Given the right screwdriver, they're interchangeable.
Fuck off, Jamie!
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
What's up, Canada? Be safe.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Only if it's the Evil Enemy doing it. If it's the Heroes, violence is free speech, and cheer-leading for bloodthirsty acts is promoting change.
And of course We (no matter who We are) are the Heroes, so It's OK When We Do It.
The SocJus, the Trumpers, the Tankies, the Alt-Right, they all believe this. They're the Warriors of Justice and Virtue against the Impending Doom, so all is fair for the, while the mere existence of their Enemies is a threat. All Those Who Disagree are Racist Shitlords, Moronic Libtards, Evil Capitalists or Globalist Cucks and just by Disagreeing they're harming Us and Our Plans and bringing forth the End Of The World As We Know It.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Am I condemned to a pit in hell if I both tsk tsk Cernovich et al for pulling the same shitty things, but enjoy the schadenfreude of seeing some santimonious prigs taken down a notch?
(Trevor's joke from 2013 is really ugly, no pun or irony intended.)
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Cernovitch is a piece of shit, for a long list of reasons.Guest_b8931fdb wrote: ↑
Am I condemned to a pit in hell if I both tsk tsk Cernovich et al for pulling the same shitty things, but enjoy the schadenfreude of seeing some santimonious prigs taken down a notch?
(Trevor's joke from 2013 is really ugly, no pun or irony intended.)
This is still the result of the online mob outrage climate that people like Noah have supported so far, when the targets were people they disliked.
I'm not cheering. I simply want to point to those that thought that the outrage machine was a wonderful way to change society for the better that we, the Evil "Centrists" who weren't on board with their methods, were 100% right in warning them about negative consequences. Not to gloat that we told them so, but to make them think about whether the outrage-baiting is really worth it.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Just to be clear, I do not know that Cernovitch had anything to do with this one, but it certainly seems to be "Inspired by Mike (TM)"Cernovitch is a piece of shit, for a long list of reasons.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
It's awkward, ain't it. There's something along similar lines going on the UK right now - Sajid Javid has effectively dropped the UKs opposition to the death penalty in the cases of the 'British' ISIS cunts known as The Beatles, who are facing trial in the US. Basically, if they're found guilty and sentenced to death, the UK government isn't gonna protest or try to meddle. Now, I oppose the death penalty wholeheartedly - but damn, I can't deny that it'll be nice to see those fuckers executed after a decade or two in a hellhole American prison.Guest_b8931fdb wrote: ↑ Am I condemned to a pit in hell if I both tsk tsk Cernovich et al for pulling the same shitty things, but enjoy the schadenfreude of seeing some santimonious prigs taken down a notch?
Life is tricky.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Just one day before:
https://imgur.com/n3I9yss.png
https://twitter.com/imwithdick/status/1 ... 6825628673
‘Rick and Morty’ Creator Dan Harmon Deletes Twitter Account After Fake Baby Rape Video Goes Viral
'Peen Weinerstein' still makes me snicker. Yeah, I'm puerile as fuck.
https://imgur.com/n3I9yss.png
https://twitter.com/imwithdick/status/1 ... 6825628673
‘Rick and Morty’ Creator Dan Harmon Deletes Twitter Account After Fake Baby Rape Video Goes Viral
'Peen Weinerstein' still makes me snicker. Yeah, I'm puerile as fuck.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Twitter thinks its algorithms can sniff out credibility. In real time, no less :twatson:
Or maybe they're just looking for a veneer to cover their too-obvious partisanship.
https://imgur.com/Qkm9BBy.png
https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/stat ... 2232702978
Or maybe they're just looking for a veneer to cover their too-obvious partisanship.
https://imgur.com/Qkm9BBy.png
https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/stat ... 2232702978
-
- .
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I am cheering the fact that a hypocrite is getting flak. He will still be a sanctimonious hypocrite if he realises that the outrage machine can backfire. The fact that their methods can backfire on them is not what is wrong about the outrage junkies. It is that they are authoritarians who believe that there is only one valid viewpoint and that is their own. That is what makes them dangerous.Kirbmarc wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:48 amCernovitch is a piece of shit, for a long list of reasons.Guest_b8931fdb wrote: ↑
Am I condemned to a pit in hell if I both tsk tsk Cernovich et al for pulling the same shitty things, but enjoy the schadenfreude of seeing some santimonious prigs taken down a notch?
(Trevor's joke from 2013 is really ugly, no pun or irony intended.)
This is still the result of the online mob outrage climate that people like Noah have supported so far, when the targets were people they disliked.
I'm not cheering. I simply want to point to those that thought that the outrage machine was a wonderful way to change society for the better that we, the Evil "Centrists" who weren't on board with their methods, were 100% right in warning them about negative consequences. Not to gloat that we told them so, but to make them think about whether the outrage-baiting is really worth it.
-
- .
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
No, they don't all believe that. It might be common to throw around easy labels and think in black and white terms but it is the justification of unprovoked violence that differentiates the far left from all except the very extreme far right. The fights that Antifa get into are of their own making. In most cases, when the right comes tooled up it is because they know that Antifa are going to try to shut down their events. The fact that they are quite gleeful about responding in kind is neither here nor there. The common trope that free speech advocates are just opportunists is really a stinking media narrative. The far Right may be guilty of that, but there is a huge middle ground that believes in free speech on principle.Kirbmarc wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:05 amOnly if it's the Evil Enemy doing it. If it's the Heroes, violence is free speech, and cheer-leading for bloodthirsty acts is promoting change.
And of course We (no matter who We are) are the Heroes, so It's OK When We Do It.
The SocJus, the Trumpers, the Tankies, the Alt-Right, they all believe this. They're the Warriors of Justice and Virtue against the Impending Doom, so all is fair for the, while the mere existence of their Enemies is a threat. All Those Who Disagree are Racist Shitlords, Moronic Libtards, Evil Capitalists or Globalist Cucks and just by Disagreeing they're harming Us and Our Plans and bringing forth the End Of The World As We Know It.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
wrt Trevor Noah -- hell ya schadenfreude from yet another virtue-signaling wanker's assholish past getting exposed. The reaction's have been typically insane, too:
Beauty is misogyny and judging women in such ways demonstrates your feelings of entitlement as a man.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
YA brilliant piece in Quillette, this by Heather Heyer of Evergreen fame:
On Toxic Femininity
On Toxic Femininity
Creating hunger in men by actively inviting the male gaze, then demanding that men have no such hunger—that is toxic femininity. Subjugating men, emasculating them when they display strength—physical, intellectual, or other—that is toxic femininity. Insisting that men, simply by virtue of being men, are toxic, and then acting surprised as relationships between men and women become more strained—that is toxic femininity. It is a game, the benefits of which go to a few while the costs are shared by all of us.
[....]
Wide variance in [mating] strategy, and shifting strategies under different conditions, is well studied in animal behavior and game theory. Given that we know this to be true in non-human animals, why would we imagine that humans are less, rather than even more, flexible? There are many ways to be female, and many ways to be male, and some of each are bad news for everyone but the individual employing them. As a social species that has become the dominant ecological force on our planet, we can and should aspire to behave in ways that are not merely selfish, not merely competitive, but also collaborative. Toxic masculinity, and toxic femininity, are inherently selfish modes, and those not employing them should be interested in seeing them eradicated.
-
- .
- Posts: 11165
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
https://www.theatlantic.com/internation ... sm/565076/
There is a model that claims to be able to predict how secularism grows compared to religiosity and may be useful in creating policies that encourage religious migrants to transition to secularism.
There is a model that claims to be able to predict how secularism grows compared to religiosity and may be useful in creating policies that encourage religious migrants to transition to secularism.
-
- .
- Posts: 5898
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Funded by Templeton. I'd be suspicious of anything they are involved in.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ https://www.theatlantic.com/internation ... sm/565076/
There is a model that claims to be able to predict how secularism grows compared to religiosity and may be useful in creating policies that encourage religious migrants to transition to secularism.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
The answer is: d) don't let in the goatfuckers in the first place.Imagine you’re the president of a European country. You’re slated to take in 50,000 refugees from the Middle East this year. Most of them are very religious, while most of your population is very secular. You want to integrate the newcomers seamlessly, minimizing the risk of economic malaise or violence, but you have limited resources. One of your advisers tells you to invest in the refugees’ education; another says providing jobs is the key; yet another insists the most important thing is giving the youth opportunities to socialize with local kids. What do you do?
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Mang, I don't care I still like Lucky Yates.
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
If you haven't paid attention to Rebecca Watson's "career" (lucky you) then she probably just comes off as a would-be internet personality. I'm kinda surprised at Watson, really. Yates stars in Archer, which has roundly been condemned by feminists and other people lacking a sense of humor. I think she's counting on her pass to avoid guilt by association.
-
- .
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
If only some people warned the left hat their "outrage howl" tactics aimed at advertisers, companies, and colleges, would be weaponised and used by nutcases on the right.
But wait, we were dubbed "free speech extremists", or something dumb as hell.
I have no fucking sympathy for virtue-signalling lefty tossers who threw liberal values under the bus, but now find themselves at the mercy of outragers pointing out "edgy" jokes from the past. Fuck 'em. They didn't listen.
But wait, we were dubbed "free speech extremists", or something dumb as hell.
I have no fucking sympathy for virtue-signalling lefty tossers who threw liberal values under the bus, but now find themselves at the mercy of outragers pointing out "edgy" jokes from the past. Fuck 'em. They didn't listen.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Poor Rebecca who at 37 thinks it's cute or edgy or shocking or cute and edgy and shocking to make a v tongue cunnilingus sign in her social media selfies, a gesture mostly seen by 10-18 year old boys and 18+ year men trying to pick up prepubescent girls as their fans on musical.ly.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:52 pmIf you haven't paid attention to Rebecca Watson's "career" (lucky you) then she probably just comes off as a would-be internet personality. I'm kinda surprised at Watson, really. Yates stars in Archer, which has roundly been condemned by feminists and other people lacking a sense of humor. I think she's counting on her pass to avoid guilt by association.
Stay edgy Becky!
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I'm more a fan of Rowdy than Lucky...
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I hope #currentMealTicket works in Apple management. His Mastercard must be smoking from the money he's spent on her this year.
With him being so generous, maybe she should dial back the chummy pics with the boyz.
https://imgur.com/W2rMbAG.jpg
It might remind him that she got greasy with him while she was with Adam, whom she was boning while she was with Sid.
With him being so generous, maybe she should dial back the chummy pics with the boyz.
https://imgur.com/W2rMbAG.jpg
It might remind him that she got greasy with him while she was with Adam, whom she was boning while she was with Sid.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
This is a person who is baseline miserable, as deep down she despises herself. The brief highs from a new, doting male love interest can be but ephemeral in her private living hell. Before long, the blackness inevitably creeps back to blanket her aimless existence, so she must seek out the drug that is attention from other males. Through no fault of his own, her Knight in Shining Apple Salary will sooner or later be cucked, then dumped for the next fool willing to become that monstrous parasite's host.Ape+lust wrote: ↑ I hope #currentMealTicket works in Apple management. His Mastercard must be smoking from the money he's spent on her this year.
With him being so generous, maybe she should dial back the chummy pics with the boyz.
https://imgur.com/W2rMbAG.jpg
It might remind him that she got greasy with him while she was with Adam, whom she was boning while she was with Sid.
On the plus side, she's got a rack and will shove a finger up your bung.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Also she really needs to get with it- these days kids are all about eatin' assGuest_b8931fdb wrote: ↑Poor Rebecca who at 37 thinks it's cute or edgy or shocking or cute and edgy and shocking to make a v tongue cunnilingus sign in her social media selfies, a gesture mostly seen by 10-18 year old boys and 18+ year men trying to pick up prepubescent girls as their fans on musical.ly.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:52 pmIf you haven't paid attention to Rebecca Watson's "career" (lucky you) then she probably just comes off as a would-be internet personality. I'm kinda surprised at Watson, really. Yates stars in Archer, which has roundly been condemned by feminists and other people lacking a sense of humor. I think she's counting on her pass to avoid guilt by association.
Stay edgy Becky!
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I agree it's funny as hell, and I have no sympathy for the hypocritical cunts. But it is important we discourage it, and not resort to it. I keep hearing "make them live up to their own rules," but as I tell my kids, other people's behavior should not determine your ethics. We shouldn't ever sink to their low level.CommanderTuvok wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 1:28 pmIf only some people warned the left hat their "outrage howl" tactics aimed at advertisers, companies, and colleges, would be weaponised and used by nutcases on the right.
But wait, we were dubbed "free speech extremists", or something dumb as hell.
I have no fucking sympathy for virtue-signalling lefty tossers who threw liberal values under the bus, but now find themselves at the mercy of outragers pointing out "edgy" jokes from the past. Fuck 'em. They didn't listen.
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
That is not very hygienic. Don't they know shit comes outa there?DrokkIt wrote: ↑Also she really needs to get with it- these days kids are all about eatin' assGuest_b8931fdb wrote: ↑Poor Rebecca who at 37 thinks it's cute or edgy or shocking or cute and edgy and shocking to make a v tongue cunnilingus sign in her social media selfies, a gesture mostly seen by 10-18 year old boys and 18+ year men trying to pick up prepubescent girls as their fans on musical.ly.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:52 pmIf you haven't paid attention to Rebecca Watson's "career" (lucky you) then she probably just comes off as a would-be internet personality. I'm kinda surprised at Watson, really. Yates stars in Archer, which has roundly been condemned by feminists and other people lacking a sense of humor. I think she's counting on her pass to avoid guilt by association.
Stay edgy Becky!
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
If Twitter is the rectal thermometer of humanity, the patient is terminal.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
It's the cesspool of social media. And social media are already the cesspool of all human stupidity, foolishness, mental issues and general irrationality.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ If Twitter is the rectal thermometer of humanity, the patient is terminal.
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
If it weren't for the stirring animal stories, cats rescued and dogs adopted, I would happily delete my Twitter.Kirbmarc wrote: ↑It's the cesspool of social media. And social media are already the cesspool of all human stupidity, foolishness, mental issues and general irrationality.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ If Twitter is the rectal thermometer of humanity, the patient is terminal.
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
The Toronto killer identified. Some play up mental illness, some the more radical Islam line. With the way the opposing media narratives go, who really knows?
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Why not both? People with mental illness are more susceptible to religious manipulation anyway.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑
The Toronto killer identified. Some play up mental illness, some the more radical Islam line. With the way the opposing media narratives go, who really knows?
But I want to see more evidence one way or another. It's still a bit too early.
-
- .
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
- Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/ ... ssion=true
Just to show the WaPo can still surprise you.
Just to show the WaPo can still surprise you.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Might be too early but there's some developing information that looks a bit "problematic":Kirbmarc wrote: ↑Why not both? People with mental illness are more susceptible to religious manipulation anyway.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑
The Toronto killer identified. Some play up mental illness, some the more radical Islam line. With the way the opposing media narratives go, who really knows?
But I want to see more evidence one way or another. It's still a bit too early.
Won't be a popular opinion, at least in some quarters ..., but some justification for laying a lot of responsibility for that at the doorsteps of the entire Muslim community:Was Danforth attack terror, or terrorism?
.... Files being reviewed by police include concern Hussain expressed “support” for a web site that was seen as “pro-ISIL,” says a law enforcement source.
Sources say police in Toronto and CSIS officials in Ottawa, as well as the RCMP, are looking into his past which sources say include his residence in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Hussain apparently had been spoken-to by authorities about his online activities. Sources say Toronto Police, the OPP and the RCMP have all had an interest in the now-deceased alleged shooter.
What law enforcement is saying is that the attack was planned, and Hussain was “well known to Toronto Police” for investigations into past crimes “involving weapons and violence.” ....
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Is anyone else following the insane shit that's happening in /pol/ these days around Hollywood?
Fucking eyes wide shut is fucking real, what the fuck is with that!
What is the fuck with people making fucking baby fucking videos
WHAT the shit
I feel like I've stepped into crazy world
Fucking eyes wide shut is fucking real, what the fuck is with that!
What is the fuck with people making fucking baby fucking videos
WHAT the shit
I feel like I've stepped into crazy world
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
In other news, though kind of related to both my foregoing post, to Jordan Peterson, to the "International Dark Web" [ooh!], and to the relevance of religion - at least portions thereof:
Still have about 10 minutes of it to watch myself, but some cogent observations by both Weinstein and Shapiro on that topic, as well as a number of earlier ones. Weinstein is saying, at that point, "... I find myself in the odd position of basically being an atheist who is very sympathetic to religion ...."
Generally unwise to be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Still have about 10 minutes of it to watch myself, but some cogent observations by both Weinstein and Shapiro on that topic, as well as a number of earlier ones. Weinstein is saying, at that point, "... I find myself in the odd position of basically being an atheist who is very sympathetic to religion ...."
Generally unwise to be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Seen bits and pieces - a relevant Twitter search:rayshul wrote: ↑ Is anyone else following the insane shit that's happening in /pol/ these days around Hollywood?
Fucking eyes wide shut is fucking real, what the fuck is with that!
What is the fuck with people making fucking baby fucking videos
WHAT the shit
I feel like I've stepped into crazy world
https://twitter.com/search?q=pedophilia ... d&src=typd
Though I wish people would stop conflating pedophilia with child rape. Unless we're going to go whole hog on thought-crime.
Lot of people who should know better are throwing the term about with gay abandon - so to speak - but they're just shooting themselves in the feet:
"pedophile destigmatizer" so ergo child rapist.
-
- .
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:26 am
- Location: England, a bastion of barbarism and cluelessness
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Today I learned: there is such a thing as "Queer Activist Theology ".
-
- Brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead
- Posts: 5059
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:08 am
- Location: Lurking in a dumpster
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
That and the Asian babes.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑If it weren't for the stirring animal stories, cats rescued and dogs adopted, I would happily delete my Twitter.
/cough
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Who's gonna take care of your wife then?Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:13 pmThe answer is: d) don't let in the goatfuckers in the first place.
I remember once upon a time how this board made fun of SJWs for missing out on obvious parodies and jokes. Then again you were always one of the more retarded ones.rayshul wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:19 pmIs anyone else following the insane shit that's happening in /pol/ these days around Hollywood?
Fucking eyes wide shut is fucking real, what the fuck is with that!
What is the fuck with people making fucking baby fucking videos
WHAT the shit
I feel like I've stepped into crazy world
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Speaking of which, what has become of Suey Park?Bhurzum wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 1:46 amThat and the Asian babes.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑If it weren't for the stirring animal stories, cats rescued and dogs adopted, I would happily delete my Twitter.
/cough
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
OK so I had a look at /pol/ on 8chan and yep it looks bad. I saw the video of him raping a plastic baby and I do not get it. WTF was he thinking?rayshul wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:19 pmIs anyone else following the insane shit that's happening in /pol/ these days around Hollywood?
Fucking eyes wide shut is fucking real, what the fuck is with that!
What is the fuck with people making fucking baby fucking videos
WHAT the shit
I feel like I've stepped into crazy world
It is all over the news now. Do a search on "Dan Harmon rape" and NO I am not putting a link to the video here (there is more than one).
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
So you can eat babies, but not rape them.
Got it.
...still finding this morality thing a bit complicated.
Got it.
...still finding this morality thing a bit complicated.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
It's still just a parody of Dexter that he apologized for anyway, dumb Sunni. The context of the sketch has been broadly shared by now so if you were actually interested in the truth of the matter, you'd have already known about it. Least the channers were honest about it being some weird sort of eye-for-an-eye versus this weird pearl-clutching.AndrewV69 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:45 amOK so I had a look at /pol/ on 8chan and yep it looks bad. I saw the video of him raping a plastic baby and I do not get it. WTF was he thinking?
It is all over the news now. Do a search on "Dan Harmon rape" and NO I am not putting a link to the video here (there is more than one).
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Oh noes. An edgelord has stumbled into our sheltered workshop. Whatever shall we do?
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I'm not going to enact the labour to find out.feathers wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:43 amSpeaking of which, what has become of Suey Park?Bhurzum wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 1:46 amThat and the Asian babes.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑If it weren't for the stirring animal stories, cats rescued and dogs adopted, I would happily delete my Twitter.
/cough
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
She starred in a crappy Syfy series about how the Internet ruined her life in 2016, then pretty much disappeared from the radar. Google has nothing on her in 2017 or 2018.Keating wrote: ↑I'm not going to enact the labour to find out.feathers wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:43 amSpeaking of which, what has become of Suey Park?Bhurzum wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 1:46 amThat and the Asian babes.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑If it weren't for the stirring animal stories, cats rescued and dogs adopted, I would happily delete my Twitter.
/cough
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Nothing on twitter, Facebook or Bing, either.
-
- .
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
I notice Talcom X was tagged in with a lot of the convo on that story. That immediately improved the odds on the story being a hoax, and then, guess what.....CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/ ... ssion=true
Just to show the WaPo can still surprise you.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
The absolute state of these people.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Well, she managed to get away with being friendly with a number of TERFs over the years without falling foul of the Trannish Inquisition - ol Becks does have a talent for getting away with stuff. I bet Catpeezle knew about it too (cos lets face it, you just know the Beard has done a wee bit of stalking when it comes to his beloved Glob) but kept it quiet lest it stir up his 'horde' against her. He probably saw what happened to Oafie and figured, in full on Travis Bickle mode, 'they must not touch her'. Which meant Peez said nothing in the hope that it would all go away.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑ If you haven't paid attention to Rebecca Watson's "career" (lucky you) then she probably just comes off as a would-be internet personality. I'm kinda surprised at Watson, really. Yates stars in Archer, which has roundly been condemned by feminists and other people lacking a sense of humor. I think she's counting on her pass to avoid guilt by association.
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Colour me skepchickal, darling. You can always remember the faces of the famous people, right?
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Shia not Sunni you presumptions bumpkin.Guest_514f8ceb wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:59 amIt's still just a parody of Dexter that he apologized for anyway, dumb Sunni. The context of the sketch has been broadly shared by now so if you were actually interested in the truth of the matter, you'd have already known about it. Least the channers were honest about it being some weird sort of eye-for-an-eye versus this weird pearl-clutching.AndrewV69 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:45 amOK so I had a look at /pol/ on 8chan and yep it looks bad. I saw the video of him raping a plastic baby and I do not get it. WTF was he thinking?
It is all over the news now. Do a search on "Dan Harmon rape" and NO I am not putting a link to the video here (there is more than one).
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Guest_514f8ceb wrote: ↑ Who's gonna take care of your wife then?
What makes you think you can get all familiar with us like that while still hiding behind a guest log-in? Get a goddamn 'nym, or slither back to 4chan with the rest of the oh-so-edgy, cowardly cunts.Guest_514f8ceb wrote: ↑ It's still just a parody of Dexter that he apologized for anyway, dumb Sunni.
-
- .
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:20 am
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Haha! She's a cold beast, alright. Even her DOG gets the what-good-are-you treatment when she despairs over what he had become (Note the #mutt tags, the only times I've seen her use them).Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ This is a person who is baseline miserable, as deep down she despises herself. The brief highs from a new, doting male love interest can be but ephemeral in her private living hell. Before long, the blackness inevitably creeps back to blanket her aimless existence, so she must seek out the drug that is attention from other males. Through no fault of his own, her Knight in Shining Apple Salary will sooner or later be cucked, then dumped for the next fool willing to become that monstrous parasite's host.
On the plus side, she's got a rack and will shove a finger up your bung.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1--7K58_4ZQ
https://i.imgur.com/642fTBI.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/LA1morh.jpg
A while later she put up a current pic with a #handsome tag to compensate.
https://i.imgur.com/tB4K5LJ.jpg
Re: Fuck off, Jamie!
Hey all, the IP this poster is using is known to host spammers, so it might be best just to let the 'tard troll away, and ignore s/h/it.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Guest_514f8ceb wrote: ↑ Who's gonna take care of your wife then?What makes you think you can get all familiar with us like that while still hiding behind a guest log-in? Get a goddamn 'nym, or slither back to 4chan with the rest of the oh-so-edgy, cowardly cunts.Guest_514f8ceb wrote: ↑ It's still just a parody of Dexter that he apologized for anyway, dumb Sunni.