Fuck off, Jamie!

Old subthreads
Locked
Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#781

Post by Brive1987 »

That wouldn’t surprise me. The left should change their narrative accordingly. It’s less clear cut than the 1960s but more accurate.

The idea that overarching Southern identity ended in 1865 is of course a bit simplistic. Unlike Nazism which drew on themes but found clear manifestation only over a 10 year period.

Maybe the Lee statues would be welcome in the Libyan slave markets of today? Waste not, want not.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#782

Post by free thoughtpolice »


CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#783

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

KiwiInOz wrote:
Sat Jul 07, 2018 5:39 pm
http://i63.tinypic.com/21euwt0.jpg

Fuck me, but there is some dummy spitting going on from peeps who I thought had a bit more resilience. I have a disappoint.
Did somebody else flounce? And what the fuck is a dummy spit?

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#784

Post by Brive1987 »


Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#785

Post by Brive1987 »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
KiwiInOz wrote:
Sat Jul 07, 2018 5:39 pm
http://i63.tinypic.com/21euwt0.jpg

Fuck me, but there is some dummy spitting going on from peeps who I thought had a bit more resilience. I have a disappoint.
Did somebody else flounce? And what the fuck is a dummy spit?
http://i.imgur.com/ghy0iih.jpg

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#786

Post by MarcusAu »

Even though Brive's post is worth a thousand, words are sometimes still needed.

Spit the Dummy

cf: Throwing your toys out of the pram.

(I suppose I'll have to explain what is a parambulator is now...)

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#787

Post by Brive1987 »

More horror revealed in the Australian Senate.
When Liberal senator Jane Hume and Liberal Democrat David Leyonhjelm pass each other around Parliament, he tends to greet her with the phrase: "G'day, hot chick."

She typically replies: "G'day, handsome."

For Hume, a first-term senator from Victoria with a long history of advancing the cause for women in the Liberal Party, this interaction is "totally harmless". Better than that, she says, "it's fun and it makes life colourful".

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#788

Post by Brive1987 »

An aboriginal historian has discovered that native Australia was more akin to Wakanda.
They describe densely-populated Aboriginal villages up and down the country, some with sophisticated buildings.
Amazing stuff.

https://www.news.com.au/technology/envi ... 0c19bb8281

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#789

Post by Brive1987 »

Mr Pascoe said there was a bit of backlash against his ideas from certain historians when he first started writing about his theories in 2013, but since then, he said the majority of people he has spoken to, especially young people, have been enthusiastic about his arguments.
Suffer the children to come unto me.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#790

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Brive1987 wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
KiwiInOz wrote:
Sat Jul 07, 2018 5:39 pm
http://i63.tinypic.com/21euwt0.jpg

Fuck me, but there is some dummy spitting going on from peeps who I thought had a bit more resilience. I have a disappoint.
Did somebody else flounce? And what the fuck is a dummy spit?
http://i.imgur.com/ghy0iih.jpg
Do you really confuse tedium, boredom and repetitive posting with hurt feelings? How astoundingly arrogant.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#791

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Nobody's feelings are hurt. Who really cares all that much? It's boredom. Ask PigInTheCity, Matt, Sunder and so many others. Really. It's the boredom that comes with your predictable and repetitive posts and your astounding arrogance.

You are essentially doing a Mykeru with his shit GIFs and then wondering why people are sick of it.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#792

Post by Brive1987 »

WTF are you talking about?

I’m giving you the definition for “dummy spit” you asked for.

A simple “thank you” and a wave would suffice. :hand: Now you’re up for an apology as well. But don’t bother.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#793

Post by Shatterface »

So this is where they've sent poor old Tommy then?

http://www.justice.gov.uk/__data/assets ... /onley.jpg

https://www.justice.gov.uk/contacts/prison-finder/onley

Fucken medieval, innit?

A category C prison, formerly a borstal (i.e. for holding kids), notable only for someone who once bit the head off a pigeon.

Probably swarming with jihadis who want to steal his blanky.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#794

Post by MarcusAu »

Brive1987 wrote: WTF are you talking about?
...
All your other posts.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#795

Post by Shatterface »

Brive1987 wrote: WTF are you talking about?

I’m giving you the definition for “dummy spit” you asked for.

A simple “thank you” and a wave would suffice. :hand: Now you’re up for an apology as well. But don’t bother.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#796

Post by Brive1987 »

MarcusAu wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: WTF are you talking about?
...
All your other posts.
He seemed quite specific.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#797

Post by Brive1987 »

Shatterface wrote: So this is where they've sent poor old Tommy then?

http://www.justice.gov.uk/__data/assets ... /onley.jpg

https://www.justice.gov.uk/contacts/prison-finder/onley

Fucken medieval, innit?

A category C prison, formerly a borstal (i.e. for holding kids), notable only for someone who once bit the head off a pigeon.

Probably swarming with jihadis who want to steal his blanky.
http://i.imgur.com/QrPHHc1.jpg

Two star on TripAdvisor.

There should be a prize for someone asking what a dummy spit is, being told and then .... having a dummy spit as a consequence.

:lol: :lol:

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#798

Post by Shatterface »

The only difference between a Category C prison and a Travelodge is Travelodge has a higher suicide rate.

If we were talking about anyone less of a pussy than Robinson people would be complaining about how soft British prisons are.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#799

Post by Shatterface »

Brive1987 wrote: There should be a prize for someone asking what a dummy spit is, being told and then .... having a dummy spit as a consequence.

:lol: :lol:
Who are you even replying to here? Even the voices in your head must be bored with you by now.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#800

Post by Brive1987 »

Shatterface wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: There should be a prize for someone asking what a dummy spit is, being told and then .... having a dummy spit as a consequence.

:lol: :lol:
Who are you even replying to here? Even the voices in your head must be bored with you by now.
It was a roll up post that segued abruptly to the Captain.

The TR case for me has always been about the optics of the State imprisoning someone for giving a shit about “grooming” while they ignored the problem themselves for decades out of PC considerations. I’m sure the letter of the law (crap as it may be) was followed etc.

I don’t think even the govt is dumb or clever enough to orchestrate an extra-judicial killing. I’m sure they were, in principle, glad he is was out of the way though, just like they were keen to disappear Brittany and Southern from the UK scene.

So the nature of the jail is fairly immaterial. Other people will have their own ideas.

fuzzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#801

Post by fuzzy »

I can think of at least three of you who seems to hang around on tenterhooks waiting for Brive's every utterance.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#802

Post by Shatterface »

Twisted lag bites head off pigeon in exchange for drugs in sick stunt filmed illegally in prison

https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/upl ... .jpg?w=960
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1496009/t ... in-prison/#

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#803

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

fuzzy wrote: I can think of at least three of you who seems to hang around on tenterhooks waiting for Brive's every utterance.
Because the pit used to be a good place, an antidote to the soft racism of SocJus, a place to compare notes and relieve stress. Now it is Brive's pet sounding board.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#804

Post by Brive1987 »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
fuzzy wrote: I can think of at least three of you who seems to hang around on tenterhooks waiting for Brive's every utterance.
Because the pit used to be a good place, an antidote to the soft racism of SocJus, a place to compare notes and relieve stress. Now it is Brive's pet sounding board.
I tried, unsuccessfully, to open the conversation up to US Govt weirdness - which is exotic to say the least. And I don’t do Peterson.

I raise shit that appears interesting because there are usually implicit questions or tensions in the piece. Usually I raise these without much of a lecture. More a cocked eyebrow. And not always on a fixed theme - outside SJW/wet-Liberal Pomo across multiple areas. That’s been my mode forever. Recently SJWism, euro shit, trump politics and national identity have found intersection.

Ie the SJW battlefield has extended outside the heat death of Scepticism. And the failure of centre liberals to engage, and the leaving of the debate to alt right wack-a-loons and alt liters is frustrating to say the least.

Ok, yes. I wrestle with Kirb’s BS or other direct engagement coming my way. There is that ..........

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#805

Post by MarcusAu »

Sometimes your responses come accross like a Julia Childs cooking show.

To whit: "Here's one I prepared earlier".


(Not that I would set myself up as an example of a model poster)

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#806

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Take a look at the posters complaining about the hijack. Then tell me I'm full of shit. Go back a ways.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#807

Post by MarcusAu »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Take a look at the posters complaining about the hijack. Then tell me I'm full of shit. Go back a ways.
Ahh - but that is not the way the FT sees things.

fuzzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#808

Post by fuzzy »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Take a look at the posters complaining about the hijack. Then tell me I'm full of shit. Go back a ways.
I suppose it's because I don't see it as a hijack so much as I see the dismantling of borders as the next logical step in SJW progress, the step where they apparently gain the support of several pitsters.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#809

Post by MarcusAu »

fuzzy wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Take a look at the posters complaining about the hijack. Then tell me I'm full of shit. Go back a ways.
I suppose it's because I don't see it as a hijack so much as I see the dismantling of borders as the next logical step in SJW progress, the step where they apparently gain the support of several pitsters.
It's possible to be for open borders without being an SJW - it's a standard libertarian issue after all.

For a more conceptual type of border, the line between the Alt-Lite and the Alt-Right is semi-permiable at best, and non-existant at worst (or vice versa if you have a different take on this subject). At times it seems like it's really an optics issue - people are stating what they believe will apeal to the masses (or at least to more moderate members of their audience) - rather than take a principled stance.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#810

Post by Brive1987 »

Your segue is very naughty Marcus. :naughty:

But given you brought it up.

No. The hard alt-right is firmly, overtly and unabashedly racist in how they perceive the western collective.

The alt-lite is more nuanced and ranges from Sargon’s crushing of the left to facilitate his national-liberalism to culture warriors like Southern and Goldy. These groups will define the West in terms of heritage and place - they will acknowledge that geographical based identity has a racial facet but don’t see it in the magik conspiracy minded lens of the rights. Hence the alt-right hate the lites as race traitors.

The alt lite span the majority of social conservatives and shouldn’t be defined by the nut-job wing.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#811

Post by KiwiInOz »

Right and left have become such meaningless political terms - grab bags for othering. Do you support the King's hereditary rights, or do you support the right of Parliament to deny the heir apparent his Kingship?

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#812

Post by KiwiInOz »

It's as simple as that.

Alt Right are probably just Papist outlaws and Ctrl Left are bloody Scottish Presbyterians.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#813

Post by MarcusAu »

Brive1987 wrote: Your segue is very naughty Marcus. :naughty:

But given you brought it up.

No. The hard alt-right is firmly, overtly and unabashedly racist in how they perceive the western collective.

The alt-lite is more nuanced and ranges from Sargon’s crushing of the left to facilitate his national-liberalism to culture warriors like Southern and Goldy. These groups will define the West in terms of heritage and place - they will acknowledge that geographical based identity has a racial facet but don’t see it in the magik conspiracy minded lens of the rights. Hence the alt-right hate the lites as race traitors.

The alt lite span the majority of social conservatives and shouldn’t be defined by the nut-job wing.
It's an interesting topic and I don't have all the answers - so I don't have the boundaries set in place to know whether I'm transgressing (or being naughty) or not. And even if you tell me where I am wrong I may still have to ponder to decide where I stand.

That said - and I believe I have brought it up before - what is 'hard' about the Alt-Right? I've heard Richard Spencer described as a socialist after all. (At least for the 'white' sort of people). About the only thing they agree upon is 'Race Realism' and more than a few in the Alt-Lite would concur with them on that.

I'm not sure I see the same degree of hate between the two groups that you do. Southern and Goldy have the admiration of Jared Taylor and Peter Brimelow after all (I can try and find a YouTube link if you are interested - but I'm assuming you are not). Which is why I was stating that this is an optics or a strategic rather than a philosophical difference between the groups. But as you you intimated in your review of Southern's book - she may not be the deepest of thinkers. It remains to be seen if either she or Goldy will become leaders in any sense.

As to Sargon and his Liberalist collective - well it has been said: They are not as smart as they think they are. The 'Join UKIP' stunt being a recent example of 'shit poster' rather than 'pragmatic political' thinking predominating.

On second thoughts though - perhaps this should be shunted off to the ethnostate thread. (Which most people do NOT have a problem in naming - contrary to your assertion/joke).

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#814

Post by Brive1987 »

Ive put a reply in Voldermort. Enough wails, lamentation and gnashing of teeth by our peers for one day. :mrgreen:

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#815

Post by MarcusAu »

Brive1987 wrote: Ive put a reply in Voldermort. Enough wails, lamentation and gnashing of teeth by our peers for one day. :mrgreen:
cheers B.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#816

Post by MarcusAu »

I'm note sure when (if ever) I'll understand English culture...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG5kJiniTmg

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#817

Post by AndrewV69 »

I suppose this has some relevance here? Political Moderates Are Lying

Just so you know it may be a longish read (if you do the comments as well). Here is a j.random.quote ... and BTW it is about US politics but I suspect some of it applies elsewhere:
Characterized as racists and “deplorables,” Trump supporters felt hesitant to declare their voting preferences when polled. Publicly admitting one’s support for Trump would garner disapproval. Pollsters could not breach this veil of false reportage.
Hmmm... going to back up a bit .... lemme see ..
For a viewpoint to become popular, a minimum number of group members must first adopt it. Once this threshold is reached, the viewpoint becomes self-sustaining with more and more adopting it. Thus, the preferences of an intransigent minority are mainstreamed once enough moderates adopt them.
Bah!. OK a lil more backing up to explain the above?
The tipping point is 10%. “When the number of committed opinion holders is below 10%, there is no visible progress in the spread of ideas…once that number grows above 10 %, the idea spreads like a flame.”
Look shitlords ... click on the link and read it all. Also the comments.

And this is why you should not leave the 'Pit (cause misery loves company?) not that it really matters because any three 'Pitters will/might/can have five contradictory and mutually exclusive opinions.

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#818

Post by AndrewV69 »

Shatterface wrote:
Sat Jul 07, 2018 9:46 pm
Brive1987 wrote: There should be a prize for someone asking what a dummy spit is, being told and then .... having a dummy spit as a consequence.

:lol: :lol:
Who are you even replying to here? Even the voices in your head must be bored with you by now.
I have already forgotten what a dummy spit is. True story.

*sigh*

I just looked it up. OK. Never mind.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#819

Post by Ape+lust »

Lsuoma wrote: Sounds good to me - rayshul/Tigzy/Ape+Lust - you up for modding?
I've never taken a mod gig that I didn't regret.

But thanks for considering me, Boss :D

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#820

Post by Ape+lust »

The first 4 of those Thai soccer kids trapped in a cave have been rescued. After a couple of weeks of waiting, it was really looking like it wasn't going to happen. What a relief, I hope they get them all.

https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/thai ... index.html

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#821

Post by Tigzy »

Lsuoma wrote: Sounds good to me - rayshul/Tigzy/Ape+Lust - you up for modding?
Sure, I can be up for it. Never modded before though, so what will it likely involve?

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#822

Post by Tigzy »

Ape+lust wrote: The first 4 of those Thai soccer kids trapped in a cave have been rescued. After a couple of weeks of waiting, it was really looking like it wasn't going to happen. What a relief, I hope they get them all.

https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/thai ... index.html
*clicks metaphorical like button*

fuzzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#823

Post by fuzzy »

MarcusAu wrote:
fuzzy wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Take a look at the posters complaining about the hijack. Then tell me I'm full of shit. Go back a ways.
I suppose it's because I don't see it as a hijack so much as I see the dismantling of borders as the next logical step in SJW progress, the step where they apparently gain the support of several pitsters.
It's possible to be for open borders without being an SJW - it's a standard libertarian issue after all.

For a more conceptual type of border, the line between the Alt-Lite and the Alt-Right is semi-permiable at best, and non-existant at worst (or vice versa if you have a different take on this subject). At times it seems like it's really an optics issue - people are stating what they believe will apeal to the masses (or at least to more moderate members of their audience) - rather than take a principled stance.
I used open borders as a shorthand for a number of related issues. On most of those issues I see as contentious here on the Pyt, I suggest those of you seeking agreement and uniformity on those issues will find what you desire on a blog called Pharyngula.

fuzzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#824

Post by fuzzy »

Your people are waiting. Tell them how the current Nazi plague is due to toxic wbiteness and watch Peeze come in his pants for you.

ThreeFlangedJavis
.
.
Posts: 2181
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#825

Post by ThreeFlangedJavis »

MarcusAu wrote:
Sat Jul 07, 2018 11:34 pm
It's possible to be for open borders without being an SJW - it's a standard libertarian issue after all.
Yes, the ideologically challenged are quire plentiful.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#826

Post by Shatterface »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Because the pit used to be a good place
Steady on now...

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#827

Post by Shatterface »

fuzzy wrote: Your people are waiting. Tell them how the current Nazi plague is due to toxic wbiteness and watch Peeze come in his pants for you.
Has anybody here ever made an argument remotely like that?

fuzzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#828

Post by fuzzy »

Good news! Hillary seems to be gearing up for 2020.

https://nypost.com/2018/07/07/is-hillar ... n-in-2020/

fuzzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 2215
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#829

Post by fuzzy »

Shatterface wrote:
fuzzy wrote: Your people are waiting. Tell them how the current Nazi plague is due to toxic wbiteness and watch Peeze come in his pants for you.
Has anybody here ever made an argument remotely like that?
I hear you go Nazi Nazi Nazi with great regularity. Nazi.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#830

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

tigzy wrote:
lsuoma wrote: sounds good to me - rayshul/tigzy/ape+lust - you up for modding?
sure, i can be up for it. never modded before though, so what will it likely involve?
Well first there's an interview. Please answer the following questions as honestly as possible:

1) You are sitting on a bus in Zurich when you hear a fellow traveler use the word "ethnostate". do you a) ejaculate immediately; b) muse thoughtfully to yourself for a while; or c) get your iphone out, spend 45 minutes depositing the contents of your brain onto a website, and end up missing your intended stop outside Frau Blitzkrieg's "House of Gain" (home of Zurich's best Jewwurst, Himmlerschnitzel, and Annefrankenfurters)?

2) Should Sydney be renamed SSydney?

3) Muslims: a) more please, Mrs Merkel, or b) can we not make them go and live in the desert with the Abo's? At least keep them out of the North shore, please.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#831

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

As I documented a while ago, Greg Laden's FTB account has his details stored from some previous attempt at sockpuppeting or impersonation.

The fucking moron can't work out how to clear the username, so he has to keep explaining himself every time he comments.

Long may he continue being such a legendary fuckup.

https://i.imgur.com/r8NfsBV.png

https://i.imgur.com/8X2gpNV.jpg

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#832

Post by MarcusAu »

Tigzy wrote:
Lsuoma wrote: Sounds good to me - rayshul/Tigzy/Ape+Lust - you up for modding?
Sure, I can be up for it. Never modded before though, so what will it likely involve?
Transhumanism. And eventually, Singularity.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#833

Post by MarcusAu »

fuzzy wrote: Your people are waiting. Tell them how the current Nazi plague is due to toxic wbiteness and watch Peeze come in his pants for you.
Oh come one. Some of those Nazi's were very nice people.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#834

Post by MarcusAu »

I can make a list, if you insist.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#835

Post by Ape+lust »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: As I documented a while ago, Greg Laden's FTB account has his details stored from some previous attempt at sockpuppeting or impersonation.

The fucking moron can't work out how to clear the username, so he has to keep explaining himself every time he comments.

Long may he continue being such a legendary fuckup.

https://i.imgur.com/r8NfsBV.png

https://i.imgur.com/8X2gpNV.jpg
:lol: :lol: :lol:

LADEN, COME BAAAAAAACK!!

(This is a Slymepitter, not an APlusser.)

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#836

Post by Shatterface »

At last someone is taking ecology seriously:
Al Qaeda-Linked Somali Terrorist Group Bans Plastic Bags

Al-Shabab has declared plastic bags a "a serious threat to the well-being of humans and animals alike."


Somalia's so-called libertarian moment is over, now that Al Shabab—the Al Qaeda-linked Islamist terrorist organization that controls swaths of territory in the southern reaches of the anarchic, East African nation—has declared a prohibition on plastic bags.

News of the ban was first published on the reportedly Shabab-controlled site Somalimemo.net, which aired an audio recording of a Shabab official declaring the bags "a serious threat to the well-being of humans and animals alike."

The New York Times reports that Shabab-linked twitter accounts and radio stations later broadcast news of the ban.

Press reports did not include details of Shabab's enforcement strategy, but if its past behavior is any guide, penalties will be severe. The group already enforces prohibitions on music, movie theaters, and satellite TV, and is known for carrying out public executions of political rivals and homosexuals.

Other East African governments have also taken severe measures to crackdown on plastic bags. Since 2017, the government of Kenya—which is locked in a vicious war with Al-Shabab—has penalized mere possession of plastic bags with up to four years in prison or fines of $40,000.

Rwanda has banned plastic bags since 2008, earning it praise from environmental groups as "Africa's cleanest nation" while its police beat, humiliate, and imprison bag smugglers caught crossing into the country.

It is certainly true that in poorer countries without well-developed waste management systems, plastic pollution poses a significant problem. Loose bags and debris block waterways, pile up in neighborhoods, and wind up in the stomachs of livestock. Most of the plastic getting into the world's oceans comes from poor, populous coastal countries whose litter goes mostly uncollected.

Yet, judging by the thriving black markets for bags that have developed in Rwanda and other nations with bag bans, plenty of people still consider them necessities.

So while East Africa's crop of authoritarian regimes and terrorist organizations are not wrong to worry about plastic's effect on the environment, a more humane solution might be finding ways to improve its waste collection efforts, not hitting the world's poorest people with fines and—often—much worse penalties.
https://reason.com/blog/2018/07/05/al-q ... st-group-b

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#837

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Brive1987 wrote: Feelz. Fucking feelz everywhere. If only demographic facts could be applied.

Speaking of data and feelz.

I had heard most confederate monuments went up in the 1960s. And hence should be torn down

An anti right wing YouTuber I listen too. I know. WTF?

Had this graph.

http://i.imgur.com/fJlKRKN.jpg

He tied the monuments to Jim Crow. I don’t know. It seems it could also be the children of the veterans doing something. Stil, interesting divergent data point.

What on earth could account for all those civil war statues being erected fifty years after the civil war? Must have been a response to the NAACP.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#838

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Oh and FFS, the Pit has supposedly been on death's doorstep since I joined it five years ago.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#839

Post by MarcusAu »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Oh and FFS, the Pit has supposedly been on death's doorstep since I joined it five years ago.
You will promise to let us know when it's ready for the glue factory though?

InfraRedBucket
.
.
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#840

Post by InfraRedBucket »

Ape+lust wrote: The first 4 of those Thai soccer kids trapped in a cave have been rescued. After a couple of weeks of waiting, it was really looking like it wasn't going to happen. What a relief, I hope they get them all.

https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/thai ... index.html
They're a football team and if you look closely at the initial video clip when they were first found , it looks like one of then is wearing an England shirt.
(Red with the the 3 lions badge)
_102369399_p06csyhn.jpg
(6.97 KiB) Downloaded 106 times
"What, You still don't know England are in the semi finals, are you living in a cave or summat?"
=

Locked