The Crass Teat
https://imgur.com/20u0mA7.jpg
The Pasty Nipple
The Bathtub Blowhard
I don't always want that vulval feel. But when I do, its Aplysia.
Checkmate transactivists and "feminists"!Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 11:49 amIt's debunked though, by the fact that transwomen can't code worth shit, and, as we all know, they aren't women.
Steersman JUNE 28, 2018, 4:39 PMOh really? You might want to do a bit of research before making such bold – and untenable – assertions. Starting with: https://web.archive.org/web/20151101065 ... alysis-07/RC: And lies. For example, Zinnia Jones has never said transwomen are women in the sense of having reproductive capability. She has said literally exactly the opposite ….
Wherein he bravely, if foolhardily, crosses the Rubicon in style by asserting “Trans women are female”. Y’all can play your childish weasel-word games, largely based on junk science and anti-intellectualism, by insisting, since there’s a wide spectrum of physiological and psychological attributes that correlate to a greater or lesser extent with the terms and attributes “male” and “female”, that there’s absolutely no “essence” to those terms, or to the related ones, “man” and “woman”. That you are thereby free to make them mean anything and everything that you want them to, and whenever you want – willy nilly, without rhyme or reason. With the result then that the words mean absolutely diddly-squat, and their collection – “tales told by idiots, signifying nothing”. ....
He still doesn't have enough guts or intellectual honesty to actually deal with the fact that Zinnia claims transwomen are female even though Carrier claimed otherwise. Or with any of my other challenges to trans-ideology, to the trans-delusion.Richard Carrier JUNE 28, 2018, 7:30 PM POST AUTHOR
Now you are just ignoring every fact and repeating the same falsehoods and weirdo views.
Gender is not a statement about biology. Sex is not gender. And sex is already referenced in the prefixes trans- and cis-. This refutes everything you are saying. And you’ve had this explained to you repeatedly. ....
Zinnia Jones is mentally ill, so nothing he says makes any sense.Steersman wrote: ↑Checkmate transactivists and "feminists"!Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 11:49 amIt's debunked though, by the fact that transwomen can't code worth shit, and, as we all know, they aren't women.
But, in related news, I've been having a bit of a "spirited" (not religious ...) conversation with Richard Carrier - AKA Sticky Dicky - on a post of his - How the Right and the Left Nuked Atheism Plus - which was largely in response to a critical video by Noel Plum as was discussed here a bit earlier. But I was actually somewhat encouraged as Carrier seemed to be accepting some responsibility for that debacle - and for the general lack of dialog - even if it looked like he was engaging in some historical revisionism.
And I was doubly encouraged as he has actually responded to several of my comments - even if not in a particularly honest fashion though that's Carrier for you - despite me not actually being a patron of his. However, his response to my latest once again proves his intellectual dishonesty and more or less closes the door to any further discussions. But, for posterity and reference, a bit of my closing comment and his response:Steersman JUNE 28, 2018, 4:39 PMOh really? You might want to do a bit of research before making such bold – and untenable – assertions. Starting with: https://web.archive.org/web/20151101065 ... alysis-07/RC: And lies. For example, Zinnia Jones has never said transwomen are women in the sense of having reproductive capability. She has said literally exactly the opposite ….
Wherein he bravely, if foolhardily, crosses the Rubicon in style by asserting “Trans women are female”. Y’all can play your childish weasel-word games, largely based on junk science and anti-intellectualism, by insisting, since there’s a wide spectrum of physiological and psychological attributes that correlate to a greater or lesser extent with the terms and attributes “male” and “female”, that there’s absolutely no “essence” to those terms, or to the related ones, “man” and “woman”. That you are thereby free to make them mean anything and everything that you want them to, and whenever you want – willy nilly, without rhyme or reason. With the result then that the words mean absolutely diddly-squat, and their collection – “tales told by idiots, signifying nothing”. ....He still doesn't have enough guts or intellectual honesty to actually deal with the fact that Zinnia claims transwomen are female even though Carrier claimed otherwise. Or with any of my other challenges to trans-ideology, to the trans-delusion.Richard Carrier JUNE 28, 2018, 7:30 PM POST AUTHOR
Now you are just ignoring every fact and repeating the same falsehoods and weirdo views.
Gender is not a statement about biology. Sex is not gender. And sex is already referenced in the prefixes trans- and cis-. This refutes everything you are saying. And you’ve had this explained to you repeatedly. ....
Yea - like many of his tribe. Certainly sad, and rather depressing, but the whole issue highlights the problems caused by pandering to the delusional.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Zinnia Jones is mentally ill, so nothing he says makes any sense.Steersman wrote: ↑Checkmate transactivists and "feminists"!Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 11:49 amIt's debunked though, by the fact that transwomen can't code worth shit, and, as we all know, they aren't women.
But, in related news, I've been having a bit of a "spirited" (not religious ...) conversation with Richard Carrier - AKA Sticky Dicky - on a post of his - How the Right and the Left Nuked Atheism Plus - which was largely in response to a critical video by Noel Plum as was discussed here a bit earlier. But I was actually somewhat encouraged as Carrier seemed to be accepting some responsibility for that debacle - and for the general lack of dialog - even if it looked like he was engaging in some historical revisionism.
<snip>
He still doesn't have enough guts or intellectual honesty to actually deal with the fact that Zinnia claims transwomen are female even though Carrier claimed otherwise. Or with any of my other challenges to trans-ideology, to the trans-delusion.
:-) Expect Carrier will be waiting a long time if it's contingent on Heina finally publishing his oft-promised tome on Islam.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Dicky is just supporting this shite cuz he still hopes to bang Heina Dhababoythey some day.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180629010 ... ives/14153But you still don’t have enough guts, enough intellectual honesty, to actually define sex – i.e., “male” and “female” – do you? Nor to address the standard biological one, i.e., the ability to produce sperm or ova. Nor to acknowledge that Zinnia was insisting that transwomen are female – despite your earlier claim to the contrary.
While you’re to be commended for changing your tune a bit from days of yore, you still look rather remarkably narrow-minded and dogmatic – the fatal flaw that led to the demise of Atheism-Plus itself.
This witty exchange makes me realize that, apart from 'I have no mouth...', I haven't read any Harlan Ellison. What good stories should I be looking out for?
:lol: :clap:
I gather his poly name is Dick Candida Carrier Innkeeper plus some. He is no longer a maiden.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Hey Steerz! I dare ya to ask Sticky Dicky why he's still using his maiden name.
??? He's in a gay marriage and plays the wife? He's becoming a transwoman for the same reason?Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Hey Steerz! I dare ya to ask Sticky Dicky why he's still using his maiden name.