The Refuge of the Toads

Old subthreads
VickyCaramel
.
.
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:24 am
Location: Sitting with feet up
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31621

Post by VickyCaramel »

Kirbmarc wrote: "Neonaziphobia" :lol:

It doesn't matter how "nice and peaceful" one is when they're supporting an authoritarian ideology which is all about placing one ethnicity over others, and which has led to one of the biggest (if not the biggest) number of innocent casualties in history. If they don't commit or take part in acts of violence or theft or in other acts which actually violate other people's rights they shouldn't be punished just for their ideas (I don't believe that restricting their speech is a good thing to do), but their ideas are hideous, and if they support them they're either not so "nice" or pretty clueless. They shouldn't be let close to any position of power, either.

Also being nice to your friends and family and to those you consider white enough for your liking doesn't necessarily mean that you're going to be "nice" to those you consider subhuman. I'm sure Hitler was nice to his secretaries and his dog, too, and he could be charming to some of his allies, at least in public.

People too often confuse being friendly and nice with being harmless. Given power and no social accountability most people would find it hard to behave morally, but this goes doubly so for people who follow dogmatic ideas about who's superior and who's inferior.
Good point duly noted.
Or I could have just been using sarcasm to point out that the regressives have suddenly come to the realization that ideologies get people killed. Now if only we can make them understand that Islam is a far right ideology.

Kirbmarc
.
.
Posts: 10577
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:29 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31622

Post by Kirbmarc »

VickyCaramel wrote:
Kirbmarc wrote: "Neonaziphobia" :lol:

It doesn't matter how "nice and peaceful" one is when they're supporting an authoritarian ideology which is all about placing one ethnicity over others, and which has led to one of the biggest (if not the biggest) number of innocent casualties in history. If they don't commit or take part in acts of violence or theft or in other acts which actually violate other people's rights they shouldn't be punished just for their ideas (I don't believe that restricting their speech is a good thing to do), but their ideas are hideous, and if they support them they're either not so "nice" or pretty clueless. They shouldn't be let close to any position of power, either.

Also being nice to your friends and family and to those you consider white enough for your liking doesn't necessarily mean that you're going to be "nice" to those you consider subhuman. I'm sure Hitler was nice to his secretaries and his dog, too, and he could be charming to some of his allies, at least in public.

People too often confuse being friendly and nice with being harmless. Given power and no social accountability most people would find it hard to behave morally, but this goes doubly so for people who follow dogmatic ideas about who's superior and who's inferior.
Good point duly noted.
Or I could have just been using sarcasm to point out that the regressives have suddenly come to the realization that ideologies get people killed. Now if only we can make them understand that Islam is a far right ideology.
I figured that this was likely, I just was amused by the "neonaziphobia" thing.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31623

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Bhurzum wrote:
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Is the British Army still an effective fighting force? I'm not sure. Certainly their special services are good units, but I think the main corps is hobbled by lack of money, poor leadership, and SJ/PC.
Quite a large subject and given my awful writing skills, something I'm not too keen to tackle. However, if you can ignore my terrible word-salads,I'll give it a go...

1) Still an effective fighting force?

Yes. However, it depends upon the nature and scale of the ops in question. Also of note, we are no longer training for "high intensity war-fighting" as a main effort (key element of our old mission statement) but are now geared more towards peacekeeping, COIN (counter-insurgency) and inter-operability with other NATO forces.

With that in mind, it's foolish to doubt our Army and/or it's effectivness. Don't forget the "purple" element - you'll rarely (if ever) encounter the Army on its own. We always have the RAF and Navy supporting us (forgetting other friendly/NATO forces for the time being) and together, we can deal a shit-ton of damage at very short notice.

As a theoretical "stand alone Army", we're trained to a far higher standard than many other conventional fighting forces on the planet. Our rank and file troops, the backbone of the Army, are almost trained to the same standards as the special forces in other countries. We learn and practice things that other conventional troops view as "specialist training."

2) Special forces

The best on the planet. Most special forces model themselves after the SAS or mimic their training methods and structures. Foolish to deny it.

3) Hobbled by lack of money, poor leadership

a) Lack of money - absolutely. It's been a constant worry/concern for the last 15 years or so and budget constraints have really started to bite deep. When I first joined up, a "standard" exercise for the Regiment involved the full fleet, RHQ, all of the CSS elements (combat service support - REME, medics, caggage and baggage etc) and could last up to a month on the training area and always ended with a lengthy range package (everything from personal weapons/grenades all the way up to main armament).

Just as I retired, a standard exercise was a week in the sticks (mainly on foot) and if we got lucky, a spot of CAB-F (confirmation of accuracy by firing) on the wagons. "Budget" is a dirty word to me.

b) Poor leadership - depends what you mean?

On the political level, it's a subjective call. Personally, I fucking hate the state of politics in the UK, despise the way the MOD are eroded/shackled by cunts in air conditioned offices and view several UK politicians as criminals and traitors. I'm not prepared to get into that any further.

On the formation level, it's a mixed bag. We've had some really strong leaders (Mike Jackson being a prime example) and some not-so-strong. Thankfully, due to the wonders of "mission command", the top brass tend to keep out of the mix once the ball starts rolling. At the brigade and battlegroup level, the powers that be are much more "hands on" and it's not unusual to see the buggers scooting around the AO making a nuisance of themselves.

(I had the rare pleasure of watching a certain high ranking individual cry like a fucking baby because a local took a pot-shot in our general direction. For five minutes, the only words out of his sewer were "where's my fucking helicopter?")

On the local level/boots on the ground - Again, a mixed bag. You get some good guys/gals, you get some average (I'd put myself in this group) and you get a few wankers. It's like any managerial role I suppose. Except with guns.

4) PC/SJ - Not as bad as you might think. Sure, the official standards have started to drop, bars have been lowered and chickens have been sacrificed to appease the gods of SOCJUS but old habits/standards just won't die. The Army, for all its failings, has a hive mind/memory and it'll take more than a few sour-faced Guardian readers to erase them.

Anyway, sorry for the garbled wall of gibberish, hopefully some of that made sense and answered your questions?
Thanks, very interesting to read your thoughts.

d4m10n
.
.
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:17 am
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31624

Post by d4m10n »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:The damage control needs to begin before that shit hits the fan. If people like Damion are so concerned about CQ's future, they ought not lob softball questions at Metskas, rather urge her to resign immediately.
Inflaming a moral panic up to the point where we're demanding resignations posthaste. Nothing ess-jay-dub to see here.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31625

Post by Tigzy »

Kirbmarc wrote:
Tigzy wrote:Heh. That was me. The point, which flew way over Dicky's average caucasian head, was to mock his misguided belief that other guys must surely envy him having girlfriends who like tell him about the other dudes they've fucked. Dicky just thought I was agreeing with him at how wonderful it all is. The fucking nitwit.
Carrier is a textbook narcissist. Narcissists find it very hard to understand when they're being mocked if you do it through backhanded compliments. There are actually some tests for narcissist tendencies based on being praised in an over the top fashion.
Normal people realize that they're being made fun of after a while and feel uneasy. Narcissists don't, unless you explicitly point it out that they're being made fun of.
Yup. The best example was when Parsehole posted to his blog, saying something along the lines of 'I don't know how I'll live without being able to buy your ground-breaking book!' To which Carrier responded with, 'I'm not sure if this is a troll or not.' :lol:

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31626

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

d4m10n wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:The damage control needs to begin before that shit hits the fan. If people like Damion are so concerned about CQ's future, they ought not lob softball questions at Metskas, rather urge her to resign immediately.
Inflaming a moral panic up to the point where we're demanding resignations posthaste. Nothing ess-jay-dub to see here.
You either don't get PR, or are emotionally invested in the matter.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31627

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Tigzy wrote:There's a certain amusement to be had in knowing that despite being so enthusiastically poly, Dicky never saw Heina, Amy and, uh, Greta coming.
I doubt Dicky's ever seen a woman come.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31628

Post by Ape+lust »

Tigzy wrote:http://imgur.com/9S0ndRf.jpg

Heh. That was me. The point, which flew way over Dicky's average caucasian head, was to mock his misguided belief that other guys must surely envy him having girlfriends who like tell him about the other dudes they've fucked. Dicky just thought I was agreeing with him at how wonderful it all is. The fucking nitwit.
Aw, shit. You?

Clearly, my suspicion of socks is as overdeveloped as Carrier's gullibility for flattering trolls. I give up :lol:

Bhurzum
Brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead
Posts: 5059
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:08 am
Location: Lurking in a dumpster

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31629

Post by Bhurzum »

Tigzy wrote:[The best example was when Parsehole posted to his blog, saying something along the lines of 'I don't know how I'll live without being able to buy your ground-breaking book!' To which Carrier responded with, 'I'm not sure if this is a troll or not.' :lol:
Parsehole!

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3DjGNaB0cJ0/hqdefault.jpg

ThreeFlangedJavis
.
.
Posts: 2181
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31630

Post by ThreeFlangedJavis »

VickyCaramel wrote:
Really? wrote:In all of the recent excitement, we forgot that Carrier's primary claim to fame is the most boring nit-picky topic ever.
Really? I am of the view that if atheists talked more about historicity of the bible instead of going over the same old philosophical arguments, you would not only convert more Christians, ironically you would also bring more women into the atheist movement.

It's just a shame that very few likable and/or believable people are making the argument.
The Xtians I know would just stare blankly at you and pity you for not having experienced the Grace of the Holy Spirit. Their emotions can't be wrong, so your version of history must be faulty.

Bhurzum
Brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead
Posts: 5059
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:08 am
Location: Lurking in a dumpster

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31631

Post by Bhurzum »

Just a wee bit of doggy nonsense...

[youtube]6MYaEIFa6OQ[/youtube]

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31632

Post by comhcinc »

JackSkeptic wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:It's getting harder and harder to not view the Brunsman-Metskas empire as a pipeline to feed their free-love, group sex community. First, get the young kids involved in atheist activism, then indoctrinate them into PoMo, SJW ideology as college students, then fill the cons with fresh meat for the hook-ups and orgies. All the while stacking the paid and volunteer staffs with fellow poly deviants.

It reeks of gangrene from top to bottom, not just because The two EDs swept a sexual harassment accusation under the rug to protect their paramour. Nothing less than the immediate resignation of the entire boards and staff of both SSA and CQ will suffice.
Won't happen unless it gets signal-boosted by someone big. Starting to hope that happens. Parents and participants aren't signing up for shenanigans, and the basic idea of the camp is good. I don't know to what extent if any grooming is going on, but they are condemned must by letting Carrier stay after he publicly stated he was banging students. Not the hallmark of a fine educational org in my prudish view.
It's not prudish, I do not think anyone here is being prudish ether. One thing a camp must never be about is sex. Condom water fights are all good, gets them used to not being scared of them. But someone like Carrier around AFTER he was told to keep away is creepy as fuck.

Except he has never been told to not have anything to do with Camp Quest.

People need to stop confusing the two organzations.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31633

Post by comhcinc »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:Although I don't believe it, it's only an hop, skip and a jump for rightwing, anti-atheist agitators to insinuate that CQ is a haven for child molesters run by a bunch of sexual predators. The damage control needs to begin before that shit hits the fan. If people like Damion are so concerned about CQ's future, they ought not lob softball questions at Metskas, rather urge her to resign immediately.

You are the only one making anything close to those claims. So don't be surprise when your ideas are stolen.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31634

Post by comhcinc »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
d4m10n wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:The damage control needs to begin before that shit hits the fan. If people like Damion are so concerned about CQ's future, they ought not lob softball questions at Metskas, rather urge her to resign immediately.
Inflaming a moral panic up to the point where we're demanding resignations posthaste. Nothing ess-jay-dub to see here.
You either don't get PR, or are emotionally invested in the matter.

I would say you are emotionally invested in the matter.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31635

Post by Really? »

comhcinc wrote: Except he has never been told to not have anything to do with Camp Quest.

People need to stop confusing the two organzations.
How do we know that for sure? More importantly, why would that be a bad thing? Brunsman censures Carrier for sexual harassment after having to deal with all of the annoying bullshit and the back-and-forth. Carrier and Metskas leave the room, holding each others' lubed hands and giggling.

Why isn't it outrageous for the head of one organization for young people to give a heads-up to the head of another organization for young people, particularly when you live in the same place and are fucking married?

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31636

Post by Really? »

Wow. Sticky Dicky is as dumb as he is horny.
So you're allowed to fuck the students as long as your name is not on a list. Shady as shit.

And here's the start of the Camp Quest drip drip. So Carrier has also provided "advice" in some manner even though he was not involved with Camp Quest in any way.

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31637

Post by Scented Nectar »

Bhurzum wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:It was something about how thick ones come into fashion every second year or something <snip>
Well, my "thick one" is always fashionable!

http://66.media.tumblr.com/057359f1b52a ... 0r_500.gif
A thick one is nice to find when the pants come down. Long and thick, that is, not some stubby 1"x1" technical choad, just to clarify. :P

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31638

Post by Scented Nectar »

blitzem wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:
blitzem wrote:
I am always taken aback by how Gabriel-esque her nose is. Maybe it's the booze?
I have no idea what Gabriel-esque means, but yes, I'm certain it's the booze. :D
Sorry SN, forgot a word...

"Alex" Gabriel-esque nose
Ok, now I understand. Yep, she's got one of those. :lol:

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31639

Post by JackSkeptic »

Scented Nectar wrote:
Bhurzum wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:It was something about how thick ones come into fashion every second year or something <snip>
Well, my "thick one" is always fashionable!

http://66.media.tumblr.com/057359f1b52a ... 0r_500.gif
A thick one is nice to find when the pants come down. Long and thick, that is, not some stubby 1"x1" technical choad, just to clarify. :P
And much widom is spoketh. Amen.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31640

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Really? wrote:Wow. Sticky Dicky is as dumb as he is horny.
So you're allowed to fuck the students as long as your name is not on a list. Shady as shit.
In response to Dicky violating no-frat policy for speakers, SSA simply altered his speaker status so he'd have free rein to hit on college girls at SSA events?

Sick and wrong.

Someone should retweet that to Heina and Amy.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31641

Post by comhcinc »

Really? wrote: How do we know that for sure?
You are right! In fact how do we know for sure they are not all lizard people? Nasty poly orgy lizard people coming after our little girls!!!

That is a pointless question because Carrier has not be accused of doing anything at a Camp Quest event and it's a question that can be asked about every place. I mean do we know for sure Carrier has been told to stay out of the Woolworths? Was it just the one store or the whole chain?

Yes there are very strong ties between the two organizations but to conflate them on purpose is dishonest.

Really? wrote: More importantly, why would that be a bad thing? Brunsman censures Carrier for sexual harassment after having to deal with all of the annoying bullshit and the back-and-forth. Carrier and Metskas leave the room, holding each others' lubed hands and giggling.

Why isn't it outrageous for the head of one organization for young people to give a heads-up to the head of another organization for young people, particularly when you live in the same place and are fucking married?

I think it's a bad thing because violation of an organization's rule, without breaking any laws, shouldn't automatically stop a person from working with other organizations.

I mean I don't want Carrier working with Camp Quest, but I also think it's unfair to assume because he see the lecture circuit as a direct trip to poon town, that he would see Camp Quest as the same thing. And yes I know he is cool with any legal age poon.

I want the same level of fairness applied to everyone. A person claimed Shermer raped her and we was very critical of that. A person claimed Carrier was creep and touched her hair, and we give her a pass because we know and dislike the creepy little hobbit.

It is not outside belief that the harassment claim was investigated and they were not exactly satisfied that he did anything wrong but decided to be cautious about it. I am not saying that I believe that is what happened but it certainly something that could happen. With the data we have it's okay to say we don't know.

Where I stand at this moment

Carrier is a creepy hobbit who is unethical about relationships.

Carrier most likely was creepy to at least one woman who reported him. He lost the visibility of being apart of the official SSA speaker's list.

The SSA most likely did not relay to it's chapters Carrier's dismissive in a transparent manner. If I was still a member I would make it a point that this was address and going forth things changed.

There are issues with Carrier fucking the head of Camp Quest who is married to the head of the SSA. It's unprofessional, but I am not sure it's unethical. I can be easily moved on this.

There is no evidence that Carrier is trolling Camp Quest for poon. And we are getting in to muddy waters when we jump to that conclusion.

The main take away to me is less what is actual going on with Carrier and more the silence that we have seen out of the usual suspects. Benson, PZ, the Orbit, SkepChicks, all silence outside of some facebook gossip.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31642

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Really? wrote:
comhcinc wrote: Except he has never been told to not have anything to do with Camp Quest.

People need to stop confusing the two organzations.
How do we know that for sure? More importantly, why would that be a bad thing? Brunsman censures Carrier for sexual harassment after having to deal with all of the annoying bullshit and the back-and-forth. Carrier and Metskas leave the room, holding each others' lubed hands and giggling.

Why isn't it outrageous for the head of one organization for young people to give a heads-up to the head of another organization for young people, particularly when you live in the same place and are fucking married?
The SSA-Carrier-CQ clusterfuck is infinitely worse because it is a veritable clusterfuck.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31643

Post by comhcinc »

Really? wrote:Wow. Sticky Dicky is as dumb as he is horny.
So you're allowed to fuck the students as long as your name is not on a list. Shady as shit.
Shady but not sure if dumb. The way I understand it he is correct. As I just said I think the SSA needed to be more transparent to it's branches what happen (he was removed) and why (because he is creepy Carrier)


Really? wrote:And here's the start of the Camp Quest drip drip. So Carrier has also provided "advice" in some manner even though he was not involved with Camp Quest in any way.
I mean he is fucking the head of the org. It does make sense that she might ask his opinion in between bukkake sessions and I also can't fault him for promoting fundraisers for the group because again that org has never told him he couldn't.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31644

Post by comhcinc »

New Chekov has died in a car crash.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/23 ... 655497.jpg

Walter Koenig demands to be allowed to take roll back over.





I made up that last part.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31645

Post by Really? »

comhcinc wrote:New Chekov has died in a car crash.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/23 ... 655497.jpg

Walter Koenig demands to be allowed to take roll back over.





I made up that last part.
Star Trek's Anton Yelchin dies in freak accident aged 27 after being run over by his own car
Found early Sunday morning on his steep driveway pinned between car and a brick mailbox
Vehicle was in neutral and engine was still running; police say no suspicious circumstances
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ge-27.html

Weird...

Malky
.
.
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:00 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31646

Post by Malky »

Bhurzum wrote:Just a wee bit of doggy nonsense...

[youtube]6MYaEIFa6OQ[/youtube]
Very funny - had to laugh at this.

One question I have which I don't mind if you don't answer is what rank did you hold in the Army? You show a very nuanced view of it which would in my mind put you at least at Senior NCO level.

Malky
.
.
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:00 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31647

Post by Malky »

comhcinc wrote: How do we know that for sure?
You are right! In fact how do we know for sure they are not all lizard people? Nasty poly orgy lizard people coming after our little girls!!!

That is a pointless question because Carrier has not be accused of doing anything at a Camp Quest event and it's a question that can be asked about every place. I mean do we know for sure Carrier has been told to stay out of the Woolworths? Was it just the one store or the whole chain?

Yes there are very strong ties between the two organizations but to conflate them on purpose is dishonest.

Really? wrote: More importantly, why would that be a bad thing? Brunsman censures Carrier for sexual harassment after having to deal with all of the annoying bullshit and the back-and-forth. Carrier and Metskas leave the room, holding each others' lubed hands and giggling.

Why isn't it outrageous for the head of one organization for young people to give a heads-up to the head of another organization for young people, particularly when you live in the same place and are fucking married?


I think it's a bad thing because violation of an organization's rule, without breaking any laws, shouldn't automatically stop a person from working with other organizations.

I mean I don't want Carrier working with Camp Quest, but I also think it's unfair to assume because he see the lecture circuit as a direct trip to poon town, that he would see Camp Quest as the same thing. And yes I know he is cool with any legal age poon.

I want the same level of fairness applied to everyone. A person claimed Shermer raped her and we was very critical of that. A person claimed Carrier was creep and touched her hair, and we give her a pass because we know and dislike the creepy little hobbit.

It is not outside belief that the harassment claim was investigated and they were not exactly satisfied that he did anything wrong but decided to be cautious about it. I am not saying that I believe that is what happened but it certainly something that could happen. With the data we have it's okay to say we don't know.

Where I stand at this moment

Carrier is a creepy hobbit who is unethical about relationships.

Carrier most likely was creepy to at least one woman who reported him. He lost the visibility of being apart of the official SSA speaker's list.

The SSA most likely did not relay to it's chapters Carrier's dismissive in a transparent manner. If I was still a member I would make it a point that this was address and going forth things changed.

There are issues with Carrier fucking the head of Camp Quest who is married to the head of the SSA. It's unprofessional, but I am not sure it's unethical. I can be easily moved on this.

There is no evidence that Carrier is trolling Camp Quest for poon. And we are getting in to muddy waters when we jump to that conclusion.

The main take away to me is less what is actual going on with Carrier and more the silence that we have seen out of the usual suspects. Benson, PZ, the Orbit, SkepChicks, all silence outside of some facebook gossip.

I agree quite a lot with the above - from what I have seen we have seen Carrier being Carrier which should surprise no-one and a refusal to by SJWs who know and have previously supported him refusing to call him out for behaviour which if dne by anyone else would a veritable pile-on. I have seen nothing that would be illegal but plenty that is creepy- i.e. Carrier being Carrier.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31648

Post by Shatterface »

Walter Koenig would never be seen dead under anything less than a nuclear wessel.

Running over yourself is surprisingly easy. Some guy from East 17 managed to do it, though he survived.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31649

Post by comhcinc »

Really? wrote:
Star Trek's Anton Yelchin dies in freak accident aged 27 after being run over by his own car
Found early Sunday morning on his steep driveway pinned between car and a brick mailbox
Vehicle was in neutral and engine was still running; police say no suspicious circumstances
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ge-27.html

Weird...

I mean you have to hope that drugs and alcohol played a role right? Getting run over by your own car while sober is just something that should never happen.

Being fucked up completely off your gourd and getting run over by your own car. That's a respectful way to go out.


Something something Tesla something something nuclear vessels.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31650

Post by Shatterface »

In the East 17 case he blamed an overdose of potatoes.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31651

Post by comhcinc »

Shatterface wrote:In the East 17 case he blamed an overdose of potatoes.
In the form of vodka that is acceptable.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31652

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Where I Stand at the Moment Actually, I'm reclining in bed. Laazzzy

I think any woman dumb enough to be fucking Carrier, let alone openly, is too stupid to work with children or be allowed to operate a motor vehicle.

Thank you

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31653

Post by comhcinc »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:Where I Stand at the Moment Actually, I'm reclining in bed. Laazzzy

I think any woman dumb enough to be fucking Carrier, let alone openly, is too stupid to work with children or be allowed to operate a motor vehicle.

Thank you

I think the same thing could be said about a lot of people and I include myself on that list.

Btw how ya feeling?

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31654

Post by Shatterface »

comhcinc wrote:
Shatterface wrote:In the East 17 case he blamed an overdose of potatoes.
In the form of vodka that is acceptable.
Not fermented, alas. He had made two prior suicide attempts. Running over yourself is a bit of a drastic way of killing yourself though.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ident.html

If Yelchin was pinned to the wall because the hand break was off it is unlikely to have killed him instantly.

Tragic. I liked him in Huff.

A shitty year continues.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31655

Post by Shatterface »

For clarification, the suicide attempt stuff above refers to the East 17 guy.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31656

Post by comhcinc »

I only saw him in the Star Trek reboots where he did a great job.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31657

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

comhcinc wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:Where I Stand at the Moment Actually, I'm reclining in bed. Laazzzy

I think any woman dumb enough to be fucking Carrier, let alone openly, is too stupid to work with children or be allowed to operate a motor vehicle.

Thank you

I think the same thing could be said about a lot of people and I include myself on that list.

Btw how ya feeling?
Still breathing. When you start the job? Tech stuff?

In all seriousness, attaching yourself to any of the FtB clowns, past or present is certain disaster. Doing so in an open way and working in a nonprofit org, with kids...some parents won't care. A lot will. And some of this stuff essentially eliminates a lot of future job prospects. Most employers don't have much taste for drama.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31658

Post by comhcinc »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Still breathing. When you start the job? Tech stuff?

In all seriousness, attaching yourself to any of the FtB clowns, past or present is certain disaster. Doing so in an open way and working in a nonprofit org, with kids...some parents won't care. A lot will. And some of this stuff essentially eliminates a lot of future job prospects. Most employers don't have much taste for drama.
I start tomorrow (Monday) yeah tech stuff. I'm good at it unfortunately.

I am not going to disagree with your sentiment but I can't play the guilt by association game. I have be associated with some squirrelly fuckers over the years.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31659

Post by Really? »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: In all seriousness, attaching yourself to any of the FtB clowns, past or present is certain disaster. Doing so in an open way and working in a nonprofit org, with kids...some parents won't care. A lot will. And some of this stuff essentially eliminates a lot of future job prospects. Most employers don't have much taste for drama.
Maybe Camp Quest is looking for a more discerning kind of parent to support their efforts. Parents who truly care about their children and social justice. Parents like Elyse.

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31660

Post by AndrewV69 »

Jan Steen wrote:
Thanks for confirming my suspicions about you.
I was under the impression that you two were both being sarcastic. Now I am not so sure.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31661

Post by Skep tickle »

Congrats on the new jobs, rayshul & com & Brive!

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31662

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Really? wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: In all seriousness, attaching yourself to any of the FtB clowns, past or present is certain disaster. Doing so in an open way and working in a nonprofit org, with kids...some parents won't care. A lot will. And some of this stuff essentially eliminates a lot of future job prospects. Most employers don't have much taste for drama.
Maybe Camp Quest is looking for a more discerning kind of parent to support their efforts. Parents who truly care about their children and social justice. Parents like Elyse.
Imagine how pissed Elyse is gonna be when her kids grow up to be straight-laced Republicans.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31663

Post by Skep tickle »

FWIW, the last Skepchickcon starts in 11 days. The schedule went up recently: https://skepchickcon.com/schedule/

Anyone reading this who is in contact with Watson, other Skepchickcon organizers, or one of the speakers below - and who cares - there's one entry that needs correction.

For Saturday July 2, the entry for one 11:00am session says:
Humans vs. Robots: Who Will Travel the Solar System?

Jim Tigwell, Amy Shira Teitel, Desiree Schell (mod), Nicole Gugliucci, Jason Thibeault

You probably know about DNA, but have you ever seen it? Using household stuff, you’ll be able to extract and observe DNA from strawberries in minutes!
To match the info at the link - and the session title - the description should read:
Human spaceflight captures the imagination like nothing else, but robotic probes have explored the Solar System with relative ease. We'll weigh the costs and benefits of sending humans to other planets versus sending our robotic proxies.
Probably just used a prior year's schedule as a template & missed updating this one session.

Oh, and you're welcome ;)

bovarchist
.
.
Posts: 1925
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:07 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31664

Post by bovarchist »

I just glanced in at Pharyngula (a mistake, as usual) and noticed that he was predictably howling about a pro-gun article he'd read somewhere. And what offended him most?

The argument that people should be allowed to own guns "because history". In other words, we should be allowed to own guns because we've always been a gun-owning nation.

Well, I agree...that's not a great argument.

But have you noticed that it's exactly the same argument the regressive left uses whenever the subject of open borders comes up? "We've always been a nation of immigrants!"

Just wanted to point that out. One shouldn't have to explain to liberals that doing something in the past is not a reason to keep doing it forever.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31665

Post by Steersman »

Jan Steen wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote:
Jan Steen wrote: <snip>
I'll go one step further, and say that the original nazis have been unfairly maligned as well. Most of them never liked to read Mein Kampf; they were perfectly decent people who just had a little problem with ze Yews. Right, Vicky?
Yep, not all Nazis, not all Muslims. Perfectly good argument.
Thanks for confirming my suspicions about you.
:lol: Y'all might want to read this post over at Quillette on the general concept of collective responsibility - and the consequences thereof:

The Josiah Effect: How Moderate Religion Fuels Fundamentalism

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31666

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Captain Fluffy Bunny: Check your email.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31667

Post by comhcinc »

bovarchist wrote:I just glanced in at Pharyngula (a mistake, as usual) and noticed that he was predictably howling about a pro-gun article he'd read somewhere. And what offended him most?

The argument that people should be allowed to own guns "because history". In other words, we should be allowed to own guns because we've always been a gun-owning nation.

Well, I agree...that's not a great argument.

But have you noticed that it's exactly the same argument the regressive left uses whenever the subject of open borders comes up? "We've always been a nation of immigrants!"

Just wanted to point that out. One shouldn't have to explain to liberals that doing something in the past is not a reason to keep doing it forever.
Because history is a bad argument, but understanding history helps with understanding the current issues.

For example if you are anti gun you have to understand that just trying to ban guns will never work in America as things currently stand. We became a country due to violent uprising. Guns have been an important part of almost every important part of our history good or bad, and for a lot of people it's hard for them to disconnect the right to guns with being an American. I think before you get rid of guns you have to change the culture.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31668

Post by comhcinc »

free thoughtpolice wrote:Captain Fluffy Bunny: Check your email.

Yes check I got something for you too!

http://i.imgur.com/D6a8MOn.jpg

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31669

Post by comhcinc »

Skep tickle wrote:Congrats on the new jobs, rayshul & com & Brive!

Hey thanks I am as giddy as a schoolgirl.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31670

Post by free thoughtpolice »

comhcinc wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:Captain Fluffy Bunny: Check your email.

Yes check I got something for you too!

http://i.imgur.com/D6a8MOn.jpg
OK asshole-FT is getting another pissy email about you for that. :twisted:

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31671

Post by comhcinc »

Is it giving you the vapors? Do you need a fainting couch?


That's my new thing btw, vapors and fainting couches.

MacGruberKnows
.
.
Posts: 1768
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 6:27 pm

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31672

Post by MacGruberKnows »

free thoughtpolice wrote:
comhcinc wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:Captain Fluffy Bunny: Check your email.

Yes check I got something for you too!

http://i.imgur.com/D6a8MOn.jpg
OK asshole-FT is getting another pissy email about you for that. :twisted:
Which wrestler is that one?

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31673

Post by comhcinc »

The best one.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31674

Post by Brive1987 »

Skep tickle wrote:Congrats on the new jobs, rayshul & com & Brive!
Thanks! 6.50am. Time to get past day one probation.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31675

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

comhcinc wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:Captain Fluffy Bunny: Check your email.

Yes check I got something for you too!

http://i.imgur.com/D6a8MOn.jpg
Goddamn it, I told dad that picture would come back to haunt him someday.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31676

Post by comhcinc »

Brive1987 wrote:
Skep tickle wrote:Congrats on the new jobs, rayshul & com & Brive!
Thanks! 6.50am. Time to get past day one probation.
Remember, find the biggest meanest person there and go right up to them and beat the shit out of them.

That way everyone will respect you.

Either that or bring doughnuts.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31677

Post by Steersman »

Bhurzum wrote:
comhcinc wrote:Listen here pal, I seen enough news reports to know you can't trust what killers say.

This was done mostly because of homophobia taught in America Christian churches. Maybe it also has to do with drone attacks.

One way or the other, it's clearly the fault of America.
:lol:

You mean Charlie Manson was lying about "helter skelter?"

Steers is gonna be pissed!
??? Generally familiar with the reference, although it seems to have a lot of connotations and uses, but Manson was saying otherwise? That everything wasn't the fault of America? Shocking. But while I think a lot of blame can be laid at America's doorstep, I rather doubt all of it can be:

But, en passant, nice analysis of the British Army - not at all a "word salad". :-) Though I had thought you had been in the US rather than in the UK forces. Learn something new every day and all that.

But I'm curious about your position on Brexit. Seems like a good idea for any number of reasons - putting an end to Muslim immigration for one thing, and the EU seems rather undemocratic to say the least. But this rather ambiguous tweet from Louise Mensch at least suggests some hidden gotchas for leaving - not that that should necessarily be decisive; principles and all that:

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31678

Post by comhcinc »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
comhcinc wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:Captain Fluffy Bunny: Check your email.

Yes check I got something for you too!

[imghttp://i.imgur.com/D6a8MOn.jpg[/img]
Goddamn it, I told dad that picture would come back to haunt him someday.

Yet you took it anyway.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31679

Post by Brive1987 »

It's this sort of self serving mental terraforming that makes RC a danger, His is a strictly true view that ignores the moral and ethical implications of SSA's action.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#31680

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

comhcinc wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
comhcinc wrote:snip


Yes check I got something for you too!

[imghttp://i.imgur.com/D6a8MOn.jpg[/img]
Goddamn it, I told dad that picture would come back to haunt him someday.

Yet you took it anyway.
Mom was too drunk, kept confusing the camera with her handgun.

Locked