free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ https://www.foxnews.com/us/guns-seized- ... gton-state
The group has been advocating for race war as well as training and planning for it apparently.
Nuf ced.Cole was not charged with any crimes at the time.
free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ https://www.foxnews.com/us/guns-seized- ... gton-state
The group has been advocating for race war as well as training and planning for it apparently.
Nuf ced.Cole was not charged with any crimes at the time.
https://www.king5.com/article/news/inve ... f877977340Its white supremacist members claim they will not start the war, but they are arming themselves in preparation.
The FBI gave a judge a 62 page investigation to a judge and had a warrant to get the weapons. His org has shown dangerous behavior including 5 of them committing murder.The problem with red-flag laws is that they could eliminate the rights of many people without trial, or even a search warranty. These laws could work, but I doubt they will.
First, the article says there were "five military-style rifles, three pistols and other gun parts". I know any number of private citizens with more guns than that.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑https://www.foxnews.com/us/guns-seized- ... gton-stateThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑Thanks, interesting, I'll look for an actual news outlet running the story.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 11:49 amThey took this guys guns even though he belonged to a well regulated militia. They aren't even muslims.
https://www.propublica.org/article/atom ... hate-group
The group has been advocating for race war as well as training and planning for it apparently. They call their movement "white jihad". Suppose you have black South Africans in a similar group that want to eliminate whites and are training and planning for it, or a group of muslims that want to kill all the kaffir. Would you want to support their right to collect military style weapons?
And here I thought that part of Griffin's supposed charm was her being a "D lister".As for the stupid talentless Kathy Griffin and that stupid stunt she pulled: she got a visit from the secret service and she basically lost what little of a career she had. Got what she deserved. Meanwhile she didn't openly plan violence , train for it , or set up a nationwide org and recruit others to carry it out. Or for that matter none of her non existent organization actually carried out murder.
of course, the bad reporting on this case shows us a few things. 1) I think none of the weapons are fully automatic...right? Did you read that he had any illegal weapons. 2) The weapons are called 'military style" which really just refers to a rifle with some handles. 3) There is a gun that looks illegally sawed off. So....WTF! Are these weapons illegal? This is one of the most important parts of the story.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ John D wrote:The FBI gave a judge a 62 page investigation to a judge and had a warrant to get the weapons. His org has shown dangerous behavior including 5 of them committing murder.The problem with red-flag laws is that they could eliminate the rights of many people without trial, or even a search warranty. These laws could work, but I doubt they will.
Neighbor of a friend of mine got his guns yanked because he threatened to shoot his good friend that was fucking his hot but slutty wife. Some speech, like talking about and planning to commit a violent crime is not protected speech in Canada or the US. You appear to be minimizing this asshole's behavior, this is not a protected speech matter. Is it not illegal to belong to and support Al Qaeda or ISIS? What about their freedom of speech and association?
You are taking the slippery slope argument which sounds like the arguments so many that oppose any gun regs take. Outlawing weapons like fully automatic weapons hasn't caused everyone in the US to lose their guns.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not some anti-gun crusader. I've had guns and hunted for many years. I'm not in favor of over restrictive regs but there is a point where public safety becomes compromised. Apparently, the red flag law requires a warrant and not just any cop is allowed to enforce or pursue a warrant.I don't know all the details of the law, but it seems at least in this case it was a sensible and fair outcome.
Hell's Angel's members also say they have nothing to do with crime, they are just motorcycle enthusiasts.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑https://www.king5.com/article/news/inve ... f877977340Its white supremacist members claim they will not start the war, but they are arming themselves in preparation.
You make a lot of good points.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑Hell's Angel's members also say they have nothing to do with crime, they are just motorcycle enthusiasts.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑https://www.king5.com/article/news/inve ... f877977340Its white supremacist members claim they will not start the war, but they are arming themselves in preparation.
The dude that threatened to kill his (ex)friend that I mentioned a few posts up didn't get charged with a crime either. They took away his guns for a cooling off period and for better or worse he got back with his wife. They may have saved him from doing a big fuckup.
Judging by the activities of Atomwaffen that is coming to light, such as 5 murders coming from some of their members it wouldn't surprise me if the FBI isn't actively investigating them in order to get them a RICO or a terrorist designation and that is why they had such a detailed proposal to the judge that approved the warrant for the seizure. If they can get enough evidence against them they will have cause to arrest the whole bunch just for their being members of the group that have knowledge of illegal behavior.
Speculation of course, but so is assuming that they are totally innocent victims.
Also, based on the icon, the restroom for people who shit through hula hoops.Service Dog wrote: ↑ I worked another corporate/feminist event this week.
[...]
Despite the lack of license plumbers, there was avid interest in plumbing.
The men's room door was vinyl'd-over with this:
https://i.imgur.com/o4XkAqG.jpg
I just bought a Glock for home defense. I can make a fist sized pattern at 15 feet.... and the spread is much bigger at 25 feet.... but the fucker next to me at the range with an AK had a fist sized pattern at 30 feet. Pretty good weapon for home defense if you ask me.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ Regarding what I consider military style rifles:
Many semi automatic rifles are easily converted to fully automatic with few tools and a tiny amount of gunsmithing experience, not to mention with bumpstocks, which if I'm not wrong were present in the photo of his gun seizure.
Most of the guns seized were originally designed as military weapons modified to be semi-automatic. They are also manufactured to accept high capacity magazines. The short barrels, pistol grip, extreme light weight, short stocks are designed for military and mayhem. Not sniping at a deer from a hundred plus yards or varmint control, or dropping a pheasant at 20 yards. Or
I've hunted deer with a "sporterized" 303 that was a military sniper rifle in WW1 . They took off the bayonet and mounts and changed the feed.
Also bolt action, so not similar to the semi/auto rifles. Dependable and accurate at range for a clean, humane kill. Not like these dusters that are more adaptive to short range rapid fire.
There is a gray line, but let's not get too coy.
So again, they confiscated his guns not because he'd committed a crime, but because they feared he might. For exercising his 1st Amendment rights but committing no crime, the government violated his 2nd, 5th, and 6th Amendment rights, while deftly dodging the 7th by relying on the local police. Kudus, though, for pulling a warrant to satisfy the 4th.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑Judging by the activities of Atomwaffen that is coming to light, such as 5 murders coming from some of their members it wouldn't surprise me if the FBI isn't actively investigating them in order to get them a RICO or a terrorist designation and that is why they had such a detailed proposal to the judge that approved the warrant for the seizure. If they can get enough evidence against them they will have cause to arrest the whole bunch just for their being members of the group that have knowledge of illegal behavior.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑https://www.king5.com/article/news/inve ... f877977340Its white supremacist members claim they will not start the war, but they are arming themselves in preparation.
Speculation of course, but so is assuming that they are totally innocent victims.
So did you piss in the flowers? I would have.Service Dog wrote: ↑ I worked another corporate/feminist event this week.
This one funded by a major credit card company.
It was allegedly a serious business event, about small-business-sector entrepeneurship & financing.
There were several kiosks, representing women's business start ups. One sold $45 showercaps. Another, jewelry.
An floral-stylist. Saucy black-power lady-power slogans printed on t-shirts ("I don't want a seat, I want the whole table!").
Little jars of fragrance oils. Same with the panelists onstage: no plumbing female contractors or medical hardware manufacturers or anything which will last 5 years. The founder of BirchBox spoke... for a monthly subscription fee, her company sends you a mystery box of cosmetics samples.
Despite the lack of license plumbers, there was avid interest in plumbing.
The men's room door was vinyl'd-over with this:
https://i.imgur.com/o4XkAqG.jpg
The sink got a white-noise emitter to conceal ladyfarts & a bowl of tampons & a new affirmation decal on the mirror:
https://i.imgur.com/RW1kNkb.jpg
The urinals became this:
https://i.imgur.com/HA8GCnE.jpg
The event took-over the entire 6th & 1st floors of a building. By eliminating the urinals & eliminating the men's room, the women forced themselves to stand-behind men in line, waiting to all use the same stalls. There was aWhites OnlyWomen Only bathroom on the ground floor, and single toilet "unisex" bathroom, but that required waiting in line for a small, slow elevator; to then get in line for that toilet.
The whole place was decorated in pale pink, flowers flowers flowers, and empty slogans on the walls, like "CEO,000,000"
A spin-off of Johnnie Walker was served, branded as "Janie Walker".
https://i.imgur.com/qEBfy6g.jpg
One of the panelists used the phrases 'second round of venture funding' and 'founder pay'. The moderator noted that those were terms which not-every-woman would know. Where did she learn about those crucial things. She replied that she and her co-founder-- had 'asked our dads'. I thought maybe the dads should be the ones on the panel, then.
The event ended. And men showed up to take-apart the walls & lights & electric cables & rental furniture. The florists were almost-all women. The sound crew and production managers were mixed male&female. The officejob supervisors were predominately female or gay guys.
As I bicycled home, I listened to Joe Rogan talking to another comedian about fake-professional comedians who hang-around backstage at L.A.'s Comedy Store. The opened for somebody famous once, or kinda-did comedy at some point... but they've got nothing really going-on. They're there for the drinks & to hang-around real pros & sometimes they awkwardly interject themselves in a conversation between actual pros talking-shop. "It's weird", said Joe. "Imagine if there was a place where CEOs gathered to talk... but there were all these Fake CEOs hanging-around, pretending to be a part of it." I didn't have to imagine.
You know who else wasn't charged?Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ https://www.foxnews.com/us/guns-seized- ... gton-state
The group has been advocating for race war as well as training and planning for it apparently.Nuf ced.Cole was not charged with any crimes at the time.
It would seem to be a good time to get out of the NYC Art Event Community / Industry before the coming ideological escalation or purge.katamari Damassi wrote: ↑ So did you piss in the flowers? I would have.
MarcusAu wrote: ↑It would seem to be a good time to get out of the NYC Art Event Community / Industry before the coming ideological escalation or purge.katamari Damassi wrote: ↑ So did you piss in the flowers? I would have.
No Young Cocks
"People with Periods", "People with Vaginas"... the TERF cunts are lucky they didn't get protest-sprayed by girlcocks!
Clearly, the scumbag I referenced was the neo-nazi, Cole.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ I'm a scumbag I guess.
Obviously alternative sources are available - you can probably find 'The Daily Shoah' in the same places - so that could save on time.
Oh Bitchute and .com are always there. Such as they are.
Since 2010, thefts increased by 22 percent in Portland, 50 percent in San Francisco, and 61 percent in Los Angeles. In total, California, Oregon, and Washington reported 864,326 thefts to the FBI last year. The real figure is likely much higher, as many retailers have stopped reporting most shoplifting incidents to police.
Drug addiction is driving this shoplifting boom. In recent years, West Coast cities have witnessed an explosion in addiction rates for heroin, fentanyl, and meth; property crime helps feed the habit. According to federal data, adults with substance-abuse disorders make up just 2.6 percent of the total population but 72 percent of all jail inmates sentenced for property crimes. Addicts are 29 times more likely to commit property crimes than the average American.
California's Proposition 47, approved by nearly 60 percent of voters statewide in 2014, reclassified many drug and property felonies as misdemeanors, effectively decriminalizing thefts of $1,000 or less. Many criminals now believe, justifiably, that they can steal with impunity.
I guess I'm more interested in the content produced - though I'll be principled to the extent of not reporting them to the media conglomerate that made their channel possible.
That place has really gone into the shitter ever since I was banned. With no one to smack the SJWs about, they get away with saying the most outlandish things.Driftless wrote: ↑ Latest at WEIT:
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... goes-woke/
The comments start out agreeing and then turn into complaining about how annoying the "anti-woke" crowd is.
Somehow they think they are not in the demographic of the people targeted by the woke. Looking at the "Readers Photos" series seems to contradict that. I suppose they think they are the good ones and won't be attacked when their time comes.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑That place has really gone into the shitter ever since I was banned. With no one to smack the SJWs about, they get away with saying the most outlandish things.Driftless wrote: ↑ Latest at WEIT:
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... goes-woke/
The comments start out agreeing and then turn into complaining about how annoying the "anti-woke" crowd is.
Lefty says: "It is not the shoplifter's fault for what they are doing.... they are a bigger victim than the property owner." Haha. Good luck with that. The left thinks that the only virtue is compassion. They always forget about duty, and honesty, and hard work, and self reliance.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Addiction and decriminalization fuel a West Coast shoplifting boom.
Since 2010, thefts increased by 22 percent in Portland, 50 percent in San Francisco, and 61 percent in Los Angeles. In total, California, Oregon, and Washington reported 864,326 thefts to the FBI last year. The real figure is likely much higher, as many retailers have stopped reporting most shoplifting incidents to police.
Drug addiction is driving this shoplifting boom. In recent years, West Coast cities have witnessed an explosion in addiction rates for heroin, fentanyl, and meth; property crime helps feed the habit. According to federal data, adults with substance-abuse disorders make up just 2.6 percent of the total population but 72 percent of all jail inmates sentenced for property crimes. Addicts are 29 times more likely to commit property crimes than the average American.
California's Proposition 47, approved by nearly 60 percent of voters statewide in 2014, reclassified many drug and property felonies as misdemeanors, effectively decriminalizing thefts of $1,000 or less. Many criminals now believe, justifiably, that they can steal with impunity.
"her"free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ "Jessica" Yaniv of the wax my balls or I will take yo to court lost her case and has to pay the people she was harrassing. :P
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british- ... -1.5330807
Well, if Clayton* the tweaker comes back to rob my shed again, he'll discover I've moved it 1/4 mile further in on the ranch. And if he or his ilk ever comes near my house or the barn, I'll blow his worthless face off.John D wrote: ↑ Lefty says: "It is not the shoplifter's fault for what they are doing.... they are a bigger victim than the property owner." Haha. Good luck with that. The left thinks that the only virtue is compassion. They always forget about duty, and honesty, and hard work, and self reliance.
My ex-brother-in-law had a crack habit so he would break into the home of his daughter and ex-wife and steal their shit for drugs. He would steal from his own daughter's home because they wouldn't call the cops on him. People are really pretty horrible.
Bhurzum wrote: ↑You're right . Their proper pronouns should be its and yikes. and...free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ "Jessica" Yaniv of the wax my balls or I will take yo to court lost her case and has to pay the people she was harrassing. :P
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british- ... -1.5330807
"her"
"she"
https://media.gamestop.com/i/gamestop/1 ... r-Set?$pdp$
Yep, and Coyne is playing twee little linguistic games, not least using UKisms because he thinks they're smart. Typisch Juden...Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑That place has really gone into the shitter ever since I was banned. With no one to smack the SJWs about, they get away with saying the most outlandish things.Driftless wrote: ↑ Latest at WEIT:
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... goes-woke/
The comments start out agreeing and then turn into complaining about how annoying the "anti-woke" crowd is.
AndrewV69 wrote: ↑ BTW people. I keep meaning to mention PZWatch
For those of you who do not do Twatter: https://www.pzwatch.com/?p=996
At some point the level of PZ's obscurity and or relevance must be judged to have reached it's peak, or perhaps nadir.Jerry Seinfeld wrote: Who are these people?
Yeah when this first started happening I learned all about that, the sixth amendment of the Constitution guarantees a speedy trial which is interpreted by most states as one year between arrest or indictment and the trial itself. However it excludes request by the defense for more time. At present I am like a year-and-a-half into the thing with about nine months charged to each side. Both (yes both) judges involved were former prosecutors, so a continuance is usually accompanied by a phrase something like " this time is excluded for speedy trial purposes". Why is my side accepting this delay during investigation? Well maybe because they're investigating not me but the person or people who created the mean-spirited sock-puppet of fuzzy on facebooque? my own threat to pay for a private investigation if necessary is also a factor; they know they can't just float this thing by without doing a real investigation, because if they give me a fake investigation they are on notice that I'll just follow it up with a real one. Color me lucky enough to make that credible threat, but voila an inexpensive though slow solution to my problem.Service Dog wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 4:05 pmHang in there. The clock is on your side. Make sure the time that's passing counts-toward your Right To A Speedy Trial. In my case, the prosecution was able to waste an extra month... honestly, I've forgotten the details... but it had to do with telling the court they were 'ready' or 'not ready' to proceed with the case. Those words start or stop the clock. Eventually they did let the clock run out, so the charges evaporated.