Fuck off, Jamie!

Old subthreads
Locked
Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1141

Post by Shatterface »

comhcinc wrote: I am not a big photos guy either. I frankly don't understand how some people have so many photos of themselves. It' seems vain to me.
The existence of the Selfie is the thing about my species I understand the least.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1142

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

MarcusAu wrote: You probably don't like Man of La Mancha either.
I decided to write Cervantes' Don Quixote from scratch, but I got a sentence wrong in Chapter 38 and had to start all over.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1143

Post by free thoughtpolice »

screwtape wrote:
Shatterface wrote: We need a DSM of social pathologies the way we do for individual pathologies. There are psychological issues that only manifest - or at least are magnified - in groups.

We also need to be aware of how even reporting on on phenomena can boost them. There are guidelines on reporting suicide clusters, for instance, or eating disorders or self-harm. Responsible journalists don't make this behaviour look exciting or novel or cool.
Get a copy of The Herd Instinct in Peace and War by Sir Wilfred Trotter. I have a soft spot for Trotter, not just for his useful bone-nibbling forceps that I always neatened up digits with when they had confronted the business end of a a chainsaw, but for endowing a gold medal for junior surgery at UCHMS (which I won in 1979).
There's also this oldie but goodie:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordi ... _of_Crowds

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1144

Post by Lsuoma »

MarcusAu wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:24 am
Shatterface wrote:
...sex is real...
Way to erase incels...
An admirable goal...

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1145

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

DrokkIt wrote:
Hunt wrote: To what extent is gender dysphoria an actual thing
We don't know yet, but as more information emerges we get a clearer picture:

https://telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/05/22 ... fferences/

The issue with your solution (stop emphasising gender) assumes the cause of this is external, but I personally suspect that for the most part some people just feel this way. Sure, you are going to get transtrenders who jump on the bandwagon precisely because of the buzz around it, but you had 'gender bending' gay behaviour from otherwise straight men in the 70s- no reason to deny actual gay men exist because of that.
1) A very rare number of people internally feel they are of the opposite sex from an early age. This I'd label 'true transgender';
2) Another rare group of men have the paraphilia of being sexually aroused by imagining or seeing themselves as women. They live as men for most of their lives with no indications of dysphoria, then transition in adulthood. They usually declare themselves either 'lesbian' or asexual. These are autogynephiles like Bruce Jenner and Dave Muskrat;
3) A rare number of females who were physically masculinized in the womb by screwed up hormones end up identifying as men, the rest move to San Francisco;
4) Some same-sex-attracted people believe their attraction means they should be the opposite sex. This is culture-driven and a common, usually passing phase for many young gays;
5) A growing number of young people exhibit no indications of GD in early childhood, then suddenly declare themselves trans, usually in waves of groups of friends. A shocking number of them are teenage girls on the Autism spectrum, others are non-conforming 'gender benders', some are attention-seeking narcissists.

These are distinct phenomena, and there may be more categories. To prescribe one cure for all -- rapid transition with hormones & surgery -- is criminal.

Oh, and the brain scans don't say much at all. Living & acting as the opposite sex could easily affect the physical brain.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1146

Post by comhcinc »

Pretty decent list horse.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1147

Post by Shatterface »

1) is what we used to call transsexual.

I think they're what most people think of when we are talking about transgender, and most people would be surprised when you tell them they are a minority, and often marginalised within the transgender community.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1148

Post by Shatterface »

By coincidence, the Hawaiian shirt I mentioned above features Tony the Tiger. Maybe I should dig it out and cause some real offence...
IN DEFENCE OF TONY THE TIGER

Public-health advocates are moving in on the one danger we’ve all been missing: cereal-box cartoon characters. That’s right, Tony the Tiger, Cap’n Crunch, Count Chocula, and Snap, Crackle and Pop are all after our children. But, luckily, the European Union, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and Jamie Oliver are here to protect us.
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/ar ... 0jsv0HTXYU

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1149

Post by comhcinc »

Shatterface wrote: By coincidence, the Hawaiian shirt I mentioned above features Tony the Tiger. Maybe I should dig it out and cause some real offence...
IN DEFENCE OF TONY THE TIGER

Public-health advocates are moving in on the one danger we’ve all been missing: cereal-box cartoon characters. That’s right, Tony the Tiger, Cap’n Crunch, Count Chocula, and Snap, Crackle and Pop are all after our children. But, luckily, the European Union, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and Jamie Oliver are here to protect us.
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/ar ... 0jsv0HTXYU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtsQwicbsy4

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1150

Post by Shatterface »

I don't eat Frosties because of the advertising anyway. I eat them because they are grrrreat.

piginthecity
.
.
Posts: 1006
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:20 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1151

Post by piginthecity »

Lsuoma wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:24 am
Shatterface wrote:
...sex is real...
Way to erase incels...
An admirable goal...
I'd forgotten about those. I think it's blown over.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1152

Post by Really? »

God bless Elfwick.
Also funny:

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1153

Post by Really? »

Good job, activists! Now the movie probably won't get made. And if it does, no one will see it. Way to leverage the power of story to inform the 99.7% about who you are and how you deserve to be treated with respect!

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1154

Post by Shatterface »

I think it's good news for everyone that nobody will accidentally see a film about a transman who runs massage parlours just because it had Scarlet Johannson in it and they thought it might be entertaining.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1155

Post by Shatterface »

Also, the pride of your community probably oughtn't be invested in movies about brothel keepers.

Isn't there a transperson who cured cancer or something?

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1156

Post by Lsuoma »

Really? wrote: God bless Elfwick.
Also funny:
It looks like someone didn't have the lung power to blow it up properly.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1157

Post by comhcinc »


Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1158

Post by Shatterface »

Too bad they couldn't inflate it with their egos.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1159

Post by Shatterface »

Things I discovered this week:

Picnic on Hanging Rock was based on a novel, not a historical incident.

I never knew that.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1160

Post by comhcinc »


RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1161

Post by Ape+lust »

comhcinc wrote:
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
These brats have no idea how pampered they are in this age of ubiquitous video. Not long ago, they would've been beaten for their assholery.

I saw a long version of this earlier. You can hear the white kids taunting one of the black cops by calling him a nigger. Several times.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1162

Post by Ape+lust »

Shatterface wrote: Things I discovered this week:

Picnic on Hanging Rock was based on a novel, not a historical incident.

I never knew that.
Huh. I didn't know that, either. It turns out the novel actually had a resolution that was removed before publication, then published separately after the author's death.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1163

Post by comhcinc »

Ape+lust wrote: These brats have no idea how pampered they are in this age of ubiquitous video. Not long ago, they would've been beaten for their assholery.

I saw a long version of this earlier. You can hear the white kids taunting one of the black cops by calling him a nigger. Several times.
The nigger thing is at the end of the video as well. I wonder what the story is behind these arrests.

Anyway, I don't think they were have been beaten without the videos. I think we live in a country where idiots like this get to be idiots. I just love how sure the filmers are that everyone will see this cops don't absolutely nothing wrong and agree with them that this is like Hitler rounding up Da Jews.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1164

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

It would be really nice if all those kids disparging the police got to form their own little state, no police. My guess is that it wouldn't last more than a week, even if they managed to feed themselves.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1165

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Shatterface wrote: I think it's good news for everyone that nobody will accidentally see a film about a transman who runs massage parlours just because it had Scarlet Johannson in it and they thought it might be entertaining.
Geez, I watched that completely stupid movie about aliens eating scotsmen just cuz it had ScarJo very naked in it.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1166

Post by comhcinc »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: It would be really nice if all those kids disparging the police got to form their own little state, no police. My guess is that it wouldn't last more than a week, even if they managed to feed themselves.
I wonder if they would get guns?

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1167

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Shatterface wrote: Things I discovered this week:

Picnic on Hanging Rock was based on a novel, not a historical incident.

I never knew that.
Geez, I watched that completely stupid movie in the vain hope those girls would get so hot that ... well, you don’t need to know.

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1168

Post by rayshul »

screwtape wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 5:21 am
Shatterface wrote: We need a DSM of social pathologies the way we do for individual pathologies. There are psychological issues that only manifest - or at least are magnified - in groups.

We also need to be aware of how even reporting on on phenomena can boost them. There are guidelines on reporting suicide clusters, for instance, or eating disorders or self-harm. Responsible journalists don't make this behaviour look exciting or novel or cool.
Absolutely normal behaviour in younger age groups is to imitate under the influence of peer pressure. So of course there will be what some have called 'transtrenders' and the younger ones will not be making a political statement like the college-age kids with blue hair; they will be truly confused. We know that 80% of kids with gender dysphoria (not capitalised as I'm including all gender unhappiness and confusion rather than just strict DSM-V cases) will eventually become content with their biological sex, but experienced clinicians who point that out get fired (see Ken Zucker's case) and the new norm is to affirm and commit the kids to an irreversible decision without waiting to see if the situation sticks. There's is even great criticism of those who prefer to conduct a proper psychological evaluation to see what else is going on (after all, at the minimum putting someone on testosterone when they have unresolved mental health conditions isn't likely to work out well). The woman who introduced the Dutch puberty-blocking regimen to America, Laura Edwards-Leeper, is now reviled for not simply tossing kids on to the regime without an assessment. The result of all this will be rising rates of de-transitioning, and if you think not all transitioners pass, think how de-transitioners get by. You lost your fertility, your breasts, your vagina or your penis. Your voice is deep and won't ever be feminine. Removing a pseudopenis and trying to fashion a neo-vagina in a pelvis filled with scar tissue from the removal of the vagina you were born with isn't going to be possible for most, and results in a caricature when it is. Then see what happens to suicide rates. Responsibility will lie at the door of the SJWs who have recklessly and irresponsibly demanded such shoddy care for children.
We now have mass amounts of kids claiming to be trans, so I think the 80% stat is going to go right out the window. I suspect it'll wind up more like 99%.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1169

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

comhcinc wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 12:23 pm
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: It would be really nice if all those kids disparging the police got to form their own little state, no police. My guess is that it wouldn't last more than a week, even if they managed to feed themselves.
I wonder if they would get guns?
Yes.
4WM (1).jpg
(194.28 KiB) Downloaded 231 times
They may not clean them, however.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1170

Post by comhcinc »

Oh damn, this might get good after all!

https://media1.tenor.com/images/ad2fba2 ... id=9856188

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1171

Post by comhcinc »

BTW Everyone.

Happy Finland Friday!

http://logoonline.mtvnimages.com/uri/mg ... &width=480

No tranny ass pussy lady boys here!

screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2713
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1172

Post by screwtape »

MarcusAu wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:24 am

...sex is real...
Of course it is. Personally, I always found it wise to use the cheat code for max weapons, ammo and shields before starting.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1173

Post by Shatterface »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Shatterface wrote: Things I discovered this week:

Picnic on Hanging Rock was based on a novel, not a historical incident.

I never knew that.
Geez, I watched that completely stupid movie in the vain hope those girls would get so hot that ... well, you don’t need to know.
I always figured we'd solve the mystery when the skeletons turned up with Abo toothmarks or alien probes up their butts.

How the hell can we ever solve a mystery that didn't happen?

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1174

Post by rayshul »

Shatterface wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 11:39 am
Things I discovered this week:

Picnic on Hanging Rock was based on a novel, not a historical incident.

I never knew that.
I knew that. Book is pretty fucking good

InfraRedBucket
.
.
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1175

Post by InfraRedBucket »

Shatterface wrote: I don't eat Frosties because of the advertising anyway. I eat them because they are grrrreat.
Tony The Tiger? Reminds me of this infamous case a few years back thanks to our wacky Crown Prosecution Service.
MWSnap114 2018-07-13, 22_21_56.jpg
(74.19 KiB) Downloaded 213 times
Andrew Holland, 51, was wrongly accused of possessing bestiality porn in 2009, but charges were dropped 6 months later, when authorities realized that what they thought was a video of a woman and a tiger was actually a video of a woman and a human man in a tiger costume, according to the Independent.

Now, the Welsh bus driver is fighting against the United Kingdom’s “Extreme Pornography Act,” the New Statesman reports.

Officials realized their mistake in Holland’s case when they noticed that the tiger said “That’s grrrrrrreat!” in the manner of Frosted Flakes’ Tony the Tiger. Holland was cleared of a second charge nine months later, when a 6-second-clip that prosecutors said showed violent genital mutilation turned out to be a “spoof” video featuring ketchup and cocktail sausages.

Holland says both videos had been sent to him by friends as jokes, and that even though he was eventually let off the hook, his life was permanently damaged by the accusations.

“I lost my job, I had to move and I ended up having a heart attack with all the stress of it,” he told the Independent. “People were ringing me in the middle of the night. Three young lads turned up at my door and were calling me everything. I was threatened on more than one occasion.”

Holland and his legal team want the Crown Prosecution Service to review the Extreme Pornography Act. In a letter sent to the head of the CPS last week, Holland’s lawyers say that none of this would have happened if the U.K.’s Extreme Pornography Act, a measure implemented in 2008, were not so vague.


His attorneys argue that because the law uses “inherently subjective” terms like “grossly offensive” and “disgusting,” it’s not clear what constitutes an “extreme” image under the law:
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ ... _n_6064160

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1176

Post by MarcusAu »

screwtape wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:24 am

...sex is real...
Of course it is. Personally, I always found it wise to use the cheat code for max weapons, ammo and shields before starting.
Hang on. I never said that!

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1177

Post by DrokkIt »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
DrokkIt wrote:
Hunt wrote: To what extent is gender dysphoria an actual thing
We don't know yet, but as more information emerges we get a clearer picture:

https://telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/05/22 ... fferences/

The issue with your solution (stop emphasising gender) assumes the cause of this is external, but I personally suspect that for the most part some people just feel this way. Sure, you are going to get transtrenders who jump on the bandwagon precisely because of the buzz around it, but you had 'gender bending' gay behaviour from otherwise straight men in the 70s- no reason to deny actual gay men exist because of that.
1) A very rare number of people internally feel they are of the opposite sex from an early age. This I'd label 'true transgender';
2) Another rare group of men have the paraphilia of being sexually aroused by imagining or seeing themselves as women. They live as men for most of their lives with no indications of dysphoria, then transition in adulthood. They usually declare themselves either 'lesbian' or asexual. These are autogynephiles like Bruce Jenner and Dave Muskrat;
3) A rare number of females who were physically masculinized in the womb by screwed up hormones end up identifying as men, the rest move to San Francisco;
4) Some same-sex-attracted people believe their attraction means they should be the opposite sex. This is culture-driven and a common, usually passing phase for many young gays;
5) A growing number of young people exhibit no indications of GD in early childhood, then suddenly declare themselves trans, usually in waves of groups of friends. A shocking number of them are teenage girls on the Autism spectrum, others are non-conforming 'gender benders', some are attention-seeking narcissists.

These are distinct phenomena, and there may be more categories. To prescribe one cure for all -- rapid transition with hormones & surgery -- is criminal.

Oh, and the brain scans don't say much at all. Living & acting as the opposite sex could easily affect the physical brain.
For sure- I wasn't posting that as proof, merely that the science is incomplete at this point.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1178

Post by KiwiInOz »

Shatterface wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 8:25 am
comhcinc wrote: What part of Ed Wood's life did you find the Zaniest?
The bit about him thinking he was a film director.
Bugger off. He was cool.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/ ... 33x423.jpg

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1179

Post by Shatterface »

Edward Woodward was the original Shatterface:


Nicest of The Damned
.
.
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 5:57 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1180

Post by Nicest of The Damned »

comhcinc wrote:
MarcusAu wrote: Cheer up.

We'll all be dead soon enough.
Promises, promises...
Fuck chance of that.


screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2713
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1181

Post by screwtape »

MarcusAu wrote:
screwtape wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:24 am

...sex is real...
Of course it is. Personally, I always found it wise to use the cheat code for max weapons, ammo and shields before starting.
Hang on. I never said that!
Sorry, it was Shatterface. I'll mark you down as thinking sex is unreal, OK?

screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2713
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1182

Post by screwtape »

Shatterface wrote: Edward Woodward was the original Shatterface:

Rather liked the character 'Lonely' in Callan - reminded me of Bluebottle.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1183

Post by MarcusAu »

screwtape wrote:
Sorry, it was Shatterface. I'll mark you down as thinking sex is unreal, OK?
That's Ace with me.

Guest_44ea1a26

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1184

Post by Guest_44ea1a26 »


Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1185

Post by Shatterface »

screwtape wrote: Rather liked the character 'Lonely' in Callan - reminded me of Bluebottle.
http://www.televisionheaven.co.uk/img/c ... times5.jpg

Callan is a great antidote to the glamorous spy shows of the Sixties.

I love Danger Man, The Avengers, The Man from UNCLE and the rest, but sometimes you just need something that reminds you how squalid the real thing could be.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1186

Post by comhcinc »

MarcusAu wrote:
screwtape wrote:
Sorry, it was Shatterface. I'll mark you down as thinking sex is unreal, OK?
That's Ace with me.
The best sex is unreal.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1187

Post by MarcusAu »

screwtape wrote:
Rather liked the character 'Lonely' in Callan - reminded me of Bluebottle.
Rather strange that the inspiration for Bluebottle outlived Bluebottle

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1188

Post by AndrewV69 »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 12:15 pm
It would be really nice if all those kids disparging the police got to form their own little state, no police. My guess is that it wouldn't last more than a week, even if they managed to feed themselves.
Welp, if Baltimore is any indication, refer to 2017 sees highest murder rate ever in shrinking Baltimore
"The conventional wisdom, or widely agreed upon speculation, suggests that the great increase in murders is happening partly because the police have withdrawn from aggressively addressing crime in the city's many poor, crime-ridden neighborhoods," said Donald Norris, professor emeritus of public policy at the University of Maryland Baltimore County.
OK, having dropped my dog whistle showing I am racist, causing harm, committing violence, and classicist, and incidentally clearly showing that I am a misogynist, not to mention my implied homophobia, xenophobia and sexism.

I now present City under siege: A look back at the 1981 Halifax police strike
While the rest of the city was relatively quiet, the crowd there turned into an unruly mob, fueled by booze and a sense of anonymity. Things got ugly.

Windows were smashed, stores on Gottingen were looted, drivers were pulling doughnuts and racing outside police headquarters - all the while, striking officers stood by and watched.
I suppose I could mention 1969: Montreal’s ‘night of terror’
Montreal is in a state of shock. A police officer is dead and 108 people have been arrested following 16 hours of chaos during which police and firefighters refused to work

InfraRedBucket
.
.
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1189

Post by InfraRedBucket »

Shatterface wrote:
screwtape wrote: Rather liked the character 'Lonely' in Callan - reminded me of Bluebottle.
http://www.televisionheaven.co.uk/img/c ... times5.jpg




Callan is a great antidote to the glamorous spy shows of the Sixties.

I love Danger Man, The Avengers, The Man from UNCLE and the rest, but sometimes you just need something that reminds you how squalid the real thing could be.

Russell Hunter aka Mr Stabs from Ace Of Wands.....
"Hand of Stabs
Turn This Fool
Into a fish
Without a Pool"
mr-stabs2.jpg
(19.83 KiB) Downloaded 147 times
mr-stabs1.jpg
(34.86 KiB) Downloaded 152 times

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1190

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »


Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1191

Post by Lsuoma »

I see Ol' Jean-Claude Drunker has been seen out and about with a skinful again...

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1192

Post by Really? »

InfraRedBucket wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 1:23 pm
Shatterface wrote: I don't eat Frosties because of the advertising anyway. I eat them because they are grrrreat.
Tony The Tiger? Reminds me of this infamous case a few years back thanks to our wacky Crown Prosecution Service.

MWSnap114 2018-07-13, 22_21_56.jpg
Andrew Holland, 51, was wrongly accused of possessing bestiality porn in 2009, but charges were dropped 6 months later, when authorities realized that what they thought was a video of a woman and a tiger was actually a video of a woman and a human man in a tiger costume, according to the Independent.

Now, the Welsh bus driver is fighting against the United Kingdom’s “Extreme Pornography Act,” the New Statesman reports.

Officials realized their mistake in Holland’s case when they noticed that the tiger said “That’s grrrrrrreat!” in the manner of Frosted Flakes’ Tony the Tiger. Holland was cleared of a second charge nine months later, when a 6-second-clip that prosecutors said showed violent genital mutilation turned out to be a “spoof” video featuring ketchup and cocktail sausages.

Holland says both videos had been sent to him by friends as jokes, and that even though he was eventually let off the hook, his life was permanently damaged by the accusations.

“I lost my job, I had to move and I ended up having a heart attack with all the stress of it,” he told the Independent. “People were ringing me in the middle of the night. Three young lads turned up at my door and were calling me everything. I was threatened on more than one occasion.”

Holland and his legal team want the Crown Prosecution Service to review the Extreme Pornography Act. In a letter sent to the head of the CPS last week, Holland’s lawyers say that none of this would have happened if the U.K.’s Extreme Pornography Act, a measure implemented in 2008, were not so vague.


His attorneys argue that because the law uses “inherently subjective” terms like “grossly offensive” and “disgusting,” it’s not clear what constitutes an “extreme” image under the law:
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ ... _n_6064160
Can we arrest them anyway? There's gotta be something...

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1193

Post by free thoughtpolice »

:drool:

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1194

Post by Shatterface »

InfraRedBucket wrote: Russell Hunter aka Mr Stabs from Ace Of Wands.....
And Kiy Uvanov in Doctor Who - The Robots of Death:

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/tar ... 1015153337

It was the Seventies. We all dressed like that.

I have Ace of Wands on DVD. Children's TV was pretty trippy back then.

Keating
.
.
Posts: 2421
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: South of anteater guy

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1195

Post by Keating »

So, I follow KiA a little, but not much. Anyone have more information about the drama there?



Will Lsuoma ever do that here?

Guest_b8931fdb

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1196

Post by Guest_b8931fdb »

Keating wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:05 pm
So, I follow KiA a little, but not much. Anyone have more information about the drama there?



Will Lsuoma ever do that here?
Only what I see in reddit drama.

After four years, autistic creator of a subreddit tries to delete it, as he is annoyed with the bigotry that often is expressed within, gets overruled by admins and hounded by the mods and redditors.

FWIW, I think the creator of a subreddit or the FT at SP should be able to delete their creation, regardless of how many people have subbed to it. As a guest, I'd hate to see the SP go away just as I get value from KIA, but I think it's bullshit that the creator cannot delete his own subreddit.

The best theory I heard was that the admin needs KIA to exist as "it contains the group" and they don't want the shitshow that would arise with its deletion as reddit goes open warfare.

Guest_b8931fdb

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1197

Post by Guest_b8931fdb »



1:46 John: Trump has the brain of a 13-year-old boy
16:13 Glenn: Trump will be viewed as more effective than Obama
26:28 Is Trump an idiot? A savant?
40:16 Glenn: Clarence Thomas is a symbol of African-American excellence
49:58 John wishes Thomas wasn’t silent at oral argument
56:38 Critiquing the black intelligentsia
69:28 How big of a problem is the “Starbucks and swimming pools” problem?

Glenn Loury (Brown University) and John McWhorter (Columbia University, Lexicon Valley)

-------------

This was a terrific podcast, esp at 1.5x. Glenn is an MIT trained economist, often described as conservative, McWhorter a linguist, a more progressive, moderate liberal.

This discussion was not quite a fight, and these two are obviously good friends, but the gist is, is Trump an idiot 13 year old who can't see past his immediate needs and presumably a puppet of his staff and donors, or is Trump this wildly effective guy reshaping the US to his well thought out plan.

I don't think either point of view is correct, but it was a very entertaining, and actually fun podcast to listen to while walking.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1198

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Hey, wrasslin' fans, I just finished watching GLOW on NetFlix. Gorgeous Ladies of Wrestling, a fictionalized show set in the mid 80s. Wife enjoyed it, I've seen a lot worse. Back to your regularly scheduled programming.

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1199

Post by feathers »

Really? wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 10:56 am
Also funny:
https://i.imgur.com/HHNybnX.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/ZHpLJ6b.png

More of that:
https://forums.somethingawful.com/showt ... id=3862402

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#1200

Post by Lsuoma »

Seeing all those made me realize what a gem our Ape is...

Locked