This...right there. This is one of my biggest problems. PZ shows this a lot recently with his arbitrarily taking people's (and by "people" I mean those firmly planted between his ass cheeks) word for things and willfully and gleefully not checking sources and facts. He's a *scientist* for shit's sake. This is becoming a reoccurring theme among several within the FfTB/A+ realm. They have no business calling themselves skeptics.Mykeru wrote: Mostly though, right now, I hate those fuckers for calling themselves skeptics and then accepting claims without evidence, or with piss-poor evidence and actually subverting skepticism by deploying labels like "hyper-skepticism" when ordinary skepticism is applied to their pet horseshit.
Periodic Table of Swearing
-
- .
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 am
- Location: Kent, WA
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
-
- .
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
- Location: Peachtree City, GA
- Contact:
Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, RENEE!
That's not actually my ass. LolMykeru wrote:Seriously, Al, a little advice: http://goo.gl/l5tZfReneeHendricks wrote:LOL!!! Thanks Al!Al Stefanelli wrote:http://www.alstefanelli.com/Birthday2.jpg
Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, RENEE!
Prove it.Al Stefanelli wrote:That's not actually my ass. LolMykeru wrote:Seriously, Al, a little advice: http://goo.gl/l5tZfReneeHendricks wrote:LOL!!! Thanks Al!Al Stefanelli wrote:http://www.alstefanelli.com/Birthday2.jpg
Just send your ass shot for comparison to a third party we can agree on that would want to see that shit.
-
- .
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
- Location: Peachtree City, GA
- Contact:
Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, RENEE!
That would be extraordinarily dangerous.Mykeru wrote:Prove it.Al Stefanelli wrote:That's not actually my ass. LolMykeru wrote:Seriously, Al, a little advice: http://goo.gl/l5tZfReneeHendricks wrote:LOL!!! Thanks Al!Al Stefanelli wrote:http://www.alstefanelli.com/Birthday2.jpg
Just send your ass shot for comparison to a third party we can agree on that would want to see that shit.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Similar to atheists who are atheists for the wrong reasons, or lack of reasons, this rift has revealed the skeptics who are skeptics not because they apply method impartially, but because they began with the bias of "oh, i don't like that" and then sought ad hoc reasons to support that bias. P.Z is not so much an atheist as an anti-theist. He just really is pissed off at religion. then there's the Dillahunty effect of being able to parrot rebuttals to theism without understanding general principles, or simply choosing to give things he likes a pass.ReneeHendricks wrote:This...right there. This is one of my biggest problems. PZ shows this a lot recently with his arbitrarily taking people's (and by "people" I mean those firmly planted between his ass cheeks) word for things and willfully and gleefully not checking sources and facts. He's a *scientist* for shit's sake. This is becoming a reoccurring theme among several within the FfTB/A+ realm. They have no business calling themselves skeptics.Mykeru wrote: Mostly though, right now, I hate those fuckers for calling themselves skeptics and then accepting claims without evidence, or with piss-poor evidence and actually subverting skepticism by deploying labels like "hyper-skepticism" when ordinary skepticism is applied to their pet horseshit.
We thought skepticism was a garden in bloom, but now we have to pause to pull some weeds.
Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, RENEE!
Because it got me thinking - http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... nd%20CrackAl Stefanelli wrote:That's not actually my ass. LolMykeru wrote:Seriously, Al, a little advice: http://goo.gl/l5tZfReneeHendricks wrote:LOL!!! Thanks Al!Al Stefanelli wrote:http://www.alstefanelli.com/Birthday2.jpg
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Bugger it. Let's just concrete it over and paint it green.Mykeru wrote: We thought skepticism was a garden in bloom, but now we have to pause to pull some weeds.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
KiwiInOz wrote:Bugger it. Let's just concrete it over and paint it green.Mykeru wrote: We thought skepticism was a garden in bloom, but now we have to pause to pull some weeds.
Then all you'll need for the garden is a broom and a pooper scooper.....
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Happy birthday Renee!
Three pregnant women are waiting at the doctor's office. The brunette says: "I was on top when my baby was conceived, so I bet it's going to be a girl!" "Oh", says the redhead, "my husband was on top, so I must be having a little boy." The blonde starts crying. "What's wrong honey?" "I'M GOING TO HAVE PUPPIES!"Mykeru wrote:(checking schedule)sacha wrote:
give me doggie style any day.
-
- .
- Posts: 4024
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Brilliant, but I felt like something was missing. Do you think you could giggle more in your next video? That and sounding as if you're reading from a cue card like a robot seems to be 'key' for a keynote speaker.Mykeru wrote:[youtube]RJyb99pKhqc[/youtube]WoolyBumblebee wrote:Tigzy wrote:I wonder how Prune knows that Mykeru is a new Slymer?ReneeHendricks wrote:Hmm. Mykeru is compared to Bill O'Reilly and Howard Stern. Bit of an odd stretch there: http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ent-319255
Methinks the old crab has more than a few crafty ganders now and then...
EVERYONE WAVE TO OPHI :moon:
:lol:
-
- .
- Posts: 5357
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Saw the start of this thread in the "Introduce yourself" forum at Atheism+ last night; it has progressed and apparently - hold onto your hats, this is shocking, I know - resulted in the quick ban of the skeptic gentleman who started it: http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2331
I will someday learn how to do screen shots. Since that day has not arrived yet, here's my knockoff A+ scribe version of it (without links & Cipher's gifs).
tysixtus starts off introducing himself:
Near bottom of page 1, tysixtus says (in a longer post quoting Cipher's comments):
Cipher adds, "helpfully":
I will someday learn how to do screen shots. Since that day has not arrived yet, here's my knockoff A+ scribe version of it (without links & Cipher's gifs).
tysixtus starts off introducing himself:
You can imagine this goes over well. Cipher says English uses "they" as a gender-neutral pronoun. tyxistus points out that that won't be let through in publications e.g. journal articles. Cipher doesn't take this well and is (shocking, I now) kinda rude.Before we get to know each other I should probably list my privileges.
White male hetero slightly wealth-enabled slightly education-enabled atheist. I don't know how to use gender neutral pronouns, since we don't have any in the English language and I think all of the made up ones sound dumb.
Anyways, hello everyone. Some of you may know me from IIDB back in the day, and I currently visit TR as the best, most sensitive poster there. I have never raped anyone, and I have no intentions of doing so.
Near bottom of page 1, tysixtus says (in a longer post quoting Cipher's comments):
Cipher replies:I have to say, your mission statement and this attitude are really not compatible. Does a man have to prove to you that he is worth listening to? Is that how freethought operates? This isn't rhetorical, I'm genuinely curious. I want to know how you can hold these two contradictory positions at the same time.
At any rate, if I am in the position of having to explain why I should be allowed to post, nothing I can say will matter anyways.
tysixtus replies:I'd ask for a primer on understanding sarcasm, but it looks like you're in need of one yourself.If you want to, sure. What else do you need help with?
Welcome to skepticism! Looks like you've lost your way - "spouting whatever inane drivel comes to mind with no accountability" is that way. Have a nice day!Does a man have to prove to you that he is worth listening to? Is that how freethought operates?
Cipher quotes all of the above and adds:Yes, I suppose I am.Cipher wrote:
I'd ask for a primer on understanding sarcasm, but it looks like you're in need of one yourself.If you want to, sure. What else do you need help with?
That is not skepticism. In fact, it sounds a lot like the speech restrictions laid down by organized religion. You should just be honest with yourself, you don't want discussion. You want fascism.Welcome to skepticism! Looks like you've lost your way - "spouting whatever inane drivel comes to mind with no accountability" is that way. Have a nice day!Does a man have to prove to you that he is worth listening to? Is that how freethought operates?
tysixtus replies:animated gif of Bellatrix laughing [ Show ]animated gif of Sherlock closing the door in Anderson's face, with the text "Yes, thank you for your input." [ Show ]
Onamission5 weighs in:A stunning riposte, sir. I am undone.
Suncountess adds some drivel about dogwhistle (their new favorite term, apparently) & shit, then Cipher qutoes tyxistus's "stunning riposte" with a gif that suggests Cipher missed the point, then tyxistus posts his last hurrah:Got that, everyone? FASCISM.
Mod Hat: I see that you have chosen door number two. Please move quickly and collect your belongings, it closes soon.
Then some throw-away posts about fascism by Flewellyn & Grimalkin, then this from Flewellyn:Yes, it is on Wikipedia. Look it up. Wikipedia is pretty handy for things like this.Onamission5 wrote:
Got that, everyone? FASCISM.
I understand. I said something that hurt your feelings, and now I have to go. Enjoy your bubble, I hope it lasts a long time. You guys seem to need it.Mod Hat: I see that you have chosen door number two. Please move quickly and collect your belongings, it closes soon.
Onamission5 confirms that the deed has been done (tyxistus has been banned? But it doesn't say "banned" under his name in his posts).And nothing of value was lost.
Cipher adds, "helpfully":
Nobody gives a shit about yet another whingeing douchefuck who can't tell the difference between not being allowed to post on a forum and being brutally oppressed through violence. You're not important enough to hurt anyone's feelings - you're just another trolling, ignorant fuck, indistinguishable from the last, providing a bit of entertainment before your inevitable... how to put this delicately... departure from our space.
-
- .
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
A Biology professor walks into a bar...
http://i.imgur.com/dUzdR.jpg
It was an irony bar.
In reality the joke has a one word punchline: oolon
Is PZ really so dismissive of the intellect of his readers that he assumes they all have the attention span of a goldfish?
Come to think of it, and having read many of the responses on that and other FTB threads, he might have a point.
Why waste time building a real argument when you can type out any old crap - even stuff that directly contradicts what you have just said and done - and the plebs still rally behind you, burning torches and pitchforks in hand.
What is he saying here: that noelplumb99 should come onto the slymepit and argue against the unethical stuff (according to Peezus) that goes on here.
And if he does that? What exactly will happen?
Lets think of two possible scenarios.
1. noelplumb99 gets immediately labeled a disgusting slymer and banned from the FC5 blogs. All his previous arguments are deemed trolling and anyone who agrees with one of these points is tarred and feathered.
3. Rainbow coloured ponies that smell like chocolate fly out of my butt to the strains of Beethovens "Ode To Joy", while a secret portal opens up leading to the dressing room of actress Ornella Muti in 1980. She is wearing her Princess Aura costume from 'Flash Gordon', and looks pleased to see me. "Dick", she exclaims excitedly, "I've been waiting".
3. Peezus and O congratulate noelplumb99 for his even handed approach, saying that he's proven that he is a neutral party only interested in the arguments and not in personal attacks.
OK, OK, I needed three scenarios to get to the probabilities correct.
http://i.imgur.com/dUzdR.jpg
It was an irony bar.
In reality the joke has a one word punchline: oolon
Is PZ really so dismissive of the intellect of his readers that he assumes they all have the attention span of a goldfish?
Come to think of it, and having read many of the responses on that and other FTB threads, he might have a point.
Why waste time building a real argument when you can type out any old crap - even stuff that directly contradicts what you have just said and done - and the plebs still rally behind you, burning torches and pitchforks in hand.
What is he saying here: that noelplumb99 should come onto the slymepit and argue against the unethical stuff (according to Peezus) that goes on here.
And if he does that? What exactly will happen?
Lets think of two possible scenarios.
1. noelplumb99 gets immediately labeled a disgusting slymer and banned from the FC5 blogs. All his previous arguments are deemed trolling and anyone who agrees with one of these points is tarred and feathered.
3. Rainbow coloured ponies that smell like chocolate fly out of my butt to the strains of Beethovens "Ode To Joy", while a secret portal opens up leading to the dressing room of actress Ornella Muti in 1980. She is wearing her Princess Aura costume from 'Flash Gordon', and looks pleased to see me. "Dick", she exclaims excitedly, "I've been waiting".
3. Peezus and O congratulate noelplumb99 for his even handed approach, saying that he's proven that he is a neutral party only interested in the arguments and not in personal attacks.
OK, OK, I needed three scenarios to get to the probabilities correct.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
You might check out the debate with Paul Elam – of A Voice for Men – where he argues or strongly suggests, I think, that some jurists should vote for acquital in rape cases regardless of the evidence – jury nullification. That looks a little off the wall to me – and to a number of others here.Mykeru wrote:Well, of course they don't get that I'm "MRA" only to the extent that I'm a skeptic. If some truly bullshit claim came out of some MRA source, I would criticize that too.ReneeHendricks wrote:Hell, I'm actually quite surprised when I get mentioned in passing - you know, when they start talking about MRA lovers and chill girls :D I think one person even said that I'm "despicable" (https://twitter.com/aratina/status/259360017893953536 only found out due to Ophie being "confused" about a video I did not make).Mykeru wrote: Well, maybe now they will start giving me some love. I know I am hindered by my refusal to engage them on their own turf, but Jesus Fucking Christ, I felt like they were ignoring me.
I actually thrive on turning their kind of humorless, mean-spirited horseshit into life-affirming Lulz.
C'mon baboolies, think of the lulz. And the baby otters.
Groups of all kinds – from the McCarthyists to the Stalinists; from the Elks to the Boy Scouts – are prone to that. I don’t think it takes much effort to find evidence of that on either side of just about any line creating two subgroups out of one.I'm not distancing myself from the "MRA" label, just the presumption that they have that the opposition must be the ideological mirror image of them, knee-jerk group-think and all.
While you didn’t actually argue that all MRAs are like the ones you’ve seen so far, my experience is that there seems to be a not insignificant percentage of those who self-identify as MRAs who are just as off the wall and into woo just as deep as the most radical radfem. Woo – as evidenced by all of the different religions, secular and otherwise – seems to come in a great many varieties.But my experience so far with MRAs is that they would be far more receptive to criticism than these clowns because the MRM is essentially a skeptical reaction to a pernicious form of woo.
Apart from the questions of whether that is true and whether you’re any better in that department, I wonder what either has to do with the credibility of all of their arguments, whether they hold any water or not.Not to mention they are ugly as shit. I took a gnarled crap this morning that would be more likely to be hit on than The Beaver.
-
- .
- Posts: 4024
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
My irony-a-mater asploded when I read the latest piece from Lousy:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/lousycanuck ... -problems/
http://freethoughtblogs.com/lousycanuck ... -problems/
-
- .
- Posts: 5357
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
A+ forum has a spinoff: "Atheism Plus: A non safe space for atheists who want to discuss social justice" http://atheismplus.4rumer.com/
created by someone with 46 posts at A+ forum; announced here, to less-than-enthusiastic response: "NonSafe Space A+ Forum" http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2326
So far there are no rules. (The forum rules say that.) One of the 20 posts is by Kaine Damo, who was banned at A+ forum. He thinks he can be more patient & fit in better this time, but he also critiques the A+ forum including "I find the mods there in particular to be very negative and combative"...which one suspects might not be an approach guaranteeing a long-lived membership in the "non safe space", or at least may end up contributing to potential future strain between this variant A+ forum and the true A+ (Cipher-Grimalkin-ceepolk) forum.
created by someone with 46 posts at A+ forum; announced here, to less-than-enthusiastic response: "NonSafe Space A+ Forum" http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2326
So far there are no rules. (The forum rules say that.) One of the 20 posts is by Kaine Damo, who was banned at A+ forum. He thinks he can be more patient & fit in better this time, but he also critiques the A+ forum including "I find the mods there in particular to be very negative and combative"...which one suspects might not be an approach guaranteeing a long-lived membership in the "non safe space", or at least may end up contributing to potential future strain between this variant A+ forum and the true A+ (Cipher-Grimalkin-ceepolk) forum.
-
- .
- Posts: 5357
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Heh, in response #5 Greg Laden hands Lousy Canuck his smug uber-privilege back on a platter, including this:Pitchguest wrote:My irony-a-mater asploded when I read the latest piece from Lousy:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/lousycanuck ... -problems/
My respect for GL just rose about 2 microns....But some of the people living in what Americans see as trashed out mud huts in the stinking rotting jungle are actually several hundred percent happier than anyone reading this blog will ever be because things are pretty good. ...
I’m telling you this here because I made promises to some of the people in the mud huts to not facilitate the “first world†misunderstanding of everything beyond their noses.
OK you may continue. Thank you very much.
-
- .
- Posts: 2480
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Well now, it did not take very long for the new Church of AâœTheism to have its first true schism.Skep tickle wrote:A+ forum has a spinoff: "Atheism Plus: A non safe space for atheists who want to discuss social justice"
Splitters!
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Nobody expects the Judean People's Front! Amongst our weaponry are such diverse elements as: fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency, an almost fanatical devotion toSkep tickle wrote:true A+ (Cipher-Grimalkin-ceepolk) forum.
-
- .
- Posts: 4024
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Ah, Cuduggan2K2. The rape victim who was told he would have been better off dead (murdered) than raped, by the lovely piegasm.Skep tickle wrote:A+ forum has a spinoff: "Atheism Plus: A non safe space for atheists who want to discuss social justice" http://atheismplus.4rumer.com/
created by someone with 46 posts at A+ forum; announced here, to less-than-enthusiastic response: "NonSafe Space A+ Forum" http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2326
So far there are no rules. (The forum rules say that.) One of the 20 posts is by Kaine Damo, who was banned at A+ forum. He thinks he can be more patient & fit in better this time, but he also critiques the A+ forum including "I find the mods there in particular to be very negative and combative"...which one suspects might not be an approach guaranteeing a long-lived membership in the "non safe space", or at least may end up contributing to potential future strain between this variant A+ forum and the true A+ (Cipher-Grimalkin-ceepolk) forum.
Haha. Hahaha. Hahahahaha.
-
- .
- Posts: 5357
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Ah! The name looked vaguely familiar but I didn't remember why. Interesting; perhaps lingering guilt is why they don't savage him more for having created the new space.Pitchguest wrote:Ah, Cuduggan2K2. The rape victim who was told he would have been better off dead (murdered) than raped, by the lovely piegasm.Skep tickle wrote:A+ forum has a spinoff: "Atheism Plus: A non safe space for atheists who want to discuss social justice" http://atheismplus.4rumer.com/
created by someone with 46 posts at A+ forum...
Haha. Hahaha. Hahahahaha.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
[youtube]cWlAgPJdHdA[/youtube]Pitchguest wrote:My irony-a-mater asploded when I read the latest piece from Lousy:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/lousycanuck ... -problems/
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
It was common knowledge while he was alive, and I had planned to meet him in SF, when he was here (SF) for part of his book tour, which was cancelled last minute, as he had just become aware of his condition.decius wrote:I can't speak for those who object to Ryfsten's philosophy, but I suspect a couple of reasons. For one thing, that's a huge hypothetical (Hitch being dead)...sacha wrote:
Everyone knows I would have fucked Hitch without a moments hesitation. No one has ever mentioned how I should be concerned about Carol Blue.
It seems I may have missed a good part of the discussion, as I was not aware of this behaviour at all.decius wrote:...and you didn't write emails to Carol Blue stating your intentions while he was alive, which might have been perceived as obsessive, callous and predatory.
Cheers for the explanation.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I'm so sorry, Phil (and Ali).Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Ali received her first "paycheck" for her "new job", and it turns out it was a scam, a fraud, a con work. In other words, we are in financial deep shit*. Makes me angry, very angry, and you wouldn't like me when I'm angry (no, really, you wouldn't, I spend my days being bitchy and shit).
SO NO ONE DARE PISS ME OFF TODAY!!!
*Maybe I should ask for donations... :whistle:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
From the Slate article:
12 hours? Makes you wonder what other details she is exaggerating.After all, it seemed rather obvious to me that if your goal is to get sex or even just companionship, the very worst way to go about attaining that goal is to attend a conference, listen to a woman speak for 12 hours about how uncomfortable she is being sexualized at conferences, wait for her to express a desire to go to sleep, follow her into an isolated space, and then suggest she go back to your hotel room for “coffee,†which, by the way, is available at the hotel bar you just left.
-
- .
- Posts: 4024
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
What do you say to a mass registration onto that site? That would surely rile up the A+ commentariat. I've already cast my lot in, fairly conspicuous. Maybe they won't realise I'm a Pitter so soon. :DSkep tickle wrote:Ah! The name looked vaguely familiar but I didn't remember why. Interesting; perhaps lingering guilt is why they don't savage him more for having created the new space.Pitchguest wrote:Ah, Cuduggan2K2. The rape victim who was told he would have been better off dead (murdered) than raped, by the lovely piegasm.Skep tickle wrote:A+ forum has a spinoff: "Atheism Plus: A non safe space for atheists who want to discuss social justice" http://atheismplus.4rumer.com/
created by someone with 46 posts at A+ forum...
Haha. Hahaha. Hahahahaha.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
awww that got me wet, my lovefranc wrote:Fuck you. You're all cunts. Sacha has more balls than all of you combined. You get franc lite here. She listens to franc unleashed - and doesn't blink. If the FC5 eavesdropped, their DNA would unravel into raw amino acids. Here, by relative standards, you get the Barbara Cartland version.Lsuoma wrote:Franc still hates everyone except you.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I promise to rein myself in, until I'm sure I won't break you.Mykeru wrote:(checking schedule)sacha wrote:
give me doggie style any day.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
If it's true, then I'm surprised anyone still had the willpower to pay attention and not zone-out by the 30 minute mark. And I thought she can't recognize faces. So how does she know the guy (she can't give a description of) was in attendance for her talk? How does she know he was at the hotel for the convention at all, or is in anyway connected to the skeptic community? I know, I know. All old points that have been raised a zillion times around here, but if she can be repetitive so can I.Pinker wrote:From the Slate article:12 hours? Makes you wonder what other details she is exaggerating.After all, it seemed rather obvious to me that if your goal is to get sex or even just companionship, the very worst way to go about attaining that goal is to attend a conference, listen to a woman speak for 12 hours about how uncomfortable she is being sexualized at conferences, wait for her to express a desire to go to sleep, follow her into an isolated space, and then suggest she go back to your hotel room for “coffee,†which, by the way, is available at the hotel bar you just left.
btw, did Watson ever apologize to Stef McGraw for equating her simple point of disagreement with anonymous rape threats? Just asking for the benefit of any lurkers who might barely be catching up with all this shit due to the slate article.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
SLATE published her?Dilurk wrote:http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/ ... reats.html Guess who?
Just for interest, I wonder how many rape threats Jessica Ahlquist received?
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Outwest wrote:Anyway...Slate? They'll publish anyone's rubbish. I've seen articles by PZ Myers in their a couple of times.
Hitch used to write for Slate!
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
hello
i am quite drunk but
is our new news that ERV is curing HIV now?
FUCK YEAH
SLYMEPIT FOR THE WIN
also can someone point me to a link so i can buy that woman a drink
seirously
i am quite drunk but
is our new news that ERV is curing HIV now?
FUCK YEAH
SLYMEPIT FOR THE WIN
also can someone point me to a link so i can buy that woman a drink
seirously
-
- .
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Pinker wrote:From the Slate article:12 hours? Makes you wonder what other details she is exaggerating.After all, it seemed rather obvious to me that if your goal is to get sex or even just companionship, the very worst way to go about attaining that goal is to attend a conference, listen to a woman speak for 12 hours about how uncomfortable she is being sexualized at conferences, wait for her to express a desire to go to sleep, follow her into an isolated space, and then suggest she go back to your hotel room for “coffee,†which, by the way, is available at the hotel bar you just left.
It's time dilation, folks.
As she becomes a bigger and bigger star, her gravity increases, which, as we all know, has an effect on the apparent speed of light and thus time.
Just a year ago it was 10 hours (she gives that figure in the althouse bloggingheads interview)
http://althouse.blogspot.com/2011/07/re ... -time.html
Now it's 12.
If her internet fame goes on increasing at at the current exponential rate I calculate that this time next year the story will be that on that day people listened to her talk for 48 hours non-stop about how she hates being sexualized by guys making a pass at her.
As for her actually saying this at the Dublin conference, there is no record.
It wasn't during her actual talk (Aaron Ra has the talk on his youtube channel).
It could only have been during her bar session (10 hours, 12 hours - who the hell can remember details after that length of time drinking in a Dublin bar!)
I have only seen one person admit to being there at the time - that looney PZ sycophant, Rorscharch - and even he says he went to bed early and didn't see Rebecca leave. I havent seen anyone who thought they knew who Elevatorguy really was.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
hahaha! "other continents" how tactful.Notung wrote:I must say, noelplum99 is one of my favourite commentators on all of this. He has a kind of 'from the outside looking in' feel to his expressions and opinions and it's quite refreshing. It's like picking an intelligent person in a British street and saying 'what do you think of all this?'. I say British because I get the feeling that a lot of this 'privilege', SJW, etc. stuff comes from other continents. I've literally never come across it in real life over here.
-
- .
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:11 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
ABBIE! For goodness sake, behave your bloody self, going around doing important scientific work like that - you know damn well what this is going to lead to?ERV wrote:Today Im scientist-high. Like when you think you might have found something *amazing*, and youre allowing yourself a bit of hope all of your work + luck might actually pay off. Moved another big step forward on a hail-mary project that might actually ultimately be a treatment, if not The Treatment for HIV/AIDS.Get home, relax. "Hey! Lets see what Watson did today!"Me: *showing results to Bossman*
Bossman: lol. Were gonna cure AIDS. LOL!
Me: LOL!
Both of us: *HIGH-FIVE!!!!*
Me: *goes back to work*Oh.Dilurk wrote:http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/ ... reats.html Guess who?
Well.
From each according to their ability.
MOAR SEX!
There is Becci and all the others running around doing all the real hard work making sure people never have sex ever again because everyone will be too paranoid about rape and privilege in elevators and what do you do? You and your team work to help cure AIDS!!
If the population rises past 8 Billion in a short time, I'm blaming you! :D
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I get you, Baby.KiwiInOz wrote:Dammit woman. I was taking the piss out of you having a pomeranian. First MKG, and now you. At least Jack Rayner gets me.ReneeHendricks wrote:Several - 4 in total. I should have said veterinarian's. "Vets" is a bit too much shorthand, I suppose.KiwiInOz wrote:Sorry; must have misread. I thought that you said you had a dog.ReneeHendricks wrote:[
It can only get better after the fiasco of taking my damned Pomeranian into the vets.
:whistle:
<slumps off back into corner>
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Could you be more right than that? Me thinks notGet home, relax. "Hey! Lets see what Watson did today!"Oh.Dilurk wrote:http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/ ... reats.html Guess who?
Well.
From each according to their ability.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Philip of Tealand wrote:ABBIE! For goodness sake, behave your bloody self, going around doing important scientific work like that - you know damn well what this is going to lead to?ERV wrote:Today Im scientist-high. Like when you think you might have found something *amazing*, and youre allowing yourself a bit of hope all of your work + luck might actually pay off. Moved another big step forward on a hail-mary project that might actually ultimately be a treatment, if not The Treatment for HIV/AIDS.Get home, relax. "Hey! Lets see what Watson did today!"Me: *showing results to Bossman*
Bossman: lol. Were gonna cure AIDS. LOL!
Me: LOL!
Both of us: *HIGH-FIVE!!!!*
Me: *goes back to work*Oh.Dilurk wrote:http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/ ... reats.html Guess who?
Well.
From each according to their ability.
MOAR SEX!
There is Becci and all the others running around doing all the real hard work making sure people never have sex ever again because everyone will be too paranoid about rape and privilege in elevators and what do you do? You and your team work to help cure AIDS!!
If the population rises past 8 Billion in a short time, I'm blaming you! :D
Somebody buy that woman a coffee.
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Great news Abbie, let's hope it leads to something even more exciting.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Lsuoma wrote:Coincidence!KiwiInOz wrote:http://www.zooborns.com/.a/6a010535647b ... 970d-500wi
Latest trend in pets - a baby echidna - from Taronga Zoo in Sydney.
Apparently these are called puggles, and I was just chatting to a colleague of mine who owns a puggle (pug/beagle cross dog)...
for fuck's sake. I've worked with dogs for over 15 years, and have volunteered for homeless, neglected, and abused dogs for even longer. "Designer Dogs" are for those that think having a mutt is below them. I refuse to acknowledge their "designer status". They are another commodity for unethical breeders (99.9% are unethical), catering to people who think that the more they spend on a dog, the more status they have in their fucked community of peers. They need to take all of the bloody ridiculous designer clothes they buy to dress up their "designer dogs" and carry around a fucking doll instead.
Where is my army of vultures??!!
Dogs (and other animals) are not status symbols.
by the way, KiwiInOz's little, fluffy, purebred, piss take was funny and spot on.
and Kiwi, I could have quite a collection of balls from all the neutered dogs...
Oh yes, it's the dog's bollocks
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I've put this out there before, but bears repeating:sacha wrote:SLATE published her?Dilurk wrote:http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/ ... reats.html Guess who?
Just for interest, I wonder how many rape threats Jessica Ahlquist received?
Rebecca Watson: College student. Receives rape threats, too scared to go to TAM (a 3 day event).
Jessica Ahlquist: High school student. Receives rape threats, attends school every fucking day.
How soon can we have Jessica replace Rebecca at all the meetings?
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
hahaha! I'll take puppies any day over human babies, so I guess this blond must be doing something right.windy wrote:Happy birthday Renee!
Three pregnant women are waiting at the doctor's office. The brunette says: "I was on top when my baby was conceived, so I bet it's going to be a girl!" "Oh", says the redhead, "my husband was on top, so I must be having a little boy." The blonde starts crying. "What's wrong honey?" "I'M GOING TO HAVE PUPPIES!"Mykeru wrote:(checking schedule)sacha wrote:
give me doggie style any day.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Indeed. I find dogs make better people than most people.sacha wrote:hahaha! I'll take puppies any day over human babies, so I guess this blond must be doing something right.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Did anything come of the poe mod on the A+ boards?
-
- .
- Posts: 4024
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I have so much respect for this young woman, Jessica Ahlquist. So much more considering that she's actually received real death threats, from people most likely attending her same school, and yet perseveres and hasn't allowed it to turn her into a husk of victim mentality. It makes me incredibly melancholic that the magazine that once published articles for the Hitch now deem the smut Watson and Myers spew worthy of publication.comslave wrote:I've put this out there before, but bears repeating:sacha wrote:SLATE published her?Dilurk wrote:http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/ ... reats.html Guess who?
Just for interest, I wonder how many rape threats Jessica Ahlquist received?
Rebecca Watson: College student. Receives rape threats, too scared to go to TAM (a 3 day event).
Jessica Ahlquist: High school student. Receives rape threats, attends school every fucking day.
How soon can we have Jessica replace Rebecca at all the meetings?
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
+1comslave wrote:I've put this out there before, but bears repeating:sacha wrote:SLATE published her?Dilurk wrote:http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/ ... reats.html Guess who?
Just for interest, I wonder how many rape threats Jessica Ahlquist received?
Rebecca Watson: College student. Receives rape threats, too scared to go to TAM (a 3 day event).
Jessica Ahlquist: High school student. Receives rape threats, attends school every fucking day.
How soon can we have Jessica replace Rebecca at all the meetings?
Yey Abbie!
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
No, apart from a user registering here with the user name "flewellyn" (the A+ mod at the centre of Dillahuntygate), which caused some speculation that it may be a hint from the poe.SPACKlick wrote:Did anything come of the poe mod on the A+ boards?
Personally, I have my doubts the poe mod exists. Iftheret is a poe, I hope it isn't flewellyn - that will give the A+ the excuse they're looking for to absolve themselves of responsibility.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Is she trying to point out how hard up some people are?Pinker wrote:From the Slate article:12 hours? Makes you wonder what other details she is exaggerating.After all, it seemed rather obvious to me that if your goal is to get sex or even just companionship, the very worst way to go about attaining that goal is to attend a conference, listen to a woman speak for 12 hours about how uncomfortable she is being sexualized at conferences, wait for her to express a desire to go to sleep, follow her into an isolated space, and then suggest she go back to your hotel room for “coffee,†which, by the way, is available at the hotel bar you just left.
-
- .
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:10 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Sex or companionship? How could anyone listen to someone like RW for 12 hours and want anything other than the release of death?
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Get it right. I'm Keyser Söze. My empire selling fake SurlyRamics facilitates my ability to run sweatshops in western China and Myanmar for the sole purpose of creating over 90% of every sock puppet in every forum the world, entirely at my command and whim. The beauty of this scenario is that my confirming or denying anything has become redundant - what I may say has no chance of competing with popular imagination.oolon, slimy turd wrote:I know you like to feel superior to the FtBs-lot but why would anyone get Barfs reference? I did cos I had the misfortune of flicking through the pit earlier... No one else would. I think I'll let Stephanie know Barf is likely a sock of Hoggle, fits his MO of drive by wanking as well.
I guess Oolon still thinks he's one step ahead...
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Anyone else notice that new little meme they've cooked up in that B&W thread? Apparently putting forward a reasoned argument based on logic, facts and really basic common sense is now "soft trolling".
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Actually it was just one guy but still. I think it has potential.
-
- .
- Posts: 1166
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:27 am
- Location: In the basement of the University of Minnesota Morris
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
That's awesome.ERV wrote:Today Im scientist-high. Like when you think you might have found something *amazing*, and youre allowing yourself a bit of hope all of your work + luck might actually pay off. Moved another big step forward on a hail-mary project that might actually ultimately be a treatment, if not The Treatment for HIV/AIDS.
How long have you been at this, by the way? I used to be a SceinceDaily junky a few years ago, and would end up reading press releases on HIV/AIDS research pretty often. Would be interesting if some of those press releases were based on your work. :)
A little bit of self disclosure, but it's not like I'm being specific or anything: A friend of mine is infected with HIV, but they've managed to keep it at bay. Last I heard it's been suppressed to the point where it is undetectable in their blood. Sure, their life has been drastically altered because of it, but if the way they've kept themselves relatively healthy all of this time, and news on progress [like with your work] are any indication, I think it's safe to say that they will probably be dying in a manner closer to those of us that are not infected. So, I'd like to thank you for the work that you do, even if it might not be directly affecting my friend yet. This is a friend I like having around...
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Precisely it. Inability to empathise with the other, therefore the other is irrelevant. Must be hanging around Skepchick too long. Like Becky Watson sending her well meaning handler out into the night for vegetarian cashew chicken just for lulz. Not Becky's fault they were that stupid haha.SPACKlick wrote:So you consider being hurt by having trust violated a hangup rather than a useful and productive social emotion, interesting. Remind me which school of sociopathy that comes from?Rystefn wrote:I will go out of my way to help people who are trying but having a hard time letting go of their hangups. I will not fucking tiptoe around worrying about everybody's goddamned feelings.
Social contracts are what bind us together in what we call communities. To piss on these social contracts and then claim to want to help your fellow man whenever possible is just... It leaves me speechless. I do not see any difference between that and the sociopathy of SulkyAmy easing her soul by making trivial donations from her retard jewellery to whatever pop cause of the day. "Cognitive dissonance" doesn't even scratch the surface.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Ah, glasshoppa, you worked that one out? We have agreement on at least something.Rystefn wrote:Go fuck yourself, Steersman.
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
It's a keeper. Add it to the other pointless phrases designed to shut down debate.cunt wrote:Anyone else notice that new little meme they've cooked up in that B&W thread? Apparently putting forward a reasoned argument based on logic, facts and really basic common sense is now "soft trolling".
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
LOL. Never heard of trigger warnings?????Pinker wrote:http://i.imgur.com/TPxLz.jpg
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
DNA unravelling into raw amino acids? Is this some new form of DNA I haven't heard of before?
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Another irony-meter exploded here. From Popehat, via B&W:
Use "offense" to silence dissent? Who would do that? WHO??But they reject that inheritance, choosing instead a life of petty bureaucratism and insipid, infantilizing "civility." Offered an opportunity to treat both speakers and listeners as adults, they treat them as children instead — children whose words must be curtailed until they do not offend even the most intolerant and overly sensitive child in the class.
A nation run by the Swifts, Daveys, Silcocks,and Joneses of the world will be weak and dull-witted and crabbed and pointless. Such people exist in every place; it's up to us whether we will put up with them or call them out. I prefer calling them out. So write about things like this. Help shine a light on the Swifts and Daveys and Silcocks and Joneses and their censorious twatwafflery. Write them and express yourself — in a civil and non-harassing manner, please.
Don't let idiocy like this go without comment, until it becomes the norm. Don't let your home become a place where the petty and the wicked use "blasphemy" and "offense" as an excuse to silence dissent. Fight back.