Fuck off, Jamie!

Old subthreads
Locked
CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2581

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Thanks, Mudbroker.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2582

Post by Ape+lust »

Further, since Peez now claims that everyone knew what a perv Krauss was, it means he's forgotten about the time he postured as a skeptic and wouldn't accept evidence that was making Zvan soggy.

https://imgur.com/vWhJd3M.png

https://imgur.com/SLRuMG1.png

If he wasn't such a disingenuous shit, I'd almost say he should be commended. It's dangerous to thwart Zvan's retributive lust.

https://imgur.com/xFc7FHp.png

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2583

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Svan was always the worst of the bunch. The fact that she's polyamorous should keep anybody on a diet.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2584

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »



At least some American law enforcement know the score.

Guest_b8931fdb

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2585

Post by Guest_b8931fdb »

MarcusAu wrote:
Thu Aug 02, 2018 3:38 pm
So...has anyone been watching the Syfy series Happy! ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K60kfc-k-8g
Wow, that third episode ranks up there with some of the darkest shit I've ever watched. I mean good, but, wow.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2586

Post by MarcusAu »

Keating wrote:
Sat Aug 04, 2018 3:27 pm
I think pride marches have well passed their necessity of breaking the back of Christian intolerance, and are now doing more harm than good in most places. They should be ended. The only place where it seems to me they might still have a place if they were held in Muslim majority neighbourhoods. Can't do that, though. That would be racist.
To view these events purely in terms of their utility to piss off those you have disagreement with does a disservice to the other reasons people have to attend.

And if they are to be ended the question is how. Governments already have the powers to stop just about any march or demonstration should they feel the need to. So you could vote in those with the will to put a stop to such things. Or you could start the modern equivalent of a Temperance League. But I'll not be standing with the wowsers on that one.

nb I'm speaking as someone who regularly does not attend Pride or St Patricks Day or Canivale or Fat Tuesday parades - so I don't really have a dog in this fight.

SM1957
.
.
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2587

Post by SM1957 »

Bhurzum wrote:
Sat Aug 04, 2018 6:34 pm
Dank on leftist comedy...

We must remember that violent video games do not cause people to be violent,and only religious nuts would say otherwise, but telling jokes about gay people is literally inciting people to go out and kill gays.

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2588

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

We had a Pride parade here in Nice yesterday. I didn't attend because I try to avoid large crowds these days.

But beside making the traffic a tad more difficult, there's nothing wrong with a Pride parade. After the past struggles they had to face, LGBTQs deserve it.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2589

Post by MarcusAu »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: We had a Pride parade here in Nice yesterday. I didn't attend because I try to avoid large crowds these days.

But beside making the traffic a tad more difficult, there's nothing wrong with a Pride parade. After the past struggles they had to face, LGBTQs deserve it.
And, you know, sometimes people like to have fun.

Keating
.
.
Posts: 2421
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: South of anteater guy

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2590

Post by Keating »

That's the point. No one cares anymore, so there is a segment that sees escalation as necessary, which is why you see furries and worse. There's something about rubbing Christians noses in it that won't be done to Muslims that I'm uncomfortable with. Treat people equally; don't refuse to rub your bare-arse in front of some people because you don't wish to offend them.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2591

Post by Brive1987 »

Keating wrote: That's the point. No one cares anymore, so there is a segment that sees escalation as necessary, which is why you see furries and worse. There's something about rubbing Christians noses in it that won't be done to Muslims that I'm uncomfortable with. Treat people equally; don't refuse to rub your bare-arse in front of some people because you don't wish to offend them.
The political aspect should be redundant, it’s like environmentalism in the built environment. It used to be a seperate thing to cultivate and hold conferences on etc. Now it is expected to be a standard part of any topic.

In a way the need to hold aggressive in your face marches might be a positive thing. It demonstrates that atypical social units (outside the traditional community dynamic) do not (yet) hold equivalency with traditional forms. :mrgreen:

On another note. I actually feel sorry for this NZ interviewer who felt like intellectual road kill after dealing with Southern and SM.


Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2592

Post by Brive1987 »

I am currently researching the vexing issue of how the 8 deep classical Greek hoplite phalanx actually fought.

Critical questions include whether spears were wielded over or under handed, how the phalanx avoided falling over while advancing over slippery bodies, how amateur soldiers could maintain formation while charging 300 style across undulating terrain and what exactly did ranks 3-8 do with their spears given they couldn’t reach the enemy. And the eternal question. Was the Othismos (push) like a rugby scrum or was it something far more fluid.

Carry on.

There is quite the historic pit fight going on that would shame the energy expended here on ethnic-babes.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2593

Post by Ape+lust »

Shrimp, ahoy! First blog post in 2 years. He's still a self-pitying grump. Still has a degree from Oxford. And still is "not normatively employable."

And yeah, he got rid of the floofy combover. Plus, most of his eyebrows.

https://imgur.com/H1gadyd.png

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2594

Post by shoutinghorse »

End of an era :(

R.I.P. Barry .... "To Me To You To You To Me"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-45074955

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2595

Post by Ape+lust »

Bhurzum wrote: Could "Tatcalling" be the next big thing?


It's the age we live in. People are crude and lewd.

A bald-headed bristleback can't walk anywhere without someone trying to take a snap of their hanging 'nads :shock:

https://imgur.com/KuBu8Jt.png

https://twitter.com/DanielleMuscato/sta ... 0609284096

It makes me weep for women. Especially ones who look like New Jersey fight promoters, circa 1955.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2596

Post by Brive1987 »

A Ju52 has crashed in the Swiss alps killing 20. Unconfirmed white nationalist sources indicate it was brought down by a Turkish national for unintentionally laying pipes.

http://www.whitenationnetwork.com/archives/67200

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2597

Post by Brive1987 »

Ape+lust wrote: Shrimp, ahoy! First blog post in 2 years. He's still a self-pitying grump. Still has a degree from Oxford. And still is "not normatively employable."

And yeah, he got rid of the floofy combover. Plus, most of his eyebrows.

https://imgur.com/H1gadyd.png
I see his last few strands migrated to his chin.

He looks like a grey.

Hunt
.
.
Posts: 3282
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2598

Post by Hunt »

Ape+lust wrote: It makes me weep for women. Especially ones who look like New Jersey fight promoters, circa 1955.
There was a time when he was somewhat robustly handsome. He should have kept the look.

https://daniellemuscato.startlogic.com/ ... 1_orig.jpg

These days he looks more like Al Capone in drag.

Hunt
.
.
Posts: 3282
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2599

Post by Hunt »

Brive1987 wrote: He looks like a grey.
Take him to your leader.

SM1957
.
.
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2600

Post by SM1957 »

The police in Britain have to be very careful.

They now ring up to ask if it is OK to have a 12 year old girlfriend.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/forc ... -3ngwf9cm2

SM1957
.
.
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2601

Post by SM1957 »

shoutinghorse wrote: End of an era :(

R.I.P. Barry .... "To Me To You To You To Me"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-45074955
It is time for Lee Mack to step up and carry on the Chuckle Brothers tradition.

SM1957
.
.
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2602

Post by SM1957 »

Hunt wrote:
Ape+lust wrote: It makes me weep for women. Especially ones who look like New Jersey fight promoters, circa 1955.
There was a time when he was somewhat robustly handsome. He should have kept the look.

https://daniellemuscato.startlogic.com/ ... 1_orig.jpg

These days he looks more like Al Capone in drag.
The peculiar thing is that she does actually suit a beard. You can't say that about many women, but the beard looks good on her.

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2603

Post by shoutinghorse »

Bhurzum wrote:
Sat Aug 04, 2018 6:52 pm
Could "Tatcalling" be the next big thing?

Called 'Tramp Stamps' in my house.

https://i.imgur.com/mHeTSel.png

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2604

Post by MarcusAu »

Keating wrote: That's the point. No one cares anymore, so there is a segment that sees escalation as necessary, which is why you see furries and worse. There's something about rubbing Christians noses in it that won't be done to Muslims that I'm uncomfortable with. Treat people equally; don't refuse to rub your bare-arse in front of some people because you don't wish to offend them.
It would seem that you have some sympathy for the left's position that it is (or should be) inherently political to be gay. You may also wish to polish the 'let's you and him fight' rhetoric if you intend on selling it to the organisers of the next Pride event or Sydney Mardi Gras.

Can you really not think of any other reason that people would want to attend such an event other than to rub it in the noses of whatever particular religious sect they (or you) want to piss off?

nb I've seen Furries (though perhaps not worse), outside in public. Beyond mild amusement, I can't say I really gave a shit.

Service Dog
.
.
Posts: 8652
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2605

Post by Service Dog »

Ape+lust wrote:
A bald-headed bristleback can't walk anywhere without someone trying to take a snap of their hanging 'nads :shock:

https://imgur.com/KuBu8Jt.png

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2606

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »


MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2607

Post by MarcusAu »

Brive1987 wrote: I am currently researching the vexing issue of how the 8 deep classical Greek hoplite phalanx actually fought.

Critical questions include whether spears were wielded over or under handed, how the phalanx avoided falling over while advancing over slippery bodies, how amateur soldiers could maintain formation while charging 300 style across undulating terrain and what exactly did ranks 3-8 do with their spears given they couldn’t reach the enemy. And the eternal question. Was the Othismos (push) like a rugby scrum or was it something far more fluid.

Carry on.

There is quite the historic pit fight going on that would shame the energy expended here on ethnic-babes.
Be wary of quoting Herodotus as a source - his track record is variable.

John D
.
.
Posts: 5966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2608

Post by John D »

Hunt wrote:
Sat Aug 04, 2018 3:56 pm
free thoughtpolice wrote: Have these assholes been arrested yet, and if not why not?
I saw that a few months ago. Why they're not doing time for attempted murder is beyond me. All the protestations of "oh no, oh no, oh no!!" aside.
Haha. These guys are doing a public service. My mom once chased a guy down our street who stole our bike. Fortunately the tires were not fully inflated and she caught him. He ran off while she screamed at him. Nice.

I think it would be better if these bike thieves had be shot or electrocuted or something like that... but... most people do not share my opinion on this.

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2609

Post by shoutinghorse »

No more boys and girls.

https://i.imgur.com/NgD70Rk.png
https://i.imgur.com/jw0r9gV.png


(Spotted at a leisure centre in Bournemouth, Southern England)

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2610

Post by Tigzy »

Ape+lust wrote: Shrimp, ahoy! First blog post in 2 years. He's still a self-pitying grump. Still has a degree from Oxford. And still is "not normatively employable."

And yeah, he got rid of the floofy combover. Plus, most of his eyebrows.

https://imgur.com/H1gadyd.png
:lol: :lol: :lol: He looks like he was grown in a vat.

Which is kind of appropriate, really.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2611

Post by free thoughtpolice »

John D wrote:
Haha. These guys are doing a public service
They are a gang of immature sociopaths that are setting up booby traps that (shown) break bones and have the potential to cause permanent injury like head injuries or a broken neck, even death.
These assholes aren't dispensing justice, they are a bunch of sadists that have figured out a stunt to hurt people that won't phone the cops on them because they are also breaking the law.

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2612

Post by shoutinghorse »

free thoughtpolice wrote: John D wrote:
Haha. These guys are doing a public service
They are a gang of immature sociopaths that are setting up booby traps that (shown) break bones and have the potential to cause permanent injury like head injuries or a broken neck, even death.
These assholes aren't dispensing justice, they are a bunch of sadists that have figured out a stunt to hurt people that won't phone the cops on them because they are also breaking the law.
Don't steal, don't get hurt. Simples.

Yes it's childish, yes someone could get seriously hurt and yes technically they're breaking the law but I suspect what has motivated this along with the desire for YouTube clicks is they've probably had bikes stolen themselves and as usual the police don't want to know. Funnily enough, watching it did bring out the sadist in me and I was kind of hoping for blood and broken bones. :twisted:

Fatty, bouncing down the road though, C'mon :lol:

John D
.
.
Posts: 5966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2613

Post by John D »

free thoughtpolice wrote: John D wrote:
Haha. These guys are doing a public service
They are a gang of immature sociopaths that are setting up booby traps that (shown) break bones and have the potential to cause permanent injury like head injuries or a broken neck, even death.
These assholes aren't dispensing justice, they are a bunch of sadists that have figured out a stunt to hurt people that won't phone the cops on them because they are also breaking the law.
Many good and hard working people rely on their bikes to get to work and just survive from day to day. Insane, violet, and hurtful people steal bikes without a thought in some areas. The police do nothing. They don't even try to find stolen bikes.

It is easy to dismiss bike theft as something trivial, but I think it is a bit more like someone stealing a cowboy's horse. This is a high crime in my opinion and I feel a sense of satisfaction at people being injured while committing this kind of crime.

Yes.... I would be a tyrant if I had any real political power. It is a good thing I am not a communist dictator because I would put Stalin to shame.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2614

Post by free thoughtpolice »

TR should get the death sentence. Don't ignore court orders and you won't get raped to death by a muslim prison gang. Simples.
At least he got a trial of sorts, and even an appeal.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2615

Post by free thoughtpolice »

From PZ's celebration of Krauss getting sacked for alleged boob grabbing:
http://archive.is/BgRdq
Giliell, professional cynic -Ilk-
5 August 2018 at 9:35 am
I find these “I never felt the urge to grope a woman’s breasts” claims annoying and full of hypocrisy.
When will you hetero dudes stop pretending that your lust for women’s breasts is a natural and uncontrollable phenomenon when we absolutely know it’s not true?
Breasts haven’t always been and aren’t everywhere considered sexually attractive. For a long time they were exclusively considered signs of a cis woman’s ability to feed offspring. In many parts of the world women run around topless and nobody gives a rat’s ass because there tits are just that
Now I feel dirty and unnatural for my long time lusting after (cis) women's breasts. It would have served me right if they were booby trapped :drool: and had cut my fingers off.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2616

Post by free thoughtpolice »


SM1957
.
.
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2617

Post by SM1957 »

free thoughtpolice wrote: TR should get the death sentence. Don't ignore court orders and you won't get raped to death by a muslim prison gang. Simples.
At least he got a trial of sorts, and even an appeal.
A good rule for us all there.

Always ask the police if what you are doing is lawful. Check more than once with the police, just to be sure that you are not getting into trouble.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2618

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

shoutinghorse wrote: No more boys and girls.

https://i.imgur.com/NgD70Rk.png
https://i.imgur.com/jw0r9gV.png


(Spotted at a leisure centre in Bournemouth, Southern England)
By you, or was this reported somewhere?

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2619

Post by MarcusAu »

I thought that referring to human beings of the distaff persuasion as 'female' had been declared verboten.

Driftless
.
.
Posts: 533
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 8:13 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2620

Post by Driftless »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
shoutinghorse wrote: No more boys and girls.

https://i.imgur.com/NgD70Rk.png
https://i.imgur.com/jw0r9gV.png


(Spotted at a leisure centre in Bournemouth, Southern England)
By you, or was this reported somewhere?
Don't they mean "assigned male at birth" and "assigned female at birth"?

If these are real someone will probably get fired.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2621

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

An example of open-carry in Florida.

CommanderTuvok
.
.
Posts: 3744
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2622

Post by CommanderTuvok »

:)

InfraRedBucket
.
.
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2623

Post by InfraRedBucket »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: An example of open-carry in Florida.
You got crocs? We got Boa Constrictors,
MWSnap138 2018-08-05, 22_48_29.jpg
(67.57 KiB) Downloaded 180 times
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-45074866

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2624

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Brive1987 wrote: I am currently researching the vexing issue of how the 8 deep classical Greek hoplite phalanx actually fought.

Critical questions include whether spears were wielded over or under handed, how the phalanx avoided falling over while advancing over slippery bodies, how amateur soldiers could maintain formation while charging 300 style across undulating terrain and what exactly did ranks 3-8 do with their spears given they couldn’t reach the enemy. And the eternal question. Was the Othismos (push) like a rugby scrum or was it something far more fluid.

Carry on.

There is quite the historic pit fight going on that would shame the energy expended here on ethnic-babes.
cf. Delbrück's discussion of hoplite formations in Vol. I of Geschichte der Kriegskunst im Rahmen der Politischen Geschichte, based in part in his experiments with Gymnasium students making evolutions armed with spears.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2625

Post by Brive1987 »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: I am currently researching the vexing issue of how the 8 deep classical Greek hoplite phalanx actually fought.

Critical questions include whether spears were wielded over or under handed, how the phalanx avoided falling over while advancing over slippery bodies, how amateur soldiers could maintain formation while charging 300 style across undulating terrain and what exactly did ranks 3-8 do with their spears given they couldn’t reach the enemy. And the eternal question. Was the Othismos (push) like a rugby scrum or was it something far more fluid.

Carry on.

There is quite the historic pit fight going on that would shame the energy expended here on ethnic-babes.
cf. Delbrück's discussion of hoplite formations in Vol. I of Geschichte der Kriegskunst im Rahmen der Politischen Geschichte, based in part in his experiments with Gymnasium students making evolutions armed with spears.
Hmmm. Thanks.

And I thought this was the definitive study:

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2626

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... irlfriend/
A police officer phoned a charity to ask whether it was “culturally acceptable” for an Iraqi paedophile to have a 12-year-old girlfriend.

The detective had arrested the 26-year-old man but wanted to be “culturally sensitive” after the suspect said the relationship was acceptable in his community. Karma Nirvana, the charity that took the call, told the officer to deal with the man as he would any other suspected child abuser.

The charity, which works with victims of forced marriage, said that the case showed the danger of officers whose professional judgment was clouded by fear of being called racist.

The call log, shared with The Times, says that the policeman asked for advice because “the accused is stating that it is ‘completely acceptable in my culture to be with a 12-year-old’.” It says the officer “ ‘just wished to know if it is accepted in Iraqi culture to be with a 12-year-old girl’ as he wished to be ‘culturally sensitive’.”

The call adviser replied that no culture or religion could justify such abuse.

Jasvinder Sanghera, the charity’s founder, said there was an attitude of “turning a blind eye because of culture” within the police and councils.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2627

Post by Brive1987 »

Much as I appreciate the Spartan’s progressive views on sexuality, I fear our sacred band is heading down the wrong path ...
A new language guide advises members of the Australian Defence Force to avoid using gender specific words, such as “him” or “her”, as it could be classed as bullying.

The LGBTI guide – which stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex – was written by the Australian Defence Force Academy and distributed among troops in training last year,


free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2628

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Canada asks Saudi Arabia to free atheist blogger Raif Badawi, the KSA throws a tantrum.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/saudi-ara ... -1.4775133

Guest_b8931fdb

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2629

Post by Guest_b8931fdb »



Can anyone here speak or read Arabic and confirm the translation is correct?

ThreeFlangedJavis
.
.
Posts: 2181
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2630

Post by ThreeFlangedJavis »

John D wrote:
Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:11 am
Hunt wrote:
Sat Aug 04, 2018 3:56 pm
free thoughtpolice wrote: Have these assholes been arrested yet, and if not why not?
I saw that a few months ago. Why they're not doing time for attempted murder is beyond me. All the protestations of "oh no, oh no, oh no!!" aside.
Haha. These guys are doing a public service. My mom once chased a guy down our street who stole our bike. Fortunately the tires were not fully inflated and she caught him. He ran off while she screamed at him. Nice.

I think it would be better if these bike thieves had be shot or electrocuted or something like that... but... most people do not share my opinion on this.
No shit. why is that do you think? Perhaps because it is a milder manifestation of the conservative orderliness trait which ends up with the "unclean" being fed into ovens at the extreme.

ThreeFlangedJavis
.
.
Posts: 2181
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2631

Post by ThreeFlangedJavis »

Guest_b8931fdb wrote:
Sun Aug 05, 2018 4:31 pm


Can anyone here speak or read Arabic and confirm the translation is correct?
Had a do-gooder friend forward one of those "we must get the poor waif out now" emails a while back. A quick background check left the impression that she and her family are a bunch of psychos. Why are people so fucking gullible.

Service Dog
.
.
Posts: 8652
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2632

Post by Service Dog »

John D wrote:
Hunt wrote:
Sat Aug 04, 2018 3:56 pm
free thoughtpolice wrote: Have these assholes been arrested yet, and if not why not?
I saw that a few months ago. Why they're not doing time for attempted murder is beyond me. All the protestations of "oh no, oh no, oh no!!" aside.
Haha. These guys are doing a public service. My mom once chased a guy down our street who stole our bike. Fortunately the tires were not fully inflated and she caught him. He ran off while she screamed at him. Nice.

I think it would be better if these bike thieves had be shot or electrocuted or something like that... but... most people do not share my opinion on this.
When I was a messenger, I thought a bike thief was like a horse thief... shoot 'em for fucking with my livelihood.

But...
1. I think those youtube pranks may be faked
2. I have a problem with the bait bikes not-being locked-up. Depending on local laws, the unlocked bike on public property may be considered 'abandoned'.
3. I now own a battery powered angle grinder & if an abandoned-looking bike is sufficiently looted of parts... I chop the lock & rebuild the remaining bike. I rely on my own personal judgement, whether a bike is abandoned/ or simply missing one-or-2 parts... with an owner who intends to repair it.

Guest_b8931fdb

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2633

Post by Guest_b8931fdb »

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote:
Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:15 pm
Guest_b8931fdb wrote:
Sun Aug 05, 2018 4:31 pm


Can anyone here speak or read Arabic and confirm the translation is correct?
Had a do-gooder friend forward one of those "we must get the poor waif out now" emails a while back. A quick background check left the impression that she and her family are a bunch of psychos. Why are people so fucking gullible.
The past 24 hours on twitter I've seen claims that:

1) After being released from jail, Palestinians and Syrians have been harassing her because she gained weight ie, jail was soft, esp. compared to Assad's prisons

2) this tweet where she supposedly says her time was spent

> parties, breakfast potlucks, group lunches, singing, dancing, watching TV, jumping in the rooms, reading books, studying a law course...

I figured the joke account MossadIL wasn't being serious, but the translations show that is indeed what she says (not in that order.)

It's hard to know the video is slowed way down and it's hard to know who translated it.

--

The wapo says
In an afternoon news conference, Ahed said that she completed her high school exams in prison, with the help of other prisoners. Palestinian inmates typically organize study courses to complete high school and even university degrees.

“I will study law to defend my people and defend my Palestinian cause in international forums,” she said.

She said her prison experience was tough, and that she missed her old life in the village and her friends. She said she underwent three lengthy interrogations without a female officer present, in violation of Israel’s own rules.

Keating
.
.
Posts: 2421
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: South of anteater guy

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2634

Post by Keating »

MarcusAu wrote:
Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:26 am
It would seem that you have some sympathy for the left's position that it is (or should be) inherently political to be gay.
Pride marches are inherently political. That was their point. The idea arises out of Stonewall, 50 years ago. Sydney’s Mardi Gras is based on rebelling against police crack downs 40 years ago. All the goals of the movement have been achieved. It’s now got the same problem all political groups eventually get to after achieving their goals. They degenerate into parodies of themselves.
You may also wish to polish the 'let's you and him fight' rhetoric if you intend on selling it to the organisers of the next Pride event or Sydney Mardi Gras.
If it is going to remain in its current form, as a political statement, there is only one way that still makes sense: targeting the one major religion that has virulent anti-gay bigotry. Maybe they could toss themselves off Centrepoint Tower?

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2635

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Service Dog wrote:
John D wrote:
Hunt wrote:
Sat Aug 04, 2018 3:56 pm
free thoughtpolice wrote: Have these assholes been arrested yet, and if not why not?
I saw that a few months ago. Why they're not doing time for attempted murder is beyond me. All the protestations of "oh no, oh no, oh no!!" aside.
Haha. These guys are doing a public service. My mom once chased a guy down our street who stole our bike. Fortunately the tires were not fully inflated and she caught him. He ran off while she screamed at him. Nice.

I think it would be better if these bike thieves had be shot or electrocuted or something like that... but... most people do not share my opinion on this.
When I was a messenger, I thought a bike thief was like a horse thief... shoot 'em for fucking with my livelihood.

But...
1. I think those youtube pranks may be faked
2. I have a problem with the bait bikes not-being locked-up. Depending on local laws, the unlocked bike on public property may be considered 'abandoned'.
3. I now own a battery powered angle grinder & if an abandoned-looking bike is sufficiently looted of parts... I chop the lock & rebuild the remaining bike. I rely on my own personal judgement, whether a bike is abandoned/ or simply missing one-or-2 parts... with an owner who intends to repair it.
Even in Red China they don't excessively punish bike thieves.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2636

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

free thoughtpolice wrote:
Sun Aug 05, 2018 7:02 pm
Service Dog wrote:
John D wrote:
Hunt wrote:
Sat Aug 04, 2018 3:56 pm
free thoughtpolice wrote: Have these assholes been arrested yet, and if not why not?
I saw that a few months ago. Why they're not doing time for attempted murder is beyond me. All the protestations of "oh no, oh no, oh no!!" aside.
Haha. These guys are doing a public service. My mom once chased a guy down our street who stole our bike. Fortunately the tires were not fully inflated and she caught him. He ran off while she screamed at him. Nice.

I think it would be better if these bike thieves had be shot or electrocuted or something like that... but... most people do not share my opinion on this.
When I was a messenger, I thought a bike thief was like a horse thief... shoot 'em for fucking with my livelihood.

But...
1. I think those youtube pranks may be faked
2. I have a problem with the bait bikes not-being locked-up. Depending on local laws, the unlocked bike on public property may be considered 'abandoned'.
3. I now own a battery powered angle grinder & if an abandoned-looking bike is sufficiently looted of parts... I chop the lock & rebuild the remaining bike. I rely on my own personal judgement, whether a bike is abandoned/ or simply missing one-or-2 parts... with an owner who intends to repair it.
Even in Red China they don't excessively punish bike thieves.
I dunno. While I agree the potential harm of those bike pranks was too high, I also have to admit I laughed like a fucker when they smacked pavement or bounced down the hill. I have a very low opinion of thieves, especially those targeting the poor. I wish they'd found a way to entrap thieves without necessarily having the rubber and flesh hit the road.

Hunt
.
.
Posts: 3282
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2637

Post by Hunt »

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote:
John D wrote:
Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:11 am
Hunt wrote:
Sat Aug 04, 2018 3:56 pm
free thoughtpolice wrote: Have these assholes been arrested yet, and if not why not?
I saw that a few months ago. Why they're not doing time for attempted murder is beyond me. All the protestations of "oh no, oh no, oh no!!" aside.
Haha. These guys are doing a public service. My mom once chased a guy down our street who stole our bike. Fortunately the tires were not fully inflated and she caught him. He ran off while she screamed at him. Nice.

I think it would be better if these bike thieves had be shot or electrocuted or something like that... but... most people do not share my opinion on this.
No shit. why is that do you think? Perhaps because it is a milder manifestation of the conservative orderliness trait which ends up with the "unclean" being fed into ovens at the extreme.
Petty theft is annoying, I'll admit that. I've had plenty of small stuff taken from me and the feeling is always shitty. BUT, what these guys are doing is criminal. Two wrongs don't make a right. They're instigating serious accidents. Take another look at the very first fall. That's not fake. I broke a collar bone and punctured my lung in an accident not much more serious.

I'll just say it: anyone who thinks these are justified needs some work done on their moral compass.

SM1957
.
.
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2638

Post by SM1957 »

Keating wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:
Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:26 am
It would seem that you have some sympathy for the left's position that it is (or should be) inherently political to be gay.
Pride marches are inherently political. That was their point. The idea arises out of Stonewall, 50 years ago. Sydney’s Mardi Gras is based on rebelling against police crack downs 40 years ago. All the goals of the movement have been achieved. It’s now got the same problem all political groups eventually get to after achieving their goals. They degenerate into parodies of themselves.
You may also wish to polish the 'let's you and him fight' rhetoric if you intend on selling it to the organisers of the next Pride event or Sydney Mardi Gras.
If it is going to remain in its current form, as a political statement, there is only one way that still makes sense: targeting the one major religion that has virulent anti-gay bigotry. Maybe they could toss themselves off Centrepoint Tower?
I do not want to see gays tossing themselves off in public.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2639

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »



If this succeeds, the humanities are past saving.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#2640

Post by MarcusAu »

Keating wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:
Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:26 am
It would seem that you have some sympathy for the left's position that it is (or should be) inherently political to be gay.
Pride marches are inherently political. That was their point. The idea arises out of Stonewall, 50 years ago. Sydney’s Mardi Gras is based on rebelling against police crack downs 40 years ago. All the goals of the movement have been achieved. It’s now got the same problem all political groups eventually get to after achieving their goals. They degenerate into parodies of themselves.
You may also wish to polish the 'let's you and him fight' rhetoric if you intend on selling it to the organisers of the next Pride event or Sydney Mardi Gras.
If it is going to remain in its current form, as a political statement, there is only one way that still makes sense: targeting the one major religion that has virulent anti-gay bigotry. Maybe they could toss themselves off Centrepoint Tower?
Things can occur for more than one reason. People can attend such events to have fun.

They do not have have an obligation to put themselves in harms way just to make whatever political point you think they should be making.

Locked