Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/
You're mixing up the characters!Ape+lust wrote: ↑ Well... of course. Dipshits are made from interchangeable parts :D
https://imgur.com/zJExuNP.jpg
Oh... I agree. I am sure part of the balloon snapped into her eye. That hurts like a bitch. I still think it is really funny.... schadenfreude.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑From her reaction I think it is possible that the balloon made contact with her eyeball. Didn't seem to be any histrionics happening and she reacted instantly.
:lol: :lol:Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑You're mixing up the characters!Ape+lust wrote: ↑ Well... of course. Dipshits are made from interchangeable parts :D
https://imgur.com/zJExuNP.jpg
Galen the Elf:
boss_elf.jpg
Santa Peez:
santa.jpg
People have known for decades that as soon as the Black Bloc assholes show up, any pretense of civil protest goes out the window. Plus, you're going to jail. But nowadays everyone just says, "Oh yeah, antifa"...Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Our reclamation project, Facciani, gets it:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/accordingt ... t-helping/
I bet the people protesting at his talks were creationists.Ape+lust wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 2:00 amPeez and his friends are ragging on CH Sommers for whining about her interrupted speech.
Peez is making sure everyone knows he's chill, copacetic, and down with the kids AND the constitution.
https://imgur.com/KE3xoBo.png
More about socially just childcare:And yeah, if my kid wants to be My Little Pony, I'd let them wear an inflatable unicorn horn for as long as they like. Why wouldn't I?
18
•Reply•Share ›
Avatar
WMDKitty -- Survivor InDogITrust • 2 days ago
From the kid who went to school in a fursuit, THANK YOU.
1
•Reply•Share ›
Gosh Soyboy, when does child care degenerate into right wing imposition of will. Maybe when you can't convince your toddler that playing in the road isn't a good idea and you have to forcibly remove them? How about your 8 year old trans vampire son that wants to get his teeth filed and his eyeballs dyed green? There is a fine line in there somewhere isn't there?−
Avatar
SoyCheese • 5 days ago
Fuck the creepy (mostly) right wing attitude that parents basically own their children, and therefore have an absolute right (or really much of any rights, when it's not in the interests of the child) to impose their will onto them. That attitude needs to die a painful and permanent death. Parents are entrusted with the care of their children, and if they are unwilling or unable to properly care for their children, then they should not be permitted to retain custody of them.
26
•Reply•Share ›
Corbyn joins a secret Facebook group which posts antisemitic material, and this does not reflect on him?Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑ Not seeing where Corbyn said anything antisemitic. Do you check all comments in a thread to make sure they are suitable to surround your reply to another commenter?
Weak, just as bad as the Czech spy fabulist nonsense.
CaughtUpLockedOut
Well, that should tickle Peez. Since Dawkins insulted his girlfriend, he's joined fundies in reviling atheists, skeptics, and everyone to the right of Mao. No wonder he gives "protesters" the thumbs up :lol:
That's because no-one has claimed Corbyn said anything antisemitic. Did you actually read my post? No, he was caught posting in an antisemitic Facebook group, and though he himself did not make any antisemitic statements (I'm emphasising this, so you actually get it this time), he had somehow contrived to miss all the antisemitism going on there - because you have to understand that this wasn't some otherwise innocent group which happened to attract some 'Da Goyim Know!' nutballs, but was seriously, seriously steeped in a lot of blatantly anti-Jewish, holocaust denying, Rothschild conspiracy shit.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑ Not seeing where Corbyn said anything antisemitic. Do you check all comments in a thread to make sure they are suitable to surround your reply to another commenter?
Weak, just as bad as the Czech spy fabulist nonsense.
CaughtUpLockedOut
I call bullshit. She's a flopper.John D wrote: ↑Oh... I agree. I am sure part of the balloon snapped into her eye. That hurts like a bitch. I still think it is really funny.... schadenfreude.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑From her reaction I think it is possible that the balloon made contact with her eyeball. Didn't seem to be any histrionics happening and she reacted instantly.
The fact that Watson made such a noise over the Sacha incident confirmed for me that she was exaggerating the level of abuse directed at her. In a nutshell Sacha said she was going to do what Watson most feared, ignore her, at a conference they were both attending and Watson tried to get her barred. Watson then claimed in her talk at the con that Sacha had threatened her and been barred from the con. In reality the organisers had just given an exasperated sigh and registered Sacha under a false name.Ape+lust wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 5:48 amHAW! Yes! Wanted Franc banned in his own country, the self-important loon :lol: :lol:CommanderTuvok wrote: ↑Ha ha ha. Remember PZ Myers freaking over Frank at a conference?
He also worried about Sacha getting close to his blue-haired boobie and supported the attempt to ban her, too.
That's just retarded.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑6b58cf84
I've seen Matt Cavanaugh comments in threads full of silliness claiming that a penis and a vagina are exactly the same, therefore Matt Cavanaugh obviously shares these beliefs, he must, he posts there.
CaughtUpLockedOut
You will get wildly different opinions from locals depending on perspective. The fact is that the majority of whites still enjoy a far higher standard of living than the majority of blacks. Whites have tended to cede the old city centres to blacks and set up business in the the suburbs where they have managed to insulate themselves from the decay. Although still affected by crime and a range of other issues, the plight of the significant white underclass is largely hidden from them. One gets the feeling that they are living on borrowed time though. Their children are frozen out of the employment market and there is active discrimination against them if they should end up needing state aid. Political opportunists are scapegoating them for the failures of government with rhetoric that could end in bloodshed. I tend to believe that there is a high incidence of racially motivated violence against whites, but it is difficult to get a handle on the truth because the government is doing a good job of hiding it. You will have a hard time getting anyone other than fringe conservatives to care because in most contexts wealth equates to power. In SA though, whites are politically powerless and their remaining, albeit dwindling, wealth makes them a target of envy and hatred.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Tue Mar 06, 2018 4:35 pmWhat is alarming is the lack of international concern over the treatment of whites in South Africa. If this was happening to any other ethnic group, there would be widespread condemnation and U.N. meetings. Instead there is mostly radio silence.
While I'm on the subject, if anybody has some good sources on the SA situation, especially the more horrific aspects, I would be grateful if you'd post or PM them to me. I'm going to harangue my local public radio station about their lack of coverage, seeing as they're asking for my money.
Shatterface wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:12 pmThat's just retarded.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑6b58cf84
Matt wades into that shit precisely to pick apart their arguments. If you think Corbyn was posting in an antisemitic Facebook group to counter their arguments - or even to troll the forum - give us some examples of where he did this.
According to David Collier, there's no evidence that Corbyn et al were there to guide people away from their antisemitic ways.Shatterface wrote: ↑That's just retarded.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑6b58cf84
Matt wades into that shit precisely to pick apart their arguments. If you think Corbyn was posting in an antisemitic Facebook group to counter their arguments - or even to troll the forum - give us some examples of where he did this.
evocative of a daisy chain
I hear it is a cesspool of bigfoot believers, holocaust deniers, n word lovers, and kooks that not only don't think transwomen are women, but women aren't women unless they are barefoot and pregnant. :ugeek:The Slymepit (according to the Kiwis) is a far right forum because that "creativity" twat posted here for a couple of days.
They're doing it wrong.mordacious1 wrote: ↑ When I did this in 4th Grade, I got in trouble:
http://www.businessinsider.com/mcdonald ... own-2018-3
Talking of Kiwisfree thoughtpolice wrote: ↑I hear it is a cesspool of bigfoot believers, holocaust deniers, n word lovers, and kooks that not only don't think transwomen are women, but women aren't women unless they are barefoot and pregnant. :ugeek:The Slymepit (according to the Kiwis) is a far right forum because that "creativity" twat posted here for a couple of days.
It's an antisemitic Facebook group, not a Facebook group on which a few idiots posted antisemitic messages. If Vicky had spouted her Holocaust denying shit here with approval or if she'd simply been ignored instead of having her bullshit refuted point by point there might be a fucking parallel.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑Shatterface wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:12 pmThat's just retarded.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑6b58cf84
Matt wades into that shit precisely to pick apart their arguments. If you think Corbyn was posting in an antisemitic Facebook group to counter their arguments - or even to troll the forum - give us some examples of where he did this.
Yes, and Jeremy Corbyn in the post at Guido was replying to a woman who was praising the speakers at the event in question, a woman whose comment had nothing to do with joo hating. The Guido post seems to be putting forward the idea that by posting anything at all in those comments he was approving of comments surrounding his own. I used the Matt example precisely because it would be absurd to say that he is in agreement with or approves of other comments just because he posts there. I said nothing about his intent in being there. But to turn it around on you, if you think Jeremy corbyn was in that group and appriving of anti semitism in it, show me the posts where he makes or approves of anti semitic remarks.
The Slymepit (according to the Kiwis) is a far right forum because that "creativity" twat posted here for a couple of days.
CaughtUpLockedOut.
You're not getting it. It's not that people are saying that Jeremy Corbyn is explicitly endorsing antisemitism. It's just that he doesn't seem all that bothered by it.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑ But to turn it around on you, if you think Jeremy corbyn was in that group and appriving of anti semitism in it, show me the posts where he makes or approves of anti semitic remarks.
I'm surprised to see Duncan Jones whiff a second movie in a row. His Mute currently has a paltry 12% on Rotten Tomatoes :shock:katamari Damassi wrote: ↑ Multi-culti, black female directed A Wrinkle in Time currently rated rotten on Rotten Tomatoes. Not sure what to make of this. It's a movie I would've seen, but wasn't planning to because I can't stand Mindy Kahling.
In both the cases you cite, people were actively refuting the bullshit, not casually posting. Matt was putting up with a lot to argue against the status quo and Creativity got her ass handed to her and ran away. Not the same as posting along merrily, ignoring the bullshit.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑Shatterface wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:12 pmThat's just retarded.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑6b58cf84
Matt wades into that shit precisely to pick apart their arguments. If you think Corbyn was posting in an antisemitic Facebook group to counter their arguments - or even to troll the forum - give us some examples of where he did this.
Yes, and Jeremy Corbyn in the post at Guido was replying to a woman who was praising the speakers at the event in question, a woman whose comment had nothing to do with joo hating. The Guido post seems to be putting forward the idea that by posting anything at all in those comments he was approving of comments surrounding his own. I used the Matt example precisely because it would be absurd to say that he is in agreement with or approves of other comments just because he posts there. I said nothing about his intent in being there. But to turn it around on you, if you think Jeremy corbyn was in that group and appriving of anti semitism in it, show me the posts where he makes or approves of anti semitic remarks.
The Slymepit (according to the Kiwis) is a far right forum because that "creativity" twat posted here for a couple of days.
CaughtUpLockedOut.
In both the cases you cite, people were actively refuting the bullshit, not casually posting. Matt was putting up with a lot to argue against the status quo and Creativity got her ass handed to her and ran away. Not the same as posting along merrily, ignoring the bullshit.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑Shatterface wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:12 pmThat's just retarded.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑6b58cf84
Matt wades into that shit precisely to pick apart their arguments. If you think Corbyn was posting in an antisemitic Facebook group to counter their arguments - or even to troll the forum - give us some examples of where he did this.
Yes, and Jeremy Corbyn in the post at Guido was replying to a woman who was praising the speakers at the event in question, a woman whose comment had nothing to do with joo hating. The Guido post seems to be putting forward the idea that by posting anything at all in those comments he was approving of comments surrounding his own. I used the Matt example precisely because it would be absurd to say that he is in agreement with or approves of other comments just because he posts there. I said nothing about his intent in being there. But to turn it around on you, if you think Jeremy corbyn was in that group and appriving of anti semitism in it, show me the posts where he makes or approves of anti semitic remarks.
The Slymepit (according to the Kiwis) is a far right forum because that "creativity" twat posted here for a couple of days.
CaughtUpLockedOut.
In both the cases you cite, people were actively refuting the bullshit, not casually posting. Matt was putting up with a lot to argue against the status quo and Creativity got her ass handed to her and ran away. Not the same as posting along merrily, ignoring the bullshit.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑Shatterface wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:12 pmThat's just retarded.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑6b58cf84
Matt wades into that shit precisely to pick apart their arguments. If you think Corbyn was posting in an antisemitic Facebook group to counter their arguments - or even to troll the forum - give us some examples of where he did this.
Yes, and Jeremy Corbyn in the post at Guido was replying to a woman who was praising the speakers at the event in question, a woman whose comment had nothing to do with joo hating. The Guido post seems to be putting forward the idea that by posting anything at all in those comments he was approving of comments surrounding his own. I used the Matt example precisely because it would be absurd to say that he is in agreement with or approves of other comments just because he posts there. I said nothing about his intent in being there. But to turn it around on you, if you think Jeremy corbyn was in that group and appriving of anti semitism in it, show me the posts where he makes or approves of anti semitic remarks.
The Slymepit (according to the Kiwis) is a far right forum because that "creativity" twat posted here for a couple of days.
CaughtUpLockedOut.
I haven't seen it yet, and I liked the trailers so much I reread the book.katamari Damassi wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 1:01 pmMulti-culti, black female directed A Wrinkle in Time currently rated rotten on Rotten Tomatoes. Not sure what to make of this. It's a movie I would've seen, but wasn't planning to because I can't stand Mindy Kahling.
ie, PROBLEMATICALWas A Wrinkle in Time the right source material through which to tell this story?
The Labour Party will only take action if Labour party members posted anti-Semitic material on that secret group. If they stood idly by while Holocaust deniers and white supremacists filled their newsfeed unchallenged with anti-Semitism, that is fineShatterface wrote: ↑It's an antisemitic Facebook group, not a Facebook group on which a few idiots posted antisemitic messages. If Vicky had spouted her Holocaust denying shit here with approval or if she'd simply been ignored instead of having her bullshit refuted point by point there might be a fucking parallel.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑Shatterface wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:12 pmThat's just retarded.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑6b58cf84
Matt wades into that shit precisely to pick apart their arguments. If you think Corbyn was posting in an antisemitic Facebook group to counter their arguments - or even to troll the forum - give us some examples of where he did this.
Yes, and Jeremy Corbyn in the post at Guido was replying to a woman who was praising the speakers at the event in question, a woman whose comment had nothing to do with joo hating. The Guido post seems to be putting forward the idea that by posting anything at all in those comments he was approving of comments surrounding his own. I used the Matt example precisely because it would be absurd to say that he is in agreement with or approves of other comments just because he posts there. I said nothing about his intent in being there. But to turn it around on you, if you think Jeremy corbyn was in that group and appriving of anti semitism in it, show me the posts where he makes or approves of anti semitic remarks.
The Slymepit (according to the Kiwis) is a far right forum because that "creativity" twat posted here for a couple of days.
CaughtUpLockedOut.
Also, Corbyn wants to run the fucking country. He has teams of advisors. He has shown himself to be as competent as Trump.
Jeremy Corbyn was part of a secret Facebook group where Holocaust denialism went unchallenged.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑Shatterface wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:12 pmThat's just retarded.Guest_6b58cf84 wrote: ↑6b58cf84
Matt wades into that shit precisely to pick apart their arguments. If you think Corbyn was posting in an antisemitic Facebook group to counter their arguments - or even to troll the forum - give us some examples of where he did this.
Yes, and Jeremy Corbyn in the post at Guido was replying to a woman who was praising the speakers at the event in question, a woman whose comment had nothing to do with joo hating. The Guido post seems to be putting forward the idea that by posting anything at all in those comments he was approving of comments surrounding his own. I used the Matt example precisely because it would be absurd to say that he is in agreement with or approves of other comments just because he posts there. I said nothing about his intent in being there. But to turn it around on you, if you think Jeremy corbyn was in that group and appriving of anti semitism in it, show me the posts where he makes or approves of anti semitic remarks.
The Slymepit (according to the Kiwis) is a far right forum because that "creativity" twat posted here for a couple of days.
CaughtUpLockedOut.
I have posted a link of Krauss' denial of the Buzzfeed article to the blogpost Matthew Facciani had about the matter. I would like to do the same to articles that PZ Myers, Mano singham, Ed Brayton, and others have written about the Buzzfeed piece however my peaches have been frozen. I would encourage others to do so, and see if they keep up the smear campaign and praise of Buzzfeed's awesome journalism standards.
I believe it is possible to be added to a closed FB group if one of your FB friends is a member of that group and they decide to add you to it, and if you do indeed get over a hundred notifications a day, then it is very possible to miss it.SM1957 wrote: ↑ 'Chris Williamson MP told Jewish News: “I get well over a hundred notifications from social media every single day. I was not aware that I was added to this group nor have I participated in it. Upon being informed that I was a member I have left the group. Facebook should change its settings to enable users to accept or decline membership of groups.”'
Is this possible? Can you be added to Far Right Neo-Nazi groups without knowing about it?
Won't do much good. Accusations of sexual misdeeds against men are like conspiracy theories- people that initially believe it are unlikely to change their mind, even if the evidence turns against it.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑I have posted a link of Krauss' denial of the Buzzfeed article to the blogpost Matthew Facciani had about the matter. I would like to do the same to articles that PZ Myers, Mano singham, Ed Brayton, and others have written about the Buzzfeed piece however my peaches have been frozen. I would encourage others to do so, and see if they keep up the smear campaign and praise of Buzzfeed's awesome journalism standards.
Well, it's he said/she said at the moment. Dunno who to believe. However, that Krauss is still alive and without damage to his ribcage shouldn't be taken as evidence that Hensley didn't actually pin him to the bed; I believe the alleged incident occurred back in the days when she was thin.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ It is almost as though Hensley climbed on the #MeToo train for attention. If Krauss got crushed beneath the accusations, it was merely as playful as being crushed by her bulk.
The lesson being, don't just not stick your dick in crazy, keep a wide berth from crazy.
I see two women in orange burkas, holding hands.
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ It is almost as though Hensley climbed on the #MeToo train [INSERT ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING HERE] for attention.
Off course she went on a dinner date with him. She's not turning down a free meal.Tigzy wrote: ↑ :o
https://i.imgur.com/nnAZgNs.png
Christ. It's a wonder she didn't lay an egg in him.
You're mistaken. It's Zinnia Jones who will insert absolutely anything for attention.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ It is almost as though Hensley climbed on the #MeToo train [INSERT ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING HERE] for attention.
No. Nope. No way.Tigzy wrote: ↑Well, it's he said/she said at the moment. Dunno who to believe. However, that Krauss is still alive and without damage to his ribcage shouldn't be taken as evidence that Hensley didn't actually pin him to the bed; I believe the alleged incident occurred back in the days when she was thin.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ It is almost as though Hensley climbed on the #MeToo train for attention. If Krauss got crushed beneath the accusations, it was merely as playful as being crushed by her bulk.
The lesson being, don't just not stick your dick in crazy, keep a wide berth from crazy.
Sounds familiar... I had long hair in the sixties as well, and it did not go over well at all in rural Oklahoma where I grew up. For me replace "misgendered" with calls of "you fucking hippie" or similar and replace "mispronounced" with some nasty something about traitors and Vietnam.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:21 amI had long hair in the Sixties. I got 'misgendered' and 'mispronouned' all the time, and maliciously so. I did not collapse into a helpless, quivering ball or throw an infantile temper tantrum.Kirbmarc wrote: ↑Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ ... in which I'm told to stop hurting people's feelings by questioning the radical trans narrative.
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/frie ... 3791652248"I do not entirely understand why people might be religious, but my biggest fear in working with religious people is that I will hurt their feelings by criticizing religion. That's really about it".skinnercitycyclist wrote:I do not entirely understand transgenderism, but my biggest fear in working with my transgender students is that I will hurt their feelings by using the wrong pronoun. That's really about it.
"I do not entirely understand why people believe in astrology, but my biggest fear in working with people who believe in astrology is that I will hurt their feelings by saying that astrology is bunk. That's really about it".
"I do not entirely understand why people might vote for Donald Trump, but my biggest fear in working with Trump fans is that I will hurt their feelings by saying that Trump is a piece of shit, and that they've been swindled. That's really about it".
Just had a quick read through, there doesn't appear to be any mention of Watson's claim of him groping her at a bar. The closest I can gather is the Center for Inquiry Cruise response but he doesn't name the accuser.
I had long hair and a beard, also am big guy that was reasonably swoll and occasionally got some goof say "Are you a girl or a boy hee hee'.Sounds familiar... I had long hair in the sixties as well, and it did not go over well at all in rural Oklahoma where I grew up. For me replace "misgendered" with calls of "you fucking hippie" or similar and replace "mispronounced" with some nasty something about traitors and Vietnam.
As I aged, my responses progressed from wailing "I'm a boy!!" to simply starting a fight, to "your sister knows for sure I'm a boy", which usually also led to a fight.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ BoxNDox wrote:I had long hair and a beard, also am big guy that was reasonably swoll and occasionally got some goof say "Are you a girl or a boy hee hee'.Sounds familiar... I had long hair in the sixties as well, and it did not go over well at all in rural Oklahoma where I grew up. For me replace "misgendered" with calls of "you fucking hippie" or similar and replace "mispronounced" with some nasty something about traitors and Vietnam.
My usual response was something like "wow I seldom meet people that are so stupid they can't tell the difference between a man and a woman".
