It honestly doesn't bother me. I just kinda allow my eyes to glaze over it and just move on.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Both are moderators and cannot be put on ignore. There is a thread for the ethnostate crap, but Brive insists on our attention here.
This pretty much sums up the last two months of Ethno-Brive drivel. The Trad-thots identitarianism is just as laughable as the intersectonal feminists. The latter just don't go for that healthy blond look. Not that I blame you - I've rubbed one out to Southern a few times.Kirbmarc wrote: ↑ Me, idiot: "Louis Farrakhan is a virulent anti-semitic and anti-white racist, Tamika Mallory and Linda Sarsour are whitewashing his ideas by presenting him as a dissident preacher persecuted by white supremacy"
You, genius: "Yeah, that's fair. She's really dishonest".
Me, idiot: "The Qu'ran is full of terrible messages, the muslim apologists are whitewashing its message by cherry-picking the best parts and presenting the book as a religion of peace, and all criticism as religious persecution"
You, genius: "True, true, how can they be so defensive and dishonest?"
After a while....
Me, still an idiot: "Aleksandr Dugin is a reactionary supporter of political violence, Southern is whitewashing his ideas by presenting him as a dissident intellectual persecuted by the Liberal Establishment."
You, genius: "How dare you reveal these things to the audience, are you implying that they can't think for themselves? You should be ashamed of your liberal censorship! Ashamed, I say!"
FUUUUUUUUUUUCK!CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Both are moderators and cannot be put on ignore. There is a thread for the ethnostate crap, but Brive insists on our attention here.
That was Gad Saad made the offer.fuzzy wrote: ↑I didn't want to deal with nationalpost's adblock policy, so found this on Toronto Sun: http://torontosun.com/news/national/lau ... ech-abusesscrewtape wrote: ↑ Lindsay Shepherd sues WLU.
She has realised they have made her unemployable. I hope she wins.
I rfemember Peterson saw this coming way back in the first few days when the two talked, and he pretty much offered to take her into his university program for further academic pursuits if/when such blackballing were to happen ... ...
I really hope you're right. What I see on campuses right now is very concerning. I don't just mean media reports, but my daughter's college campus and some others we've visited. This isn't just an abstraction, but an ongoing phenomenon. Hopefully the pendulum is going back.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑That was Gad Saad made the offer.fuzzy wrote: ↑I didn't want to deal with nationalpost's adblock policy, so found this on Toronto Sun: http://torontosun.com/news/national/lau ... ech-abusesscrewtape wrote: ↑ Lindsay Shepherd sues WLU.
She has realised they have made her unemployable. I hope she wins.
I rfemember Peterson saw this coming way back in the first few days when the two talked, and he pretty much offered to take her into his university program for further academic pursuits if/when such blackballing were to happen ... ...
I think Haidt's concept of two types of university - free inquiry vs. social justice - competing on the market, will come to pass.
Students with any ambition whatsoever are opting out of Social Justice universities. Employers want people who can do the job and don't want to use their resources to further another agenda. They'd rather take on unqualified staff and train them up than employ a ticking time bomb.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑That was Gad Saad made the offer.
I think Haidt's concept of two types of university - free inquiry vs. social justice - competing on the market, will come to pass.
Perhaps Universities can follow the Liberty or BYU model. The SJ Uni's can make their speech & behaviour codes explicit (if they are not already). And any institute of higher learning that wants to take a different tack. Both will have limitations on what they consider to be 'free inquiry' and will define it accordingly.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ That was Gad Saad made the offer.
I think Haidt's concept of two types of university - free inquiry vs. social justice - competing on the market, will come to pass.
I disagree with Peterson a great deal but he is a a serious figure, not a genocidal lunatic.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Nobody is arguing that Southern be shut up or fired, they're criticizing her for giving a softball interview to a nut-job. Same as we would for somebody giving SocJus as softball interview. You challenge bad ideas.
Not entirely sure what point you're trying to make here. If Britain is somehow representative of all the West, and these two bagheads are somehow representative of a civilisation crushing decline, then I can only say that it's an exceedingly slow decline. I recall seeing similar drunken street arguments between semi-coherent mutants way back in the gloriously un-PC era of the seventies, when we had Bernard Manning on the telly. It really is nothing new. Observe something like Hogarth's Gin Lane, rendered in 1751, and you'll find that public drunken fuckwittery in the UK is really old hat. If immigration is somehow responsible for this sort of thing, then blame the Scots, as Glaswegians certainly tend to be over-represented in the public-drunken-bawling community in England. With the Irish a close second.
So That's England fucked then, what with all them darkies playing, not diverse enough huh? :roll: .. Makes a change from blaming the Manager, penalties, the off-side rule, referees, too many foreigners in the Premier League, Arsene Wenger/Jose Mourinho/Alex Ferguson, David Beckham's metatarsal, Wayne Rooney sent off, too tired, weather too hot, hooligans, Tommy Robinson, everyone hates us, light years behind everyone else, not enough youth coaches, Glenn Hoddle's a prat, Gary Lineker's a cunt and the myriad of other excuses we get after every tournament where we're shite. :eusa-hand:
My friend's daughter started as a freshman at Harvard last year. She told me every one of her classes started with announcements of preferred personal pronouns. Every single one.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑I really hope you're right. What I see on campuses right now is very concerning. I don't just mean media reports, but my daughter's college campus and some others we've visited. This isn't just an abstraction, but an ongoing phenomenon. Hopefully the pendulum is going back.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ I think Haidt's concept of two types of university - free inquiry vs. social justice - competing on the market, will come to pass.
If certain schools develop a reputation for churning out SJW zealots, any employer would be out of their mind to hire its grads. You could bet on your new hire throwing infantile temper tantrums, filing micro-aggression claims with HR, protesting the cafeteria's latest cultural appropriation, demanding paid time off to 'process' the latest petty criminal getting his just desserts innocent unarmed black body erased by the fascist police state, and so on ad infinitum. Fucking nightmare.Shatterface wrote: ↑ Students with any ambition whatsoever are opting out of Social Justice universities. Employers want people who can do the job and don't want to use their resources to further another agenda. They'd rather take on unqualified staff and train them up than employ a ticking time bomb.
I don't have to play, but I'm pretty sure Fuzzy wants to know where you live so there can be an exchange of man hugs.
Yeah, the first I saw of it was courtesy of that paragon of journalistic integrity, Paul J Watson.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑
This seems a popular rumor on Twitter ATM. If there is any truth to it, does this seem like a good idea?
I'm pretty sure that TR fans wouldn't post deceptive tweets. :drool:CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑
This seems a popular rumor on Twitter ATM. If there is any truth to it, does this seem like a good idea?
According to Wikipedia and what people have said Tommy doesn't have a problem with Muslims. Just those rape gangs. Remember he isn't an ultra right wing bigot. So no problems right?CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑
This seems a popular rumor on Twitter ATM. If there is any truth to it, does this seem like a good idea?
Why complain about being "silenced" but self censor the word "rape"?CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑
This seems a popular rumor on Twitter ATM. If there is any truth to it, does this seem like a good idea?
PZ makes a prediction:The incidence of female students experiencing unwanted sexual attention or sexual coercion was lower, ranging in both Texas and Pennsylvania between 2% and 5% for the former and about 1% for the latter.
Of course, the comments mainly talk about how this is a proof of rape culture.I have a prediction: there are going to be people who are only going to see the 1% number and are going to argue that because it’s so low, sexual harassment isn’t a problem.
https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/longfor ... estry-testHeredity or hoax?: When Louis Côté became suspicious about a Toronto-based laboratory that tests DNA ancestry for a self-proclaimed Indigenous group, he decided to try an experiment by submitting a sample from his dog for analysis. He was told his chihuahua had Abenaki and Mohawk ancestry.
It's 'rope gangs'. You can't call them lunch mobs anymore because it's not PC.InfraRedBucket wrote: ↑Why complain about being "silenced" but self censor the word "rape"?CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑
This seems a popular rumor on Twitter ATM. If there is any truth to it, does this seem like a good idea?
Twitter doesnt ban that word.
It is hard to believe that the UK government want mosques to be subject to arson attacks or whatever else people will do if Tommy Robinson is murdered in jail by adherents of a religion of peace.Tigzy wrote: ↑ 114,000 followers. 296 retweets at the time of writing this. Judging from the time stamps on the replies, this tweet is an hour old (again, at the time of writing this).
Still no information from a reputable source on. Still no info on which UK prison has a 70% muslim population. Also - Arab?? I thought the defendants in the case which saw Tommy violate the requirements of his suspended sentence were of Pakistani heritage.
It would be great if we could get more details on all this. But the narrative must drive on, regardless.
I thought it was ripe gangs that go around offending decent people with their halal smell.Shatterface wrote: ↑It's 'rope gangs'. You can't call them lunch mobs anymore because it's not PC.InfraRedBucket wrote: ↑Why complain about being "silenced" but self censor the word "rape"?CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑
This seems a popular rumor on Twitter ATM. If there is any truth to it, does this seem like a good idea?
Twitter doesnt ban that word.
And yet when the blasphemy law is repealed, Peezus will somehow describe it as a disaster for social justice simply because he can't stand the fact that Mick Nugent actually gets things done. You just know he will.
On the one hand it was a vaguely funny bum-fight in a suit. On the other it raised questions of the reality vs myth of “the West” in a self depreciating manner.Tigzy wrote: ↑Not entirely sure what point you're trying to make here. If Britain is somehow representative of all the West, and these two bagheads are somehow representative of a civilisation crushing decline, then I can only say that it's an exceedingly slow decline. I recall seeing similar drunken street arguments between semi-coherent mutants way back in the gloriously un-PC era of the seventies, when we had Bernard Manning on the telly. It really is nothing new. Observe something like Hogarth's Gin Lane, rendered in 1751, and you'll find that public drunken fuckwittery in the UK is really old hat. If immigration is somehow responsible for this sort of thing, then blame the Scots, as Glaswegians certainly tend to be over-represented in the public-drunken-bawling community in England. With the Irish a close second.
I bet that he will not say anything about it, or if he will he will not mention Nugent at all.
Says the guy who thinks that civil libertarians and SJWs are one and the same, all "libtards".Brive1987 wrote: ↑Overall, this exercise has demonstrated to me that not even liberals will hold out charity to their ideological enemies. Nuance, subtlety and the teasing out of complex ideas is as prescribed here by some, as anywhere else. Issues are comfortably black and white when you have the certainty of objective right and wrong.
Yes, we, the ones who point out that Dugin wants a genocide of cretins/a bastard race in the Ukraine, all while the Russian government is involved in a war in the Ukraine, are the overly triggered and emotional ones.Plus there is a hair-trigger for these professed rationalists that quickly kicks the debate into an emotional tail spin. With tears.
Absolutely intriguing.
Christ, I just pop in to see how you wankers are doing and now my sides are in orbit, fucking lol.
The only tears here are Aussie. You're the one dropping things without nuance, then grandstanding when somebody calls your latest bimbo out for bad ideas. Way to nuance, yep.Brive1987 wrote: ↑On the one hand it was a vaguely funny bum-fight in a suit. On the other it raised questions of the reality vs myth of “the West” in a self depreciating manner.Tigzy wrote: ↑Not entirely sure what point you're trying to make here. If Britain is somehow representative of all the West, and these two bagheads are somehow representative of a civilisation crushing decline, then I can only say that it's an exceedingly slow decline. I recall seeing similar drunken street arguments between semi-coherent mutants way back in the gloriously un-PC era of the seventies, when we had Bernard Manning on the telly. It really is nothing new. Observe something like Hogarth's Gin Lane, rendered in 1751, and you'll find that public drunken fuckwittery in the UK is really old hat. If immigration is somehow responsible for this sort of thing, then blame the Scots, as Glaswegians certainly tend to be over-represented in the public-drunken-bawling community in England. With the Irish a close second.
...
Overall, this exercise has demonstrated to me that not even liberals will hold out charity to their ideological enemies. Nuance, subtlety and the teasing out of complex ideas is as prescribed here by some, as anywhere else. Issues are comfortably black and white when you have the certainty of objective right and wrong.
Plus there is a hair-trigger for these professed rationalists that quickly kicks the debate into an emotional tail spin. With tears.
Absolutely intriguing.
Ho FFS, where do you even find this stuff. :)CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ DfgaqXnWAAEYxNg.jpeg
https://metro.co.uk/2018/01/18/man-rape ... ssion=true
Not the right approach for incels, IMHO.
IF, and with this lot it's a big IF, TR is in Leicester Prison , at it's inspection in 2014, the Muslim population was around 10%.
Shatterface wrote: ↑I think we are seeing exactly the same attitude towards Russia from the Right that we had from the Left when the Soviets were in charge.
Never mind the corruption - look at the ideals! Murders? What murders? We need strong leadership! So what if free speech and individual rights are restricted? Think of the collective!
Seriously, You think the MSM are on our side in the Western world? They are a bunch of elitist, globalist, corporalist traitors who hate the working class. We need a 'Day of the rope' to wipe out these motherfucking quisling for good. Fuck all 'Journalist' I can't think of one who doesn't deserve to swing or a helicopter ride, scabs the lot of them.Shatterface wrote: ↑I think we are seeing exactly the same attitude towards Russia from the Right that we had from the Left when the Soviets were in charge.
Never mind the corruption - look at the ideals! Murders? What murders? We need strong leadership! So what if free speech and individual rights are restricted? Think of the collective!
MarkB (who's a Robinson supporter, btw) has more recent stats here:InfraRedBucket wrote: ↑ IF, and with this lot it's a big IF, TR is in Leicester Prison , at it's inspection in 2014, the Muslim population was around 10%.
The "white British " population was at just over 62%
Section 6 – Appendix II: Prison population profile:
https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk ... -20131.pdf
More up to date, to compare, the Muslim prison population for all UK prisons was around 4% (Page 14)
http://researchbriefings.files.parliame ... N04334.pdf
The most successful religions adhered to the evolutionary strategy that allowed humans to survive in the first place, what part don't you understand. The whole lefty/liberal love for Islam is just their self hating whiteness and daddy issues, It is hardly rocket science. Once you understand that lefty/liberals are mentally ill retarded mongs then everything they do makes sense.
No, the muslim prison population is 15.2% - the 4% figure is the national population. This means that assuming Robinson is being held in HMP Leicester, he's not in a place where there's a muslim population in excess of the national (prison) average.InfraRedBucket wrote: ↑ More up to date, to compare, the Muslim prison population for all UK prisons was around 4% (Page 14)
http://researchbriefings.files.parliame ... N04334.pdf
Arthur BoydCaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ Brive did get me thinking, to be fair, so I have a question-
There is an undeniable culture in Britain, an empire and many cultural, scientific and philosophical traditions. Same with France, Italy, Spain, etc. You have the Scots, Irish even Welsh history and undeniable culture. But let's say that Trump decides to trade Australia to the Chinese in return for some golf courses, what exact culture would be lost that you couldn't find in an Outback Steakhouse?
