQ7rVg[/youtube]
Fucking townies.

VickyCaramel
.
.
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:24 am
Location: Sitting with feet up
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2331

Post by VickyCaramel »

Creativity73 wrote:Btw listen to the recent episode on Sargon's channel:
This is how you lot should be thinking.
Your website says that Creators should shun sexual deviation. What does this mean?

Aneris
.
.
Posts: 3198
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:36 am
Location: /°\

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2332

Post by Aneris »

Dick Strawkins wrote:
Aneris wrote:
Old_ones wrote:[...] My whole reason for rejecting FTB and the SJWs is the fact that their points mirror those of Neo-Nazis. Both of these groups seem to think the world is a battleground between White Men and everyone else, and I don't see it that way. I think race and sex have very little importance, and the faster humanity can get away from balkanizing itself into these little tribes the better we'll all be for it.
Exactly.
The thing that both groups have in common is an adherence to identity politics - a factor that also shared by AFVM.
Indeed, somehow through all the old digging, I'm reminded of really old comments... viewtopic.php?p=128480#p128480
Aneris wrote:Individualists who don't want to be taken hostage by whatever the labels and genres pick up over time can only escape by eschewing them, thereby speeding up the process. I don't want to be defined by what other people are doing with some label we somehow share, thus I'm mostly avoiding them, or use labels deemed nonsensical by some, like Discordian. But that plays to generalisations. When people really go out of their way and want to appear conformist to some label and getting all the group hugs on one side, they have to deal with criticism that comes from the other side, too.

Added to that, many labels have vastly different meanings. Just see "democrat" US versus Europe. And finally, they are always just facets of a person, where its importance can be misleading. We know Jan Steen mostly for his photoshops, that's the facet we're seeing, but they hardly take up his day. And don't reveal anything what is otherwise important to him. He could be, for the sake of illustration, hang out as Frits de Ruijter in some other forum giving fitness tips, and he could be in real life a hurdler. Which is another reason why identity politics have nothing to do on the internet, and should GTFO. Arguably, you can't have both authenticity (another nonsense idea), but then hope that people make no comments on what they authentically see.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2333

Post by KiwiInOz »

VickyCaramel wrote:
Creativity73 wrote:Btw listen to the recent episode on Sargon's channel:
This is how you lot should be thinking.
Your website says that Creators should shun sexual deviation. What does this mean?
No deviating from sex?

VickyCaramel
.
.
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:24 am
Location: Sitting with feet up
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2334

Post by VickyCaramel »

KiwiInOz wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote:
Creativity73 wrote:Btw listen to the recent episode on Sargon's channel:
This is how you lot should be thinking.
Your website says that Creators should shun sexual deviation. What does this mean?
No deviating from sex?
I'm digging the uniforms, but thats because I am a sexual deviant.

blitzem
.
.
Posts: 709
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:40 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2335

Post by blitzem »

Creativity73 wrote:I probably will leave. i was looking for ANTI Social Justice Warriors here but instead it's full of ANTIFA. Basically your view against "racism" are on the exact same level as the feminists who have hysterics over "patriarchy". The Free Thought Blogs I have heard of have men just like you on there. Your differences are arbitrary. But I have learned all I need to here.
I know I am feeding the Nazi troll, but....

If you really think that people here are antifa, which I understand to mean middle-class people that only hate racism directed to non-whites, then I suggest that you are trolling, haven't been paying attention and/or didn't do enough back-reading.

People here are constantly calling out SJW's for their gender bias towards men and their racial bias towards whites and are usually in favour of a meritocracy based on skill level and effort. Pitters, though not monolithic (see what I did there?), generally call out any racism regardless of the source and mock those who, in their attempt to be inclusive, actually seem to forget to include white men in their meetings and social activities (it's okay when they do it).

But, since you are apparently all about the confirmation bias (we suck and you have "proven" it remarkable quickly) and are trolling...ass and smack and all that.

Cnutella
.
.
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 7:02 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2336

Post by Cnutella »

Creativity73 wrote:I probably will leave. i was looking for ANTI Social Justice Warriors here but instead it's full of ANTIFA. Basically your view against "racism" are on the exact same level as the feminists who have hysterics over "patriarchy". The Free Thought Blogs I have heard of have men just like you on there. Your differences are arbitrary. But I have learned all I need to here.
Oh no, don't go... I..

I love you.

Cnutella
.
.
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 7:02 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2337

Post by Cnutella »

Creativity73 wrote:I probably will leave. i was looking for ANTI Social Justice Warriors here but instead it's full of ANTIFA. Basically your view against "racism" are on the exact same level as the feminists who have hysterics over "patriarchy". The Free Thought Blogs I have heard of have men just like you on there. Your differences are arbitrary. But I have learned all I need to here.
Oh no, don't go... I..

I love you.

Jan Steen
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 3061
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 3:18 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2338

Post by Jan Steen »

A guest blogger on the Friendly Atheist relates an amusing news item:
A suicide bomber boarded a Somali passenger jet Tuesday and proceeded to detonate a bomb in mid-air. The blast blew a hole in the wall of the jet that sucked the blazing terrorist out, dropping his pathetic body 20 miles north of Mogadishu. Aside from the bomber himself, all of the 74 passengers survived, with only two of them reported injured.
(...)
It’s believed the man managed to get the explosives past security by pretending to be wheelchair-bound. So far the person has not been identified, nor have any terrorist groups come forward to claim the attack.
Now imagine you are a SJW and try to spot the "problematic" bit. Can't find it? Let Pharyngulanha Crip Dyke enlighten you.

http://i.imgur.com/mv0l7eA.jpg

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyat ... in-a-blaze

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2339

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Old_ones wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:OK lets say Creativity73 is a full blown Nazi and for white supremacy. She is still here so lets ask her questions and try to understand why she holds such views without the dogpilling. What is to be lost with engaging someone from the far right, lets see what they have to say. I have no time for the left = good and the right = bad bullshit. Too many pitters are indulging in the eww right wingers have cooties and lets show my disapproval by calling them names. Hmm I wonder where I have seen that sort of behaviour before, O right the very people we call out every day. What if Creativity73 has only recently been spooked out by current events and sort succore from people who shared her fears. Or we can just be a mirror image of FTBlogs etc though fuck that for a game of totalitarians.
Engage with Creativity73 however you want. This is the pit, you have that freedom. But I don't have to follow your suggestions, and I don't need Creativity73 to explain the Nazi position to me. I started reading up on Neo-Nazis and talking to them when I was about 20 and discovered Black Metal. My position is that I have more friends who are non-white than white so I don't have any use for the Nazi position. Moreover, I don't want to be associated with any message boards that are friendly toward Nazis. I like the pit, and I don't want to have to distance myself from it because its welcoming people from Stormfront or the BNP or whatever. I'd also prefer it if the FTB crowd didn't even have a ghost of a point when they referred to us as "white supremacists". I don't speak for the pit any more than you do, so obviously this is all just my opinion, but I'm not interested in making Creativity73 feel at home here.

My whole reason for rejecting FTB and the SJWs is the fact that their points mirror those of Neo-Nazis. Both of these groups seem to think the world is a battleground between White Men and everyone else, and I don't see it that way. I think race and sex have very little importance, and the faster humanity can get away from balkanizing itself into these little tribes the better we'll all be for it.
#NotAllBlackMetalGroupsAreNazis

http://www.bbc.com/travel/story/2015121 ... al-collide

Couch
.
.
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:59 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#2340

Post by Couch »

Creativity73 wrote:I probably will leave. i was looking for ANTI Social Justice Warriors here but instead it's full of ANTIFA. Basically your view against "racism" are on the exact same level as the feminists who have hysterics over "patriarchy". The Free Thought Blogs I have heard of have men just like you on there. Your differences are arbitrary. But I have learned all I need to here.
Please stay. You might convert some peeps to your cause. Come on, you should at least give it a go. Nothing to be lost.

You might find this helpful: We Have an optional 'rotating buddy' system for newcomers, if they want, just til they reach 100 posts. This month you have to pick your buddy from members who have a boat in their avatar.

Locked