Periodic Table of Swearing
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Mykeru and Reap, tonnes of lulz out of the podcast, thank you.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
You are fretting too much.AnonymousCowherd wrote:Viola da Gamba! I always wanted one of those. Had to settle for a cello instead, but the old joke still works "You're not putting that thing between my legs!".DownThunder wrote:Nah, see, music theory is something old white men do. The worst thing you can do is going around knowsplaining to everyone, basking in your privilege. I prefer to reject patriarchal music and get all my knowledge from feminism 101. I make music by walking around with a contact microphone in my vagina.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: I have no clue what you people are talking about. Sometimes I wish I had learned to read music and chord structures.
OMFSM!!! I'm the RW of symphonic metal! FUUUUU...
PS, I am a sock puppet of Mozart/Franc Hoggle. Here is me PUA'ing the bishes:
http://i48.tinypic.com/30crlg3.jpg
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
43 guests. We are popular.
-
- .
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:48 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
LeftSidePositive in usual form:
http://i.imgur.com/YflYg.jpg
"a forum that is frothing with rape and death threats"
"Posting someone's HOME ADDRESS [...] a misogynist action"
More lies about AVFM being a hate site...
tweeting = misogynist action
http://i.imgur.com/YflYg.jpg
"a forum that is frothing with rape and death threats"
"Posting someone's HOME ADDRESS [...] a misogynist action"
More lies about AVFM being a hate site...
tweeting = misogynist action
-
- .
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:48 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
http://i.imgur.com/nFsv0.jpg
unapproved opinion = misogyny
...and here is that podcast by the way: spot the lies!
unapproved opinion = misogyny
...and here is that podcast by the way: spot the lies!
-
- .
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:48 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
http://i.imgur.com/DuZKh.jpg
"their entire agenda is a silencing tactic"
Huh?
That's interesting...especially when bloggers like Ophelia, PZ, Stephanie, etc contribute to a 'call-out culture' and many people are afraid to express dissenting opinions for fear that they will be targets of the next character attack campaign.
http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2 ... rformance/
"their entire agenda is a silencing tactic"
Huh?
That's interesting...especially when bloggers like Ophelia, PZ, Stephanie, etc contribute to a 'call-out culture' and many people are afraid to express dissenting opinions for fear that they will be targets of the next character attack campaign.
http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2 ... rformance/
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
New heights of stellar hypocrisy.
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
justinvacula wrote:http://i.imgur.com/DuZKh.jpg
Says the guy who had a hissy fit over his youtube comments not going the way he wanted them to so deleted them, disabled them and disabled ratings too.
Says the guy who has an online "dungeon" parading the names of all the people he bravely silenced.
Says the guy who has an "unmoderated" thread called the "Thunderdome*" ......Which is incidentally quite heavily moderated.
*One of the most unintentionally lulzy names I've ever come across. Comparable to declaring a sparrow's fart as a hurricane.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Tony Parsehole wrote:justinvacula wrote:http://i.imgur.com/DuZKh.jpg
Says the guy who had a hissy fit over his youtube comments not going the way he wanted them to so deleted them, disabled them and disabled ratings too.
Says the guy who has an online "dungeon" parading the names of all the people he bravely silenced.
Says the guy who has an "unmoderated" thread called the "Thunderdome*" ......Which is incidentally quite heavily moderated.
*One of the most unintentionally lulzy names I've ever come across. Comparable to declaring a sparrow's fart as a hurricane.
Thunderfoot should feature somewhere in that list.
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Aye. I forgot about the Tfoot business. To be honest there is so much blocking and silencing going on over the most trivial shite it's easy to forget even the major episodes.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
More like the Thunderbox...Tony Parsehole wrote:Says the guy who has an "unmoderated" thread called the "Thunderdome*" ......Which is incidentally quite heavily moderated.
*One of the most unintentionally lulzy names I've ever come across. Comparable to declaring a sparrow's fart as a hurricane.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I look forward to the time when P.Z. decides to hole up on a motel, grows his fingernails long, saves his urine in mason jars and watches Ice Station Zebra on a continuous loop.Tony Parsehole wrote:justinvacula wrote:http://i.imgur.com/DuZKh.jpg
Says the guy who had a hissy fit over his youtube comments not going the way he wanted them to so deleted them, disabled them and disabled ratings too.
Says the guy who has an online "dungeon" parading the names of all the people he bravely silenced.
Says the guy who has an "unmoderated" thread called the "Thunderdome*" ......Which is incidentally quite heavily moderated.
*One of the most unintentionally lulzy names I've ever come across. Comparable to declaring a sparrow's fart as a hurricane.
-
- .
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:11 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
[Enter Stage Left]Tony Parsehole wrote:justinvacula wrote:http://i.imgur.com/DuZKh.jpg
Says the guy who had a hissy fit over his youtube comments not going the way he wanted them to so deleted them, disabled them and disabled ratings too.
Says the guy who has an online "dungeon" parading the names of all the people he bravely silenced.
Says the guy who has an "unmoderated" thread called the "Thunderdome*" ......Which is incidentally quite heavily moderated.
*One of the most unintentionally lulzy names I've ever come across. Comparable to declaring a sparrow's fart as a hurricane.
PZ the Pot: By my troth, so verily I say unto thee dear Kettle, thou art black!
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
He's also gone and hidden all the old comment threads at his old scienceblogs blog. He has hidden, or maybe flushed down the memory hole with a delete, the 3 historical ElevatorGate threads. Those are the ones where Dawkins commented and everyone freaked.Tony Parsehole wrote:justinvacula wrote:http://i.imgur.com/DuZKh.jpg
Says the guy who had a hissy fit over his youtube comments not going the way he wanted them to so deleted them, disabled them and disabled ratings too.
Says the guy who has an online "dungeon" parading the names of all the people he bravely silenced.
Says the guy who has an "unmoderated" thread called the "Thunderdome*" ......Which is incidentally quite heavily moderated.
*One of the most unintentionally lulzy names I've ever come across. Comparable to declaring a sparrow's fart as a hurricane.
I have them saved, although I'm not sure if I've got each thread saved at its fullest number of comments though. I would repost them for historical reference, like I did with the older Slimepits, but Pezus would freak out and claim copyright. Well, he'd need a bit of help since it wouldn't be at a place that has a flag button like blogs and youtubes, but eventually he'd claim copyright. Of course, his real beef is his own embarassment over EG. He could have had a lot more paying hits by leaving those comment threads up, but he must be more embarrassed than he is in need of that extra ad income. PZ claimed a while back that he had no idea where his comments went. Uh huh, sure PZ.
Here are the three threads with the now hidden or deleted comments.
1. Where he defends Becky's bullying of a woman, Stef Mcgraw (sp?) in her audience. This is also where Dawkins' first comment (Dear Muslima) appeared.
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011 ... ame-names/
2. The conversation/fight continued here where PZ gives us his PUA advice.
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011 ... ngs-guide/
3. The final thread. Article just bitches at Dawkins. This is also where Dawkins wrote his second and third comments.
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011 ... more-unto/
And here are screencaps of Dawkins comments from the above threads, including the first and kind of famous one.
http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2 ... ntEG-1.png
http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2 ... ntEG-2.png
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2 ... ntEG-3.png
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Re: PZ's latest post on abortion:
Even as an atheist I'm very uncomfortable with the idea of post-viability abortions, though I can understand their necessity in cases where the health of the mother is at risk, or a pregnancy is the result of rape/incest etc. I also understand exceptions past viability for foetuses which show crippling genetic defects, though I can't justify a) why that should only apply to 'defected' foetuses and b) what the criteria are to adjudge something as having 'crippling' defects. Thus, I even struggle to find a defined position from which to argue my own case, but they just feel instinctively wrong to me, even without the whole 'sanctity of life' religious argument.
I'm genuinely interested, does anyone know what the A+ or FtB position is on post-viability abortion? I would ask in the comments section over there, though I imagine I'd just be shouted down as a misogynist for wanting to take away the rights of women to decide. Personally, I'm unashamed of my position on the issue and at that stage I do see the 'rights' of the viable foetus as entering the equation and in some (even many) cases, overriding the rights of the woman.
That's just another unfortunate result of their ever being tenets of an atheist group. I am quite convinced that God is non-existent, but I don't feel that the "socially just" position which results from that has to be one way or the other.
I regularly see this perspective proffered in the abortion debate. I've always considered myself pro-choice because I support the right of women to have abortions before a foetus is viable (or as some laws state, around the 24th week I believe). I thought that was a fairly common pro-choice position, but the more I read, the more confused I get. Is this argument supposed to apply to the entire pregnancy? I haven't read many other posts from FtB discussing this aspect, and I don't see a sentence anywhere defining if that is or is not the case.PZ wrote:Yes, it’s another man pontificating on the rights and privileges of the fetus as if the pregnant woman were not there. It’s astonishing how completely women vanish when they get pregnant — it’s as if some people can only see women as an incubator for the Holy and Sacred Child.
Even as an atheist I'm very uncomfortable with the idea of post-viability abortions, though I can understand their necessity in cases where the health of the mother is at risk, or a pregnancy is the result of rape/incest etc. I also understand exceptions past viability for foetuses which show crippling genetic defects, though I can't justify a) why that should only apply to 'defected' foetuses and b) what the criteria are to adjudge something as having 'crippling' defects. Thus, I even struggle to find a defined position from which to argue my own case, but they just feel instinctively wrong to me, even without the whole 'sanctity of life' religious argument.
I'm genuinely interested, does anyone know what the A+ or FtB position is on post-viability abortion? I would ask in the comments section over there, though I imagine I'd just be shouted down as a misogynist for wanting to take away the rights of women to decide. Personally, I'm unashamed of my position on the issue and at that stage I do see the 'rights' of the viable foetus as entering the equation and in some (even many) cases, overriding the rights of the woman.
That's just another unfortunate result of their ever being tenets of an atheist group. I am quite convinced that God is non-existent, but I don't feel that the "socially just" position which results from that has to be one way or the other.
-
- .
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
It's always amusing to see PZ and Ophelia rattled.
-
- .
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Linky?decius wrote:Mykeru and Reap, tonnes of lulz out of the podcast, thank you.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I don't know if they have an official position, the best I could find was the position of one of the forum members called ImaginationTheory. At least one of the persons there seemed not to agree, so apparently they're allowing some dissent now and then.Guest wrote:Re: PZ's latest post on abortion:
I'm genuinely interested, does anyone know what the A+ or FtB position is on post-viability abortion? I would ask in the comments section over there, though I imagine I'd just be shouted down as a misogynist for wanting to take away the rights of women to decide. Personally, I'm unashamed of my position on the issue and at that stage I do see the 'rights' of the viable foetus as entering the equation and in some (even many) cases, overriding the rights of the woman.
That's just another unfortunate result of their ever being tenets of an atheist group. I am quite convinced that God is non-existent, but I don't feel that the "socially just" position which results from that has to be one way or the other.
Britain - jailed for 4 years (abortion)
http://imageshack.us/a/img521/817/temp1q.th.png
http://imageshack.us/a/img528/233/temp2i.th.png
They also have an interesting thread on a man's right to abdicate parental responsibility. They also have dissenting opinions, maybe some of the members are getting tired of it being an echo chamber :think: ?
-
- .
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:48 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... at-you-do/
Unless, of course, you are one of these activists and we happen to start a character assassination campaign against you and villify the organization which enlisted you.So if you’re one of the people who are actively involved in the day-to-day operation of our movements–you run activities or groups, lobby, speak, investigate, research, write, edit, design, and all the other things that keep us functioning–you’re doing work that desperately needs to be done. Moreover, you’re doing work that I can’t do. I don’t have your skills, or I don’t have the time your projects require, or I don’t have the temperament that would allow me to keep at your work over the long haul.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I couldn't believe all the crap Dawkins took for making a very reasonable point. Rebecca, was propositioned (according to her anyway), in an elevator in Dublin. She said no. Nothing happened after that.
All Dawkins did was say that this is nothing compared to what women, Muslim women in particular have to deal with every day of their lives. He's excoriated.
I wonder if he has anything to do with the FfTB'ers anymore? I know at one time PZ made a big deal about he and Dawkins being friends (friendly?). Of course now I know it was just to push up his page views.
All Dawkins did was say that this is nothing compared to what women, Muslim women in particular have to deal with every day of their lives. He's excoriated.
I wonder if he has anything to do with the FfTB'ers anymore? I know at one time PZ made a big deal about he and Dawkins being friends (friendly?). Of course now I know it was just to push up his page views.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Dawkins also said it was “zero bad†which isn't nearly the same as saying it pales in comparison to third world problems. Almost everything we deal with pales in comparison to third world problems, so that's not a helpful metric.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
The point being, he eas vilified online for saying something that everyone there should by default have known: nothing happened here. Move on. Quit making a big deal out of absolutely nothing.d4m10n wrote:Dawkins also said it was “zero bad†which isn't nearly the same as saying it pales in comparison to third world problems. Almost everything we deal with pales in comparison to third world problems, so that's not a helpful metric.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
After Atheism Plus came about Dawkins tweeted that we should "boycott blog networks that foment drama for page views" - something along those lines. He also retweeted Lucy Wainwright a few times, leading to the accusation he was engaging in "passive aggression" - although I don't see what's "passive" about it. I think it's pretty clear how he feels about FtB these days.Outwest wrote: I wonder if he has anything to do with the FfTB'ers anymore? I know at one time PZ made a big deal about he and Dawkins being friends (friendly?). Of course now I know it was just to push up his page views.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=labelist
Labelist
An asshole who continuously labels people, regardless of if they actually are that label or not.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
AFIACT Dawkins didn't have a problem with fomenting drama until it became fratricidal.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I havent been on twitter until very recently so I missed that info. I looked at his site to determine if he had written anything about all of this and was unable, at first glance, to find anything.Guest wrote:After Atheism Plus came about Dawkins tweeted that we should "boycott blog networks that foment drama for page views" - something along those lines. He also retweeted Lucy Wainwright a few times, leading to the accusation he was engaging in "passive aggression" - although I don't see what's "passive" about it. I think it's pretty clear how he feels about FtB these days.Outwest wrote: I wonder if he has anything to do with the FfTB'ers anymore? I know at one time PZ made a big deal about he and Dawkins being friends (friendly?). Of course now I know it was just to push up his page views.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
What drama was he fomenting?d4m10n wrote:AFIACT Dawkins didn't have a problem with fomenting drama until it became fratricidal.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
decius wrote:What drama was he fomenting?d4m10n wrote:AFIACT Dawkins didn't have a problem with fomenting drama until it became fratricidal.
Precisely none. The "drama" was coming from FftB/Skepchick about poor Becky having to endure 8 seconds in an elevator at 4 a.m.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
That's my view as well. I would like him to justify his statement, in case I missed something.Outwest wrote:decius wrote:What drama was he fomenting?d4m10n wrote:AFIACT Dawkins didn't have a problem with fomenting drama until it became fratricidal.
Precisely none. The "drama" was coming from FftB/Skepchick about poor Becky having to endure 8 seconds in an elevator at 4 a.m.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Just read that thread you linked. Have to say, what some of these people are advocating is just horrific. There's at least one guy there saying abortion should be allowed up to full term as the woman's bodily autonomy outweighs the rights of the child. That's FULL TERM - right up to due date. Can they actually imagine what that would entail? Dashing a full term baby's brains out? I'd like to see any of them face up to something like that in real life. I'm no religious moralist but I have no problem calling this murder. If they're trying to give the anti abortion crowd ammunition they're going the right way about it.Altair wrote:I don't know if they have an official position, the best I could find was the position of one of the forum members called ImaginationTheory. At least one of the persons there seemed not to agree, so apparently they're allowing some dissent now and then.Guest wrote:Re: PZ's latest post on abortion:
I'm genuinely interested, does anyone know what the A+ or FtB position is on post-viability abortion? I would ask in the comments section over there, though I imagine I'd just be shouted down as a misogynist for wanting to take away the rights of women to decide. Personally, I'm unashamed of my position on the issue and at that stage I do see the 'rights' of the viable foetus as entering the equation and in some (even many) cases, overriding the rights of the woman.
That's just another unfortunate result of their ever being tenets of an atheist group. I am quite convinced that God is non-existent, but I don't feel that the "socially just" position which results from that has to be one way or the other.
Britain - jailed for 4 years (abortion)
http://imageshack.us/a/img521/817/temp1q.th.png
http://imageshack.us/a/img528/233/temp2i.th.png
They also have an interesting thread on a man's right to abdicate parental responsibility. They also have dissenting opinions, maybe some of the members are getting tired of it being an echo chamber :think: ?
-
- .
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
- Location: Peachtree City, GA
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
So, I put an appropriate warning on my latest blog post:
http://alstefanelli.files.wordpress.com ... rigger.png
http://alstefanelli.files.wordpress.com ... rigger.png
-
- .
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:59 am
- Location: In a band of brigands.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
The Guardian article is a typical load of Grauniad bollocks, in that it sets out to defend the indefensible. Yes, there's a problem with our (UK) legal system sending people to jail in circumstances which offers only harm to the criminal and no benefit to society. Sarah Catt however, makes a lousy example. She is a stupid selfish person who got into a mess that could have been resolved in several ways at various stages, but who chose to commit an especially vile and stupid act instead. If prison is going to be used at all, Catt strikes me as a legitimate candidate for it.Altair wrote:I don't know if they have an official position, the best I could find was the position of one of the forum members called ImaginationTheory. At least one of the persons there seemed not to agree, so apparently they're allowing some dissent now and then.
Britain - jailed for 4 years (abortion)
They also have an interesting thread on a man's right to abdicate parental responsibility. They also have dissenting opinions, maybe some of the members are getting tired of it being an echo chamber :think: ?
Imagination Theory, over on A+ is also making a potentially valid point - women should have control over their bodies - but again, Catt makes a lousy example. If bodily autonomy is going to be taken so far that her case is acceptable, then there can be no restrictions on abortion at all.
The line is horribly hard to draw, as we all know. There are the Fundies arguing that 'once spermatozoon meets ovum, that's a person' at one extreme and Catt's (probable) infanticide at the other. I think most people would argue that the line is somewhere between these extremities. I certainly don't find either one to be reasonable.
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
And you did well to do so. WTF happened to the US since I last was there?!? (1996)Al Stefanelli wrote:So, I put an appropriate warning on my latest blog post:
http://alstefanelli.files.wordpress.com ... rigger.png
-
- .
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
There was also Dawkins defence of Paula Kirby. Dawkins is obviously too busy and too important to care about FfTB, and sees them as a minor irritation. He recognises that the Baboons are not representative of the Atheism/Skeptic movement, and not even representatitive of humanism or feminism, either. Because of that, he can merrilly ignore and occasionally pwn them in a subtle tweet.
I remember Stefunny suggesting "the pushback was getting him down", gleefully referring to the Baboon's constant badgering of Dawkins, but I reckon Dawkins could not care less, and judging by the amount of whaling and gnashing of teeth over at FfTB and Skepchick, it is they who are "getting down from the pushback".
The difference is, pushback towards the Baboons is considered "misogyny", "hatred of women", "cyberstalking", etc. Pushback towards Dawkins is considered fair game.
I remember Stefunny suggesting "the pushback was getting him down", gleefully referring to the Baboon's constant badgering of Dawkins, but I reckon Dawkins could not care less, and judging by the amount of whaling and gnashing of teeth over at FfTB and Skepchick, it is they who are "getting down from the pushback".
The difference is, pushback towards the Baboons is considered "misogyny", "hatred of women", "cyberstalking", etc. Pushback towards Dawkins is considered fair game.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Thats pretty good actually. Must be pretty disapointing for people who actually check themselves though.justinvacula wrote:LeftSidePositive in usual form:
[img
"a forum that is frothing with rape and death threats"
"Posting someone's HOME ADDRESS [...] a misogynist action"
More lies about AVFM being a hate site...
tweeting = misogynist action
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I believe that Dawkins, in general, is too busy to worry about these gnats that buzz about to the annoyance of everyone. And that's all they really are, gnats.
None of the people we've been discussing has done a thing, from what I can tell, to advance secularism or atheism. All they do is sit behind their screens (hmmmm... :doh:), and criticize those, like Justin Vacula, that are actually involved in activism.
None of the people we've been discussing has done a thing, from what I can tell, to advance secularism or atheism. All they do is sit behind their screens (hmmmm... :doh:), and criticize those, like Justin Vacula, that are actually involved in activism.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
That's an interesting one. On the one hand the claim of third degree assault seems spurious at best, but on the other there is reference to a "first victim." It could be that something happened in that incident that was more serious. Do you have any detail about that?
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Although I'd like to see the back story on this it doesn't matter if there have been 600 rapes on Campus and the guy fits the description of the prime suspect. It doesn't matter because the woman in the report IS NOT A VICTIM. Asking somebody "do I know you?" IS NOT ASSAULT.
I don't care if the guy is seven feet tall with a scarred face, tattoos on his forehead and a voice like a cave troll. I don't care if the woman in question literally shit herself in terror at the man's appearance, asking a question is not assault and the woman is not a victim of assault simply because "she felt threatened".
Where did you find that BTW?
-
- .
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Guys. Don't do that! :hand:
On a serious note, it sounds a bit creepy to me, especially the fact that there seems to be more than one incident.
I wouldn't describe it as assault but it is certainly bordering on harrassment or threatening behavior and is likely to make people wary of being alone in those places.
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
This might be the previous incident? This seem to be the original, considering they are from the same date and seem to describe the same person. It seems the incidents lead to an arrest:Jonathan wrote:That's an interesting one. On the one hand the claim of third degree assault seems spurious at best, but on the other there is reference to a "first victim." It could be that something happened in that incident that was more serious. Do you have any detail about that?
Clery report + Columbia Tribune article
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Steers, oh my Steers:
I haven't heard from you about my answer to your query WRT "nigger" vs "cunt". http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... ger#p23965
This isn't baiting or anything, I'd just like to have your opinion on my train of thought. Checking myself, sort of...
I haven't heard from you about my answer to your query WRT "nigger" vs "cunt". http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... ger#p23965
This isn't baiting or anything, I'd just like to have your opinion on my train of thought. Checking myself, sort of...
-
- .
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Just another anagram, folks. Nothing to see here. I was bored this morning. Move along. But if you do watch it, it's nicer at full screen and high resolution.
[youtube]iA800PmWUwU[/youtube]
[youtube]iA800PmWUwU[/youtube]
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Hmm. The circumstances of the first incident get me suspicious, possible that he was trying to repeat it somehow the second time. Still baffled as to how the second time constituted third degree assault when there was no contact.acathode wrote:This might be the previous incident? This seem to be the original, considering they are from the same date and seem to describe the same person. It seems the incidents lead to an arrest:Jonathan wrote:That's an interesting one. On the one hand the claim of third degree assault seems spurious at best, but on the other there is reference to a "first victim." It could be that something happened in that incident that was more serious. Do you have any detail about that?
Clery report + Columbia Tribune article
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I bet you kick arse in Scrabble!Scented Nectar wrote:Just another anagram, folks. Nothing to see here. I was bored this morning. Move along. But if you do watch it, it's nicer at full screen and high resolution.
[youtube]iA800PmWUwU[/youtube]
-
- .
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:02 am
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
You missed "posted something at the SlymePit" but it's hilarious all the same! Well done! Now we can have our own argumentum ad bingo fallacies!
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Can someone explain what the JAQ in "JAQing off" refers to?
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
"Just Asking Questions"Jonathan wrote:Can someone explain what the JAQ in "JAQing off" refers to?
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
HA! Sceptics who turn the idea of asking questions into an insult. :doh:Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:"Just Asking Questions"Jonathan wrote:Can someone explain what the JAQ in "JAQing off" refers to?
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I've said it many times. How the fuck can a sceptic dislike people asking questions????Jonathan wrote:HA! Sceptics who turn the idea of asking questions into an insult. :doh:Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:"Just Asking Questions"Jonathan wrote:Can someone explain what the JAQ in "JAQing off" refers to?
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
I like it!AnimalAndy wrote:Anything missing?
I was going to suggest 'splaining and other variants, but there's just so many, you'd need a separate card.
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Yup. To be fair, there might be a pattern in certain internet trolls "just asking questions". But I have to wonder what is the best response:Jonathan wrote:HA! Sceptics who turn the idea of asking questions into an insult. :doh:Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:"Just Asking Questions"Jonathan wrote:Can someone explain what the JAQ in "JAQing off" refers to?
-Telling them they're "JAQing off", thus feeding the troll.
-Answering the bloody questions, thus maybe feeding the troll, but also most probably informing the onlookers as to what one's view is.
Guess what they prefer...
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Via Coyne:Al Stefanelli wrote:So, I put an appropriate warning on my latest blog post:
http://alstefanelli.files.wordpress.com ... rigger.png
http://whyevolutionistrue.files.wordpre ... jpeg?w=550
-
- .
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:02 am
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
So close!Tony Parsehole wrote:Here's mine:
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8188/8138 ... b6b2f7.jpg
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
It's gonna be a few days before we can have a bingo. "Soft Trolling" is pretty new and needs to get its stride.AnimalAndy wrote:So close!Tony Parsehole wrote:Here's mine:
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8188/8138 ... b6b2f7.jpg
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Battery requires contact. Assault can best be described as an attempt to commit battery.Jonathan wrote:Hmm. The circumstances of the first incident get me suspicious, possible that he was trying to repeat it somehow the second time. Still baffled as to how the second time constituted third degree assault when there was no contact.acathode wrote:This might be the previous incident? This seem to be the original, considering they are from the same date and seem to describe the same person. It seems the incidents lead to an arrest:Jonathan wrote:That's an interesting one. On the one hand the claim of third degree assault seems spurious at best, but on the other there is reference to a "first victim." It could be that something happened in that incident that was more serious. Do you have any detail about that?
Clery report + Columbia Tribune article
Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
mikelf unplugged wrote:Battery requires contact. Assault can best be described as an attempt to commit battery.Jonathan wrote:Hmm. The circumstances of the first incident get me suspicious, possible that he was trying to repeat it somehow the second time. Still baffled as to how the second time constituted third degree assault when there was no contact.acathode wrote:This might be the previous incident? This seem to be the original, considering they are from the same date and seem to describe the same person. It seems the incidents lead to an arrest:Jonathan wrote:That's an interesting one. On the one hand the claim of third degree assault seems spurious at best, but on the other there is reference to a "first victim." It could be that something happened in that incident that was more serious. Do you have any detail about that?
Clery report + Columbia Tribune article
Atually "simple assault" can just be a threat, as in "I'm gonna beat you to a pulp".