Fuck off, Jamie!
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
That wouldn’t surprise me. The left should change their narrative accordingly. It’s less clear cut than the 1960s but more accurate.
The idea that overarching Southern identity ended in 1865 is of course a bit simplistic. Unlike Nazism which drew on themes but found clear manifestation only over a 10 year period.
Maybe the Lee statues would be welcome in the Libyan slave markets of today? Waste not, want not.
The idea that overarching Southern identity ended in 1865 is of course a bit simplistic. Unlike Nazism which drew on themes but found clear manifestation only over a 10 year period.
Maybe the Lee statues would be welcome in the Libyan slave markets of today? Waste not, want not.
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Did somebody else flounce? And what the fuck is a dummy spit?KiwiInOz wrote: ↑Sat Jul 07, 2018 5:39 pmhttp://i63.tinypic.com/21euwt0.jpg
Fuck me, but there is some dummy spitting going on from peeps who I thought had a bit more resilience. I have a disappoint.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
http://i.imgur.com/ghy0iih.jpgCaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Did somebody else flounce? And what the fuck is a dummy spit?KiwiInOz wrote: ↑Sat Jul 07, 2018 5:39 pmhttp://i63.tinypic.com/21euwt0.jpg
Fuck me, but there is some dummy spitting going on from peeps who I thought had a bit more resilience. I have a disappoint.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Even though Brive's post is worth a thousand, words are sometimes still needed.
Spit the Dummy
cf: Throwing your toys out of the pram.
(I suppose I'll have to explain what is a parambulator is now...)
Spit the Dummy
cf: Throwing your toys out of the pram.
(I suppose I'll have to explain what is a parambulator is now...)
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
More horror revealed in the Australian Senate.
When Liberal senator Jane Hume and Liberal Democrat David Leyonhjelm pass each other around Parliament, he tends to greet her with the phrase: "G'day, hot chick."
She typically replies: "G'day, handsome."
For Hume, a first-term senator from Victoria with a long history of advancing the cause for women in the Liberal Party, this interaction is "totally harmless". Better than that, she says, "it's fun and it makes life colourful".
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
An aboriginal historian has discovered that native Australia was more akin to Wakanda.
https://www.news.com.au/technology/envi ... 0c19bb8281
Amazing stuff.They describe densely-populated Aboriginal villages up and down the country, some with sophisticated buildings.
https://www.news.com.au/technology/envi ... 0c19bb8281
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Suffer the children to come unto me.Mr Pascoe said there was a bit of backlash against his ideas from certain historians when he first started writing about his theories in 2013, but since then, he said the majority of people he has spoken to, especially young people, have been enthusiastic about his arguments.
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Do you really confuse tedium, boredom and repetitive posting with hurt feelings? How astoundingly arrogant.Brive1987 wrote: ↑http://i.imgur.com/ghy0iih.jpgCaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Did somebody else flounce? And what the fuck is a dummy spit?KiwiInOz wrote: ↑Sat Jul 07, 2018 5:39 pmhttp://i63.tinypic.com/21euwt0.jpg
Fuck me, but there is some dummy spitting going on from peeps who I thought had a bit more resilience. I have a disappoint.
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Nobody's feelings are hurt. Who really cares all that much? It's boredom. Ask PigInTheCity, Matt, Sunder and so many others. Really. It's the boredom that comes with your predictable and repetitive posts and your astounding arrogance.
You are essentially doing a Mykeru with his shit GIFs and then wondering why people are sick of it.
You are essentially doing a Mykeru with his shit GIFs and then wondering why people are sick of it.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
WTF are you talking about?
I’m giving you the definition for “dummy spit” you asked for.
A simple “thank you” and a wave would suffice. :hand: Now you’re up for an apology as well. But don’t bother.
I’m giving you the definition for “dummy spit” you asked for.
A simple “thank you” and a wave would suffice. :hand: Now you’re up for an apology as well. But don’t bother.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
So this is where they've sent poor old Tommy then?
http://www.justice.gov.uk/__data/assets ... /onley.jpg
https://www.justice.gov.uk/contacts/prison-finder/onley
Fucken medieval, innit?
A category C prison, formerly a borstal (i.e. for holding kids), notable only for someone who once bit the head off a pigeon.
Probably swarming with jihadis who want to steal his blanky.
http://www.justice.gov.uk/__data/assets ... /onley.jpg
https://www.justice.gov.uk/contacts/prison-finder/onley
Fucken medieval, innit?
A category C prison, formerly a borstal (i.e. for holding kids), notable only for someone who once bit the head off a pigeon.
Probably swarming with jihadis who want to steal his blanky.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
http://i.imgur.com/QrPHHc1.jpgShatterface wrote: ↑ So this is where they've sent poor old Tommy then?
http://www.justice.gov.uk/__data/assets ... /onley.jpg
https://www.justice.gov.uk/contacts/prison-finder/onley
Fucken medieval, innit?
A category C prison, formerly a borstal (i.e. for holding kids), notable only for someone who once bit the head off a pigeon.
Probably swarming with jihadis who want to steal his blanky.
Two star on TripAdvisor.
There should be a prize for someone asking what a dummy spit is, being told and then .... having a dummy spit as a consequence.
:lol: :lol:
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
The only difference between a Category C prison and a Travelodge is Travelodge has a higher suicide rate.
If we were talking about anyone less of a pussy than Robinson people would be complaining about how soft British prisons are.
If we were talking about anyone less of a pussy than Robinson people would be complaining about how soft British prisons are.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
It was a roll up post that segued abruptly to the Captain.Shatterface wrote: ↑Who are you even replying to here? Even the voices in your head must be bored with you by now.
The TR case for me has always been about the optics of the State imprisoning someone for giving a shit about “grooming” while they ignored the problem themselves for decades out of PC considerations. I’m sure the letter of the law (crap as it may be) was followed etc.
I don’t think even the govt is dumb or clever enough to orchestrate an extra-judicial killing. I’m sure they were, in principle, glad he is was out of the way though, just like they were keen to disappear Brittany and Southern from the UK scene.
So the nature of the jail is fairly immaterial. Other people will have their own ideas.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I can think of at least three of you who seems to hang around on tenterhooks waiting for Brive's every utterance.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1496009/t ... in-prison/#Twisted lag bites head off pigeon in exchange for drugs in sick stunt filmed illegally in prison
https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/upl ... .jpg?w=960
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I tried, unsuccessfully, to open the conversation up to US Govt weirdness - which is exotic to say the least. And I don’t do Peterson.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Because the pit used to be a good place, an antidote to the soft racism of SocJus, a place to compare notes and relieve stress. Now it is Brive's pet sounding board.
I raise shit that appears interesting because there are usually implicit questions or tensions in the piece. Usually I raise these without much of a lecture. More a cocked eyebrow. And not always on a fixed theme - outside SJW/wet-Liberal Pomo across multiple areas. That’s been my mode forever. Recently SJWism, euro shit, trump politics and national identity have found intersection.
Ie the SJW battlefield has extended outside the heat death of Scepticism. And the failure of centre liberals to engage, and the leaving of the debate to alt right wack-a-loons and alt liters is frustrating to say the least.
Ok, yes. I wrestle with Kirb’s BS or other direct engagement coming my way. There is that ..........
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Sometimes your responses come accross like a Julia Childs cooking show.
To whit: "Here's one I prepared earlier".
(Not that I would set myself up as an example of a model poster)
To whit: "Here's one I prepared earlier".
(Not that I would set myself up as an example of a model poster)
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Take a look at the posters complaining about the hijack. Then tell me I'm full of shit. Go back a ways.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Ahh - but that is not the way the FT sees things.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ Take a look at the posters complaining about the hijack. Then tell me I'm full of shit. Go back a ways.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I suppose it's because I don't see it as a hijack so much as I see the dismantling of borders as the next logical step in SJW progress, the step where they apparently gain the support of several pitsters.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ Take a look at the posters complaining about the hijack. Then tell me I'm full of shit. Go back a ways.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
It's possible to be for open borders without being an SJW - it's a standard libertarian issue after all.fuzzy wrote: ↑I suppose it's because I don't see it as a hijack so much as I see the dismantling of borders as the next logical step in SJW progress, the step where they apparently gain the support of several pitsters.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ Take a look at the posters complaining about the hijack. Then tell me I'm full of shit. Go back a ways.
For a more conceptual type of border, the line between the Alt-Lite and the Alt-Right is semi-permiable at best, and non-existant at worst (or vice versa if you have a different take on this subject). At times it seems like it's really an optics issue - people are stating what they believe will apeal to the masses (or at least to more moderate members of their audience) - rather than take a principled stance.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Your segue is very naughty Marcus. :naughty:
But given you brought it up.
No. The hard alt-right is firmly, overtly and unabashedly racist in how they perceive the western collective.
The alt-lite is more nuanced and ranges from Sargon’s crushing of the left to facilitate his national-liberalism to culture warriors like Southern and Goldy. These groups will define the West in terms of heritage and place - they will acknowledge that geographical based identity has a racial facet but don’t see it in the magik conspiracy minded lens of the rights. Hence the alt-right hate the lites as race traitors.
The alt lite span the majority of social conservatives and shouldn’t be defined by the nut-job wing.
But given you brought it up.
No. The hard alt-right is firmly, overtly and unabashedly racist in how they perceive the western collective.
The alt-lite is more nuanced and ranges from Sargon’s crushing of the left to facilitate his national-liberalism to culture warriors like Southern and Goldy. These groups will define the West in terms of heritage and place - they will acknowledge that geographical based identity has a racial facet but don’t see it in the magik conspiracy minded lens of the rights. Hence the alt-right hate the lites as race traitors.
The alt lite span the majority of social conservatives and shouldn’t be defined by the nut-job wing.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Right and left have become such meaningless political terms - grab bags for othering. Do you support the King's hereditary rights, or do you support the right of Parliament to deny the heir apparent his Kingship?
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
It's as simple as that.
Alt Right are probably just Papist outlaws and Ctrl Left are bloody Scottish Presbyterians.
Alt Right are probably just Papist outlaws and Ctrl Left are bloody Scottish Presbyterians.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
It's an interesting topic and I don't have all the answers - so I don't have the boundaries set in place to know whether I'm transgressing (or being naughty) or not. And even if you tell me where I am wrong I may still have to ponder to decide where I stand.Brive1987 wrote: ↑ Your segue is very naughty Marcus. :naughty:
But given you brought it up.
No. The hard alt-right is firmly, overtly and unabashedly racist in how they perceive the western collective.
The alt-lite is more nuanced and ranges from Sargon’s crushing of the left to facilitate his national-liberalism to culture warriors like Southern and Goldy. These groups will define the West in terms of heritage and place - they will acknowledge that geographical based identity has a racial facet but don’t see it in the magik conspiracy minded lens of the rights. Hence the alt-right hate the lites as race traitors.
The alt lite span the majority of social conservatives and shouldn’t be defined by the nut-job wing.
That said - and I believe I have brought it up before - what is 'hard' about the Alt-Right? I've heard Richard Spencer described as a socialist after all. (At least for the 'white' sort of people). About the only thing they agree upon is 'Race Realism' and more than a few in the Alt-Lite would concur with them on that.
I'm not sure I see the same degree of hate between the two groups that you do. Southern and Goldy have the admiration of Jared Taylor and Peter Brimelow after all (I can try and find a YouTube link if you are interested - but I'm assuming you are not). Which is why I was stating that this is an optics or a strategic rather than a philosophical difference between the groups. But as you you intimated in your review of Southern's book - she may not be the deepest of thinkers. It remains to be seen if either she or Goldy will become leaders in any sense.
As to Sargon and his Liberalist collective - well it has been said: They are not as smart as they think they are. The 'Join UKIP' stunt being a recent example of 'shit poster' rather than 'pragmatic political' thinking predominating.
On second thoughts though - perhaps this should be shunted off to the ethnostate thread. (Which most people do NOT have a problem in naming - contrary to your assertion/joke).
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Ive put a reply in Voldermort. Enough wails, lamentation and gnashing of teeth by our peers for one day. :mrgreen:
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I'm note sure when (if ever) I'll understand English culture...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG5kJiniTmg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG5kJiniTmg
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I suppose this has some relevance here? Political Moderates Are Lying
Just so you know it may be a longish read (if you do the comments as well). Here is a j.random.quote ... and BTW it is about US politics but I suspect some of it applies elsewhere:
And this is why you should not leave the 'Pit (cause misery loves company?) not that it really matters because any three 'Pitters will/might/can have five contradictory and mutually exclusive opinions.
Just so you know it may be a longish read (if you do the comments as well). Here is a j.random.quote ... and BTW it is about US politics but I suspect some of it applies elsewhere:
Hmmm... going to back up a bit .... lemme see ..Characterized as racists and “deplorables,” Trump supporters felt hesitant to declare their voting preferences when polled. Publicly admitting one’s support for Trump would garner disapproval. Pollsters could not breach this veil of false reportage.
Bah!. OK a lil more backing up to explain the above?For a viewpoint to become popular, a minimum number of group members must first adopt it. Once this threshold is reached, the viewpoint becomes self-sustaining with more and more adopting it. Thus, the preferences of an intransigent minority are mainstreamed once enough moderates adopt them.
Look shitlords ... click on the link and read it all. Also the comments.The tipping point is 10%. “When the number of committed opinion holders is below 10%, there is no visible progress in the spread of ideas…once that number grows above 10 %, the idea spreads like a flame.”
And this is why you should not leave the 'Pit (cause misery loves company?) not that it really matters because any three 'Pitters will/might/can have five contradictory and mutually exclusive opinions.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I have already forgotten what a dummy spit is. True story.Shatterface wrote: ↑Sat Jul 07, 2018 9:46 pmWho are you even replying to here? Even the voices in your head must be bored with you by now.
*sigh*
I just looked it up. OK. Never mind.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
The first 4 of those Thai soccer kids trapped in a cave have been rescued. After a couple of weeks of waiting, it was really looking like it wasn't going to happen. What a relief, I hope they get them all.
https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/thai ... index.html
https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/thai ... index.html
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
*clicks metaphorical like button*Ape+lust wrote: ↑ The first 4 of those Thai soccer kids trapped in a cave have been rescued. After a couple of weeks of waiting, it was really looking like it wasn't going to happen. What a relief, I hope they get them all.
https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/thai ... index.html
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I used open borders as a shorthand for a number of related issues. On most of those issues I see as contentious here on the Pyt, I suggest those of you seeking agreement and uniformity on those issues will find what you desire on a blog called Pharyngula.MarcusAu wrote: ↑It's possible to be for open borders without being an SJW - it's a standard libertarian issue after all.fuzzy wrote: ↑I suppose it's because I don't see it as a hijack so much as I see the dismantling of borders as the next logical step in SJW progress, the step where they apparently gain the support of several pitsters.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ Take a look at the posters complaining about the hijack. Then tell me I'm full of shit. Go back a ways.
For a more conceptual type of border, the line between the Alt-Lite and the Alt-Right is semi-permiable at best, and non-existant at worst (or vice versa if you have a different take on this subject). At times it seems like it's really an optics issue - people are stating what they believe will apeal to the masses (or at least to more moderate members of their audience) - rather than take a principled stance.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Your people are waiting. Tell them how the current Nazi plague is due to toxic wbiteness and watch Peeze come in his pants for you.
-
- .
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Steady on now...CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Because the pit used to be a good place
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Good news! Hillary seems to be gearing up for 2020.
https://nypost.com/2018/07/07/is-hillar ... n-in-2020/
https://nypost.com/2018/07/07/is-hillar ... n-in-2020/
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I hear you go Nazi Nazi Nazi with great regularity. Nazi.
-
- .
- Posts: 6555
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Well first there's an interview. Please answer the following questions as honestly as possible:
1) You are sitting on a bus in Zurich when you hear a fellow traveler use the word "ethnostate". do you a) ejaculate immediately; b) muse thoughtfully to yourself for a while; or c) get your iphone out, spend 45 minutes depositing the contents of your brain onto a website, and end up missing your intended stop outside Frau Blitzkrieg's "House of Gain" (home of Zurich's best Jewwurst, Himmlerschnitzel, and Annefrankenfurters)?
2) Should Sydney be renamed SSydney?
3) Muslims: a) more please, Mrs Merkel, or b) can we not make them go and live in the desert with the Abo's? At least keep them out of the North shore, please.
-
- .
- Posts: 6555
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
As I documented a while ago, Greg Laden's FTB account has his details stored from some previous attempt at sockpuppeting or impersonation.
The fucking moron can't work out how to clear the username, so he has to keep explaining himself every time he comments.
Long may he continue being such a legendary fuckup.
https://i.imgur.com/r8NfsBV.png
https://i.imgur.com/8X2gpNV.jpg
The fucking moron can't work out how to clear the username, so he has to keep explaining himself every time he comments.
Long may he continue being such a legendary fuckup.
https://i.imgur.com/r8NfsBV.png
https://i.imgur.com/8X2gpNV.jpg
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I can make a list, if you insist.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
:lol: :lol: :lol:ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑ As I documented a while ago, Greg Laden's FTB account has his details stored from some previous attempt at sockpuppeting or impersonation.
The fucking moron can't work out how to clear the username, so he has to keep explaining himself every time he comments.
Long may he continue being such a legendary fuckup.
https://i.imgur.com/r8NfsBV.png
https://i.imgur.com/8X2gpNV.jpg
LADEN, COME BAAAAAAACK!!
(This is a Slymepitter, not an APlusser.)
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
At last someone is taking ecology seriously:
https://reason.com/blog/2018/07/05/al-q ... st-group-bAl Qaeda-Linked Somali Terrorist Group Bans Plastic Bags
Al-Shabab has declared plastic bags a "a serious threat to the well-being of humans and animals alike."
Somalia's so-called libertarian moment is over, now that Al Shabab—the Al Qaeda-linked Islamist terrorist organization that controls swaths of territory in the southern reaches of the anarchic, East African nation—has declared a prohibition on plastic bags.
News of the ban was first published on the reportedly Shabab-controlled site Somalimemo.net, which aired an audio recording of a Shabab official declaring the bags "a serious threat to the well-being of humans and animals alike."
The New York Times reports that Shabab-linked twitter accounts and radio stations later broadcast news of the ban.
Press reports did not include details of Shabab's enforcement strategy, but if its past behavior is any guide, penalties will be severe. The group already enforces prohibitions on music, movie theaters, and satellite TV, and is known for carrying out public executions of political rivals and homosexuals.
Other East African governments have also taken severe measures to crackdown on plastic bags. Since 2017, the government of Kenya—which is locked in a vicious war with Al-Shabab—has penalized mere possession of plastic bags with up to four years in prison or fines of $40,000.
Rwanda has banned plastic bags since 2008, earning it praise from environmental groups as "Africa's cleanest nation" while its police beat, humiliate, and imprison bag smugglers caught crossing into the country.
It is certainly true that in poorer countries without well-developed waste management systems, plastic pollution poses a significant problem. Loose bags and debris block waterways, pile up in neighborhoods, and wind up in the stomachs of livestock. Most of the plastic getting into the world's oceans comes from poor, populous coastal countries whose litter goes mostly uncollected.
Yet, judging by the thriving black markets for bags that have developed in Rwanda and other nations with bag bans, plenty of people still consider them necessities.
So while East Africa's crop of authoritarian regimes and terrorist organizations are not wrong to worry about plastic's effect on the environment, a more humane solution might be finding ways to improve its waste collection efforts, not hitting the world's poorest people with fines and—often—much worse penalties.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
What on earth could account for all those civil war statues being erected fifty years after the civil war? Must have been a response to the NAACP.Brive1987 wrote: ↑ Feelz. Fucking feelz everywhere. If only demographic facts could be applied.
Speaking of data and feelz.
I had heard most confederate monuments went up in the 1960s. And hence should be torn down
An anti right wing YouTuber I listen too. I know. WTF?
Had this graph.
http://i.imgur.com/fJlKRKN.jpg
He tied the monuments to Jim Crow. I don’t know. It seems it could also be the children of the veterans doing something. Stil, interesting divergent data point.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Oh and FFS, the Pit has supposedly been on death's doorstep since I joined it five years ago.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
You will promise to let us know when it's ready for the glue factory though?Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Oh and FFS, the Pit has supposedly been on death's doorstep since I joined it five years ago.
-
- .
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
They're a football team and if you look closely at the initial video clip when they were first found , it looks like one of then is wearing an England shirt.Ape+lust wrote: ↑ The first 4 of those Thai soccer kids trapped in a cave have been rescued. After a couple of weeks of waiting, it was really looking like it wasn't going to happen. What a relief, I hope they get them all.
https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/thai ... index.html
(Red with the the 3 lions badge)
"What, You still don't know England are in the semi finals, are you living in a cave or summat?"
=