Periodic Table of Swearing

TFJ · #28381

Tuvok, did you have to invoke the name of that smug stream of diarrhea? It's manifested itself again.

If anyone's had the dubious pleasure of getting into a spat with an obnoxious child on public transport they'll get that same sense dealing with this brat. I might have to start logging in again just so I can flush this nut. An obvious troll, but not entirely uninvested either. There's limited comprehension in this one.

#28382

sacha wrote: I start something, and can't let it sit there and go to bed. I have to finish what I started, and make sure there is nothing potentially dangerous left on the floor for the dogs to accidentally step on.

<snip>

I'm not complaining. I am actually astounded at how much I can lift, and how strong I am when I am ripping up something like a subfloor. I think I'm I like to get things sorted. The pain is well worth having my clean, airy, uncluttered home.

I have plenty of time at night to work, so the sleep deprivation has been rather common lately.

I did not sleep well as a child, and that has not changed well into middle age. I can remember being wide awake (and BORED) throughout the entire obligatory nap time in Montessori kindergarten. Maybe this will all change when I'm really old, and I'll be able to take naps and sleep for more than four hours straight. Then again, maybe not - melatonin levels decline with advanced age.

I'm the same, with regards to finishing projects and working on the house or yard. Getting ready to go out of town for a few days, and I can't stand leaving with the house or yard a mess. Now that the little dogs have been dropped off at the vet's for boarding, I'm giving the floors a thorough cleaning.

#28383

It doesn't help to add oolon to the Ignore list if everyone is just going to fucking quote his every post.

#28384

TFJ wrote:Tuvok, did you have to invoke the name of that smug stream of diarrhea? It's manifested itself again.

If anyone's had the dubious pleasure of getting into a spat with an obnoxious child on public transport they'll get that same sense dealing with this brat. I might have to start logging in again just so I can flush this nut. An obvious troll, but not entirely uninvested either. There's limited comprehension in this one.

I can't help it - I enjoy pulling his chain. Further, it really pisses the Baboons off that he keeps on coming over here.

Anyway, did anybody get the impression that when the Slimy One said he should have screencapped it, it was for his own entertainment!

:naughty:

#28385

cunt wrote:Looks like atheism+ are starting a wiki. http://atheismplus.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page

Nothing really there at the moment. Though, they've had to edit the main page to get the link to it on there. Its now really basic html. Just a hunch, but I don't think Jen McReight ever even trusted one of them with the wordpress password.

Why? They already have RationalWiki.

#28386

TFJ wrote:Tuvok, did you have to invoke the name of that smug stream of diarrhea? It's manifested itself again.

If anyone's had the dubious pleasure of getting into a spat with an obnoxious child on public transport they'll get that same sense dealing with this brat. I might have to start logging in again just so I can flush this nut. An obvious troll, but not entirely uninvested either. There's limited comprehension in this one.

Fuck me, not only paedos on here but child beaters as well! I guess keyboard jockeys have got to get their thrills somewhere... But beating up little kids on buses? Jebus how can you live with yourself. :o Seems PZ was right there is no worse den of vile despicable humanity anywhere on the web.

I'm out, never to return... TFJ has shocked me to my core. I think I may have to crawl into a corner and weep for the little children damaged by the evil pitters.

#28387

OOLON SAID THIS PART (THE BITS NOT WITHIN OTHER QUOTES) BECAUSE THREE LEVELS OF QUOTE IS TOO FUCKING SHALLOW

welch wrote:
oolon, slimy turd wrote:
welch wrote: Simply and clearly: what action does FTB/A+ have to take against "enemies" before you're willing to say "that's wrong", no excuses, no justifications.

You can just type words here, I'm not blocking you. You're a great personification of the phrase "Unctuous Tit" to do that.
Execution by ice pick... But seriously anything verbal must surely come under the Slyme-provision for anyone without thick skin having no right to be on the internet? Embrace victimhood John!
as you've embraced vacuous douchery? I think I shall abstain for now.

oolon, slimy turd wrote:I suppose if anyone actually released someone's home address (Not IP address!) and posted it on a hate site as an encouragement to take action then I'd probably have an issue with that...
Ah. So stalking is okay, threatening someone is okay, but putting someone's home address on stormfront, that's bad?

Funny, I'd have thought you'd have said assault, battery, you know physically attacking people. It's telling you went for the slacktivist answer.

Not surprising mind you, but telling. Or at least interesting.

So that is oolon's line. Not physical violence, not direct threats, not stalking. No, his line is putting someone's home address on a "hate" site, and encouraging people to "take action". THAT is bad.

Do you mean cyber-stalk? Or has someone been seen hanging around on street corners looking suspicious? Its probably just franc on the lookout for his next Hoggling transaction. END OF WHAT OOLON SAID

Oh look at you, trying once again to make this about Hoggle. You spend a lot of time talking about him. Someone's got a crush. Oolon & hoggle sittin' in a tree... (sorry franc, the bleach goes easier on the brain after the first rush of pain)

oolon, slimy turd wrote: If you do mean cyber-stalk then how much criticism have you sent ElevatorGates way? Or francs way for that matter... I've not seen anything like that level of cyber-weirdo-ness from any FtB blogger but maybe you know better... I obviously do not approve of that!

Oh we already have the answer to that: laden stalking Abbie so he could get enough info to try to get her boss to silence her. Let's be clear here: that was stalking, and yet time and time again, you defend it, because Laden said it wasn't stalking. Welp sport, hate to tell you, but yeah, that was stalking. So once again, the evidence, she is not your friend. Also, you seem to be really willing to defend damned near anything Laden does. Funny that.

oolon, slimy turd wrote: "Not physical assault">>> Are you trolling me now John? I said ice pick execution, the 'but seriously' was an admission that it is ridiculous to imagine the 'FC5' would engage in any physical violence? FC does stand for Fainting Couch... No? PZ has been face to face with the slimy motherfucker Sye Bruggencate, I think his animus towards him is at least as equal as that towards anyone on the pit and at no point did he look like taking a pot shot.

Nope. I'm just pointing out the things you said. I left the question open-ended so that you had room to provide a reasonably complete answer, not just thumbs-up/thumbs-down. You had all of the language with which to make your reply. Don't cry now that you chose poorly. As well, the "execution by ice pick" is just poorly done. Of course, the idea behind it is that I would jump on it and say WHAT ABOUT EXECUTION WITH A STRAWBERRY! WHAT ABOUT THAT! ARE YOU OKAY WITH THAT! IS IT JUST ICE PICKS THAT ARE BAD?

Sorry sonny, but really, overly-specific hyperbole designed to derail requires the listener not already think that's your sum total interest here. Since I don't trust you as far as I can throw a car, well, you're kind of screwed there.

oolon, slimy turd wrote: But if we are considering the ridiculous then yeah obviously physical violence - I was against Greg for even an intimation of physical violence in my link above but somehow that is not 'relevant'... Are you sure I'm not being trolled ;-)

Funny how long it took you to say that. Hell, I asked the question some time ago. All you had to say was "Yeah. Direct threats of violence are bad. Physical attacks on any level are bad. Actual stalking, (not just replying on a fucking blog) is bad."

See? Quite easy when you try. That's all i really wanted, and yet, your'e so devoted to being what, the Anti-Hoggle(?) that you couldn't just directly answer the question without the bad derail attempts.

On the weird obsession you have with commenting on every blog you can: Son, kissing the ass of people to whom you are naught but a tool to be used and discarded is no way to go through life. You may wish to ponder why the approval of FTB, and specifically, Greg Laden is so important to you.

#28388

John Greg wrote:Orlan said:

I've read the whole [Laden's book] myself. Did you fuckwits work out it is about you?
About us? You have got to be kidding.

If it is, I feel pretty.

#28389

franc wrote:
Why? They already have RationalWiki.

But it's not RationalWiki+ is it...

#28390

oolon, slimy turd wrote:
John Greg wrote:Orlan said:

I've read the whole [Laden's book] myself. Did you fuckwits work out it is about you?
About us? You have got to be kidding.
I would post some of the text since you are too cheap to pony up the Â£3.20 on amazon, but since you'd all go whining to Greg about copyright infringement I'll just have to lend anyone my kindle over a beer at the local pub here.

Personally, I'd rather hang out with Jen's Wanking Hobo. He at least has an interesting way of passing the time.

#28391

CommanderTuvok wrote:
TFJ wrote:Tuvok, did you have to invoke the name of that smug stream of diarrhea? It's manifested itself again.

If anyone's had the dubious pleasure of getting into a spat with an obnoxious child on public transport they'll get that same sense dealing with this brat. I might have to start logging in again just so I can flush this nut. An obvious troll, but not entirely uninvested either. There's limited comprehension in this one.
I can't help it - I enjoy pulling his chain. Further, it really pisses the Baboons off that he keeps on coming over here.

Anyway, did anybody get the impression that when the Slimy One said he should have screencapped it, it was for his own entertainment!

:naughty:

I said I did screencap it... Anyway... Definitely off now.. Never to return etc... TFJ is really scaring me with his old man who likes to beat kids vibe.

TFJ · #28392

This Christmas Pooh engagement has now descended to level of "Did", "Didn't", "Did", "Didn't", "Did too!" and "Your mother wears army boots". You could bitchslap this guy around from here until the end of the century and his stupid grin would just get bigger. You know what they say about wrestling pigs.

#28393

Oolon. Proclaims himself an expert and arbiter of quality trolling.

Writes a flattering puff for Greg Laden's book.

http://oyster.ignimgs.com/social/avatar ... 560338.jpg

Says it takes a special* kind of genius to get banned from PZs blog while sucking up to him.

http://forums.ebay.com/servlet/JiveServ ... 1606/z.jpg

* ;)

#28394

I don't know which is more embarassing, the primary school level of trolling or the fact that it seems to be working.

#28395

welch wrote: Oh we already have the answer to that: laden stalking Abbie so he could get enough info to try to get her boss to silence her. Let's be clear here: that was stalking, and yet time and time again, you defend it, because Laden said it wasn't stalking. Welp sport, hate to tell you, but yeah, that was stalking. So once again, the evidence, she is not your friend. Also, you seem to be really willing to defend damned near anything Laden does. Funny that.

One letter... Is stalking... BUT one whole blog and ElevatorGates 6,148 tweets to anyone vaguely associated with Rebecca is fair comment. Wow, new low in Slyme apologetics. You should take up limbo, I see a great future for you there.

[oolons not really here, this is oolons... errr... friend commenting for him, he says TFJ said he has pretty eyes and now he is scared to get on the bus... PS Why do I get the feeling this is the most attention TFJ has ever got?]

#28396

@Bhoytony

I'm just enjoying him while he's still around to be enjoyed.

#28397

bhoytony wrote:I don't know which is more embarassing, the primary school level of trolling or the fact that it seems to be working.

That's why I warned Crommunist off, taking the piss here is addictive.. Seems he has more sense than me though.

#28398

http://capslol.com/wp-content/uploads/2 ... olling.jpg

#28399

CommanderTuvok wrote:
oolon, slimy turd wrote:Hmm Kiddie porn on the pit, I'm surprised and shocked! So surprised and shocked I almost forgot to screencap it... My next blog post... "The Slymepit is Full of Paedos" :whistle:
I've seen far worse on FreeThoughtBlogs.

Yeah. A+ forum from a while back -

Re: Effects of not having privilege(Trigger Warning: Oppress

Postby skepticallyinclined Â» Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:06 am

Because I am a pedophile, I must constantly fear exposure
Because I am a pedophile, it is assumed I am a dangerous sex offender
Because I am a pedophile, I must worry about job security (exposure would lead to loss of employment as a non-legally protected group)
Because I am pedophile, I cannot seek help for my mental illness because of fear of exposure

Because I am subject to severe social anxiety, I am told I just need to get out more (being lectured about this by someone i barely knew at a dinner it took everything I could muster to attend, was probably the worst thing I've ever experienced in my adult life).

Not one board member batted an eye lid. You see, all the oppression and victim boxes had been ticked.

#28400

oolon, slimy turd wrote: Fuck me not only paedos on here but child beaters as well! I guess keyboard jockeys have got to get their thrills somewhere... But beating up little kids on buses? Jebus how can you live with yourself. :o Seems PZ was right there is no worse den of vile despicable humanity anywhere on the web.

I'm out, never to return... TFJ has shocked me to my core. I think I may have to crawl into a corner and weep for the little children ~~damaged by the evil pitters.~~

Asking little children to fuck you Oolon? Are there no depths to your depravity? No depths I ask!

#28401

Did Oolon say he screencapped possible child porn? Isn't that technically downloading it?

Dirty bastard.

#28402

Though saying that, I'd think it would be a hoot to ban him from here, for no other reason than to see him scurrying back to PZ: 'the slymepit banned meeee - can I come back in now, please?'

#28403

http://i.imgur.com/LWGNa.jpg

How does Amy know? Did she send someone to visit? Did she 'doc drop?'

#28404

@Parsehole

He is a bit fucking thick, isn't he. He's even admitted to it here, in writing. :lol:

Guessed · #28405

oolon, slimy turd wrote:
welch wrote: Oh we already have the answer to that: laden stalking Abbie so he could get enough info to try to get her boss to silence her. Let's be clear here: that was stalking, and yet time and time again, you defend it, because Laden said it wasn't stalking. Welp sport, hate to tell you, but yeah, that was stalking. So once again, the evidence, she is not your friend. Also, you seem to be really willing to defend damned near anything Laden does. Funny that.
One letter... Is stalking... BUT one whole blog and ElevatorGates 6,148 tweets to anyone vaguely associated with Rebecca is fair comment. Wow, new low in Slyme apologetics. You should take up limbo, I see a great future for you there.

[oolons not really here, this is oolons... errr... friend commenting for him, he says TFJ said he has pretty eyes and now he is scared to get on the bus... PS Why do I get the feeling this is the most attention TFJ has ever got?]

Actively seeking out information about someone's professional life so they can interfere to seemingly get them reprimanded, just because this individual disagrees with their opinion and conduct = invasive behaviour (I wouldn't call it stalking, though it's a thoroughly reprehensible 'tactic' and shows Laden to be quite devoid of integrity imo).

Tweeting continuously about a fairly public figure = non-invasive.

No?

#28406

Now I will admit I like oolon. I really do. he's just a troll getting his lulz. I can relate to that.
But when a relatively new, anonymous member on a forum posts possible child pornography and your first instinct is not to say "wtf?" and report it to a mod but to SAVE IT TO YOUR HARD DRIVE then alarm bells doth ring. Admitting you did it is just....."WTF?"

I wonder what his partner will say when she finds his file of "research"?

#28407

jimthepleb wrote: A+ will gain no more traction in the 'community' they are already a spent force. The few people who aren't aware of their agenda, will do what i hope most people would do. i.e. initially agree that social justice is a nice idea, wonder how it relates to the sceptical community, raise eyebrows at the idea of conjoining atheism and social justice, read some FfTB blogs and comments, laugh their fucking arses off and tell A+ to stick a porcupine unlubed in its festering rancid cunt....

Right, because the question isn't whether skepticism relates to "social justice". If course it does. Racist claims, books like The Bell Curve and info churned out by atroturf organizations and pay-for-policy mills should be given the great skeptical reaming.

But whatever applying skepticism is, these fucking stuck-at-the-keyboard con artists aren't doing it. Their dumb, mean-spirited authoritarian ways are not only an offense against the atheist and skeptical community, but actual progressive liberalism and they all should pull their heads out of each others lazy, self-indulgent asses.

Guessed · #28408

Tony Parsehole wrote:
oolon, slimy turd wrote: Fuck me not only paedos on here but child beaters as well! I guess keyboard jockeys have got to get their thrills somewhere... But beating up little kids on buses? Jebus how can you live with yourself. :o Seems PZ was right there is no worse den of vile despicable humanity anywhere on the web.

I'm out, never to return... TFJ has shocked me to my core. I think I may have to crawl into a corner and weep for the little children ~~damaged by the evil pitters.~~
Asking little children to fuck you Oolon? Are there no depths to your depravity? No depths I ask!

Hahaha

#28409

bhoytony wrote:http://capslol.com/wp-content/uploads/2 ... olling.jpg

More instruction on trolling in this video:
[youtube]cykf0Ijyags[/youtube]

#28410

@Parsehole

Trust me mate, his partner is the least of his worries. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Oolon: comes into slymepit. 'PZ is kewl, he won't ban me for being here.' PZ bans Oolon from Pharyngula.
Oolon: name gets doc-dropped. Compounds it by revealing the quaint village in which he lives and the pub he drinks at.
Oolon: gets involved in a possibly libellous, even criminal, matter on twitter. 'Ha ha lulz'.
Oolon: downloads possible kiddie porn. Admits it here.

Oolon: 'You guyz are so eazy to troll, lol lol!'

Naysayers - can you not see why others find him so funny (in all senses of the word?)

#28411

@ Tigzy. HAHAHAHAHA! It's been said before and it will be said again:
He's the gift that keeps giving.

Oh look. I think I found oolon's troll face:
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/arc ... 80316b.jpg

#28412

CommanderTuvok wrote:
TFJ wrote:Tuvok, did you have to invoke the name of that smug stream of diarrhea? It's manifested itself again.

If anyone's had the dubious pleasure of getting into a spat with an obnoxious child on public transport they'll get that same sense dealing with this brat. I might have to start logging in again just so I can flush this nut. An obvious troll, but not entirely uninvested either. There's limited comprehension in this one.
I can't help it - I enjoy pulling his chain. Further, it really pisses the Baboons off that he keeps on coming over here.

Anyway, did anybody get the impression that when the Slimy One said he should have screencapped it, it was for his own entertainment!

:naughty:

I get the feeling that there is some mutual chain pulling going on. Perhaps you two could/should get a room?

#28413

Oh, I see Mabus has been arrested again.

Damn, just as Operation Archangel was about to make some serious waves by attaining 5 followers on twitter.

#28414

Tigzy wrote:Oh, I see Mabus has been arrested again.

Damn, just as Operation Archangel was about to make some serious waves by attaining 5 followers on twitter.

All of which had the same I.P. address as OperationArchangel.....

#28415

You know, you'd have thought that Nostradamus would have foreseen Dave's troubles, and at least helped him out with a few prophecies in this regard, wouldn't you?

#28416

Tigzy wrote: Naysayers - can you not see why others find him so funny (in all senses of the word?)

honestly? no

#28417

mutleyeng wrote:
Tigzy wrote: Naysayers - can you not see why others find him so funny (in all senses of the word?)
honestly? no

Considering that oolon always goes away from here with his reputation even more in tatters than it was I think he's welcome to post as much as he wants. One day he's giving out his name and location the next he's admitting to downloading child porn. Good for him.

That said I can see why some find him so risible. But at least Lusoma likes him enough to give him his very own smiley:

:hankey:

#28418

mutleyeng wrote:
Tigzy wrote: Naysayers - can you not see why others find him so funny (in all senses of the word?)
honestly? no

Nope, sick of seeing his name and faux-cheerful posts all over the cunting place.

#28419

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
mutleyeng wrote:
Tigzy wrote: Naysayers - can you not see why others find him so funny (in all senses of the word?)
honestly? no
Nope, sick of seeing his name and faux-cheerful posts all over the cunting place.

Faux cheerful is faux. I love the seething rage that becomes more apparent in each consecutive post. The more smilies he uses the angrier he's getting.

I bet after oolon's had a session on the Pit his wife ends up with open-toed-sandal marks all over her midriff.

#28420

Trouble is, I keep telling myself that I should ignore him, but I can't resist seeing how much further he'll drop himself in it. It's fucking hilarious. I admit, I thought a nadir had been reached when he got banned from Pharyngula, but now admitting to screencapping possible kiddie porn - I honestly don't think he can top that one.

#28421

Tony Parsehole wrote:
mutleyeng wrote:
Tigzy wrote: Naysayers - can you not see why others find him so funny (in all senses of the word?)
honestly? no
Considering that oolon always goes away from here with his reputation even more in tatters than it was I think he's welcome to post as much as he wants. One day he's giving out his name and location the next he's admitting to downloading child porn. Good for him.

Maybe we should pass the hat around and buy him a NAMBLA membership.

#28422

franc wrote:
CommanderTuvok wrote:
oolon, slimy turd wrote:Hmm Kiddie porn on the pit, I'm surprised and shocked! So surprised and shocked I almost forgot to screencap it... My next blog post... "The Slymepit is Full of Paedos" :whistle:
I've seen far worse on FreeThoughtBlogs.

Did anyone else notice that the only other person who made "Hoggle-centric" insults besides Oolon was SYG?

SYG:

Yes, I learned that from experience. Sacha, have you ever had sex? Or do you just cyber-suck hogglecock?

And now Oolon pops in to assure us he did screencap the "kiddie porn" posted by SYG to use in a blogpost?

Uh huh...

P.S. Oolon, People might tell you it's never too late to use an anonymous domain registration service for your blog. They would be incorrect.

#28423

franc wrote:
Maybe we should pass the hat around and buy him a NAMBLA membership.

Implying he's not already a member.

Great blogpost BTW. Shit ton of work in that mate.

#28424

Tony Parsehole wrote: Oh look. I think I found oolon's troll face:
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/arc ... 80316b.jpg

Normally I'd take the image out, but I'm leaving it in for this one:

I don't know why everyone has it in for Jimmy Saville'.

#28425

Tigzy wrote:I thought a nadir had been reached when he got banned from Pharyngula, but now admitting to screencapping possible kiddie porn - I honestly don't think he can top that one.

Cue hilarious, faux-cheerful (thanks OM ) oolon reply explaining why it's ok to download child porn in some circumstances in 3...2...1..

#28426

Lsuoma wrote: Normally I'd take the image out, but I'm leaving it in for this one:

I don't know why everyone has it in for Jimmy Saville'.

Fucking. Epic.
I cannot believe they let that through.

#28427

@Parsehole

Seriously, if Oolon had the slightest bit of sense, he'd leave well alone now, as it must be plainly obvious he's only ever digging himself deeper. Course, he won't - he'll see these posts, and he will just not be able to resist coming back to let us know how much he is, in actuallity, 'winning'.

#28428

Funny thing is, lots of people from FfTB, A+ and Skepchick keep an eye on this site. They will have seen Oloon sully himself.

#28429

Check your privilege Tuvok.
Going off evidence from A+ own site the most oolon will get is some hastily typed e-mails asking him to share his screencap.

#28430

CommanderTuvok wrote:They will have seen Oloon sully himself.

For some reason, I get this image of Jesus shitting in his own sandals.

#28431

justinvacula wrote:How does Amy know? Did she send someone to visit? Did she 'doc drop?'

The guy (I imagine a close associate of Scurvy Amy, or someone fully committed to FfTB, A+, Skepchick, etc.) who created that Homer-Vacula account must be feeling pretty stoopid. Not only did he make a horrible mistake, he exposed the fact that Amy doc-dropped, and was quite happy to doc-drop. At the same time she was complaining about Justin "doc-dropping" her, when he did no such thing, of course.

It beggars belief.

#28432

Tony Parsehole wrote:
Lsuoma wrote: Normally I'd take the image out, but I'm leaving it in for this one:

I don't know why everyone has it in for Jimmy Saville'.
Fucking. Epic.
I cannot believe they let that through.

I guessed that of all the Pitters, you'd appreciate that possibly the most...

#28433

Completely a propos of nothing, I LOLed when I saw this:
Nudity Ban Eyed in San Francisco

"I don't think having some guys taking their clothes off and hanging out seven days a week at Castro and Market Street is really what San Francisco is about," district supervisor Scott Wiener said. "I think it's a caricature of what San Francisco is about."

#28434

Lsuoma wrote:Completely a propos of nothing, I LOLed when I saw this:
Nudity Ban Eyed in San Francisco

"I don't think having some guys taking their clothes off and hanging out seven days a week at Castro and Market Street is really what San Francisco is about," district supervisor Scott Wiener said. "I think it's a caricature of what San Francisco is about."

Eh, wait for the weather to cool and those guys will pack up the old dangle.

#28435

Lsuoma wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
Lsuoma wrote: Normally I'd take the image out, but I'm leaving it in for this one:

I don't know why everyone has it in for Jimmy Saville'.
Fucking. Epic.
I cannot believe they let that through.
I guessed that of all the Pitters, you'd appreciate that possibly the most...

Awww bless your lil' heart.

I just hope all the pitters know who Jimmy Saville is.*

*And if they don't it's worth a google.

#28436

Mykeru wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:Completely a propos of nothing, I LOLed when I saw this:
Nudity Ban Eyed in San Francisco

"I don't think having some guys taking their clothes off and hanging out seven days a week at Castro and Market Street is really what San Francisco is about," district supervisor Scott Wiener said. "I think it's a caricature of what San Francisco is about."
Eh, wait for the weather to cool and those guys will pack up the old dangle.

Normally I'd say "April fools" but...Y'know...

#28437

Found some more depraved pro-terrorist MRA hate speech:

[youtube]QAYZYMOyopw[/youtube]

#28438

Tony Parsehole wrote:I don't ask anything during sex and neither does my partner. I cannot imagine the scenario of:

"May I kiss your navel?"
"Yes"
"May I suck your nipple?"
"Not tonight"
"Pokey bum frig?"
"Go on but I haven't had a shit in three days"

YMMV

Ha ha, I'm pissing myself.
:hankey:

#28439

oolon, slimy turd wrote:
welch wrote: Oh we already have the answer to that: laden stalking Abbie so he could get enough info to try to get her boss to silence her. Let's be clear here: that was stalking, and yet time and time again, you defend it, because Laden said it wasn't stalking. Welp sport, hate to tell you, but yeah, that was stalking. So once again, the evidence, she is not your friend. Also, you seem to be really willing to defend damned near anything Laden does. Funny that.
One letter... Is stalking... BUT one whole blog and ElevatorGates 6,148 tweets to anyone vaguely associated with Rebecca is fair comment. Wow, new low in Slyme apologetics. You should take up limbo, I see a great future for you there.

Spin, magic wheel of bullshit, spin!

Honky please...messages on twitter are not even vaguely close to what laden did, esp. given the ease of ignoring people on twitter. Still trying to get back into his good graces via his rectum i see. Man, you just gotta suck up to laden. Got pretty pissed about people's opinions of his book I see a chink in the oolon armor there, and I have a new toy. Yay!

oolon, slimy turd wrote:oolons not really here, this is oolons... errr... friend commenting for him, he says TFJ said he has pretty eyes and now he is scared to get on the bus... PS Why do I get the feeling this is the most attention TFJ has ever got?

Oh you couldn't stick a flounce with a case of epoxy and a bionic hand.

#28440

Cunning Punt wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:I don't ask anything during sex and neither does my partner. I cannot imagine the scenario of:

"May I kiss your navel?"
"Yes"
"May I suck your nipple?"
"Not tonight"
"Pokey bum frig?"
"Go on but I haven't had a shit in three days"

YMMV
Ha ha, I'm pissing myself.
:hankey:

To be fair I think I was in the wrong to reply with that. SurelyYouGuest did imply non-verbal communication was key during sex and not just "asking" as I thought. Meh.
That scenario has still never happened though.