I've been wondering why the A-plussers irritate me so grievously. On paper I agree with almost all of their stated aims; secular humanism being, by and large, a Good Thing.
In particular why should that bloodless screed by HaifischGeweint provoke me to comment at FtB?
It wasn't until I read a piece by the irrepressible (and occasionally tiresome) Ian Murphy over on Buffalo Beast delicately titled
BREAKING: Men want to fuck teenage girls that the bulb lit up. I happened upon this trenchant insight:
. . . words mean what they mean, and even the righteous need to use them properly. Otherwise, it undermines and confuses one’s argument.
To give it some context Murphy is referring to the unmasking of the RL identity of some ghastly Reddit Troll by a Gawker typist who goes by the name of Adrian Chen. It carries some uncanny parallels with all this A+ weenies versus the MRA meatheads malarkey and is worth the read. I'd link but Chromium keeps shrieking about the site being a malware operation or somesuch. In any case I've no doubt at least one of you malcontents can manage to crank up the Google machine.
But I think this is it. It's not that A-plussers are wrong in their broad thrust, it's that they're shrill and annoying in the way they go about it and this undermines their lofty goals. They come across as self entitled, professionally undergraduate and weak.
As a fag I find this quality in my own kind to be unacceptable. They need to harden up.
Incidentally the word-salad "LGBT" has been around for years. The "Q" and the "I" were added later. I'm not sure when I must have missed that meeting of the HomIntern. The "Q" I'm not so keen on but the "I" is fine. Intersex folks do have it hard and should be given the benefit of the doubt. Whilst some of the genderqueer and trans activists can be painful dolts, more than one of their critics in this place sound like candidate members of the Aryan Brotherhood. :naughty:
Other than that keep up the good work chaps! :mrgreen:
Bisous,
'tinkle