If thou gazest long into the Pit, the Pit will also gaze into thee

Pretty sure the third debate ain't happening, either:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/nbc-krist ... ontroversy

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ I fear a Harris presidency will result in a totalitarian, one-party state.

With all respect to you, Matt, which party is it that is suggesting that the result of the election must be fought as ineligible?

Oddly enough, I probably have a lot more in common with you than with an enthusiast for President Harris. She's not my thing, and nor was Hillary. I'm willing to pinch my nose and vote for the lesser evil up here, where nobody is particularly good at either evil or saintliness. I think I may have said before that the function of a good swing voter is not to vote for what you want, it is to vote out that which has failed.

Oh, I missed the 'checks and balances' part. Wouldn't it be rather difficult for President Harris to change your constitution, which would be required to remove the checks and balances? And why are they part of capital "R" Republican government, if they are written into your constitution, which itself was ratified in 1789 (not necessarily an auspicious year if one takes a wider view), and the Republican Party was founded 65 years later in 1854?

Maybe I'm just JAQi'ng off, as the Pharyngulites like to say, when they have no answers, and I'm honestly not trying to put you on the spot. Merely an outsider whose wife said over breakfast today "If they vote for him, they deserve him." My reply, "Yes, but do we?" Hence, you see, you vote not just for yourselves, but for the government of a powerful nation that affects many of us elsewhere (and how democratic is that?)

I'm tending to agree with you screwy. There seems to be something about Ms Harris that gives normally placid pitters an attack of the vapours and leaves them clutching their pearls. So she's either Hecate herself, with a magic pussy that has somehow got her to the heights of VP nominate, Morloch the devourer of children and minorities, or a hard arsed woman who has clawed her way to the top in a dog eat dog political world and that is not lady-like.

screwtape wrote: ↑ With all respect to you, Matt, which party is it that is suggesting that the result of the election must be fought as ineligible?

Why that’d be the party that spent the past four years as “The Resistance” refusing to accept the
last election’s results, culminating in a bogus impeachment.

The party that still claims Stacey Abrams is the governor of Georgia, despite her having lost by 55,000 votes.

The party that’s saying shit like this:

screwtape wrote: ↑ Oh, I missed the 'checks and balances' part. Wouldn't it be rather difficult for President Harris to change your constitution, which would be required to remove the checks and balances? And why are they part of capital "R" Republican government, if they are written into your constitution, which itself was ratified in 1789 (not necessarily an auspicious year if one takes a wider view), and the Republican Party was founded 65 years later in 1854?

The United States of America has a republican, Federal form of government. That has nothing to do with the names of the parties.

Our Founders carefully erected a set of strong checks and balances among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Their intention was to make it difficult to rapidly head off in any one direction. So far, it's worked wonderfully for us, far better than the rest of you poor sods. In comparison, we are on our First Republic; the French are on their fifth, with a couple of emperors interspersed.

Harris has vowed as president to begin ruling by executive order if Congress does not pass the legislation she desires, especially gun confiscation, within 100 days. She is in favor of adding new justices to the Supreme Court -- guaranteed to be more of the hard left jurists who 'legislate from the bench', ignoring the wording of the law if it hinders their social engineering agenda, that Dems prefer. The Democratic-controlled House has already passed a resolution to make Washington D.C. a state, despite the Constitution explicitly prohibiting it. Puerto Rico statehood, splitting California into five new states, are all Dem schemes to wrest permanent control over the Senate. They seek to abolish the Electoral College, which would effectively allow the residents of a dozen counties dictate the course of our entire nation. Instant citizenship to every illegal in the country, followed by chain migration and who knows how many new, instant-citizen immigrants crossing the open border, will ensure a solid dem popular vote advantage. The Supreme Court, packed with politicized, left-wing justices, will bless all of this and more.

The US will in short order end up like fucking Zimbabwe.

Maybe I'm just JAQi'ng off, as the Pharyngulites like to say, when they have no answers, and I'm honestly not trying to put you on the spot. Merely an outsider whose wife said over breakfast today "If they vote for him, they deserve him." My reply, "Yes, but do we?" Hence, you see, you vote not just for yourselves, but for the government of a powerful nation that affects many of us elsewhere (and how democratic is that?)

Do you want a global Chinese hegemony? If no, then root for Trump, cuz Biden has always been China's bitch, and the oligarchs who've supported Kamala from the start, and hand-picked her as the true POTUS candidate, will continue to sell out America and the West to China if that bitch gets into the Oval Office.

I think the Dem base has become temperamentally unfit to wield power.

Most recent example: a longtime friend and work associate-- since before Obama-- was talking about Trump saying there were 'good people on both sides' of the confederate flag debate. My friend contends there are NO good people in favor of the flag. Not even people who just love the Dukes of Hazard car. Not even his own family (he was actual hillbilly until age 10 when his dad died. ((in an unlicensed home built airplane!!!!)) then his stepdad was more cosmopolitan.). Presumably-- not even my chink gf & me. She has a framed Nashville Pussy concert poster in our bedroom, including rebel flag in the logo.)

Same guy has an 'everything should be free' view on healthcare, college, housing, food, cars... He's a skilled furniture builder. He speaks like an educated person. But his temperament is disconnected from what used-to be required to be taken seriously in discourse. He's off on some unreal cloud. A generation ago, grown-ups wouldn't have even bickered with him. They would have smiled, nodded & conducted business far away from him. Now his equivalent is rising in power. AOC. Greta Thunberg. Don Lemon.

In other news...

This crime brûlée torch is great for fighting a cockroach outbreak/ re enacting Starship Troopers at small scale.

Gets into small crevices under kitchen sink. :burn: :burn: :burn: :burn: :burn: :burn:

After some thought over lunch, I’ve decided to formally endorse Trump for President in 2020.
Written and typed by Brive1987

screwtape wrote: ↑ Wouldn't it be rather difficult for President Harris to change your constitution

Formal constitutional power isn't the only power under assault.

For example: the news media. Look at how the New York Times journalist's Union is calling for Management to exert more censorship of New York Times journalists:

https://theintercept.com/2020/10/11/the ... olleagues/

Biden and Kamala pander to these woke extremist cannibals: 'Antifa is an idea'. They are the greater evil.

For all his faults, Trump is solid against SJWs.

Brive1987 wrote: ↑ After some thought over lunch, I’ve decided to formally endorse Trump for President in 2020.
Written and typed by Brive1987

Mic drop.

Declare the election for Trump now.

KiwiInOz wrote: ↑

Brive1987 wrote: ↑ After some thought over lunch, I’ve decided to formally endorse Trump for President in 2020.
Written and typed by Brive1987

Mic drop.

Declare the election for Trump now.

I guess we heard it here first.

Let’s celebrate.

What I don't get is the attempted rehabilitation of president Bush who still seems like the worst president in recent history. I can't say I care one way or the other about Trump's shitposting, but he still seems significantly better than Bush and Obama. I'm too young to really remember Clinton.

Recently, Americans of both hues are rarely satisfied unless they are bombing someone.
Trump is a massive disappointment who must be punished.

Fancy not decrying all that white supremacy burning down his cities.

🤷‍♂️

Brive1987 wrote: ↑

KiwiInOz wrote: ↑

Brive1987 wrote: ↑ After some thought over lunch, I’ve decided to formally endorse Trump for President in 2020.
Written and typed by Brive1987

Mic drop.

Declare the election for Trump now.

I guess we heard it here first.

Let’s celebrate.

I'd eat it.

I thought you were a kiwi, not a bin chicken

I’m having involuntary, pornographic, soul destroying flashes featuring Berejiklian.

This must stop.

Normally I don't go for quickie youtube science vids because you learn just enough to be utterly useless, but this one is so bizarre that I do. And it also answers a long term question I've always had but didn't realize. I flip a tennis racket now and then and always wondered why the damn things want to invert when I do.

screwtape wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 11, 2020 3:52 am

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ I mean, debate, singular. Dems will find an excuse to cancel the rest.

Half right is better than all wrong. :D I was surprised that Biden managed to appear, simulate, or actually be quite functional. It makes me pretty sure all that obvious facial immobility was Botox.
I read your scary post on Harris. It appears she is more of a traditional politician; scheming, conniving and power-hungry. Gimmicks like identity politics can get you elected, but you don't succeed and get re-elected unless you make life better for the average voter. To go OTT, one imagines a crazy pol being elected on a platform of reparations for all oppressed minorities, but the consequences would mean no second term. Successful politicians are willing to do what the majority of voters want in order to stay in power. Trump got that bit right for a start, but has failed to change in response to the public's mood changing; instead he has stuck with the same script and it doesn't look like it will fly a second time.

I think Trump is badly misunderstood. The common narrative is that he is a pandering populist. I disagree. I think he understands that the US has been operating on a model created at the end of WWII to maintain stability at some economic cost. The cost to the blue collar worker is no longer justified by current circumstances and he is prepared to negotiate a new relationship with the World. He has a strategic plan and he has managed to implement it to some extent. He approaches issues without the old assumptions. His electability depends on how well voters understand what he is doing.

In the normal course of things one would think that Harris would wear out her welcome very quickly, however that might depend on the Democrats capacity to spread misinformation about the alternatives, their willingness to import voters and to monkey with the electoral system.

Keating wrote: ↑ What I don't get is the attempted rehabilitation of president Bush who still seems like the worst president in recent history. I can't say I care one way or the other about Trump's shitposting, but he still seems significantly better than Bush and Obama. I'm too young to really remember Clinton.

Obama was worse than Shrub in many ways. Wars, privacy, immigration are just three

Hunt wrote: ↑ Normally I don't go for quickie youtube science vids because you learn just enough to be utterly useless, but this one is so bizarre that I do. And it also answers a long term question I've always had but didn't realize. I flip a tennis racket now and then and always wondered why the damn things want to invert when I do.

IIRC, a body will rotate stably around only two of the equivalent parallelepiped's orthogonal axes, namely the longest and shortest. I don't know or remember what happens when two or all three are equivalent. It's easy to see by playing with an Amazon box (no, I'm not talking about Steffi Graf's cunt).

Lsuoma wrote: ↑

Mon Oct 12, 2020 7:04 am

Keating wrote: ↑ What I don't get is the attempted rehabilitation of president Bush who still seems like the worst president in recent history. I can't say I care one way or the other about Trump's shitposting, but he still seems significantly better than Bush and Obama. I'm too young to really remember Clinton.

Obama was worse than Shrub in many ways. Wars, privacy, immigration are just three

Obama embodied everything the Dems accuse Trump of. Trump tells the press they're full of crap when they're full of crap, Obama had them surveilled and got all threateny with them. Respect for the constitution, Obama was always being pulled up by the Supreme Court. Puppet AG, I give you Eric Holder and his highly politicised JD. He was basically Obama's lawyer and stuffed his department with Prog activists. Quite disturbing how the JD was corrupted under Obama https://www.catholic.org/news/politics/ ... p?id=71747. They attack Barr because they assume everyone is as corrupt as they are. Obama promised to cut down on the military adventurism and then went on a killing spree. It should also never be forgotten that the Obama admin used the security services to attack their opponent. Clinton and Obama were compromised by their policy failures on Russia and by the Clinton Foundation's dealings with Russians. Never knew much about Michelle Obama, but that video she just put out about BLM reeks of race-baiting, gaslighting, hypocritical nastiness. There's your normal dishonest and corrupt politicking, but what is being shown by the current Democrats is an unprecedentedly cynical power grab utilising economic destruction and violence. It stuns me that the Democrats can be seen as the lesser of 2 evils.

Lsuoma wrote: ↑

Keating wrote: ↑ What I don't get is the attempted rehabilitation of president Bush who still seems like the worst president in recent history. I can't say I care one way or the other about Trump's shitposting, but he still seems significantly better than Bush and Obama. I'm too young to really remember Clinton.

Obama was worse than Shrub in many ways. Wars, privacy, immigration are just three

Suspension of habeas corpus, 'due process' defined as assassinations of US citizens off a 'hit list', barring 1A free assembly of groups petitioning the government for redress, double-tap drone strikes and other war crimes under Geneva and Hague, letting BP off scot-free for the oil spill, opening pristine Arctic wildlands to drilling, stealth eradication of the wild mustangs, not enforcing EPA air quality regs, a bogus 'green economy' that funneled federal dollars to the sham renewable energy start-ups of mega-donors, bending over for China at the climate summits, letting the insurance lobby write the 'health' [not -care] bill, massive deportations and, yes, children in cages ... the list goes on.

All things the lefties were apoplectic about when Shrub did them, or later when Trump was accused of doing, yet silent when The Lightbringer did them.

Found on FB:

screwtape wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:28 pm

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ I fear a Harris presidency will result in a totalitarian, one-party state.

With all respect to you, Matt, which party is it that is suggesting that the result of the election must be fought as ineligible?

Oddly enough, I probably have a lot more in common with you than with an enthusiast for President Harris. She's not my thing, and nor was Hillary. I'm willing to pinch my nose and vote for the lesser evil up here, where nobody is particularly good at either evil or saintliness. I think I may have said before that the function of a good swing voter is not to vote for what you want, it is to vote out that which has failed.

Anonymous voting in person at a secure election station is the time-honoured way for good reason. Trump is trying to keep it that way and the Dems are planning on getting tens of millions of ballots sent through the mail. The normal checks and balances applied in absentee voting will not apply, creating opportunities for coercion and a host of ways of voting fraudulently. Arranging safe in person polling is not rocket science. Hand sanitiser at the door, spacing in the queue and even disinfection of pencils or keyboards (or whatever is used) between votes and you are set. Perhaps even hold a 2 day election to minimise crowding. Why are the Democrats so set against it? Why do they insist on enabling fraud? The logistics are a nightmare and there is certain to be a long and fractious wait for the result. They've gathered their lawyers and are singing their "Trump the Dictator" song again. Based on their recent behaviour I would say that they are priming their base to revolt if Trump doesn't submit to a loss with widespread irregularities and/or want to create chaos and uncertainty if they look to have lost. I can't be sure of the motives, but one party wants a securer vote, the other doesn't.

KiwiInOz wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 11, 2020 3:27 pm

I'm tending to agree with you screwy. There seems to be something about Ms Harris that gives normally placid pitters an attack of the vapours and leaves them clutching their pearls. So she's either Hecate herself, with a magic pussy that has somehow got her to the heights of VP nominate, Morloch the devourer of children and minorities, or a hard arsed woman who has clawed her way to the top in a dog eat dog political world and that is not lady-like.

Because she displayed an uncommon, and rather shameless consistency in blatantly corrupt decision making in her prosecutorial career. Couple that with her holier than thou, scornful attitude and hypocritical moralising and you have a less than appealing result. I first learned to despise her during the Kavanaugh hearings. She was supercilious and very dishonest in her obvious attempts at constructing disingenuous gotchas. Now she, along with a lot of her colleagues, is using destruction and death as an aid to her ambitions. How can anyone want people prepared to do that in charge of their country?

There is also the minor detail that she is not on the ticket through her own ability to appeal to the electorate, she is there because her benefactor Pelosi wants her there to take over the presidency when they 25th amendment Biden. She failed dismally as a politician on the national stage, yet here she is. Pelosi wants to use Trump-phobia to shoehorn a candidate rejected by even her own party into the Whitehouse.

Obama Vs. Bush / 'who is worse?' Is moot... now that the worst elements of both have united against Trump.

When I hear man-on-the-street opinions against trump... Not sjws-- just normal folks... They seem to be in support of some mildly left status quo... Which DOES NOT Exist in the U.S. Af if the U.S. Simply defaults to being Canada or New zealand... If you replace Trump with Hillary & Cheney's cronies.

That's as delusional as the expectation that Iraq would become Oklahoma, after Saddam.
Or... Afghanistan would become Hawaii !

Trump's not-very-visionary vision of America is at-least based on trying to maintain or restore things which previously ran well.

The Dem's vision is a utopian wish list with a wishful-thinking methodology. It's like trying to defeat cancer by giving children free cigarettes. Or preparing for a huricane by banning the word huricane.

I was resigned to Hillary as inevitable in 2016. Now it looks like trump was a brief postponement of the same inevitable regime.

Keating wrote: ↑ I thought you were a kiwi, not a bin chicken

You know us kiwis. Eats roots and leaves.

Brive1987 wrote: ↑ I’m having involuntary, pornographic, soul destroying flashes featuring Berejiklian.

This must stop.

You've just doxxed yourself Daryl.

And just in case you Yanks missed the in-joke, this is the Premier of NSW who has Brive so hot and flustered (after being triggered by Keating).

https://i.redd.it/5tnd1pdjmu511.jpg

Thank GOD!

Finally Barbie can shit on white people. Current Year...

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑

screwtape wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 11, 2020 3:52 am

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ I mean, debate, singular. Dems will find an excuse to cancel the rest.

Half right is better than all wrong. :D I was surprised that Biden managed to appear, simulate, or actually be quite functional. It makes me pretty sure all that obvious facial immobility was Botox.
I read your scary post on Harris. It appears she is more of a traditional politician; scheming, conniving and power-hungry. Gimmicks like identity politics can get you elected, but you don't succeed and get re-elected unless you make life better for the average voter. To go OTT, one imagines a crazy pol being elected on a platform of reparations for all oppressed minorities, but the consequences would mean no second term. Successful politicians are willing to do what the majority of voters want in order to stay in power. Trump got that bit right for a start, but has failed to change in response to the public's mood changing; instead he has stuck with the same script and it doesn't look like it will fly a second time.

I think Trump is badly misunderstood. The common narrative is that he is a pandering populist. I disagree. I think he understands that the US has been operating on a model created at the end of WWII to maintain stability at some economic cost. The cost to the blue collar worker is no longer justified by current circumstances and he is prepared to negotiate a new relationship with the World. He has a strategic plan and he has managed to implement it to some extent. He approaches issues without the old assumptions. His electability depends on how well voters understand what he is doing.

In the normal course of things one would think that Harris would wear out her welcome very quickly, however that might depend on the Democrats capacity to spread misinformation about the alternatives, their willingness to import voters and to monkey with the electoral system.

Whereas I suspect that Trump's NWO plan starts and ends at TrumpWorld Fun Park.

John D wrote: ↑ Thank GOD!

Finally Barbie can shit on white people. Current Year...

For Sale

Barbie's Dream House Nigger

The must-have accessory of 2020

Loot one from the Target store on MLK Boulevard.

(Why isn't she Lizzo backfat size?)

Haha... oh shit. I am gonna get in trouble but I don't care. I posted the Barbie video on my Facebook feed and wrote "Thanks Nikki for sharing this with us today."

Haha... and I can't stop laughing.

Something is really wrong with the world right now.... and there is something wrong with me. I fucking laugh at EVERYTHING.

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑

screwtape wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:28 pm

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ I fear a Harris presidency will result in a totalitarian, one-party state.

With all respect to you, Matt, which party is it that is suggesting that the result of the election must be fought as ineligible?

Oddly enough, I probably have a lot more in common with you than with an enthusiast for President Harris. She's not my thing, and nor was Hillary. I'm willing to pinch my nose and vote for the lesser evil up here, where nobody is particularly good at either evil or saintliness. I think I may have said before that the function of a good swing voter is not to vote for what you want, it is to vote out that which has failed.

Anonymous voting in person at a secure election station is the time-honoured way for good reason. Trump is trying to keep it that way and the Dems are planning on getting tens of millions of ballots sent through the mail. The normal checks and balances applied in absentee voting will not apply, creating opportunities for coercion and a host of ways of voting fraudulently. Arranging safe in person polling is not rocket science. Hand sanitiser at the door, spacing in the queue and even disinfection of pencils or keyboards (or whatever is used) between votes and you are set. Perhaps even hold a 2 day election to minimise crowding. Why are the Democrats so set against it? Why do they insist on enabling fraud? The logistics are a nightmare and there is certain to be a long and fractious wait for the result. They've gathered their lawyers and are singing their "Trump the Dictator" song again. Based on their recent behaviour I would say that they are priming their base to revolt if Trump doesn't submit to a loss with widespread irregularities and/or want to create chaos and uncertainty if they look to have lost. I can't be sure of the motives, but one party wants a securer vote, the other doesn't.

Except for Florida. Remember that. Vote by mail is just fine in Florida. Also, Trump votes by mail in Florida.

I think hand-marked ballots, counted by hand in public is the gold standard for an election. Anything else leaves room for fraud, or hanging chads.

KiwiInOz wrote: ↑ And just in case you Yanks missed the in-joke, this is the Premier of NSW who has Brive so hot and flustered (after being triggered by Keating).

https://i.redd.it/5tnd1pdjmu511.jpg

OK. Matt needs an intervention. Preferably with lots of ice cold water and some bromide.

KiwiInOz wrote: ↑ And just in case you Yanks missed the in-joke, this is the Premier of NSW who has Brive so hot and flustered (after being triggered by Keating).

https://i.redd.it/5tnd1pdjmu511.jpg

The world was sane when I thought she had remained mercifully unmarried out of charitable regard for mankind.

2020 🤷‍♂️🤢🤮

Instructions on how to disrupt society if Trump wins the election:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WtD ... -dc-people

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Instructions on how to disrupt society if Trump wins the election:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WtD ... -dc-people

I don't see there where it talks about collecting your spoons first?

sometimes Phetasy is funny...

Joe Biden tests your memory...

Fifty-ssssssixxxx

WTF???

Big news folks:

Has anyone mentioned Nazi's recently?

Judge Sullivan-- in the Flynn case-- is now tied to the Hillary email deletion conspiracy.

Lsuoma wrote: ↑

Hunt wrote: ↑ Normally I don't go for quickie youtube science vids because you learn just enough to be utterly useless, but this one is so bizarre that I do. And it also answers a long term question I've always had but didn't realize. I flip a tennis racket now and then and always wondered why the damn things want to invert when I do.

IIRC, a body will rotate stably around only two of the equivalent parallelepiped's orthogonal axes, namely the longest and shortest. I don't know or remember what happens when two or all three are equivalent. It's easy to see by playing with an Amazon box (no, I'm not talking about Steffi Graf's cunt).

That's my amateur understanding. It's rotation about the axis with intermediate angular moment of inertia that is unstable (hence the name). I think if two moments are the same, all rotations are stable (but don't quote me). If all three are identical (e.g. a sphere), I'm assuming all rotations are stable, since due to symmetry there is only one way to rotate it, the obvious way to rotate a sphere. I think basketball sport would have discovered otherwise by now.

Leaked emails show Biden lied, met with son's corrupt Ukranian company-- in meeting arranged by Hunter Biden

“The computer was dropped off at a repair shop in Biden’s home state of Delaware in April 2019, according to the store’s owner,” the Post reports.

Also on the laptop is a “raunchy, 12-minute video that appears to show Hunter, who’s admitted struggling with addiction problems, smoking crack while engaged in a sex act with an unidentified woman, as well as numerous other sexually explicit images.”

The repair shop owner could not confirm the laptop owner was Hunter Biden, but there was a sticker on the laptop from the Beau Biden Foundation. Along with he video are documents and photos that sure make it look like this was Hunter’s laptop.

The FBI seized the laptop in December, but not before the repair shop owner made a copy of the hard drive. He then gave the cop to former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s lawyer, Robert Costello.

Just this week we learned that Joe Biden’s son-in-law Howard Krein is chief medical officer for a firm called StartUp Health, an investment firm looking to invest in products to deal with the coronavirus pandemic. At the same time, Krein is advising the Biden campaign on the coronavirus, a stunning conflict of interest, so stunning the far-left Politico reported on it.

Team Joe called another 'lid' this morning.

As I'm sure you'd expect, the Hunter Biden memes are pretty funny.

https://media.thedonald.win/post/cn6nAo3x.jpeg

Truly, science is a thing of beauty!

"Have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors?"

for the record, yes, i have been turned down

- The Vice President of the United States flies to China to negotiate a trade deal.
- Brings his son along on Air Force Two.
- Son gets a $1.5 billion investment in his business from the Chinese government.
- Chinese government gets a favorable trade deal.

That's been ignored by the MSM all along, even though the former VP is now running for president.

Now we learn:
- Vice President got a 10% cut of the investment.

And that news is being censored.

Debate moderator admits he lied about his twitter being hacked.

as in 2016, the debates are revealed to be fixed in Dems' favor

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ - The Vice President of the United States flies to China to negotiate a trade deal.
- Brings his son along on Air Force Two.
- Son gets a $1.5 billion investment in his business from the Chinese government.
- Chinese government gets a favorable trade deal.

That's been ignored by the MSM all along, even though the former VP is now running for president.

Now we learn:
- Vice President got a 10% cut of the investment.

And that news is being censored.

Come now. There are plenty of journalistic outlets that have strong standards. A local newswoman was fired for "violating her contract" by filming a cameo in an Adam Sandler movie.

https://decider.com/2020/10/15/hubie-ha ... ina-pinto/

See? They police their own. They're heroes.

So I tried to RT and got this response:

"Twitter is over capacity. Please wait a few moments then try again."

Here is the tweet:

I'm thinking that it's probably time for another revolution in the USA.

Trump didn't drain the swamp, he just changed the plants around the edge for his own.