Kirbmarc wrote: ↑
free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑
Kirbmarc wrote: ↑
There's a huge circle-jerk in the Regressive side of Twitter which is now angry at Harris and calling him a Nazi because he dared to suggest that there might be a genetic component to differences in IQ. Sacha Saeen, Werleman, Dan Arel, Johnny Spooner, it's a veritable Who's Who of the islam apologists. I expect Myers to weigh in on this argument soon enough, naturally shitting on Harris like he's always done.
Just like the prophecy in the Bible, perfectly accurate in predicting things after they happened. :P
http://archive.is/hJspn
PZ Myers wrote:As for intelligence, the entire point of the human brain is plasticity and sensitivity to experience and novelty. There is no such thing as high intelligence — but there is such a thing as high adaptability. Since intelligence is actually a response to the environment, it’s disappointing and absurd that there are actually scientists arguing for some mysterious hard-wiring of the brain for some difficult to describe ability like “performance on IQ tests”. Don’t they realize that that’s the antithesis of what human intelligence is?
In this paragraph Myers now not simply arguing that environmental effects have a bigger impact than genetics on intelligence differences between individuals, which is a reasonable position to have even if one admits that there is a genetic component. He's also not just arguing that average differences in IQ between social groups are more to environmental than to genetic causes, which is still a reasonable position to have, and actually not the same thing as the previous claim, since there could easily be groups distributions where differences in average IQ between groups are due more to environmental causes even if genetic factors cause a larger parts of the differences between individuals.
No, he's straight out denying the existence of intelligence differences as measured by IQ tests. :bjarte:
That's actually ableist, if you think about it, because it's erasing the fact that there some people with cognitive issues who score very low on those tests. Is Myers saying that those people are simply "not adaptable" enough? Is he denying that they're cognitively challenged? Is he basically saying that they should just apply themselves more, and be more "plastic"? I didn't know that Peeze was such a bigot as to imply that people with cognitive issues should just be exposed to better stimuli and then they'd be be fine.
But maybe I'm misreading Peezie. Maybe he wants to say that cognitive issues are just a social construct, and so it's not true that some people require assistance in some tasks, it's just our phallo-centric colonial white supremacist society that makes it so, in reality there's no difference between Einstein and Forrest Gump, it's just that we classify one as a genius and the other as someone with special cognitive needs because we're being brainwashed by our own bigotry.
Jesus, I was organizing bookmarks and thought "damn, I haven't been here in years.' And after reading a few pages, I'm so glad I've long since given up on the whole Atheist/Skeptic movement. It's overly populated with complete fucking idiots and PZ Myers is their Emperor.
As for his anti-science assertion encapsulated above, it is, and has been for a very, very, very, very, very long time, well established that IQ and mental health each have a substantial genetic component and environmental component. To assert one source over the other or the non-existence of one source is pure horseshit.
High IQs run in families (predominantly X chromosome with other factors). Many mental illnesses (schizophrenia and bi-polar for example) run in families. Many physical issues (Huntington's disease) run in families.
And, in the end, your base, from which you'll deviate from environmental factors, is set by genes.
Anyway, back to other things. The Atheist movement was train-wrecked by the SJWs, just like they're train-wreck everything else. And I just, honestly, don't see the point in it.