KHAN!!!Aneris wrote: Wrath of Kahn is allegedly the best, but have yet to see it.
[youtube]wRnSnfiUI54[/youtube]
KHAN!!!Aneris wrote: Wrath of Kahn is allegedly the best, but have yet to see it.
Thousands of people from Afghanistan's Hazara minority had gathered to demand changes to the route of a planned multi-million dollar power transmission line.
...
A suicide bomber hit a large demonstration by members of Afghanistan’s Hazara minority in Kabul on Saturday that killed at least 80 and wounded around 231 people, according to Afghanistan Interior Ministry.
Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the attack, says the group’s Amaq News Agency.
Another incongruity between Islamic terrorists & the SJWs that defend them: The terrorists consistently step up & take responsibility for their own decisions.AndrewV69 wrote:Meanwhile, only a day ago Kabul: At least 80 feared killed, more than 200 wounded in IS claimed bomb attackThousands of people from Afghanistan's Hazara minority had gathered to demand changes to the route of a planned multi-million dollar power transmission line.
...
A suicide bomber hit a large demonstration by members of Afghanistan’s Hazara minority in Kabul on Saturday that killed at least 80 and wounded around 231 people, according to Afghanistan Interior Ministry.
Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the attack, says the group’s Amaq News Agency.
Your islamaphobia is throbbing away for everyone to see you murtad.AndrewV69 wrote:Meanwhile, only a day ago Kabul: At least 80 feared killed, more than 200 wounded in IS claimed bomb attackThousands of people from Afghanistan's Hazara minority had gathered to demand changes to the route of a planned multi-million dollar power transmission line.
...
A suicide bomber hit a large demonstration by members of Afghanistan’s Hazara minority in Kabul on Saturday that killed at least 80 and wounded around 231 people, according to Afghanistan Interior Ministry.
Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the attack, says the group’s Amaq News Agency.
Darth Cynic wrote:My sincere apologies sir but when you think of Voyager and why you detest it - sorry Commander - then that grinning gobshite is soon to manifest in your mind's eye if your mental blocks aren't as secure as yours.
There is something I learned a long time ago about muslims, in regards to the Iranians and their support for Hezbollah and the Palestinians, which is that they act as if the future is predetermined. In the case of the Iranians, they "know" that at some point in the future, the Jews will be gone from Palestine and muslims will once again own the holy sites in the Levant... it is the will of Allah, so it is inevitable.Aneris wrote:Just saw this, and it's RE: Steersman et al who claim public TV in Germany allegedly sweeps it all under the rug. Another counter-example: Fear of Terror on the Rise. Justified? (GERMAN)
She says, terror was worse but it used to be more regional (IRA in Ireland, ETA in Spain, RAF in Germany etc) and aimed at government or specific individuals. So what's different now? Quotation: "The Islamistic terror of today is targeted at the entire free western world and lifestyle, so are terror attacks always attacks against the whole west."
He still gets into heaven, only he gets 1 72 year old virgin. :bjarte:fuzzy wrote:One wonders, in the hypothetical case that this was a muslim sinner with perhaps a premature explosion problem, whether he gets into heaven for his intentions even though no infidels were killed.comslave wrote:It appears only the bomber died. It's like they're not even trying anymore.
free thoughtpolice wrote:He still gets into heaven, only he gets 1 72 year old virgin. :bjarte:fuzzy wrote:One wonders, in the hypothetical case that this was a muslim sinner with perhaps a premature explosion problem, whether he gets into heaven for his intentions even though no infidels were killed.comslave wrote:It appears only the bomber died. It's like they're not even trying anymore.
So what is he then? A martyr, or a fucking Jalfrezi?!Pitchguest wrote:Obligatory.comslave wrote:It appears only the bomber died. It's like they're not even trying anymore.
[youtube]CBjKZaSvfGg[/youtube]
One can only hope that the the dumbasses and mentally immature children that decide to go jihadi get to see that movie and documentation of how that movement is not only futile, but profoundly stupid.Lsuoma wrote:So what is he then? A martyr, or a fucking Jalfrezi?!Pitchguest wrote:Obligatory.comslave wrote:It appears only the bomber died. It's like they're not even trying anymore.
[youtube]CBjKZaSvfGg[/youtube]
Dr Phlox was like they saw how much they had fucked up with Neelix - after all they effectively wrote him out around season 4 or 5 - and now they had an opportunity for a do over and redemption, and in Phlox's case it worked.comhcinc wrote:Darth Cynic wrote:My sincere apologies sir but when you think of Voyager and why you detest it - sorry Commander - then that grinning gobshite is soon to manifest in your mind's eye if your mental blocks aren't as secure as yours.
I swear to fuck I had completely forgotten about him. I watched the show when it aired and not since. As soon as you mentioned him it all came back and he was one of the main reasons I disliked the show.
I can also see now that maybe it's one of the reasons I subconsciously like Enterprise so much. You never see the fucking cook in that show. They have a cook, they mention the cook most episodes, but you never see him. Also Dr Plox is kinda like Neelix except he was fucking awesome.
I love the new 3D. I have two very different eyes, color, pupil size and structure so things like Magic 3D, old 3D and stuff never worked at all for me. But for some reason the new 3D technology is mesmerizing for me. Not enough to save the Hobbit movies for me, but I do love the visuals.comhcinc wrote:CommanderTuvok wrote:I saw Star Trek Beyond in 3D, due to the timings. It was visually poor. I'm sure the 2D print would have been far superior. I've never taken to 3D, perhaps because I also wear glasses, and having TWO pairs of glasses to watch a darkened screen doesn't work for me.Gumby wrote:Everyone's talking about the new Ghostbusters, but don't worry there's plenty of movie suckage to go around. Just got back from Star Trek: Beyond. What a mess, and I say this as a person who can find something to like about anything Star Trek. Hyperactive action, CGI and noise are no substitutes for an actual plot. 6/10, if that.
BTW, the bit with the "bike" was daft.
3D actually makes me queasy. So I am with you about not caring about 3D. Honestly I am surprised it's still a thing.
Darth Cynic wrote:Btw why are people talking about Islamic inspired terror, surely Star Trek is more important!?
From what I have pieced together it goes something like this:Clarence wrote: How you can doubt that policies that rely on "believing the victim", require no evidence, and lead to monetary payouts might lead to injustices and witchhunts is beyond me.
So we get the "Dear College" letter that started the "ignore due process, do not get the police involved" kangaroo courts where the ability to defend yourself if you are male is dismantled because otherwise the man who is a rapist because he is a man would get away with it because Patriarchy.We all know that men are rapists and that many women are raped every day and that the men get away because of rape culture. So it is up to us women who get into power to put a stop to it because the Patriarchy will not.
The fact that crime statistics do not back us up about all the rape that all women everywhere, particularly in Western countries is because of rape culture and Patriarchy which prevents women from reporting rape.
Therefore, we must start prosecuting men for rape and dismantle all impediments that prevent us from charging men for rape and convicting them of rape and heavily punishing them for it.
Then your memory is as bad as your purported 'skepticism'. I never discussed nor dismissed the charging or jailing of Jared the Subway Guy.Shatterface wrote:I can't remember a single case of paedophilia that you haven't dismissed.Clarence wrote:As far back as the early 60's?Shatterface wrote: You know, they never actually put Hitler on trial?
There's a difference between skepticism and la la la can't hear you. Accusations against Savile were made as far back as the early Sixties. Why? Because people were hoping he'd get rich, some irrelevant shit would happen on US campuses, and fifty-plus years later his accusers would get a pension?
Wow! You'd never have guessed that he had already been a DJ, sport person, and radio personality by then, would you?
And that just about anyone who comes into contact with large amounts of teens or kids over a long period of time gets rumors and accusations of this sort thrown about them.
No one ever substantiated any of those , now, did they?
It's interesting that you think accusation = guilt esp when accusation:
A. Is allowed for things that allegedly happened decades ago
B. No one has yet been punished for lying, even though some claimants won't get money because as Anna Racoon notes, their stories were found to be physically impossible
C. You get money if your accusation is not disproven. In short, its not up to you to prove anything, its up to his estate to disprove it.
D. Did I mention you get to make your accusations anonymously?
That you find any 'truth' in this kind of 'investigation' is on you.
That's one.Aneris wrote:I have just learned about it, and German news report, citing the mayor Ms Seidel, that they assume an explosive caused it.Keating wrote:I'll wait for Aneris to tell us that this is nothing, and IEDs go off all the time.
fuzzy wrote:comhcinc wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/104wySk.png
Brive1987 wrote:Heina has emerged from the Carrier Zone to write a couple of posts trying to raise money forAfghan bombing orphanscats.
Meanwhile the dick remains sheathed but ready to pounce.
No warning is enough.Brive1987 wrote:But it involves SZvan which is poly-warning enough.
When did she steal MacGyvers' hair and what do you think she did with the rest of him?Ape+lust wrote:No warning is enough.Brive1987 wrote:But it involves SZvan which is poly-warning enough.
http://imgur.com/rA0bfus.jpg
When has Aneris defended acts of terrorism?Keating wrote:I'll wait for Aneris to tell us that this is nothing, and IEDs go off all the time.
And practice, practice, practice.comslave wrote:Islam needs quality control. You can't just take in everyone or you will just end up looking stupid.comslave wrote:It appears only the bomber died. It's like they're not even trying anymore.
Sometimes the abyss wins.feathers wrote:When has Aneris defended acts of terrorism?Keating wrote:I'll wait for Aneris to tell us that this is nothing, and IEDs go off all the time.
You people are getting nasty.
I actually agree with Clarence 's point but there is another important factor at play. In the 60's and most of the 70's young starry eyed teeners having a 1 night standard with their "idol" would not be seen as an issue and complainants were quite often brushed off by the Police. There was some truth in the fear that they wouldn't be listened to. I do think the pendulum has swung too far the other way but it would've been very difficult to raise a complaint then and stick to it.Clarence wrote:As far back as the early 60's?Shatterface wrote: You know, they never actually put Hitler on trial?
There's a difference between skepticism and la la la can't hear you. Accusations against Savile were made as far back as the early Sixties. Why? Because people were hoping he'd get rich, some irrelevant shit would happen on US campuses, and fifty-plus years later his accusers would get a pension?
Wow! You'd never have guessed that he had already been a DJ, sport person, and radio personality by then, would you?
And that just about anyone who comes into contact with large amounts of teens or kids over a long period of time gets rumors and accusations of this sort thrown about them.
No one ever substantiated any of those , now, did they?
It's interesting that you think accusation = guilt esp when accusation:
A. Is allowed for things that allegedly happened decades ago
B. No one has yet been punished for lying, even though some claimants won't get money because as Anna Racoon notes, their stories were found to be physically impossible
C. You get money if your accusation is not disproven. In short, its not up to you to prove anything, its up to his estate to disprove it.
D. Did I mention you get to make your accusations anonymously?
That you find any 'truth' in this kind of 'investigation' is on you.
You need IED construction classes so that IED's can be made safely and reliably. And to disagree is to be a racist. To disagree is to be literally killing Muslims in Germany.Aneris wrote:I have just learned about it, and German news report, citing the mayor Ms Seidel, that they assume an explosive caused it.Keating wrote:I'll wait for Aneris to tell us that this is nothing, and IEDs go off all the time.
You need IED construction classes so that IED's can be made safely and reliably. And to disagree is to be a racist. To disagree is to be literally killing Muslims in Germany.Aneris wrote:I have just learned about it, and German news report, citing the mayor Ms Seidel, that they assume an explosive caused it.Keating wrote:I'll wait for Aneris to tell us that this is nothing, and IEDs go off all the time.
It's weird how governments all seem to be in damage control mode, contra the tide of social media and people armed with portable hires cameras. For each such blunder the extreme right gains more ground.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:A rather... interesting development regarding the Nice attack:
The policewoman responsible for video surveillance the evening of the attack has stated in an interview that she had been pressured by the ministry of interior to provide one non-editable report and one editable report.
Bernard Cazeneuve (minister of interior) has announced he will sue the policewoman for defamation. The city of Nice has announced they stand behind the policewoman.
Also, the ministry has requested the video footage of the attack be erased (to avoid leaks on the internet, they say). The city of Nice has refused the request.
Looks like we're not faring any better than Germany...
If have less contempt for Clarence if he hadn't pulled the 'I get it - you hate Pakis' dismissal of the Rotherham abuse.Malky wrote:I actually agree with Clarence 's point but there is another important factor at play. In the 60's and most of the 70's young starry eyed teeners having a 1 night standard with their "idol" would not be seen as an issue and complainants were quite often brushed off by the Police. There was some truth in the fear that they wouldn't be listened to. I do think the pendulum has swung too far the other way but it would've been very difficult to raise a complaint then and stick to it.
Yes that was not a clever stance - this area was also a difficult one to raise a complaint as tbe girls were white trash andthe Police were terrified of being called racistShatterface wrote:If have less contempt for Clarence if he hadn't pulled the 'I get it - you hate Pakis' dismissal of the Rotherham abuse.Malky wrote:I actually agree with Clarence 's point but there is another important factor at play. In the 60's and most of the 70's young starry eyed teeners having a 1 night standard with their "idol" would not be seen as an issue and complainants were quite often brushed off by the Police. There was some truth in the fear that they wouldn't be listened to. I do think the pendulum has swung too far the other way but it would've been very difficult to raise a complaint then and stick to it.
I didn't suggest that. I'm merely a little surprised by Aneris' continuing naiveté. There are circumstances where a government funded news organisation would have reason to lie or spin a story. Being government funded is not protection from politics and building a narrative.feathers wrote:When has Aneris defended acts of terrorism?Keating wrote:I'll wait for Aneris to tell us that this is nothing, and IEDs go off all the time.
You people are getting nasty.
Aneris is a terrorist? Well I never. :think:feathers wrote:When has Aneris defended acts of terrorism?Keating wrote:I'll wait for Aneris to tell us that this is nothing, and IEDs go off all the time.
You people are getting nasty.
I would love to see the Liberal Coalition get the ABC to lie for it. :lol: :lol:Keating wrote:I didn't suggest that. I'm merely a little surprised by Aneris' continuing naiveté. There are circumstances where a government funded news organisation would have reason to lie or spin a story. Being government funded is not protection from politics and building a narrative.feathers wrote:When has Aneris defended acts of terrorism?Keating wrote:I'll wait for Aneris to tell us that this is nothing, and IEDs go off all the time.
You people are getting nasty.
The BBC reported the incident with this title 'Syrian migrant dies in German blast', and the BBC is government funded. There have been instances where the Australian Broadcasting Commission has done the same; not out right lied, but certainly spun stories in the government's favour. It would require extraordinary evidence to convince me that similar efforts were not being done in the German media. I'm absolutely not saying that they're all dishonest, and everything reported is a lie, just that governments can and do lie to the public, and they will use any means at their disposal.
Aneris doesn't seem to be that naive, but there seems to be a strange new narrative in the making that the ZDF is a sort of Pravda, controlled by apparatsik Merkel. That is absurd; the European countries are rife with state-owned or -sponsored broadcasters which all have a (very) large degree of editorial freedom. They possibly have more elbow room than some of the tycoon-owned private media outlets. Aneris seems to be pointing out that there is no evidence that the ZDF is more manipulated than any other station.Keating wrote:I didn't suggest that. I'm merely a little surprised by Aneris' continuing naiveté. There are circumstances where a government funded news organisation would have reason to lie or spin a story. Being government funded is not protection from politics and building a narrative.
I believe that if you hold the view that newspapers have difficulty just reporting the facts, and that it steadily goes downhill from there, you can not go wrong.Keating wrote: The BBC reported the incident with this title 'Syrian migrant dies in German blast', and the BBC is government funded. There have been instances where the Australian Broadcasting Commission has done the same; not out right lied, but certainly spun stories in the government's favour. It would require extraordinary evidence to convince me that similar efforts were not being done in the German media. I'm absolutely not saying that they're all dishonest, and everything reported is a lie, just that governments can and do lie to the public, and they will use any means at their disposal.
And why would the Moaris not also be introduced predators as well as whites?HunnyBunny wrote: Cunt.
Twitter is so predictable these days.
MarcusAu wrote:insinct ? Is that the opposite of extinct?
Whatever racial divisions there are in NZ - you would be hard pressed to find any full-blooded Maori left.
I even wrote that the ZDF is not totally free — if indeed any news are — but specifically stated that they have to be careful how they approach items and that they are public, not private. This means that their editorial direction is generally in line with centrist and mainstream views. They won't fundamentally undermine capitalism, laud the democratic take of China or focus on refugees behaving badly as Breitbart and Pegida and such people want.feathers wrote:Aneris doesn't seem to be that naive, but there seems to be a strange new narrative in the making that the ZDF is a sort of Pravda, controlled by apparatsik Merkel. That is absurd; the European countries are rife with state-owned or -sponsored broadcasters which all have a (very) large degree of editorial freedom. They possibly have more elbow room than some of the tycoon-owned private media outlets. Aneris seems to be pointing out that there is no evidence that the ZDF is more manipulated than any other station.Keating wrote:I didn't suggest that. I'm merely a little surprised by Aneris' continuing naiveté. There are circumstances where a government funded news organisation would have reason to lie or spin a story. Being government funded is not protection from politics and building a narrative.
I'm sure the Moa would agree. But we must judge the Maori by their standards at the time. It's only white people who must be judged by currents standards for historical actions.Malky wrote:And why would the Moaris not also be introduced predators as well as whitesHunnyBunny wrote: Cunt.
Twitter is so predictable these days.
It's from the Daily Fail, though, so who knows. :bjarte:Munich authorities say a 16-year-old Afghan friend of the Munich attacker who killed nine people in a rampage before killing himself may have known of the attack in advance.
Police said Monday the 16-year-old was arrested late Sunday and investigators were able to retrieve a deleted chat between him and the attacker on the messaging app WhatsApp.
Police say that from the chat it appears that the 16-year-old met with the attacker at the scene of the rampage — a mall in Munich — before the attack. He also knew the attacker had a pistol.
Investigators say the two teenagers met last year as in-patients at a psychiatric ward. Both were being treated for online game addiction, among other things.
When someone sets off a backpack bomb filled with nails and other bits of metal at a crowded outdoor venue, even liberal East Coast Americans call it a terrorist attack.Herrmann said the attacker's backpack contained screws and nails, in an apparent bid to inflict widespread damage.