Fuck off, Jamie!

Old subthreads
Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12373
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2461

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:36 am

WEIT post on the defenders of Sarah Jeong claiming reverse racism is impossible:

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... e-racists/

The usual SJW suspects are commenting that 'privilege plus prejudice' really is a thing.

Driftless
.
.
Posts: 266
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2462

Post by Driftless » Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:38 am

InfraRedBucket wrote:
Fri Aug 03, 2018 7:48 am
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Driftless wrote:
feathers wrote:
Shatterface wrote:
Thu Aug 02, 2018 11:11 am
Driftless wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:
screwtape wrote:
John D wrote: It gets even tougher to love your neighbor when you barley speak a similar language.
I don't know wheat you mean.
Realy? I thought the point was a-maize-ing in it's clarity.
I think it goes against the grain.

Or maybe he spelt it wrong?
Cereally folks, these corny puns are making my ear-ache and my bran hurt.

Any more and I'll hop it.
Yeah let's put a firm end to this.
Or start a bran new discussion just for this.
I doubt any of you have the moral fibre for that.
Enough of your strawman arguments.
Not so fast -- there is a germ of truth in what he says.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7071
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2463

Post by MarcusAu » Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:46 am

Driftless wrote:
InfraRedBucket wrote:
Fri Aug 03, 2018 7:48 am
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Driftless wrote:
feathers wrote:
Shatterface wrote:
Thu Aug 02, 2018 11:11 am
Driftless wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:
screwtape wrote:
John D wrote: It gets even tougher to love your neighbor when you barley speak a similar language.
I don't know wheat you mean.
Realy? I thought the point was a-maize-ing in it's clarity.
I think it goes against the grain.

Or maybe he spelt it wrong?
Cereally folks, these corny puns are making my ear-ache and my bran hurt.

Any more and I'll hop it.
Yeah let's put a firm end to this.
Or start a bran new discussion just for this.
I doubt any of you have the moral fibre for that.
Enough of your strawman arguments.
Not so fast -- there is a germ of truth in what he says.
I'm going to blame John D - he planted the seed.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7071
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2464

Post by MarcusAu » Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:47 am

This just turned up in my Youtube feed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1awwAgU_t8

...not sure if it relates to the current 'Pyt in-fighting or not...

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2465

Post by Ape+lust » Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:02 am

Peez retweeted a woman who was calling Sarah Jeong a national treasure. She noted that, among other things, Jeong was the one who broke the news that Elon Musk followed ZERO WOMEN on Twitter. We had to invent phrases like "hard hitting" for that kind of journalism.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2466

Post by Shatterface » Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:05 am

:hankey:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Shatterface wrote: All of a sudden people are giving a shit about conditions in British prisons.

People who, months ago, would have thought they were too soft.
So, to speak out against the clearly willful mistreatment of TR, one must be a dues-paying member in good standing of the Prison Reform Society?

You keep bashing these TR fanboi strawmen while mocking silly, made-up claims that nobody's actually made. How 'bout instead you precisely establish your own claims?

1) Do you believe that TR's treatment in prison is 'par for the course' for conditions among the general prison population?
Yes.
2) If not, do you believe it was accidental or intentional?
3) If intentional, was it expressly intended to punish him for his anti-islam stance?
The answer to 1) renders these meaningless.
4) Do you believe that TR's drumhead trial & conviction was typical of court proceedings?
Yes.
5) Do you believe it was accidental or intentional?
That what was intentional?
6) If intentional, was it expressly intended to punish him for his anti-islam stance?
If what was intentional?
7) Do you believe that the treatment TR has received at the hands of the government, police, courts, & prisons -- not mention the press -- is the result of him just being a dickhead, or is it part of a general policy to deter, hinder, intimidate & punish any who speak out against Islam?
The treatment Robinson has received is no different than any other persistent offender would receive.

You repeatedly break the law and run the police and the judiciary's nose in it and they come down on you like a tonne of bricks.

You would have no difficulty understanding this if it involved US cops with guns.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12373
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2467

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:17 am

Shatterface wrote: :hankey:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Shatterface wrote: All of a sudden people are giving a shit about conditions in British prisons.

People who, months ago, would have thought they were too soft.
So, to speak out against the clearly willful mistreatment of TR, one must be a dues-paying member in good standing of the Prison Reform Society?

You keep bashing these TR fanboi strawmen while mocking silly, made-up claims that nobody's actually made. How 'bout instead you precisely establish your own claims?

1) Do you believe that TR's treatment in prison is 'par for the course' for conditions among the general prison population?
Yes.
2) If not, do you believe it was accidental or intentional?
3) If intentional, was it expressly intended to punish him for his anti-islam stance?
The answer to 1) renders these meaningless.
4) Do you believe that TR's drumhead trial & conviction was typical of court proceedings?
Yes.
5) Do you believe it was accidental or intentional?
That what was intentional?
6) If intentional, was it expressly intended to punish him for his anti-islam stance?
If what was intentional?
7) Do you believe that the treatment TR has received at the hands of the government, police, courts, & prisons -- not mention the press -- is the result of him just being a dickhead, or is it part of a general policy to deter, hinder, intimidate & punish any who speak out against Islam?
The treatment Robinson has received is no different than any other persistent offender would receive.

You repeatedly break the law and run the police and the judiciary's nose in it and they come down on you like a tonne of bricks.

You would have no difficulty understanding this if it involved US cops with guns.
Well, I think you're blinded by your TR hate boner, but whatever.

Would your answers be the same for Lauren Southern's treatment at the hands of UK authorities?

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12373
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2468

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:18 am

MarcusAu wrote:
Driftless wrote:
InfraRedBucket wrote:
Fri Aug 03, 2018 7:48 am
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Driftless wrote:
feathers wrote:
Shatterface wrote:
Thu Aug 02, 2018 11:11 am
Driftless wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:
screwtape wrote: [quote="John D" post_id=471973 time= user_id=181]
It gets even tougher to love your neighbor when you barley speak a similar language.
I don't know wheat you mean.
Realy? I thought the point was a-maize-ing in it's clarity.
I think it goes against the grain.

Or maybe he spelt it wrong?
Cereally folks, these corny puns are making my ear-ache and my bran hurt.

Any more and I'll hop it.
Yeah let's put a firm end to this.
Or start a bran new discussion just for this.
I doubt any of you have the moral fibre for that.
Enough of your strawman arguments.
Not so fast -- there is a germ of truth in what he says.
I'm going to blame John D - he planted the seed.
[/quote]
You reap what you sow.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2469

Post by Shatterface » Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:32 am

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Well, I think you're blinded by your TR hate boner, but whatever.

Would your answers be the same for Lauren Southern's treatment at the hands of UK authorities?
I think she should be free to speak in the U.K.

I also think if she committed contempt of court for the second time and had a history of violence I wouldn't give her a pass.

I'm not the one blinded by a boner here.

Robinson pled guilty the first time round and the second time round. I give it a few months before he does it again, again pleads guilty, and the conspiracy nuts start bleating again.

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2470

Post by DrokkIt » Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:50 am

Has anyone got any evidence whatsoever about how badly Robinson got treated in prison, that isn't something he himself has said?

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2471

Post by DrokkIt » Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:54 am

Has anyone else considered that the narrative that the UK government is on a specific project of protecting Islam AND the narrative that the prisons are overrun with Islam are somewhat self-contradictory?

Is it possible that as stupid as we may think it to be, hatespeech laws here aren't designed to protect Islam? If not then why was Dankula tried for insulting Jews?

Can we please get this fucking bollocks to be at least a bit reflective of the facts and not just pure void-screaming bias.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2472

Post by Ape+lust » Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:55 am

Really, Peez? I thought "cuck(old)" was an epithet no Marx-fearing justice warrior would use. Like "soyboy."

The rest sounds like classic Zvan, pomposity driving her into a bone-headed misreading of a situation.

https://imgur.com/FzcUOJo.png

https://twitter.com/RichardCCarrier/sta ... 6751571968

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2473

Post by Ape+lust » Fri Aug 03, 2018 10:01 am

Peer-reviewed PSA:


Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2474

Post by Shatterface » Fri Aug 03, 2018 10:09 am

DrokkIt wrote: Has anyone got any evidence whatsoever about how badly Robinson got treated in prison, that isn't something he himself has said?
Believe the victim!

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10154
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2475

Post by Steersman » Fri Aug 03, 2018 10:27 am

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: WEIT post on the defenders of Sarah Jeong claiming reverse racism is impossible:

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... e-racists/

The usual SJW suspects are commenting that 'privilege plus prejudice' really is a thing.
As Jerry has declared me to be persona non grata at his blog, you, or others here, might want to reference, quote, or link an oldie-but-a-goldie from the heydays of the late but unlamented AtheismPlus:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160507082 ... f=7&t=2632

AtheismPlus_Glossary_Y160507A_Full1A.jpg
(110.35 KiB) Downloaded 171 times

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10154
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2476

Post by Steersman » Fri Aug 03, 2018 10:30 am

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: <snippety-doo-dah x a gazllion ...>

You reap what you sow.
Think it's about time to leave that field fallow, put the horses out to pasture there rather than flogging them to death ...

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2477

Post by DrokkIt » Fri Aug 03, 2018 10:33 am

Shatterface wrote:
DrokkIt wrote: Has anyone got any evidence whatsoever about how badly Robinson got treated in prison, that isn't something he himself has said?
Believe the victim!
Like I've no doubt you can get proper roughed up in the nick, but a lot of these claims are pretty extraordinary... if a bit milder than the death sentence that people said was given.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10154
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2478

Post by Steersman » Fri Aug 03, 2018 10:56 am

Maybe something to warm the cockles of the hearts of those here who are laying various types of pipes ... ;-)




free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 10313
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2479

Post by free thoughtpolice » Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:03 am

DrokkIt wrote:
Shatterface wrote:
DrokkIt wrote: Has anyone got any evidence whatsoever about how badly Robinson got treated in prison, that isn't something he himself has said?
Believe the victim!
Like I've no doubt you can get proper roughed up in the nick, but a lot of these claims are pretty extraordinary... if a bit milder than the death sentence that people said was given.
Maybe he had the wrong type of tattoos? I hear that can get you in trouble in prison. At least he didn't get his wig split.

Bhurzum
Brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead
Posts: 3962
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:08 am
Location: Lurking in a dumpster
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2480

Post by Bhurzum » Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:04 am

DrokkIt wrote:
Shatterface wrote:
DrokkIt wrote: Has anyone got any evidence whatsoever about how badly Robinson got treated in prison, that isn't something he himself has said?
Believe the victim!
Like I've no doubt you can get proper roughed up in the nick, but a lot of these claims are pretty extraordinary... if a bit milder than the death sentence that people said was given.



CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2481

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:22 am

d4m10n wrote:
Fri Aug 03, 2018 6:54 am


Krauss out, PZ does a little dance.
Have the investigations finished, or have they preemptively decided he was either guilty or a liability?

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2482

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:24 am

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:36 am
WEIT post on the defenders of Sarah Jeong claiming reverse racism is impossible:

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... e-racists/

The usual SJW suspects are commenting that 'privilege plus prejudice' really is a thing.
That would appear especially stupid in the case of Asians, who seem to be the most advantaged in our society.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2483

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:25 am

Shatterface wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Well, I think you're blinded by your TR hate boner, but whatever.

Would your answers be the same for Lauren Southern's treatment at the hands of UK authorities?
I think she should be free to speak in the U.K.

I also think if she committed contempt of court for the second time and had a history of violence I wouldn't give her a pass.

I'm not the one blinded by a boner here.

Robinson pled guilty the first time round and the second time round. I give it a few months before he does it again, again pleads guilty, and the conspiracy nuts start bleating again.
I've not followed this very closely, but wasn't Robinson released early due to irregularities in his trial?

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7071
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2484

Post by MarcusAu » Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:28 am

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:36 am
WEIT post on the defenders of Sarah Jeong claiming reverse racism is impossible:

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... e-racists/

The usual SJW suspects are commenting that 'privilege plus prejudice' really is a thing.
That would appear especially stupid in the case of Asians, who seem to be the most advantaged in our society.
I've heard that they don't always measure up.

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2485

Post by DrokkIt » Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:30 am

free thoughtpolice wrote:
DrokkIt wrote:
Shatterface wrote:
DrokkIt wrote: Has anyone got any evidence whatsoever about how badly Robinson got treated in prison, that isn't something he himself has said?
Believe the victim!
Like I've no doubt you can get proper roughed up in the nick, but a lot of these claims are pretty extraordinary... if a bit milder than the death sentence that people said was given.
Maybe he had the wrong type of tattoos? I hear that can get you in trouble in prison. At least he didn't get his wig split.
TR has the distinct air of someone who got caught peter-gazing and got his cheeks bust imo

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2486

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:31 am

MarcusAu wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:36 am
WEIT post on the defenders of Sarah Jeong claiming reverse racism is impossible:

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... e-racists/

The usual SJW suspects are commenting that 'privilege plus prejudice' really is a thing.
That would appear especially stupid in the case of Asians, who seem to be the most advantaged in our society.
I've heard that they don't always measure up.
Is this then to be the measure of men?

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 10313
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2487

Post by free thoughtpolice » Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:39 am

It looks like there will be a rally held in DC on the anniversary of last year's Charlottesville march.
https://wtop.com/virginia/2018/08/charl ... y/slide/1/


ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6447
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2489

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:40 pm

Shatterface wrote:
DrokkIt wrote: Has anyone got any evidence whatsoever about how badly Robinson got treated in prison, that isn't something he himself has said?
Believe the victim!
I certainly don't believe the little fella's claim that he lost 40lbs while inside. He's skinnier, sure, but put 40lbs on him and he'd be spherical. And he refused his family's money to buy more grub just to make a point? Many virgins will surely be the reward for such hard-won martyrdom.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12373
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2490

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Fri Aug 03, 2018 2:04 pm

Shatterface wrote: I'm not the one blinded by a boner here.
My boner casts shadows Eratosthenes would've found useful.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 10313
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2491

Post by free thoughtpolice » Fri Aug 03, 2018 2:09 pm

I think TR just liked the idea of making his own Tuna Casserole instead of eating prison food, especially English prison food. Apparently the bodybuilders in prison find it builds muscles. He got skinny because he didn't know how to do proper carb loading.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12373
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2492

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Fri Aug 03, 2018 2:12 pm

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: I've not followed this very closely, but wasn't Robinson released early due to irregularities in his trial?
Shh. You're spoiling the narrative. Also, Tommy was treated like royalty, despite being a thick hooligan who deserved everything that didn't actually happen to him, including the conviction that hasn't been overturned.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12373
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2493

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Fri Aug 03, 2018 2:16 pm

Ape+lust wrote: Really, Peez? I thought "cuck(old)" was an epithet no Marx-fearing justice warrior would use. Like "soyboy."

The rest sounds like classic Zvan, pomposity driving her into a bone-headed misreading of a situation.

https://imgur.com/FzcUOJo.png

https://twitter.com/RichardCCarrier/sta ... 6751571968
The family that jizzes together sticks together.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16640
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2494

Post by Brive1987 » Fri Aug 03, 2018 2:19 pm

Shatterface wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Well, I think you're blinded by your TR hate boner, but whatever.

Would your answers be the same for Lauren Southern's treatment at the hands of UK authorities?
Robinson pled guilty the first time round and the second time round.
That is disputed

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2495

Post by shoutinghorse » Fri Aug 03, 2018 2:30 pm

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: And he refused his family's money to buy more grub just to make a point? Many virgins will surely be the reward for such hard-won martyrdom.


He didn't refuse his families offer for more money you plum he was refused permission to spend more than £12 per week.


Sulman
.
.
Posts: 1997
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2496

Post by Sulman » Fri Aug 03, 2018 2:41 pm

It's such a shame Sharon Hill suffers from internet skeptic personality syndrome because she's really quite fit.

I seem to remember her being rather cool during the rift but a recent glance at her timeline reveals she's gone all Gurdur.

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2497

Post by shoutinghorse » Fri Aug 03, 2018 2:45 pm

Engineers, Doctors, Scientists,




John D
.
.
Posts: 4562
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2498

Post by John D » Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:06 pm

shoutinghorse wrote:
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: And he refused his family's money to buy more grub just to make a point? Many virgins will surely be the reward for such hard-won martyrdom.


He didn't refuse his families offer for more money you plum he was refused permission to spend more than £12 per week.

In his other interview he said he didn't want his family to pay for more food. He is intentionally deceptive here. I think it was in the Tucker Carlson interview where he said he refused the offer from his family for more money.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16640
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2499

Post by Brive1987 » Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:24 pm

Just listened to the Tucker interview for 8 mins. Didn’t hear that reference.

Given the donations, I doubt his family would have to stump up tuna money.

Time stamp please.


Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16640
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2500

Post by Brive1987 » Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:25 pm

Ie I listened to the whole interview.

Guest_b8931fdb

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2501

Post by Guest_b8931fdb » Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:25 pm

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:40 pm
And he refused his family's money to buy more grub just to make a point? Many virgins will surely be the reward for such hard-won martyrdom.
It's not a bad point. Being adequately and safely fed without having to have family members pay extra is a basic requirement of any humane prison.

InfraRedBucket
.
.
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2502

Post by InfraRedBucket » Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:33 pm

MWSnap137 2018-08-04, 00_31_17.jpg
(47.79 KiB) Downloaded 97 times
A woman has become the first person in Denmark to be charged with wearing a face veil in public, after a ban came into effect on Wednesday.

Local media report a 28-year-old woman was fined after getting into a scuffle with a woman trying to remove her veil.

Police say they were called and when they reviewed CCTV, informed the woman she would be charged if she refused to take her niqab off.

The new law has provoked protests and criticism from human rights groups.

It was officially introduced on Wednesday after it passed in Denmark's parliament earlier this year.

It does not mention burkas and niqabs by name, but says "anyone who wears a garment that hides the face in public will be punished with a fine".

On Wednesday night protesters gathered in the capital to demonstrate against law, with women in traditional burqas and veils standing alongside people with makeshift coverings.

Friday's incident is reported to have taken place at a shopping centre in Horsholm, 25km (15 miles) north of Copenhagen.


Police told local media that they were called to the shopping centre after a fight had broken out.

They said both women were charged with violating the peace and said one had also been charged with violating the full-face veil law.

She was given a 1,000 kroner fine ($160; £120) after refusing to take it off at their request.

Some Muslim women have said they will not adhere to the law - which carries a 10,000 ($1,500; £1,200) kroner penalty for repeat offenders.

Human Rights Watch has labelled the ban "discriminatory" and said it was the "latest in a harmful trend."

Last year the European Court of Human Rights upheld a similar Belgian ban, saying that communal harmony trumped an individual's right to religious expression.

Full or partial bans are also in place in France, Austria, Bulgaria and the German state of Bavaria.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45064237


Stankeye
.
.
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2504

Post by Stankeye » Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:59 pm

InfraRedBucket wrote: MWSnap137 2018-08-04, 00_31_17.jpg
A woman has become the first person in Denmark to be charged with wearing a face veil in public, after a ban came into effect on Wednesday.

Local media report a 28-year-old woman was fined after getting into a scuffle with a woman trying to remove her veil.

Police say they were called and when they reviewed CCTV, informed the woman she would be charged if she refused to take her niqab off.

The new law has provoked protests and criticism from human rights groups.

It was officially introduced on Wednesday after it passed in Denmark's parliament earlier this year.

It does not mention burkas and niqabs by name, but says "anyone who wears a garment that hides the face in public will be punished with a fine".

On Wednesday night protesters gathered in the capital to demonstrate against law, with women in traditional burqas and veils standing alongside people with makeshift coverings.

Friday's incident is reported to have taken place at a shopping centre in Horsholm, 25km (15 miles) north of Copenhagen.


Police told local media that they were called to the shopping centre after a fight had broken out.

They said both women were charged with violating the peace and said one had also been charged with violating the full-face veil law.

She was given a 1,000 kroner fine ($160; £120) after refusing to take it off at their request.

Some Muslim women have said they will not adhere to the law - which carries a 10,000 ($1,500; £1,200) kroner penalty for repeat offenders.

Human Rights Watch has labelled the ban "discriminatory" and said it was the "latest in a harmful trend."

Last year the European Court of Human Rights upheld a similar Belgian ban, saying that communal harmony trumped an individual's right to religious expression.

Full or partial bans are also in place in France, Austria, Bulgaria and the German state of Bavaria.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45064237
This is interesting from my perspective as I thought Europe more Progressive. Is this a right wing move or has the move come from the center considering it needed to be passed into law. Is it based on a reaction to an incident or was it hedged as freedom for women?

John D
.
.
Posts: 4562
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2505

Post by John D » Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:04 pm

Brive1987 wrote: Just listened to the Tucker interview for 8 mins. Didn’t hear that reference.

Given the donations, I doubt his family would have to stump up tuna money.

Time stamp please.

Yeah.... I listened to both videos again.... I think I am just plain wrong. Sorry yall. Bad on me. This is what I deserve for working while listening to videos. I suck at multitasking. This is even more outrageous than I originally thought It sounds like he couldn't spend any more money, even if provided by his family.

Guest_b8931fdb

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2506

Post by Guest_b8931fdb » Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:06 pm



hey, he's back

John D
.
.
Posts: 4562
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2507

Post by John D » Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:13 pm

Or was the video re-edited so that now TR does not make the original claim. I swear I heard him say he refused to take more money from his family. I don't think I made this up.... so.... did someone edit the original video? I am starting to think that is exactly what happened. TR made one statement that said is family wanted to give him money to buy more food but he refused, because it wasn't his family's fault. I really doubt I made this up in my head. I fucking hate the internet.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2508

Post by Shatterface » Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:14 pm

Anyone can send money to a prisoner. They can keep up to £500 in their account. If Robinson is too proud to accept a few quid to buy something above what the prison supplies for every other prisoner maybe he shouldn't grovel when it comes time to crowd fund his appeal.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 10313
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2509

Post by free thoughtpolice » Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:18 pm

John D wrote: Or was the video re-edited so that now TR does not make the original claim. I swear I heard him say he refused to take more money from his family. I don't think I made this up.... so.... did someone edit the original video? I am starting to think that is exactly what happened. TR made one statement that said is family wanted to give him money to buy more food but he refused, because it wasn't his family's fault. I really doubt I made this up in my head. I fucking hate the internet.
I thought I had heard that or read that too. Possibly something someone else said or tweeted. Caolon Robertson?

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2510

Post by Shatterface » Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:20 pm

How can someone who has lived in nothing but water and toe-nail clippings be so full of shit?

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2511

Post by Shatterface » Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:21 pm

Feel free to donate when he goes back inside:

https://www.gov.uk/send-prisoner-money

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2512

Post by DrokkIt » Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:22 pm

Shatterface wrote: Anyone can send money to a prisoner. They can keep up to £500 in their account. If Robinson is too proud to accept a few quid to buy something above what the prison supplies for every other prisoner maybe he shouldn't grovel when it comes time to crowd fund his appeal.
It's almost like coming out thin and haggard looking... helps his career or something?

If anyone flat-out believes every bit of convenient conspiracy tosh coming out of TR's gob I've got a couple of bridges to sell you.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 10313
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2513

Post by free thoughtpolice » Fri Aug 03, 2018 4:28 pm

btw. TR maintains that his cell was directly adjacent to a mosque and a main walkway in the prison.
If true, this looks like the prison staff is trying to allow him to be harassed or worse which would be reprehensible. The prison should take reasonable steps to insure the prisoners general safety and well being.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12373
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2514

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:22 pm

A woman has become the first person in Denmark to be charged with wearing a face veil in public
Well, it wasn't gonna be a man, now was it?

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12373
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2515

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:25 pm

Human Rights Watch has labelled the ban "discriminatory" and said it was the "latest in a harmful trend.
Oh, fuck off. In Iran, you get 15 years in prison for not wearing the damn thing.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6447
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2516

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:39 pm

free thoughtpolice wrote: btw. TR maintains that his cell was directly adjacent to a mosque and a main walkway in the prison.
If true, this looks like the prison staff is trying to allow him to be harassed or worse which would be reprehensible. The prison should take reasonable steps to insure the prisoners general safety and well being.
He also claims that he was held in solitary for an extended period, which the Prison Service have denied.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6447
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2517

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:41 pm

John D wrote: Or was the video re-edited so that now TR does not make the original claim. I swear I heard him say he refused to take more money from his family. I don't think I made this up.... so.... did someone edit the original video? I am starting to think that is exactly what happened. TR made one statement that said is family wanted to give him money to buy more food but he refused, because it wasn't his family's fault. I really doubt I made this up in my head. I fucking hate the internet.
I made the original claim here, and I am with you: I could have sworn I heard it on either this video or his few brief words to Sky as he left the jail. We're either mad, or we've read a comment by some Tommy supporter and have absorbed it as truth. I'd rather the first option than to be so stupid that the second is true.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 10313
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2518

Post by free thoughtpolice » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:43 pm

In more whale news, the local vandal dolphin/whale that has been doing the the local fishery a good deed by swimming around Comox Bay and eating the seals that are a total nuisance and committing genocide on the local salmon. The (deep state) fuckers lured him out of the bay because the local boaters were somewhat inconvenienced as well as the weekend fireworks display.
https://www.mycomoxvalleynow.com/39429/ ... ecordings/

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16640
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2519

Post by Brive1987 » Fri Aug 03, 2018 6:59 pm

Shatterface wrote: Anyone can send money to a prisoner. They can keep up to £500 in their account. If Robinson is too proud to accept a few quid to buy something above what the prison supplies for every other prisoner maybe he shouldn't grovel when it comes time to crowd fund his appeal.
I’m assuming wages were out of the question while in solitary defensive lockdown.

http://i.imgur.com/MGecvfy.jpg

Your stupidity is a never ending source of amusement.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 10313
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2520

Post by free thoughtpolice » Fri Aug 03, 2018 7:20 pm

Your stupidity is a never ending source of amusement.
Classy!

Locked