Fuck off, Jamie!

Old subthreads
Locked
Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1561

Post by Tigzy »

Shatterface wrote: Also, Chris Morris did a whole show about pedophilia. It was hilarious.
Nonce Sense. :lol:

Suet Cardigan
.
.
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:26 am
Location: England, a bastion of barbarism and cluelessness

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1562

Post by Suet Cardigan »

Tigzy wrote:
Shatterface wrote: Also, Chris Morris did a whole show about pedophilia. It was hilarious.
Nonce Sense. :lol:
There hasn't been a truly great British comedy series since Brass Eye ended.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1563

Post by Shatterface »

Apart from 'Fuck Off, Jamie!' the comic potential of the SJWs has gone untapped.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1564

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

comhcinc wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: I certainly agree that Twitter mobs shouldn't decide careers (or anything else.) That said, live by the sword...
Nope. If I am going to defend one person for a certain action I am also going to defend others.
I'm not saying you shouldn't. That said, it does smack of just desserts. There is also a small chance a few people might hesitate before forming the next mob.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1565

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

MarcusAu wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2018 2:58 am
Shapiro has expressed some pretty harsh opinions on twitter.

To wit:
...so yes, they are all the same now.
Harsh opinion, sure. But is he wrong? Music generally has melody, harmony. It's fine to enjoy rap without claiming it's in the same catagory as Mozart.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1566

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Really? wrote:
Fri Jul 20, 2018 9:01 pm
You're burying the lede.
Is that what you call it?

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1567

Post by free thoughtpolice »

MarcusAu wrote: I'd put joking about pedophila and practising pedophila in different categories.
If words can literally kill, jokes can literally rape. :ugeek:

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1568

Post by DrokkIt »

free thoughtpolice wrote:
MarcusAu wrote: I'd put joking about pedophila and practising pedophila in different categories.
If words can literally kill, jokes can literally rape. :ugeek:
It's games without frontiers, war without tears

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1569

Post by MarcusAu »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Harsh opinion, sure. But is he wrong? Music generally has melody, harmony. It's fine to enjoy rap without claiming it's in the same catagory as Mozart.
Poor choice of words on my part. For 'Harsh' substitute 'Trivial'. That someone has an opinion on music (in all it's forms) or art (with a big or small 'a') or even politics that differs from my own and says so on twitter, is something I try to make a point of not getting riled up about.

But to answer your question - I would include rap as a form of music. If African tribal chants, didgeridoo recitals and thrash metal are in, then rap gets a pass too. (Even if all of them are still not quite the same as Mozart).

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1570

Post by free thoughtpolice »

The fuzz finally managed to bust some of those asshole telescammers. :clap: :dance:
https://globalnews.ca/news/4344992/indi ... paign=2014

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1571

Post by AndrewV69 »

erm ... she looks overpriced to me but whatever.


Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1572

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

AndrewV69 wrote: erm ... she looks overpriced to me but whatever.

Victoria Bateman -- what a hottie. She gets naked all the time but such a tease she never gives us a peek at that popozuda.

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1573

Post by rayshul »

I don't understand feminism

But that's got to be a personality problem right

screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2713
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1574

Post by screwtape »

AndrewV69 wrote: erm ... she looks overpriced to me but whatever.

Fat on a woman is like sugar in a teacup - it sinks to the bottom.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1575

Post by comhcinc »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2018 2:58 am
Shapiro has expressed some pretty harsh opinions on twitter.

To wit:
...so yes, they are all the same now.
Harsh opinion, sure. But is he wrong? Music generally has melody, harmony. It's fine to enjoy rap without claiming it's in the same catagory as Mozart.
Yes, he is wrong. Even based off what you just said, plenty of rap has melody, and plenty has harmony.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1576

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

rayshul wrote: I don't understand feminism

But that's got to be a personality problem right
She's a butterface, but she knows she's got a hawt bod and is flaunting it.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1577

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

screwtape wrote:
AndrewV69 wrote: erm ... she looks overpriced to me but whatever.

Fat on a woman is like sugar in a teacup - it sinks to the bottom.

KenD
.
.
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:04 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1578

Post by KenD »

AndrewV69 wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2018 12:50 pm
erm ... she looks overpriced to me but whatever.

I actually quite like the fact that she can show up to formal academic events dressed like this:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DfhFmojW4AUoL-K.jpg

Only for everyone in attendance to pretty much ignore her and just get on with it.

To me it seems properly British to tolerate eccentric oddballs without kicking up a fuss. Anything more than a raised eyebrow and a little tut-tutting is simply indulging their attention seeking. The negative responses on twitter just fuel her oppressed feminist victim whinging:

https://www.pluralist.com/posts/1195-fe ... ing-outfit

Not that I buy the idea that she's successfully exposing a patriarchal double standard when it comes to judgemental attitudes towards male and female nudity. Even if it's true that topless women are more sexualised than topless men, I can't see people being so indulgent and supportive towards a male academic who turned up similarly under dressed.

Just look back at Dr Matt Taylor and the whole "shirtstorm" kerfuffle from a few years back - if that shirt was accused of "creating a hostile environment for women" then a bloke in a transparent bodysuit would cause some serious #metoo pearl clutching.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1579

Post by Lsuoma »

Just watched episode 1 of "Who is America?": a worthy successor to "Brass Eye." The second segment is amazing.

KenD
.
.
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:04 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1580

Post by KenD »

Incidentally, the bodysuit Bateman's wearing above isn't some £14.99 crap picked up from the nearest Ann Summers sex shop, it's an exclusive work of art from feminist fashion designer Jenna Young:



God knows how much that particular piece cost, but bear in mind that a jacket from the same designer was selling for £1,200.

Of course she can spend her money how she likes, but for a lefty feminist who lectures people on how women are economically disadvantaged it strikes me as a bit Elfwick.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1581

Post by Really? »

What are the odds we can trick PZ into thinking that wearing this to his next presentation is the feminist thing to do?

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com ... SX385_.jpg

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1582

Post by comhcinc »

You do and I am coming after you Really?

Guest_b8931fdb

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1583

Post by Guest_b8931fdb »

If you don't like the new Doctor's sonic, it's because you're a misogynist.



Remember, even if you really enjoy the new Doctor, if you think the new Doctor's sonic looks like a sexual toy, it's because you're a misogynist.

[That's really it, too, although the other pictures showing it lighting up yellow and so not looking as much like either a lipstick or Jodie Whittaker's fun button.]

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1584

Post by Lsuoma »

Odd. What sort of screws will it drive?

Also, Hammer vs. Screwdriver? Mudbrooker?

Service Dog
.
.
Posts: 8652
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1585

Post by Service Dog »

Here's James Gunn's edgelord joke post, from 2010...



And the video it linked-to...


Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1586

Post by Really? »

Lsuoma wrote: Odd. What sort of screws will it drive?

Snip
Philips-never-give-head.

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1587

Post by AndrewV69 »

Godfrey Elfwick did not die in vain?


AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1588

Post by AndrewV69 »

KenD wrote: Incidentally, the bodysuit Bateman's wearing above isn't some £14.99 crap picked up from the nearest Ann Summers sex shop, it's an exclusive work of art from feminist fashion designer Jenna Young:



God knows how much that particular piece cost, but bear in mind that a jacket from the same designer was selling for £1,200.

Of course she can spend her money how she likes, but for a lefty feminist who lectures people on how women are economically disadvantaged it strikes me as a bit Elfwick.
Another fashion designer that hates women? Or perhaps she likes boys with minimal/no breasts?

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1589

Post by Ape+lust »

Really? wrote: What are the odds we can trick PZ into thinking that wearing this to his next presentation is the feminist thing to do?

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com ... SX385_.jpg
https://imgur.com/R1BBgcU.jpg

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1590

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

comhcinc wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2018 2:20 pm
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2018 2:58 am
Shapiro has expressed some pretty harsh opinions on twitter.

To wit:
...so yes, they are all the same now.
Harsh opinion, sure. But is he wrong? Music generally has melody, harmony. It's fine to enjoy rap without claiming it's in the same catagory as Mozart.
Yes, he is wrong. Even based off what you just said, plenty of rap has melody, and plenty has harmony.
For any human aesthetic endeavor we must draw the line somewhere, determining what is art, what is scribbles, what is music, what is noise. While everyone is allowed their own line, mine comes a while before semi-rhymes chanted over a drum machine. YMMV.

Also rap, and any sort of hippy-hoppy noise give me a near instantaneous headache. I can listen to Mongolian throat-singers and African Highlife music, but anything rap-like...bleh.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1591

Post by KiwiInOz »

Just checked into Keating's city. The south and central Asians in my group are wondering where everybody is.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1592

Post by Really? »

Ape+lust wrote:
Really? wrote: What are the odds we can trick PZ into thinking that wearing this to his next presentation is the feminist thing to do?

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com ... SX385_.jpg
https://imgur.com/R1BBgcU.jpg
Now I am happy to accept that Pauline is a woman.

Bhurzum
Brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead
Posts: 5059
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:08 am
Location: Lurking in a dumpster

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1593

Post by Bhurzum »



I wouldn't even stick a blade in that rats-ugly munter - fat, greasy, attention-seeking mental case.

Wrong side of bed this morning, fuck the world.

:bjarte:

Keating
.
.
Posts: 2421
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: South of anteater guy

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1594

Post by Keating »

KiwiInOz wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2018 9:31 pm
Just checked into Keating's city. The south and central Asians in my group are wondering where everybody is.
Can confirm that Kiwi looks exactly like s/h/it's avatar.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1595

Post by KiwiInOz »

Keating wrote:
KiwiInOz wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2018 9:31 pm
Just checked into Keating's city. The south and central Asians in my group are wondering where everybody is.
Can confirm that Kiwi looks exactly like s/h/it's avatar.
And bloody Keating keeps his sunglasses on, even at night time.

InfraRedBucket
.
.
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1596

Post by InfraRedBucket »

My favourite Twitter parody account was the Internet Police one a while back, was that Elfwick related?

Here's what someone on Twitter says about the Elwick account. (seems that this forum has a limit of 3 uploaded/embedded images per post.)
MWSnap129 2018-07-22, 11_09_34.jpg
(73.01 KiB) Downloaded 292 times
MWSnap130 2018-07-22, 11_09_43.jpg
(58.08 KiB) Downloaded 292 times
MWSnap131 2018-07-22, 11_09_55.jpg
(22.78 KiB) Downloaded 287 times
https://i.imgur.com/kXZoBqu.jpg

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1597

Post by comhcinc »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: While everyone is allowed their own line, mine comes a while before semi-rhymes chanted over a drum machine. YMMV.
Are you straw manning or really think that's all rap it?

I could pull out soooo many examples of high selling mainstream rap that disprove that but I am just gonna leave this here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aofoBrFNdg

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1598

Post by Shatterface »

Kenan Malik's Pandaemonium blog has joined WEIT on Pakistan's naughty step:

https://kenanmalik.com/2018/07/20/banned-in-pakistan/

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1599

Post by Tigzy »

Technically Ron is the textbook definition of a crybully. Dishes out tons of shit to people and when he gets shit back he pulls up his I-suffer-from-depression-leave-me-alone-god-twitter-is-so-toxic shield, at which the dull mooncalves who for some reason think Ron is both a funny and OK sorta guy rush in to his defence. He is, in short, a massive wanker.

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1600

Post by feathers »

AndrewV69 wrote:
Sat Jul 21, 2018 12:50 pm
erm ... she looks overpriced to me but whatever.

The study of economics has squat to do with anybody's rights.


(See, I can still focus on the topic)

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1601

Post by feathers »

comhcinc wrote:
Sun Jul 22, 2018 4:48 am
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: While everyone is allowed their own line, mine comes a while before semi-rhymes chanted over a drum machine. YMMV.
Are you straw manning or really think that's all rap it?

I could pull out soooo many examples of high selling mainstream rap that disprove that but I am just gonna leave this here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aofoBrFNdg
That sounds like... semi-rhymes chanted over a drum machine, mostly.

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1602

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

Rap is shite.

Service Dog
.
.
Posts: 8652
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1603

Post by Service Dog »


Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1604

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

Where are the musicians?

Still shite.

Service Dog
.
.
Posts: 8652
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1605

Post by Service Dog »


BoxNDox
.
.
Posts: 618
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 2:24 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1606

Post by BoxNDox »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: Rap is shite.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1607

Post by comhcinc »

feathers wrote:
That sounds like... semi-rhymes chanted over a drum machine, mostly.
Did you not see him playing the piano while belting out a harmony in his dulcet tones?

Kirbmarc
.
.
Posts: 10577
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:29 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1608

Post by Kirbmarc »

"Alternative RedPilled media" :bjarte:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrpukesetB4

Yeah...I'll stick to Reuters.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1609

Post by free thoughtpolice »

The only music worse than cunt and western is...

KenD
.
.
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:04 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1610

Post by KenD »

I don't have a whole lot of time for Bateman's nudie activism or many of her political views, but I think this is actually a decent little article about the collectivism and authoritarianism of modern feminism:

https://unherd.com/2018/02/feminism-may ... -lost-way/

I'm not at all surprised that it was complaints from fellow feminists that got a talk of hers memory-holed:
Not long afterwards, I noticed that the accompanying lecture delivered at the same event by a well-known and well-respected male colleague, who wore his usual suit, had been made available online. Mine had not. I was later told that a couple of attendees believed I was objectifying myself. They claimed to be feminists. My voice was, as a result, wiped from the face of history.
I've seen a number of organisations stand strong in the face of conservative morality based complaints, only to panic and fold as soon as someone drops a feminist buzzword like "objectification". They genuinely fear being condemned as sexist, and that can hand a few busybodies the power to no-platform and censor.

Honestly, I'm not saying this because I actually want to watch Bateman give a lecture with her tits hanging out...

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1611

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »


I know it's wrong. But also delicious.

It's possible that this might actually start a conversation about Twitter mobs, as a few regressives are now beginning to recognize the danger. The far-right has always used mobs, but now they're starting to use the internet more effectively. In short, Twitter is a cancer.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1612

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Bhurzum wrote: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DfhFmojW4AUoL-K.jpg
I wouldn't even stick a blade in that rats-ugly munter - fat, greasy, attention-seeking mental case.

Wrong side of bed this morning, fuck the world.

:bjarte:
There's no accounting for taste. I think she's amazing. I want to make babies with her.


Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1613

Post by Ape+lust »

That Elfwick-slaying wetnap and the bossy naked feminist go together nicely.

https://imgur.com/tUwn7cF.jpg

InfraRedBucket
.
.
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1614

Post by InfraRedBucket »

Is that modesty panel built into the costume? If so, it's not quite a "nude "protest, is it?

Apparently it was protest against Brexit.
Depends on the viewer's taste if it's hard or soft.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1615

Post by Tigzy »

Ape+lust wrote: That Elfwick-slaying wetnap and the bossy naked feminist go together nicely.

https://imgur.com/tUwn7cF.jpg
😂😂😂 That's fucking great. I may have to nick that, dude.

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1616

Post by DrokkIt »

Bhurzum wrote:


I wouldn't even stick a blade in that rats-ugly munter - fat, greasy, attention-seeking mental case.

Wrong side of bed this morning, fuck the world.

:bjarte:
Oh come on, she's nobody's ideal, but I've been to Scotland- you lot would be hanging out the back of this thiccness in no time.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1617

Post by KiwiInOz »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Bhurzum wrote: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DfhFmojW4AUoL-K.jpg
I wouldn't even stick a blade in that rats-ugly munter - fat, greasy, attention-seeking mental case.

Wrong side of bed this morning, fuck the world.

:bjarte:
There's no accounting for taste. I think she's amazing. I want to make babies with her.

snip
It's the braids, isn't it. See, you and Brive aren't so far apart after all.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1618

Post by Ape+lust »

Tigzy wrote: 😂😂😂 That's fucking great. I may have to nick that, dude.
Yes, absolutely! I've enjoyed watching that guy's day of panic, he's proved it's possible to look mortified without being seen or heard :lol:

Bhurzum
Brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead
Posts: 5059
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:08 am
Location: Lurking in a dumpster

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1619

Post by Bhurzum »

DrokkIt wrote: Oh come on, she's nobody's ideal, but I've been to Scotland- you lot would be hanging out the back of this thiccness in no time.
Susan Boyle.

Checkmate.

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1620

Post by DrokkIt »

Bhurzum wrote:
DrokkIt wrote: Oh come on, she's nobody's ideal, but I've been to Scotland- you lot would be hanging out the back of this thiccness in no time.
Susan Boyle.

Checkmate.
TBH this simply supports my position re: the scots.

Locked