Has she just dressed that poor mutt in a pair of 'mugfriend' Chris's old boxer shorts?
No wonder the thing looks permantly depressed.
Glad I checked before posting. He's spot on.Bhurzum wrote:Pie on the recent stateside civil unrest...
[youtube][/youtube]
"Sack of minge" - added to vocabulary :lol:
I once enjoyed the True Taste of Scotland in a pub in Edinburgh. Sunday morning, hung over, looking for hair of the dog and comfort food. Ordered nachos. When the food came out, the landlord confessed the sour cream had gone bad, so he had substituted mayo.
You're merely repeating the half-truth of Patriarchy Theory. You (and Olympe de Gouge & today's Feminism) see only the way wives were subordinate to husbands, ignoring the ways husbands were subordinate to wives... such as a husband being jailed on behalf of his wife for her unpaid debts, or the husband being jailed for failing to control his wife, if she assaulted someone.Kirbmarc wrote: The subordination of women to their husbands was a thing.
I just came down from the mountain. 1 hour ride on the bike in non-stop rain, temperatures ranging from 3° to 5° (Celsius). I'm not sure I've ever been that soaked and freezing before.Brive1987 wrote:It's 37 degrees. I'm sick of this weather.
That dog is crying out for a Matt Taylor shirt shoop.shoutinghorse wrote:
Has she just dressed that poor mutt in a pair of 'mugfriend' Chris's old boxer shorts?
No wonder the thing looks permantly depressed.
"Edinburgh - a wretched hive of scum and villainy" - Lonely Planet guidebook to Scotland, 2012.dogen wrote:I once enjoyed the True Taste of Scotland in a pub in Edinburgh. Sunday morning, hung over, looking for hair of the dog and comfort food. Ordered nachos. When the food came out, the landlord confessed the sour cream had gone bad, so he had substituted mayo.
Men were jailed for failing to control their wives because wives were assumed to be punished privately, by their husbands, and unable to be responsible of anything.Service Dog wrote:You're merely repeating the half-truth of Patriarchy Theory. You (and Olympe de Gouge & today's Feminism) see only the way wives were subordinate to husbands, ignoring the ways husbands were subordinate to wives... such as a husband being jailed on behalf of his wife for her unpaid debts, or the husband being jailed for failing to control his wife, if she assaulted someone.Kirbmarc wrote: The subordination of women to their husbands was a thing.
Karen Straughan says that half-truth is inadequate for her to endorse feminism-- it skews everything from fair courts to public education to tax-spending to foreign policy to boys' & girls' self-image to relationship advice.
Wait, Canada is "founded on slavery"?! From the wiki:Suet Cardigan wrote:
Note that Canada wasn't even formally Confederated until 1867, and didn't achieve full autonomy until around 1931.By 1800 the other provinces of British North America had effectively limited slavery through court decisions requiring the strictest proof of ownership, which was rarely available. In 1819, John Robinson Attorney General of Upper Canada declared that by residing in Canada, black residents were set free, and that Canadian courts would protect their freedom.
Slave-owning people of what became Canada were, for example, the fishing societies, such as the Yurok, that lived along the Pacific coast from Alaska to California, on what is sometimes described as the Northwest Coast. Many of the indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast, such as the Haida and Tlingit, were traditionally known as fierce warriors and slave-traders, raiding as far as California. Slavery was hereditary, the slaves being prisoners of war and their descendants were slaves. Some tribes in British Columbia continued to segregate and ostracize the descendants of slaves as late as the 1970s.
Among some Pacific Northwest tribes about a quarter of the population were slaves. One slave narrative was composed by an Englishman, John R. Jewitt, who had been taken alive when his ship was captured in 1802; his memoir provides a detailed look at life as a slave, and asserts that a large number were held.
Black Lives Matter is sadly infested with black supremacists who think whites are guilty of being white, like these people. Trudeau is white so he's a white supremacist terrorist. By making a genuine concern about police brutality all about race the SJWs have made the black supremacists feel right, but as well know racism against white people isn't racism because whites have power.Wild Zontargs wrote:Suet Cardigan wrote:
Those of us not near a screening can pre-order the DVD or Blu-Ray disk, and find links to the movie on iTunes and Netflix at http://theredpillmovie.com/DrokkIt wrote:So I just watched the The Red Pill documentary and have literally no other avenue to discuss so sharing my thoughts here:
Firstly I thought the film maker did a good job and showed the human impact of these issues. In my view she went into the project with a critical or even dismissive opinion about the people behind the MRA movement and this made the film pretty balanced by virtue of basic resistance to the ideas being presented by the interviewees.
I think it would be fair to say that this dismissive stance is probably the cultural norm. I think it would have been very easy for Cassie Jaye to have simply made a film attacking these people, and it would probably make for a much bigger commercial success. That kind of true journalistic impulse is to be lauded, especially given the current fake-news mores of the press.
It seemed fairly evident that prominent feminists were loath to be interviewed for this project, and with good reason. The few that do appear are simply given enough rope and come of pretty callous, which resonates with the personal narrative being told regarding Jaye's attempts to hold onto her feminist values in the face of what she is learning. She does a lot of work verifying all the factual and statistical points, much more than you'd get in a standard documentary about some cause.
There is a lot I don't find personally appealing about some of the men involved with this: both Paul Elam and Dean Esme usually seem deeply christian-conservative when you read their writing. Esme especially comes off very awkwardly in this; Elam acquits himself a lot better and seems more likeable.
Ultimately this film humanises these people and humanises the movement they are working on, I can see why it is being so vehemently opposed by feminist organisations. This could well change some minds or at least find a path to common ground for discussing what are very real problems. Real no matter what you think has caused them.
The circumcision stuff was very brief but I found it an exceptionally difficult scene to watch.
I'll see your Ryan Reynolds and raise you...Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Best. Canadian. Ever!
http://nerdist.com/wp-content/uploads/2 ... -image.jpg
CostaSinistra -> Douglas
2h ago
Douglas, it sounds like you're saying that it's the responsibility of the listener whether or not to take up arms after listening to people like Yiannopoulos and Spencer. That's a fair answer. How do you then stop them from committing hate crimes? Can they even be stopped?
What was the horrible comment, that the sensitive souls who read the Guardian are not allowed to read? This:Hermann Steinpilz -> CostaSinistra
1h ago
This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs.
Apparently, you can accuse Milo of committing hate crimes on the Grauniad, but islamists are above criticism. Quelle surprise. This is how the regressive left gives away the game.How would you stop islamist preachers who preach that women who refuse to wear the hijab are sluts, and who call for gays to be killed?
I think that it's because Bissonette's motives were and still are unclear. He hasn't written or said anything about why he shot up a mosque. He seemed to troll SJWs on facebook and be a fan of some conservative bloggers but there's no evidence that he expressed any murderous or violent intent against muslims before. Unlike, say, Brievik or the Unabomber or muslim terrorists Bissonette isn't providing the press with anything to talk about. Since he's still alive they're probably waiting to see if he says something during the trial.rayshul wrote:Here's a quick question. Alexandre Bisonette, who should have been a huge "win" for the political left, has completely disappeared from the media. What the fuck happened? Did something new about this guy come out or are they just trying to hide these things?
It just seems very odd.
Presumably his lawyer has convinced him to keep quiet. Typically in Canada the police and prosecution release very little information until the trial.Kirbmarc wrote:I think that it's because Bissonette's motives were and still are unclear. He hasn't written or said anything about why he shot up a mosque. He seemed to troll SJWs on facebook and be a fan of some conservative bloggers but there's no evidence that he expressed any murderous or violent intent against muslims before. Unlike, say, Brievik or the Unabomber or muslim terrorists Bissonette isn't providing the press with anything to talk about. Since he's still alive they're probably waiting to see if he says something during the trial.rayshul wrote:Here's a quick question. Alexandre Bisonette, who should have been a huge "win" for the political left, has completely disappeared from the media. What the fuck happened? Did something new about this guy come out or are they just trying to hide these things?
It just seems very odd.
Fuck yeah. This guy hit the nail on Trump, he's hitting the nail on the idiotic Berkeley riots. Somebody should project this video in a DNC meeting.Bhurzum wrote:Pie on the recent stateside civil unrest...
[youtube][/youtube]
"Sack of minge" - added to vocabulary :lol:
Thanks for the info. I actually think that this is a good approach to the complex relationship between the media and the justice system. He's in police custody and has admitted to the crime, there's no need for the public to know more than that at this point.free thoughtpolice wrote:Presumably his lawyer has convinced him to keep quiet. Typically in Canada the police and prosecution release very little information until the trial.
Are they really black supremacists or do they just want good things for black people and bad things for white?Kirbmarc wrote:Black Lives Matter is sadly infested with black supremacists who think whites are guilty of being white, like these people. Trudeau is white so he's a white supremacist terrorist. By making a genuine concern about police brutality all about race the SJWs have made the black supremacists feel right, but as well know racism against white people isn't racism because whites have power.
Isn't that the definition of black supremacy?Billie from Ockham wrote:Are they really black supremacists or do they just want good things for black people and bad things for white?Kirbmarc wrote:Black Lives Matter is sadly infested with black supremacists who think whites are guilty of being white, like these people. Trudeau is white so he's a white supremacist terrorist. By making a genuine concern about police brutality all about race the SJWs have made the black supremacists feel right, but as well know racism against white people isn't racism because whites have power.
Ah. OK. I thought that "supremacist" also meant "believing that one race is deserving of a dominant or superior place in society". A quick look at the dictionary tells me this isn't the case.Billie from Ockham wrote:I've always used the word "supremacist" to refer to people who believe that a given race is superior to another. The label I use for those who want stuff for some people and not others, based only on race, is "racist asshole."
I have met blacks who simultaneously believe that they are inferior in several ways to both white and asians, and that they ought to be given things that white and asians shouldn't get. I have also met a few women who have the same beliefs v-a-v men. One defense of having these two views is that giving things to inferior people "levels the playing field" (and that's a direct quote). In any event, I like to keep the two sets of belief separate.Kirbmarc wrote:Anyway I see little political and practical difference between "I believe that this race is superior to another" and "I believe that this race should get good things and this other race should get bad things".
Unfortunately this is only an argument the Libertarian right are prepared to make.Kirbmarc wrote:A rational left could have made legitimate arguments about the reality of police brutality, the negative consequences of the militarization of the police and of "tough on crime" law, the social problems of poor, disenfranchised communities and their relations with law enforcement and the justice system in general.
I wonder if it was deiberate that between his swept-over hair and the shadow beneath his nose, he looked like Hitler.Kirbmarc wrote:Fuck yeah. This guy hit the nail on Trump, he's hitting the nail on the idiotic Berkeley riots. Somebody should project this video in a DNC meeting.Bhurzum wrote:Pie on the recent stateside civil unrest...
[youtube][/youtube]
"Sack of minge" - added to vocabulary :lol:
I wonder if it was deiberate that between his swept-over hair and the shadow beneath his nose, he looked like Hitler.[/quote]ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Fuck yeah. This guy hit the nail on Trump, he's hitting the nail on the idiotic Berkeley riots. Somebody should project this video in a DNC meeting.Kirbmarc wrote:
"Sack of minge" - added to vocabulary :lol:
Haha!!! Yes, watching more he definitely is doing it deliberately, with the hand waving and all.[/quote]ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:I wonder if it was deiberate that between his swept-over hair and the shadow beneath his nose, he looked like Hitler.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Fuck yeah. This guy hit the nail on Trump, he's hitting the nail on the idiotic Berkeley riots. Somebody should project this video in a DNC meeting.Kirbmarc wrote:
"Sack of minge" - added to vocabulary :lol:
Haha! Never seen that.Jan Steen wrote:[youtube][/youtube]ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Haha!!! Yes, watching more he definitely is doing it deliberately, with the hand waving and all.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
I wonder if it was deiberate that between his swept-over hair and the shadow beneath his nose, he looked like Hitler.
He's also isolated in a special cell, he's on suicide watch. Here in quebec thing got a bit quieter after some facts became clearer, some example: he has been on anxiety and depression medications for close to 2 years if i remember correctly, he sought help for an alcool problem a couple of time, he was drunk the night of the shooting, he was not a member or a former member of any of the Quebecs extremist/white nationalist groups, some of his friends spoke out and their testimonies make it even more difficult to grasp who Alex is (yeah he was shy but he had friends contrary to what we first believe).free thoughtpolice wrote:Presumably his lawyer has convinced him to keep quiet. Typically in Canada the police and prosecution release very little information until the trial.Kirbmarc wrote:I think that it's because Bissonette's motives were and still are unclear. He hasn't written or said anything about why he shot up a mosque. He seemed to troll SJWs on facebook and be a fan of some conservative bloggers but there's no evidence that he expressed any murderous or violent intent against muslims before. Unlike, say, Brievik or the Unabomber or muslim terrorists Bissonette isn't providing the press with anything to talk about. Since he's still alive they're probably waiting to see if he says something during the trial.rayshul wrote:Here's a quick question. Alexandre Bisonette, who should have been a huge "win" for the political left, has completely disappeared from the media. What the fuck happened? Did something new about this guy come out or are they just trying to hide these things?
It just seems very odd.
MarcusAu wrote:The Red Pill seems to be a more sympathetic (or balanced) view of the MRA / MRM movement, as opposed to the more generally accepted feminist narrative.
However, I'm wondering if it covers the 'manosphere' in general. For example most people would not have much criticism of MGTOWs in principle - but from what I've heard (which is little enough) there are 'deep rifts' between the various groups with the MGTOWs being painted as the 'bad boys'.
Temperatures above freezing on the Celsius scale sound too unimpressive, call it 80 degrees and maybe people will give a shit.
I try not to be obtuse.MarcusAu wrote:80 degrees?
That angle doesn't seem right.
Funny story. Before some facts became clearer, the Globe And Mail and The National Post stated in 2 articles that he was part of some extremist, right wing, white nationalist group named GaucheDroitistan. Well, GaucheDroitistan is a Facebook group that im part of. In short, a group dedicated for the political left and right to argue and throw shit at each other outside of the proverbial echo chamber got the same press treatment that Gamegate or even the Pit itself received. This does not surprise me anymore.pro-boxing-fan wrote:He's also isolated in a special cell, he's on suicide watch. Here in quebec thing got a bit quieter after some facts became clearer, some example: he has been on anxiety and depression medications for close to 2 years if i remember correctly, he sought help for an alcool problem a couple of time, he was drunk the night of the shooting, he was not a member or a former member of any of the Quebecs extremist/white nationalist groups, some of his friends spoke out and their testimonies make it even more difficult to grasp who Alex is (yeah he was shy but he had friends contrary to what we first believe).
Lots of media are still pushing the blame on Quebec city conservative radios, although to this day, i have not seen evidences he was an avid listener or a fan of one or several of the most right wing radio host. For context, the province of Quebec is by large a progressive place and as such almost nobody here listen to conservative radio with one major exception: the Quebec City area. Also, since most media are progressive and concentrated in Montreal, there has always been a lot of hate for Quebec radios coming from the establishment. "Radios de Quebec" and "radio poubelle" are 2 popular pejorative expressions that are thrown around quite often, even by some of the most respected journalist.
A cute joke, well done.TheMudbrooker wrote:I try not to be obtuse.MarcusAu wrote:80 degrees?
That angle doesn't seem right.
pro-boxing-fan wrote:Did i killed the pitt? Am i that boring? :twatson:
Weaksauce, Carrier. If you pull rank on people rather than engaging with their arguments as a Ph.D. then I tend to think you were given the degree in error. Saying "I have a Ph.D. so I won't deal with your arguments about my subject of expertise" is pathetic.Lochness_Hamster wrote: Should Carrier really be playing this card?
The Funny thing is, the man he is tweeting at is Jonathon Tweet on of the Creators of 3rd Edition of Dungeons and Dragons, so all in all JT, has sold more books as an author than RC
http://prospect.org/article/impeachment ... ’s-removalMalky wrote:New Blog appearing called "Opposing Trump" - collects links and article about people who are trying to get or talking about Trump's removal as President. Interesting take on removing Trump via the 25th Amendment. Why was this one brought in?
https://opposingtrumpblog.wordpress.com ... s-removal/
For the record, I don't. I just assumed you could not kill the pitt with your post. Leaving me next in line.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:pro-boxing-fan wrote:Did i killed the pitt? Am i that boring? :twatson:
Asking this after I posted would suggest you have me on ignore, which leads me to ask the same question of myself.
I guess for non-american its a good way to learn more on the constitution. Stuff you don't generally learn from the general discourse.Malky wrote:http://prospect.org/article/impeachment ... ’s-removalMalky wrote:New Blog appearing called "Opposing Trump" - collects links and article about people who are trying to get or talking about Trump's removal as President. Interesting take on removing Trump via the 25th Amendment. Why was this one brought in?
https://opposingtrumpblog.wordpress.com ... s-removal/
Direct link to article
Although tot is interesting stuff, this reminds me of all the right wing masturbatory fantasies about removing Bill Clinton back in the nineties. (As well as those for Bush2 and Obama)Malky wrote:New Blog appearing called "Opposing Trump" - collects links and article about people who are trying to get or talking about Trump's removal as President. Interesting take on removing Trump via the 25th Amendment. Why was this one brought in?
https://opposingtrumpblog.wordpress.com ... s-removal/
It all does seem a bit desparate ( at bit like remain voters trying to get a new referendum) but I was wondering was there any mileage in this? As an outsider nearly all USA politics seems insane bu it is difficult to see Trump lasting a full term if his behaviour is not modified in some way.Spike13 wrote:Although tot is interesting stuff, this reminds me of all the right wing masturbatory fantasies about removing Bill Clinton back in the nineties. (As well as those for Bush2 and Obama)Malky wrote:New Blog appearing called "Opposing Trump" - collects links and article about people who are trying to get or talking about Trump's removal as President. Interesting take on removing Trump via the 25th Amendment. Why was this one brought in?
https://opposingtrumpblog.wordpress.com ... s-removal/
Curiously, this has a similar life cycle to the "government is making prison camps to round us up!" Hysteria which I noticed for the first time during the Clinton presidency.
Did Lincoln get help from Russian spies when he got elected? :PSpike13 wrote:by way of historical comparison, which seems to all the rage on the internet, I propose the the election and assumption of office of Trump has more parallels with the election of Lincoln then if does the rise of the Nazis.
Lincoln got elected, lots of folks lost their shit.
I think there had to be more than just touching involved.ERV wrote:Parents finally got their 23andMe back!
British, Jewish, 'northwestern european', and just a toooouch of Asian.
Everyone laughed at me at Christmas when I said there was Asian in our family. I knew it. I had like a 24 point powerpoint presentation on "Why there is totally Asian up in here". I fucking KNEW IT!