So anyone who disagrees is sexist. They use this kind of dismissive attitude of non-engagement and still wonder why people have problems with them.I know that this article will only rile up the sexist skeptics.
I’ll hear about how I’m a slut who deserves whatever I get,
There would be people who would say that and they are assholes. These kind of disagreements are no excuse to say those things.
Nope. Just someone presented half of the truth and the part more charitable parts to her narrative. You moulded the narrative to subtly make an uninformed reader to get to *your* conclusion without presenting the relevant information. You know, just like the way AWG deniers, Homeopaths, and other people work.about how I’m a liar who made everything up,
about how I’ve overreacted,
Sometimes yes sometimes no. But what's the big deal? Everyone overreacts to somethings, sometimes. It's not a crime. It's human nature. And sometimes people will think you overreacted and they are wrong. The problem is when you accuse those who disagree with you of being sexist assholes who "gas light women" or of being "victim blamer" or "rape enabler". That's just nasty and stupid.
and about how I should just ignore the trolls and they’ll go away.
Okay. Repeat after me: trolls will never go away.
So the lessons that we learn from studying science are for others. Just like how while we know that human memory is fragile and some people might misremember the details of an incident years after, we can ignore this and take the word of eye-witnesses through second hand sources are truth and accuse anyone who doubts that or anyone who asks for evidence of being a "rape enabler". Afterall, that's skepticm at the highest level!I’ve written this article anyway, because I strongly believe that the goals of skeptics are good ones, like strengthening science education, protecting consumers, and deepening our knowledge of human psychology.
I agree with the latter 100%!Those goals will never be met if we continue to fester as a middling subculture that not only ignores social issues but is actively antagonistic toward progressive thought.