THAT MUSIC! HAHAHA! It works so well.bhoytony wrote:
Oh. My. Fucking. God. They are fucking radio rental over there. I'll post my favourite bit, but you need to play this backing music while you read it.
[youtube]C6ZDsUGiGqM[/youtube]
When I first came here, I said that part of me thought that "[t]his will only end badly." And, not even a month later, it already has. The truth is, I'm crying as I write this. Maybe some of you will think that's silly or over dramatic. But online interactions are just as meaningful and important as offline interactions, and they have the same potential to bring joy... and pain.
So I'm doing the only thing that I can do. I'm picking up the pieces and retreating, away from forums and blogs and movements. Will I ever be back? I don't know. I'm not going to say "never" because none of us know what the future holds. But I think it's going to be a long time before I feel strong enough to put myself out there again, for any reason.
tekanji
Periodic Table of Swearing
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Aye lad. Tell me about it.bhoytony wrote:It's just a game of footy to me. I'm a Tim, but I don't give a fuck about all that Pope's eleven shite.Git wrote: Ahahahaha! giggles Sevco Disunited never fail to disappoint.
Pretty sure I'm meant to be a hun, but I really couldn't give a shit either way. Not living in a sectarian cesspit does that to you.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
As I stated earlier, it is only the people who have been *critical* of Amy who have gotten DMCA threats.
Anyone who posts positive things aka advertisements (see io9), are given a free pass.
Either theyre both DMCA worthy, or theyre both not. That only the critical ones are is evidence that Amy is abusing DMCA to silence criticism.
Anyone who posts positive things aka advertisements (see io9), are given a free pass.
Either theyre both DMCA worthy, or theyre both not. That only the critical ones are is evidence that Amy is abusing DMCA to silence criticism.
-
- .
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Brillant!Tony Parsehole wrote:THAT MUSIC! HAHAHA! It works so well.bhoytony wrote:
Oh. My. Fucking. God. They are fucking radio rental over there. I'll post my favourite bit, but you need to play this backing music while you read it.
[youtube]C6ZDsUGiGqM[/youtube]
When I first came here, I said that part of me thought that "[t]his will only end badly." And, not even a month later, it already has. The truth is, I'm crying as I write this. Maybe some of you will think that's silly or over dramatic. But online interactions are just as meaningful and important as offline interactions, and they have the same potential to bring joy... and pain.
So I'm doing the only thing that I can do. I'm picking up the pieces and retreating, away from forums and blogs and movements. Will I ever be back? I don't know. I'm not going to say "never" because none of us know what the future holds. But I think it's going to be a long time before I feel strong enough to put myself out there again, for any reason.
tekanji
We should collect these pieces and get criticalg on youtube to do a dramatic reading, the same way he did for 'Schrödingers Rapist'. :lol:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Agreed. Brilliant! :lol:Git wrote:Ah Bhoytony you fucking tim, you win an internet for that.
And I quite like the idea of adding soundtracks for some of the more dramatic A+ forum/FfTB/Skepchick comments and posts.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
You utter bastard. Why didn't you put trigger warnings on that video? I just suffered *bad* Steve Wright / James Whale flashbacks because of playing that.bhoytony wrote:Oh. My. Fucking. God. They are fucking radio rental over there. I'll post my favourite bit, but you need to play this backing music while you read it.
[youtube]C6ZDsUGiGqM[/youtube]
That's it *sob*. I can't take it any more. I'm flouncing this forum and I'm not coming back, not ever. Call the fucking Whaaaambulance.
Small print: "not ever" may include any time, from ten minutes to all eternity.
:violin:
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Thanks. I didn't know that. Fitting title. :)Lsuoma wrote:Posterboy for Creationist Stupidity: it's Thunderf00t's moniker for him.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Scented Nectar wrote:Thanks. I didn't know that. Fitting title. :)Lsuoma wrote:Posterboy for Creationist Stupidity: it's Thunderf00t's moniker for him.
That gives the A+ forum a new slogan "A+ - we're as smart as creationists"
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
http://bestdemotivationalposters.com/wp ... osters.jpgSpence wrote:Oolon is certainly most dishonest about how s/he goes about arguing.
Edited to remove PII.
Last edited by Lsuoma on Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: To remove PII.
Reason: To remove PII.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
The bit in bold says more than enough about the mindset of the A+theism crowd. Online interactions are only as important and meaningful as offline interactions to people who don't really have all that much offline interaction. It sounds like what they really want are the friends and acceptance they apparently never got that much of in real life. I mean c'mon, you're crying over what Matt did? Strong enough to put yourself out there? Out where? An anonymous forum where the people you're interacting with are practically faceless words on a screen. Shit, I'd hate to be around any of them when they get a hangnail, the pain might just be too much for them to bear.When I first came here, I said that part of me thought that "[t]his will only end badly." And, not even a month later, it already has. The truth is, I'm crying as I write this. Maybe some of you will think that's silly or over dramatic. But online interactions are just as meaningful and important as offline interactions, and they have the same potential to bring joy... and pain.
So I'm doing the only thing that I can do. I'm picking up the pieces and retreating, away from forums and blogs and movements. Will I ever be back? I don't know. I'm not going to say "never" because none of us know what the future holds. But I think it's going to be a long time before I feel strong enough to put myself out there again, for any reason.
Oh, and oolon, I'm getting the impression that you and I are doomed to keep going around in a circle on this issue, repeating the same points over and over again without progress one way or the other. Since my goal wasn't to change your mind but to explain my personal pov, I don't think I know how to clarify my position any better than I already have in my two (very lengthy) replies to you. If that's not enough than I don't know where to go from here. I will answer to this though,
Not as 'franc hoggle' he wouldn't be. As 'franc hoggle' he is "Proud angry masturbator, aficionado of scat porn, all-around repulsive fellow, and that's not me speculating, PZ have said as much (http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/dungeon/). And while we're at it, ask Abbie about how PZ and Greta have announced that they refuse to attend the same conferences as her because they supposedly 'fear for their safety' .I'd bet you even the most brass-necked Pharyngulite will concede there is a chance 'franc hoggle' even could be 'redeemed'
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
That's ok, your secret code is safe with me. I forget things frequently! :)Spence wrote:Yeah, my bad, I was throwing out references for the in-group clique. Not very slymepit of me, but I couldn't resist :whistle:
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I especially liked it when they accidently called it A+theism. Goes well with being as smart as creationists. :)Badger3k wrote:That gives the A+ forum a new slogan "A+ - we're as smart as creationists"Scented Nectar wrote:Thanks. I didn't know that. Fitting title. :)Lsuoma wrote:Posterboy for Creationist Stupidity: it's Thunderf00t's moniker for him.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I thought you originally meant Laura Ingalls Wilder. Anyway, bro, as a Brit I still know more than most Septics...mikelf wrote:How did you get into my beautiful nation without being familiar with our literary canon?Lsuoma wrote:Who's LW?mikelf wrote: I know I shouldn't generalize, but is there anyone over there that isn't Laura Wingfield?
Here you go.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
SORRY, Bhoytony, I accidentally trashed your post when redacting the doxxing. Lsuoma.Magritte wrote:I am a knob.
Last edited by Lsuoma on Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Removing Magritte's unwise post.
Reason: Removing Magritte's unwise post.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
For the record, I don't care if oolon is a "he" or a "she", they will be treated equally by me irrespective of gender. I also don't care for oolon's real name either, so cut out the doc dropping crap. As windy sez, that's FTB bullshit.Magritte wrote:For the record, Oolon is a "he". On FtB, he links his comments to his website: oolon.co.ukSpence wrote:Oolon is certainly most dishonest about how s/he goes about arguing.
-
- .
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:56 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
fuck off. We don't need that information. It is useless to us. Yes, it's available on the internet, but there's no reason to make it prominent here. It's useless to anyone with good intentions. Christ, at least Vacula did it to prove a point.Magritte wrote:For the record, Oolon is a "he". On FtB, he links his comments to his website: oolon.co.ukSpence wrote:Oolon is certainly most dishonest about how s/he goes about arguing.
All .uk names are registered with AnalTUBE, which provide a publicly searchable database of, e.g:
http://www.DIXXX.gov
This shows that the site was registered on the 12th August 2012 by "REDACTED".
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Not Steve Wright, it's the awesome Simon Bates. He could have kept his show going for years just reading out those posts from the Large Moron Collider (love it). And coming up next it's the Golden HourSpence wrote: You utter bastard. Why didn't you put trigger warnings on that video? I just suffered *bad* Steve Wright / James Whale flashbacks because of playing that.
That's it *sob*. I can't take it any more. I'm flouncing this forum and I'm not coming back, not ever. Call the fucking Whaaaambulance.
Small print: "not ever" may include any time, from ten minutes to all eternity.
:violin:
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I agree, although I think it may even be oolon himself testing doxing himself to see how we'll react. This is probably one of those rare times when the links and names should be edited out of the posts. Anyone can still do a WHOIS, but that way oolon won't be able to whine and call it a docdrop. Technically it probably isn't, since it's publicly available, but first time poster docdropper smells like a setup.bhoytony wrote:Really nice first post. I find it very suspicious that new poster turns up out of the blue and starts dumping people's real life info.Magritte wrote:For the record, Oolon is a "he". On FtB, he links his comments to his website: oolon.co.ukSpence wrote:Oolon is certainly most dishonest about how s/he goes about arguing.
Now I think oolon is a slimy turd, but there is no need for this bollocks.
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Is there a mod in the house? :shock:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
This is obviously someone who just wants the Slimepit to look bad, and no one here thinks shit like this is a good thing. In any case, it's up to Lsuoma what he wants to do. Personally, when someone's very first post is doc dropping, I'm for banning because that person is just here to cause trouble. But, not my call.Scented Nectar wrote:I agree, although I think it may even be oolon himself testing doxing himself to see how we'll react. This is probably one of those rare times when the links and names should be edited out of the posts. Anyone can still do a WHOIS, but that way oolon won't be able to whine and call it a docdrop. Technically it probably isn't, since it's publicly available, but first time poster docdropper smells like a setup.bhoytony wrote:Really nice first post. I find it very suspicious that new poster turns up out of the blue and starts dumping people's real life info.Magritte wrote:For the record, Oolon is a "he". On FtB, he links his comments to his website: oolon.co.ukSpence wrote:Oolon is certainly most dishonest about how s/he goes about arguing.
Now I think oolon is a slimy turd, but there is no need for this bollocks.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
You coulda taken care of it, if you hadn't chickened out, ya weenie :)Scented Nectar wrote:Is there a mod in the house? :shock:
-
- .
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Can an admin get rid of oolons docs (and that link that someone posted to Surly Amy's surlynamic registration.)
I'd prefer if we had some basic rule here about not doxxing people.
That's FTB style activity - we really don't want to sink to that level.
I'd prefer if we had some basic rule here about not doxxing people.
That's FTB style activity - we really don't want to sink to that level.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
yes, but currently posting mobile.Scented Nectar wrote:Is there a mod in the house? :shock:
Not able to get moderific on this till I get back to my hotel.
-
- .
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:48 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Ahh a new poster - sorry I was about to say that this is a pretty shitty move on the slimepitters part. I mainly thought Dicks 'quoting' me was a symptom of me annoying him so I was happy to let that one pass. However seeing someone I'd not even directly addressed doing this was a bit low. I am a techie so I knew the registration would show the name I used... I shouldn't have opted out from showing my 'address' - could have led to some free pizzas for someone ;-)bhoytony wrote:Really nice first post. I find it very suspicious that new poster turns up out of the blue and starts dumping people's real life info.Magritte wrote:For the record, Oolon is a "he". On FtB, he links his comments to his website: oolon.co.ukSpence wrote:Oolon is certainly most dishonest about how s/he goes about arguing.
Redacted by the Fascist Tit.
Now I think oolon is a slimy turd, but there is no need for this bollocks.
Last edited by Lsuoma on Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Missed taking out PII when this was first posted.
Reason: Missed taking out PII when this was first posted.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Yeah, I'm thinking a dox-and-yer-gone policy might not be a bad idea...
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Lsuoma, I have adminned these types of boards before. If you ever need an extra hand with basic admin tasks like the current situation, let me know. I don't post every day but I do come here more than once a day to read. And I'd be glad to help when I can.Lsuoma wrote:yes, but currently posting mobile.Scented Nectar wrote:Is there a mod in the house? :shock:
Not able to get moderific on this till I get back to my hotel.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I'm very much against banning, it seems to go against the spirit of the board. As you say it's up to Lsuoma, but thats what I think.Gumby wrote: This is obviously someone who just wants the Slimepit to look bad, and no one here thinks shit like this is a good thing. In any case, it's up to Lsuoma what he wants to do. Personally, when someone's very first post is doc dropping, I'm for banning because that person is just here to cause trouble. But, not my call.
Speaking of banning, I wonder how long it would last if I were to go over to the LMC and post my soundtrack to that heartbreaking tale.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I am very much against banning as well. It does go against the spirit of things here. But when someone signs up just to dox someone, I tend to think there's exceptions to every rule.bhoytony wrote:I'm very much against banning, it seems to go against the spirit of the board. As you say it's up to Lsuoma, but thats what I think.Gumby wrote: This is obviously someone who just wants the Slimepit to look bad, and no one here thinks shit like this is a good thing. In any case, it's up to Lsuoma what he wants to do. Personally, when someone's very first post is doc dropping, I'm for banning because that person is just here to cause trouble. But, not my call.
Speaking of banning, I wonder how long it would last if I were to go over to the LMC and post my soundtrack to that heartbreaking tale.
-
- .
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:48 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Brilliant! Such a great 20-20 memory you must lead a very fulfilled life online Spence :-)Spence wrote:Oolon is certainly most dishonest about how s/he goes about arguing. Whilst I am reluctant to agree with a separate thread, I would note that I pwned oolon in a debate on Thunderf00t's blog by pinning them down to one subject. Because thunderf00t's blog was threaded, replies were always associated with the original comment and oolon, being a troll, had to reply to that comment and not ignore or cherry pick responses. By pinning him/her down to one topic which s/he was unable to defend (because he lacks sufficient critical thinking ability to do so), s/he eventually cried off and refused to debate me, rather than retract the statement that s/he was unable to support.
Which, against such a blatant troll, is a pretty epic win IMNSHO :dance:
We need to be careful though. I think oolon should be allowed to have a voice here, troll or otherwise, and some dissenting voices, even fully retarded ones, are better than none.
I seem to remember it as we went round and round and round on the previous thread with no one giving ground. Probably same as Saint N has recognised we will here too - we need to agree to disagree. Then on the next thread you tried to keep the pointless discussion going so I took the piss rather than the bait and you missed it was even a joke! I'll refer you to Dunning-Kruger for more investigation, you are a good 'un :think:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Rather than ban, why not just replace the personal details of a doxxing post with asterisks - but keep the essential content (such as it is) of the post there? Seems a fair compromise to me.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Oooh great a real account , now to set up that ignore filteroolon, slimy turd wrote:
-
- .
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Oi!oolon, slimy turd wrote:Ahh a new poster - sorry I was about to say that this is a pretty shitty move on the slimepitters part. I mainly thought Dicks 'quoting' me was a symptom of me annoying him so I was happy to let that one pass. However seeing someone I'd not even directly addressed doing this was a bit low. I am a techie so I knew the registration would show the name I used... I shouldn't have opted out from showing my 'address' - could have led to some free pizzas for someone ;-)bhoytony wrote:Really nice first post. I find it very suspicious that new poster turns up out of the blue and starts dumping people's real life info.Magritte wrote:
For the record, Oolon is a "he". On FtB, he links his comments to his website: oolon.co.uk
Redacted by the Fascist Tit.
Now I think oolon is a slimy turd, but there is no need for this bollocks.
Me quoting you is exactly what you deserve for your slimy and dishonest "misquoting" of the rest of us.
I don't, however, agree with doxxing people - even lying toadies like yourself. :P
Last edited by Lsuoma on Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Missed taking out PII when this was first posted.
Reason: Missed taking out PII when this was first posted.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I have known this for some time now. The question is why would you post that here? Somehow I doubt that anyone here is interested in calling him or showing up at his doorstep.Magritte wrote:I, Magritte, am truly sorry for this, and acknowledge a HUGE penis, as large as - or larger than - that of Alfie Noakes, growing out of the centre of my forehead. This is true. Love, Magritte.Spence wrote:Oolon is certainly most dishonest about how s/he goes about arguing.
BTW people, my reason for taking oolon as he appears to be, is because I once visited his site and read some of his material there. Unless he is trolling even his own blog, he does appear to me to be exactly how he portrays himself here and in other places.
Of course this could be the Aspie aspect of my personality, but so far I have not seen anything to indicate that he is anything else. Think of the thief that is convinced that everyone is exactly like him. Everyone does it, they just have not been caught at it, people who decry thieving are just being hypocrites.
In my view, oolon is operating from a similar set of premises. He really is projecting his racism, sexism, and homophobia onto everyone else. You are never going to convince him otherwise because he knows better. Everyone is like him, they just hide it better.
YMMV
Edited to remove pseudo-doxxing left in quote.
Last edited by Lsuoma on Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Edited to remove pseudo-doxxing left in quote.
Reason: Edited to remove pseudo-doxxing left in quote.
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Deleting or editing someone else's post was the very thing that I couldn't figure out how to do last time. I saw a scary button in there too, somewhere among my explorations. It's said something like 'delete entire thread'. I screamed (inside my head), picturing horrible scenes of pressing the wrong buttons, and ran. Didn't stop running until I exited the administration panel. I just can't handle it. Total wimp out. I used to know my way around a much older version of this software, but that looked all different and has mostly been forgotten in some inaccessible area of my brain. I'll get friendly with BBCodes, but not the administration panel. Yikes!!! :shock:Gumby wrote:You coulda taken care of it, if you hadn't chickened out, ya weenie :)Scented Nectar wrote:Is there a mod in the house? :shock:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I see from my Twitter feed that Renee Hendricks is lurking about. Sign up!!! You'll like it here.
-
- .
- Posts: 5357
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
For completeness' sake, an update: my post in the Lousy Canuck "Matt...apologize" discussion was approved for posting, apparently within the past hour.
My prior assumption that it had been shit-canned was in error. That, or it had been shit-canned but then was pulled back out and rinsed off a bit.
My prior assumption that it had been shit-canned was in error. That, or it had been shit-canned but then was pulled back out and rinsed off a bit.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
A slimy turd?AndrewV69 wrote: BTW people, my reason for taking oolon as he appears to be, is because I once visited his site and read some of his material there. Unless he is trolling even his own blog, he does appear to me to be exactly how he portrays himself here and in other places.
-
- .
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:48 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Fair enuff agree to disagree. Although I would too, those fucking Bruce's really piss me off. (Hope this isn't too racist for MKG)Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:(Sorry MKG and other anti-Oolons, I'd like to respond)oolon** wrote:Hehe is this not feeding the troll? I'd like to know why it is not reasonable given at least for the first two making any statement like that by a public figure (In the UK) would result in serious censure and resignations etc. Actually in the UK the third would result in accusations of sexism regardless of the insistence here that 'no one' in the UK thinks of c*nt as sexist!Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Utter bulshit.1. Say a black person is a n*gger in a context where that person is being disparaged then racism is a reasonable assumption
2. Say a gay person is a f*ggot in a context where that person is being disparaged then homophobia is a reasonable assumption
3. Say a female person is a c*nt in a context where that person is being disparaged then misogyny is a reasonable assumption
A citation for Dick and the Uk'ers who say 'no one' in the UK sees the word this way
http://www.thefword.org.uk/features/200 ... oo_for_who
The thing is, from my own point of view, I'm not going to call a white person, whether they be male or female, gay or cis or trans, a nigger. I won't call a woman a faggot. I won't call a Scottish fisherman a rightful Dolly (whatever that is, I just made it up).
But I will call Bruce, the 6.5" white, cis-gendered, very heterosexual disco bouncer a cunt if he acts as such (being a fucking ass).
My view, and the end of this particular discussion for me. Bande de cons!
-
- .
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 am
- Location: Kent, WA
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
:dance: Yep - ya caught me [delurk]Gumby wrote:I see from my Twitter feed that Renee Hendricks is lurking about. Sign up!!! You'll like it here.
I'm trying to motivate myself to go through all 160-some odd pages of this thread. I think I need a drink.
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
It also is bait for complaints to the webhost about privacy violations, and of course big dramatics with claims we're docdropping even when it's technically something public already.Dick Strawkins wrote:Can an admin get rid of oolons docs (and that link that someone posted to Surly Amy's surlynamic registration.)
I'd prefer if we had some basic rule here about not doxxing people.
That's FTB style activity - we really don't want to sink to that level.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
If I were a mod, I could go along with that, and give the new poster one more chance - although it seems inconceivable that in this day and age, and with knowledge of FTB and the Pit and all the talk against doc-dropping, that this was an innocent "whoopsie" on the part of the new poster.Tigzy wrote:Rather than ban, why not just replace the personal details of a doxxing post with asterisks - but keep the essential content (such as it is) of the post there? Seems a fair compromise to me.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I second this option, if votes are being counted that is.Tigzy wrote:Rather than ban, why not just replace the personal details of a doxxing post with asterisks - but keep the essential content (such as it is) of the post there? Seems a fair compromise to me.
In other news, Joe addresses Lousy Canuck
[youtube]7zVmdJwCTn0[/youtube]
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Welcome!! Great to see you here. When you get done catching up on this thread, there will be a comprehensive test, so read carefully. :dance:ReneeHendricks wrote::dance: Yep - ya caught me [delurk]Gumby wrote:I see from my Twitter feed that Renee Hendricks is lurking about. Sign up!!! You'll like it here.
I'm trying to motivate myself to go through all 160-some odd pages of this thread. I think I need a drink.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Just put oolon on ignore and you'll lose about 60 pages of him asking exactly the same questions over and over again.ReneeHendricks wrote::dance: Yep - ya caught me [delurk]Gumby wrote:I see from my Twitter feed that Renee Hendricks is lurking about. Sign up!!! You'll like it here.
I'm trying to motivate myself to go through all 160-some odd pages of this thread. I think I need a drink.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Yes, this could be a setup.Scented Nectar wrote:It also is bait for complaints to the webhost about privacy violations, and of course big dramatics with claims we're docdropping even when it's technically something public already.Dick Strawkins wrote:Can an admin get rid of oolons docs (and that link that someone posted to Surly Amy's surlynamic registration.)
I'd prefer if we had some basic rule here about not doxxing people.
That's FTB style activity - we really don't want to sink to that level.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Goddammit I hate this:
Fucks me up constantly.Post review
At least one new post has been made to this topic. You may wish to review your post in light of this.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Hey Magritte, we can see you lurking. Why not explain yourself.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Ummmm. Well I thought it was supposed to be ironic or something like that.bhoytony wrote:A slimy turd?AndrewV69 wrote: BTW people, my reason for taking oolon as he appears to be, is because I once visited his site and read some of his material there. Unless he is trolling even his own blog, he does appear to me to be exactly how he portrays himself here and in other places.
Anyway, remember oolon was born that way. What he can do perhaps is do some honest introspection. I suspect that might help, and why I keep suggesting it to him.
I know others disagree, but I think he is on the level, not trolling, just incapable of seeing.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Well TBH I'm feeling shitty for my error of judgement. I trust Lsuoma to do what's best.bhoytony wrote:Hey Magritte, we can see you lurking. Why not explain yourself.
Sorry to all of you -- and especially oolon -- for my indiscretion.
I do hope oolon appreciates how those here who he doesn't show much respect for leapt to defend him. Would the same thing have happened at FtB and the tables had been turned?
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Joe's making some decent points. He's also apparently smoking some decent shit.Saint N. wrote: In other news, Joe addresses Lousy Canuck
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Dilahunty social experiment take 2?Magritte wrote:Well TBH I'm feeling shitty for my error of judgement. I trust Lsuoma to do what's best.bhoytony wrote:Hey Magritte, we can see you lurking. Why not explain yourself.
Sorry to all of you -- and especially oolon -- for my indiscretion.
I do hope oolon appreciates how those here who he doesn't show much respect for leapt to defend him. Would the same thing have happened at FtB and the tables had been turned?
-
- .
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
http://i.imgur.com/dnpKR.jpgBTW people, my reason for taking oolon as he appears to be, is because I once visited his site and read some of his material there. Unless he is trolling even his own blog, he does appear to me to be exactly how he portrays himself here and in other places.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I've said it many times. Copyright infringement is stealing like taking someone's photograph is kidnapping.Tfoot wrote: 1) copyright infringement IS NOT THEFT OR STEALING, in the same way arson IS NOT THEFT. They are different forms of illegal activity.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Probably yes. I remember when the Pappa rape joke furore happened, someone dropped Pappa's docs on an FfTB forum. It was roundly condemned by the FfTB commentariat and the post was soon excised.Magritte wrote:Well TBH I'm feeling shitty for my error of judgement. I trust Lsuoma to do what's best.bhoytony wrote:Hey Magritte, we can see you lurking. Why not explain yourself.
Sorry to all of you -- and especially oolon -- for my indiscretion.
I do hope oolon appreciates how those here who he doesn't show much respect for leapt to defend him. Would the same thing have happened at FtB and the tables had been turned?
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I'm not Matt Dillahunty, I'm a very naughty boy.Fliss wrote:Dilahunty social experiment take 2?Magritte wrote:Well TBH I'm feeling shitty for my error of judgement. I trust Lsuoma to do what's best.bhoytony wrote:Hey Magritte, we can see you lurking. Why not explain yourself.
Sorry to all of you -- and especially oolon -- for my indiscretion.
I do hope oolon appreciates how those here who he doesn't show much respect for leapt to defend him. Would the same thing have happened at FtB and the tables had been turned?
(avatar inverted out of shame)
-
- .
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:48 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Ha! Fucking brilliant! Dick, you didn't understand a thing I said did you? I said in a specific context cunt is insulting FFS! Reading comprehension not your strong point. I suppose you cannot tell the difference from text in "quotes" and text not in quotes so I shouldn't be surprised.Dick Strawkins wrote: Did anyone else read the post oolon linked?
Not only does it fail to make the point he suggests, it makes the opposite point. We have a UK feminist saying that cunt shouldnt be seen as taboo!
By the way, nice try at shifting the goalposts. I'm not saying that NOBODY in the UK thinks like that - there's bound to be some as it seems to be an idea that many radical feminists hold (as opposed to mainstream UK feminists - like the one in your link)
Can't we get a better troll?
From that link.
So yeah calling a man a dick is derogatory for the reasons she states, same reasons for cunt and a woman.Oolons Feminist Link wrote: Context is everything - to describe a penis as a dick is a statement of fact; to describe an entire human being as a dick is derogatory simply because it implies there is nothing more than that to them as a person. Why can't the same analysis apply to 'cunt'?
Is that simple enough for you to understand now? I'm happy to say this for example... Dick Strawkins is the stupidest cunt I've seen on this board. (Assuming you are male... Oops! Hence I rarely use this insult on the internet)
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Hahahahhahahaah, although maybe in need of a trigger warning. :DDick Strawkins wrote:http://i.imgur.com/dnpKR.jpg
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
The maniacal laughter is a dead give away for that, isn't it :DGumby wrote:Joe's making some decent points. He's also apparently smoking some decent shit.Saint N. wrote: In other news, Joe addresses Lousy Canuck
This is why I oppose the call for immediate banning. Removing the personal info out of the comment does a better job of dealing with a possible lapse in judgement. If the problem persists and becomes a recurring issue, then we can talk about harsher penalties.Magritte wrote:Well TBH I'm feeling shitty for my error of judgement. I trust Lsuoma to do what's best.
Sorry to all of you -- and especially oolon -- for my indiscretion.
-
- .
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Of course you aren't. You're a fucking baboon!oolon** wrote:Ugh I hate to point it out but I have no idea what this one is... I have seen the Rebecca 'doc drop' and was not impressed.welch wrote:Of fucking course he won't. It's only bad when the others do it.CommanderTuvok wrote:Oolon STILL can't bring himself to "address" Surly Amy's doc-drop of ElevatorGATE. Mind you, all of the Baboons are brushing that under the carpet.
What a hypocritical cunt.
That's because you are a clueless twat.I thought ElevatorGate was 'franc' Ivan the Terrible Ivanoff?
:lol:
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Hello there NotDillahunty. The shame feeling will wear off soon. Other people's barks about us are a lot worse than our bites. :)Magritte wrote:I'm not Matt Dillahunty, I'm a very naughty boy.
(avatar inverted out of shame)