Demanding consistency about one's principles is intellectually elitist. Noted.Brive1987 wrote: ↑My working hypothesis is that all this anger comes from your intellectual elitism. That the girls should back away from these weighty matter of mind and leave them to the experts.Kirbmarc wrote: ↑ My criticism of Southern or Goldy or Hopkins is that they're shit-stirring clickbait-mongers who deliberately seek out "edgy" opinions and nuclear hot takes to get attention, while then complaining about everyone hates them and abuses them, or violates their rights, even though they're quickly ready to throw away their alleged principles when it comes to facing regimes which routinely violate the values they claim to support.
Just like Becky Watson or Amanda Marcotte. At least Southern and Goldy are good looking. Hopkins isn't even that. :bjarte:
Is the entry ticket to the bleachers a subscription to JSTOR?
There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
We've all made fun of PeeZee for his hypocrisy about "believing the victims" while being the one who "zoomed" and was concerned about his career when he was the one accused of sexual harassment.
I guess the Pit is a haven for intellectual elitists.
I guess the Pit is a haven for intellectual elitists.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Incidentally Dugin shares a lot of the idea with the SocJus:
-they both believe that collective identity trumps individual rights
-they both see those who, according to some criteria, should be part of the collective but refuse to as "traitors"
-they both support the isolation and purification of the cultural collectives, and despise cultural mixing
-they both support shared narratives of victimhood and of empowerment, according to which the victimhood or empowerment of some people who belong to your "collective" are a common features of the members of the "collective".
The big difference between the two is the polarity of their morals: Dugin sees "white identity" (well, Russian identity, but he's willing to be open to a truce with other "white" collectives) as the Sacred Traditions which Must Be Defended, while the SocJus see "whiteness" as the Root of All Evils.
-they both believe that collective identity trumps individual rights
-they both see those who, according to some criteria, should be part of the collective but refuse to as "traitors"
-they both support the isolation and purification of the cultural collectives, and despise cultural mixing
-they both support shared narratives of victimhood and of empowerment, according to which the victimhood or empowerment of some people who belong to your "collective" are a common features of the members of the "collective".
The big difference between the two is the polarity of their morals: Dugin sees "white identity" (well, Russian identity, but he's willing to be open to a truce with other "white" collectives) as the Sacred Traditions which Must Be Defended, while the SocJus see "whiteness" as the Root of All Evils.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
I guess the difference is that one supports this:Kirbmarc wrote: ↑ Incidentally Dugin shares a lot of the idea with the SocJus:
-they both believe that collective identity trumps individual rights
-they both see those who, according to some criteria, should be part of the collective but refuse to as "traitors"
-they both support the isolation and purification of the cultural collectives, and despise cultural mixing
-they both support shared narratives of victimhood and of empowerment, according to which the victimhood or empowerment of some people who belong to your "collective" are a common features of the members of the "collective".
The big difference between the two is the polarity of their morals: Dugin sees "white identity" (well, Russian identity, but he's willing to be open to a truce with other "white" collectives) as the Sacred Traditions which Must Be Defended, while the SocJus see "whiteness" as the Root of All Evils.
The other aims for this:
Other than that, two peas in a pod.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
I don't know if it's been raised before here, but someone just mentioned to me (I was explaining Elevator gate) that maybe the reason Jordan Peterson rose so fucking fast is because the market for atheism and skepticism died with Elevatorgate, and those pundits had to go somewhere.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
I know Vox Day and Millennial Woes (ie Alt-Right or AR-Adjacent commentators) see the 'You Tube Skeptics' as the inheritors of the 'New Atheists' and that they have lately morphed into Petersonites. [Although there appears to have been another (kindler, gentler) schism into a P and non-P crowd].
It may also be that the online world is not the be-all and end-all and there could also have been other factors at play. eg the novelty wearing off, or the rise of real world stuff (Trump & ISIS) turning everyone into political pundits.
Fuck It - A Venn diagram or Flow Chart of these groups would look like a Jackson Pollock.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
MSM roll into the Singaporean press room.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
And predictable responses
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
The US has a long history of dealing with dictators like Saddam Hussein, Colonel Gadaffi, Assad.
It is almost as though Trump has learned nothing about how to deal with dictators.
It is almost as though Trump has learned nothing about how to deal with dictators.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Sounds very Dugin-esque. Seperate and colliding view points.Standpoint feminism makes the case that, because women's lives and roles in almost all societies are significantly different from men's, women hold a different type of knowledge. Their location as a subordinated group allows women to see and understand the world in ways that are different and challenging to the existing male-biased conventional wisdom.[7]
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Both bullshit, yes. Also, as I've pointed out before, THIS is the foundation of SocJus memes like "women's way of knowing" (the "different type of knowledge") or "mansplaining" (men lacking the "different type of knowledge" and acting according to their male biases) or "lived experience" (another way to say a "different kind of knowledge") or "believe the victims" (the "different type of knowledge" allows women to detect a rapist even when men cannot).Brive1987 wrote: ↑Sounds very Dugin-esque. Seperate and colliding view points.Standpoint feminism makes the case that, because women's lives and roles in almost all societies are significantly different from men's, women hold a different type of knowledge. Their location as a subordinated group allows women to see and understand the world in ways that are different and challenging to the existing male-biased conventional wisdom.[7]
Hell, the "feminist glaciology" paper that we've all mocked is based on the idea that women (and indigenous groups) have a different type of knowledge, which they apply to glaciers, but which is no less "right" or "wrong" than White Male Science.
Applying the same standpoint theory to race you get things like "stay in your lane" (different races also have "different kinds of knowledge", so you cannot ever understand certain things if you're not black/asian/native american) or "whitesplaining".
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
I'm surprised that Dugin hasn't already claimed that Putin isn't a dictator, it's arrogant Westerners who "Westsplain" Russia.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
North Korea will never give up its nuclear weapons. The survival of its regime is hitched on the nukes. The best Trump (or anyone else, for that matter) can do is come to a compromise about no FURTHER nuclear tests or attacks on South Korea in exchange for something (food? less military pressure from the US?).
IF Trump can pull it off it'd be a good thing (although the Norks could easily exploit some loopholes, so it'd be a mistake to believe this is "lasting peace"). But I doubt it. John Bolton won't allow this, and Trump listens to him.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
North Korea pursued nuclear technology simply because Kim Jong Un doesn't want to end up like Gaddafi or Saddam. In the long term they hope to "Finlandize" South Korea, so to reduce any risk of an American invasion of North Korea.
An intervention would be a humanitarian disaster, so the US should thread wisely, but this doesn't mean that there can be any talks of "peace" or "reunification" anytime soon. The Norks are still what they are, a totalitarian "necrocracy" of the Un dynasty. This isn't like the reunification of East and West Germany.
An intervention would be a humanitarian disaster, so the US should thread wisely, but this doesn't mean that there can be any talks of "peace" or "reunification" anytime soon. The Norks are still what they are, a totalitarian "necrocracy" of the Un dynasty. This isn't like the reunification of East and West Germany.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Kirbmarc wrote: ↑Both bullshit, yes. Also, as I've pointed out before, THIS is the foundation of SocJus memes like "women's way of knowing" (the "different type of knowledge") or "mansplaining" (men lacking the "different type of knowledge" and acting according to their male biases) or "lived experience" (another way to say a "different kind of knowledge") or "believe the victims" (the "different type of knowledge" allows women to detect a rapist even when men cannot).Brive1987 wrote: ↑Sounds very Dugin-esque. Seperate and colliding view points.Standpoint feminism makes the case that, because women's lives and roles in almost all societies are significantly different from men's, women hold a different type of knowledge. Their location as a subordinated group allows women to see and understand the world in ways that are different and challenging to the existing male-biased conventional wisdom.[7]
Hell, the "feminist glaciology" paper that we've all mocked is based on the idea that women (and indigenous groups) have a different type of knowledge, which they apply to glaciers, but which is no less "right" or "wrong" than White Male Science.
Applying the same standpoint theory to race you get things like "stay in your lane" (different races also have "different kinds of knowledge", so you cannot ever understand certain things if you're not black/asian/native american) or "whitesplaining".
There is no question women see the world in a completely different way.Person A approaches a building and enters it unproblematically. As she approaches she sees something perfectly familiar which, if asked, she might call ‘The Entrance’. Person X approaches the same building and sees a great stack of stairs and the glaring lack of a ramp for her wheelchair. [1994: 424]
The experience of person A is of the entrance to a building. Whereas the experience of person X is of a barrier to entrance and (at best) an inconvenience. Person X’s social location—qua person with a disability—means that the building presents differently to her from how it does to someone without a disability.
The trick is Dugin wouldn’t let em out of the kitchen - where they can gab all they want. And as all men know ... a door is fucking door, even if you can’t reach it.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Dugin is a postmodern reactionary. I'm glad we agree on that.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
The matter isn't whether people see the world in different ways (which is a banal observation) it's whether those ways are communicable and comparable. I can certainly understand that for someone who's on a wheelchair on a ramp is stairs is a problem. I don't need some secret, esoteric "disabled way of knowing" to understand this, just the ability to put myself in this person's shoes (or chair).Brive1987 wrote: ↑There is no question women see the world in a completely different way.Person A approaches a building and enters it unproblematically. As she approaches she sees something perfectly familiar which, if asked, she might call ‘The Entrance’. Person X approaches the same building and sees a great stack of stairs and the glaring lack of a ramp for her wheelchair. [1994: 424]
The experience of person A is of the entrance to a building. Whereas the experience of person X is of a barrier to entrance and (at best) an inconvenience. Person X’s social location—qua person with a disability—means that the building presents differently to her from how it does to someone without a disability.
The trick is Dugin wouldn’t let em out of the kitchen - where they can gab all they want. And as all men know ... a door is fucking door, even if you can’t reach it.
Non-disabled people can see the lack of a ramp and make it so that there is one, if necessary.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
But could you truly feel the lack of the ramp, could you taste the bitter oppression of a door that is only closed to them, hear the clamour of discordant chaos.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Are those things really important to the decision of building a ramp? Also feelings are communicable to an extent: everyone has experienced frustration and exclusion at some point in their lives. You've not experienced the SPECIFIC frustration of not having access to a building, but again, is the SPECIFIC nature of this frustration really so important?
An epistemology which is based on incommunicable feelings tends to justify a narrative of Perpetual Victimhood, and so double standards and special concessions to "make things equal", or otherwise a completely morally relativistic stance, where "My Truth" is just as valid as "Your Truth". Instead an epistemology based on verifiable facts and common values and principles can justify special treatment only if it's truly necessary to overcome a testable disadvantage, and the idea that the we can come to the only truth there is, or at least a close approximation thereof.
Dugin's epistemology is based on moral relativism: the US can't judge Russia because Russia Is Different, Your Human Rights Don't Apply To Us, and so incarcerating the "traitors of True Russia" is completely legitimate and we can't accept the judgment of the foreigner who Just Doesn't Understand.
It's a clever bit of propaganda. The Salafis have already exploited the SocJus standpoint epistemology to justify sexual slavery, or hijabs, or terrorism, and the Regressive Left has swallowed the bait hook, line and sinker. Dugin knows that in the SocJus hierarchy the white Russians are Oppressors and so Evil, so he hopes to use the postmodern standpoint theory to sucker in the White Identitarians of Generation Identity.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64PKoAiWhjE
The fruits of standpoint epistemology :bjarte:
The fruits of standpoint epistemology :bjarte:
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
If you prefer a real, not satirical example, there's always this:
Outrageous :bjarte:‘The glaciers these women speak of’, explains Cruikshank (2005: 51–3), ‘engage all the senses. [The glaciers] are willful, capricious, easily excited by human intemperance, but equally placated by quick-witted human responses. Proper behavior is deferential. I was warned, for instance, about firm taboos against “cooking with grease” near glaciers that are offended by such smells.…Cooked food, especially fat, might grow into a glacier overnight if improperly handled.’ The narratives Cruikshank collected show how humans and nature are intimately linked, and subsequently demonstrate the capacity of folk glaciologies to diversify the field of glaciology and subvert the hegemony of natural sciences.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Britain imposes severe restrictions on reporting of Muslim child rape gang trials.
But there is no problem in reporting any case involving white people ,even if they never actually caused any physical harm to anybody https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44452529
But there is no problem in reporting any case involving white people ,even if they never actually caused any physical harm to anybody https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44452529
-
- .
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:26 am
- Location: England, a bastion of barbarism and cluelessness
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Germany to consider 'educational state-funded feminist pornography' to combat sexist stereotypes
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... types.html
German feminist porn. I can't wait.
.In the proposed feminist porn there will be fat, skinny, young and old people
So, just like regular porn, then?
From the comments:
:lol:I expect the feminist versions will contain up to 5 times more moaning.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
SM1957 wrote: ↑But there is no problem in reporting any case involving white people ,even if they never actually caused any physical harm to anybody https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44452529
So they didn't actually cause any physical harm.An alleged member of banned far-right group National Action has admitted planning to murder MP Rosie Cooper.
Jack Renshaw, 23, of Skelmersdale, Lancashire, pleaded guilty to preparing an act of terrorism by buying a machete with the intention of killing the Labour MP for West Lancashire...
Mr Atkinson said Renshaw's objective was not only to make a political point, but to revenge himself on those he considered to be persecuting him, namely Lancashire Police in general and Det Con Henderson in particular.
Renshaw had told a National Action meeting in July 2017 that after killing Rosie Cooper, he would take hostages, demand that DC Henderson come to the scene, the prosecution claimed.
"His plan then would be to kill that officer who was, he said, his real target," Mr Atkinson told the court.
They only tried to kill an MP, take hostages and then kill a cop.
But that's not a crime is it? Just like trying to blow up an airplane and your bomb not going off wouldn't be a crime.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Oh, look. MI5 has a whole list of people who didn't do nuffink wrong:
https://www.mi5.gov.uk/attack-plots-in-the-uk
https://www.mi5.gov.uk/attack-plots-in-the-uk
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Plotting is a crime.... That is why they are on trial. You can read all about it on the BBC because there are no reporting restrictions. If they had been part of a Muslim rape gang raping children, you would now be in jail, accused of setting people free by saying what they were doing.Shatterface wrote: ↑SM1957 wrote: ↑But there is no problem in reporting any case involving white people ,even if they never actually caused any physical harm to anybody https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44452529So they didn't actually cause any physical harm.An alleged member of banned far-right group National Action has admitted planning to murder MP Rosie Cooper.
Jack Renshaw, 23, of Skelmersdale, Lancashire, pleaded guilty to preparing an act of terrorism by buying a machete with the intention of killing the Labour MP for West Lancashire...
Mr Atkinson said Renshaw's objective was not only to make a political point, but to revenge himself on those he considered to be persecuting him, namely Lancashire Police in general and Det Con Henderson in particular.
Renshaw had told a National Action meeting in July 2017 that after killing Rosie Cooper, he would take hostages, demand that DC Henderson come to the scene, the prosecution claimed.
"His plan then would be to kill that officer who was, he said, his real target," Mr Atkinson told the court.
They only tried to kill an MP, take hostages and then kill a cop.
But that's not a crime is it? Just like trying to blow up an airplane and your bomb not going off wouldn't be a crime.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Remember when the Google memo came out and the SJWs insisted Damore was taking about absolute differences, not statistical ones, and that he was saying women are shit at maths? And that we mocked the SJWs for being thick as pig shit because that's not what Damore and his defenders actually believe?
Now we have a Great Russian Thinker claiming that boy brains and girl brains interpret the world in mutually incompatible ways and that women are better off on the kitchen and we have Pitters defending that position.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
It's a bullshit comparison because you didn't compare coverage of a white terrorist plot with a Muslim terrorist plot, of which there have been dozens reported.SM1957 wrote: ↑Plotting is a crime.... That is why they are on trial. You can read all about it on the BBC because there are no reporting restrictions. If they had been part of a Muslim rape gang raping children, you would now be in jail, accused of setting people free by saying what they were doing.
Instead you compared a failed terrorist plot with coverage of child abuse cases which are always subject to reporting restrictions in the U.K.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
I don't recall people going to jail for reporting on the trials of Rolf Harris or Stuart Hall.....Shatterface wrote: ↑It's a bullshit comparison because you didn't compare coverage of a white terrorist plot with a Muslim terrorist plot, of which there have been dozens reported.SM1957 wrote: ↑Plotting is a crime.... That is why they are on trial. You can read all about it on the BBC because there are no reporting restrictions. If they had been part of a Muslim rape gang raping children, you would now be in jail, accused of setting people free by saying what they were doing.
Instead you compared a failed terrorist plot with coverage of child abuse cases which are always subject to reporting restrictions in the U.K.
There are always reporting restrictions on naming the children.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Apparently the Daily Mirror is going to jail for breaking a law that only Shatterface knows about....
https://www.mirror.co.uk/all-about/rolf-harris-trial
https://www.mirror.co.uk/all-about/rolf-harris-trial
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Those victims are all adults now. Reporting restrictions can be lifted but they are default in chilf abuse cases.SM1957 wrote: ↑ Apparently the Daily Mirror is going to jail for breaking a law that only Shatterface knows about....
https://www.mirror.co.uk/all-about/rolf-harris-trial
But I guess the reporting restrictions on the trials of Fred and Rosemary West and Ian Huntley were imposed because the courts in the U.K. are run by Islamists.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
I thought this was interesting - ie finding out (what is more likely to be) the real reason why DC Comics is employing Zoe Quinn.
Basically - part virtual signalling, part appeasement, and part distraction...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqMJG5AXcbs
Basically - part virtual signalling, part appeasement, and part distraction...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqMJG5AXcbs
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Some more in the Law that only I and the CPS are aware of:
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/r ... defendantsThe principal exception to the open justice principle relates to youth court proceedings, which by statute are not open to the public. Section 49 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 (CYPA 1933) places an automatic restriction on reporting information that identifies or is likely to identify any person under the age of 18 who is concerned in youth court proceedings as a victim, witness or defendant.
Additionally, there is now a discretionary power under section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA 1999) to restrict reporting the identity of victims, witnesses and defendants under the age of 18 who appear in magistrates' courts and the Crown Court. The protection provided by these provisions is subject to and should be interpreted in accordance with the rights contained in the European Convention of Human Rights (Annex 2) and in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 (UNCRC) (Annex 3). The UNCRC has been ratified by the UK so although it has not been formally incorporated unto the law in England and Wales, the Articles have binding force. It also informs the way that the ECHR is interpreted in cases involving children and young people under the age of 18.
All courts must also have regard to the welfare of all children and young people who attend the court as victims, witnesses or defendants (section 44 CYPA 1933) and this will be a relevant consideration when deciding whether reporting should be restricted. The welfare of the child is likely to favour a restriction on publication. Any decision to lift reporting restrictions must be necessary, proportionate and there must be a pressing social need for it (Article 10 ECHR).
The general rule is that reporting restrictions expire when the young person attains the age of 18 as he/she is no longer a child in the proceedings and does not come within the child protection remit of the CYPA 1933 whether under section 39: R v CCC ex p W, B and C [2001] 1 Cr. App R (2) or section 49: T v DPP and North East Press [2003] EWHC 2408 Admin. The purpose underlying these sections is not to protect the interest of young people who have become adults.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Lalo Dagach has an interesting interview with Graeme Wood, author of 'The Way of the Strangers: Encounters with the Islamic State'
They even get into some of the progressive aspects of ISIS / Islam...
https://soundcloud.com/lalodagachpodcas ... amic-state
They even get into some of the progressive aspects of ISIS / Islam...
https://soundcloud.com/lalodagachpodcas ... amic-state
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
I fell asleep early last night and woke up and couldn't get back to sleep. Something was really bothering me.
I do not know what is happening in the world. I just feel I can not trust any sources anymore. The most I can do is ask people who I trust who may know and even then they may not have the most complete picture.
This is very unsettling.
I do not know what is happening in the world. I just feel I can not trust any sources anymore. The most I can do is ask people who I trust who may know and even then they may not have the most complete picture.
This is very unsettling.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Another example: the Ulster Rugby rape trial which concerned adult accusers. Reporting restrictions were maintained throughout the trial and lifted some weeks after the conclusion, after numerous appeals, and with the consent of the accused:
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.belf ... 97539.htmlAt the start of the trial back in January, Judge Patricia Smyth put a reporting restriction in place which banned all media from reporting anything said, or any applications made, in the absence of the jury.
This included the media not being able to report that an application was made by Frank O'Donoghoe - the barrister representing Stuart Olding - in the final stages of the trial to discharge the jury...
Any reporting restrictions imposed during a hearing are usually automatically lifted at the end of a trial, as the jury can no longer be prejudiced. However, in the 'rugby rape' trial, this was not the case - and as a result, a barrister representing several media outlets made an application to have the press ban lifted.
This application has been listed twice since the jury reached and delivered their verdict on Wednesday March 28.
It was listed again today, with barristers for all four men who stood trial telling Judge Smyth they would not be opposing the application made on behalf of the media.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
It's simple. If they are blonde you should believe them.comhcinc wrote: ↑ I fell asleep early last night and woke up and couldn't get back to sleep. Something was really bothering me.
I do not know what is happening in the world. I just feel I can not trust any sources anymore. The most I can do is ask people who I trust who may know and even then they may not have the most complete picture.
This is very unsettling.
-
- .
- Posts: 6555
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
"Chilf"??? As in milf?Shatterface wrote: ↑ Reporting restrictions can be lifted but they are default in chilf abuse cases.
I'm calling it now: Shatterface is a pedeeophile and wants to use electrical currents to reanimate the corpse of Jimmy Saville so he can be returned to his glory days of the 70s and 80s.
-
- .
- Posts: 6555
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Whereas I am a simple Peezohpile, who wants nothing more in life than to lie in a bathtub full of squid, in a small America town, and cast my judgements of "Guilty! Rape him with a dead animal!" upon those who displease me and my opinions of the day.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Speaking of Ian Huntley, picked on by the press because he's white of course:
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Chilf out, dude.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑"Chilf"??? As in milf?Shatterface wrote: ↑ Reporting restrictions can be lifted but they are default in chilf abuse cases.
I'm calling it now: Shatterface is a pedeeophile and wants to use electrical currents to reanimate the corpse of Jimmy Saville so he can be returned to his glory days of the 70s and 80s.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
For the record I think Huntley should be kept in the sex offenders wing, and that the rapists there should treat him as a real woman.
-
- .
- Posts: 6555
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Wilf do.Shatterface wrote: ↑Chilf out, dude.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑"Chilf"??? As in milf?Shatterface wrote: ↑ Reporting restrictions can be lifted but they are default in chilf abuse cases.
I'm calling it now: Shatterface is a pedeeophile and wants to use electrical currents to reanimate the corpse of Jimmy Saville so he can be returned to his glory days of the 70s and 80s.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Linehan should watch out for the political trans, they're going to tear him into pieces over his transphobia :bjarte:
(I agree that sending a murderer in a women's prison just out of self-identification as a woman is probably not a wise idea).
-
- .
- Posts: 2649
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
For the record I think Huntley (and cunts like him) should have no more time or tax payers money wasted on him with the exception of the bullet that's fired into the back of his head.Shatterface wrote: ↑ For the record I think Huntley should be kept in the sex offenders wing, and that the rapists there should treat him as a real woman.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
I think if Huntley thinks he'll get a softer ride from female prisoners he should watch The Handmaid's Tale
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Sure I can try that but both Ric Flair and Dusty Rhodes are blonde!Shatterface wrote: ↑It's simple. If they are blonde you should believe them.comhcinc wrote: ↑ I fell asleep early last night and woke up and couldn't get back to sleep. Something was really bothering me.
I do not know what is happening in the world. I just feel I can not trust any sources anymore. The most I can do is ask people who I trust who may know and even then they may not have the most complete picture.
This is very unsettling.
http://20.theladbiblegroup.com/s3/conte ... c2b665.jpg
I'm back to square one!
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
For people with persistent gender dysphoria, transition can alleviate much of the symptoms of the dysphoria. It does not work as a panacea for the many comorbid mental health issues, and solid data show that -- contra the trans radical dogma -- things like suicidal ideation do not decrease post-transition.
There are also numerous cases of transition regret, which is vehemently denied by the trans radicals, who viciously attack regretters who speak up. And since 80% of children with GD spontaneously remit, the current trend to fast-track all of them into transition will lead to untold instances of heartbreaking regret down the road.
The proper clinical approach is to treat all of the patient's issues holistically. Often times, this would entail focusing on what's behind general dysphoria, which in these cases manifest with their perceived sex. But laws already exist in places (i.e., Ontario), and are being proposed elsewhere (i.e., California) to make it illegal for a mental health professional to conduct any therapy other than transition.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Does Trump think calling KJU a fatty is going to help the negotiations?
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
I agree with the horse!Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑For people with persistent gender dysphoria, transition can alleviate much of the symptoms of the dysphoria. It does not work as a panacea for the many comorbid mental health issues, and solid data show that -- contra the trans radical dogma -- things like suicidal ideation do not decrease post-transition.
There are also numerous cases of transition regret, which is vehemently denied by the trans radicals, who viciously attack regretters who speak up. And since 80% of children with GD spontaneously remit, the current trend to fast-track all of them into transition will lead to untold instances of heartbreaking regret down the road.
The proper clinical approach is to treat all of the patient's issues holistically. Often times, this would entail focusing on what's behind general dysphoria, which in these cases manifest with their perceived sex. But laws already exist in places (i.e., Ontario), and are being proposed elsewhere (i.e., California) to make it illegal for a mental health professional to conduct any therapy other than transition.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
-
- .
- Posts: 6555
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
-
- .
- Posts: 2649
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
HAHA, boy does it ever. Except Thud and Clank is probably a more apt name for it today. I'm sure it wasn't anything as banal as pronouns that made Germans go volcanic :lol:feathers wrote: ↑It's the Sturm und Drang all over again, isn't it?Ape+lust wrote: ↑Sun Jun 10, 2018 3:50 pmWhat happened to that mass scream-off they were going to do? They scheduled a date and time for Trump haters worldwide to scream at the sky. I don't know if I missed it or they forgot to do it.
....Hey, you want to see impotence? The real stuff? Stand over there and cover your ears. You're going to get a face full of someone unhinged because they're miserable and can't do a thing about it.
Whoa. Powerful, huh? Really sends a message. Fuck off, Trump!
Sound familiar? Except that our version escaped from the confines of literature and music.wikipedia wrote:Sturm und Drang [...] was a proto-Romantic movement in German literature and music that occurred between the late 1760s and the early 1780s. Within the movement, individual subjectivity and, in particular, extremes of emotion were given free expression in reaction to the perceived constraints of rationalism imposed by the Enlightenment and associated aesthetic movements.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
HEEE! That's probably the best one I've seen yet. :lol: :clap:
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
So, I guess the plan is to feed him until he explodes?
https://imgur.com/fqc7Zne.jpg
4 months ago...
https://imgur.com/1qzCK5v.jpg
https://imgur.com/fqc7Zne.jpg
4 months ago...
https://imgur.com/1qzCK5v.jpg
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Postponed -- AGAIN!! -- until tomorrow.
Re: There are 2018 genders... and a bitch ain't one
Shit, you are right!
There are two horses now. That shit needs to change.