Fuck off, Jamie!

Old subthreads
KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#61

Post by KiwiInOz »

Who is Jamie, and why does s/h/it need to fuck off?

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#62

Post by feathers »

KiwiInOz wrote:
Sat Jun 30, 2018 12:22 am
Who is Jamie, and why does s/h/it need to fuck off?
Perhaps he meant "Fuck off Jamie [Lee]" without the comma?

https://s.blogcdn.com/blog.moviefone.co ... 092410.jpg

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#63

Post by Brive1987 »

Such civility and politeness online. I had forgotten how that felt.

http://i.imgur.com/ponlDkM.jpg


DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#64

Post by DrokkIt »

Brive1987 wrote: Such civility and politeness online. I had forgotten how that felt.

http://i.imgur.com/ponlDkM.jpg

Why don't you just deep-fake your avatar and Faith's faces onto some porn and be done with it?

:cdc: :o

InfraRedBucket
.
.
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#65

Post by InfraRedBucket »

I don't routinely watch his stuff but this latest one popped up on my YT suggestions:


Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#66

Post by Brive1987 »

DrokkIt wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: Such civility and politeness online. I had forgotten how that felt.

http://i.imgur.com/ponlDkM.jpg

https.://youtu.be/Ue5fGXTGdEQ
Why don't you just deep-fake your avatar and Faith's faces onto some porn and be done with it?

:cdc: :o
Meta is not your strength. I hope you can cook.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#67

Post by Shatterface »

Kirbmarc wrote:
Fri Jun 29, 2018 11:18 pm
He's just ahead of the curve.

https://i.imgur.com/3ZidINK.png?1
This means it's hotter in the US, right?

One of my favourite science book titles is We Have to Talk About Kelvin

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#68

Post by DrokkIt »

Brive1987 wrote:
DrokkIt wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: Such civility and politeness online. I had forgotten how that felt.

http://i.imgur.com/ponlDkM.jpg

https.://youtu.be/Ue5fGXTGdEQ
Why don't you just deep-fake your avatar and Faith's faces onto some porn and be done with it?

:cdc: :o
Meta is not your strength. I hope you can cook.
No, but I have been to Neuschwanstein castle and other Rhineland gothic piles, inbox me for tales of the blonde braids I saw.

:P

Kirbmarc
.
.
Posts: 10577
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:29 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#69

Post by Kirbmarc »

Brive1987 wrote: Such civility and politeness online. I had forgotten how that felt.

http://i.imgur.com/ponlDkM.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyFQVZ2h0V8

Senpai noticed you!

I hope your wife isn't jealous.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#70

Post by Brive1987 »

DrokkIt wrote:
No, but I have been to Neuschwanstein castle and other Rhineland gothic piles, inbox me for tales of the blonde braids I saw.

:P
We did the Rhine and Prague as a family last October. Excellent. Had to take a pass on Neuschwanstein due to Munich being October-fes’ed.

But yes, I realise gold braids are metaphors.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#71

Post by Ape+lust »

Brive1987 wrote: Such civility and politeness online. I had forgotten how that felt.

http://i.imgur.com/ponlDkM.jpg

Good on you, Brive! Recognition is always nice :clap: :dance:

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#72

Post by Brive1987 »

Kirbmarc wrote:
Senpai noticed you!

I hope your wife isn't jealous.
Smile and you will lose a wrinkle.

But as I said. It was the tone that struck me.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#73

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Was that Daisy Gray there covering Chris Isaak? I saw him do it live, so I'm picky about the 117 covers of that song. But I like hers - she gets the anguish right.

Here it is without Brive's porn:


Others:
Charlotte Cardin -- the munchkin version, no feeling
Daughtry -- eh. Slick musically, but he's not angry or worried, just sad. cf. Crashed.
Allen James -- less a cover than a clone. But the kid's got talent.
Pink - Meh. thought she'd do better, but probably realizes the song is about her. cf. Just Give Me A Reason

Wolf Alice - yet another waif, but they get it all: the bitterness, the angst, plus a tangy on-the-verge-of-going-mental vibe not in the original:



Of the many instrumentals, I think this one with cello captures the melancholia:




And here's my girl. As in the original, the surf guitar evokes so much emotion, and she can hit pained high notes like no other, while dropping to almost talking to express the anger:




Winner: the original, with Wolf Alice the cover winner.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#74

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

A friend's post containing this just appeared on my Facebook.

I'm a bit worried: if I don't share the image, I will have been weeded out as gayphobic. But if I do share it, that would clearly make me an insufferably self-righteous prick. So what do I do?

https://i.imgur.com/nRpb1Q9.png

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#75

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: A friend's post containing this just appeared on my Facebook.

I'm a bit worried: if I don't share the image, I will have been weeded out as gayphobic. But if I do share it, that would clearly make me an insufferably self-righteous prick. So what do I do?

https://i.imgur.com/nRpb1Q9.png
Post that old "Good Morning, Son!" pic that used to some Pitter's avatar.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#76

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Just found this minimalist version, which imo works well. It feels like she feels it:



But, Christ, you limies need to feed your women more.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#77

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

The song is crying out for a decent metal version. Think I found it:



Okay, I'm done.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#78

Post by Brive1987 »

I choose my porn tracks carefully. Most of the covers, including London Grammar, sound as if they are self-consciously squeezing a shit out.

I settled on Annaca.


Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#79

Post by Ape+lust »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: The song is crying out for a decent metal version. Think I found it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa2lxOFM23Q

Okay, I'm done.
H.I.M.'s cover isn't great, but it's not bad either. What's remarkable is that the song can be converted into downstroked power fifths and still come off decent.


Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#80

Post by Brive1987 »

Annaca also had the best Europe-y vibe and a useful beat in the instrumentals.

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#81

Post by DrokkIt »

Brive1987 wrote:
DrokkIt wrote:
No, but I have been to Neuschwanstein castle and other Rhineland gothic piles, inbox me for tales of the blonde braids I saw.

:P
We did the Rhine and Prague as a family last October. Excellent. Had to take a pass on Neuschwanstein due to Munich being October-fes’ed.

But yes, I realise gold braids are metaphors.
Enjoy it while you can- once we are in control auslanders will be verboten!

Hunt
.
.
Posts: 3282
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#82

Post by Hunt »

Re Chris Isaak, I reserve the right to check the freezer for body parts for anyone who still wears a pompadour.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#83

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Ape+lust wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote: The song is crying out for a decent metal version. Think I found it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa2lxOFM23Q

Okay, I'm done.
H.I.M.'s cover isn't great, but it's not bad either. What's remarkable is that the song can be converted into downstroked power fifths and still come off decent.

Might have turned out better if HIM didn't suck beyond belief.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#84

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Brive1987 wrote: Annaca also had the best Europe-y vibe and a useful beat in the instrumentals.
All' die ganze Schlager Affen dürfen da singen, dürfen ihre Schrott zu Vortrage bringen.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#85

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Ape+lust wrote: What's remarkable is that the song can be converted into downstroked power fifths and still come off decent.
I heard a local band do reggae version. It worked as a song, but not the song.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#86

Post by Brive1987 »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: Annaca also had the best Europe-y vibe and a useful beat in the instrumentals.
All' die ganze Schlager Affen dürfen da singen, dürfen ihre Schrott zu Vortrage bringen.
http://i.imgur.com/F7RpMy3.jpg

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#87

Post by Ape+lust »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Ape+lust wrote: What's remarkable is that the song can be converted into downstroked power fifths and still come off decent.
I heard a local band do reggae version. It worked as a song, but not the song.
I clicked the first of several reggae covers that came up on YouTube, and I thought: no way is this not going to sound silly... and it was surprisingly good... at least, until they used autotune for the yodelled notes. The song is very resilient in odd genres, but it can't survive autotune :D

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#88

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Brive1987 wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: Annaca also had the best Europe-y vibe and a useful beat in the instrumentals.
All' die ganze Schlager Affen dürfen da singen, dürfen ihre Schrott zu Vortrage bringen.
http://i.imgur.com/F7RpMy3.jpg

dogen
.
.
Posts: 2585
Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 1:06 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#89

Post by dogen »

KiwiInOz wrote: Who is Jamie, and why does s/h/it need to fuck off?

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#90

Post by Lsuoma »

KiwiInOz wrote: Who is Jamie, and why does s/h/it need to fuck off?
Google for bbc woke

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#91

Post by Shatterface »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: A friend's post containing this just appeared on my Facebook.

I'm a bit worried: if I don't share the image, I will have been weeded out as gayphobic. But if I do share it, that would clearly make me an insufferably self-righteous prick. So what do I do?

https://i.imgur.com/nRpb1Q9.png
Who the hell can be bothered with being homophobic these days? Some dudes like dudes, some gals like gals. Unless you are religious nobody gives a shit. Even Stonewall had to expand it's remit to trans to keep itself in business.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#92

Post by Shatterface »

Lsuoma wrote:
KiwiInOz wrote: Who is Jamie, and why does s/h/it need to fuck off?
Google for bbc woke
I've downloaded the entire series on the strength of that sketch.

I haven't watched any Tracy Ullman since she fucked off to America but this and the outrage coming from the Corbynistas makes me think I should catch up.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#93

Post by MarcusAu »

Shatterface wrote:
Who the hell can be bothered with being homophobic these days? Some dudes like dudes, some gals like gals. Unless you are religious nobody gives a shit. Even Stonewall had to expand it's remit to trans to keep itself in business.
Are you not keeping up with the Alt-Right?

Degeneracy is back baby.

Trad-Life is the shit...and the gay stuff is not included in it.

Ennui has got up and on went.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#94

Post by Lsuoma »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: A friend's post containing this just appeared on my Facebook.

I'm a bit worried: if I don't share the image, I will have been weeded out as gayphobic. But if I do share it, that would clearly make me an insufferably self-righteous prick. So what do I do?

https://i.imgur.com/nRpb1Q9.png
Get the fuck off tardbook. This advice is free.

John D
.
.
Posts: 5966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#95

Post by John D »

BoxNDox wrote:
Fri Jun 29, 2018 8:19 am
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Wed Jun 27, 2018 7:10 pm
Sometimes I really hate being fucking Cassandra.

Americans blame law-breaking parents, not Trump, for border separation
Yep, called this one myself and got yelled at for it, although I didn't expect the swing to be quite this big.

It's actually pretty fucking obvious when Haidt's moral foundations theory into account.
To a large extent American's feel that the US is a nation of laws. Laws should not be wildly and strangely interpreted by activist judges or political actors. Trump appeals to law and order types such as myself, on these topics.

The left is losing their minds over their feelings and the center is getting scared of the left leaning politicians. Sure, you can be a socialist in particular sections of large coastal cities, but the vast center of the country is turning more and more toward Trump... and not away from him.

By the way... I am on vacation visiting with my brother-in-law in the western part of Virginia. He is a judge and his wife is a county prosecutor. He has a big house on the top of a mountain, horses, a big garden, chickens, beagles, and a great butterfly garden. Fantastic. He and I agree on most things political. I found it especially interesting last night as we discussed crime around here. Almost no blacks are criminals and they never see the black population in court. The number of blacks is small, and they are all conservative Baptists. The crime rate is a bit high here due to the large drug use and high unemployment.

He sleeps with a 9mm semi-auto Reuger next to his bed because people have threatened to kill him... not in some random Facebook post... right to his face. Of course, he means it when he tells them he will be killing them if they come to his house. I would have guns ready if I lived here too. The closest cop is at least 20 minutes away.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#96

Post by Brive1987 »

Apparently Bostock’s latest parody song lasted a couple hours on YouTube before being holed.

Here is the song in question.

https://pewtube.com/user/DanielBostock/9xYl1oL

Poor dude is thinking of starting a patreon account.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#97

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

John D wrote:
To a large extent American's feel that the US is a nation of laws. Laws should not be wildly and strangely interpreted by activist judges or political actors. Trump appeals to law and order types such as myself, on these topics.
[/quote]
How does laundering money for the mafia fit into that?

The left is losing their minds over their feelings and the center is getting scared of the left leaning politicians.
It's been Feelz B4 Realz with them for some time, but trump has induced emotional anaphylaxis in them. Mass ape shit.

CommanderTuvok
.
.
Posts: 3744
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#98

Post by CommanderTuvok »

Shatterface wrote: ...Tracey Ullman...
The series isn't that great, but there is fun to be had when the Corbynistas get upset when she makes of Corbyn. They argue that satire should "punch up", but Corbyn is a politician, is white, is cis, is straight, is a possible next Prime Minister......satirizing Corbyn is fucking punching up. All politicians should be mocked. The countries where only certain politicians can be mocked, tend to be the really shitty ones where no sensible person wants to live.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#99

Post by Brive1987 »

MarcusAu wrote:
Shatterface wrote:
Who the hell can be bothered with being homophobic these days? Some dudes like dudes, some gals like gals. Unless you are religious nobody gives a shit. Even Stonewall had to expand it's remit to trans to keep itself in business.
Are you not keeping up with the Alt-Right?

Degeneracy is back baby.

Trad-Life is the shit...and the gay stuff is not included in it.

Ennui has got up and on went.
You’re slipping. You forgot the mandatory glubb-ite link.


John D
.
.
Posts: 5966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#100

Post by John D »

feathers wrote:
Steersman wrote:
Fri Jun 29, 2018 10:49 am
But aren't those the same millennials who clog universities with their postmodernist bullshit?
The University SJWs are still a minority... but a vocal minority. This is why young educated white men are turning to conservative politics. These SJWs are quite literally trying to destroy their lives. My daughter attends an urban university and is way more conservative than I was at her age. She still thinks da gays are being discriminated against, but she is very right leaning on topics of jobs, welfare, economics etc. She really only dislikes Trump because of his trolling and aggressive language. Otherwise, she is pretty okay with him.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#101

Post by MarcusAu »

Brive1987 wrote: ...
You’re slipping.
...
Compared to you - everyone's slipping...

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#102

Post by Shatterface »

What's 'gayphobic'anyway? Whatever happened to 'homophobia'?

I can't keep up with the fucking millenials.

JayTeeAitch
.
.
Posts: 595
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:54 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#103

Post by JayTeeAitch »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Fri Jun 29, 2018 11:26 am
Kirbmarc wrote:
Shatterface wrote:
The best point against hate crime laws is the one raised by Commissioner Peter Kirsanow during the hearing I attended:

He directed his questions to all of us, and invited anyone who possessed the information to answer.

"Are you aware of any data, studies, or other evidence, that shows designating a crime a hate crime deters, prevents, or reduces that crime, and second, whether designating a crime a federal hate crime reduces, deters, or prevents incidents of that crime?" he asked.

Neither I nor any of the other panelists were aware of such information, and so the panel fell silent.

Kirsanow continued. "Then, one other question: are you aware of any databases, study, or other evidence that shows designating a crime a hate crime, whether a municipal, federal, or state crime, assists in the resolution of that crime or the apprehension of the perpetrator?" he asked.

Again, silence.

"Thank you, Madame Chair," he said, yielding the floor.
http://reason.com/blog/2018/06/29/hate- ... -black-man
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odcvqVCgHdk
God I loved that show
A friend of the family played the lass in that - i always remember being impressed by her dad extinguishing table candles by licking his fingers and pinching the wick - something I'd never seen my dad do. Mind you, thinking about it, probably cos we never had fucking candles on the dining table.

Just seen she's in an upcoming film about Brexit. Something for Tigzy to put in the calendar :D

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brexit_(film)

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#104

Post by Tigzy »

JayTeeAitch wrote: Just seen she's in an upcoming film about Brexit. Something for Tigzy to put in the calendar :D

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brexit_(film)
I'll pass. I mean, she's okay and I probably would tap that. But not to the point of marking dates in a diary for when she's gonna be on the telly.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#105

Post by Lsuoma »

So here is my prediction, just a coupla days before the Pit's sixth birthday (Monday): Repubs are going to retain both houses this autumn. Leftards will double down significantly in the coming months, and normal people will hold their noses and vote red.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#106

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Shatterface wrote: What's 'gayphobic'anyway? Whatever happened to 'homophobia'?
Homophobia is an irrational fear of homosexual intercourse.

Gayphobia is a rational fear of all things gay -- like espadrilles, for example.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#107

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Lsuoma wrote: So here is my prediction, just a coupla days before the Pit's sixth birthday (Monday): Repubs are going to retain both houses this autumn. Leftards will double down significantly in the coming months, and normal people will hold their noses and vote red.
It's a done deal at this point. Their orgiastic frenzy ranks up there with the Münster Anabaptists.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#108

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Lsuoma wrote: So here is my prediction, just a coupla days before the Pit's sixth birthday (Monday): Repubs are going to retain both houses this autumn. Leftards will double down significantly in the coming months, and normal people will hold their noses and vote red.
Not going to happen. The Deep State is going to round up all the cuntservative Trumptards and throw them into all the detention centers that are currently holding innocent migrant children. President Dotard J Trump will flee in Airforce One to Moscow where Putin will grant him asylum and throw him a big fancy parade for all his hard work in trying to destroy the US and their former allies.
Faith Goldy will lose her virginity to a black man with a gigantic penis and will join The Young Turks. :ugeek:

JayTeeAitch
.
.
Posts: 595
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:54 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#109

Post by JayTeeAitch »

Tigzy wrote:
Sat Jun 30, 2018 10:05 am
JayTeeAitch wrote: Just seen she's in an upcoming film about Brexit. Something for Tigzy to put in the calendar :D

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brexit_(film)
I'll pass. I mean, she's okay and I probably would tap that. But not to the point of marking dates in a diary for when she's gonna be on the telly.
I meant the film as a whole - it's got benadict cummerbund in it and is likely to be heavily Remain slanted - thought you might like to watch something to rankle your cockles ;)

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#110

Post by Tigzy »

JayTeeAitch wrote: I meant the film as a whole - it's got benadict cummerbund in it and is likely to be heavily Remain slanted - thought you might like to watch something to rankle your cockles ;)
Might be worth a watch, considering how starved we are of Brexit on the telly. :bjarte:

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#111

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Kirsten Gillebrand, who stabbed Al Franken in the back, is a loose cannon:

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3949 ... itmus-test
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) on Thursday became the first senator to call for the scrapping of ICE, arguing that it has become “a deportation force.”

But while calls to abolish ICE are popular with liberals, it could also be a risky move for a party that needs to win suburban seats to take back the House majority, and Senate seats in states won by Trump to win the upper chamber.

A former Senate Democratic leadership aide warned the calls from senators such as Gillibrand could pose dangers for some of her colleagues.

“She’s running for president,” said the source, who requested anonymity to discuss Gillibrand’s motives. “It’s something that is tricky for red-state senators.”

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#112

Post by Lsuoma »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Kirsten Gillebrand, who stabbed Al Franken in the back, is a loose cannon:

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3949 ... itmus-test
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) on Thursday became the first senator to call for the scrapping of ICE, arguing that it has become “a deportation force.”

But while calls to abolish ICE are popular with liberals, it could also be a risky move for a party that needs to win suburban seats to take back the House majority, and Senate seats in states won by Trump to win the upper chamber.

A former Senate Democratic leadership aide warned the calls from senators such as Gillibrand could pose dangers for some of her colleagues.

“She’s running for president,” said the source, who requested anonymity to discuss Gillibrand’s motives. “It’s something that is tricky for red-state senators.”
Like I said, Leftards are doubling down.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#113

Post by Brive1987 »

free thoughtpolice wrote:
Lsuoma wrote: So here is my prediction, just a coupla days before the Pit's sixth birthday (Monday): Repubs are going to retain both houses this autumn. Leftards will double down significantly in the coming months, and normal people will hold their noses and vote red.
Not going to happen. The Deep State is going to round up all the cuntservative Trumptards and throw them into all the detention centers that are currently holding innocent migrant children. President Dotard J Trump will flee in Airforce One to Moscow where Putin will grant him asylum and throw him a big fancy parade for all his hard work in trying to destroy the US and their former allies.
Faith Goldy will lose her virginity to a black man with a gigantic penis and will join The Young Turks. :ugeek:

Sorry. She is on a mission from God.

Interesting chat from this morning. And no Lauren Rose, meaning it’s Goldy time, all the time.



Goldy touches on:

SJWism has moved on from gender, race is their new chosen battlefield. That’s a challenge for the pit.
Don’t say the 14 words if you want to keep your job. Or at least transpose white with aboriginal.
Canadians are too polite to generate a Pat Buchanan (she hasn’t met Free Thought obviously)
Canadians are instinctively too quick to scream nazi (maybe she has met Free Thought)
South African whites should stay in place and my emulate African “refugees”. Take that Lauren.
The prospect of violence in Europe vs USA
Nationalist Christianity and the Tower of Babel as the first attempt at multiculti.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#114

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Lsuoma wrote: Like I said, Leftards are doubling down.
And now they think pressuring their own Red State Dem senators will somehow prevent a conservative from getting nominated for the SC.
The boost for the GOP won't come from Trump's SCOTUS pick, but the likely progressive reaction to it. And to paraphrase a bit of advice from Animal House: Mad, #Woke and wacky is no way to go through the midterms, liberals.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/commentary ... l-benefit/

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#115

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Fortunately Brive has listened to this drivel so we don't have to.
Canadians are too polite to generate a Pat Buchanan (she hasn’t met Free Thought obviously)
She should know very well that we have generated lots of Pat Buchanan types. She is one and has worked with worse at Sun news and Rebel media.
Canadians are instinctively too quick to scream nazi (maybe she has met Free Thought)
Do you understand the different range of nuance in the word "nazi"? Like for instance the official UN version vs. the Sargon of Akkad version. You are obviously not well educated or clever enough to understand the true meaning of nazi.
Or that Hyperbole is a mythical land invented by the Greeks that presumably existed within the Arctic Circle. :P

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#116

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Lsuoma wrote: Like I said, Leftards are doubling down.
And now they think pressuring their own Red State Dem senators will somehow prevent a conservative from getting nominated for the SC.
The boost for the GOP won't come from Trump's SCOTUS pick, but the likely progressive reaction to it. And to paraphrase a bit of advice from Animal House: Mad, #Woke and wacky is no way to go through the midterms, liberals.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/commentary ... l-benefit/
The Dems have shown time and again they are expert at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. If they insist on letting the loony left from taking over the party as they appear to be doing they are going to chase away independents and disenfranchised Repubs, and give the more moderate faction of the Dems to stay home.
It's sad but the Repubs will likely keep power in the midterms and could reelect Trump if he manages to stay out of jail.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#117

Post by Brive1987 »

free thoughtpolice wrote: Fortunately Brive has listened to this drivel so we don't have to.
Canadians are too polite to generate a Pat Buchanan (she hasn’t met Free Thought obviously)
She should know very well that we have generated lots of Pat Buchanan types. She is one and has worked with worse at Sun news and Rebel media.
Canadians are instinctively too quick to scream nazi (maybe she has met Free Thought)
Do you understand the different range of nuance in the word "nazi"? Like for instance the official UN version vs. the Sargon of Akkad version. You are obviously not well educated or clever enough to understand the true meaning of nazi.
Or that Hyperbole is a mythical land invented by the Greeks that presumably existed within the Arctic Circle. :P
You really shouldn’t take my take without watching.

The Buchanan item was specifically referring to the political sphere (as in ‘who, right now is Canada’s PB?”).

I also know that “nazi” is just a variant of the SJ “misogynist” used to shut down conversation. Never a good look. A definition is superfluous to need.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#118

Post by Brive1987 »

free thoughtpolice wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Lsuoma wrote: Like I said, Leftards are doubling down.
And now they think pressuring their own Red State Dem senators will somehow prevent a conservative from getting nominated for the SC.
The boost for the GOP won't come from Trump's SCOTUS pick, but the likely progressive reaction to it. And to paraphrase a bit of advice from Animal House: Mad, #Woke and wacky is no way to go through the midterms, liberals.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/commentary ... l-benefit/
The Dems have shown time and again they are expert at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. If they insist on letting the loony left from taking over the party as they appear to be doing they are going to chase away independents and disenfranchised Repubs, and give the more moderate faction of the Dems to stay home.
It's sad but the Repubs will likely keep power in the midterms and could reelect Trump if he manages to stay out of jail.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#119

Post by KiwiInOz »

dogen wrote:
KiwiInOz wrote: Who is Jamie, and why does s/h/it need to fuck off?
Ah. Of course.

Jamie? Fuck off!

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#120

Post by Brive1987 »

A jury has been dismissed in the trial of an Uber driver accused of planning a sword attack at Buckingham Palace, after it failed to reach a verdict.

Mohiussunnath Chowdhury, 27, from Luton, denies preparing acts of terrorism, claiming he only wanted himself to get killed.

Mr Chowdhury drove to the palace on 25 August last year with a samurai sword, the Old Bailey previously heard.

The jury were discharged on Friday after nearly 19 hours of deliberations.

The prosecutor, Tim Cray, said he would seek a retrial.

The trial previously heard that two police officers suffered cuts to their hands as they tried to disarm and arrest Mr Chowdhury outside the royal palace.

Mr Chowdhury, of Kirkwood Road, told the Old Bailey that he was upset at the role of the UK government in arming Saudi Arabia and the deaths of innocent people in Yemen.
So upset at the Govt that he had to kill himself. :think:

Locked