There's been some debate as to whether the Q Source exists at all.Service Dog wrote: ↑ Let's all point and laugh at those ... Qanon ... theorists.
If that is true - I'm no sure how people are expected to hear the Good News.
There's been some debate as to whether the Q Source exists at all.Service Dog wrote: ↑ Let's all point and laugh at those ... Qanon ... theorists.
Thanks. I think they probably have a problem with this phrase:Service Dog wrote: ↑Fri Jan 29, 2021 3:09 pmEO 13950 Executive Order on Combating Race and Sex StereotypingThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAiCHwR3XRU[/bbvideo]
That Wokal/Lindsay discussion is a gold mine of info...
Anyone got a link to Trump's executive order barring discrimination in Federal Offices?
Issued on: September 22, 2020
https://archive.is/fisRS
Maybe when the shadow of Trump recedes and they are looking for fuel the press might have to start looking at the implications of the His Fraudulency the 2nd Joe "George Bridges" Biden's pronouncements and policies.Sec. 10. General Provisions. (a) This order does not prevent agencies, the United States Uniformed Services, or contractors from promoting racial, cultural, or ethnic diversity or inclusiveness, provided such efforts are consistent with the requirements of this order.
(b) Nothing in this order shall be construed to prohibit discussing, as part of a larger course of academic instruction, the divisive concepts listed in section 2(a) of this order in an objective manner and without endorsement.
This disinterested response is a sign of how effective the left has been in subverting the culture. Listen to Andy Ngo explain what Antifa and BLM's goals are and the extreme nature of their actions. The currently ruling party in the US have explicitly supported activists from these groups and bailed them out of jail despite their propensity for using explosives and various other weapons to destroy federal property and injure police with the stated aim of overthrowing democracy. An open display of support for actual insurrection and domestic terrorism and the response is .......... nothing! This ties in with something James Lindsay (or Wokal?) said about how violence is just expected from the left. It's like the West has been infected with a Toxoplasma Gondii variant which inures them to left wing anarchists,Marxist violence and even Swamp crimes. Clinesmith was just a scapegoat to take the heat off senior players anyway. The evidence to convict FBI agents and censure Biden/Obama for abuse of power is public knowledge but they are free and seemingly granted a license to persecute their victims.John D wrote: ↑Sat Jan 30, 2021 5:19 pmClinesmith gets almost no punishment for destroying Carter Page's life. I am amazed that when I tell this story to my wife or my friends that they just shrug. They just kind of say... oh really. I guess most people really don't care that much about truth or justice. Fucking Clinesmith... I dream about stabbing him in the neck or cutting off his fingers (but I would never do it and this is just a joke).
I fucking hate people.
We ask: why is “diversity of the investigator team” not a scorable criterion in NIH grant review and priority for funding?
Be careful with responding, because one answer is racist and the other is not (Platt, 2020).
windy wrote: ↑ Fund black scientists, don't have Buddhist monks throw them off a cliff
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S009 ... 21)00011-8We ask: why is “diversity of the investigator team” not a scorable criterion in NIH grant review and priority for funding?
Be careful with responding, because one answer is racist and the other is not (Platt, 2020).
Jesus H. Christ! That rear rotor must miss that cliff by a few feet... WTF.
What a bunch of BS. If the paranoid right doesn't want to be treated as domestic terrorists, how 'bout not invading the Capitol? Eh? Good start. Democratic legislators are concerned about their safety, want beefed up Capitol security. Who'd a thunk it?Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Tucker makes his most straightforward defense of populism yet, as well as continuing his warnings about the growing totalitarianism of the Leftist Elite:
Good. Now let’s talk about the Left Wing domestic terrorists.Hunt wrote: ↑What a bunch of BS. If the paranoid right doesn't want to be treated as domestic terrorists, how 'bout not invading the Capitol? Eh? Good start. Democratic legislators are concerned about their safety, want beefed up Capitol security. Who'd a thunk it?Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Tucker makes his most straightforward defense of populism yet, as well as continuing his warnings about the growing totalitarianism of the Leftist Elite:
The idea that right wing domestic terrorism is more dangerous than Al Qaida is not off the wall. They're armed, they're demented, they walk amongst us. And...they now have a demonstrated track record of brazen disregard for the law and of violence. Democratic legislators aren't making this shit up. It happened! The only thing that stopped that fray from being an all out blood-running-in-the-streets ordeal was that the protesters were, for the most part, unarmed. The next time they may not have that much sense. Hell yes, it is alright to make a big deal about it.
Jesus, you really have been diving in the Kool-Aid. I understand what you are saying. Unlimited tolerance for me and none for thee. Never mind the hundreds of riots instigated by organisations with the proclaimed goal of destroying democracy through the use of violence. Never mind the Federal buildings attacked, the police injured or killed, the civilians injured or murdered, the buildings destroyed and thousands of businesses destroyed. Never mind the terror campaign against people who don't share their ideology. Never mind the overt support for these actual terrorists by elected politicians, politicians who threw hissy fits about dictatorship at the thought of troops being used to control the violence, politicians who deliberately incited the violence and urged people to physically confront opposition politicians. So a few Republican congress critter got shot, no probs. Those are the good terrorists, they aren't THAT dangerous after all, I mean only the right people got hurt. No need for military purity tests or ejecting the instigators from Congress, no need for tens of thousands of troops, blanket clampdowns on social media speech, no need to ask if anyone has now or has ever looked at Orange Devil with anything other than hatred. But that MAGA crowd! Never mind the TRACK RECORD (look up the meaning of that phrase) of peacefulness. This one copycat incident (sans explosives, burning buildings and lasers) demonstrates that you just can't trust them not to engage in a bloodbath. Anyone who doesn't condemn the Orange Monster who DIDN'T incite them must be canceled and interrogated by the FBI and labeled a White Supremacist enabler! You think everyone on the right should be held responsible for a fringe group of extremists? By that logic most of the Democratic Party including the current President and VP should be run out of town.Hunt wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:35 amWhat a bunch of BS. If the paranoid right doesn't want to be treated as domestic terrorists, how 'bout not invading the Capitol? Eh? Good start. Democratic legislators are concerned about their safety, want beefed up Capitol security. Who'd a thunk it?Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Tucker makes his most straightforward defense of populism yet, as well as continuing his warnings about the growing totalitarianism of the Leftist Elite:
The idea that right wing domestic terrorism is more dangerous than Al Qaida is not off the wall. They're armed, they're demented, they walk amongst us. And...they now have a demonstrated track record of brazen disregard for the law and of violence. Democratic legislators aren't making this shit up. It happened! The only thing that stopped that fray from being an all out blood-running-in-the-streets ordeal was that the protesters were, for the most part, unarmed. The next time they may not have that much sense. Hell yes, it is alright to make a big deal about it.
Or you could say that the politicians are the ones who decided to sacrifice themselves to public service (it's not that far-fetched!) and are more valuable than the pub-dwelling schlubs. You could also argue that being willing to place yourself in danger in no way implies that you are morally more worthy of death than anyone else. Is the schoolteacher who stands up to the machete wielding kiddie butcher more deserving of death than the teacher who ran?Keating wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 4:38 amThere is an interesting moral question here: Suppose a trolley is heading towards 5 rando people of all walks of life. You can pull a lever that will cause it to switch tracks, which will cause it to head towards 5 politicians of your preferred political party (i.e. ones you'd vote for). Is it moral to pull the lever?
I think I always pull the lever, even if the 5 randos are PZ, Watson, Benson and Greg Laden. People who seek public office have chosen to be in the public eye and accept that risk, whereas the randos are just trying to live their lives. Especially true if me, as a taxpayer, is paying for the politicians security.
I was hoping that video would include a parking lot full of mannequins, with the robot running-around ripping their dicks off.MarcusAu wrote: ↑ Well, the one good thing is that we are getting damn close to where the violence and property damage can be out-sourced...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zbhvaac68Y
Oh, you mean they should have invaded and burnt down a police station, or invaded and trashed city hall, or taken over and barricaded several blocks of downtown, or set fire to courthouses and countless businesses, instead?
But he never said those things were OK. He was going to call for congressional expulsions, marshall law and gagging orders but he forgot 700 times.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:30 amOh, you mean they should have invaded and burnt down a police station, or invaded and trashed city hall, or taken over and barricaded several blocks of downtown, or set fire to courthouses and countless businesses, instead?
I'm confused as to what counts as domestic terrorism. It's almost as if there are two sets of rules.
ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑Jesus, you really have been diving in the Kool-Aid. I understand what you are saying. Unlimited tolerance for me and none for thee.
Never mind the overt support for these actual terrorists by elected politicians, politicians who threw hissy fits about dictatorship at the thought of troops being used to control the violence, politicians who deliberately incited the violence and urged people to physically confront opposition politicians.
So glad he's a good fit for our company and is enthused about what we do and how we function.Never in all my years in the technology industry had I met four VPs who looked like me and spoke like me.
Earlier today, I posted a link to an ethno-nationalist/alt-right/racist essay, which referenced the late Sam Francis.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑ who is running the US? ... Debts are being called in and Joe is paying them with the pen.
In this reply, I intended to say that no-one is running the US. Biden's executive orders are tyrannical. But there's no method to the madness-- no mastermind tyrant. The executive orders are piecemeal concessions to segments of Biden's coalition-- but the coalition isn't coalescing to make the US run smoothly. Each segment is just focussed on maintaining its own dysfunctional fiefdom. For example: The SJW academics want Biden to remove Trump's restrictions on racist SJW 'critical race theory'. But those academic take no responsibility for keeping the country running. Quite the opposite. So we get tyrannical rule with failed-state absence of statesmanship.“laws that are supposed to protect ordinary citizens against ordinary criminals” routinely go unenforced, even though the state is “perfectly capable” of doing so. While this problem rages on, government elites concentrate their interests on law-abiding citizens. In fact, Middle America winds up on the receiving end of both anarchy and tyranny.[16]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manageria ... nd_tyrannySamuel T. Francis, following James Burnham, said that under this historical process, “law is replaced by administrative decree, federalism is replaced by executive autocracy, and a limited government replaced by an unlimited state.”[9] It acts in the name of abstract goals, such as freedom, equality or positive rights, and uses its claim of moral superiority, power of taxation and wealth redistribution to keep itself in power.
Just do it.HelpingHand wrote: ↑ I work for a (the) major sportswear company in the world. Not going to use the actual name
*Rabbits can count up to four. Any number above four is hrair -- "a lot," or "a
thousand." Thus they say U Hrair -- "The Thousand" -- to mean, collectively, all
the enemies (or elil, as they call them) of rabbits -- fox, stoat, weasel, cat, owl,
man, etc" --Watership Down
First, disclaimer: I don't "like" property damage protests. It always seemed pretty juvenile and counterproductive to me. However, I "understand" given human nature how crowds can become "violent" (in the property damage respect). And therein lies a fundamental difference between protest and terror. I'm also not implying leftist protests haven't crossed the line. There's a difference between torching a cop car and chanting "hang Mike Pence" while being a minute away from him. It's the equivocation of the word "violence", one meaning against property (if it's possible to be violent to property), the other against the wellbeing of people.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑have
Service Dog wrote: ↑ One, Two, Three, Four, A Billion
*Rabbits can count up to four. Any number above four is hrair -- "a lot," or "a
thousand." Thus they say U Hrair -- "The Thousand" -- to mean, collectively, all
the enemies (or elil, as they call them) of rabbits -- fox, stoat, weasel, cat, owl,
man, etc" --Watership Down
I guess Chuck Todd forgot to tell you about the two dozen people murdered by the mostly peaceful protesters.
Been living under a rock for the last year? Antifa/BLM weren't just protesting. They carefully manipulate the naive at protests, keeping up a tirade of invective at the police and using the crowds to do the same, also using violence to provoke when they can do so unrecorded. Their strategy is to engage in violence but try to engineer the situation to make it look as if the police instigated it. They organise, come with concealed weapons and have trained revolutionaries controlling the crowds. Many policemen and civilians have been injured, with pre-meditation, with weapons brought to the scene. Petrol bombs and other explosives have been used. People have died. Business owners in affected owners have been living in TERROR, always expecting a visit from a violent mob willing to discharge firearms into their business, burn it down or beat them up for failing to display the right slogans. They've manipulated the situation to cripple the efforts of police services. This has nothing to do with Trump. They are violent anarchist revolutionaries dedicated to overthrowing the system through any means necessary, preferrably violence, and they've been organising and looking for opportunities for a long time. The media have done their utmost to hide this all allowing the ignorant to pretend they aren't violent revolutionary terrorists. You never hear about the death threats and violence perpetrated against unfriendly journalists from the MSM unless it's to tell you how they deserved it. Andy Ngo has had to move to England because of death threats from Antifa. The Democratic Party deliberately enabled this with their rhetoric because nothing is as important to them as getting their hands on power.Hunt wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 3:28 pmFirst, disclaimer: I don't "like" property damage protests. It always seemed pretty juvenile and counterproductive to me. However, I "understand" given human nature how crowds can become "violent" (in the property damage respect). And therein lies a fundamental difference between protest and terror. I'm also not implying leftist protests haven't crossed the line. There's a difference between torching a cop car and chanting "hang Mike Pence" while being a minute away from him. It's the equivocation of the word "violence", one meaning against property (if it's possible to be violent to property), the other against the wellbeing of people.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑have
The above was a response to this tweet:LeonardJamesAkaar 🧢 @LJAkaar67 ·Jan 27
Replying to
@kittypurrzog and @TheCut
That's one very well put together letter from Carrie Poppy!
@kirbmarc @AndrewV691
someone should link all this at the pit, if only for old times sake...
The article:Katie Herzog @kittypurrzog·Jan 27
More responses to the egregiously flawed article on repressed memories in @thecut that we discussed on the last podcast
This month, New York Magazine and its website, The Cut, published a story by writer Katie Heaney about the controversy surrounding “recovered memory,” and using the False Memory Syndrome Foundation as a central talking point.
Classic Carrie Poppy
I was
I was
I subsequently
I was
I have
I have
I have
I have
I am
I am
I care
I get
I am
I happened to
I know
I received
I wrote
I wanted
I don’t
rather I not
I have
I will
I am
my work
my letter
my own letter
Let me
with me
with me
like me
contact me
Arson vs. shouting with intent to sightsee
If I read that correctly, Carrie Poppy just promised to publish at Medium.com ...any and all letters ...so long as you CC: New York magazine & tie-in your letter to the topic of 'recovered memories'.
Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑
Classic Carrie Poppy
You missed a juicy one:I was
I was
I subsequently
I was
I have
I have
I have
I have
I am
I am
I care
....
"I pray"
You have to ask yourself who has actually drank the Kool Aid here. The FBI doesn't consider Antifa a serious threat. Democratic leaders have denounced Antifa violence, and Antifa has no overt connection to the Democratic party. You seem versed in critical thinking, entrenched ideology, confirmation bias, etc. Tell me, which is more credible, the FBI, or whatever fringe sources you used to fuel this rant. Yes, I have heard this type of talk before, usually form batshit far right websites. Antifa is a well organized, hierarchical group with ranks, etc. Here's another tenet of critical thinking: avoid self reinforcing belief systems. The leftist mainstream media is "in on it", the Dems condemn them only because there's a covert association between the two...and so on.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑Been living under a rock for the last year? Antifa/BLM weren't just protesting. They carefully manipulate the naive at protests, keeping up a tirade of invective at the police and using the crowds to do the same, also using violence to provoke when they can do so unrecorded. Their strategy is to engage in violence but try to engineer the situation to make it look as if the police instigated it. They organise, come with concealed weapons and have trained revolutionaries controlling the crowds. Many policemen and civilians have been injured, with pre-meditation, with weapons brought to the scene. Petrol bombs and other explosives have been used. People have died. Business owners in affected owners have been living in TERROR, always expecting a visit from a violent mob willing to discharge firearms into their business, burn it down or beat them up for failing to display the right slogans. They've manipulated the situation to cripple the efforts of police services. This has nothing to do with Trump. They are violent anarchist revolutionaries dedicated to overthrowing the system through any means necessary, preferrably violence, and they've been organising and looking for opportunities for a long time. The media have done their utmost to hide this all allowing the ignorant to pretend they aren't violent revolutionary terrorists. You never hear about the death threats and violence perpetrated against unfriendly journalists from the MSM unless it's to tell you how they deserved it. Andy Ngo has had to move to England because of death threats from Antifa. The Democratic Party deliberately enabled this with their rhetoric because nothing is as important to them as getting their hands on power.Hunt wrote: ↑Tue Feb 02, 2021 3:28 pmFirst, disclaimer: I don't "like" property damage protests. It always seemed pretty juvenile and counterproductive to me. However, I "understand" given human nature how crowds can become "violent" (in the property damage respect). And therein lies a fundamental difference between protest and terror. I'm also not implying leftist protests haven't crossed the line. There's a difference between torching a cop car and chanting "hang Mike Pence" while being a minute away from him. It's the equivocation of the word "violence", one meaning against property (if it's possible to be violent to property), the other against the wellbeing of people.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑have
All of that is apparently not as serious as ONE fucking incident, ONE, just ONE where a crowd of idiots got out of control partly because they were egged on by Antifa agitators embedded in the crowd. Show me proof of some well-established group of revolutionaries behind them a fraction as ruthless and organised as Antifa and their affiliates and I might take you seriously. Anyone supporting Trump must take responsibility for Capitol Hill and suffer denial of their rights despite almost all of them never having participated in any kind of destructive protest, but people on the left who participate in nightly riots, punching and kicking people, spewing hatred against all and sundry, they're just a bit misguided and boisterous. You are seriously confused. It's OK when the left does it.