Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

Old subthreads
Locked
UnbelieveSteve
.
.
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:37 pm
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1321

Post by UnbelieveSteve »

Tony Parsehole wrote:
Tigzy wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:
UnbelieveSteve wrote:Here's a version of ool0n's blocklist without the rest of the bullshit on his page.
No registering necessary. http://x2t.com/blocklist
There's nearly two hundred twitter accounts there!
Are those two nitwits still trying to convince people that their objective is to block only those accounts persistantly making unwanted tweets at FTBers?
Bollocks.
:lol: I didn't make any tweets at any FTBers at all.
Some funny accounts too. "Oolonblowscocks"
LOL!

Good to see I'm not on there. Oolon couldn't find me if I gave him directions the stupid twat.
I've been rewriting the little bot list and added a snowflake list to it. Taking requests at #snowflakesunday on twitter. lol.
http://x2t.com/blocklist
Adding to the list will be easy enough. Most of the scripting is just about done.
I might make a dedicated one, including FTBers, AthiPlussers, feminininists and religious nuts.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1322

Post by cunt »

ReneeHendricks wrote:
cunt wrote:Well then don't read it. At least assisted suicide is an interesting topic.
Hey, thanks for the obvious tip. Don't know what I would have done without it.
No problemo.

decius
.
.
Posts: 1365
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:08 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1323

Post by decius »

I think he was called in to assist during the final phases of FTB's Seppuku.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1324

Post by Tigzy »

Excellent post by Noelplum here, giving his take on rape culture:

http://noelplum99.blogspot.co.uk/2013/0 ... lture.html

EdgePenguin
.
.
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:44 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1325

Post by EdgePenguin »

The latest A+ fail has delivered again:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 991#p71005

"Use our redefinition of racism or get booted"

Cunning Punt
.
.
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:50 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1326

Post by Cunning Punt »

Lsuoma wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Michael K Gray wrote:Did you know that a survey showed that 34% of blokes say that:
they like their smart-phone as much as they like sex?
For me, they are similar.
About 5 inches long, and have seen more than their share of Angry Birds.
5 inches? poor you...
But it never goes soft.
And he hasn't had a piss in 3 days.

Guest

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1327

Post by Guest »

decius wrote:I think Apple is late with Apple TVs and dildos.
dude, do not get them on about teledildonics

Al Stefanelli
.
.
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Contact:

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1328

Post by Al Stefanelli »

EdgePenguin wrote:The latest A+ fail has delivered again:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 991#p71005

"Use our redefinition of racism or get booted"
http://www.alstefanelli.com/youwill.jpg

EdgePenguin
.
.
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:44 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1329

Post by EdgePenguin »

Al Stefanelli wrote:
EdgePenguin wrote:The latest A+ fail has delivered again:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 991#p71005

"Use our redefinition of racism or get booted"
http://www.alstefanelli.com/youwill.jpg
The Force has a strong effect on the week minded. Meanwhile, we cackle like Jabba at their tricks.

Angry_Drunk
.
.
Posts: 458
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1330

Post by Angry_Drunk »

Guest wrote:
decius wrote:I think Apple is late with Apple TVs and dildos.
dude, do not get them on about teledildonics
I LOVE TELEDILDONICS!!!

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1331

Post by Tigzy »

Trigger warning - do not read this if you have coffee in close proximity to your keyboard.

You know how recently, SGBM has been going on about people 'bullying' him. Well, this post here...I mean, I have to wonder - is SGBM actually Simpleflower?
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-565997
Explain what was actually wrong with what I said. It is a fact that Joe harassed me for hours last night. It is a fact that he said all those horrible things. It is a fact that you are now contributing to the bullying.

Why am I not supposed to say these things?

Why am I not supposed to point out when I am being treated unfairly?

(even now I’m shaking as you are attempting to accuse me of bullying)

You are contributing to the bullying me!

But why don’t you stop and think? Think how it makes me feel when you say these things about me, or when Joe says all those horrible things about me?

I was shaking last night, but I wasn’t just shaking. I was crying and I kept feeling like I was going to throw up. I couldn’t get to sleep because I knew that he would keep on bullying me while I was sleeping.

And yes, your aggression against me now is making me shake. That’s about the least of my concerns right now, but it is upsetting. Why don’t you stop to think about my feelings before you lay into me?
:lol: :lol: :lol: 'I couldn’t get to sleep because I knew that he would keep on bullying me while I was sleeping.' Please bear in mind that this bullying consists of other Pharyngulites saying things he doesn't like. Fuckin hilarious. SG, if you're reading - you have my sympathies. Not because of the so-called bullying, but because you're such a pathetic dingbat that you could give an amoeba delusions of grandeur.

Cunning Punt
.
.
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:50 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1332

Post by Cunning Punt »

Tigzy wrote:
Metalogic42 wrote:Look at this image that Will included in his most recent response to Harriet Hall. Just look at it for awhile:

http://skepchick.org/wp-content/uploads/url-3.jpeg
Dunno about you, but I'm thinking crop circles.
Surely we can add a few to this.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1333

Post by Tigzy »

I mean, fuck - how bad must your life be if the only friends you have are online Pharyngulite baboons?

So much for the fuckin 'horde'.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1334

Post by welch »

Guest wrote:
decius wrote:I think Apple is late with Apple TVs and dildos.
dude, do not get them on about teledildonics
Wearable computing is the future.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1335

Post by welch »

Al Stefanelli wrote:
EdgePenguin wrote:The latest A+ fail has delivered again:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 991#p71005

"Use our redefinition of racism or get booted"
http://www.alstefanelli.com/youwill.jpg
The best part? Here's the definition of racism FROM THEIR GLOSSARY:

discrimination or social prejudice against People of Color. (Important - See also: -isms , Colorblind racism)

So all this prattle about power structure is all bollocks. Even in Zaire, only white people can be racist.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1336

Post by welch »

Tigzy wrote:Trigger warning - do not read this if you have coffee in close proximity to your keyboard.

You know how recently, SGBM has been going on about people 'bullying' him. Well, this post here...I mean, I have to wonder - is SGBM actually Simpleflower?
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-565997
Explain what was actually wrong with what I said. It is a fact that Joe harassed me for hours last night. It is a fact that he said all those horrible things. It is a fact that you are now contributing to the bullying.

Why am I not supposed to say these things?

Why am I not supposed to point out when I am being treated unfairly?

(even now I’m shaking as you are attempting to accuse me of bullying)

You are contributing to the bullying me!

But why don’t you stop and think? Think how it makes me feel when you say these things about me, or when Joe says all those horrible things about me?

I was shaking last night, but I wasn’t just shaking. I was crying and I kept feeling like I was going to throw up. I couldn’t get to sleep because I knew that he would keep on bullying me while I was sleeping.

And yes, your aggression against me now is making me shake. That’s about the least of my concerns right now, but it is upsetting. Why don’t you stop to think about my feelings before you lay into me?
:lol: :lol: :lol: 'I couldn’t get to sleep because I knew that he would keep on bullying me while I was sleeping.' Please bear in mind that this bullying consists of other Pharyngulites saying things he doesn't like. Fuckin hilarious. SG, if you're reading - you have my sympathies. Not because of the so-called bullying, but because you're such a pathetic dingbat that you could give an amoeba delusions of grandeur.

I couldn't run away because I knew that even thousands of miles away, he would keep hitting me.

Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1337

Post by Altair »

Tigzy wrote:Trigger warning - do not read this if you have coffee in close proximity to your keyboard.

You know how recently, SGBM has been going on about people 'bullying' him. Well, this post here...I mean, I have to wonder - is SGBM actually Simpleflower?
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-565997
Explain what was actually wrong with what I said. It is a fact that Joe harassed me for hours last night. It is a fact that he said all those horrible things. It is a fact that you are now contributing to the bullying.

Why am I not supposed to say these things?

Why am I not supposed to point out when I am being treated unfairly?

(even now I’m shaking as you are attempting to accuse me of bullying)

You are contributing to the bullying me!

But why don’t you stop and think? Think how it makes me feel when you say these things about me, or when Joe says all those horrible things about me?

I was shaking last night, but I wasn’t just shaking. I was crying and I kept feeling like I was going to throw up. I couldn’t get to sleep because I knew that he would keep on bullying me while I was sleeping.

And yes, your aggression against me now is making me shake. That’s about the least of my concerns right now, but it is upsetting. Why don’t you stop to think about my feelings before you lay into me?
:lol: :lol: :lol: 'I couldn’t get to sleep because I knew that he would keep on bullying me while I was sleeping.' Please bear in mind that this bullying consists of other Pharyngulites saying things he doesn't like. Fuckin hilarious. SG, if you're reading - you have my sympathies. Not because of the so-called bullying, but because you're such a pathetic dingbat that you could give an amoeba delusions of grandeur.
I wonder if they have always been this way and that's why they were attracted to these so-called "safe spaces", or is their constant permanence in these spaces what has rendered effectively incapable of functioning in the real world.

They are so sheltered the slightest disagreement, opposition or denial is perceived as terrible bullying.
It's also telling how they get more and more upset when the other side doesn't back down when they use the "you're bullying me!" line.
They cannot understand why the other person doesn't immediately apologize and grovel when they start screaming "you hurt my feelings".

It's kinda sad how their emotional development seems to have stopped at age 3.

EdgePenguin
.
.
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:44 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1338

Post by EdgePenguin »

welch wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:
EdgePenguin wrote:The latest A+ fail has delivered again:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 991#p71005

"Use our redefinition of racism or get booted"
http://www.alstefanelli.com/youwill.jpg
The best part? Here's the definition of racism FROM THEIR GLOSSARY:

discrimination or social prejudice against People of Color. (Important - See also: -isms , Colorblind racism)

So all this prattle about power structure is all bollocks. Even in Zaire, only white people can be racist.
Does anyone have an active account on the atheism plus forum? Dare to ask them what their view on Robert Mugabe persecuting white farmers is?

Mr Danksworth
.
.
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:30 pm

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1339

Post by Mr Danksworth »

Jonathan wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:
Metalogic42 wrote:Look at this image that Will included in his most recent response to Harriet Hall. Just look at it for awhile:

http://skepchick.org/wp-content/uploads/url-3.jpeg
"What sign are you?"
:rimshot:
What the hell is "alternate form"?
Otherkin? Because i'm really a pegacorn elf on the inside. STOP OPPRESSING MEEEEE!

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1340

Post by JackSkeptic »

EdgePenguin wrote:The latest A+ fail has delivered again:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 991#p71005

"Use our redefinition of racism or get booted"
They sound more like the denizens of Hitler's bunker as time goes by.

I'm waiting for someone to say 'Of course, YES YES YES Meinn Furher how could I have been so stupid? It has to be my privilege!!! It is like thedevil Patriachy, I must...fight it. Oh how lucky I am you pointing out the error of my ways Oh Lord Meinn Enlightened One. I prostrate myself at your deep wisdom, infinite patience and kindness.'

I'd have said 'Fuck off and get a grip on reality' but then I doubt I would be welcome there. I'd be sent to Gulag a Re-education Camp 101 banned in short order.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1341

Post by Tigzy »

...and thus it passed on that very night, I was awoken by the most eldritch scream emanating from the room above. A cry from the dark and terrible heart of all that is blasphemous; a screech to blanch the nethermost folds of the most fearsome night-gaunt. I knew, then, what had happened: the man above, who I had likened to the merest paramecium, had finally been cast out from his protectors, the Pharyngulites. All that awaited him now was the cold and blasted ruins of a world fit for the squamous horror of the Slyme. Into the darkness he was taken, by the shunning of those guardians who turned their pale backs upon him.

"Ia! Ia! Cthulhu fltaghn!" he cried, before falling...


H P Lovecraft, 'Strange Gods Before Me'

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1342

Post by AndrewV69 »

@Submariner,

I followed the links you gave and I was very disappointed in the quality of the material. Very disappointed. The following links lead to the type of studies/papers I use to form my opinions and subsequently reference for my arguments.

Something relatively new (to me anyway), is that the focus here is on epigenetics rather than genetics. Examples are:

Homosexuality as a Consequence of Epigenetically Canalized Sexual Development
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/668167
Pedigree and twin studies indicate that homosexuality has substantial heritability in both sexes, yet concordance between identical twins is low and molecular studies have failed to find associated DNA markers
Study finds epigenetics, not genetics, underlies homosexuality
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/ ... 120612.php
According to the study, published online today in The Quarterly Review of Biology, sex-specific epi-marks, which normally do not pass between generations and are thus "erased," can lead to homosexuality when they escape erasure and are transmitted from father to daughter or mother to son.
A Genetic Study of Male Sexual Orientation
http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article ... eid=495588
However, the rate of homosexuality among nontwin biological siblings, as reported by probands, 9.2% (13/142), was significantly lower than would be predicted by a simple genetic hypothesis and other published reports
Example of articles that are more accessable than the above may be found here:

Epigenetics May Be a Critical Factor Contributing to Homosexuality, Study Suggests
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... .htm[quote]
Epigenetics -- how gene expression is regulated by temporary switches, called epi-marks -- appears to be a critical and overlooked factor contributing to the long-standing puzzle of why homosexuality occurs.[/quote]

Scientists claim that homosexuality is not genetic — but it arises in the womb
http://io9.com/5967426/scientists-confi ... n-the-womb
A team of international researchers has completed a study that suggests we will probably never find a ‘gay gene.' Sexual orientation is not about genetics, say the researchers, it's about epigenetics.
I guess this should not come as a surprise so someone who has been paying close attention. This entry from 2008 for example:

Homosexual Behavior Largely Shaped By Genetics And Random Environmental Factors
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 205430.htm
genetics and environmental factors (which are specific to an individual, and may include biological processes such as different hormone exposure in the womb), are important determinants of homosexual behaviour.

16bitheretic
.
.
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:00 pm

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1343

Post by 16bitheretic »

Just a quickie on race and the Atheism Plus forums: A+ shove it up your ass, seriously.

Last time I looked on your forums about a week ago in both the "Atheism Plus" and "Organization, Charity and Activism" forums, the vast majority of your top topics were stuff bitching about what other atheist/skeptic groups had said online, specifically geared towards women's issues. The few topics I saw which mentioned race at all were:

1) A topic about the Olympic athlete who killed his girlfriend and his white ethnicity possibly leading to easier sentencing. Well the first post was about that, the other 2 posts were people bitching about a UK tabloid posting the bikini model pics his girlfriend had posed for.

2) A topic about William Shatner criticizing reddit admins for the racist and sexist comments sections he saw on reddit discussion topics. This thread on A+ turned into a debate over which Star Trek series was best.

3) A thread championing a day of solidarity for African-American atheists. ZERO replies in a 5 day span. Apparently bitching about alleged twitter harassment or what so-and-so said on blog x is far more pressing.

A+, don't try and pretend you actually care for shit about any ethnic minorities, you only care about using minorities as a prop to elevate your SJW cred and to bully people.

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1344

Post by JackSkeptic »

EdgePenguin wrote:
welch wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:
EdgePenguin wrote:The latest A+ fail has delivered again:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 991#p71005

"Use our redefinition of racism or get booted"
http://www.alstefanelli.com/youwill.jpg
The best part? Here's the definition of racism FROM THEIR GLOSSARY:

discrimination or social prejudice against People of Color. (Important - See also: -isms , Colorblind racism)

So all this prattle about power structure is all bollocks. Even in Zaire, only white people can be racist.
Does anyone have an active account on the atheism plus forum? Dare to ask them what their view on Robert Mugabe persecuting white farmers is?
They will use the same reason as Mugabe does.

As a guess they will say the white farmers stole the land from the blacks in the first place and they are simply reclaiming what is theirs. The whites resisting are racist enemies of black people and by not leaving voluntarily they are showing their colonialist superiority complexes which fed into the white patriarchy during the years of oppression. Violence against them is understandable given their attitude and years of pent up emotion in the face of such bigotry.

They will ignore:

1. The corruption

2. Starvation

3. That many farms are ruined and many blacks put out of work.

4. The nepotism.

5. The ruination of the economy.

6. Absence of democracy and accountability

The whole lot will be blamed on colonialism.

AbsurdWalls
.
.
Posts: 863
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1345

Post by AbsurdWalls »

Jack wrote:
EdgePenguin wrote:The latest A+ fail has delivered again:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 991#p71005

"Use our redefinition of racism or get booted"
They sound more like the denizens of Hitler's bunker as time goes by.

I'm waiting for someone to say 'Of course, YES YES YES Meinn Furher how could I have been so stupid? It has to be my privilege!!! It is like thedevil Patriachy, I must...fight it. Oh how lucky I am you pointing out the error of my ways Oh Lord Meinn Enlightened One. I prostrate myself at your deep wisdom, infinite patience and kindness.'

I'd have said 'Fuck off and get a grip on reality' but then I doubt I would be welcome there. I'd be sent to Gulag a Re-education Camp 101 banned in short order.
I imagine that discussion has now moved to the members-only forum. You have to wonder what the atmosphere is like in there. Is it more relaxed, because they are less afraid of accidentally extending any courtesy to a troll? Or do they let it all hang out?

Do they acknowledge their mistakes (like how Flewellyn can't do maths)?

Al Stefanelli
.
.
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Contact:

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1346

Post by Al Stefanelli »

Cunning Punt wrote:
Tigzy wrote:
Metalogic42 wrote:Look at this image that Will included in his most recent response to Harriet Hall. Just look at it for awhile:

http://skepchick.org/wp-content/uploads/url-3.jpeg
Dunno about you, but I'm thinking crop circles.
Surely we can add a few to this.
http://www.alstefanelli.com/genderglyphs.jpg

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1347

Post by welch »

Mr Danksworth wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:
Metalogic42 wrote:Look at this image that Will included in his most recent response to Harriet Hall. Just look at it for awhile:

http://skepchick.org/wp-content/uploads/url-3.jpeg
"What sign are you?"
:rimshot:
What the hell is "alternate form"?
Otherkin? Because i'm really a pegacorn elf on the inside. STOP OPPRESSING MEEEEE!
WHY DO YOU OPPRESS FURRIES!!!!

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1348

Post by JackSkeptic »

Al Stefanelli wrote:
Cunning Punt wrote:
Tigzy wrote:
Metalogic42 wrote:Look at this image that Will included in his most recent response to Harriet Hall. Just look at it for awhile:

http://skepchick.org/wp-content/uploads/url-3.jpeg
Dunno about you, but I'm thinking crop circles.
Surely we can add a few to this.
http://www.alstefanelli.com/genderglyphs.jpg

If my cock rotates does that mean I'm a 'rotated variant'? These are important issues and I need to know.

EdgePenguin
.
.
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:44 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1349

Post by EdgePenguin »

Jack wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:
Cunning Punt wrote:
Tigzy wrote:
Metalogic42 wrote:Look at this image that Will included in his most recent response to Harriet Hall. Just look at it for awhile:

http://skepchick.org/wp-content/uploads/url-3.jpeg
Dunno about you, but I'm thinking crop circles.
Surely we can add a few to this.
http://www.alstefanelli.com/genderglyphs.jpg

If my cock rotates does that mean I'm a 'rotated variant'? These are important issues and I need to know.
I'm maturing as a person. I've resisted the urge to link you to meatspin.

ReneeHendricks
.
.
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 am
Location: Kent, WA
Contact:

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1350

Post by ReneeHendricks »

Grrr. In my reading as of late, I'm finding more and more articles/posts on people (feminists and their "white knights") being all bent out of shape over the lack of the female voice within different fields/topics. For whatever reason, many people tend to attribute this to sexism and the patriarchy. Even more discouraging is that these people don't even bother to think of reasons *other* than sexism or patriarchy. I'd love to see other feedback on this. I'm not saying "it's the nature of the female" but I do think there are some inherent traits that led themselves towards women not being so vocal in various fields/topics. Thoughts?

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1351

Post by JackSkeptic »

AbsurdWalls wrote:
Jack wrote:
EdgePenguin wrote:The latest A+ fail has delivered again:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 991#p71005

"Use our redefinition of racism or get booted"
They sound more like the denizens of Hitler's bunker as time goes by.

I'm waiting for someone to say 'Of course, YES YES YES Meinn Furher how could I have been so stupid? It has to be my privilege!!! It is like thedevil Patriachy, I must...fight it. Oh how lucky I am you pointing out the error of my ways Oh Lord Meinn Enlightened One. I prostrate myself at your deep wisdom, infinite patience and kindness.'

I'd have said 'Fuck off and get a grip on reality' but then I doubt I would be welcome there. I'd be sent to Gulag a Re-education Camp 101 banned in short order.
I imagine that discussion has now moved to the members-only forum. You have to wonder what the atmosphere is like in there. Is it more relaxed, because they are less afraid of accidentally extending any courtesy to a troll? Or do they let it all hang out?

Do they acknowledge their mistakes (like how Flewellyn can't do maths)?
Yes, would be fun knowing that. I suspect they have the pecking order sorted out (based purely on victim points) so posts will be judged on that rather than content. They always have the defence of 'don't erase/gaslight me' if it gets tricky.

However as it is impossible to communicate effectively following their modes of thinking I suspect they are more relaxed, as you say, but with the caveat SJW wordings can be thrown in when needed to win an argument or stop an attack.

ReneeHendricks
.
.
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 am
Location: Kent, WA
Contact:

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1352

Post by ReneeHendricks »

That should have been "lend" not "led". I blame vodka shots (it's Wednesday and I'm happy - fuck you all ;))

Maximus
.
.
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:08 am

Steve Novella

#1353

Post by Maximus »

Lapsang Souchong wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:Steven Novella chimes in to the Harriet Hall threat with a bit of a slapdown for Rebecca - pointing out that there are many posts on Skepchick blog using exactly the same language that the SJW and Watson are using to criticize Hall.

He should be careful.
She might kick him off the 'Skepchicks Guide to the Universe'
Gwod, wouldn't it be nice if she gets pissed with Novella and flounces from SGU? I'd love to be able to listen to that podcast without being subjected to her annoying voice.
I don't mind her voice, it's her repugnant dismissive attitude that puts me off. I really stopped listening 6 months ago when I found out about all the crazy going on, and it not being addressed on the show (lie of omission?). It's like ignoring that your priests are molesting kids because they don't do it "in" the church. (Yes, yes an exageration, but hopefully people get the point) I mean how can you have one of your co-hosts causing all sorts of crazy drama, and not address it?

People a bunch of pages back were commenting on AronRa, about how he was 'staying out of it', and good for him. I disagree, avoiding the conversation does nothing to help solve the problem. Hopefully AronRa and Steve Novella get more involved. The only way to get past all this crap is to have the conversations, and not have high minded people stay out of it, because well it so petty.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1354

Post by welch »

Al Stefanelli wrote:
Cunning Punt wrote:
Tigzy wrote:
Metalogic42 wrote:Look at this image that Will included in his most recent response to Harriet Hall. Just look at it for awhile:

http://skepchick.org/wp-content/uploads/url-3.jpeg
Dunno about you, but I'm thinking crop circles.
Surely we can add a few to this.
http://www.alstefanelli.com/genderglyphs.jpg
http://bynkii.com/bynkiidotcomimages/glyphs.png

Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1355

Post by Altair »

ReneeHendricks wrote:That should have been "lend" not "led". I blame vodka shots (it's Wednesday and I'm happy - fuck you all ;))
This is mainly annecdotical evidence, but I think that there are fields that tend to be more interesting to women and others are more interesting to men.

I work in software development, and in my experience, women don't tend to be interested in being programmers. I have never seen the sexism or bad attitudes some people claim are common in IT (the A+ guys would be killing me right now for saying that), and in fact 2 of the 4 or 5 best programmers I know are women. One of them was even my boss at a certain moment. From my position, I don't see anything that's keeping them from being a programmer except their own wish.

Conversely, I've seen a lot of people in requirements analysis and testing. My hyphotesis is that these fields allow them to work more with people and less with machines, and women, in my experience, tend to be more interested in people than machines. That's not saying that women cannot work with machines, or that men can't work with people, just that in average they tend to lean towards one side or the other.

A very useful response to the kind of people you mention is to ask them about the fields where women are over represented, and ask them if that worries them. If they were equal opportunity worriers, I'd actually be able to take them seriously.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1356

Post by welch »

Greta wants Jen's Clueless crown:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2013/ ... religious/

OMG, HOW COULD ATHEISTS BE LIKE THiS!!!!

Well ya dingbat, look at FTB for the last few years. the fucking answer is RIGHT THERE.

katamari Damassi
.
.
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1357

Post by katamari Damassi »

Jonathan wrote:Once again the A+ers are pushing the line that racism isn't racism if the person or people don't have institutional power behind them.

Just where the hell does this "definition" come from? Checked four or five different dictionaries and none of them deem racism to require institutional power; just discrimination based on race.
I've heard that as the definition of "institutional racism" and have heard others attempt to squeeze all of racism into that rubric, but not everyone agrees. Even if you conceded that minorities cannot be racist by that definition, they can still be prejudiced, or bigoted.

katamari Damassi
.
.
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1358

Post by katamari Damassi »

welch wrote:Greta wants Jen's Clueless crown:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2013/ ... religious/

OMG, HOW COULD ATHEISTS BE LIKE THiS!!!!

Well ya dingbat, look at FTB for the last few years. the fucking answer is RIGHT THERE.
Can you freezepage this? I really hate going there.

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1359

Post by JackSkeptic »

ReneeHendricks wrote:Grrr. In my reading as of late, I'm finding more and more articles/posts on people (feminists and their "white knights") being all bent out of shape over the lack of the female voice within different fields/topics. For whatever reason, many people tend to attribute this to sexism and the patriarchy. Even more discouraging is that these people don't even bother to think of reasons *other* than sexism or patriarchy. I'd love to see other feedback on this. I'm not saying "it's the nature of the female" but I do think there are some inherent traits that led themselves towards women not being so vocal in various fields/topics. Thoughts?
I really don't know although I know it is not misogyny, at least to any extent that would be noticeable. One thing I do know, as a man, is that if there were a 'Manism' movement highly active and divisive in the community I would not want to be associated with that. People from outside looking in may well assume it is a position the whole movement takes and be put off by it.

Also as these SJW types jump all over woman who do not swallow their narrative I suspect that would be very discouraging. People want to get on with what they enjoy doing. It is largely a waste of time to have to spend dealing with these people and it takes an emotional investment they would rather spend elsewhere, such as their work.

I think some of the worst vitriol we see is against women, but not by us, but by those that pretend to represent them.

So I feel parts of our community are sexist and therefore against women adding their voice, but it is not those who have sexism charges laid against them, such as us.

Finally, like all people, women hate being patronised or told they are victims and need special treatment or consideration. They are deeply patronised which again may be something women do not want. The insistence by SJW's of identifying someone's worth by their gender is highly destructive in that regard.

Guest

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1360

Post by Guest »

welch wrote:
Guest wrote:
decius wrote:I think Apple is late with Apple TVs and dildos.
dude, do not get them on about teledildonics
Wearablerapeable computing is the future.
ftfy

katamari Damassi
.
.
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1361

Post by katamari Damassi »

another lurker wrote: They cry a lot. I have even seen some of them threaten suicide ("I did something terrible in meatspace, I should just off myself, I'm such a sexist/racist/etc), only to be consoled and given multiple hugs by 'the horde'. It's kind of, well, disturbing really!
Suicide is the ultimate flounce. It's really only a matter of time before one or more of them succumbs to the temptation.

Apples
.
.
Posts: 2406
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1362

Post by Apples »

ReneeHendricks wrote:Grrr. In my reading as of late, I'm finding more and more articles/posts on people (feminists and their "white knights") being all bent out of shape over the lack of the female voice within different fields/topics. For whatever reason, many people tend to attribute this to sexism and the patriarchy. Even more discouraging is that these people don't even bother to think of reasons *other* than sexism or patriarchy. I'd love to see other feedback on this. I'm not saying "it's the nature of the female" but I do think there are some inherent traits that led themselves towards women not being so vocal in various fields/topics. Thoughts?
Somewhat relevant - PZ links to a blogpost reporting a ***sexist*** comment on an academic list-serv. Those darn misogynists. He doesn't name the offender. So who is this sexist troll who said female grad students (or possibly applicants) need to step it up if they want to succeed in highly-competitive research fields?

https://twitter.com/cbjones1943

Looks to me like feminists dislike CB Jones for being an old-fashioned gender-blind realist who doesn't think women or anyone else should be exempted from the obligation to compete.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -question/
http://www.freezepage.com/1361391315JPLAVQNXPH

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1363

Post by JackSkeptic »

katamari Damassi wrote:
Jonathan wrote:Once again the A+ers are pushing the line that racism isn't racism if the person or people don't have institutional power behind them.

Just where the hell does this "definition" come from? Checked four or five different dictionaries and none of them deem racism to require institutional power; just discrimination based on race.
I've heard that as the definition of "institutional racism" and have heard others attempt to squeeze all of racism into that rubric, but not everyone agrees. Even if you conceded that minorities cannot be racist by that definition, they can still be prejudiced, or bigoted.
They say they can be prejudiced or bigoted.

The word 'racist' is of course contextual, like all descriptors. You may be talking about institutional racism, group racism or a person's racism. It makes sense, has utility and follows normal English usage. They are trying to redefine it to just institutional racism which is simply wrong. They are doing this to put the blame on some nebulous concept from which they can claim victimhood while they remain immune from any charges of racism themselves. It is an obvious and tedious tactic which everyone sees through. The word prejudiced does not have the same impact as racism ( and can easily be countered by victimhood status) so they are hijacking the common usage of the word 'racist' to exploit that.

In other words what they are doing is all bollocks.

Outwest
.
.
Posts: 448
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:01 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1364

Post by Outwest »

welch wrote:Greta wants Jen's Clueless crown:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2013/ ... religious/

OMG, HOW COULD ATHEISTS BE LIKE THiS!!!!

Well ya dingbat, look at FTB for the last few years. the fucking answer is RIGHT THERE.
I'm wondering what this means:
The piece of news: someone got stuck in a consensual but dangerous situation involving an unconventional sexual activity
Let me guess. It wasn't a priest with an underage boy/girl. Probably (but then, maybe?) a priest with a prostitute. Hmm...who else does she have "compassion" for?


Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1366

Post by Lsuoma »

Apples wrote:
Jonathan wrote:Amusement to be had at A+ where Hyperdeath the site admin dared to go against the party line by claiming that "reverse racism" can happen. This has NOT gone down well with the faithful, including two of the mods.

Expect a grovelling retraction soon.
Yeah - it's pretty spectacular - I'm hoping Ceepolk tries to temp-ban Hyperdeath. The soft underbelly of intellectually bankrupt SJW thinking on racism is on full display in that thread.
That thread is so full of LOLwankery!

http://slymepit.com/staticimgs/isms.jpg

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1367

Post by Tigzy »

Jack wrote: If my cock rotates does that mean I'm a 'rotated variant'? These are important issues and I need to know.
Are you Meatspin guy?

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1368

Post by welch »


AnotherLurkerMkII

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1369

Post by AnotherLurkerMkII »

welch wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:
EdgePenguin wrote:The latest A+ fail has delivered again:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 991#p71005

"Use our redefinition of racism or get booted"
http://www.alstefanelli.com/youwill.jpg
The best part? Here's the definition of racism FROM THEIR GLOSSARY:

discrimination or social prejudice against People of Color. (Important - See also: -isms , Colorblind racism)

So all this prattle about power structure is all bollocks. Even in Zaire, only white people can be racist.
Yeah, because you know, only white people can be racist. It's not like the Japanese had been racist against the Chinese, or that the Hutu never practiced genocide against the Tutsis, or that the Curds were never persecuted by the Sunis in Iraq, etc...

I think that more than anything, the ability to be an irredemable asshole in the rights circumstances binds every ethnic group on Planet Earth together as equals.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1370

Post by Lsuoma »

cunt wrote:Well then don't read it. At least assisted suicide is an interesting topic.
OMFG!!!!!

That slymepitter Cunt is making death threats against us!!!!

/faint!!!

AbsurdWalls
.
.
Posts: 863
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1371

Post by AbsurdWalls »

Altair wrote: ...My hyphotesis is that these fields allow them to work more with people and less with machines, and women, in my experience, tend to be more interested in people than machines. That's not saying that women cannot work with machines, or that men can't work with people, just that in average they tend to lean towards one side or the other...
I teach a tiny bit of programming to my students and I find that women "get it" just as easily as men do. That's got me thinking about my work where even within the same job title there are some components (technical skills) that are "optional" (well, sometimes), such as programming. You can choose to program your own solutions, to get someone else to do it for you, or to find an off-the-shelf solution that works. Thinking about it, I don't think I can point to any particular trend I have noticed based on gender. One issue with that though is that there is a gender imbalance in my field (guessing 20-30% female) so that makes it harder to spot the differences in the behaviours of each gender.

SkepticalCat
.
.
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 5:36 pm
Location: Georgia, USA

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1372

Post by SkepticalCat »

welch wrote:Greta wants Jen's Clueless crown:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2013/ ... religious/

OMG, HOW COULD ATHEISTS BE LIKE THiS!!!!

Well ya dingbat, look at FTB for the last few years. the fucking answer is RIGHT THERE.
What was the guy doing (the Priest who called 9-1-1)? I don't care what his name is, but naturally I'm curious about his shenanigans, and I don't want to give Greeda any blog hits. :)

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1373

Post by welch »

Apples wrote:
ReneeHendricks wrote:Grrr. In my reading as of late, I'm finding more and more articles/posts on people (feminists and their "white knights") being all bent out of shape over the lack of the female voice within different fields/topics. For whatever reason, many people tend to attribute this to sexism and the patriarchy. Even more discouraging is that these people don't even bother to think of reasons *other* than sexism or patriarchy. I'd love to see other feedback on this. I'm not saying "it's the nature of the female" but I do think there are some inherent traits that led themselves towards women not being so vocal in various fields/topics. Thoughts?
Somewhat relevant - PZ links to a blogpost reporting a ***sexist*** comment on an academic list-serv. Those darn misogynists. He doesn't name the offender. So who is this sexist troll who said female grad students (or possibly applicants) need to step it up if they want to succeed in highly-competitive research fields?

https://twitter.com/cbjones1943

Looks to me like feminists dislike CB Jones for being an old-fashioned gender-blind realist who doesn't think women or anyone else should be exempted from the obligation to compete.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -question/
http://www.freezepage.com/1361391315JPLAVQNXPH
Yeah. It's not like Clara B. Jones has a blog, or has written books or anything USEFUL... http://www.amazon.com/Clara-B.-Jones/e/B001K9037K

One day, she'll be as much a contributor as PeeZus.

AnotherLurkerMkII

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1374

Post by AnotherLurkerMkII »

Outwest wrote:
welch wrote:Greta wants Jen's Clueless crown:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2013/ ... religious/

OMG, HOW COULD ATHEISTS BE LIKE THiS!!!!

Well ya dingbat, look at FTB for the last few years. the fucking answer is RIGHT THERE.
I'm wondering what this means:
The piece of news: someone got stuck in a consensual but dangerous situation involving an unconventional sexual activity
Let me guess. It wasn't a priest with an underage boy/girl. Probably (but then, maybe?) a priest with a prostitute. Hmm...who else does she have "compassion" for?
Or it's Eucliwood.

16bitheretic
.
.
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:00 pm

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1375

Post by 16bitheretic »

ReneeHendricks wrote:Grrr. In my reading as of late, I'm finding more and more articles/posts on people (feminists and their "white knights") being all bent out of shape over the lack of the female voice within different fields/topics. For whatever reason, many people tend to attribute this to sexism and the patriarchy. Even more discouraging is that these people don't even bother to think of reasons *other* than sexism or patriarchy. I'd love to see other feedback on this. I'm not saying "it's the nature of the female" but I do think there are some inherent traits that led themselves towards women not being so vocal in various fields/topics. Thoughts?
Observing from the perspective of a person raised up in the 90's and 00's in a first world nation, I suspect that outside of the nature/nurture debate many fail to recognize a key component of human behavior (as I see it anyways), and that is something called the Path of Least Resistance.

There's for the most part in first world societies little preventing women in modern times from joining STEM fields or traditionally "manly" pursuits such as military and police in terms of legal prohibitions. Additionally the social stigmas of men and women who take on careers in fields traditionally aligned opposite their gender are fading as time passes. But now that the legal walls have come down we see that societal changes on a wide scale, particularly in a nation like the US with a very large population and alot of diversity, happen on the scale of decades and generations, not in short time periods.

Women are increasing their presence in STEM and in heavy physical careers like police work, but to expect a ratio of 50-50 right now is unrealistic. All we can realistically do is remove legal barriers, educate all children in an egalitarian style now and going forward, and accept the fact that change happens slowly, whereas I think everyone expects it overnight. (I say a similar thing about long term change when it comes to people talking about the rise of atheism/agnosticism in the US. We will win against the theocrats and fascist end times loons, but we're looking at change on the scale of decades)

But as far as the SJWs and their so-called advocating on behalf of women: fuck off, I don't need your help. I can achieve what I want to without your trying to paint me as some helpless little creature who needs your benevolent sexism and your divisive rhetoric that would try to use my ethnicity or gender to prop yourselves up as some hero on the internet.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1376

Post by welch »

Lsuoma wrote:
Apples wrote:
Jonathan wrote:Amusement to be had at A+ where Hyperdeath the site admin dared to go against the party line by claiming that "reverse racism" can happen. This has NOT gone down well with the faithful, including two of the mods.

Expect a grovelling retraction soon.
Yeah - it's pretty spectacular - I'm hoping Ceepolk tries to temp-ban Hyperdeath. The soft underbelly of intellectually bankrupt SJW thinking on racism is on full display in that thread.
That thread is so full of LOLwankery!

http://slymepit.com/staticimgs/isms.jpg
It's funny that piegasm's avatar is one of the most racist and misogynistic races in the Star Trek Universe.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1377

Post by cunt »

Lsuoma wrote: That thread is so full of LOLwankery!

http://slymepit.com/staticimgs/isms.jpg
So say Quark of the Space Jew Alliance.

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1378

Post by AndrewV69 »

ReneeHendricks wrote:Grrr. In my reading as of late, I'm finding more and more articles/posts on people (feminists and their "white knights") being all bent out of shape over the lack of the female voice within different fields/topics. For whatever reason, many people tend to attribute this to sexism and the patriarchy. Even more discouraging is that these people don't even bother to think of reasons *other* than sexism or patriarchy. I'd love to see other feedback on this. I'm not saying "it's the nature of the female" but I do think there are some inherent traits that led themselves towards women not being so vocal in various fields/topics. Thoughts?
Possibly related, and as it ties in with my observations on IQ and other things it is simply because :

The average woman could not care less about some things. End of story. Period. The average woman does not give a flying fuck at a rolling donut hole about the things some of the lunatics are always going on about.

The Judgy Bitch agrees:
Her IQ is higher than Einstein’s. What does she care about? Her nails, fake tanning, and her hair. Lady genius in action!
http://judgybitch.com/2013/02/18/her-iq ... in-action/
HER AMBITION IN LIFE IS TO BE A SHOWGIRL!
*shrug*

Remember I noted that women tend to be conservative as a whole? Apparently she agrees also:

http://judgybitch.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/chart.jpg


YMMV


Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Anne Robinson has no soul, and is history, thank fuck!

#1380

Post by Altair »

Dick Strawkins wrote:http://i.imgur.com/DRsQqKK.jpg
The transgender symbol makes me think of this

http://bit.ly/ZhpM1b

Locked