Fuck off, Jamie!

Old subthreads
Locked
Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#241

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Ape+lust wrote:
dogen wrote: Hey putters - in the ER with a racing heart. Bets are divided between blood clot and thyroid!
Tell them you just got off a plane from west Africa. They'll see you ahead of everybody. It's worked for me.

Be well, dogen. We're a dwindling tribe, we need you :D
Just as soon as they don the HazMats, but yeah, all is fair in Love and the ER.

Make sure to say that on a scale of 1 to 10, this is the Worst Pain Evah! Everyone one else lies and us honest saps get stuck bleeding on the waiting room floor for 3 hours.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#242

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Puking in front of the admission nurse works, too.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#243

Post by comhcinc »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Ape+lust wrote:
dogen wrote: Hey putters - in the ER with a racing heart. Bets are divided between blood clot and thyroid!
Tell them you just got off a plane from west Africa. They'll see you ahead of everybody. It's worked for me.

Be well, dogen. We're a dwindling tribe, we need you :D
Just as soon as they don the HazMats, but yeah, all is fair in Love and the ER.

Make sure to say that on a scale of 1 to 10, this is the Worst Pain Evah! Everyone one else lies and us honest saps get stuck bleeding on the waiting room floor for 3 hours.
Saying you are diabetic helps too I have found. At the very least they put in a room quickly to be monitored. Even if they then leave you alone for hours.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#244

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

and if you're in the mood for some sedation, shouting "What planet are you taking me to?!" should do the trick.

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#245

Post by AndrewV69 »

BoxNDox wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:44 pm
Shatterface wrote: high vibration nourishment
You'd think I'd learn not to do it at some point. I googled "high vibration nourishment" and now I haz a sad.

And when did "Head Chef" get verbed?
For some reason I put those on my list of "never do a search on this". Incidentally that list also includes "alaskan pipelinel"

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#246

Post by comhcinc »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: and if you're in the mood for some sedation, shouting "What planet are you taking me to?!" should do the trick.
I can never figure out how to ask for pain meds. Like I don't want to come off as a junkie looking for a fix but fuck I am if I am at the emergency room I am in a lot of pain.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#247

Post by Lsuoma »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Ape+lust wrote:
dogen wrote: Hey putters - in the ER with a racing heart. Bets are divided between blood clot and thyroid!
Tell them you just got off a plane from west Africa. They'll see you ahead of everybody. It's worked for me.

Be well, dogen. We're a dwindling tribe, we need you :D
Just as soon as they don the HazMats, but yeah, all is fair in Love and the ER.

Make sure to say that on a scale of 1 to 10, this is the Worst Pain Evah! Everyone one else lies and us honest saps get stuck bleeding on the waiting room floor for 3 hours.
Saying that is a good way to get a dose of neck-gripper (hydromorphone/Dilaudid) which is fucking awesome. I can easily see how people get hooked on that.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#248

Post by Brive1987 »

For the first time in my life, I have actually looked into American political structure. Albeit superficially.

How very bizarre.

Now the filibuster rule XXII has been dented and dented again - why not fuck it off, impose a maximum reasonable period for debate, consistent with the Senates high idea of itself, and get back to The original 51/49 vote custom? The 60 / 40 rule was not envisaged by sage founders and only arose because the senate fucked up by forgetting to specify a method to close debate.

And what’s up with the lack of party voting discipline? Why bother having parties 🎉 if you keep crossing the floor? And why then have whips if everyone’s a proud individual?

It seems to me a miracle that any laws get passed (especially dramatic ones) and I can’t see how a broad agenda requiring multiple aligned legislative bills could ever occur. Vision has been banned.

In a sane world, the will of the people, expressed in 2016, would reflect in the Capital. Trump as executive in charge of security would demand the requisite tools in the form of better perimeter defence. The Republican majorities in the upper and lower houses would sign off on their CEO’s budget bill and work would get underway.

As promised.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#249

Post by Brive1987 »

Who is meant to be in charge in the USA? Who is elected to set the vision for strategic (ie over arching and long term) change? And who is then empowered to act for their duration of scrutiny? The Prez appears to be in charge of making things work but not necessarily defining why they work that way, or why they should work differently in future. “implementing and enforcing” is the role of a General Manager. Not a CEO.

But the house is, to all appearances, strategically dysfunctional.

I don’t get it.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#250

Post by Brive1987 »

In Australia, the Senate is a combination of UK and USA approaches. It secures states rights with fixed representation and can reject legislation, but cannot introduce legislation. One one dramatic exception it has never vetoed budget or supply bills.

Both Houses vote strictly along party lines. Typically a small number of Independents control the Senate. Making negotiation both required and likely to work.

The govt forms from the party with a majority in the lower house. The Prime Minister is elected by his/her party. With party line voting, an agenda in theory can be executed and then watered down with concessions in the senate.

The titular head of state is removed from all this executive/legislative activity by being vested in the Governor General, who is appointed by the Government, does nothing that’s not ceremonial, and in a magic act of transfiguration actually represents the Queen. Providing a cultural fixed point to the circus.

Seems to work.

Except for bipartisan support for mass immigration. Which pretty much makes the whole thing moot. But oh well.

Hunt
.
.
Posts: 3282
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#251

Post by Hunt »

Brive1987 wrote: Who is meant to be in charge in the USA? Who is elected to set the vision for strategic (ie over arching and long term) change? And who is then empowered to act for their duration of scrutiny? The Prez appears to be in charge of making things work but not necessarily defining why they work that way, or why they should work differently in future. “implementing and enforcing” is the role of a General Manager. Not a CEO.

But the house is, to all appearances, strategically dysfunctional.

I don’t get it.
It's called checks and balances. Like all things political, it's designed so nothing can ever get done. Oh, and also to prevent anyone from ever getting too powerful. The "founding fathers" were paranoid of that, since we were breaking free from some bitch country. Can't remember the name right now.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#252

Post by Brive1987 »

I’m actually appalled we have a political system that reflects a colonial white-centric view of politics at odds with our pluralism. Our politics is simply not diverse.

We should have a third (aboriginal) chamber with veto, especially over the privileged budget.

We should offset institutional bias with a community elected rainbow president who can introduce legislation. Im imagining an electoral college where each of the majority-minorities gets a proportional number of votes.

All bills should have to pass through committees which bring appropriate ethnic narratives to the table. Sharia, maybe some Confucianism or Daoism. Definitely benefit from Somali tribal perspectives. A committee for each should do. These committees could return bills for rewrites where they fail to deliver inclusiveness. Oh heck. They could also introduce modifications.

Anything less is racist.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#253

Post by Brive1987 »

Hunt wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: Who is meant to be in charge in the USA? Who is elected to set the vision for strategic (ie over arching and long term) change? And who is then empowered to act for their duration of scrutiny? The Prez appears to be in charge of making things work but not necessarily defining why they work that way, or why they should work differently in future. “implementing and enforcing” is the role of a General Manager. Not a CEO.

But the house is, to all appearances, strategically dysfunctional.

I don’t get it.
It's called checks and balances. Like all things political, it's designed so nothing can ever get done. Oh, and also to prevent anyone from ever getting too powerful. The "founding fathers" were paranoid of that, since we were breaking free from some bitch country. Can't remember the name right now.
Inability to easily change the constitution.
Clear distinction between federal and state powers.
Separation of high court from parliament.
An election every few years.
The theoretical power of the Head of State to dismiss the govt.
but see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Au ... nal_crisis

These are all great checks and balances. Dysfunction is the lazy way out.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#254

Post by Brive1987 »

I’m actually quite serious. It is clear both parties are waiting for Queen Beth to cark it and then the Oz Republican debate will be back on.

Last time it died because the wet-libs knew what they wanted to shaft - the damn Queen and her GG. They just couldn’t come up with an alternative.

The public weren’t stupid enough to trust the Govt to elect the Prez. Even though that’s what they do now - but currently we know assume that ERII wouldn’t be amused with any funny business surrounding her GG.

On the other hand the Politicians could see the (then) larrikin public electing a ‘boaty mcboat face’ President. Paul Hogan maybe. Or Shane Warne. Maybe bring Delvene Delaney out of retirement. Most likely a footy player. Kinda look dumb swapping the Queen for Kanga.

So stalemate. Bickering. And the “leave it it ain’t broke” school won.

I fear this time liberal sentiment and demographic change will produce a different result.

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#255

Post by rayshul »

Feel better soon, dogen, and hope your arse is less luminous. :D

On another note...

How do you feel about #walkaway? I'm fascinated.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#256

Post by Really? »

InfraRedBucket wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:25 am
Welcome to "WomanFest"..... or not..
Anyone told Muscato?


DhAmeyaX4AAQ3gm.jpg


https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... rhood-song
"We have to draw the line somewhere...

Beautiful. Looks like Trump will he God Emperor through at least 2040.

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#257

Post by feathers »

Shatterface wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:09 pm
So the profits of the woman's day festival are going towards Tree Sisters - a charity for the great feminist cause of planting trees??

Not domestic violence shelters, not women's health, not sanitary products for women in the Third World, not FGM, not even the evils of manspreading, but fucking trees?
Smash the patreearchy!

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#258

Post by Really? »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 6:02 am
And now there's an Occupy against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... eparations

The Dems are gonna get crushed in November.
And now their 2020 candidates are being expected to follow suit with ending laws at the borders...they are going to lose, but civil War 2.0 will be far shorter than the first, seeing as one side of the 2020 conflict hates assault weapons, which is any gun.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#259

Post by Really? »

Brive1987 wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 4:49 pm
dogen wrote: Hey putters - in the ER with a racing heart. Bets are divided between blood clot and thyroid!
Bugger. Best luck. You are in the best hands. :)

Personally, if this doesn’t kill you ...

http://i.imgur.com/xEYF5Oa.jpg

I’d go thyroid.

And now I’ve hit my medical knowledge wall.

Take care.

OMG. She is so unhealthy. She needs to gain at least 100 pounds and get problem glasses to ease the misery she must feel.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#260

Post by Brive1987 »

protein shake perhaps?

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#261

Post by AndrewV69 »

Really? wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 10:25 pm
Brive1987 wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 4:49 pm
dogen wrote: Hey putters - in the ER with a racing heart. Bets are divided between blood clot and thyroid!
Bugger. Best luck. You are in the best hands. :)

Personally, if this doesn’t kill you ...

http://i.imgur.com/xEYF5Oa.jpg

I’d go thyroid.

And now I’ve hit my medical knowledge wall.

Take care.

OMG. She is so unhealthy. She needs to gain at least 100 pounds and get problem glasses to ease the misery she must feel.
Agreed. Way too skinny. Andddd to top it off it looks like she is a blond . 2/10 Would not bang.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#262

Post by Brive1987 »

Hmm. My wife is a US size 4.

If I wanted fat I'd buy it marbled in a t-bone.

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#263

Post by feathers »

dogen wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 5:47 pm
Thanks for all the well wishes. Looks like my thyroid. But I got a big laff in the CT scan, the contrast chemical lit my butt cheeks on fire.
Sure it wasn't the spanking?

InfraRedBucket
.
.
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#264

Post by InfraRedBucket »

DhDftJhXcAA0zrx.jpg
(74.95 KiB) Downloaded 210 times
All "women" are "women", sorry..excerpt when they are "menstruators" ,
or should that be womenstruators?

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#265

Post by feathers »

InfraRedBucket wrote:
Mon Jul 02, 2018 12:27 am
DhDftJhXcAA0zrx.jpg

All "women" are "women", sorry..excerpt when they are "menstruators" ,
or should that be womenstruators?
I'm surprised they haven't come up with 'mynstruation' yet.

Hunt
.
.
Posts: 3282
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#266

Post by Hunt »

Brive1987 wrote: Hmm. My wife is a US size 4.

If I wanted fat I'd buy it marbled in a t-bone.
http://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/2018/0 ... cover.html

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#267

Post by Brive1987 »

Hunt wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: Hmm. My wife is a US size 4.

If I wanted fat I'd buy it marbled in a t-bone.
http://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/2018/0 ... cover.html
Hunt wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: Hmm. My wife is a US size 4.

If I wanted fat I'd buy it marbled in a t-bone.
http://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/2018/0 ... cover.html
revenge is a dish best served cold.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#268

Post by Ape+lust »

I couldn't leave that GIF CH20 dragged in here alone.

If Pitters were in charge of Hell...


Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#269

Post by Brive1987 »

Hahah - you should watermark your work so I don't have to keep referencing you on Twitter.

ThreeFlangedJavis
.
.
Posts: 2181
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#270

Post by ThreeFlangedJavis »

Hunt wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 8:37 pm
Brive1987 wrote: Who is meant to be in charge in the USA? Who is elected to set the vision for strategic (ie over arching and long term) change? And who is then empowered to act for their duration of scrutiny? The Prez appears to be in charge of making things work but not necessarily defining why they work that way, or why they should work differently in future. “implementing and enforcing” is the role of a General Manager. Not a CEO.

But the house is, to all appearances, strategically dysfunctional.

I don’t get it.
It's called checks and balances. Like all things political, it's designed so nothing can ever get done. Oh, and also to prevent anyone from ever getting too powerful. The "founding fathers" were paranoid of that, since we were breaking free from some bitch country. Can't remember the name right now.
What Hunt said.Channeling the great sage Jordan, it is a lot easier to fuck up a complex system than to improve it so the founding fathers wisely idiot-proofed the system as much as they could without actually paralysing it. Seems wise because, face it, most democracies where the governing party gets to implement their myopic "vision" end up with a wild oscillation between two opposing ideologies.

That "bitch country" is where your "founding fathers" got their political philosophy from. Bunch of ingrate ex-pats.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#271

Post by Ape+lust »

Brive1987 wrote: Hahah - you should watermark your work so I don't have to keep referencing you on Twitter.
:D

Thank you, Brive. I might if I ever remember. Credit or no, I don't mind either way. I do like the stuff being seen though, and always appreciate it when you post to Twitter :dance:

Did you happen to catch Peez grousing in this weekend's video about the gay porn shoops he gets in the mail? I've listened to him bitch about it for over 10 years and from the way he tells it, it's been an endless deluge. He'll share any other garbage that lands in his inbox, but he's never posted a single sample of the gay porn.

I've never seen any in the Pit, but that hasn't stopped him from insinuating that we're the source.

I think old Peez probably suffers from homophobia in the literal sense -- scared and sickened by gay sex, so yeah, it would be terribly insulting... if he wasn't a brave and enlightened feminist.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#272

Post by Brive1987 »

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote:
Hunt wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 8:37 pm
Brive1987 wrote: Who is meant to be in charge in the USA? Who is elected to set the vision for strategic (ie over arching and long term) change? And who is then empowered to act for their duration of scrutiny? The Prez appears to be in charge of making things work but not necessarily defining why they work that way, or why they should work differently in future. “implementing and enforcing” is the role of a General Manager. Not a CEO.

But the house is, to all appearances, strategically dysfunctional.

I don’t get it.
It's called checks and balances. Like all things political, it's designed so nothing can ever get done. Oh, and also to prevent anyone from ever getting too powerful. The "founding fathers" were paranoid of that, since we were breaking free from some bitch country. Can't remember the name right now.
What Hunt said.Channeling the great sage Jordan, it is a lot easier to fuck up a complex system than to improve it so the founding fathers wisely idiot-proofed the system as much as they could without actually paralysing it. Seems wise because, face it, most democracies where the governing party gets to implement their myopic "vision" end up with a wild oscillation between two opposing ideologies.

That "bitch country" is where your "founding fathers" got their political philosophy from. Bunch of ingrate ex-pats.
We have resolved the "wild oscillations" by possessing two indistinguishable parties. Politics is so fucking bland here that you are legally forced to vote.

At least we weren't dumb enough to pick a work day for elections. Saturday provides for a nice party where you can get drunk, hurl abuse at the TV and then sleep in.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#273

Post by Brive1987 »

Ape+lust wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: Hahah - you should watermark your work so I don't have to keep referencing you on Twitter.
:D

Thank you, Brive. I might if I ever remember. Credit or no, I don't mind either way. I do like the stuff being seen though, and always appreciate it when you post to Twitter :dance:

Did you happen to catch Peez grousing in this weekend's video about the gay porn shoops he gets in the mail? I've listened to him bitch about it for over 10 years and from the way he tells it, it's been an endless deluge. He'll share any other garbage that lands in his inbox, but he's never posted a single sample of the gay porn.

I've never seen any in the Pit, but that hasn't stopped him from insinuating that we're the source.

I think old Peez probably suffers from homophobia in the literal sense -- scared and sickened by gay sex, so yeah, it would be terribly insulting... if he wasn't a brave and enlightened feminist.
No problems, I am happy to bask in your light. :dance:

Yes I did see that. In fact I detected a slight hand tremor. PZ may be scared and sickened by gay sex, but that doesn't stop him ironing the prints flat and carefully filing them .... to be reviewed when Mary heads off to the mall.

:cdc:

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#274

Post by Ape+lust »

Hunt wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: Hmm. My wife is a US size 4.

If I wanted fat I'd buy it marbled in a t-bone.
http://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/2018/0 ... cover.html
Self Magazine wrote:Holliday identifies as a fat woman; we chose to give her a platform, blah, blah, blah....
WTF does that even mean, she "identifies" as a fat woman?

Westerners are right on the edge of collectively disappearing up own own assholes. On. The. Edge.

I'll bet China, Russia, and the Muslim middle east are tickled every shade of pink by our antics.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#275

Post by KiwiInOz »

Ape+lust wrote:
Self Magazine wrote:Holliday identifies as a fat woman; we chose to give her a platform, blah, blah, blah....
WTF does that even mean, she "identifies" as a fat woman?

Westerners are right on the edge of collectively disappearing up own own assholes. On. The. Edge.

I'll bet China, Russia, and the Muslim middle east are tickled every shade of pink by our antics.
This blimp identifies as Tess Holliday.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/467976 ... 00x394.jpg

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#276

Post by Brive1987 »

i’ve spent the night listening to Pod Save America episodes.

Interesting listening to ex Obama admin staff screaming about “literal Hitler” Trump. It’s like bizarro land.

:popcorn:

These dudes really are angrier zealots than even the alt lite / right crowd.

Seriously. And I’m in a place to really compare and contrast.

Hunt
.
.
Posts: 3282
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#277

Post by Hunt »

Ape+lust wrote:
Hunt wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: Hmm. My wife is a US size 4.

If I wanted fat I'd buy it marbled in a t-bone.
http://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/2018/0 ... cover.html
Self Magazine wrote:Holliday identifies as a fat woman; we chose to give her a platform, blah, blah, blah....
WTF does that even mean, she "identifies" as a fat woman?

Westerners are right on the edge of collectively disappearing up own own assholes. On. The. Edge.

I'll bet China, Russia, and the Muslim middle east are tickled every shade of pink by our antics.
If her ink is real, she's got Miss Piggy tattooed on her forearm, so props for that. That's world class trolling.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#278

Post by Ape+lust »

KiwiInOz wrote: This blimp identifies as Tess Holliday.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/467976 ... 00x394.jpg
Fish with tits?!

I know someone who'd hit it.

https://imgur.com/iqKtfd8.jpg

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#279

Post by Ape+lust »

Hunt wrote: If her ink is real, she's got Miss Piggy tattooed on her forearm, so props for that. That's world class trolling.
Self Magazine wrote:SELF is wellness you can trust. --- about Self
Seems like everybody's trolling us.

Look who else is in this issue of the wellness mag:

https://imgur.com/dkr2N7m.jpg

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#280

Post by comhcinc »

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote:
Hunt wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 8:37 pm
Brive1987 wrote: Who is meant to be in charge in the USA? Who is elected to set the vision for strategic (ie over arching and long term) change? And who is then empowered to act for their duration of scrutiny? The Prez appears to be in charge of making things work but not necessarily defining why they work that way, or why they should work differently in future. “implementing and enforcing” is the role of a General Manager. Not a CEO.

But the house is, to all appearances, strategically dysfunctional.

I don’t get it.
It's called checks and balances. Like all things political, it's designed so nothing can ever get done. Oh, and also to prevent anyone from ever getting too powerful. The "founding fathers" were paranoid of that, since we were breaking free from some bitch country. Can't remember the name right now.
What Hunt said.Channeling the great sage Jordan, it is a lot easier to fuck up a complex system than to improve it so the founding fathers wisely idiot-proofed the system as much as they could without actually paralysing it. Seems wise because, face it, most democracies where the governing party gets to implement their myopic "vision" end up with a wild oscillation between two opposing ideologies.

That "bitch country" is where your "founding fathers" got their political philosophy from. Bunch of ingrate ex-pats.
The system from the beginning was designed not to work well. That's an actual feature, not a bug.

Now that's not saying it hasn't been fucked up some. There were no political parties, limited voting rights, and what I think is the biggest mistake, is the Senate was "picked by the state" instead of in a general election.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#281

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Ape+lust wrote: I couldn't leave that GIF CH20 dragged in here alone.

If Pitters were in charge of Hell...

Good God.

"So, Stephanie was dressed in a leather bikini, when this well-muscled young man approached me from behind and...well, you don't want to know what happened next".

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#282

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

InfraRedBucket wrote: DhDftJhXcAA0zrx.jpg
I'm sure they provide free pads & tampons at the mental hospital in which you should be confined.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#283

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Ape+lust wrote: WTF does that even mean, she "identifies" as a fat woman?
It means she calls herself "fat", but you can't just go around calling anyone who's 5' 5" and 280 lbs "fat".

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#284

Post by DrokkIt »

Shatterface wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:09 pm
So the profits of the woman's day festival are going towards Tree Sisters - a charity for the great feminist cause of planting trees??

Not domestic violence shelters, not women's health, not sanitary products for women in the Third World, not FGM, not even the evils of manspreading, but fucking trees?

Is there anything about this whole festival and it's organisers, that doesn't scream peak middle-class fart-sniffing hippie bullshit?

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#285

Post by Tigzy »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: I wondered what Nerd was blathering about on Meyers's blog about this, so I skipped around the video including the timestamp he mentions. Firstly, it seems like just a fat old man chatting with about 5 people in the livechat box. But it seems there was also someone in there during the recording who called themselves NerdofRedhead. Not the most subtle or amusing of troll attempts, but I guess they got Nerd worried his valuable online presence was being hijacked. (It wasn't me.)

https://i.imgur.com/X4rhpmL.png
Heh. I used to use NerdOfRedhead as a twitter nym, long ago. However, just in case Catpeezle or his noted deranged sycophant are lurking, the hangout troll wasn't me. Honestly, watching that moon-faced yeti waffle on about muh social justice for hours on end ain't my definition of an amusing and edifying pastime.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#286

Post by Lsuoma »

Happy Sixth Pit Birthday, folks!

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#287

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Lsuoma wrote: Happy Sixth Pit Birthday, folks!
https://media.giphy.com/media/MoXl633ASfada/giphy.gif

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#288

Post by MarcusAu »

Now We Are Six

When I was one,
I had just begun.

When I was two,
I was nearly new.

When I was three,
I was hardly me.

When I was four,
I was not much more.

When I was five,
I was just alive.

But now I am six,
I'm as clever as clever.

So I think I'll be six now
for ever and ever.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#289

Post by Lsuoma »

Heh heh!!

Trudeau accused of getting handsy at music festival in BC in 2000:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44687654

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#290

Post by Shatterface »

DrokkIt wrote:
Shatterface wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:09 pm
So the profits of the woman's day festival are going towards Tree Sisters - a charity for the great feminist cause of planting trees??

Not domestic violence shelters, not women's health, not sanitary products for women in the Third World, not FGM, not even the evils of manspreading, but fucking trees?

Is there anything about this whole festival and it's organisers, that doesn't scream peak middle-class fart-sniffing hippie bullshit?
If it wasn't for Matt Taylor's shirt they'd all be leading productive lives in STEM fields.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#291

Post by comhcinc »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0YXMhoDqpk

Suet Cardigan
.
.
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:26 am
Location: England, a bastion of barbarism and cluelessness

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#292

Post by Suet Cardigan »

There were no farmers or baths in Europe before whitey landed in America:

Taught.png
(81.83 KiB) Downloaded 157 times

screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2713
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#293

Post by screwtape »

Suet Cardigan wrote: There were no farmers or baths in Europe before whitey landed in America:


Taught.png
Open a book? I'm picking something by James Fenimore Cooper.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#294

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

MarcusAu wrote: Now We Are Six

When I was one,
I had just begun.

When I was two,
I was nearly new.

When I was three,
I was hardly me.

When I was four,
I was not much more.

When I was five,
I was just alive.

But now I am six,
I'm as clever as clever.

So I think I'll be six now
for ever and ever.
"Now We Are Six" sounds like multiple personality disorder.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#295

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Six is being touted as the ultimate age. What happens when the kid gets older?

Now I am seven.
I've died and gone to Heaven

Now I am eight.
Think I'll reincarnate

Now I am Nine.
I embody the divine.

Now I am Ten.
It's back to Heaven again.

That's all I got.

katamari Damassi
.
.
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#296

Post by katamari Damassi »

Suet Cardigan wrote: There were no farmers or baths in Europe before whitey landed in America:


Taught.png
True fact: Before the colonization of the Americas, the city of Bath was originally called Filth.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#297

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

katamari Damassi wrote:
Suet Cardigan wrote: There were no farmers or baths in Europe before whitey landed in America:


Taught.png
True fact: Before the colonization of the Americas, the city of Bath was originally called Filth.
:lol: :lol: :clap: :clap:

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#298

Post by Shatterface »

They did give us lung cancer and syphylis though so let's not belittle Native American contributions to European culture.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#299

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

comhcinc wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0YXMhoDqpk
Yeah, no.

You're gonna have to repost that as a gif, I understand no other language now, Commie. Me when you don't gif your message:

https://media.giphy.com/media/CM4wAovIoMjyU/giphy.gif

katamari Damassi
.
.
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#300

Post by katamari Damassi »

Suet Cardigan wrote: There were no farmers or baths in Europe before whitey landed in America:


Taught.png
If white people can be referred to as "colonizer," can white people refer to everyone else as "colonized?"

Locked