ERV wrote:Guest_1c706012 wrote:Going viral should keep her new career as science dudette afloat, she thinks. Or hopes.
Recently laid off from pesticide manufacturer Amvac Chemical Corp., she had been out of work and almost out of money. Now she was accepting paid speaking engagements and waiting to hear if a television series would be in the offing, too.
latimes. com/local/great-reads/la-me-c1-hip-science-20150416-story.html]I fucking hate the internet.[/url]
It looks like she stepped into a needed role & some others don't like it?
Shes not a skepchick fan -- not after this---
ascienceenthusiast. com/i-fucking-cant-even-i-fucking-love-science/
Qualifications-'
csicop. org/specialarticles/show/feeding_the_mindchallenging_the_mythsscience_babe
&
abc.net. au/7.30/content/2015/s4293887.htm
also
The enemy of my enemy is not my friend. Ain't got no love for diva drop outs demanding titles they didn't earn, and then crying 'sexism!' when they don't get them.
Theres nothing wrong with being SciBabe. But she's not a scientist any more than I am a musician just because I played the cello for 10 years 15 years ago.
Can't have it both ways. Can't bitch that with one or two exceptions, the people taking the time and effort to communicate science to the proles aren't good enough but not have any better options than "I'm sure there's LOTS of people". Well, there may be, but, and here's the important part:
They aren't communicating to anyone who isn't also a scientist.
Pubmed may be a great indicator of how good a scientist someone is, but it does exactly fuck-
nothing to counter the relentless bullshit that skilled PR flacks like Vani Hari put out. What good is it to bag on Scibabe when your other options, who have "real" degrees and are "real" scientists who are doing a "real" job of communicating various disciplines of science to people and are not NDT are...
I'll wait for the long, long list.
Yes, she calls herself "Scibabe". Big fucking deal. She doesn't have a Ph.D. Big fucking deal. She's doing something that not a lot of people want to do. If so many people are outraged at how she's doing that communication thing, they are welcome to get their asses out there and do it too.
And unless I'm mistaken, she's not claimed to be a research scientist, nor claimed to have doctorate or what have you. She's been pretty straight up about her experience and degrees.
If the worst thing people can come up with is shit like "She wears stupid lab coats" "she's not a "real" scientist" "she's cutesy"...really? Because NDT can't do it all folks. But that seems to be the only people you'll accept. Oh and Bill Nye.
Who, as I recall, has no post-grad degree whatsoever. And isn't *any* form of scientist, but an engineer. Nor do I believe that he has a large amount of proper, peer-reviewd papers.
Yet, I hear no one complaining that a mere engineer, without a real degree calls himself the "Science Guy".
maybe it's the lack of lab coat.